Biomechanical effects of manipulating peak vertical ground reaction force throughout gait in individuals 6-12 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Knee joint pathology and efferent pathway dysfunction: Mapping muscle inhibition from motor cortex to muscle force

BACKGROUND

Dysfunction in efferent pathways after knee pathology is tied to long-term impairments in quadriceps and hamstrings muscle performance, daily function, and health-related quality of life. Understanding the underlying etiology is crucial for effective treatment and prevention of poor outcomes, such as post-traumatic osteoarthritis or joint replacement.

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize recent evidence of efferent pathway dysfunction (i.e., motor cortex, motor units) among individuals with knee pathology.

DESIGN

Commentary.

METHOD

We summarize the current literature investigating the motor cortex, corticospinal tract, and motoneuron pool in individuals with three common knee pathologies: anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, anterior knee pain (AKP), and knee osteoarthritis (OA). To offer a complete perspective, we draw from studies applying a range of neuroimaging and neurophysiologic techniques.

RESULTS

Adaptations within the motor cortices, corticospinal tract, and motoneuron pool are present in those with knee pathology and underline impairments in quadriceps and hamstrings muscle function. Each pathology has evidence of altered motor system excitability and reduced volitional muscle activation and force-generating capacity, but few impairments were common across ACL injury, AKP, and OA studies. These findings underscore the central role of the motor cortex and motor unit behavior in the long-term outcomes of individuals with knee pathology.

CONCLUSIONS

Adaptations in the efferent pathways underlie persistent muscle dysfunction across three common knee pathologies. This review provides an overview of these changes and summarizes key findings from neurophysiology and neuroimaging studies, offering direction for future research and clinical application in the rehabilitation of joint injuries.

Relationships Between Running Biomechanics and Femoral Articular Cartilage Thickness and Composition in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Patients

BACKGROUND

Although individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) are at high risk for posttraumatic osteoarthritis, mechanisms underlying the relationship between running and knee cartilage health remain unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate how 30 min of running influences femoral cartilage thickness and composition and their relationships with running biomechanics in patients with ACLR and controls.

METHODS

Twenty patients with ACLR (time post-ACLR: 14.6 ± 6.1 months) and 20 matched controls participated in the study. A running session required both groups to run for 30 min at a self-selected speed. Before and after running, we measured femoral cartilage thickness via ultrasound imaging. A MRI session consisted of T2 mapping.

RESULTS

The ACLR group showed longer T2 relaxation times in the medial femoral condyle at resting compared with the control group (central: 51.2 ± 16.6 vs. 34.9 ± 13.2 ms, p = 0.006; posterior: 50.2 ± 10.1 vs. 39.8 ± 7.4 ms, p = 0.006). Following the run, the ACLR group showed greater deformation in the medial femoral cartilage than the control group (0.03 ± 0.01 vs. 0.01 ± 0.01 cm, p = 0.001). Additionally, the ACLR group showed significant negative correlations between resting T2 relaxation time in the medial femoral condyle and vertical impulse (standardized regression coefficients = -0.99 and p = 0.004) during running.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that those who are between 6 and 24 months post-ACLR have degraded cartilage composition and their cartilage deforms more due to running vGRF.

Biomechanical Effects of Manipulating Preferred Cadence During Treadmill Walking in Patients With ACL Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Abnormal gait is common after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) which may influence osteoarthritis risk in this population. Yet few gait retraining options currently exist in ACLR rehabilitation. Cueing cadence changes is a simple, low-cost method that can alter walking mechanics in healthy adults, but few studies have tested its effectiveness in an ACLR population. Here, we evaluated the acute effects of altering cadence on knee mechanics in patients 9 to 12 months post ACLR.

HYPOTHESIS

Cueing larger steps will facilitate larger knee angles and moments, while cueing smaller steps would induce smaller knee angles and moments.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized cross-sectional design.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients with unilateral ACLR underwent gait assessments on a treadmill at preferred pace. Preferred walking gait was assessed first to obtain preferred cadence. Participants then completed trials while matching an audible beat set to 90% and 110% of preferred cadence in a randomized order. Three-dimensional sagittal and frontal plane biomechanics were evaluated bilaterally.

RESULTS

Compared with preferred cadence, cueing larger steps induced larger peak knee flexion moments (KFMs) and knee extension excursions bilaterally (P < 0.01), whereas cueing smaller steps only reduced knee flexion excursions (P < 0.01). Knee adduction moments remain unchanged across conditions and were similar between limbs (P > 0.05). Peak KFMs and excursions were smaller in the injured compared with uninjured limb (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Frontal plane gait outcomes were unchanged across conditions suggesting acute cadence manipulations result in mainly sagittal plane adaptations. Follow-up studies using a longitudinal cadence biofeedback paradigm may be warranted to elucidate the utility of this gait retraining strategy after ACLR.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Cueing changes in walking cadence can target sagittal plane knee loading and joint range of motion in ACLR participants. This strategy may offer high clinical translatability given it requires relatively minimal equipment (ie, free metronome app) outside of a treadmill.

Effect of sensor number and location on accelerometry-based vertical ground reaction force estimation during walking

Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of global disability and is a major cost for the healthcare system. Lower extremity loading is a determinant of knee osteoarthritis onset and progression; however, technology that assists rehabilitative clinicians in optimizing key metrics of lower extremity loading is significantly limited. The peak vertical component of the ground reaction force (vGRF) in the first 50% of stance is highly associated with biological and patient-reported outcomes linked to knee osteoarthritis symptoms. Monitoring and maintaining typical vGRF profiles may support healthy gait biomechanics and joint tissue loading to prevent the onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis. Yet, the optimal number of sensors and sensor placements for predicting accurate vGRF from accelerometry remains unknown. Our goals were to: 1) determine how many sensors and what sensor locations yielded the most accurate vGRF loading peak estimates during walking; and 2) characterize how prescribing different loading conditions affected vGRF loading peak estimates. We asked 20 young adult participants to wear 5 accelerometers on their waist, shanks, and feet and walk on a force-instrumented treadmill during control and targeted biofeedback conditions prompting 5% underloading and overloading vGRFs. We trained and tested machine learning models to estimate vGRF from the various sensor accelerometer inputs and identified which combinations were most accurate. We found that a neural network using one accelerometer at the waist yielded the most accurate loading peak vGRF estimates during walking, with average errors of 4.4% body weight. The waist-only configuration was able to distinguish between control and overloading conditions prescribed using biofeedback, matching measured vGRF outcomes. Including foot or shank acceleration signals in the model reduced accuracy, particularly for the overloading condition. Our results suggest that a system designed to monitor changes in walking vGRF or to deploy targeted biofeedback may only need a single accelerometer located at the waist for healthy participants.

Modifying loading during gait leads to biochemical changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein concentrations in a subgroup of individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

PURPOSE

Strong observational evidence has linked changes in limb loading during walking following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to posttraumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA). It remains unknown if manipulating peak loading influences joint tissue biochemistry. Thus, the purpose of this study is to determine whether manipulating peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during gait influences changes in serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP) concentrations in ACLR participants.

METHODS

Forty ACLR individuals participated in this randomized crossover study (48% female, age = 21.0 ± 4.4 years, BMI = 24.6 ± 3.1). Participants attended four sessions, wherein they completed one of four biofeedback conditions (habitual loading (no biofeedback), high loading (5% increase in vGRF), low loading (5% decrease in vGRF), and symmetrical loading (between-limb symmetry in vGRF)) while walking on a treadmill for 3000 steps. Serum was collected before (baseline), immediately (acute post), 1 h (1 h post), and 3.5 h (3.5 h post) following each condition. A comprehensive general linear mixed model was constructed to address the differences in sCOMP across all conditions and timepoints in all participants and a subgroup of sCOMP Increasers.

RESULTS

No sCOMP differences were found across the entire cohort. In the sCOMP Increasers, a significant time × condition interaction was found (F9,206 = 2.6, p = 0.009). sCOMP was lower during high loading than low loading (p = 0.009) acutely (acute post). At 3.5 h post, sCOMP was higher during habitual loading than symmetrical loading (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest that manipulating lower limb loading in ACLR patients who habitually exhibit an acute increase in sCOMP following walking results in improved biochemical changes linked to cartilage health. Key Points • This study assesses the mechanistic link between lower limb load modification and joint tissue biochemistry at acute and delayed timepoints. • Real-time biofeedback provides a paradigm to experimentally assess the mechanistic link between loading and serum biomarkers. • Manipulating peak loading during gait resulted in a metabolic effect of lower sCOMP concentrations in a subgroup of ACLR individuals. • Peak loading modifications may provide an intervention strategy to mitigate the development of PTOA following ACLR.

Sustained Limb-Level Loading: A Ground Reaction Force Phenotype Common to Individuals at High Risk for and Those With Knee Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the vertical (vGRF), anterior-posterior (apGRF), and medial-lateral (mlGRF) ground reaction force (GRF) profiles throughout the stance phase of gait (1) between individuals 6 to 12 months post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and uninjured matched controls and (2) between ACLR and individuals with differing radiographic severities of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), defined as Kellgren and Lawrence (KL) grades KL2, KL3, and KL4.

METHODS

A total of 196 participants were included in this retrospective cross-sectional analysis. Gait biomechanics were collected from individuals 6 to 12 months post-ACLR (n = 36), uninjured controls matched to the ACLR group (n = 36), and individuals with KL2 (n = 31), KL3 (n = 67), and KL4 osteoarthritis (OA) (n = 26). Between-group differences in vGRF, apGRF, and mlGRF were assessed in reference to the ACLR group throughout each percentage of stance phase using a functional linear model.

RESULTS

The ACLR group demonstrated lower vGRF and apGRF in early and late stance compared to the uninjured controls, with large effects (Cohen's d range: 1.35-1.66). Conversely, the ACLR group exhibited greater vGRF (87%-90%; 4.88% body weight [BW]; d = 0.75) and apGRF (84%-94%; 2.41% BW; d = 0.79) than the KL2 group in a small portion of late stance. No differences in mlGRF profiles were observed between the ACLR and either the uninjured controls or the KL2 group. The magnitude of difference in GRF profiles between the ACLR and OA groups increased with OA disease severity.

CONCLUSION

Individuals 6 to 12 months post-ACLR exhibit strikingly similar GRF profiles as individuals with KL2 KOA, suggesting both patient groups may benefit from targeted interventions to address aberrant GRF profiles.

Acutely Normalizing Walking Speed Does Not Normalize Gait Biomechanics Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of acutely increasing walking speed on gait biomechanics in ACLR individuals compared with their habitual speed and uninjured matched-controls.

METHODS

Gait biomechanics were collected on 30 ACLR individuals (20 females; age, 22.0 ± 4.2 yr; body mass index, 24.0 ± 3.0 kg·m -2 ) at their habitual speed and at 1.3 m·s -1 , a speed similar to controls, and 30 uninjured matched-controls (age: 21.9 ± 3.8, body mass index: 23.6 ± 2.5) at their habitual speed. Functional waveform analyses compared biomechanics between: i) walking at habitual speed vs 1.3 m·s -1 in ACLR individuals; and ii) ACLR individuals at 1.3 m·s -1 vs controls.

RESULTS

In the ACLR group, there were no statistically significant biomechanical differences between walking at habitual speed (1.18 ± 0.12 m·s -1 ) and 1.3 m·s -1 (1.29 ± 0.05 m·s -1 ). Compared with controls (habitual speed: 1.34 ± 0.12 m·s -1 ), the ACLR group while walking at 1.3 m·s -1 exhibited smaller vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during early and late stance (13-28, 78-90% stance phase), greater midstance vGRF (47-61%), smaller early-to-midstance knee flexion angle (KFA; 1-44%), greater mid-to-late stance KFA (68-73, 96-101%), greater internal knee abduction moment (69-101%), and smaller internal knee extension moment (4-51, 88-96%).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing walking speed to a speed similar to uninjured controls did not elicit significant changes to gait biomechanics, and ACLR individuals continued to demonstrate biomechanical profiles that are associated with PTOA development and differ from controls.

Delayed cartilage oligomeric matrix protein response to loading is associated with femoral cartilage composition post-ACLR

PURPOSE

To determine associations between immediate and delayed response of serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (sCOMP) to loading (i.e., 3000 walking steps) and femoral cartilage interlimb T1ρ relaxation times in individual's post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 20 individuals 6-12 months following primary ACLR (65% female, 20.5 ± 4.0 years old, 24.9 ± 3.0 kg/m2, 7.3 ± 1.5 months post-ACLR). Serum samples were collected prior to, immediately following, and 3.5 h following walking 3000 steps on a treadmill at habitual walking speed. sCOMP concentrations were processed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Immediate and delayed absolute sCOMP responses to loading were evaluated immediately and 3.5 h post-walking, respectively. Participants underwent bilateral magnetic resonance imaging with T1ρ sequences to calculate resting femoral cartilage interlimb T1ρ relaxation time ratios between limbs (i.e., ACLR/Uninjured limb). Linear regression models were fitted to determine associations between sCOMP response to loading and femoral cartilage T1ρ outcomes controlling for pre-loading sCOMP concentrations.

RESULTS

Greater increases in delayed sCOMP response to loading were associated with greater lateral (∆R2 = 0.29, p = 0.02) but not medial (∆R2 < 0.01, p = 0.99) femoral cartilage interlimb T1ρ ratios. Associations between immediate sCOMP response to loading with femoral cartilage interlimb T1ρ ratios were weak and non-significant (∆R2 range = 0.02-0.09, p range = 0.21-0.58).

CONCLUSION

Greater delayed sCOMP response to loading, a biomarker of cartilage breakdown, is associated with worse lateral femoral cartilage composition in the ACLR limb compared to the uninjured limb. Delayed sCOMP response to loading may be a more indicative metabolic indicator linked to deleterious changes in composition than immediate sCOMP response.

Knee kinetics and the medial femoral cartilage cross-sectional area response to loading in indviduals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Ultrasonography is capable of detecting morphological changes in femoral articular cartilage cross-sectional area in response to an acute bout of walking; yet, the response of femoral cartilage cross-sectional area varies between individuals. It is hypothesized that differences in joint kinetics may influence the response of cartilage to a standardized walking protocol. Therefore, the study purpose was to compare internal knee abduction and extension moments between individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction who demonstrate an acute increase, decrease, or unchanged medial femoral cross-sectional area response following 3000 steps.

METHODS

The medial femoral cartilage in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed limb was assessed with ultrasonography before and immediately following 3000 steps of treadmill walking. Knee joint moments were calculated in the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed limb and compared between groups throughout the stance phase of gait using linear regression and functional, mixed effects waveform analyses.

FINDINGS

No associations between peak knee joint moments and the cross-sectional area response were observed. The group that demonstrated an acute cross-sectional area increase exhibited 1) lower knee abduction moments in early stance in comparison to the group that exhibited a decreased cross-sectional area response; and 2) greater knee extension moments in early stance in comparison to the group with an unchanged cross-sectional area response.

INTERPRETATION

The propensity of femoral cartilage to acutely increase cross-sectional area in response to walking is consistent with less-dynamic knee abduction and knee extension moment profiles.

Mechanical Factors Contributing to Altered Knee Extension Moment during Gait after ACL Reconstruction: A Longitudinal Analysis

PURPOSE

This study aimed to comprehensively examine the extent to which knee flexion angle at initial contact, peak knee flexion angle, and vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) contribute to knee extension moments during gait in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

Overground gait biomechanics were evaluated in 26 participants with ACL reconstruction at three time points (about 2, 4, and 6 months after the surgery). Knee flexion angle at initial contact, peak knee flexion angle, peak vGRF, and peak knee extension moment were calculated for each limb during the early stance phase of gait for all three time points. A change score from baseline (time point 2 - time point 1 and time point 3 - time point 1) along with limb symmetry values (ACL - non-ACL limb values) was also calculated for these variables. Multiple linear regressions utilizing classical and Bayesian interference methods were used to determine the contribution of knee flexion angle and vGRF to knee extension moment during gait.

RESULTS

Peak knee flexion angle and peak vGRF positively contributed to knee extension moment during gait in both the reconstructed ( R2 = 0.767, P < 0.001) and nonreconstructed limbs ( R2 = 0.815, P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for the symmetry values ( R2 = 0.673, P < 0.001) and change scores ( R2 = 0.731-0.883; all P < 0.001), except that the changes in knee flexion angle at initial contact also contributed to the model using the change scores in the nonreconstructed limb (time point 2 - time point 1: R2 = 0.844, P < 0.001; time point 3 - time point 1: R2 = 0.883, P < 0.001). Bayesian regression evaluating the likelihood of these prediction models showed that there was decisive evidence favoring the alternative model over the null model (all Bayes factors >1000). Standardized β coefficients indicated that changes in knee flexion angle had a greater impact (>2×) on knee extension moments than vGRF at both time points in both limbs ( βvGRF = 0.204-0.309; βkneeflexion = 0.703-0.831).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that both knee flexion angle and peak vGRF positively contribute to altered knee extension moments during gait, but the contribution of knee flexion angle is much greater than vGRF. Therefore, treatment strategies targeting these variables may improve knee loading after ACL reconstruction.

Worse Tibiofemoral Cartilage Composition Is Associated with Insufficient Gait Kinetics After ACL Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Greater articular cartilage T1ρ magnetic resonance imaging relaxation times indicate less proteoglycan density and are linked to posttraumatic osteoarthritis development after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Although changes in T1ρ relaxation times are associated with gait biomechanics, it is unclear if excessive or insufficient knee joint loading is linked to greater T1ρ relaxation times 12 months post-ACLR. The purpose of this study was to compare external knee adduction (KAM) and flexion (KFM) moments in individuals after ACLR with high versus low tibiofemoral T1ρ relaxation profiles and uninjured controls.

METHODS

Gait biomechanics were collected in 26 uninjured controls (50% females; age, 22 ± 4 yr; body mass index, 23.9 ± 2.8 kg·m -2 ) and 26 individuals after ACLR (50% females; age, 22 ± 4 yr; body mass index, 24.2 ± 3.5 kg·m -2 ) at 6 and 12 months post-ACLR. ACLR-T1ρ High ( n = 9) and ACLR-T1ρ Low ( n = 17) groups were created based on 12-month post-ACLR T1ρ relaxation times using a k-means cluster analysis. Functional analyses of variance were used to compare KAM and KFM.

RESULTS

ACLR-T1ρ High exhibited lesser KAM than ACLR-T1ρ Low and uninjured controls 6 months post-ACLR. ACLR-T1ρ Low exhibited greater KAM than uninjured controls 6 and 12 months post-ACLR. KAM increased in ACLR-T1ρ High and decreased in ACLR-T1ρ Low between 6 and 12 months, both groups becoming more similar to uninjured controls. There were scant differences in KFM between ACLR-T1ρ High and ACLR-T1ρ Low 6 or 12 months post-ACLR, but both groups demonstrated lesser KFM compared with uninjured controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Associations between worse T1ρ profiles and increases in KAM may be driven by the normalization of KAM in individuals who initially exhibit insufficient KAM 6 months post-ACLR.

Differences in Gait Biomechanics Between Adolescents and Young Adults With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT

Adolescents and adults are treated similarly in rehabilitation and research despite differences in clinical recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Aberrant gait is a clinical outcome associated with poor long-term health post-ACLR but has not been compared between adolescents and adults.

OBJECTIVE

To compare gait biomechanical waveforms throughout stance between adolescents (<18 years old) and young adults (≥18 years old) post-ACLR.

DESIGN

Case-control study.

SETTING

Laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

Adolescents (n = 13, girls = 77%, age = 16.7 ± 0.6 years, height = 1.7 ± 0.1 m, weight = 22.2 ± 3.7 kg/m2) were identified from a cross-sectional cohort assessing clinical outcomes 6 to 12 months post-ACLR. Young adults (n = 13, women = 77%, age = 22.3 ± 4.0 years, height = 1.7 ± 0.1 m, weight = 22.9 ± 3.3 kg/m2) were matched based on sex, time since surgery (±2 months), and body mass index (±3 kg/m2).

INTERVENTION(S)

Participants performed 5 gait trials at their habitual speed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Three-dimensional gait biomechanics and forces were collected. Vertical ground reaction force normalized to body weight (xBW), knee-flexion angle (°), knee-abduction moment (xBW × height), and knee-extension moment (BW × height) waveforms were calculated during the stance phase of gait (0%-100%). Habitual walking speed was compared using independent t tests. We used functional waveforms to compare gait biomechanics throughout stance with and without controlling for habitual walking speed by calculating mean differences between groups with 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Adolescents walked with slower habitual speeds compared with adults (adolescents = 1.1 ± 0.1 m/s, adults = 1.3 ± 0.1 m/s, P < .001). When gait speed was not controlled, adolescents walked with less vertical ground reaction force (9%-15% of stance) and knee-abduction moment (12%-25% of stance) during early stance and less knee-extension moment during late stance (80%-99% of stance). Regardless of their habitual walking speed, adolescents walked with greater knee-flexion angle throughout most stances (0%-21% and 29%-100% of stance).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescents and adults demonstrated different gait patterns post-ACLR, suggesting that age may play a role in altered gait biomechanics.

Linking Gait Biomechanics and Daily Steps After ACL Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Aberrant biomechanics and altered loading frequency are associated with poor knee joint health in osteoarthritis development. After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), individuals demonstrate underloading (lesser vertical ground reaction force (vGRF)) with stiffened knee gait biomechanics (lesser knee extension moment (KEM) and knee flexion angle) and take fewer daily steps as early as 6 months after surgery. The purpose of this cross-sectional laboratory study is to compare gait biomechanics throughout stance between individuals 6-12 months after ACLR who take the lowest, moderate, and highest daily steps.

METHODS

Individuals with primary, unilateral history of ACLR between the ages of 16 and 35 yr were included (n = 36, 47% females; age, 21 ± 5 yr; months since ACLR, 8 ± 2). Barefoot gait biomechanics of vGRF (body weight), KEM (body weight × height), and knee flexion angle during stance were collected and time normalized. Average daily steps were collected via a waist-mounted accelerometer in free-living settings over 7 d. Participants were separated into tertiles based on lowest daily steps (3326-6042 daily steps), moderate (6043-8198 daily steps), and highest (8199-12,680 daily steps). Biomechanical outcomes of the ACLR limb during stance were compared between daily step groups using functional waveform gait analyses.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in sex, body mass index, age, or gait speed between daily step groups. Individuals with the lowest daily steps walk with lesser vGRF and lesser KEM during weight acceptance, and lesser knee flexion angle throughout stance in the ACLR limb compared with individuals with highest and moderate daily steps.

CONCLUSIONS

After ACLR, individuals who take the fewest daily steps also walk with lesser vGRF during weight acceptance and a stiffened knee strategy throughout stance. These results highlight complex interactions between joint loading parameters after ACLR.

Individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice underloading strategies during daily activity

Underloading the surgical limb has been described in biomechanical studies across recovery time points following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr). This study aimed to examine the extent to which laboratory findings translate to daily activities. Limb loading was quantified during a sit-to-stand task in laboratory testing and throughout 2 days of daily activity in 15 individuals 114.8 (17.2) days post-ACLr and 15 controls. Vertical force impulse calculated from force platform (laboratory) and pressure insoles (daily) was used to quantify limb loading. Between-limb symmetry was calculated for limb loading and knee strength measures, 2 × 2 GLM repeated measures determined a significant group-by-limb interaction on daily limb loading. Surgical limb daily loading was lower compared to nonsurgical (p < .001; effect sizes [ES] = 0.63), and control matched limbs (surgical: p = .037, ES = 0.80 and nonsurgical: p = .02, ES = 0.89). No group differences were found in total daily loading (summed loading between limbs; p = .18; ES = 0.50) and time performing weight-bearing activities (p = .32; ES = 0.36). Pearson's correlation determined that between-limb symmetry in daily loading was related to sit-to-stand loading (r = .62; p = .01) and knee extensor strength symmetry (r = .6; p = .02) in the ACLr group. These data support the presence of underloading behaviors in individuals 10-14 weeks following ACLr that are consistent with previous biomechanical studies and current biomechanical data. Knee extensor weakness was related to greater underloading. Asymmetrical loading quantified in the laboratory is practiced throughout the day in individuals post-ACLr. Practice afforded by daily activities represents powerful contributors to learning of a pattern that contrasts the goal of rehabilitation exercises.

Loading during Midstance of Gait Is Associated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Cartilage Composition Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

A complex association exists between aberrant gait biomechanics and posttraumatic knee osteoarthritis (PTOA) development. Previous research has primarily focused on the link between peak loading during the loading phase of stance and joint tissue changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). However, the associations between loading and cartilage composition at other portions of stance, including midstance and late stance, is unclear. The objective of this study was to explore associations between vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) at each 1% increment of stance phase and tibiofemoral articular cartilage magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) T1ρ relaxation times following ACLR.

DESIGN

Twenty-three individuals (47.82% female, 22.1 ±4.1 years old) with unilateral ACLR participated in a gait assessment and T1ρ MRI collection at 12.25 ± 0.61 months post-ACLR. T1ρ relaxation times were calculated for the articular cartilage of the weightbearing medial and lateral femoral (MFC, LFC) and tibial (MTC, LTC) condyles. Separate bivariate, Pearson product moment correlation coefficients (r) were used to estimate strength of associations between T1ρ MRI relaxation times in the medial and lateral tibiofemoral articular cartilage with vGRF across the entire stance phase.

RESULTS

Greater vGRF during midstance (46%-56% of stance phase) was associated with greater T1ρ MRI relaxation times in the MFC (r ranging between 0.43 and 0.46).

CONCLUSIONS

Biomechanical gait profiles that include greater vGRF during midstance are associated with MRI estimates of lesser proteoglycan density in the MFC. Inability to unload the ACLR limb during midstance may be linked to joint tissue changes associated with PTOA development.

Vertical ground reaction force 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction predicts 10-year patient-reported outcomes

Disruptions in knee biomechanics during walking following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury have been suggested to lead to the development of premature knee osteoarthritis (OA) and to be potential markers of OA risk and targets for intervention. This study investigated if side-to-side differences in early stance peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) during walking 2 years after ACL reconstruction are associated with longer-term (10 years post-reconstruction) changes in patient-reported outcomes. Twenty-eight participants (mean age: 28.7 ± 6.4 years) with primary unilateral ACL reconstruction underwent gait analysis for assessment of peak vGRF and completed Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) surveys at 2 years post-surgery (2.2 ± 0.3 years) and completed surveys at follow-up 10 years post-surgery (10.5 ± 0.9 years). Associations between changes (10-2 years) in patient-reported outcomes and between limb-differences in vGRF were assessed with Pearson or Spearman's ρ correlation coefficients and exploratory backwards elimination multiple linear regression analyses. Differences in vGRF between symptomatic progressors and non-progressors were also assessed. The side-to-side difference in vGRF was related to the variability in longer-term changes in patient-reported outcome metrics and distinguished symptomatic progressors from non-progressors. Participants with higher vGRF in the reconstructed (ACLR) limb versus the contralateral limb had worsening of IKDC (R = -0.391, p = 0.040), KOOS pain (ρ = -0.396, p = 0.037), KOOS symptoms (ρ = -0.572, p = 0.001), and KOOS quality of life (R = -0.458, p = 0.014) scores at follow-up. Symptomatic progressors had greater vGRF in the ACLR limb as compared to the contralateral limb at baseline than non-progressors (p = 0.023). These data highlight associations between a simple-to-measure gait metric and the development of long-term clinical symptoms after an ACL injury.

Gait asymmetries are exacerbated at faster walking speeds in individuals with acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Previous research suggests more biomechanically demanding tasks (e.g., stair descent, hopping) magnify biomechanical asymmetries compared with walking after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, it is unclear if modifying task-specific constraints, like walking speed also elicits greater biomechanical asymmetries in this population. We examined the effects of manipulating walking speed on ground reaction force (GRF) asymmetries in individuals with ACL reconstruction and uninjured controls. Thirty individuals with ACL reconstruction (age = 20.6 ± 5.4 years, body mass index [BMI] = 23.9 ± 3.3 kg/m2 ) and 15 controls (age = 23.1 ± 4.5 years, BMI = 23.6 ± 2.7 kg/m2 ) were tested on an instrumented treadmill at three speeds (100%, 120%, and 80% self-selected speed). Bilateral vertical and posterior-anterior GRFs were recorded at each speed. GRF asymmetries were calculated by subtracting the uninjured from the injured limb at each percent of stance. Statistical parametric mapping was used to evaluate the effects of speed on GRF asymmetries across stance. We found vertical and posterior GRF asymmetries were exacerbated at faster speeds and reduced at slower speeds in ACL individuals but not controls (p < .05). No differences in anterior GRF asymmetries were observed between speeds in either group (p > .05). Our results suggest increasing walking speed magnifies GRF asymmetries in individuals with ACL reconstruction. Statement of Clinical Significance: Evaluating both preferred and fast walking speeds may aid in characterizing biomechanical asymmetries in individuals with ACL reconstruction which may be valuable in earlier rehabilitative time points when more difficult tasks like hopping and running are not feasible.

Kinetic measurement system use in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a scoping review of methodological approaches

Purpose

Our primary objectives were to (1) describe current approaches for kinetic measurements in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and (2) suggest considerations for methodological reporting. Secondarily, we explored the relationship between kinetic measurement system findings and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Methods

We followed the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O’Malley’s 6-stage framework. Seven electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to June 2020. Original research papers reporting parameters measured by kinetic measurement systems in individuals at least 6-months post primary ACLR were included.

Results

In 158 included studies, 7 kinetic measurement systems (force plates, balance platforms, pressure mats, force-measuring treadmills, Wii balance boards, contact mats connected to jump systems, and single-sensor insoles) were identified 4 main movement categories (landing/jumping, standing balance, gait, and other functional tasks). Substantial heterogeneity was noted in the methods used and outcomes assessed; this review highlighted common methodological reporting gaps for essential items related to movement tasks, kinetic system features, justification and operationalization of selected outcome parameters, participant preparation, and testing protocol details. Accordingly, we suggest considerations for methodological reporting in future research. Only 6 studies included PROMs with inconsistency in the reported parameters and/or PROMs.

Conclusion

Clear and accurate reporting is vital to facilitate cross-study comparisons and improve the clinical application of kinetic measurement systems after ACLR. Based on the current evidence, we suggest methodological considerations to guide reporting in future research. Future studies are needed to examine potential correlations between kinetic parameters and PROMs.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40634-021-00397-0.

Synovial fluid concentrations of matrix Metalloproteinase-3 and Interluekin-6 following anterior cruciate ligament injury associate with gait biomechanics 6 months following reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To compare gait biomechanics 6 months following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) between patients with the highest and lowest concentrations of synovial fluid (SF) interleukin-6 (IL-6) and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3), as well as compared to uninjured controls.

DESIGN

SF concentrations of IL-6 and MMP-3 were collected 7 ± 4 days post injury in 38 ACL injured patients (55% female, 21±4yrs, 25.3 ± 5.2BMI). ACL injured individuals were stratified into the lowest and highest quartiles based on IL-6 (IL-6_Lowest and IL-6_Highest) and MMP-3 (MMP-3_Lowest and MMP-3_Highest) concentrations. Gait biomechanics were collected on the injured limb 6 months post-ACLR and in 38 uninjured controls (50% female, 21±3yrs, 23.8 ± 2.8BMI). Functional analyses of variance were used to compare vertical ground reaction force (vGRF), knee flexion angle (KFA), and internal knee extension moment (KEM) waveforms throughout stance phase of gait to determine the proportions of stance differing between limbs and groups.

RESULTS

Compared to uninjured controls, IL-6_High and MMP-3_High ACL subgroups demonstrated lesser vGRF (largest differences: IL-6, 7.88%BW; MMP-3, 11.05%BW) during early-stance and greater vGRF (largest differences: IL-6, 6.21%BW; MMP-3, 5.85%BW) in mid-stance, lesser KFA (largest differences: IL-6, 3.11°; MMP-3, 3.72°) and lesser KEM (largest differences: IL-6, 0.96%BW•m; MMP-3, 1.07%BW•m) in early-stance, as well as greater KFA in mid-stance (largest differences: IL-6, 1.5°; MMP-3, 2.95°).

CONCLUSIONS

High SF concentrations of a proinflammatory cytokine and a degradative enzyme early post-ACL injury are associated with aberrant gait biomechanics in the injured limb at 6 months post-ACLR (i.e., lesser vGRF, KFA and KEM) linked to posttraumatic osteoarthritis development.

Effects of a neuromuscular training program using external focus attention cues in male athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial

Background

Athletes who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction often exhibit persistent altered biomechanics and impaired function. Neuromuscular training programs appear to be effective for reducing high-risk landing mechanics and preventing primary ACL injuries; however, there have been few attempts to examine their effects in athletes who have undergone ACL reconstruction. The purpose of our study was to examine the effects of a neuromuscular training program that emphasizes external focus of attention cuing on biomechanics, knee proprioception, and patient-reported function in athletes who had undergone ACL reconstruction and completed conventional post-operative rehabilitation.

Methods

Twenty-four male athletes who had undergone primary, unilateral, hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction and completed conventional post-operative rehabilitation were randomly allocated to an experimental group (n = 12) who took part in an 8-week neuromuscular training program or a control group (n = 12) who continued a placebo program. The neuromuscular training program included lower extremity strengthening and plyometric exercises, balance training, and movement pattern re-training. Biomechanics during single-leg landing, knee proprioception, and patient-reported function were assessed before and after the 8-week training period.

Results

Athletes in the experimental group demonstrated increased trunk, hip, and knee flexion angles and decreased knee abduction, internal rotation angles and knee valgus during landing following the intervention. Further, the experimental group decreased their peak knee extension and abduction moments and vertical ground reaction force on landing post-intervention. International Knee Documentation Committee questionnaire (IKDC) scores increased in the experimental group following training. The control group demonstrated no changes in any variable over the same time period.

Conclusions

Neuromuscular training with external focus of attention cueing improved landing biomechanics in patients after ACL reconstruction. Neuromuscular training programs beneficially mitigate second ACL injury risk factors and should be emphasized during and after traditional post-operative rehabilitation.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials using the IRCT website with ID number of, IRCT20180412039278N1 “Prospectively registered” at 21/12/2018.