Photosensitivity in Dravet syndrome is under-recognized and related to prognosis

Peri-ictal EEG in infants with PRRT2-related self-limited infantile epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Pathogenic PRRT2 variants cause self-limited (familial) infantile epilepsy (SeLIE), which is responsive to sodium channel blocking antiseizure medications. The interictal EEG is typically normal. We describe a cohort of infants with PRRT2-related SeLIE with striking peri-ictal EEG abnormalities.

METHODS

We included all infants diagnosed with PRRT2-related SeLIE during July 2020 to November 2021 at the Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne. Clinical features and results of aetiologic investigations were collected from electronic medical records. All EEGs were reviewed independently by two epileptologists.

RESULTS

Ten infants presented with focal seizures at a median age of 5 months (range: 3-6 months). Eight had a family history of epilepsy, paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia (PKD) or hemiplegic migraine. Seven of the eight infants with an EEG performed within 24 h of the most recent seizure had epileptiform discharges. Their EEGs showed focal sharp waves, spikes, polyspikes or fast activity independently over the left and right temporo-occipital regions. Conversely, the two infants with last known seizure greater than 24 h prior to their EEG had no epileptiform discharges. Oxcarbazepine was commenced in two infants and was effective. Eight infants were initially treated with levetiracetam, and all were subsequently switched to oxcarbazepine due to ongoing seizures or side effects.

SIGNIFICANCE

Posterior polymorphic focal epileptiform discharges on a peri-ictal EEG recording are a feature of PRRT2-related SeLIE. This finding, particularly in the presence of a family history of infantile epilepsy, PKD or hemiplegic migraine, suggests a diagnosis of PRRT2-related SeLIE and has important treatment implications.

High-throughput functional analysis of autism genes in zebrafish identifies convergence in dopaminergic and neuroimmune pathways

Advancing from gene discovery in autism spectrum disorders (ASDs) to the identification of biologically relevant mechanisms remains a central challenge. Here, we perform parallel in vivo functional analysis of 10 ASD genes at the behavioral, structural, and circuit levels in zebrafish mutants, revealing both unique and overlapping effects of gene loss of function. Whole-brain mapping identifies the forebrain and cerebellum as the most significant contributors to brain size differences, while regions involved in sensory-motor control, particularly dopaminergic regions, are associated with altered baseline brain activity. Finally, we show a global increase in microglia resulting from ASD gene loss of function in select mutants, implicating neuroimmune dysfunction as a key pathway relevant to ASD biology.

Successful treatment of adult Dravet syndrome patients with cenobamate

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare, drug-resistant, severe developmental and epileptic encephalopathy caused by pathogenic variants in the α subunit of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene SCN1A. Hyperexcitability in DS results from loss of function in inhibitory interneurons. Thus sodium channel blockers are usually contraindicated in patients with DS as they may lead to disease aggravation. Cenobamate (CNB) is a novel antiseizure medication (ASM) with promising rates of seizure freedom in patients with focal-onset, drug-resistant epilepsy. CNB blocks persistent sodium currents by promoting the inactive states of sodium channels. In a multi-center study, we analyzed retrospectively the effect of an add-on therapy of CNB in adult patients with DS. We report four adult patients with DS in whom the use of CNB resulted in a significant seizure reduction of more than 80%, with a follow-up of up to 542 days. CNB was the first drug in these patients that resulted in a long-lasting and significant seizure reduction. No severe adverse events occurred. We highlight CNB as an ASM that may lead to a clinically meaningful reduction of seizure frequency in adult patients with DS. It is unclear, however, if all patients with DS benefit, requiring further investigation and functional experiments.

Genetic and phenotypic spectrum of Chinese patients with epilepsy and photosensitivity

Objective

To determine the contribution of genetic etiologies in epilepsy with photosensitivity.

Methods

A total of 35 epileptic patients with genetic photosensitivity from January 2019 to May 2021 were analyzed.

Results

Pathogenic variants were identified in 35 patients, including SCN1A(7) CHD2(6), TPP1(3), SYNGAP1(3), GABRA1(2), GABRG2(1), KCTD7(1), MFSD8(1), KCNC1(1) GBA(1), CACNA1A(1), KCNMA1(1), FLNA(1), SZT2(1), SLC2A1(1), 5q33.2-34del(1), and mitochondrial variants(3). The predominant epileptic syndrome was progressive myoclonus epilepsy (PME) and Dravet syndrome, while the most common seizure type in both spontaneous seizures and photoconvulsive response (PCR) was myoclonic seizures. The abnormal EEG background and brain MRI were mainly seen in the PME patients. In PME, initial low-frequencies (1–6 Hz) photosensitivity was observed in 70% (7/10) of patients. Among the other patients, 12 patients (48.0%, 12/25) had photosensitivity at initial low -frequencies and 12 patients (48.0%, 12/25) had photosensitivity at initial middle frequencies (6–20 Hz). At the 1-year follow-up, 77.7% (21/27) still remained photosensitive.

Conclusion

The most common genes for epilepsy with genetic photosensitivity are SCN1A and CHD2, and the most common syndromes are PME and Dravet syndrome. MFSD8, KCNMA1, SZT2, FLNA, and SLC2A1 variants might be candidate genes for photosensitivity. PPRs at initial low-frequencies may be a marker of PME, and the most typical feature of genetic photosensitivity may be low- or middle- frequencies induced PPRs. Photosensitivity in epilepsy with genetic photosensitivity may be difficult to disappear in a short period of time.

Visually sensitive seizures: An updated review by the Epilepsy Foundation

Light flashes, patterns, or color changes can provoke seizures in up to 1 in 4000 persons. Prevalence may be higher because of selection bias. The Epilepsy Foundation reviewed light-induced seizures in 2005. Since then, images on social media, virtual reality, three-dimensional (3D) movies, and the Internet have proliferated. Hundreds of studies have explored the mechanisms and presentations of photosensitive seizures, justifying an updated review. This literature summary derives from a nonsystematic literature review via PubMed using the terms "photosensitive" and "epilepsy." The photoparoxysmal response (PPR) is an electroencephalography (EEG) phenomenon, and photosensitive seizures (PS) are seizures provoked by visual stimulation. Photosensitivity is more common in the young and in specific forms of generalized epilepsy. PS can coexist with spontaneous seizures. PS are hereditable and linked to recently identified genes. Brain imaging usually is normal, but special studies imaging white matter tracts demonstrate abnormal connectivity. Occipital cortex and connected regions are hyperexcitable in subjects with light-provoked seizures. Mechanisms remain unclear. Video games, social media clips, occasional movies, and natural stimuli can provoke PS. Virtual reality and 3D images so far appear benign unless they contain specific provocative content, for example, flashes. Images with flashes brighter than 20 candelas/m² at 3-60 (particularly 15-20) Hz occupying at least 10 to 25% of the visual field are a risk, as are red color flashes or oscillating stripes. Equipment to assay for these characteristics is probably underutilized. Prevention of seizures includes avoiding provocative stimuli, covering one eye, wearing dark glasses, sitting at least two meters from screens, reducing contrast, and taking certain antiseizure drugs. Measurement of PPR suppression in a photosensitivity model can screen putative antiseizure drugs. Some countries regulate media to reduce risk. Visually-induced seizures remain significant public health hazards so they warrant ongoing scientific and regulatory efforts and public education.

SCN1A Mutation-Beyond Dravet Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Background:SCN1A is one of the most common epilepsy genes. About 80% of SCN1A gene mutations cause Dravet syndrome (DS), which is a severe and catastrophic epileptic encephalopathy. More than 1,800 mutations have been identified in SCN1A. Although it is known that SCN1A is the main cause of DS and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+), there is a dearth of information on the other related diseases caused by mutations of SCN1A.

Objective: The aim of this study is to systematically review the literature associated with SCN1A and other non-DS-related disorders.

Methods: We searched PubMed and SCOPUS for all the published cases related to gene mutations of SCN1A until October 20, 2021. The results reported by each study were summarized narratively.

Results: The PubMed and SCOPUS search yielded 2,889 items. A total of 453 studies published between 2005 and 2020 met the final inclusion criteria. Overall, 303 studies on DS, 93 on GEFS+, three on Doose syndrome, nine on the epilepsy of infancy with migrating focal seizures (EIMFS), six on the West syndrome, two on the Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS), one on the Rett syndrome, seven on the nonsyndromic epileptic encephalopathy (NEE), 19 on hemiplegia migraine, six on autism spectrum disorder (ASD), two on nonepileptic SCN1A-related sudden deaths, and two on the arthrogryposis multiplex congenital were included.

Conclusion: Aside from DS, SCN1A also causes other epileptic encephalopathies, such as GEFS+, Doose syndrome, EIMFS, West syndrome, LGS, Rett syndrome, and NEE. In addition to epilepsy, hemiplegic migraine, ASD, sudden death, and arthrogryposis multiplex congenital can also be caused by mutations of SCN1A.

Efficacy of color lenses in abolishing photosensitivity: Beyond the one-type-fits-all approach?

OBJECTIVE

Red-light filtering lenses represent an additional option to medication in photosensitive epilepsy. Blue lenses (Clarlet Z1 F133) can dramatically reduce seizure frequency, with a substantial restriction in luminance that can limit their applicability in daily life. We investigated the efficacy of 4 blue lenses with higher transmittance and reduced chromatic distortion in abolishing the photoparoxysmal EEG response (PPR) compared to the gold-standard Z1 lenses.

METHODS

We reviewed EEG data during photic-and pattern stimulation in 19 consecutive patients (6-39 years) with photosensitivity (PS). Stimulation was performed at baseline and while wearing Z1 and the four new lenses. Lenses were tested in the same session by asking the patient to wear them in a sequentially randomized fashion while stimulating again with the most provocative photic/pattern stimuli. The primary outcome was the change in the initial PPR observed for each lens, categorized as no change, reduction, and abolition.

RESULTS

Photosensitivity was detected in 17 subjects (89.5%); pattern sensitivity (PtS) was identified in 14 patients (73.7%). The highest percentages of PPR abolition/reduction were observed with Z1, for both PS and PtS. Regarding the new lenses, B1 + G1 offered the best rates, followed by B1 + G2. B1 + G3 and B1 showed lower efficacy rates, particularly for PtS. In the comparative analysis, no significant differences in PPR suppression were detected between the five lenses for PS. For PtS, the capacity of Z1 for PPR abolition was significantly higher compared with B1 + G3 and B1.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study suggests efficacy of the new group of blue lenses with potentially greater tolerability, particularly in regions with fewer sunlight hours during winter. In line with the current trend for personalized approach to treatment, this study suggests that in some patients there might be scope in extending the testing to offer the lens with the higher transmittance effective in abolishing the PPR.

[Self-induced epileptic seizures: Prevalence, Causes and Treatment]

Self-induced seizures were first described in 1827. A majority of authors found that in unselected patients with epilepsy, the prevalence rate of these seizures was 1%. In patients with photosensitive epilepsy, there was roughly a 25% prevalence. Apart from visual stimulation, many other mechanisms of self-induction have been described. A feeling of pleasure or relaxation during seizures may be a reason for self-inductive behaviour. But often the procedure of self-induction is experienced as involuntary. Treatment is always difficult. Behavioral therapy has been proven effective in some patients. In patients with photosensitive epilepsy, sunglasses are recommended. Fenfluramine, clonazepam and valproate seem to be a bit more effective than other drugs. After all, the treatment effect depends on the motivation of the patient to change the condition.

Dravet Syndrome-The Polish Family's Perspective Study

Aim: The aim of the paper is to study the prevalence of Dravet Syndrome (DS) in the Polish population and indicate different factors other than seizures reducing the quality of life in such patients. Method: A survey was conducted among caregivers of patients with DS by the members of the Polish support group of the Association for People with Severe Refractory Epilepsy DRAVET.PL. It included their experience of the diagnosis, seizures, and treatment-related adverse effects. The caregivers also completed the PedsQL survey, which showed the most important problems. The survey received 55 responses from caregivers of patients with DS (aged 2–25 years). Results: Prior to the diagnosis of DS, 85% of patients presented with status epilepticus lasting more than 30 min, and the frequency of seizures (mostly tonic-clonic or hemiconvulsions) ranged from 2 per week to hundreds per day. After the diagnosis of DS, patients remained on polytherapy (drugs recommended in DS). Before diagnosis, some of them had been on sodium channel blockers. Most patients experienced many adverse effects, including aggression and loss of appetite. The frequency of adverse effects was related to the number of drugs used in this therapy, which had an impact on the results of the PedsQL form, particularly in terms of the physical and social spheres. Intensive care unit stays due to severe status epilepticus also had an influence on the results of the PedsQL form. Conclusions: Families must be counseled on non-pharmacologic strategies to reduce seizure risk, including avoidance of triggers that commonly induce seizures (including hyperthermia, flashing lights and patterns, sleep abnormalities). In addition to addressing seizures, holistic care for a patient with Dravet syndrome must involve a multidisciplinary team that includes specialists in physical, occupational and speech therapy, neuropsychology, social work.

Dravet syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review will illustrate the electroclinical description of Dravet syndrome, highlighting the difficulty to understand the correlation between the SCN1A mutation and clinical characteristics, including the frequent comorbidities. Therefore, the efficacy of the new treatment options, which now become available, should not only focus on seizure frequency reduction but also on the long-term effects on these comorbidities, such as intellectual disability, motor and sleep problems.

RECENT FINDINGS

Comprehensive guidelines for a more standardized treatment in children with Dravet syndrome have been published. First-line and second-line treatments actually include only a few antiseizure medications, such as valproate, clobazam, stiripentol, topiramate and bromide. Cannabidiol and fenfluramine were shown to be very effective drugs and will become standard second-line drugs in Dravet syndrome. There are preliminary data showing that both drugs also have a positive effect on quality of life and on cognitive functioning. Genetic treatments in Dravet syndrome most likely will dramatically change the natural course of this refractory epilepsy syndrome.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of the full clinical picture is necessary to understand the potential value of new treatment options in Dravet syndrome. Treatment nowadays with the newer drugs becomes much more standardized and effective, and this will have a positive effect on long-term overall outcome.

Dravet syndrome: Early electroclinical findings and long-term outcome in adolescents and adults

To describe the outcome of Dravet syndrome (DS) in adolescents and adults we conducted a longitudinal retrospective study of two independent cohorts of 34 adolescents (group 1) and 50 adults (group 2). In both cohorts, we collected information about genetic mutation, and semiology of seizures at onset and during disease course. At the last evaluation, we considered the following features: epilepsy (distinguishing myoclonic/complete and nonmyoclonic/incomplete phenotype), neurologic signs, intellectual disability (ID), and behavioral disorders. Moreover, in both cohorts, we performed a correlation analysis between early characteristics of the disease and the outcome of DS with regard to seizure persistence, ID, behavioral disorder, and neurologic impairment at last evaluation. Group 1 includes 22 adolescents with complete form of DS and 12 with incomplete form; group 2 includes 35 adults with complete form and 15 with incomplete form. The seizures persisted in 73.6% of adolescents and in 80% of adults, but epilepsy severity progressively decreased through age. Seizure persistence correlated with the complete phenotype and with the occurrence of reflex seizures. At last evaluation, ID was moderate or severe in 70.5% of adolescents and in 80% of adults. The most severe cognitive and motor impairment was observed in patients with persisting seizures. The severity of cognition, language, and neurologic impairment at last evaluation correlated statistically with the complete phenotype. The study confirms that the global outcome of DS is poor in most cases, albeit epilepsy severity decreases throughout adulthood. The improvement of epilepsy throughout ages is not associated with improvement in intellectual abilities and motor skills; this confirms that the unfavorable outcome is not a pure consequence of epilepsy.

Epilepsy and brain channelopathies from infancy to adulthood

Genetic brain channelopathies result from inherited or de novo mutations of genes encoding ion channel subunits within the central nervous system. Most neurological channelopathies arise in childhood with paroxysmal or episodic symptoms, likely because of a transient impairment of homeostatic mechanisms regulating membrane excitability, and the prototypical expression of this impairment is epilepsy. Migraine, episodic ataxia and alternating hemiplegia can also occur, as well as chronic phenotypes, such as spinocerebellar ataxias, intellectual disability and autism spectrum disorder. Voltage-gated and ligand-gated channels may be involved. In most cases, a single gene may be associated with a phenotypical spectrum that shows variable expressivity. Different clinical features may arise at different ages and the adult phenotype may be remarkably modified from the syndrome onset in childhood or adolescence. Recognizing the prominent phenotypical traits of brain channelopathies is essential to perform appropriate diagnostic investigations and to provide the better care not only in the paediatric setting but also for adult patients and their caregivers. Herein, we provide an overview of genetic brain channelopathies associated with epilepsy, highlight the different molecular mechanisms and describe the different clinical characteristics which may prompt the clinician to suspect specific syndromes and to possibly establish tailored treatments.

Current Treatment Strategies and Future Treatment Options for Dravet Syndrome

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dravet syndrome is a rare but severe genetic epilepsy that has unique treatment challenges. This is a review of current and future potential treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Treatment for Dravet syndrome should encompass many aspects of the syndrome such as gait, behavior, and nutrition, as well as focus on seizure control. Many sodium channel blockers should be avoided as they are likely to exacerbate seizures. Current options for treatment include valproic acid, clobazam, stiripentol, and ketogenic diet. Testing is underway for several new treatment options with unique mechanisms of action and therapeutic targets, including the serotonin system and genetic modulation. Accurate and early diagnosis of Dravet syndrome will lead to avoidance of medications that may exacerbate seizures. Additionally, a multi-disciplinary approach and careful planning for management of episodes of status epilepticus may lead to improved outcomes. Ongoing research for novel approaches to treatment creates optimism for future improvement in outcomes.

Photosensitivity and epilepsy: Current concepts and perspectives-A narrative review

The authors review the influence of photic stimuli on the generation of epileptic seizures, addressing the first descriptions of the phenomenon and its subsequent exploration. Initially defined in the 1950's, links between intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) and seizures were well understood by the 1970. Since then the increasing exposure to photic stimuli associated with modern life (for instance through TVs, patterns, computer games and electronic instruments with flickering displays) has led to an increased interest in this issue. Diverse stimulation procedures have been described and difference in the effects of stimulation frequencies and types, colour and lighting have been recognised. Approximately 5% of patients with epilepsy have photosensitive epilepsy (PSE). PSE is commoner in younger individuals, more frequent in women, often time-limited, generally easy to treat and closely related to generalised epilepsies, especially Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME). Structural and functional studies of PSE indicate abnormalities beyond the frontal lobes and evidence for the role of the visual cortex in human PSE. A reduction in connectivity between prefrontal and frontopolar regions and increased connectivity between occipital cortex and the supplementary motor area may be the basis for triggering motor seizures in JME. Due to the changes observed in such areas, it is hypothesised that photoparoxysmal responses (PPR) could be a final expression of pathogenic phenomena in the striato-thalamocortical system, and possibly a core feature of JME as system epilepsy. The familial transmission of epileptiform responses to IPS is well-recognised, but no clear relation between PSE and specific genes has emerged. Although the influence of ethnic factors on PSE has been widely studied, clear conclusions are still lacking. Pharmacological therapeutic approaches are beyond the scope of this review although preventive measures allowing patients to avoid PS seizure initiation and/or generalisation are discussed. Given the gender/age group most commonly affected by PSE, the risks and benefits of drug treatment need to be carefully weighed up.