1
|
Desideri I, Morelli I, Banini M, Greto D, Visani L, Nozzoli F, Caini S, Della Puppa A, Livi L, Perini Z, Zivelonghi E, Bulgarelli G, Pinzi V, Navarria P, Clerici E, Scorsetti M, Ascolese AM, Osti MF, Anselmo P, Amelio D, Minniti G, Scartoni D. Re-irradiation for recurrent intracranial meningiomas: Analysis of clinical outcomes and prognostic factors. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110271. [PMID: 38588920 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Re-irradiation (re-RT) for recurrent intracranial meningiomas is hindered by the limited radiation tolerance of surrounding tissue and the risk of side effects. This study aimed at assessing outcomes, toxicities and prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with recurrent meningiomas re-treated with different RT modalities. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multi-institutional database from 8 Italian centers including intracranial recurrent meningioma (RM) patients who underwent re-RT with different modalities (SRS, SRT, PT, EBRT) was collected. Biologically Equivalent Dose in 2 Gy-fractions (EQD2) and Biological Effective Dose (BED) for normal tissue and tumor were estimated for each RT course (α/β = 2 for brain tissue and α/β = 4 for meningioma). Primary outcome was second progression-free survival (s-PFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and treatment-related toxicity. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for analysis. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2021 181 patients (pts) were included. Median age at re-irradiation was 62 (range 20-89) and median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 90 (range 60-100). 78 pts were identified with WHO grade 1 disease, 65 pts had grade 2 disease and 10 pts had grade 3 disease. 28 pts who had no histologic sampling were grouped with grade 1 patients for further analysis. Seventy-five (41.4 %) patients received SRS, 63 (34.8 %) patients SRT, 31 (17.1 %) PT and 12 (6.7 %) EBRT. With a median follow-up of 4.6 years (interquartile range 1.7-6.8), 3-year s-PFS was 51.6 % and 3-year OS 72.5 %. At univariate analysis, SRT (HR 0.32, 95 % CI 0.19-0.55, p < 0.001), longer interval between the two courses of irradiation (HR 0.37, 95 % CI 0.21-0.67, p = 0.001), and higher tumor BED (HR 0.45 95 % CI 0.27-0.76, p = 0.003) were associated with longer s-PFS; in contrast, Ki67 > 5 % (HR 2.81, 95 % CI 1.48-5.34, p = 0.002) and WHO grade > 2 (HR 3.08, 95 % CI 1.80-5.28, p < 0.001) were negatively correlated with s-PFS. At multivariate analysis, SRT, time to re-RT and tumor BED maintained their statistically significant prognostic impact on s-PFS (HR 0.36, 95 % CI 0.21-0.64, p < 0.001; HR 0.38, 95 % CI 0.20-0.72, p = 0.003 and HR 0.31 95 % CI 0.13-0.76, p = 0.01, respectively). Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were reported in 38 (20.9 %) and 29 (16 %) patients. Larger tumor GTV (≥10 cc) was significantly associated with acute and late toxicity (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients with recurrent meningiomas, reirradiation is a feasible treatment option associated with acceptable toxicity profile. Prognostic factors in the decision-making process have been identified and should be incorporated in daily practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isacco Desideri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Ilaria Morelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Marco Banini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Greto
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Visani
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Filippo Nozzoli
- Histopathology and Molecular Diagnostics, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Saverio Caini
- Cancer Risk Factors and Lifestyle Epidemiology Unit, Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - Alessandro Della Puppa
- Neurosurgical Clinical Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical sciences "Mario Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Zeno Perini
- CyberKnife Unit, Ospedale S. Bortolo, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Emanuele Zivelonghi
- Unit of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; Physic Department, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy
| | - Giorgia Bulgarelli
- Unit of Stereotactic Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy; Physic Department, Department of Neurosciences, Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy
| | - Valentina Pinzi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico "Carlo Besta", Milan, Italy
| | - Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Ascolese
- Radiotherapy Department, St. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Mattia Falchetto Osti
- Radiotherapy Department, St. Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Anselmo
- Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
| | - Dante Amelio
- Proton Therapy Center, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Center, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wei Z, Jose SG, Agarwal P, Worrell S, Kulich S, Donohue JK, Deng H, Hadjipanayis CG, Niranjan A, Lunsford LD. Adjuvant Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Clear Cell Meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2024; 184:e784-e793. [PMID: 38360207 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.02.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Clear cell meningiomas (CCM) are an uncommon meningioma subtype marked by aggressive growth and high rates of recurrence despite initial resection. The present study evaluates the adjuvant benefit of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for residual or recurrent tumors. METHODS After review of our prospectively maintained database, we identified 6 patients (3 female) with histologically confirmed Grade 2 CCMs. The median age of the patients at the time of SRS was 45 years. Five patients had undergone prior gross total surgical resection and 1 patient had subtotal resection before SRS. The median SRS treatment volume was 4.7 cc and the median radiosurgical margin dose was 13 Gy (range: 10-15 Gy). RESULTS The median follow-up time was 35.5 months (range 6-168 months). Three patients achieved tumor control after the first SRS procedure. Three patients experienced tumor progression at 4, 22, and 32 months after initial SRS. Tumor control was obtained in 2 of these patients after additional SRS. One patient with multiple SRS procedures had suspected adverse radiation effect that was successfully treated with corticosteroids followed by bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS Tumor control was maintained in 5 of 6 patients after one or more SRS procedures. SRS should be considered for early intervention after surgical resection of CCM. To maximize the tumor control rate, patients with diagnosed CCM should be treated more generously and higher margin dose should be prescribed. Patients with CCM should be counselled that more than one SRS may be necessary to provide sustained tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhishuo Wei
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shalini G Jose
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Prateek Agarwal
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Stephen Worrell
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scott Kulich
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jack K Donohue
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Hansen Deng
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Costas G Hadjipanayis
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ajay Niranjan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manning P, Srinivas S, Bolar DS, Rajaratnam MK, Piccioni DE, McDonald CR, Hattangadi-Gluth JA, Farid N. Arterial spin labeled perfusion MRI for the assessment of radiation-treated meningiomas. FRONTIERS IN RADIOLOGY 2024; 4:1345465. [PMID: 38562528 PMCID: PMC10982483 DOI: 10.3389/fradi.2024.1345465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Purpose Conventional contrast-enhanced MRI is currently the primary imaging technique used to evaluate radiation treatment response in meningiomas. However, newer perfusion-weighted MRI techniques, such as 3D pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling (3D pCASL) MRI, capture physiologic information beyond the structural information provided by conventional MRI and may provide additional complementary treatment response information. The purpose of this study is to assess 3D pCASL for the evaluation of radiation-treated meningiomas. Methods Twenty patients with meningioma treated with surgical resection followed by radiation, or by radiation alone, were included in this retrospective single-institution study. Patients were evaluated with 3D pCASL and conventional contrast-enhanced MRI before and after radiation (median follow up 6.5 months). Maximum pre- and post-radiation ASL normalized cerebral blood flow (ASL-nCBF) was measured within each meningioma and radiation-treated meningioma (or residual resected and radiated meningioma), and the contrast-enhancing area was measured for each meningioma. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare pre- and post-radiation ASL-nCBF and pre- and post-radiation area. Results All treated meningiomas demonstrated decreased ASL-nCBF following radiation (p < 0.001). Meningioma contrast-enhancing area also decreased after radiation (p = 0.008) but only for approximately half of the meningiomas (9), while half (10) remained stable. A larger effect size (Wilcoxon signed-rank effect size) was seen for ASL-nCBF measurements (r = 0.877) compared to contrast-enhanced area measurements (r = 0.597). Conclusions ASL perfusion may provide complementary treatment response information in radiation-treated meningiomas. This complementary information could aid clinical decision-making and provide an additional endpoint for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Manning
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Shanmukha Srinivas
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Divya S. Bolar
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Center for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Matthew K. Rajaratnam
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - David E. Piccioni
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Carrie R. McDonald
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Jona A. Hattangadi-Gluth
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Nikdokht Farid
- Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- Center for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
De Pietro R, Zaccaro L, Marampon F, Tini P, De Felice F, Minniti G. The evolving role of reirradiation in the management of recurrent brain tumors. J Neurooncol 2023; 164:271-286. [PMID: 37624529 PMCID: PMC10522742 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04407-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite aggressive management consisting of surgery, radiation therapy (RT), and systemic therapy given alone or in combination, a significant proportion of patients with brain tumors will experience tumor recurrence. For these patients, no standard of care exists and management of either primary or metastatic recurrent tumors remains challenging.Advances in imaging and RT technology have enabled more precise tumor localization and dose delivery, leading to a reduction in the volume of health brain tissue exposed to high radiation doses. Radiation techniques have evolved from three-dimensional (3-D) conformal RT to the development of sophisticated techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), volumetric arc therapy (VMAT), and stereotactic techniques, either stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT). Several studies have suggested that a second course of RT is a feasible treatment option in patients with a recurrent tumor; however, survival benefit and treatment related toxicity of reirradiation, given alone or in combination with other focal or systemic therapies, remain a controversial issue.We provide a critical overview of the current clinical status and technical challenges of reirradiation in patients with both recurrent primary brain tumors, such as gliomas, ependymomas, medulloblastomas, and meningiomas, and brain metastases. Relevant clinical questions such as the appropriate radiation technique and patient selection, the optimal radiation dose and fractionation, tolerance of the brain to a second course of RT, and the risk of adverse radiation effects have been critically discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raffaella De Pietro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Lucy Zaccaro
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Marampon
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Tini
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, Sapienza University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy.
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Isernia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scartoni D, Giacomelli I, Pertile R, Vennarini S, Feraco P, Picori L, Annicchiarico L, Sarubbo S, Amelio D. Proton therapy re-irradiation provides promising clinical results in recurrent brain meningioma. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1096-1101. [PMID: 37526998 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2241994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Scartoni
- Proton Therapy Center, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Irene Giacomelli
- Proton Therapy Center, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Riccardo Pertile
- Department of Clinical and Evaluative Epidemiology, Health Service of Trento (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Sabina Vennarini
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Feraco
- Neuroradiology Unit, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Lorena Picori
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Luciano Annicchiarico
- Department of Neurosurgery, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Silvio Sarubbo
- Department of Neurosurgery, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| | - Dante Amelio
- Proton Therapy Center, 'S. Chiara' Hospital, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari, Trento, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Caccese M, Busato F, Guerriero A, Padovan M, Cerretti G, Gardiman MP, Zagonel V, Lombardi G. The role of radiation therapy and systemic treatments in meningioma: The present and the future. Cancer Med 2023; 12:16041-16053. [PMID: 37366279 PMCID: PMC10469847 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Meningiomas are the most prevalent tumors of the central nervous system. Their standard treatment is surgery, which can be curative. Adjuvant radiotherapy treatment is reserved for newly diagnosed cases of grade II and grade III meningiomas in cases of recurrent disease or when surgery is not radical or feasible. However, around 20% of these patients cannot undergo further surgical and/or radiotherapy treatment. Systemic oncological therapy can find its place in this setting. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been tested (gefitinib, erlotinib, sunitinib) with unsatisfactory or negative results. Bevacizumab has shown encouraging results in these settings of patients. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has reported interesting results with modest objective response rates. Several ongoing studies are assessing different target therapies and multimodal therapies; the results are to be disclosed. Not only a better understanding of the molecular characteristics in meningiomas has allowed the gathering of more information regarding pathogenesis and prognosis, but in addition, the availability of new target therapy, immunotherapy, and biological drugs has widened the scope of potentially effective treatments in this patient population. The aim of this review was to explore the radiotherapy and systemic treatments of meningioma with an analysis of ongoing trials and future therapeutic perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Caccese
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit 1Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV‐IRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Fabio Busato
- Department of Radiation OncologyAbano Terme HospitalPaduaItaly
| | - Angela Guerriero
- General Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine‐DMEDUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
| | - Marta Padovan
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit 1Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV‐IRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Giulia Cerretti
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit 1Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV‐IRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Marina Paola Gardiman
- General Pathology and Cytopathology Unit, Department of Medicine‐DMEDUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
| | - Vittorina Zagonel
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit 1Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV‐IRCCSPaduaItaly
| | - Giuseppe Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, Oncology Unit 1Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV‐IRCCSPaduaItaly
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pontoriero A, Critelli P, Conti A, Cardali S, Angileri FF, Germanò A, Lillo S, Carretta A, Brogna A, Santacaterina A, Parisi S, Pergolizzi S. The "Combo" radiotherapy treatment for high-risk grade 2 meningiomas: dose escalation and initial safety and efficacy analysis. J Neurooncol 2023; 161:203-214. [PMID: 35927392 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-022-04107-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The subgroup "high-risk" WHO grade 2 (hRG2) meningiomas may benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), but results are still suboptimal with high rates of local progression. A dose escalation using high-conformal RT techniques needs to be evaluated in terms of efficacy and safety. We report the results of a dose-escalation study, named "Combo-RT", combining Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) or Volumetric Arc Therapy (VMAT) with Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy (hSRT) boost. PATIENTS AND METHODS From November 2015 to January 2019, we prospectively enrolled 16 patients with hRG2. Seven patients had subtotal resection (STR) and 9 patients had a recurrent tumor. All patients received Combo-RT: LINAC-IMRT/ VMAT on the surgical bed and CyberKnife-hSRT boost on residual/recurrent meningioma Toxicity and initial efficacy were evaluated. RESULTS The median age was 62 years (range, 31-80 years). The median cumulative dose delivered was 46 Gy For IMRT or VMAT and 15 Gy in 3 fractions at a median isodose line of 77% for hSRT. The median cumulative BED and EQD2 were 108.75 Gy and 72.5 Gy respectively. 3-year-PFS was 75% for the whole cohort,100% for patients with STR, and 55.5% for recurrent patients. Negligible toxicities, and stable or improved symptoms during long-term follow-up were observed. Salvage treatment for recurrence was an independent predictor of treatment failure (P = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS With the limitation of a small series of patients, our results suggest that a dose escalation for hRG2 meningiomas, using a Combo-RT approach, is safe and particularly effective in the subgroup of patients with STR. Further studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Pontoriero
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Paola Critelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche E Neuromotorie (DIBINEM), Alma MaterStudiorum University of Bologna, IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Salvatore Cardali
- Neurosurgery Unit - A.O. "Papardo", Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Filippo Flavio Angileri
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Antonino Germanò
- Neurosurgery Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Sara Lillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Alessandro Carretta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche E Neuromotorie (DIBINEM), Alma MaterStudiorum University of Bologna, IRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Anna Brogna
- Medical Physics Unit - A.O.U. "G. Martino", Radiotherapy Unit - Messina, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Anna Santacaterina
- Radiation Oncology Unit - A.O. "Papardo", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Silvana Parisi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Stefano Pergolizzi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Janah R, Rujito L, Wahyono DJ. Correspondence of Meningioma Orbital Grading and Clinicopathological Features among Indonesian Patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2022. [DOI: 10.3889/oamjms.2022.10674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Orbital meningiomas can cause visual disturbances, protrusion of the eyes, double vision, and optic nerve abnormalities that significantly decrease vision and eventually lead to blindness. To the best of our knowledge, data on the incidence and pathogenesis of orbital meningioma in Indonesia are non-existent.
AIM: This study aimed to analyze the clinicopathological relationship with orbital meningioma grading.
METHODS: It is a cross-sectional observational analysis on 44 orbital meningioma patients in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital and the National Eye Center, Cicendo Eye Hospital in 2017–2020. Chi-square analysis and logistic regression with statistical significance (p < 0.05) were engaged in the method.
RESULTS: Orbital meningioma mostly occurred in women aged 30–44 years. Meningioma Grade I was dominated by meningothelial meningioma found in 14 (31.8%) patients, Grade II was atypical meningioma in 9 (20.9%) patients, and Grade III was anaplastic meningioma in 3 patients (6.8%). Clinical symptoms in the form of papillary atrophy (p = 0.046), visual acuity (p = 0.026), proptosis (p = 0.029), and hyperostosis (p = 0.024) were statistically significant and there was a significant difference between Grade I, Grade II, and Grade III using the Chi-square test. Logistic regression results showed that hyperostosis is significantly related to grading the orbital meningioma (p = 0.044) with an odds ratio of 0.206 (IK95% 0.04–0.955).
CONCLUSION: Hyperostosis increases the grading of the orbital meningioma because it is related to the invasion of the tumor into the orbital bone and is a neoplastic process. The presence of hyperostosis which is more common in Grade III meningiomas can be used as one of the most important predictors of meningioma recurrence postoperatively. Nonetheless, our data add to the existing literature the potential points of anti-invasive adjuvant therapy attacks.
Collapse
|
9
|
Maksoud Z, Schmidt MA, Huang Y, Rutzner S, Mansoorian S, Weissmann T, Bert C, Distel L, Semrau S, Lettmaier S, Eyüpoglu I, Fietkau R, Putz F. Transient Enlargement in Meningiomas Treated with Stereotactic Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061547. [PMID: 35326697 PMCID: PMC8946188 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Accurate assessment of treatment efficacy is a prerequisite for the improvement in therapeutic outcomes in clinical trials. However, it is very challenging to accurately track the size of meningiomas after radiotherapy, because of their complex shapes and often slow growth. Measuring the whole tumor volume as opposed to simple diameter measurements to assess treatment efficacy, therefore, is very promising but little is known on expected volumetric changes of meningiomas following radiotherapy. Therefore, in this study, we meticulously investigated volumetric changes in meningiomas following radiotherapy incorporating volumetric measurements from 468 MRI studies and evaluated newly proposed RANO volumetric criteria in the context of radiotherapy. We found that temporary tumor enlargement after radiotherapy overall was rare but occurred significantly more frequently after high than after low single doses of radiation, represented an important differential diagnosis to tumor progression and would have skewed results in a clinical trial if not accounted for. Abstract To investigate the occurrence of pseudoprogression/transient enlargement in meningiomas after stereotactic radiotherapy (RT) and to evaluate recently proposed volumetric RANO meningioma criteria for response assessment in the context of RT. Sixty-nine meningiomas (benign: 90%, atypical: 10%) received stereotactic RT from January 2005–May 2018. A total of 468 MRI studies were segmented longitudinally during a median follow-up of 42.3 months. Best response and local control were evaluated according to recently proposed volumetric RANO criteria. Transient enlargement was defined as volumetric increase ≥20% followed by a subsequent regression ≥20%. The mean best volumetric response was −23% change from baseline (range, −86% to +19%). According to RANO, the best volumetric response was SD in 81% (56/69), MR in 13% (9/69) and PR in 6% (4/69). Transient enlargement occurred in only 6% (4/69) post RT but would have represented 60% (3/5) of cases with progressive disease if not accounted for. Transient enlargement was characterized by a mean maximum volumetric increase of +181% (range, +24% to +389 %) with all cases occurring in the first year post-RT (range, 4.1–10.3 months). Transient enlargement was significantly more frequent with SRS or hypofractionation than with conventional fractionation (25% vs. 2%, p = 0.015). Five-year volumetric control was 97.8% if transient enlargement was recognized but 92.9% if not accounted for. Transient enlargement/pseudoprogression in the first year following SRS and hypofractionated RT represents an important differential diagnosis, especially because of the high volumetric control achieved with stereotactic RT. Meningioma enlargement during subsequent post-RT follow-up and after conventional fractionation should raise suspicion for tumor progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ziad Maksoud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Manuel Alexander Schmidt
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
- Department of Neuroradiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Yixing Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Sandra Rutzner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Sina Mansoorian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Thomas Weissmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Luitpold Distel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Sabine Semrau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Sebastian Lettmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Ilker Eyüpoglu
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
- Department of Neurosurgery, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Rainer Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
| | - Florian Putz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (Z.M.); (Y.H.); (S.R.); (S.M.); (T.W.); (C.B.); (L.D.); (S.S.); (S.L.); (R.F.)
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN (CCC ER-EMN), 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (M.A.S.); (I.E.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-9131-853-4080
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Induced Higher-Grade Transformation of a Benign Meningioma into Atypical Meningioma. Case Rep Surg 2022; 2022:4478561. [PMID: 35251732 PMCID: PMC8890901 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4478561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2021] [Revised: 10/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely used treatment modality for the management of meningioma. Whether used as a primary, adjuvant, or salvage procedure, SRS is a safe, less invasive, and effective modality of treatment as microsurgery. The transformation of a meningioma following radiosurgery raises a concern, and our current understanding about it is extremely limited. Only a few case reports have described meningioma dedifferentiation after SRS to a higher grade. Moreover, a relatively small number of cases have been reported in large retrospective studies with little elaboration. Case Description. We report a detailed case description of a 41-year-old man with progressive meningioma enlargement and rapid grade progression after SRS, which was histopathologically confirmed before and after SRS. We discussed the clinical presentation, radiological/histopathological features, and outcome. We also reviewed previous studies that reported the outcome and follow-up of patients diagnosed with grade I meningioma histopathologically or presumed with benign meningioma by radiological features who underwent primary or adjuvant radiosurgery. Conclusion The risk of progression after SRS is low, and the risk of higher-grade transformation after SRS is trivial. The early timing for recurrence and field-related radiation may favor a relationship between SRS and higher-grade transformation (causality) although transformation as a part of the natural history of the disease cannot be fully excluded. Tumor progression (treatment failure) after SRS may demonstrate a transformation, and careful, close, and long follow-up is highly recommended. Also, acknowledging that there is a low risk of early and delayed complications and a trivial risk of transformation should not preclude its use as SRS affords a high level of safety and efficiency.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ganz JC. Meningiomas. PROGRESS IN BRAIN RESEARCH 2022; 268:163-190. [PMID: 35074079 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2021.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Meningiomas arise in various locations. Convexity tumors are relatively simple to remove. Skull base tumors and tumors adjacent to the major cerebral veins and venous sinuses can be very difficult to extirpate. Attempts at radical resection can lead to serious morbidity. The combination of bulk reduction using microsurgery followed by GKNS gives greatly improved survival and very low morbidity. With smaller tumors, GKNS may be used as the primary treatment. Increasing numbers of asymptomatic meningiomas are demonstrated either as an unexpected finding or as a residual or recurrent tumor after surgery. In all of these situations, GKNS gives a better result than observation or reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy C Ganz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Takai S, Wanibuchi M, Kawabata S, Takeuchi K, Sakurai Y, Suzuki M, Ono K, Miyatake SI. Reactor-based boron neutron capture therapy for 44 cases of recurrent and refractory high-grade meningiomas with long-term follow-up. Neuro Oncol 2021; 24:90-98. [PMID: 33984146 PMCID: PMC8730746 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-grade meningioma (HGM) is difficult to treat, and recurrent HGM after radiotherapy has an especially poor prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 44 consecutive patients with recurrent and refractory HGM who were treated by reactor-based boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). METHODS In 2005-2019, we treated 44 recurrent and refractory HGMs by reactor-based BNCT. We analyzed the patients' tumor shrinkage, overall survival (OS) after initial diagnosis, OS after BNCT, progression-free survival (PFS) post-BNCT, and treatment failure patterns. RESULTS The median OS (mOS) after BNCT and mOS after initial diagnosis were 29.6 (95%CI: 16.1-40.4) and 98.4 (95%CI: 68.7-169.4) months, respectively. The median follow-up after BNCT was 26 (6.4-103) months. The grade 2 (20 cases) and 3 (24 cases) post-BNCT mOS values were 44.4 (95%CI: 27.4-not determined) and 21.55 (10.6-30.6) months, respectively (p=0.0009). Follow-up images were obtained from 36 cases at >3 months post-BNCT; 35 showed tumor shrinkage during the observation period. The post-BNCT median PFS (mPFS) of 36 cases was 13.7 (95%CI: 8.3-28.6) months. The post-BNCT mPFS values in patients with grade 2 and 3 disease were 24.3 (95%CI: 9.8-not determined) and 9.4 (6.3-14.4) months, respectively (p=0.0024). Local recurrence was observed in only 22.2% of cases. These results showed good local tumor control and prolonged survival for recurrent HGM cases. CONCLUSIONS Most of these cases had relatively large tumor volumes. The proportion of grade 3 patients was extremely high. Our patients thus seemed to have poor prognoses. Nevertheless, reactor-based BNCT exerted relatively good local control and favorable survival for recurrent and refractory HGMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Takai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masahiko Wanibuchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.,Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinji Kawabata
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Takeuchi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Sakurai
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University, Kumatori, Osaka, Japan
| | - Minoru Suzuki
- Radiation Oncology Research Laboratory, Institute for Integrated Radiation and Nuclear Science, Kyoto University, Kumatori, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Ono
- Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shin-Ichi Miyatake
- Department of Neurosurgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan.,Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Horbinski C, Xi G, Wang Y, Hashizume R, Gopalakrishnan M, Phillips JJ, Houghton P, James CD, Kalapurakal JA. The effects of palbociclib in combination with radiation in preclinical models of aggressive meningioma. Neurooncol Adv 2021; 3:vdab085. [PMID: 34345820 PMCID: PMC8325754 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdab085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Meningiomas are the most common tumor arising within the cranium of adults. Despite surgical resection and radiotherapy, many meningiomas invade the brain, and many recur, often repeatedly. To date, no chemotherapy has proven effective against such tumors. Thus, there is an urgent need for chemotherapeutic options for treating meningiomas, especially those that enhance radiotherapy. Palbociclib is an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 that has been shown to enhance radiotherapy in preclinical models of other cancers, is well-tolerated in patients, and is used to treat malignancies elsewhere in the body. We, therefore, sought to determine its therapeutic potential in preclinical models of meningioma. METHODS Patient-derived meningioma cells were tested in vitro and in vivo with combinations of palbociclib and radiation. Outputs included cell viability, apoptosis, clonogenicity, engrafted mouse survival, and analysis of engrafted tumor tissues after therapy. RESULTS We found that palbociclib was highly potent against p16-deficient, Rb-intact CH157 and IOMM-Lee meningioma cells in vitro, but was ineffective against p16-intact, Rb-deficient SF8295 meningioma cells. Palbociclib also enhanced the in vitro efficacy of radiotherapy when used against p16-deficient meningioma, as indicated by cell viability and clonogenic assays. In vivo, the combination of palbociclib and radiation extended the survival of mice bearing orthotopic p16 deficient meningioma xenografts, relative to each as a monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS These data suggest that palbociclib could be repurposed to treat patients with p16-deficient, Rb-intact meningiomas, and that a clinical trial in combination with radiation therapy merits consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Craig Horbinski
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Department of Pathology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Guifa Xi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Yufen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rintaro Hashizume
- Department of Pediatrics, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Mahesh Gopalakrishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Joanna J Phillips
- Departments of Neurological Surgery and Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter Houghton
- Greehey Children’s Cancer Research Institute, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Charles D James
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - John A Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yolcu YU, Goyal A, Alvi MA, Moinuddin FM, Bydon M. Trends in the utilization of radiotherapy for spinal meningiomas: insights from the 2004-2015 National Cancer Database. Neurosurg Focus 2020; 46:E6. [PMID: 31153154 DOI: 10.3171/2019.3.focus1969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVERecent studies have reported on the utility of radiosurgery for local control and symptom relief in spinal meningioma. The authors sought to evaluate national utilization trends in radiotherapy (including radiosurgery), investigate possible factors associated with its use in patients with spinal meningioma, and its impact on survival for atypical tumors.METHODSUsing the ICD-O-3 topographical codes C70.1, C72.0, and C72.1 and histological codes 9530-9535 and 9537-9539, the authors queried the National Cancer Database for patients in whom spinal meningioma had been diagnosed between 2004 and 2015. Patients who had undergone radiation in addition to surgery and those who had received radiation as the only treatment were analyzed for factors associated with each treatment.RESULTSFrom among 10,458 patients with spinal meningioma in the database, the authors found a total of 268 patients who had received any type of radiation. The patients were divided into two main groups for the analysis of radiation alone (137 [51.1%]) and radiation plus surgery (131 [48.9%]). An age > 69 years (p < 0.001), male sex (p = 0.03), and tumor size 5 to < 6 cm (p < 0.001) were found to be associated with significantly higher odds of receiving radiation alone, whereas a Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 (p = 0.01) was associated with significantly lower odds of receiving radiation alone. Moreover, a larger tumor size (2 to < 3 cm, p = 0.01; 3 to < 4 cm, p < 0.001; 4 to < 5 cm, p < 0.001; 5 to < 6 cm, p < 0.001; and ≥ 6 cm, p < 0.001; reference = 1 to < 2 cm), as well as borderline (p < 0.001) and malignant (p < 0.001) tumors were found to be associated with increased odds of undergoing radiation in addition to surgery. Receiving adjuvant radiation conferred a significant reduction in overall mortality among patients with borderline or malignant spinal meningiomas (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.02-4.1, p = 0.02).CONCLUSIONSThe current analysis of cases from a national cancer database revealed a small increase in the use of radiation for the management of spinal meningioma without a significant increase in overall survival. Larger tumor size and borderline or malignant behavior were found to be associated with increased radiation use. Data in the present analysis failed to show an overall survival benefit in utilizing adjuvant radiation for atypical tumors.
Collapse
|
15
|
Minniti G, Paolini S, Rea MLJ, Isidori A, Scaringi C, Russo I, Osti MF, Cavallo L, Esposito V. Stereotactic reirradiation with temozolomide in patients with recurrent aggressive pituitary tumors and pituitary carcinomas. J Neurooncol 2020; 149:123-130. [PMID: 32632895 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03579-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the efficacy of a second course of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (re-SRT) and temozolomide (TMZ) as salvage treatment option in patients with aggressive pituitary tumors (APTs) and pituitary carcinomas (PCs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients with recurrent or progressive APTs (n = 17) and PCs (n = 4) who received combined TMZ and re-SRT, 36 Gy/18fractions or 37.5 Gy/15fractions, were retrospectively evaluated. TMZ was given at a dose of 75 mg/m2 given concurrently to re-SRT, and then 150-200 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks or 50 mg/m2 daily for 12 months. Local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of re-SRT by Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 27 months (range 12-58 months), 2-year and 4-year LC rates were 73% and 65%, respectively; 2-year and 4-year survival rates were 82% and 66%, respectively. A complete response was achieved in 2 and partial response in 11 patients. Six patients recurred with a median time to progression of 14 months. O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status and tumor volume emerged as prognostic factors. Grade 3 radiation-related toxicities occurred in 3 (14%) patients. Grade 2 or 3 hematologic toxicities during chemotherapy occurred in 8 (38%) patients. CONCLUSION Re-SRT and TMZ is a safe treatment offering high LC in patients with progressive APTs and PCs. The potential advantages of combined chemoradiation as up-front or salvage treatment need to be explored in prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Minniti
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, Policlinico Le Scotte, 53100, Siena, Italy. .,IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
| | | | - Marie Lise Jaffrain Rea
- Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences Department, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Andrea Isidori
- Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Claudia Scaringi
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, San Pietro Hospital FBF, Rome, Italy
| | - Ivana Russo
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Villa Maria, Mirabella, AV, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Cavallo
- Division of Neurosurgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Huang RY, Bi WL, Weller M, Kaley T, Blakeley J, Dunn I, Galanis E, Preusser M, McDermott M, Rogers L, Raizer J, Schiff D, Soffietti R, Tonn JC, Vogelbaum M, Weber D, Reardon DA, Wen PY. Proposed response assessment and endpoints for meningioma clinical trials: report from the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Working Group. Neuro Oncol 2020; 21:26-36. [PMID: 30137421 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
No standard criteria exist for assessing response and progression in clinical trials involving patients with meningioma, and there is no consensus on the optimal endpoints for trials currently under way. As a result, there is substantial variation in the design and response criteria of meningioma trials, making comparison between trials difficult. In addition, future trials should be designed with accepted standardized endpoints. The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology Meningioma Working Group is an international effort to develop standardized radiologic criteria for treatment response for meningioma clinical trials. In this proposal, we present the recommendations for response criteria and endpoints for clinical trials involving patients with meningiomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Kaley
- Neuro-Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Ian Dunn
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Evanthia Galanis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Clinical Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Medical University Vienna-General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Michael McDermott
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Leland Rogers
- Radiation Oncology, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jeffrey Raizer
- Medical Neuro-Oncology, Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - David Schiff
- Departments of Neurology, Neurological Surgery, and Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University of Turin and City of Health and Science University Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | | | - Michael Vogelbaum
- Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - David A Reardon
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center of Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Maiuri F, Mariniello G, Peca C, Guadagno E, Corvino S, d'Avanzo S, Del Basso De Caro M, de Divitiis O. Multicentric and diffuse recurrences of meningiomas. Br J Neurosurg 2020; 34:439-446. [PMID: 32312105 DOI: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1754335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Meningiomas recur with a rate of 10-32% at 10 years. Several features influence the risk of recurrence.Objective: To define the pathological and surgical features at risk of multicentric-diffuse versus local-peripheral recurrence.Methods: Thirty-three patients operated on for intracranial meningiomas who experienced multicentric-diffuse recurrence were retrospectively analyzed. The data of these patients were compared to those of 50 patients who experienced local-peripheral recurrence. The analyzed factors included age and sex, tumor location and shape, brain-tumor interface, entity of resection, WHO grade, Ki67 MIB1, progesterone receptor (PR) expression, number of reoperations, progression of WHO grade, and outcome.Results: Meningiomas which recurred in multicentric-diffuse pattern showed at initial surgery a significantly higher rate of flat-shaped tumors (p = .0008) and of cases with Ki67 Li ≥ 4% (p = .037) than those which recurred in localized-peripheral pattern, whereas other factors did not significantly differ. Among patients with multicentric-diffuse recurrences, 25 underwent one to three reoperations; 17 among them (66%) are alive with local tumor control or slow progression 2-25 years after the initial surgery versus only 2 out of 8 who did not undergo surgery.Conclusions: Flat-shaped meningiomas and those with Ki67 Li ≥ 4% are at higher risk of multicentric-diffuse recurrence. Multiple reoperations over a period of several years may obtain rather long survivals in selected patients with prevalent intradural, not anaplastic tumors and not too extensive dural infiltration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Maiuri
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Neurosurgical Clinic, Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mariniello
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Neurosurgical Clinic, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmela Peca
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Neurosurgical Clinic, Naples, Italy
| | - Elia Guadagno
- Department of Advanced Biomorphological Sciences, "Federico II" University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Sergio Corvino
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Neurosurgical Clinic, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefania d'Avanzo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Neurosurgical Clinic, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Oreste de Divitiis
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Neurosurgical Clinic, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gamma Knife radiosurgery: Scenarios and support for re-irradiation. Phys Med 2019; 68:75-82. [PMID: 31760329 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves the focal delivery of large, cytotoxic doses of radiation to small targets within the brain, often located in close proximity to radiosensitive normal tissue structures and requiring very low procedural uncertainties to perform safely. Historically, neurosurgeons considered SRS as a one-time, single session procedure. However therapeutic advances and a better understanding of the clinical response to SRS have caused a renewal of interest in a variety of re-irradiation scenarios; including re-irradiation of the same target after prior SRS, SRS treatments after prior broad-field radiation, hypofractionated treatments, and volume-staged treatments. Re-irradiation may in some cases require even greater effort towards minimizing treatment uncertainties as compared to one-time-only treatments. Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has evolved over time in ways that directly supports many re-irradiation scenarios while helping to minimize overall procedural uncertainty.
Collapse
|
19
|
Mooney MA, Bi WL, Cantalino JM, Wu KC, Harris TC, Possatti LL, Juvekar P, Hsu L, Dunn IF, Al-Mefty O, Devlin PM. Brachytherapy with surgical resection as salvage treatment for recurrent high-grade meningiomas: a matched cohort study. J Neurooncol 2019; 146:111-120. [PMID: 31745706 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03342-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate surgical resection with brachytherapy placement as a salvage treatment in patients with recurrent high-grade meningioma who exhausted prior external beam treatment options. METHODS Single-center retrospective review of our institutional experience of brachytherapy implantation from 2012 to 2018. The primary outcome of the study was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and complications. A matched cohort of patients not treated with brachytherapy over the same time period was evaluated as a control group. All patients had received prior radiation treatment and underwent planned gross total resection (GTR) surgery. RESULTS A total of 27 cases were evaluated. Compared with prior treatment, brachytherapy implantation demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in tumor control [HR 0.316 (0.101 - 0.991), p = 0.034]. PFS-6 and PFS-12 were 92.3% and 84.6%, respectively. Compared with the matched control cohort, brachytherapy treatment demonstrated improved PFS [HR 0.310 (0.103 - 0.933), p = 0.030]. Overall survival was not statistically significantly different between groups [HR 0.381 (0.073 - 1.982), p = 0.227]. Overall postoperative complications were comparable between groups, although there was a higher incidence of radiation necrosis in the brachytherapy cohort. CONCLUSION Brachytherapy with planned GTR improved PFS in recurrent high-grade meningioma patients who exhausted prior external beam radiation treatment options. Future improvement of brachytherapy dose delivery methods and techniques may continue to prolong control rates and improve outcomes for this challenging group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Mooney
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, 350 W. Thomas Rd, Phoenix, AZ, USA. .,Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Wenya Linda Bi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kyle C Wu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas C Harris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lucas L Possatti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Parikshit Juvekar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liangge Hsu
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ian F Dunn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ossama Al-Mefty
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Phillip M Devlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sharma M, Schroeder JL, Elson P, Meola A, Barnett GH, Vogelbaum MA, Suh JH, Chao ST, Mohammadi AM, Stevens GHJ, Murphy ES, Angelov L. Outcomes and prognostic stratification of patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with salvage stereotactic radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 2019; 131:489-499. [PMID: 30485180 DOI: 10.3171/2018.4.jns172909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2017] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant form of astrocytoma. The average survival is 6-10 months in patients with recurrent GBM (rGBM). In this study, the authors evaluated the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with rGBMs. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective review of their brain tumor database (1997-2016). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after salvage SRS were the primary endpoints evaluated. Response to SRS was assessed using volumetric MR images. RESULTS Fifty-three patients with rGBM underwent salvage SRS targeting 75 lesions. The median tumor diameter and volume were 2.55 cm and 3.80 cm3, respectively. The median prescription dose was 18 Gy (range 12-24 Gy) and the homogeneity index was 1.90 (range 1.11-2.02). The median OS after salvage SRS was estimated to be 11.0 months (95% CI 7.1-12.2) and the median PFS after salvage SRS was 4.4 months (95% CI 3.7-5.0). A Karnofsky Performance Scale score ≥ 80 was independently associated with longer OS, while small tumor volume (< 15 cm3) and less homogeneous treatment plans (homogeneity index > 1.75) were both independently associated with longer OS (p = 0.007 and 0.03) and PFS (p = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). Based on these factors, 2 prognostic groups were identified for PFS (5.4 vs 3.2 months), while 3 were identified for OS (median OS of 15.2 vs 10.5 vs 5.2 months). CONCLUSIONS SRS is associated with longer OS and/or PFS in patients with good performance status, small-volume tumor recurrences, and heterogeneous treatment plans. The authors propose a prognostic model to identify a cohort of rGBM patients who may benefit from SRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur Sharma
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Jason L Schroeder
- 2Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo
| | - Paul Elson
- 3Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic; and
| | - Antonio Meola
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Gene H Barnett
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - John H Suh
- 4The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel T Chao
- 4The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Glen H J Stevens
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| | - Erin S Murphy
- 4The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- 1The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Image-Guided Robotic Radiosurgery for Treatment of Recurrent Grade II and III Meningiomas. A Single-Center Study. World Neurosurg 2019; 131:e96-e107. [PMID: 31306844 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly applied for malignant meningiomas as an alternative to conventionally fractioned radiation therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of an institutional patient cohort with malignant meningiomas treated by image-guided SRS. METHODS All patients with atypical or anaplastic meningiomas who were treated by SRS using CyberKnife (CK) were identified. Local failure and regional and/or distant recurrences were evaluated together with toxicity and overall survival. RESULTS We identified 127 treated lesions (105 atypical and 22 anaplastic) in 35 patients. The mean time interval between the last surgery and subsequent CK-SRS was 30.8 ± 24.5 months. Most lesions (83.5%) were treated using single-fraction CK-SRS. The median planning target volume of all 127 lesions was 1.71 cm3 (range, 0.06-22.5 cm3). The median follow-up period was 23 months (range, 2.1-60.3 months). The estimated local control rates were 97%, 77%, and 67% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively, in atypical meningiomas and 66% each at 12 and 24 months in anaplastic meningiomas. The regional progression-free survival was 93%, 73%, and 59% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively, in atypical lesions and 93% and 46% at 12 and 24 months in anaplastic lesions. The estimated distant tumor progression-free interval in atypical lesions was 80%, 44%, and 44% at 12, 36, and 60 months, respectively, and 49% and 24% at 12 and 24 months, respectively, in anaplastic lesions. Age was identified as a risk factor for local failure. CONCLUSIONS Although the real boundaries of efficacy of SRS have to be further evaluated in a prospective trial, it seems that aggressive treatment by high-dose single or multisession SRS of recurring malignant meningiomas provides satisfactory local control rates.
Collapse
|
22
|
|
23
|
Imber BS, Neal B, Casey DL, Darwish H, Lin AL, Cahlon O, Chon B, Tsai H, Hug E, Yamada Y, Yang TJ. Clinical Outcomes of Recurrent Intracranial Meningiomas Treated with Proton Beam Reirradiation. Int J Part Ther 2019; 5:11-22. [PMID: 31773037 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-18-00045.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Recurrent meningiomas remain therapeutically challenging, often progressive despite multimodality salvage. There are limited data guiding reirradiation (reRT), and proton beam radiation therapy (PBRT) offers a potential advantage owing to lower integral brain dose. Patients and Methods We retrospectively conducted a review of 16 patients who received PBRT reRT for recurrent meningiomas. Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards were used to determine post-PBRT progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and to evaluate clinical predictors. Results At diagnosis, 7 (44%), 8 (50%), and 1 (6%) patient had World Health Organization (WHO) grade I, II and III tumors, respectively. All received prior radiation therapy (RT) to a median of 54 Gy (range 13-65.5). Median time to PBRT reRT after prior RT was 5.8 years (range 0.7-18.7). Median PBRT dose was 60 Gy(RBE) (range 30-66.6), and median planning tumor volume (PTV) was 76 cm3 (range 8-249). Median follow-up was 18.8 months. At last follow-up, 7 intracranial recurrences (44%) and 3 disease-related deaths (19%) were found. Median cohort PFS was 22.6 months, with 1- and 2-year PFS of 80% and 43%, respectively. Median OS was not achieved, with 1- and 2-year OS of 94% and 73%; all deaths were felt to be related to meningioma. Patients with initially grade I tumors had improved PFS versus higher grade (Hazard Ratio, HR = 0.23, P = .03) with 1- and 2-year PFS estimates of 100% versus 71% and 75% versus 29%, respectively. Longer interval between prior RT and PBRT also predicted improved PFS (P = .03) and OS (P = .049). Overall late grade 3+ toxicity rate was 31%. Two patients (13%) developed radionecrosis at 6 and 16 months after PBRT; only 1 was symptomatic. Conclusions This is the first series specifically analyzing PBRT alone as a reRT strategy for recurrent meningioma. We report fair intracranial control with low rates of radionecrosis at 1 year after reRT. However, strategies to achieve durable outcomes are needed, particularly for high-grade tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon S Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian Neal
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Dana L Casey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heba Darwish
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Andrew L Lin
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brian Chon
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Henry Tsai
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Eugen Hug
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, NJ, USA
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - T Jonathan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lin AJ, Hui C, Dahiya S, Lu HC, Kim AH, Campian JL, Tsien C, Zipfel GJ, Rich KM, Chicoine M, Huang J. Radiologic Response and Disease Control of Recurrent Intracranial Meningiomas Treated With Reirradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:194-203. [PMID: 29970312 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical outcomes of reirradiation of recurrent meningiomas and factors related to patient selection and treatment modality. METHODS AND MATERIALS Recurrent meningioma patients who failed prior stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) received reirradiation using either SRS or EBRT. Complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and progression after reirradiation were evaluated using the MacDonald criteria. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) after reirradiation were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with reirradiation modality and PFS, respectively. RESULTS Forty-three patients (14 grade 1/unknown, 29 grade 2/3) were reirradiated with SRS (67%) or EBRT (33%). Median time from initial SRS/EBRT to reirradiation was 60 months (range, 7.5-202); median tumor volume at the time of reirradiation was 4.8 cm3 (range, 0.14-64). After a median radiologic follow-up of 19.4 months, the response rate (CR + PR) was 8% for grade 1 and 20% for grade 2/3 meningiomas. After 2 years, LC was 78%, PFS was 63%, and OS was 80%. Larger tumor volume and prior SRS were associated with reirradiation using EBRT. Reirradiated grade 2/3 meningiomas had significantly worse PFS than grade 1 (2-year PFS: 50% vs 92%, respectively; P = .02) but not LC (P = .11) or OS (P = .39). On multivariable analysis, worse PFS was significantly associated with grade 2/3 histology (hazard ratio, 3.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.33-11.6) as well as worse Karnofsky Performance Scale score but not reirradiation dose, volume, and modality. Grades 3 to 4 radiation necrosis developed in 4 patients (10%). CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation of recurrent meningiomas appears to be feasible with promising clinical outcomes and an acceptable toxicity profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Sonika Dahiya
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Hsiang-Chih Lu
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Albert H Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jian L Campian
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Christina Tsien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Gregory J Zipfel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Keith M Rich
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Michael Chicoine
- Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jiayi Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
| |
Collapse
|