Interventional radiology procedural volume changes during COVID-19 initial phase: A tertiary level Midwest health system experience

Investigation of the Radiographic Imaging Volume and Occupational Dose of Radiologic Technologists before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to assess occupational radiation doses for radiologic technologists (RTs) in Saudi Arabia shortly before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, considering changes in imaging volume during that time. This retrospective study included the imaging volume data and the RTs' occupational dose records from a central hospital for 2019 and 2020. The occupational dose-in terms of annual and quarterly mean effective doses (AMEDs and QMEDs)-was estimated for 115 RTs using thermoluminescent dosimeter records. There was a 22% increase in the AMED in 2020 compared with 2019, though the overall imaging volume decreased by 9% in 2020. The percentage changes in AMEDs between 2019 and 2020 for general radiography (GR), computed tomography (CT), interventional radiology (IR), nuclear medicine (NM), and mammography (MG) were 45%, 56%, 9%, 18% and -2%, respectively. The highest contribution to AMEDs in 2020 for modalities was due to GR and CT procedures, accounting for 0.50 mSv and 0.58 mSv, respectively. The percentage change in imaging volumes between 2019 and 2020 depicted a slight decrease in Q2 (-1%) and a substantial decrease in Q1 (-10%), Q3 (-12%), and Q4 (-11%) for 2020. The overall percentage changes in imaging volumes in 2020 for GR (conventional and mobile), CT, IR, NM, and MG were -7% (-19% and 48%), -11%, 13%, -26%, and -46%, respectively. Investigating the changes in 2020 by comparing Q1 of 2020 (before the pandemic restrictions) with Q2 (during the pandemic restrictions and changes in workflow) revealed that the QMED during Q2 increased by 5% with a 17.4% decrease in the imaging volume. However, CT procedures were increased by 11.1% during the pandemic restrictions in Q2 of 2020, with an increase in the corresponding QMED of 66%. Moreover, mobile GR procedures increased by 21% in Q2 of 2020 compared to Q1. This study indicated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on imaging volume and occupational dose. Overall, the study observed a decrease in the imaging volume and an increase in RTs' effective doses by 2020. However, there was an increase in mobile GR and CT examinations during the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions in 2020. This study suggested that the increased mobile GR and CT examinations contributed to greater effective doses for RTs in 2020.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Interventional Radiology in Germany

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic on interventional radiology (IR) in Germany in 2020 and 2021.

MATERIALS UND METHODS

This retrospective study is based on the nationwide interventional radiology procedures documented in the quality register of the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy (DeGIR-QS-Register). The nationwide volume of interventions in the pandemic years 2020 and 2021 was compared with the pre-pandemic period (Poisson-test, Mann-Whitney test). The aggregated data were additionally evaluated by intervention type with differentiated consideration of the temporal epidemiological infection occurrence.

RESULTS

During the two pandemic years 2020 and 2021, the number of interventional procedures increased by appr. 4 % compared to the same period of the previous year (n = 190 454 and 189 447 vs. n = 183 123, respectively, p < 0.001). Only the first pandemic wave in spring 2020 (weeks 12-16) showed a significant temporary drop in the number of interventional procedures by 26 % (n = 4799, p < 0.05). This primarily involved interventions that were not immediately medically urgent, such as pain treatments or elective arterial revascularization. In contrast, interventions in the field of interventional oncology, such as port catheter implantations and local tumor ablations, remained unaffected. The decline of the first wave of infection was accompanied by a rapid recovery and a significant, partly compensatory, 14 % increase in procedure numbers in the second half of 2020 compared to the same period of the previous year (n = 77 151 vs. 67 852, p < 0.001). Subsequent pandemic waves had no effect on intervention numbers.

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic in Germany led to a significant short-term decrease in interventional radiology procedures in the initial phase. A compensatory increase in the number of procedures was observed in the subsequent period. This reflects the adaptability and robustness of IR and the high demand for minimally invasive radiological procedures in medical care.

KEY POINTS

· The study shows the nationwide pandemic-related effects on interventional radiology in Germany.. · In quantitative terms, the ongoing pandemic caused a significant, temporary decline in intervention cases only in the initial phase.. · Subsequent waves of infections had no effect on the scope of services provided by interventional radiology.. · Short-term deficits, especially in elective interventions, could be partially compensated..

CITATION FORMAT

· Schmidbauer M, Busjahn A, Paprottka P et al. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Interventional Radiology in Germany. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 597 - 604.

The management of dialysis access thrombosis during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

Maintaining patent access is essential for haemodialysis dependent end stage renal failure patients. The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected surgical and interventional radiology services worldwide. We aimed to review the impact COVID-19 has caused to the management of acute dialysis access thrombosis.

METHODS

We conducted a single centre retrospective review of outcomes of patients with arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft thrombosis between March and May 2020, which coincided with the first peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in London, and a similar period in the previous year, March-May 2019. Outcomes in both cohorts of patients were compared, including attempts at salvage, salvage success, 1-month patency rates after salvage and subsequent surgery on the same access. We also analysed the use of tunnelled haemodialysis lines (THL), either due to failed salvage attempts or when salvage was not attempted.

RESULTS

There was a similar incidence of access thrombosis in both periods (26 cases in 2019, 38 in 2020). There were 601 patients dialysing via an arteriovenous fistula or graft in 2019, and 568 patients in 2020. Access salvage, when attempted, had similar success rates and 1-month patency (salvage success 74% vs 80%, p = 0.39; 1-month patency 55% vs 62%, p = 0.69). The proportion of patients where access salvage was not attempted and a THL inserted was significantly higher in 2020 compared to 2019 (32% vs 4%, p = 0.007). There were more patients who subsequently had surgery to salvage or revise the same access in 2019 compared to 2020 (62% vs 13%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, there were fewer attempts at access salvage. This was a conscious decision due to increased pressure on the healthcare system, access to emergency interventional radiology or operative theatres and the perceived risk/benefit ratio of access salvage. The long-term effects of this change in practice remain unknown.

Chest-Related Imaging Investigations During Multiple Waves of COVID-19 Infection in Hong Kong

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant disruption to healthcare worldwide. In this study, we aim to quantify its impact of chest related radiological procedures over the different waves of local infection in Hong Kong across the territory's public hospitals.

Methods: This was an observational study enrolling patients between January 2017 and December 2020. Consecutive population-based chest radiographs, CT, US, and interventional radiology (IR) procedures were obtained public hospitals across Hong Kong.

Results: A significant reduction of 10.0% (p < 0.001) in the total number of chest radiographs was observed. Non-significant reduction of 2.5% (p = 0.0989), 39.1% (p = 0.2135), and 1.9% (p = 0.8446) was observed for Chest CT, Chest US, and Chest IR procedures, respectively, in 2020 compared to the projected values.

Conclusion: Although, it was anticipated that there would be a significant impact to health services caused by the pandemic, for chest-related investigations in Hong Kong, the impact was not as severe. Quantitative analysis could help with future planning and public health decision making.