Polypropylene–polyester cranial prostheses prepared with CAD/CAM technology. Report of first 15 cases

Characterisation of Selected Materials in Medical Applications

Tissue engineering is an interdisciplinary field of science that has developed very intensively in recent years. The first part of this review describes materials with medical and dental applications from the following groups: metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites. Both positive and negative sides of their application are presented from the point of view of medical application and mechanical properties. A variety of techniques for the manufacture of biomedical components are presented in this review. The main focus of this work is on additive manufacturing and 3D printing, as these modern techniques have been evaluated to be the best methods for the manufacture of medical and dental devices. The second part presents devices for skull bone reconstruction. The materials from which they are made and the possibilities offered by 3D printing in this field are also described. The last part concerns dental transitional implants (scaffolds) for guided bone regeneration, focusing on polylactide-hydroxyapatite nanocomposite due to its unique properties. This section summarises the current knowledge of scaffolds, focusing on the material, mechanical and biological requirements, the effects of these devices on the human body, and their great potential for applications.

Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printing Guide for Single-Stage Skull Bone Tumor Surgery: Novel Software Workflow with Manufacturing of Prefabricated Jigs for Bone Resection and Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To describe a novel system workflow to design and manufacture patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) printing jigs for single-stage skull bone tumor excision and reconstruction and to present surgical outcomes of 14 patients.

METHODS

A specific computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing software and hardware system was set up, including a virtual surgical planning subsystem and a 3D printing-associated manufacturing subsystem. Computed tomography data of the patient's skull were used for 3D rendering of the skull and tumor. The output of patient-specific designing included a 3D printing guide for tumor resection and a 3D printing model of the bone defect after tumor excision. A polymethyl methacrylate implant was fabricated preoperatively and used for repair.

RESULTS

The specific 3D printing guide was used to design intraoperative jigs and implants for 14 patients (age range, 1-72 years) with skull bone tumors. In all cases, the cutting jig allowed precise excision of tumor and bone, and implants were exact fits for the defects created. All operative results were successful, without intraoperative or postoperative complications. Postoperative computed tomography scans were obtained for analysis. Postoperative 3D measurement of the skull symmetry index (cranial vault asymmetry index) showed significant improvement of head contour after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing system described allows definitive preoperative planning and fabrication for treatment of skull bone tumors. Apparent benefits of the method include more accurate determination of surgical margins and better oncological outcomes.

Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is becoming increasingly important in medicine and especially in surgery. The aim of the present work was to identify the advantages and disadvantages of 3D printing applied in surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of articles on 3D printing applications in surgery published between 2005 and 2015 and identified using a PubMed and EMBASE search. Studies dealing with bioprinting, dentistry, and limb prosthesis or those not conducted in a hospital setting were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 158 studies met the inclusion criteria. Three-dimensional printing was used to produce anatomic models (n = 113, 71.5%), surgical guides and templates (n = 40, 25.3%), implants (n = 15, 9.5%) and molds (n = 10, 6.3%), and primarily in maxillofacial (n = 79, 50.0%) and orthopedic (n = 39, 24.7%) operations. The main advantages reported were the possibilities for preoperative planning (n = 77, 48.7%), the accuracy of the process used (n = 53, 33.5%), and the time saved in the operating room (n = 52, 32.9%); 34 studies (21.5%) stressed that the accuracy was not satisfactory. The time needed to prepare the object (n = 31, 19.6%) and the additional costs (n = 30, 19.0%) were also seen as important limitations for routine use of 3D printing.

CONCLUSION

The additional cost and the time needed to produce devices by current 3D technology still limit its widespread use in hospitals. The development of guidelines to improve the reporting of experience with 3D printing in surgery is highly desirable.

Reconstruction of cranial defects with individually formed cranial prostheses made of polypropylene polyester knitwear: an analysis of 48 consecutive patients

This article presents a new method of cranioplasty in which polypropylene polyester knitwear was used as the filling material. The basis for prosthesis shaping was a three-dimensional model of the defect made according to the patient's CT scans. Previously, such material has never been a subject of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) individual forming. The process of the prosthesis design included CT bone scans and mold preparation for each patient. Such prostheses were implanted in 48 patients with cranial defects. The total number of prostheses applied was 51. The follow-up time was at least 6 months up to 36 months. The group of treated patients is described here, and sample pictures are shown to illustrate the results. The smallest defect had a size of 15 cm(2); the biggest, 178 cm(2). The coverage and the aesthetic results were very good in all cases. Two patients had postoperative complications. The cranioplastic solution described here is a valuable addition to the existing reconstructive methods, because of the low cost of the implant, the ease of its adjustment to the shape of the defect, and the short time of preparation.