Atopic dermatitis guidelines: Diagnosis, systemic therapy, and adjunctive care

Association between preterm birth and asthma and atopic dermatitis in preschool children: a nationwide population-based study

Asthma and atopic dermatitis (AD) are representative chronic diseases in childhood. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preterm birth on the incidence and severity of asthma and AD in children, as well as to identify neonatal risk factors for asthma and AD. We used health claims data recorded between 2007 and 2014 in the Korean National Health Insurance Service database. We recruited 2,224,476 infants born between 2007 and 2014 and divided them into three groups: 3518 of extremely preterm (EP) infants (< 28 weeks of gestational age (GA)), 82,579 of other preterm (OP) infants (28-36 weeks of GA), and 2,138,379 of full-term (FT) infants (> 37 weeks of GA). We defined asthma as > 3 episodes of clinical visits in a year before 6 years of age, early asthma as onset at < 2 years of age, and severe asthma as > 1 event of status asthmaticus or admission to a hospital via an emergency room. AD was defined as ≥ 3 diagnoses in a year before 6 years of age, early AD as onset at < 2 years of age, and severe AD as prescription of high-potency topical steroids or immunosuppressants. An association of preterm birth with asthma and AD was assessed using inverse probability of treatment-weighted multivariable Cox regression analysis. Cardiorespiratory conditions, such as respiratory distress syndrome, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, patent ductus arteriosus, and pulmonary hypertension, significantly increased the risk of asthma. Specifically, bronchopulmonary dysplasia emerged as a significant risk factor for both severe and early-onset asthma (odds ratio (OR) 1.36, 95% CI 1.21-1.37 for severe asthma; OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30-1.85 for early asthma), while it was associated with a decreased risk of AD (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.92). Neonatal sepsis, jaundice, and retinopathy of prematurity were also identified as significant risk factors for later asthma. A stepwise increase in the risk of asthma with an increasing degree of prematurity was observed, with the OP group showing an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of 1.24 (95% CI: 1.22-1.26) and the EP group showing an aHR of 1.51 (95% CI: 1.41-1.63). Conversely, preterm birth was inversely associated with the risk of AD, with aHRs of 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.79) for the OP group and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.87-0.89) for the EP group. Conclusion Preterm children have a significantly higher risk of asthma and lower risk of AD, with cardiorespiratory conditions significantly increasing the risk of asthma. Thus, we highlight the need for targeted respiratory management strategies for this high-risk population. What is Known: •Asthma and atopic dermatitis are prevalent chronic diseases in childhood, reducing the quality of life of children. •Preterm birth was associated with an increased risk of asthma, but few large nationwide studies. •Research on the relationship between preterm birth and pediatric atopic dermatitis is controversial, with few large nationwide studies. What is New: • Preterm children, especially born before 28 weeks of gestational age, had a significantly higher risk of asthma and lower risk of atopic dermatitis. • Cardiorespiratory comorbidities such as RDS, BPD, PDA, and pulmonary hypertension in neonatal period are prominent risk factors for asthma. • Preterm children are vulnerable to both early-onset and severe asthma.

The wide variety of methotrexate dosing regimens for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: a systematic review

Background:Methotrexate is an off-label therapy for atopic dermatitis. A lack of consensus on dosing regimens poses a risk of underdosing and ineffective treatment or overdosing and increased risk of side effects. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on dosing regimens.Materials and methods:A literature search was conducted, screening all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and guidelines published up to 6 July 2023, in the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases.Results:Five RCTs and 21 guidelines were included. RCTs compared methotrexate with other treatments rather than different methotrexate dosing regimens. The start and maintenance doses in RCTs varied between 7.5-15 mg/week and 14.5-25 mg/week, respectively. Despite varied dosing, all RCTs demonstrated efficacy in improving atopic dermatitis signs and symptoms. Guidelines exhibited substantial heterogeneity but predominantly proposed starting doses of 5-15 mg/week for adults and 10-15 mg/m2/week for children. Maintenance doses suggested were 7.5-25 mg/week for adults and 0.2-0.7 mg/kg/week for children. One guideline suggested a test dose and nearly half advised folic acid supplementation.Conclusion:This systematic review highlights the lack of methotrexate dosing guidelines for atopic dermatitis. It identifies commonly recommended and utilized dosing regimens, serving as a valuable resource for clinicians prescribing methotrexate off-label and providing input for an upcoming consensus study.

Disease burden and patient characteristics associated with systemic therapy utilization among adults with atopic dermatitis: data from CorEvitas Atopic Dermatitis Registry

BACKGROUND

The decision to initiate advanced systemics in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) is complex.

OBJECTIVES

To explore disease burden and clinical characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe AD and identify characteristics associated with initiating new systemics.

METHODS

Data from prospective, longitudinal, non-interventional CorEvitas AD Registry were evaluated. Differences in demographic and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, disease severity (vIGA-AD™; body surface area (BSA); Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI); SCORing AD [SCORAD]), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed between systemic and non-systemic therapy groups.

RESULTS

Of 883 patients, 673 were newly prescribed systemics and 210 were not. Non-systemic therapy group had higher than expected rates of severe disease at enrollment based on vIGA-AD = 4 (39%), mean BSA involvement (31%), and mean EASI (19). PROs for non-systemic therapy group indicated elevated burden from AD on quality of life and poor disease control. SCORAD, peak pruritus in the past 24 h, history of biologics, and facial pallor, were significantly associated with initiation of systemics at enrollment.

CONCLUSION

While disease burden likely influences the initiation of systemic therapy, many patients with significant burden are not treated with systemics for unclear reasons. Further research is needed to identify other factors, beyond disease severity, that influence this decision.

Lebrikizumab monotherapy impacts on quality of life scores through improved itch and sleep interference in two Phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Lebrikizumab improved itch, interference of itch on sleep, and quality of life (QoL) in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD), in two Phase 3 trials at 16 weeks compared to placebo.

OBJECTIVES

We assess improvements in itch and sleep interference due to itch and their impact on QoL measurements after treatment.

METHODS

Data were analyzed from ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967) in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. QoL was evaluated using Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16 in patients (>16 years of age) who were itch responders/non-responders (defined as ≥4-point improvement in Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale) or Sleep-Loss Scale responders/non-responders (defined as ≥2-point improvement in itch interference on sleep).

RESULTS

In ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, significantly greater proportions of itch responders had a clinically meaningful improvement in measures related to QoL (DLQI scores (0/1), ≤5 DLQI total score and ≥4-point DLQI improvement) compared to itch non-responders. In both studies, a significantly greater proportion of Sleep-Loss Scale responders, reported a DLQI score of (0/1), DLQI total score of ≤5 and DLQI improvement of ≥4 points compared to Sleep-Loss Scale non-responders.

CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in itch and sleep interference due to itch is associated with improvement in the QoL of patients after treatment with lebrikizumab for moderate-to-severe AD.

ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT04146363 (ADvocate1) and NCT04178967 (ADvocate2).

International consensus on methotrexate dosing for patients with atopic dermatitis: An eDelphi study

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread off-label use of methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), there is limited high-quality evidence on dosing regimens and existing guidelines do not provide clear recommendations regarding dosing strategies.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to achieve international consensus among AD experts to standardize the dosing regimen for MTX treatment in adults and children with AD.

METHODS

An electronic Delphi (eDelphi) study was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022. Recruitment was conducted through dermatology societies and AD interest groups. Participation was open to dermatologists and dermatology residents experienced in treating AD patients with MTX. The study consisted of three online rounds. The first round was informed by a systematic review of relevant literature, and subsequent rounds were adjusted based on the results of the previous round. Participants voted on 19 proposals using a 9-point scale (1-3 disagree, 4-6 neither agree nor disagree, 7-9 agree). Consensus was achieved when at least 70% of participants agreed, and less than 15% disagreed. Proposals that did not reach consensus in the first three rounds were discussed in a consensus meeting, where consensus was defined as less than 30% disagreement.

RESULTS

In total, 152 participants completed Round 1, 104 (68%) completed all survey rounds, and 43 (28%) joined the consensus meeting. Consensus was achieved on 7 proposals in Round 1, 4 in Round 2 and 6 in Round 3. The final 2 proposals reached consensus during the consensus meeting. Consensus topics include test dose, start dose, maximum dose, administration route, dosing schedule, management of stopping treatment, treatment duration and folic acid supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

This eDelphi study achieved consensus on 19 proposals related to MTX dosing for adults and children with AD. These results aim to guide prescribing decisions and encourage a standardized global approach to MTX use in AD.

Antioxidant Activity and the Therapeutic Effect of Sinomenine Hydrochloride-Loaded Liposomes-in-Hydrogel on Atopic Dermatitis

Sinomenine hydrochloride is an excellent drug with anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immune-regulatory, and other functions. Atopic dermatitis is an inherited allergic inflammation that causes itchiness, redness, and swelling in the affected area, which can have a significant impact on the life of the patient. There are many therapeutic methods for atopic dermatitis, and sinomenine with immunomodulatory activity might be effective in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. In this study, the atopic dermatitis model was established in experimental mice, and physical experiments were carried out on the mice. In the experiment, sinomenine hydrochloride liposomes-in-hydrogel as a new preparation was selected for delivery. In this case, liposomes were dispersed in the colloidal hydrogel on a mesoscopic scale and could provide specific transfer properties. The results showed that the sinomenine hydrochloride-loaded liposomes-in-hydrogel system could effectively inhibit atopic dermatitis.

Long noncoding RNA MALAT1 in dermatologic disorders: a comprehensive review

Dermatologic disorders, affecting the integumentary system, involve diverse molecular mechanisms such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, inflammation and immune responses. Long noncoding RNAs, particularly Metastasis-Associated Lung Adenocarcinoma Transcript 1 (MALAT1), are crucial regulators of gene expression. MALAT1 influences inflammatory responses, immune cell function and signaling pathways, impacting various physiological and pathological processes, including dermatologic disorders. Dysregulation of MALAT1 is observed in skin conditions like psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and systemic lupus erythematosus. However, its precise role remains unclear. This review consolidates knowledge on MALAT1's impact on skin biology and pathology, emphasizing its potential diagnostic and therapeutic implications in dermatologic conditions.

Lebrikizumab Improves Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease for which signs and symptoms have a negative impact on a patient's quality of life (QoL) and mental health. Here, we assess the impact of lebrikizumab on QoL and mental health after 16 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

METHODS

Data were analyzed over 16 weeks from two separate phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled, monotherapy trials (ADvocate1 and ADvocate2). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the following measures: Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), EQ-5D-5L visual analogue scale (VAS), EQ-5D-5L index scores (UK and US), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety, and PROMIS Depression.

RESULTS

Treatment with lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks in two studies led to statistically significant improvements (based on nominal p values) versus placebo in DLQI since week 4 (the first timepoint assessed) for the following measures: change from baseline in DLQI total score (ADvocate1 - 7.8 vs - 2.8; ADvocate2 - 7.3 vs - 3.9), proportion of patients with DLQI ≥ 4-point improvement (ADvocate1 69.5% vs 36.2%; ADvocate2 60.5% vs 42.6%), DLQI total score ≤ 5 (ADvocate1 36.7% vs 8.8%; ADvocate2 29.6% vs 10.8%), and DLQI (0, 1) (ADvocate1 12.3% vs 1.7%; ADvocate2 9.2% vs 1.7%). Improvements in DLQI measures, EQ-5D-5L index scores (UK and US), and EQ-5D-5L VAS were sustained through week 16. Additionally, lebrikizumab improved PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Depression scores, and improvements were higher in patients with at least a mild score (≥ 55) versus placebo for PROMIS Anxiety (ADvocate1 - 7.43 vs - 1.51; ADvocate2 - 4.95 vs - 0.82) and PROMIS Depression (ADvocate1 - 7.42 vs - 2.46; ADvocate2 - 4.28 vs - 2.00).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with monotherapy 250 mg lebrikizumab for 16 weeks provided clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes related to QoL and mental health for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Lebrikizumab-treated patients reported improvements in DLQI as early as week 4, the first measure since baseline.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration NCT04146363 (ADvocate1) and NCT04178967 (ADvocate2).

Vitamin D level is inversely related to allergen sensitization for risking atopic dermatitis in early childhood

Background

There are few studies concerning the impact of serum vitamin D status on the risk of allergen sensitization and atopic dermatitis (AD) during early childhood.

Method

Children with AD and age-matched healthy controls (HC) were prospectively enrolled at age 0.5, 2, and 4 years. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25[OH]D) level was measured using Elecsys Vitamin D Total assay. The study utilized the ImmunoCAP assay to analyze specific IgE for food and inhalant allergens, along with total serum IgE levels. It explored the connection between vitamin D levels and allergen sensitization, as well as their influence on AD at different ages.

Results

A total of 222 children including 95 (59 AD and 36 HC), 66 (37 AD and 29 HC), and 61 (32 AD and 29 HC) children were classified at age 0.5, 2, and 4 years, respectively. In children with AD, there was a significantly lower vitamin D level at age 2 and 4, but a significantly higher prevalence of food and mite sensitization at all ages in comparison with HC (P < 0.001). Vitamin D level was found to be inversely related to the prevalence of allergen sensitization at age 4 (P < 0.05). However, vitamin D level appeared to have high importance for allergen sensitization at all ages and AD at age 2 and 4 years.

Conclusion

Vitamin D deficiency is strongly associated with heightened prevalence of allergen sensitization, potentially increasing the susceptibility to AD in early childhood.

Unraveling the skin; a comprehensive review of atopic dermatitis, current understanding, and approaches

Atopic dermatitis, also known as atopic eczema, is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by red pruritic skin lesions, xerosis, ichthyosis, and skin pain. Among the social impacts of atopic dermatitis are difficulties and detachment in relationships and social stigmatization. Additionally, atopic dermatitis is known to cause sleep disturbance, anxiety, hyperactivity, and depression. Although the pathological process behind atopic dermatitis is not fully known, it appears to be a combination of epidermal barrier dysfunction and immune dysregulation. Skin is the largest organ of the human body which acts as a mechanical barrier to toxins and UV light and a natural barrier against water loss. Both functions face significant challenges due to atopic dermatitis. The list of factors that can potentially trigger or contribute to atopic dermatitis is extensive, ranging from genetic factors, family history, dietary choices, immune triggers, and environmental factors. Consequently, prevention, early clinical diagnosis, and effective treatment may be the only resolutions to combat this burdensome disease. Ensuring safe and targeted drug delivery to the skin layers, without reaching the systemic circulation is a promising option raised by nano-delivery systems in dermatology. In this review, we explored the current understanding and approaches of atopic dermatitis and outlined a range of the most recent therapeutics and dosage forms brought by nanotechnology. This review was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect databases.

Development of a Patient Journey Map for Improving Patient Experience and Quality of Atopic Dermatitis Care

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that affects both children and adults. AD increases the risk of developing comorbidities like asthma, allergic rhinitis and food allergies. AD patients face difficulties, including itching, lack of effective treatments, lack of funding and discomfort in seeking a diagnosis or treatment. This study aims to identify the main barriers and opportunities to improve the experience of patients with AD and provide high-quality care.

METHODS

Patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals were recruited from the Dermatology Department at Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital (Madrid, Spain). Interviews with patients, caregivers and professionals were performed. Participants used storyboards to depict their preferred scenarios for improving healthcare interactions and create a Patient Journey Map.

RESULTS

A total of 15 participants were included in the study. Early symptoms of AD were commonly described as undefined stages. As symptoms worsened, patients and caregivers expressed uncertainty and frustration. Patients became concerned about AD after their first serious flare and started experiencing intense itching, eczema, wounds, shedding or asthma. Topical corticosteroids were used to manage flares, but their effectiveness diminished over time, causing further frustration. Because of the ineffectiveness of their initial treatments, dermatologists observed that patients tended to downplay symptoms and how they affected their quality of life. The specialized treatment of severe AD significantly changed patients' emotional states. Despite AD's chronic nature, patients strived to enjoy remission periods and cope with flares. Psychological and emotional support was crucial for patients and caregivers, a need addressed by the Patients' School initiative at HUPHM hospital.

CONCLUSION

The severity of AD has a profound impact on patients' lives. Patient and caregiver emotional and social needs can be met by adequate communication, access to effective treatments and comprehensive psychological support.

Short-term efficacy and safety of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors for patients with atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In recent years, biologics targeting key cytokines and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety outcomes for atopic dermatitis (AD) therapy. To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of AD therapy involving biologics, JAK inhibitors, and their combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) for patients with AD, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. Using eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of 12 or 16 weeks of treatment with systemic medications and 4 weeks of topical treatment for AD.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to October 25, 2023. English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of 12 or 16 weeks of treatment with systemic medications and 4 weeks of topical treatment for AD were included. Titles, abstracts, and articles were screened in duplicate. Of 7261 citations, 37 studies were included. The data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and the outcomes were measured by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), the pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), as well as instances of adverse events (AE), and serious AE (SAE), which were presented as risk ratio (RR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). The efficacy of the biological therapies was analyzed with the percentage of patients who have achieved EASI 75, EASI 90, IGA 0/1 and pruritus NRS4, while the safety of treatments was evaluated in terms of the number of patients who had ≥1 AE and who had at least one SAE.

Results

A total of 37 studies with 43 cohorts that examined 9 medications and placebo and involved 18172 participants were included. Compared with the placebo, all biologics and JAK inhibitors were associated with a higher response rate in efficacy outcomes, while systematic administration was presented by dupilumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks with superior improvement in EASI 90 (RR 9.50, 95 % CI 2.31-39.03) and IGA0/1 (RR 17.00, 95 % CI 2.33-123.78), upadacitinib 30 mg once daily in EASI 75 (RR 5.14, 95 % CI 4.20-6.31) and Pruritus NRS4 (RR 5.73, 95 % CI 4.44-7.39), and external use was presented by ruxolitinib 1.5 % twice daily orally in EASI 75 (RR 4.14, 95 % CI 3.06-5.61) and Pruritus NRS4 (RR 4.08, 95 % CI 2.86-5.81), and most of doses led to a better safety profile. Most doses of baricitinib, dupilumab, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib in combination with TCS demonstrated good efficacy as compared with the control groups (placebo + TCS). However, patients receiving baricitinib at a dosage of 2 mg daily (RR 1.23, 95 % CI 1.02-1.49) and 4 mg daily (RR 1.39, 95 % CI 1.22-1.58) in combination with TCS, exhibited a higher incidence of one or more SAE as compared with those taking placebo + TCS.

Conclusion

Our research has revealed that ruxolitinib and dupilumab are effective and safe treatments for mild to moderate AD and moderate to severe AD, respectively. Additionally, the combination of dupilumab and TCS demonstrates greater efficacy and safety compared to baricitinib, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib with TCS as a background treatment for moderate to severe AD. We suggest that the use of topical JAK inhibitors could be a potential alternative to TCS when used in combination with systemic medications, as a novel approach to treat AD. Insufficient different data sources caused by partial interventions were only mentioned in a few articles and low event rates in safety analyses may lead to the results being biased. Further studies directly comparing existing and novel treatments are needed and will be included in forthcoming updates of this review. Our findings could form a useful foundation for developing a new generation of treatment guidelines for AD.

Atopic Dermatitis: A Common Pediatric Diagnosis That Is Not Just Another Rash

Emergency nurse practitioners are expected to assess and manage a variety of patients. These patients may present with urgent care-type complaints to severe life-threatening illnesses or injuries. For some, dermatological problems can sometimes be just as challenging as a critically ill patient. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one, if not, the most common chronic inflammatory disease. Its presentation can vary depending on the age of the patient, the patient's skin tone, and other comorbidities. Patients often seek emergency care related to the condition itself or associated complications. This article includes a review of the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and standard management of AD. Finally, the potential complications of AD are discussed. A better understanding of AD will allow emergency nurse practitioners to properly identify and treat this chronic condition, as well as its complications.

COVID-19-Associated Disease Course Is Shortened in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients Receiving Dupilumab Treatment: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

Previous studies suggest that allergic diseases may be a protective factor in SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, data regarding the impact of dupilumab, a widely used immunomodulatory medication, on COVID-19 in an allergic population are very limited. To investigate the incidence and severity of COVID-19 among moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) patients treated with dupilumab, a retrospective cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients with moderate-to-severe AD who presented at the Department of Allergy of Tongji Hospital from 15 January 2023 to 31 January 2023. Healthy individuals matched for gender and age were also enrolled as a control. All subjects were asked about their demographic characteristics, past medical history, COVID-19 vaccination history, and medications, as well as the presence and duration of individual COVID-19-related symptoms. A total of 159 moderate-to-severe AD patients and 198 healthy individuals were enrolled in the study. Among the AD patients, 97 patients were treated with dupilumab, and 62 patients did not receive any biologicals or systemic treatments (topical treatment group). The proportions of people who were not infected with COVID in the dupilumab treatment group, topical treatment group and healthy control group were 10.31%, 9.68% and 19.19%, respectively (p = 0.057). There was no significant difference in COVID-19-related symptom scores among all groups (p = 0.059). The hospitalization rates were 3.58% in the topical treatment group and 1.25% in the healthy control group, and no patient was hospitalized in the dupilumab treatment group (p = 0.163). Compared with healthy control group and topical treatment group, the dupilumab treatment group had the shortest COVID-19-associated disease duration (dupilumab treatment group, 4.15 ± 2.85 d vs. topical treatment group, 5.43 ± 3.15 d vs. healthy control group, 6.09 ± 4.29 d; p = 0.001). Among the AD patients treated with dupilumab for different times, there was no appreciable difference (<0.5 year group, 5 ± 3.62 d vs. 0.5-1 year group, 4.84 ± 2.58 d vs. >1 year group, 2.8 ± 1.32 d; p = 0.183). Dupilumab treatment shortened the duration of COVID-19 in patients with moderate-to-severe AD. AD patients can continue their dupilumab treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The mechanism of oxymatrine on atopic dermatitis in mice based on SOCS1/JAK-STAT3 pathway

Based on the suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 (SOCS1)/Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway, the mechanism of oxymatrine in the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) was preliminarily explored in this study. C57BL/6 mice were induced to establish AD model by smearing carbotriol (MC903) on their back. The AD mice were randomly divided into model group, oxymatrine groups with three dosages (25, 50 and 100 mg/kg), (n = 10). Oxymatrine groups were intragastric administered once daily for 14 days. The same volume of saline was given in the normal control group and model group once daily for 14 days. Subsequently, HE staining was used to observe the pathological changes of skin tissue, ELISA was used to detect the levels of serum inflammatory factors including interleukin-4, 6 and 17 (IL-4, IL-6, and IL-17), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and immunoglobulin E (IgE). Immunohistochemistry was used to detect the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 and CD3 in skin tissue, and Western blotting was used to detect the proteins in suppressor of cytokine signaling 1/JAK-STAT3 pathway. Compared with the normal control group, the pathological damage of mice in the model group, such as skin hyperplasia, edema, congestion and inflammatory infiltration, aggravated increased significantly. And the expression of serum inflammatory factors, CD3 positive expression and JAK-STAT3 pathway protein in the model group were increased (p < .05), and the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 protein (p < .05) was decreased. Compared with the model group, the above pathological damage of the mice was reduced, and the serum inflammatory factors, JAK-STAT3 pathway protein, and CD3 positive expression were decreased as a dose-dependant manner (p < .05), and the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 protein was increased as a dose-dependent manner (p < .05). Oxymatrine can improve the skin inflammation symptoms of AD mice by up regulating the expression of suppressor of cytokine signaling 1, inhibiting the activation of JAK-STAT3 pathway and blocking the activation of T lymphocytes.

Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells for refractory inflammatory and immune skin diseases

Inflammatory and immunological skin diseases such as psoriasis, systemic sclerosis, dermatomyositis and atopic dermatitis, whose abnormal skin manifestations not only affected life quality but also caused social discrimination, have been wildly concerned. Complex variables such as hereditary predisposition, racial differences, age and gender can influence the prevalence and therapeutic options. The population of patients with unsatisfactory curative effects under current therapies is growing, it's advisable to seek novel and advanced therapies that are less likely to cause systemic damage. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been proven with therapeutic benefits in tissue regeneration, self-renewal and differentiation abilities when treating refractory skin disorders in preclinical and clinical studies. Here we highlighted the immune modulation and inflammation suppression of MSCs in skin diseases, summarized current studies, research progress and related clinical trials, hoping to strengthen the confidence of promising MSCs therapy in future clinical application.

Serum Vitamin D Level and Efficacy of Vitamin D Supplementation in Children with Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

The relationship between vitamin D and atopic dermatitis (AD) is controversial. This meta-analysis is aimed at exploring vitamin D level and its deficiency in pediatric AD and at evaluating the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation.

Methods

PubMed, Medline, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials were searched. Binary variables and continuous variables were measured by odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals, respectively. The modified Jadad scale, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Cochrane's bias risk tools were used to evaluate study quality and the risk of bias of eligible studies, respectively.

Results

A total of 22 literature were included in the analysis. Serum 25 (OH) D level in pediatric AD patients was significantly lower than that of the control group with a combined MD value of -8.18 (95% CI: -13.15, -3.22). Patients with AD were more prone to develop vitamin D deficiency with a combined OR value of 2.17 (95% CI: 1.15, 4.11). According to the score of SCORAD, the level of serum 25 (OH) D level in patients with severe AD was significantly lower than that in patients with mild AD (combined MD = 9.23, 95% CI: 6.92, 11.55). Both self-control studies and randomized controlled trials showed improved SCORAD score and EASI score after vitamin D supplementation.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis showed lower serum 25 (OH) D level and increased risk of vitamin D deficiency in pediatric AD patients as compared with healthy controls. The serum 25 (OH) D level in severe AD patients was significantly lower than that in the mild AD patients. The SCORAD and EASI score improved after vitamin D supplementation, suggesting its beneficial effect to AD patients. At the same time, more homogeneous studies are needed to reduce confounding factors and further evaluate the impact of vitamin D treatment on the outcome of AD patients.

Managing Atopic Dermatitis with Lebrikizumab - The Evidence to Date

Atopic dermatitis is a prevalent, inflammatory skin disease that presents with an eczematous, itchy rash. As of late, there have been many emerging monoclonal antibody inhibitor and small molecule therapies that have changed the course of eczema treatment. One of the treatments in the pipeline for atopic dermatitis is interleukin 13 monoclonal antibody inhibitor, lebrikizumab. As interleukin 13 has been identified as a pro-inflammatory cytokine in the immunological cascade of eczema, it is thought that lebrikizumab can be a great treatment choice for patients with atopic dermatitis. Lebrikizumab is currently being investigated in several studies. Thus far, lebrikizumab for the treatment of eczema has been found to be efficacious; in particular, a rapid response of pruritus improvement has been demonstrated in as early as 2 days. Additionally, it is well tolerated and has an acceptable safety profile, with reports suggesting that are decreased risks of infection when compared to dupilumab. In this review, we aim to summarize the current understanding of lebrikizumab in terms of the mechanism of action, preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and metabolism, efficacy and safety, and drug indications.

Targeting therapeutic approaches and highlighting the potential role of nanotechnology in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic as well as widespread skin disease which has significant influence on the life attributes of affected people and their families. Systemic immunosuppressive drugs can be utilised for effective care of disease, although they are often prescribed for rigorous disruption or disease that is complicated to manage. Therefore, topical applications of corticosteroids are considered the primary pharmacologic therapies for atopic dermatitis, and research recommends that these medications might be helpful in preventing disease flare-ups. However, topical medicine administration to deeper layers of skin is challenging because of the skin anatomic barrier that restricts deeper drug permeation, and also due to barrier function abnormalities in atopic dermatitis skin, which might result in systemic drug absorption, provoking systemic consequences. Hence, effective management of atopic dermatitis needs new, effective, safe and targeted treatments. Therefore, nanotechnology-based topical therapeutics have attracted much interest nowadays because of their tendency to increase drug diffusion and bioavailability along with enormous drug targeting potential to affected cells, and, thereby, reducing the adverse effects of medications. In this review, we mention different symptoms of atopic dermatitis, and provide an overview of the different triggering factors causing atopic dermatitis, with emphasis on its epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and diagnostic, and preventive measures. This review discusses existing therapeutics for treating atopic dermatitis, and the newer approaches as well as the current classical pharmacotherapy of atopic dermatitis against new nanoparticle skin delivery systems. This review has also briefly summarised the recent patents and clinical status of therapeutic modalities for atopic dermatitis.

Annoying Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Review

Skin is an important organ that mainly functions as a barrier. Skin diseases can damage a person's self-confidence and reduce their willingness to socialize, as well as their social behavior and willingness. When the skin appearance is abnormal, in addition to affecting the quality of life, it often leads to personal, social, and psychological dysfunction and even induces depression. Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are common chronic skin diseases. Their prevalence in the world is 3-10%, and there is an increasing trend year by year. These congenital or acquired factors cause the dysfunction of the immune system and then destroy the barrier function of the skin. Because these patients are flooded with a variety of inflammatory mediators, this causes skin cells to be in chronic inflammation. Therefore, psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are also considered systemic chronic inflammatory diseases. In the healthcare systems of developed countries, it is unavoidable to spend high costs to relieve symptoms of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients, because psoriasis and atopic dermatitis have a great influence on individuals and society. Giving a lot of attention and developing effective treatment methods are the topics that the medical community must work on together. Therefore, we used a narrative review manuscript to discuss pathogenesis, clinical classification, incidence, and treatment options, including topical medication, systemic therapeutics, immunosuppressive medication for psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis, as well as also comparing the differences between these two diseases. We look forward to providing readers with comprehensive information on psoriasis and atopic dermatitis through this review article.

Atopic dermatitis in psychodermatology: a concise review for dermatologists

Atopic Dermatitis (AD) is a chronic disease of the skin with significant pruritus and phases of exacerbation and remission. The hallmarks of AD are changes in the epithelial barrier and chronic inflammation. This condition is associated with an increased risk of developing mental disorders such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. It has been proposed that psychological stress may impact on immunological factors with an up-regulation of mediating neuropeptides at the level of central nervous system and secondary involvement of endocrine glands, peripheral nervous system, and immune resident skin cells. This article provides a concise review for dermatologists on the psychodermatology of AD, in order to highlight the putative common pathways between the dermatologic and mental health issues in this illness.

On which evidence can we rely when prescribing off-label methotrexate in dermatological practice? - a systematic review with GRADE approach

If an authorized drug is prescribed for a use that is not described in the Summary of Product Characteristics, this is defined as 'off-label use.' Methotrexate is often used off-label for dermatological indications. Off-label use is permitted if physicians can justify the treatment based on scientific evidence available to them. Our objective here was therefore to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the dermatological off-label use of methotrexate in a systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for studies for evidence on the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the off-label use of methotrexate in dermatological indications up to November 2019. We used the GRADE system to rate the quality of the evidence. The search retrieved 34,583 hits of which 3566 were selected after the title and abstract screening. After the full-text screening, 143 studies were included, which involved 3688 patients in total. We found low-quality evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the off-label use of methotrexate in 31 dermatological diseases. To optimize the quality of evidence to support off-label use, we need high-quality studies in which well-characterized patients are treated with standardized treatments regimens using well-validated outcomes relevant to patients and physicians.

The Molecule Sensitized Pattern of Atopic Dermatitis Patients Who Co-Sensitized to Shrimp, Cockroaches, Crab and House Dust Mites

This study investigated the molecule sensitized pattern of atopic dermatitis patients who co-sensitized to shrimp, cockroaches, crab and house dust mites allergens and promoted the development of clinical accurate diagnosis and treatment.

Alterations in mental health and quality of life in patients with skin disorders: a narrative review

The presence of lesions in visible areas of skin may cause emotional troubles in patients, including low self-worth, embarrassment, sorrow, and social isolation. Those alterations may predispose to psychiatric disorders such as anxiety, depression, and even suicidal ideation, severely affecting patients' health state and quality of life (QoL). In this article, we focus on dermatologic patients that present with secondary mental health alterations. Thus, we offer a detailed description of mental disorders observed in patients with acne vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, ichthyosis, vitiligo, and hidradenitis suppurativa. Moreover, we point out the relationship between the severity of the cutaneous symptoms with mental illnesses and QoL decline. Our objective was to highlight the importance of mental health care for patients with skin diseases. The impact of skin alterations on the mental health of dermatological patients should be a central concern. Likewise, the timely identification and treatment of mental disorders are essential for the comprehensive management of these skin diseases.

Repurposing Belinostat for Alleviation of Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly prevalent chronic inflammatory skin disease that is characterized by intense pruritus, seriously affecting patients' quality of life. Its pathophysiology, which involves both the adaptive and innate immune responses as well as skin barrier defects, is still poorly understood. We recently identified a microRNA, miR-335, as a key driver of keratinocyte differentiation and cornification, which is essential for the establishment of a healthy skin barrier. However, expression of miR-335 is lost in AD, leading to barrier defect. We further demonstrated how belinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, can effectively restore miR-335 and resolve the barrier defect in a dry skin model. Here, in this commentary, we highlight the role of belinostat in the treatment of AD and discuss the need for more research into crosstalk between epigenetic and non-coding RNA-based regulation, as well as possible therapeutic strategies targeting the epigenome.

Efficacy of Individualized Homeopathic Medicines in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis in Adults: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Preliminary Trial

INTRODUCTION

Individualized homeopathy (IH) in atopic dermatitis (AD) remained under-researched.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at evaluating efficacy of IH in AD.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, short-term, preliminary trial was conducted in an Indian homeopathy hospital. Patients were randomized to either IH (n = 30) or identical-looking placebo (n = 30) using computerized randomization and allocation. Outcomes were patient-oriented scoring of AD (PO-SCORAD; primary end point), Dermatological Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, and AD burden score for adults (ADBSA; secondary end points), measured monthly for 3 months. An intention-to-treat sample was analyzed after adjusting baseline differences.

RESULTS

On PO-SCORAD, improvement was higher in IH against placebo, but nonsignificant statistically (pmonth 1 = 0.433, pmonth 2 = 0.442, pmonth 3 = 0.229). Secondary outcomes were also nonsignificant - both DLQI and ADBSA (p > 0.05). Four adverse events (diarrhea, injury, common cold) were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a small, but nonsignificant direction of effect towards homeopathy, which renders the trial inconclusive. A properly powered robust trial is indicated.

The Efficacy and Safety of Abrocitinib as a Treatment Option for Atopic Dermatitis: A Short Report of the Clinical Data

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, pruritic, inflammatory skin disease that predominantly affects children. However, it can persist in adulthood and/or start at older ages. Both dysfunction of the epidermal barrier and immune dysregulation are known to play a role in the pathogenesis of AD. In the last years, numerous studies showed that Janus kinase (JAK) enzymes have a key role in AD pathogenesis. Therefore, oral and topical JAK inhibitors are new emerging treatments for AD. We report the data relating to abrocitinib, an oral JAK1 inhibitor. For this purpose, we examined articles already published concerning, in particular, concluded clinical trials. Furthermore, we also report the design of current ongoing clinical trials. The search was carried out considering the main search engines relating to medical literature and clinical trials. From all the data we collected, abrocitinib proved to be an effective drug in significantly reducing the severity of moderate-to-severe AD when compared to placebo. Furthermore, the efficacy was similar to other well-established treatment for AD, such as dupilumab. Adverse events were generally mild; indeed, the drug was definitively suspended only in few patients.

Atopic dermatitis in specialized centers in Spain: a retrospective analysis of incidence and costs (2000-2017)

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that has substantial effects on patients' quality of life, with a prevalence between 2.2% and 17.6% worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the use of specialized care resources generated by children and adults with atopic dermatitis, and the associated direct medical costs.

METHODS

Admission details from patients admitted in specialized healthcare centers (inpatient and outpatient care) in Spain between 1 January 2000 and 31 December 2017 were analyzed in a retrospective multicentre study.

RESULTS

Records corresponded to 3036 patients, 1266 aged 5 years or younger. Comorbid conditions corresponded to skin infections and respiratory difficulties (asthma, bronchiectasis). Hospital incidence of atopic dermatitis was 5.8 per 100,000 persons, stable over the study period, and 30.0 per 100,000 in those aged 5 years and younger. Mean annual direct medical cost per patient was €2469. Overall, direct medical costs per patient increased significantly over the study period (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Hospital incidence of atopic dermatitis remained stable over the study period, which is in contrast with the increasing incidence reported by the Spanish government in primary care centers. The increase in direct medical costs of specialized care responded to the increase in treatment costs.

Effectiveness and Safety of Herbal Medicine for Atopic Dermatitis: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Objectives

Herbal medicine (HM) is attracting attention for treating atopic dermatitis (AD). This overview was conducted to summarize and critically evaluate the current systematic reviews (SRs) on HM for the treatment of AD.

Methods

Through comprehensive searches, all relevant SRs on HM for AD published until May 2020 were included. The quality of included SRs was assessed using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Moreover, original randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in the SRs were resynthesized to investigate the efficacy and safety of oral HM for AD. The quality of evidence for the main findings was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results

Nine SRs were included in this overview. HM showed significantly better efficacy in terms of total effective rate (TER), itching and sleep symptom scores, quality of life, and the dose of topical treatment used compared with placebo. HM as a monotherapy and/or an adjunctive therapy to conventional medication (CM) showed significantly better results on the efficacy, symptom relief, and some laboratory parameters related to the inflammatory response. The methodological quality was generally low. When 58 original RCTs were reanalyzed, HM showed significantly lower SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) score and higher TER than the placebo or CM. In terms of the safety profile, HM was not significantly different from the placebo and was better than CM. The quality of evidence ranged from “moderate” to “very low.”

Conclusion

The results suggested that HM as a monotherapy or an adjunctive therapy is promising for the treatment of AD. However, due to low methodological quality and low quality of evidence, further rigorous, well-designed, high-quality SRs, and RCTs are needed to make clinical recommendations on HM use.

The European TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce survey: prescribing practices in Europe for phototherapy and systemic therapy in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema

Background

For many years dermatologists have had access to few therapies for patients with moderate‐to‐severe atopic eczema (AE). New promising therapies are entering the market but conventional phototherapies and systemic therapies have more well‐known safety profiles, lower costs and wider availability.

Objectives

To provide insight into current prescribing practices of conventional phototherapy and systemic immunomodulatory therapies for adults with chronic AE, and the factors influencing these prescribing practices, before biologics and other novel therapeutics become routine clinical practice.

Methods

In this exploratory study dermatologists were invited to participate in an online survey via a mailing list of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and national societies. Data were collected on participant characteristics (including clinical practice data), the use of phototherapies and systemic therapies, and factors influencing their use.

Results

From 30 European countries, 238 out of 361 dermatologists willing to participate (65·9%) completed the survey, with 229 meeting the inclusion criteria. For phototherapy (prescribed by 84·7%), most preferred narrowband ultraviolet B as first line (80·9%) and psoralen plus ultraviolet A as second (21·6%). For systemic therapy (prescribed by 95·2%) ciclosporin (54·1%), oral corticosteroids (32·6%) and methotrexate (30·7%) were used first line. Dermatologists relied mostly on personal experience for prescribing phototherapy and systemic therapy. Azathioprine and mycophenolic acid were prescribed by only 135 (59·0%) and 85 (37·1%) participants in total, mostly due to a lack of personal experience.

Conclusions

This study provides insight into prescribing practices for conventional phototherapy and systemic therapy in Europe and shows that off‐label therapies are also preferred as first‐line choice of systemic therapy.

What is already known about this topic?

Varying prescribing practices were found for adult (in the UK) and paediatric (in Northern America and Europe) patients with moderate‐to-severe atopic eczema (AE).

Not much is known about the prescription of phototherapy and (off‐label) systemic therapy for adult patients in Europe.

Although therapies like dupilumab are promising new treatment modalities, better‐known safety profiles, lower costs and better availability are reasons to improve the evidence profile of conventional systemic therapies like ciclosporin.

What does this study add?

Prescribing practices of European dermatologists treating adult patients with moderate‐to-severe AE show diversity.

Most dermatologists prefer narrowband ultraviolet B as first‐line phototherapy, followed by psoralen plus ultraviolet A as second line.

Next to ciclosporin, which is most commonly prescribed, (off‐label) methotrexate and oral corticosteroids are also frequently used as first‐line systemic agents in chronic AE.

Lack of personal experience with azathioprine and mycophenolic acid was the most important reason against their prescription.

What are the clinical implications of the work?

The results from this study might help to improve the experience with, and prescribing of, all available conventional phototherapies and (off‐label) systemic therapies.

Guidelines developers might use these results to develop and implement treatment algorithms.

Linked Comment:Bruin‐Weller. Br J Dermatol 2020; 183:987–988.

Plain language summary available online

Trends in Atopic Dermatitis-From Standard Pharmacotherapy to Novel Drug Delivery Systems

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a predominant and deteriorating chronic inflammation of the skin, categorized by robust burning and eczematous lacerations in diverse portions of the body. AD affects about 20% of both offspring and adults worldwide. The pathophysiology of AD combines environmental, hereditary, and immunological aspects, together with skin barrier dysfunction. The procedures used to prevent the disease are the everyday usage of creams to support the restoration of the epidermal barrier. The classical treatments include the use of topical corticosteroids as a first-line therapy, but also calcineurin inhibitors, antihistamines, antibiotics, phototherapy, and also immunosuppressant drugs in severe cases of AD. Topical drug delivery to deeper skin layers is a difficult task due to the skin anatomic barrier, which limits deeper penetration of drugs. Groundbreaking drug delivery systems, based on nanoparticles (NPs), have received much attention due to their ability to improve solubility, bioavailability, diffusion, targeting to specific types of cells, and limiting the secondary effects of the drugs employed in the treatment of AD. Even so, additional studies are still required to recognize the toxicological characteristics and long-term safety of NPs. This review discusses the current classical pharmacotherapy of AD against new nanoparticle skin delivery systems and their toxicologic risks.

Managing atopic dermatitis with systemic therapies in adults and adolescents: An Australian/New Zealand narrative

With the rapid development of new, targeted therapies for the treatment of moderate/severe atopic dermatitis, it is opportune to review the available conventional systemic agents. We assess the published evidence for systemic therapies for atopic dermatitis and amalgamate this with real-world experience. Discussions are centred on when systemic therapy should be considered, which drug(s), what dose, how to sequence or combine these therapies, how long they should be continued for and what is considered success.