Multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction block: Distribution of demyelination and axonal degeneration

Prevention of axonal loss after immediate dosage titration of immunoglobulin in multifocal motor neuropathy

BACKGROUND

To evaluate whether ongoing axonal loss can be prevented in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) treated with immunoglobulin G (IgG), a group of patients with a median disease duration of 15.7 years (range: 8.3-37.8), treated with titrated dosages of immunoglobulins, was studied electrophysiologically at time of diagnosis and at follow-up.

RESULTS

At follow-up, the Z-score of the compound motor action potential amplitude of the median, fibular, and tibial nerves and the neurological performances were determined. In seven patients with a treatment-free period of 0.3 years (0.2-0.4), there was no progression of axonal loss (p = 0.2), whereas a trend toward further axonal loss by 1.3 Z-scores (0.9-17.0, p = 0.06) was observed in five patients with a treatment-free period of 4.0 years (0.9-9.0). The axonal loss in the group with a short treatment delay was significantly smaller than in the group with a longer treatment delay (p = 0.02). Also, there was an association between treatment delay and ongoing axonal loss (p = 0.004). The electrophysiological findings at follow-up were associated with the isokinetic strength performance, the neurological impairment score, and the disability, supporting the clinical relevance of the electrophysiological estimate of axonal loss.

CONCLUSION

Swift initiation of an immediately titrated IgG dosage can prevent further axonal loss and disability in continuously treated MMN patients.

Motor unit integrity in multifocal motor neuropathy: A systematic evaluation with CMAP scans

Introduction/Aims

Progressive axonal loss in multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is often assessed with nerve conduction studies (NCS), by recording maximum compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs). However, reinnervation maintains the CMAP amplitude until a significant portion of the motor unit (MU) pool is lost. Therefore, we performed more informative CMAP scans to study MU characteristics in a large cohort of patients with MMN.

Methods

We derived the maximum CMAP amplitude (CMAP_max), an MU number estimate (MUNE), and the largest MU amplitude stimulus current required to elicit 5%, 50%, and 95% of CMAP_max (S5, S50, S95) and relative ranges ([S95 − S5] × 100 / S50) from the scans. These metrics were compared with clinical, laboratory, and NCS results.

Results

Forty MMN patients and 24 healthy controls were included in the study. CMAP_max and MUNE were reduced in MMN patients (both P < .001). Largest MU amplitude as a percentage of CMAP_max was increased in MMN patients (P < .001). Disease duration and treatment duration were not associated with MUNE. Relative range was larger in patients with anti‐GM1 antibodies than in those without anti‐GM1 antibodies (P = .016) and controls (P < .001). The largest MU amplitudes were larger in patients without anti‐GM1 antibodies than in patients with anti‐GM1 antibodies (P = .037) and controls (P = .044).

Discussion

We found that MU loss is common in MMN and accompanied by enlarged MUs. Presence of anti‐GM1 antibodies was associated with increased relative range of MU thresholds and reduction in largest MU amplitude. Our findings indicate that CMAP scans complement routine NCS, and may have potential for practical monitoring of treatment efficacy and disease progression.

Difference in distribution of fasciculations between multifocal motor neuropathy and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in fasciculation distribution between patients with multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) based on muscle ultrasound.

METHODS

Forty-one muscles (tongue muscle and 40 muscles of the trunk and limbs on both sides) in 5 MMN patients and 21 muscles (tongue muscle and 20 muscles on the onset side) in 21 ALS patients were subjected to muscle ultrasound individually for 60 seconds to detect the presence of fasciculations.

RESULTS

Fasciculation detection rates on the onset side were significantly higher in ALS (42.4 ± 18.3%, mean ± SD) than in MMN (21.9 ± 8.8%) patients (p < 0.05). In MMN patients, no fasciculation was detected in the tongue or truncal muscles. There was no difference in the fasciculation detection rate between the onset and non-onset sides or between upper and lower limbs in MMN patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In MMN patients, fasciculations were detected extensively in the limbs. However, the detection rate in patients with MMN was lower than in those with ALS.

SIGNIFICANCE

Demonstration of the absence of fasciculations in the tongue and truncal muscles in MMN patients by extensive muscle ultrasound examination may help distinguish MMN from ALS.

Conduction block in immune-mediated neuropathy: paranodopathy versus axonopathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conduction block is a pathognomonic feature of immune-mediated neuropathies. The aim of this study was to advance understanding of pathophysiology and conduction block in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN).

METHODS

A multimodal approach was used, incorporating clinical phenotyping, neurophysiology, immunohistochemistry and structural assessments.

RESULTS

Of 49 CIDP and 14 MMN patients, 25% and 79% had median nerve forearm block, respectively. Clinical scores were similar in CIDP patients with and without block. CIDP patients with median nerve block demonstrated markedly elevated thresholds and greater threshold changes in threshold electrotonus, whilst those without did not differ from healthy controls in electrotonus parameters. In contrast, MMN patients exhibited marked increases in superexcitability. Nerve size was similar in both CIDP groups at the site of axonal excitability. However, CIDP patients with block demonstrated more frequent paranodal serum binding to teased rat nerve fibres. In keeping with these findings, mathematical modelling of nerve excitability recordings in CIDP patients with block support the role of paranodal dysfunction and enhanced leakage of current between the node and internode. In contrast, changes in MMN probably resulted from a reduction in ion channel density along axons.

CONCLUSIONS

The underlying pathologies in CIDP and MMN are distinct. Conduction block in CIDP is associated with paranodal dysfunction which may be antibody-mediated in a subset of patients. In contrast, MMN is characterized by channel dysfunction downstream from the site of block.

Differentiating lower motor neuron syndromes

Lower motor neuron (LMN) syndromes typically present with muscle wasting and weakness and may arise from pathology affecting the distal motor nerve up to the level of the anterior horn cell. A variety of hereditary causes are recognised, including spinal muscular atrophy, distal hereditary motor neuropathy and LMN variants of familial motor neuron disease. Recent genetic advances have resulted in the identification of a variety of disease-causing mutations. Immune-mediated disorders, including multifocal motor neuropathy and variants of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, account for a proportion of LMN presentations and are important to recognise, as effective treatments are available. The present review will outline the spectrum of LMN syndromes that may develop in adulthood and provide a framework for the clinician assessing a patient presenting with predominantly LMN features.

The utility of electrodiagnostic tests for the assessment of medically unexplained weakness and sensory deficit

•

Medically unexplained symptoms (MUS) are challenge for electrodiagnostic testing.

•

Weakness and sensory deficit can be manifestations of psychogenic disorders.

•

This is a review of electrodiagnostic methods used for the assessment of MUS.

Patients with suspected medically unexplained symptoms or psychogenic disorders are frequently requested to undergo an EMG exam. However, the suspected diagnosis is not always told to the electromyography practitioner, who must be able to recognize such a condition to avoid false positive diagnosis without dismissing the possibility to uncover any true dysfunction. There are many clinical manoeuvers to assess the consistency of the patients’ reported weakness or sensory deficit. The electrodiagnostic practitioner should be aware of those clinical tricks and interpret the electrodiagnostic findings in the clinical context. There are many electrodiagnostic tests that the practitioner can use for the assessment of motor and sensory functions but these tests have also important drawbacks and limitations. Only after a good clinical evaluation would the practitioner be able to give his/her opinion on the clinical relevance of the electrodiagnostic findings. Here we review some of the tests that can help the practitioner to define the electrophysiological characteristics of a suspected functional disorder presenting with weakness or sensory deficit.

Nerve guidance conduits from aligned nanofibers: improvement of nerve regeneration through longitudinal nanogrooves on a fiber surface

A novel fibrous conduit consisting of well-aligned nanofibers with longitudinal nanogrooves on the fiber surface was prepared by electrospinning and was subjected to an in vivo nerve regeneration study on rats using a sciatic nerve injury model. For comparison, a fibrous conduit having a similar fiber alignment structure without surface groove and an autograft were also conducted in the same test. The electrophysiological, walking track, gastrocnemius muscle, triple-immunofluorescence, and immunohistological analyses indicated that grooved fibers effectively improved sciatic nerve regeneration. This is mainly attributed to the highly ordered secondary structure formed by surface grooves and an increase in the specific surface area. Fibrous conduits made of longitudinally aligned nanofibers with longitudinal nanogrooves on the fiber surface may offer a new nerve guidance conduit for peripheral nerve repair and regeneration.

Practical rules for electrodiagnosis in suspected multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) with conduction block (CB) is a rare chronic immune-mediated neuropathy, but important to diagnose as it is treatable. The key features in prototypic MMN are electrodiagnostic demonstration of focal CB away from common sites of entrapment and normal sensory conduction across these sites. However, there are challenges in distinguishing CB from the effects of abnormal temporal dispersion. Consensus electrodiagnostic criteria, reinforced by modeling studies, are available to support definite or probable CB. In addition, consideration of technical issues can guard against false-positive and false-negative conclusions. These include limb temperature, stimulus site, inadvertent stimulating electrode movement, and supramaximal and submaximal responses, as well as the possibility of Martin-Gruber anastamosis. Robust evidence supports the treatment of MMN with intravenous immunoglobulin, and guidelines have been developed. Application of practical and simple rules including a 4-step diagnostic algorithm can help practitioners correctly diagnose this treatable condition and improve patient outcomes.

Diagnosis and treatment of chronic acquired demyelinating polyneuropathies

Chronic neuropathies are operationally classified as primarily demyelinating or axonal, on the basis of electrodiagnostic or pathological criteria. Demyelinating neuropathies are further classified as hereditary or acquired-this distinction is important, because the acquired neuropathies are immune-mediated and, thus, amenable to treatment. The acquired chronic demyelinating neuropathies include chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), neuropathy associated with monoclonal IgM antibodies to myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG; anti-MAG neuropathy), multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN), and POEMS syndrome. They have characteristic--though overlapping--clinical presentations, are mediated by distinct immune mechanisms, and respond to different therapies. CIDP is the default diagnosis if the neuropathy is demyelinating and no other cause is found. Anti-MAG neuropathy is diagnosed on the basis of the presence of anti-MAG antibodies, MMN is characterized by multifocal weakness and motor conduction blocks, and POEMS syndrome is associated with IgG or IgA λ-type monoclonal gammopathy and osteosclerotic myeloma. The correct diagnosis, however, can be difficult to make in patients with atypical or overlapping presentations, or nondefinitive laboratory studies. First-line treatments include intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), corticosteroids or plasmapheresis for CIDP; IVIg for MMN; rituximab for anti-MAG neuropathy; and irradiation or chemotherapy for POEMS syndrome. A correct diagnosis is required for choosing the appropriate treatment, with the aim of preventing progressive neuropathy.

Multifocal motor neuropathy

Multifocal motor neuropathy (MMN) is a rare disorder in which the symptoms are caused by persistent conduction block lesions. The mononeuropathy multiplex progresses over time with increasing axonal loss. The cause of the conduction blocks and axonal loss are not completely understood but immune mechanisms are involved and response to intravenous immunoglobulin has been established. The importance of MMN goes beyond its clinical incidence as the increasing understanding of the pathogenesis of this disorder has implications for other peripheral nerve diseases and for our knowledge of peripheral nerve biology.

Predicting a positive response to intravenous immunoglobulin in isolated lower motor neuron syndromes

OBJECTIVE

To determine clinically related characteristics in patients with pure lower motor neuron (LMN) syndromes, not fulfilling accepted diagnostic criteria, who were likely to respond to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) treatment.

METHODS

Demographic, clinical, laboratory and neurophysiological characteristics were prospectively collected from patients with undifferentiated isolated LMN syndromes who were then treated with IVIg. Patients were classified as either responders or non-responders to therapy with IVIg based on clinical data and the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

From a total cohort of 42 patients (30 males, 12 females, aged 18-83 years), 31 patients responded to IVIg and 11 did not. Compared to patients that developed progressive neurological decline, responders were typically younger (45.8 compared to 56.0 years, P<0.05) and had upper limb (83.9% compared to 63.6%, NS), unilateral (80.6% compared to 45.5%, P<0.05), and isolated distal (54.1% compared to 9.1%, P<0.05) weakness. Patients with predominantly upper limb, asymmetrical, and distal weakness were more likely to respond to IVIg therapy. Of the patients who responded to treatment, only 12.9% had detectable GM(1) antibodies and conduction block (not fulfilling diagnostic criteria) was only identified in 22.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 70% of patients with pure LMN syndromes from the present series responded to treatment with IVIg therapy, despite a low prevalence of detectable GM(1) antibodies and conduction block. Patients with isolated LMN presentations, not fulfilling accepted diagnostic criteria, may respond to IVIg therapy, irrespective of the presence of conduction block or GM(1) antibodies, and should be given an empirical trial of IVIg to determine treatment responsiveness.