Diagnosis of malpositioned chest tubes after emergency tube thoracostomy: is computed tomography more accurate than chest radiograph?

[Chest Tube in Thoracic Trauma - Recommendations of the Interdisciplinary Thoracic Trauma Task Group of the German Society for Thoracic Surgery (DGT) and the German Trauma Society (DGU)]

For unstable patients with chest trauma, the chest tube is the method of choice for the treatment of a relevant pneumothorax or haemothorax. In the case of a tension pneumothorax, needle decompression with a cannula of at least 5 cm length should be performed, directly followed by the insertion of a chest tube. The evaluation of the patient should be performed primarily with a clinical examination, a chest X-ray and sonography, but the gold standard of diagnostic testing is computed tomography (CT).A small-bore chest tube (e.g. 14 French) should be used in stable patients, while unstable patients should receive a large-bore drain (24 French or larger). Insertion of chest drains has a high complication rate of between 5% and 25%, and incorrect positioning of the tube is the most common complication. However, incorrect positioning can usually only be reliably detected or ruled out with a CT scan, and chest X-rays proofed to be insufficient to answer this question. Therapy should be carried out with mild suction of approximately 20 cmH₂O, and clamping the chest tube before removal showed no beneficial effect. The removal of drains can be safely performed, either at the end of inspiration or at the end of expiration. In order to reduce the high complication rate, in the future the focus should be more on the education and training of medical staff members.

The relationship between chest tube position in the thoracic cavity and treatment failure in patients with pleural infection: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Pleural infection is an infection of the pleural space that is usually treated with antibiotics and source control. Chest tube insertion is the most popular and widely used drainage technique. We typically attempt to place the tube at the bottom of the thoracic cavity to consider the effects of gravity; however, the effectiveness of this practice is not well-defined. Therefore, we aimed to examine whether the position of the tip of the thoracic tube affects treatment failure in patients with pleural infection.

Methods

In this retrospective observational study, patients with pleural infection who underwent thoracic tube insertion were divided into two groups: those with the tip of the tube positioned below the 10th thoracic vertebra at the level of the diaphragm (lower position group) and those with the tip placed above the 9th thoracic vertebra (upper position group). We compared whether the position of the tube tip affected treatment failure. Stabilized inverse probability treatment weights (SIPTW) were used to balance the baseline characteristics between the groups. Treatment failure showed a composite outcome of hospital death, referral to surgeons for surgery, and additional chest tube insertion.

Results

Among the 87 patients, 41 and 46 patients were in the lower and upper groups, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the composite outcomes between the groups (46.3% vs. 54.3%, P = 0.596). There was also no significant difference in the composite outcome between both groups after adjusting for SIPTW (52.3% vs. 68.8%, P = 0.286).

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in the treatment failure in this study addressing pleural infection treatment, in which the drain tip position was stratified by the 9th and 10th thoracic vertebrae. The position of the tip of the thoracic tube may not be important for pleural infection treatment providing that it is in the thoracic cavity.

Trial registration The participants were registered retrospectively.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12890-022-02157-x.

Limitation of tube thoracostomy in treating pneumothorax in COVID-19 infected patients. A retrospective cohort study

Background

COVID¹⁹ infection is caused by the highly contagious SARS-CoV-2(Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2). The first outbreak of this infection was in Wuhan, China in December 2019. Since then, it has spread rapidly across the world, with more than 100000 new cases each day. Among those infected with SARS-COV-2 up to 20% develop severe disease requiring hospitalization. Among those who are hospitalized, one quarter will need ICU admission. Admission to the ICU is due to respiratory failure or pneumonia. The pneumonia associated with COVID¹⁹ infection may lead to respiratory failure requiring endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation. An important complication of mechanical ventilation is barotrauma. Barotrauma appears to be common in COVID¹⁹ patients. Pneumothorax developed in 25% of COVID¹⁹ patients who had barotrauma. In COVID¹⁹ the percentage of patients with mild symptoms who develop a pleural effusion is 8% compared to 28% in patients who are critically ill. Most of the COVID¹⁹ infected that have a pneumothorax or pleural effusion need a thoracostomy. In trauma cases most, thoracic injuries (leading to pneumothorax or hemothorax) are effectively treated with tube thoracostomy.

Objectives

First objective is to compare the therapeutic effect of tube thoracostomy on COVID¹⁹ infected patients who have pneumothorax or pleural effusion to those non-COVID¹⁹ infected patients who had traumatic pneumothorax or pleural effusion treated by tube thoracostomy. Second objective is to study the morbidity associated with tube thoracostomy in COVID¹⁹ infected patients who have pneumothorax or pleural effusion.

Patients and methods

This study was conducted in Sheikh Khalifa medical city Ajman, United Arab Emirates. It is a descriptive, observational, retrospective cohort study. One hundred patients were recruited from the January 1, 2020 to the December 31, 2020. Patients were divided into two groups. First group includes fifty adult COVID ¹⁹ infected patients who had no trauma. Second group includes fifty adult COVID¹⁹ infection free patients who had trauma. Inclusion criteria for the first group: COVID ¹⁹ infected patients with an age equal to or above 18 years, of both genders, with history of pneumothorax, pleural effusion or both of them, needed insertion of thoracostomy chest tube. Inclusion criteria for the second group: Patients with an age equal to or above 18 years, of both genders, with history of traumatic pneumothorax, pleural effusion (hemothorax) or both of them, needed insertion of thoracostomy chest tube. Exclusion criteria for the first group: Children, Adult COVID¹⁹ infected patients who didn't have pneumothorax or plural effusion, adult COVID¹⁹ infected patients who had pneumothorax or plural effusion without a need for tube thoracostomy. Exclusion criteria for the second group: Adult non-COVID¹⁹ infected patients who had trauma, but didn't have pneumothorax or pleural effusion, adult non-COVID¹⁹ infected patients who had traumatic pneumothorax or pleural effusion without a need for tube thoracostomy. The collected data was revised, coded, tabulated and introduced to a PC using Statistical package for Social Science (SPSS 25). Mann Whitney Test (U test) was used to assess the statistical significance of the difference of a non-parametric variable between two study groups. Chi-Square test was used to examine the relationship between two qualitative variables. Fisher's exact test was used to examine the relationship between two qualitative variables when the expected count is less than 5 in more than 20% of cells.

Results

Most of patients in trauma group (group 2) were with the age range of 20-40-year (58.8% of patients) P value was significant (<0.001). In COVID ¹⁹ infected patients' group (group 1) the age range was 40-60 year (50%of patients). P Value (<0.001) was significant too. Male was the dominant gender in group 2 (96.1% of patients were male), while in group1 (78% of patients were male), P Value was significant (0.007). No co-morbidities (diabetes, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, Asthma and dyslipidemia) were detected in group 2 (0.0%). Co-morbidity were detected in 76% of patients in group 1, P Value was significant (<0.001). Hemothorax occurred in 37.3% of patients in group 2, and no cases of hemothorax was detected in group 1. P Value was significant (<0.001). Complications of chest tube insertion took place in group 2 as follows; tube malposition in 13.7% of patients, tube blockade in 3.9% of patients. The percentage in group 1 was as follows tube malposition in 16% of patients, tube blockade in 18%. The difference between the two was not significant for tube malposition (P value 0.748) and significant for tube blockade (P value 0.023). Subcutaneous emphysema occurred in 15.7% of patients in group 2 and in 15.7% of patients in group 1. The difference was not significant (P value was 0.118). Acquired bronchopleural fistula occurred 2.0% of group 1 cases. No cases of this fistula were documented in group 2. Number of chest tubes needed to be inserted in group 2 patients was as follows (one chest tube in: 74.5% of patients, two chest tubes in: 23.5% of patients. Three chest tubes or more in 2% of patients). While in group1 patients' number of chest tubes needed to be inserted was (one in 56% of patients, two in 30% of patients. Three or more in 14% of patients). The difference was significant only in those who required insertion of three chest tubes or more (P value was 0.028). The median duration needed to keep a chest tube was 3 days in group 2, and 7 days in group 1. The difference between the two was significant (P value was 0.000). Death was the fate of 3.9% of patients in group 2 and in 64% of patients in group 1. The difference was significant (P value was< 0.001).

Conclusion

Therapeutic effect of tube thoracostomy in treating Adult COVID¹⁹ patients who had pneumothorax or pleural effusion is less than that used in treating trauma non-COVID¹⁹ patients who had pneumothorax or plural effusion. Morbidity and mortality related to tube thoracostomy applied to treat pneumothorax or pleural effusion in adult COVID¹⁹ patients is more than that in trauma non COVID ¹⁹ patients.

Scoping review of traumatic hemothorax: Evidence and knowledge gaps, from diagnosis to chest tube removal

BACKGROUND

Traumatic hemothorax is a common injury that invites diagnostic and management strategy debates. Evidence-based management has been associated with improved care efficiency. However, the literature abounds with long-debated, re-emerging, and new questions. We aimed to consolidate up-to-date evidence on traumatic hemothoraces, focusing on clinical conundra debated in literature.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of 21 clinical conundra in traumatic hemothorax diagnosis and management according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Experimental and observational studies evaluating patients (aged ≥18 years) with traumatic hemothoraces were identified through database searches (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library; database inception to Sep, 26 2020) and bibliography reviews of selected articles. Three reviewers screened and selected articles using standardized forms.

RESULTS

We screened 1,440 articles for eligibility, of which 71 met criteria for synthesis. The review comprises 6 sections: (1) Presumptive antibiotics before tube thoracostomy; (2) Initial diagnostic and intervention decisions; (3) Chest tubes; (4) Retained hemothoraces; (5) Delayed hemothoraces; and (6) Chest tube removal). The 21 conundra across these sections follow the format of a question, our recommendation based on interpretation of available evidence, and succinct rationale. Rationale sections detail knowledge gaps and opportunities for future research.

CONCLUSION

Even practices engrained into surgical dogma, such as obtaining chest x-rays after inserting or removing chest tubes and mandating operation for patients who develop chest tube output above a certain threshold, deserve re-evaluation. Some knowledge gaps require rigorous future investigation; sound clinical judgment can likely supplement others.

Optimal Initial Positioning of Chest Tubes to Prevent Retained Hemothorax Using a Novel Steerable Chest Tube With Extendable Infusion Cannula

INTRODUCTION

With blunt and penetrating trauma to the chest, warfighters and civilians frequently suffer from punctured lung (pneumothorax) and/or bleeding into the pleural space (hemothorax). Optimal management of this condition requires the rapid placement of a chest tube to evacuate as much of the blood and air as possible. Incomplete drainage of blood leading to retained hemothorax may be the result of the final tube tip position not being in contact with the blood collections. To address this problem, we sought to develop a "steerable" chest tube that could be accurately placed or repositioned into a specific desired position in the pleural space to assure optimal drainage. An integrated infusion cannula was added for the instillation of anticoagulants to maintain tube patency, thrombolytics for clot lysis, and analgesics for pain control if required.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A triple-lumen tube was designed to provide a channel for a pull-wire which was wound around an axle integrated into a small proximal handle and controlled by a ratcheted thumbwheel. Tension on the wire creates an arc on the tube that allows for positioning. In vitro testing focused on the relationship between the tension on the pull-wire and the resultant arc. Two adult cadavers and two anesthetized pigs were used to study the feasibility of accurate tube placement. After a brief training session, providers were asked to place tubes inferiorly along the diaphragm where blood was anticipated to accumulate or at the apex of the lung for pneumothorax. Success was determined with fluoroscopic images and was judged as a tube tip lying in the targeted position.

RESULTS

The design was prototyped with an extruded polyvinyl chloride multilumen tube and a 3D printed tensioning handle. In vitro studies showed that one turn of the thumbwheel created 70° to 90° of arc of the tube. Cadaver and animal studies showed consistent success in the desired placement of the tube at or near the lateral diaphragm or in the apex. Attempts were also successful by surgical residents with minimal training.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial preliminary studies on a novel steerable chest tube have demonstrated the ability to appropriately position the tube in a desired location. The addition of an extendable cannula will allow for safe clot lysis or maintained tube patency. Additional studies are planned to confirm the benefit of this device in preventing retained hemothorax.

Safety of the anterior approach versus the lateral approach for chest tube insertion by residents treating spontaneous pneumothorax: a propensity score weighted analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of chest tube malposition, the most common complication during chest tube insertion, with the anterior or lateral approach for thoracostomy performed for patients with spontaneous pneumothorax by junior and senior residents.

METHODS

We retrospectively included patients aged ≥ 20 years who exhibited primary or secondary spontaneous pneumothorax without pleural adhesion and underwent chest tube drainage performed by junior or senior residents at tertiary care hospital. The study exposure involved insertion of the chest tube in the midclavicular line (anterior approach) or the anterior or midaxillary line (lateral approach). The primary outcome was the number of chest tube malpositions. Multiple imputation was used for missing data. The inverse probability of treatment weighting method was used to adjust for baseline confounders.

RESULTS

We identified 34 and 219 patients who underwent thoracostomy using the midclavicular and lateral approaches, respectively. The number of chest tube malpositions was 4 (11.8%) in the anterior approach and 34 (15.5%) in the lateral approach. The inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis revealed that the estimated odds ratio for chest tube malposition in the anterior approach group versus the lateral approach group was 0.61 (95% confidence interval, 0.17-2.11). The duration of chest tube drainage and the number of operations for persistent air leaks were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study revealed that the risk of chest tube malposition in thoracostomies with the midclavicular approach was not different from that with the lateral approach.

Complications in tube thoracostomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tube thoracostomy (TT) complications and their reported rates are highly variable (1-40%) and inconsistently classified. Consistent TT complication classification must be applied to compare reported literature to standardize TT placement. We aim to determine the overall TT-related complication rates in patients receiving TT for traumatic indications using uniform definitions.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis was performed assessing TT-related complications. Comprehensive search of several databases (1975-2015) was conducted. We included studies that reported on bedside TT insertion (≥22 Fr) in trauma patients. Data were abstracted from eligible articles by independent reviewers with discrepancies reconciled by a third. Analyses were based on complication category subtypes: insertional, positional, removal, infection/immunologic/education, and malfunction.

RESULTS

Database search resulted in 478 studies; after applying criteria 29 studies were analyzed representing 4,981 TTs. Injury mechanisms included blunt 60% (49-71), stab 27% (17-34), and gunshot 13% (7.8-10). Overall, median complication rate was 19% (95% confidence interval, 14-24.3). Complication subtypes included insertional (15.3%), positional (53.1%), removal (16.2%), infection/immunologic (14.8%), and malfunction (0.6%). Complication rates did not change significantly over time for insertional, immunologic, or removal p = 0.8. Over time, there was a decrease in infectious TT-related complications as well as an increase in positional TT complications.

CONCLUSION

Generation of evidence-based approaches to improve TT insertion outcomes is difficult because a variety of complication classifications has been used. This meta-analysis of complications after TT insertion in trauma patients suggests that complications have not changed over time remaining stable at 19% over the past three decades.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review and meta-analysis, level III.

X-ray indices of chest drain malposition after insertion for drainage of pneumothorax in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Chest drain (CD) migration in the pleural cavity may result in inadequate drainage of pneumothorax. The aim of this study was to assess several parameters that might help in diagnosing CD migration on chest X-ray (CXR).

METHODS

Patients with a CD inserted from the safe triangle with a subsequent supine CXR and CT scan performed less than 24 hours apart were assessed for CD foreshortening, angle of inclination of the CD, and CD tortuosity. CD foreshortening was expressed as a ratio between CD length measured in coronal plane only and CD length inside the pleural cavity measured on CT. The angle of inclination of the CD was measured as the angle between the horizontal line and CD at the pleural space entry on CXR. CD tortuosity was calculated as a ratio between the distance from CD pleural space entry to the tip of the CD and the length of CD from the pleural space entry to its tip on CXR.

RESULTS

Altogether 28 patients were included in the study. The median time between the CXR and CT examinations was 5.4 hours (IQR, 3.8-6.9 hours). CD foreshortening was the best clue of a misplaced CD with AUC of 0.93, 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity for a cut-off value of 82%. The angle of CD inclination was greater in patients with misplaced CD with AUC of 0.83, 75% sensitivity and 92% specificity for a cut-off of 50 degrees. The performance of CD tortuosity was poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater foreshortening of the CD and a steep angle of inclination of the CD above the horizontal at chest entry should raise suspicion of CD migration and mandate further investigation by chest ultrasound to rule out residual pneumothorax occult on CXR.

External Validation of a Tube Thoracostomy Complication Classification System

BACKGROUND

Tube thoracostomy (TT) is a commonly performed procedure which is associated with significant complication rates. Currently, there is no validated taxonomy to classify and compare TT complications across different populations. This study aims to validate such TT complication taxonomy in a cohort of South African trauma patients.

METHODS

Post hoc analysis of a prospectively collected trauma database from Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service (PMTS) in South Africa was performed for the period January 2010 to December 2013. Baseline demographics, mechanism of injury and complications were collected and categorized according to published classification protocols. All patients requiring bedside TT were included in the study. Patients who necessitated operatively placed or image-guided TT insertion were excluded. Summary and univariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1010 patients underwent TT. The mean age was (±SD) of 26 ± 8 years. Unilateral TTs were inserted in n = 966 (96%) and bilateral in n = 44 (4%). Complications developed in 162 (16%) patients. Penetrating injury was associated with lower complication rate (11%) than blunt injury (26%), p = 0.0001. Higher complication rate was seen in TT placed by interns (17%) compared to TT placed by residents (7%), p = 0.0001. Complications were classified as: insertional (38%), positional (44%), removal (9%), infective/immunologic (9%), and instructional, educational or equipment related (0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite being developed in the USA, this classification system is robust and was able to comprehensively assign and categorize all the complications of TT in this South African trauma cohort. A universal standardized definition and classification system permits equitable comparisons of complication rates. The use of this classification taxonomy may help develop strategies to improve TT placement techniques and reduce the complications associated with the procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

STUDY TYPE

Single Institution Retrospective review.

Unusual Malposition of a Chest Tube, Intrathoracic but Extrapleural

Chest tube malpositioning is reported to be the most common complication associated with tube thoracostomy. Intraparenchymal and intrafissural malpositions are the most commonly reported tube sites. We present a case about a 21-year-old patient with cystic fibrosis who was admitted due to bronchiectasis exacerbation and developed a right-sided pneumothorax for which a chest tube was inserted. Partial initial improvement in the pneumothorax was noted on the chest radiograph, after which the chest tube stopped functioning and the pneumothorax remained for 19 days. Chest computed tomography was done and revealed a malpositioned chest tube in the right side located inside the thoracic cavity but outside the pleural cavity (intrathoracic, extrapleural). The removed chest tube was patent with no obstructing materials in its lumen. A new thoracostomy tube was inserted and complete resolution of the pneumothorax followed.

Tube Thoracostomy Complications Increase Cost

BACKGROUND

Tube thoracostomy (TT) can be an effective therapy for thoracic pathologies. Ineffective placement of TT is common and associated with significant complications. Complications require additional interventions to repair damaged tissues or replace dysfunctional TT. We hypothesize that complicated TT insertion increases cost to the hospital system.

METHODS

Adult trauma patients requiring TT at a level 1 trauma center (2012-2013) were reviewed. Intraoperative or image-guided TT placements were excluded. Baseline demographics and TT insertion cost (normalized and assigned by hospital billing records) were recorded. Costs included initial TT equipment, radiographs, and subsequent operative or radiologic intervention to correct TT complications. Complications were categorized using previously validated method. Secondary outcomes included: number of TT inserted, number of chest radiographs performed, and TT dwell time utilizing a standardized TT discontinuation protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients with 246 TT were included. Ninety TT (37%) had complication. Complication categories are postremoval (n = 15, 16.7%), insertional (n = 13, 14.4%), positional (n = 62, 68.9%). Overall median complicated TT cost was 9 times greater than uncomplicated TT insertion, p = 0.001. Insertional complications median cost 21 times greater than an uncomplicated, due to operative and radiologic interventions (p = 0.0001). Positional and postremoval complication rates increased median cost by 3 times compared to uncomplicated TT (p = 0.03). Operative or radiologic interventions (n = 10) were performed for organ injury or uncontrolled hemo-/pneumothorax. Increased dwell time median [IQR] was associated with complicated TT compared to uncomplicated 3 [1-5] versus 2 [1-3], p = 0.01.

CONCLUSION

TT is a common procedure. TT complications are often considered benign. However, patients with a complicated TT insertion, especially related to insertional subtypes, have markedly increased hospitalization costs due to need for operative or radiologic repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V-retrospective study.

STUDY TYPE

This is a retrospective single-institution study.

Identifying a safe site for intercostal catheter insertion using the mid-arm point (MAP)

Background: Over 85% of chest injuries requiring surgical intervention can be managed with tube thoracostomy/intercostal catheter (ICC) insertion alone. However, complication rates of ICC insertion have been reported in the literature to be as high as 37%. Insertional complications, including the incorrect identification of the safe zone chest wall location for ICC placement, are common issues, with up to 41% of insertions occurring outside of this safe area. A new biometric approach using the patient's proportional skeletal upper limb anatomy to allow correct identification of the chest wall skin site for ICC insertion may reduce complications. Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the performance of the mid-arm point (MAP) method in identifying the safe zone for ICC insertion. Methods: Thirty healthy volunteers were recruited from The Alfred Hospital, a Level I Adult Trauma Centre in Melbourne, Australia. Blinded investigators used the MAP to measure the mid-point of the adducted arm of each volunteer bilaterally. A skin marking was placed on the anterior axillary line of the adjacent chest wall, and with the arm then abducted to 90 degrees, the underlying intercostal space was identified. Results: Using the MAP method, all of the 120 measurements fell within the ‘safe zone’ of the fourth to sixth intercostal spaces bilaterally. The median intercostal space identified was the fifth space, with investigators finding this in 86% of measurements independent of age, sex, height, weight or side. Conclusion: A simple technique using the MAP is a reliable marker for the identification of the safe zone for ICC insertion in healthy volunteers. The clinical utility for patients undergoing pleural decompression and drainage needs prospective evaluation.

Visually guided tube thoracostomy insertion comparison to standard of care in a large animal model

INTRODUCTION

Tube thoracostomy (TT) is a lifesaving procedure for a variety of thoracic pathologies. The most commonly utilized method for placement involves open dissection and blind insertion. Image guided placement is commonly utilized but is limited by an inability to see distal placement location. Unfortunately, TT is not without complications. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of a disposable device to allow for visually directed TT placement compared to the standard of care in a large animal model.

METHODS

Three swine were sequentially orotracheally intubated and anesthetized. TT was conducted utilizing a novel visualization device, tube thoracostomy visual trocar (TTVT) and standard of care (open technique). Position of the TT in the chest cavity were recorded using direct thoracoscopic inspection and radiographic imaging with the operator blinded to results. Complications were evaluated using a validated complication grading system. Standard descriptive statistical analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Thirty TT were placed, 15 using TTVT technique, 15 using standard of care open technique. All of the TT placed using TTVT were without complication and in optimal position. Conversely, 27% of TT placed using standard of care open technique resulted in complications. Necropsy revealed no injury to intrathoracic organs.

CONCLUSION

Visual directed TT placement using TTVT is feasible and non-inferior to the standard of care in a large animal model. This improvement in instrumentation has the potential to greatly improve the safety of TT. Further study in humans is required.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II.

Errors and Complications in Chest Tube Placement

Chest drain placement is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in routine clinical practice. Despite the many benefits, chest tube insertion is not always a harmless procedure, and potential significant morbidity and mortality may exist. The aim of this article was to highlight the correct chest tube placement procedure and to focus on errors and clinical complications following its incorrect insertion into the chest.

Ultrasound for confirmation of thoracostomy tube placement by emergency medicine residents

Introduction

Thoracostomy tubes are placed in the Emergency Department for numerous indications, including hemothoraces, pneumothoraces, and empyemas. After insertion, a portable single view chest radiograph is typically performed minutes later to confirm thoracostomy tubes position. However, up to 2.6% of thoracostomy tubes are ultimately determined to be misplaced. Failure to adequately drain the chest in a timely manner may have disastrous consequences. Ultrasonography by expert sonographers has been previously described to evaluate thoracostomy tubes position. The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of ultrasound for confirmation of thoracostomy tubes placement by Emergency Medicine residents.

Methods

We conducted a prospective, randomized, blinded study using a cadaveric model for ultrasound confirmation of thoracostomy tube placement by resident physicians. Thirty-five Emergency Medicine residents performed a total of 140 confirmations. The primary outcome of the study was the sensitivity and specificity of EM resident-performed ultrasonography to correctly confirm thoracostomy tube placement. Secondary outcomes included time to identification, operator confidence, and subgroup analysis by resident training level.

Results

The study demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 94–100%) and specificity of 96% (95% CI 87–99%) for intrathoracic placement. Post-graduate year (PGY) 1 EM residents demonstrated 100% (95% CI 76–100%) sensitivity and 100% (95% CI 76–100%) specificity. PGY 2 EM residents demonstrated 100% (95% CI 87–100%) sensitivity and 94% (95% CI 79–99%) specificity. PGY 4 EM residents demonstrated 100% (95% CI 80–100%) sensitivity and 95% (95% CI 75–100%) specificity. The total time to identification was 16 seconds (95% CI 13–19). Overall operator confidence was 4.0/5.0 (95% CI 3.8–4.1).

Conclusion

Emergency medicine residents were able to quickly identify thoracostomy tube location using ultrasound with a high degree of accuracy in a cadaveric model after a brief educational session.

Tube Thoracostomy: A Structured Review of Case Reports and a Standardized Format for Reporting Complications

INTRODUCTION

Although seemingly straightforward, tube thoracostomy (TT) has been associated with complication rates as high as 30 %. A lack of a standardized nomenclature for reporting TT complications makes comparison and evaluation of reports impossible. We aim to develop a classification method in order to standardize the reporting of complications of TT and identify all reported complications of TT and time course in which they occurred to validate the reporting method.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews from each databases inception through November 5, 2013 was conducted. Original articles written in the English language reporting TT complications were searched. This review adhered to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. Duplicate reviewers abstracted case reports for inclusion. Cases were then sorted into one of the five complication categories by two reviewers, and in case of disagreements, settled by a third reviewer.

RESULTS

Of 751 papers reporting TT complications, 124 case reports were included for analysis. From these reports, five main categories of TT complications were identified: insertional (n = 65); positional (n = 36); removal (n = 11); infective and immunologic (n = 7); and instructional, educational, or equipment related (n = 5). Placement of TT has occurred in nearly every soft tissue and vascular structure in the thoracic cavity and intra-abdominal organs.

CONCLUSION

Our classification method provides further clarity and systematic standardization for reporting TT complications.

The role of early postmortem CT in the evaluation of support-line misplacement in patients with severe trauma

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively assess the role of early postmortem CT in evaluating support-line misplacement to improve future treatment in the trauma setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included all postmortem CT examinations that were performed for trauma patients within the 1st hour after declaration of death in our tertiary medical center between August 1, 2008, and August 31, 2013. Correct placement of the following support lines was evaluated: endotracheal tubes (ETTs), chest drains, central venous catheters (CVCs), and nasogastric tubes (NGTs). Prehospital resuscitation efforts were started in all cases.

RESULTS

Early postmortem CT was performed on average 22 minutes after declaration of death in 25 consecutive patients with severe trauma. Overall, 14 subjects (56%) had suboptimal or misplaced support lines. Of ETTs inserted into 18 trauma victims; three (17%) were mislaid in the right main bronchus and five (28%) were near or at the level of the carina. Of chest drains inserted into 13 subjects, 10 were suboptimally positioned (77%). Of CVCs inserted into eight subjects (seven femoral and one brachiocephalic), one femoral CVC (13%) was malpositioned in the soft tissues of the pelvis. Of NGTs inserted in five trauma victims, one was folded within the pharynx.

CONCLUSION

Early postmortem CT for patients who have experienced severe poly-trauma can be of important educational value to radiologists and the trauma teams, providing immediate feedback regarding the location of the support lines and possibly contributing to improved training and command of the learning curve by medical staff.

Imaging of thoracic trauma

The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the commonly encountered findings in all types of thoracic trauma. It is not intended to be a systematic review of the literature, but will discuss and illustrate the differing imaging techniques which are used to diagnose common traumatic injuries in the thorax. Interventional radiology-based therapeutic interventions will be demonstrated.

Indications and morbidity of tube thoracostomy performed for traumatic and non-traumatic free pleural effusions in a low-income setting

INTRODUCTION

Tube thoracostomy (TT) is widely used to resolve a number of pleural conditions. Few data are available on the complications of TT performed for non-traumatic conditions, especially in low income setting. The aim of this study is to analyse the indications and complications of TT performed for both traumatic and non-traumatic conditions of the chest in a low-income environment.

METHODS

This retrospective study conducted over a four years period in a the Regional Hospital, Limbe in South-West Cameroon analyses the rate and nature of complications after TT performed for both traumatic and non-traumatic conditions. Different factors related to complications are analysed.

RESULTS

We analysed 134 patients who had 186 chest tubes inserted. After placement, tubes were either connected to a water seal system (40%) or submitted to suction (60%). Most (91%) procedures were performed for a non-traumatic condition. Non-infectious pleural effusion in patients with HIV infection or pulmonary tuberculosis was the most common indication. Sixty six per-cents of procedures were carried out by a general surgeon. The complication rate was 19.35%. The most common complications included tube dislocation and pneumothorax. Most complications were solved by replacement of the tube. The nature of operator (general surgeon vs general practitioner) was a significant predictor of outcome (p < 0.01). No procedure related death was recorded.

CONCLUSION

TT is a safe and efficient procedure to drain pleural collections of both traumatic and non-traumatic origins, even in low-income settings. The incidence of complications could be reduced by a better training of general practitioners on this procedure.

A technique for visual confirmation of intrathoracic placement of tube thoracostomy using a fiberoptic laryngoscope in a cadaver

PURPOSE

Safe intrathoracic placement of chest tubes is a continual challenge. Current techniques for determining the intrathoracic location of the thoracostomy site include blunt dissection and digital exploration, with subsequent tube placement. Using current techniques, complication rates for this procedure approach 30%. We present a novel technique using available endotracheal intubation technology for determining intrathoracic placement of tube thoracostomy.

METHODS

One cadaver was used for placement of tube thoracostomy. Both sides of the thorax were prepared in the standard fashion for tube thoracostomy placement, and tube thoracostomy was performed on each hemithorax at interspaces 3 through 7. The right side of the thorax was used for standard thoracostomy placement, and the left side was used for fiberoptic visualization of thoracostomy placement using a video laryngoscope. Thoracic wall thickness was measured at all thoracostomy sites. Proper placement and any injuries were documented for each site.

RESULTS

Chest wall thickness ranged from 2.4 to 3.8 cm on the right and 2.8 to 4.0 cm on the left. With use of fiberoptic thoracostomy, no injuries were generated. During the standard thoracostomy placement in the sixth intercostal space, a pulmonary laceration was caused using blunt dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a fiberoptic laryngoscope offers a novel technique for direct visualization the thoracic space during tube thoracostomy. Further studies are needed to determine the safety of this technique in patients.

Results of thoracic drainages placed in air rescue

INTRODUCTION

horax injuries are to be found in approximately 78% amongst all accident victims. Moreover, they implicate an increase in mortality rate. Consequently, an adequate contemporary treatment has to begin preclinically, even if the conditions are less comfortable than in a clinical setting. Emergency doctors need to be familiar with the placement of chest tubes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2010, emergency doctors of the rescue helicopter site Christoph 20 had to place chest tubes directly at the scene of an accident in 49 patients. These patients were now reidentified, and their clinical course was reevaluated. By means of apparative diagnostics, it was possible to analyze the location of the tubes tip. Following a comparison of the patient, outcome versus the quality of preclinical thoracic discharge could be made.

RESULTS

The preclinical placement of a chest tube became necessary mainly because of a blunt thoracic trauma. This was predominantly related to victims of traffic accidents, whereas male victims clearly dominated. Forty-two of those patients received further treatment at the Klinikum Bayreuth hospital, enabling an analysis of the tubes location by CAT (computed axial tomography) scan. Six patients had been discharged on both sides, contributing to 48 tube tips that could be examined concerning their location. Of the 48 chest tubes, 46 had been placed from a lateral approach. The ventral access by Monaldi had only been chosen in two cases. Altogether, nine incorrect placements, mainly within the right interlobe gap, had been detected.

CONCLUSIONS

The study collective showed a significant preference to the lateral approach when placing a chest tube at the emergency scene of an accident. In total, a prevalence of 19% incorrect placements could be revealed, meaning the chest tube had either been placed within the lung parenchyma, the interlobe gap, or extrathoracically. Concerning the patient outcome, no statistically significant difference regarding the clinical course after incorrect chest tube placement could be identified.

Sonographic Identification of Tube Thoracostomy Study (SITTS): Confirmation of Intrathoracic Placement

INTRODUCTION

Thoracostomy tubes (TT) are commonly placed in the management of surgical, emergency, and trauma patients and chest radiographs (CXR) and computed tomography (CT) are performed to confirm placement. Ultrasound (US) has not previously been used as a means to confirm intrathoracic placement of chest tubes. This study involves a novel application of US to demonstrate chest tubes passing through the pleural line, thus confirming intrathoracic placement.

METHODS

This was an observational proof-of-concept study using a convenience sample of patients with TTs at a tertiary-care university hospital. Bedside US was performed by the primary investigator using first the low-frequency (5-1 MHz) followed by the high-frequency (10-5 MHz) transducers, in both 2-dimensional gray-scale and M-modes in a uniform manner. The TTs were identified in transverse and longitudinal views by starting at the skin entry point and scanning to where the TT passed the pleural line, entering the intrathoracic region. All US images were reviewed by US fellowship-trained emergency physicians. CXRs and CTs were used as the standard for confirmation of TT placement.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients with a total of 21 TTs were enrolled. TTs were visualized entering the intrathoracic space in 100% of cases. They were subjectively best visualized with the high-frequency (10-5 MHz) linear transducer. Sixteen TTs were evaluated using M-mode. TTs produced a distinct pattern on M-mode.

CONCLUSION

Bedside US can visualize the TT and its entrance into the thoracic cavity and it can distinguish it from the pleural line by a characteristic M-mode pattern. This is best visualized with the high-frequency (10-5 MHz) linear transducer.

Imaging review of procedural and periprocedural complications of central venous lines, percutaneous intrathoracic drains, and nasogastric tubes

Placements of central venous lines (CVC), percutaneous intrathoracic drains (ITDs), and nasogastric tubes (NGTs) are some of the most common interventional procedures performed on patients that are unconscious and in almost all intensive care/high dependency patients in one form or the other. These are standard procedures within the remit of physicians, and other trained health professionals. Procedural complications may occur in 7%–15% of patients depending upon the intervention and experience of the operator. Most complications are minor, but other serious complications may add significantly to morbidity and even mortality of already compromised patients. Imaging findings are the key to the detection of misplaced lines, and tubes and their prompt recognition are vital to avoid harm to the patient. It is, therefore, pertinent that healthcare professionals who perform these procedures are familiar with imaging complications of these procedures. Here, we present the imaging characteristics of procedural complications.

[Multidetector computed tomography assessment of cardiac comorbidity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease]

Cardiac comorbidity is one of the most important prognostic factors in lung disease, especially in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The imaging techniques available for the study of this systemic manifestation concomitant with COPD include heart catheterization, transthoracic echocardiography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) represents a significant advance in this field because it enables the acquisition of simultaneous studies of the cardiopulmonary anatomy that go beyond anatomic and morphologic analysis to include a functional approach to this condition. In this article, we review the practical aspects necessary to evaluate cardiac comorbidity in patients with COPD, both from the point of view of pulmonary hypertension and of the analysis of ventricular dysfunction and coronary heart disease.

Chest drain insertion is not a harmless procedure--are we doing it safely?

The incorrect insertion of a chest drain can cause serious harm or even death. All elective drains should be inserted in the 'triangle of safety' in line with the British Thoracic Society guidelines. The aim of this study was to test the awareness of junior doctors involved in inserting chest drains with these guidelines. Fifty junior doctors were questioned. Participants were asked to grade their experience of chest drain insertion and mark on a diagram where they felt was the optimum site for inserting a drain for a large pneumothorax in an elective situation. Only 44% (n=22) of doctors indicated they would insert a chest drain within the safe triangle. Level of experience, seniority and specialty all had an effect on knowledge of the correct site. Of those who had inserted drains unsupervised, 48% (n=16) would site the drain outside the safe triangle as would 75% (n=6) of those who had performed the procedure supervised. Only 25% of medics knew where to insert a drain, compared with 58% of doctors working in surgery. The majority of junior doctors do not have the basic knowledge to insert a chest drain safely. Further training in this procedure is needed for junior doctors.

An initial description of a sonographic sign that verifies intrathoracic chest tube placement

PURPOSE

An initial description of a sonographic finding predictive of intrathoracic chest tube placement.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study using unembalmed cadaveric models. Chest tubes were randomly placed intra- and extrathoracically and evaluated using ultrasound. Chest tube location was confirmed using blunt dissection followed by tactile and visual confirmation. Sonographers were blinded to chest tube position. Sonographic images obtained in a transverse orientation revealed a subcutaneous hyperechoic arc, created by the chest tube, at the insertion site. The path of the hyperechoic arc was followed cephalad. Disappearance of the hyperechoic arc signified intrathoracic chest tube placement. In contrast, continuation of a subcutaneous hyperechoic arc for the full length of the chest tube signified extrathoracic chest tube placement (the Disappearance/Intrathoracic, Continuation/Extrathoracic sign).

RESULTS

Ultrasound was used to evaluate 48 chest tube placements. All chest tube locations were identified correctly. In differentiating intra- vs extrathoracic chest tube placement, the Disappearance/Intrathoracic, Continuation/Extrathoracic sign revealed a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 83%-100%) and a specificity of 100% (95% confidence interval, 83%-100%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small study, bedside ultrasound appears to be highly sensitive and specific in differentiating intra- versus extrathoracic chest tube placement.

Small catheter tube thoracostomy: effective in managing chest trauma in stable patients

BACKGROUND

Image-guided small catheter tube thoracostomy (SCTT) is not currently used as a first-line procedure in the management of patients with chest trauma. We adopted a practice recommendation to use SCTT as a less invasive alternative in the treatment of chest injuries. We reviewed our trauma registry to evaluate our change in practice and the effectiveness of SCTT.

METHODS

Retrospective review of all tube thoracostomies (TT) performed in patients with chest injury at a level I trauma center from September 2002 through March 2006. Data collected included age, sex, indications and timing for TT, use of antibiotics, length of stay, complications, and outcomes. Large catheter tube thoracostomy (LCTT) not performed in the operating room or trauma room and all SCTT were deemed nonemergent.

RESULTS

There were 565 TT performed in 359 patients. Emergent TT was performed in 252 (70%) and nonemergent TT in 157 (44%) patients, of which 63 (40%) received LCTT and 107 (68%) received SCTT. Although SCTT was performed later after injury than nonemergent LCTT (5.5 days vs. 2.3 days, p < 0.001), average duration of SCTT was shorter (5.5 days vs. 7 days, p < 0.05). Rates of hemothoraces were similarly low for SCTT versus nonemergent LCTT (6.1% vs. 4.2%, p = NS) and rates of residual/recurrent pneumothoraces were not significantly different (8% vs. 14%, p = NS). The rate of occurrence of fibrothorax, however, was significantly lower for SCTT compared with nonemergent LCTT (0% vs. 4.2%, p < 0.05). In patients receiving a single nonemergent TT, SCTT was performed in 55 (61%) and LCTT in 35 (39%). A comparison of these groups revealed that SCTT was performed in older patients (p < 0.05), and was associated with a lower Injury Severity Score (p < 0.05) and shorter length of stay (p = 0.05). SCTT was increasingly used in younger and more seriously injured patients as our experience grew.

CONCLUSION

SCTT is effective in managing chest trauma. It is comparable with LCTT in stable trauma patients. This study supports adopting image-guided small catheter techniques in the management of chest trauma in stable patients.

Pleural decompression and drainage during trauma reception and resuscitation

This review examines pleural decompression and drainage during initial hospital adult trauma reception and resuscitation, when it is indicated for haemodynamically unstable patients with signs of pneumothorax or haemothorax. The relevant historical background, techniques, complications and current controversies are highlighted. Key findings of this review are that: 1. Needle thoracocentesis is an unreliable means of decompressing the chest of an unstable patient and should only be used as a technique of last resort. 2. Blunt dissection and digital decompression through the pleura is the essential first step for pleural decompression, as decompression of the pleural space is a primary goal during reception of the haemodynamically unstable patient with a haemothorax or pneumothorax. Drainage and insertion of a chest tube is a secondary priority. 3. Techniques to prevent tube thoracostomy (TT) complications include aseptic technique, avoidance of trocars, digital exploration of the insertion site and guidance of the tube posteriorly and superiorly during insertion. 4. Whenever possible, blunt thoracic trauma patients should undergo definitive CT imaging after TT to check for appropriate tube position.

Advanced Trauma Life Support. ABCDE from a radiological point of view

Accidents are the primary cause of death in patients aged 45 years or younger. In many countries, Advanced Trauma Life Support® (ATLS®) is the foundation on which trauma care is based. We will summarize the principles and the radiological aspects of the ATLS®, and we will discuss discrepancies with day to day practice and the radiological literature. Because the ATLS® is neither thorough nor up-to-date concerning several parts of radiology in trauma, it should not be adopted without serious attention to defining the indications and limitations pertaining to diagnostic imaging.

Perforation of the left atrium by a chest tube in a patient with cardiomegaly: management of a rare, but life-threatening complication

Perforation of the heart is a rare, but life-threatening complication of chest tube thoracostomy. We report the very unusual case where right-sided insertion of a Matthys catheter (6 F) due to pleural effusion resulted in a left atrium perforation. Heart injury was immediately considered as a continuous flow of bright red blood emerging through the chest drain. Diagnosis was confirmed by computertomography also revealing a massive cardiomegaly due to pre-existing mitral valve regurgitation. In two consecutive thoracotomies, first the Mathys drain was removed and the heart defect closed and then the mitral valve was replaced by a bio prosthesis. The extent of the cardiomegaly and the position of the left atrium were not detected pre-operatively by chest X-ray or ultrasonic device. Despite a nosocomial pneumonia, the patient fully recovered. This case shows that extreme caution is necessary when inserting chest tubes in patients where thorax imaging by X-ray or ultrasonic device does not provide a clear anatomical site. In order to minimise complications, a blunt puncturing procedure or Seldinger technique should be used and assisted by a Doppler ultrasonic device. Also early imaging by CT and Doppler ultrasonic technique should be attempted. This may reduce incidence of severe complications as in this case.