TMS-induced seizure cases stratified by population, stimulation protocol, and stimulation site: A systematic literature search

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Ameliorate Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment

Post-stroke cognitive impairment is a common and disabling condition with few effective therapeutic options. After stroke, neural reorganization and other neuroplastic processes occur in response to ischemic injury, which can result in clinical improvement through spontaneous recovery. Neuromodulation through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising intervention to augment underlying neuroplasticity in order to improve cognitive function. This form of neuromodulation leverages mechanisms of neuroplasticity post-stroke to optimize neural reorganization and improve function. In this review, we summarize the current state of cognitive neurorehabilitation post-stroke, the practical features of tDCS, its uses in stroke-related cognitive impairment across cognitive domains, and special considerations for the use of tDCS in the post-stroke patient population.

Accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depressive disorder: A quick path to relief?

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a safe, tolerable, and evidence-based intervention for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, even after decades of research, nearly half of the patients with MDD fail to respond to conventional TMS, with responding slowly and requiring daily attendance at the treatment site for 4-6 weeks. To intensify antidepressant efficacy and shorten treatment duration, accelerated TMS protocols, which involve multiple sessions per day over a few days, have been proposed and evaluated for safety and viability. We reviewed and summarized the current knowledge in accelerated TMS, including stimulation parameters, antidepressant efficacy, anti-suicidal efficacy, safety, and adverse effects. Limitations and suggestions for future directions are also addressed, along with a brief discussion on the application of accelerated TMS during the COVID-19 pandemic. This article is categorized under: Neuroscience > Clinical Neuroscience.

New approaches to recovery after stroke

After a stroke, several mechanisms of neural plasticity can be activated, which may lead to significant recovery. Rehabilitation therapies aim to restore surviving tissue over time and reorganize neural connections. With more patients surviving stroke with varying degrees of neurological impairment, new technologies have emerged as a promising option for better functional outcomes. This review explores restorative therapies based on brain-computer interfaces, robot-assisted and virtual reality, brain stimulation, and cell therapies. Brain-computer interfaces allow for the translation of brain signals into motor patterns. Robot-assisted and virtual reality therapies provide interactive interfaces that simulate real-life situations and physical support to compensate for lost motor function. Brain stimulation can modify the electrical activity of neurons in the affected cortex. Cell therapy may promote regeneration in damaged brain tissue. Taken together, these new approaches could substantially benefit specific deficits such as arm-motor control and cognitive impairment after stroke, and even the chronic phase of recovery, where traditional rehabilitation methods may be limited, and the window for repair is narrow.

Non-inferiority of intermittent theta burst stimulation over the left V1 vs. classical target for depression: A randomized, double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeting the visual cortex (VC) has shown antidepressant effects for major depressive disorder (MDD) in sham-controlled trials, but comparisons with rTMS targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) are lacking. We aimed to determine the non-inferiority of intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) over VC vs DLPFC for MDD.

METHODS

Participants randomly received navigated iTBS over the left V1 or the left DLPFC twice daily for 14 days with a 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17) score from baseline to treatment end, with 2.5 points as the non-inferiority margin. Secondary outcomes included: improvement in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); response and remission rates; suicidal ideation and adverse events.

RESULTS

Of 75 randomized patients, 67 completed full treatment, including 52 first-episode patients and 15 relapsers. The primary outcome indicated the non-inferiority of VC (adjusted difference 1.14, lower 97.5 % CI -1.24; p = .002), confirmed by improvements in objective cognitive task and protein levels, as did most secondary outcomes. Reduced suicidal ideation after treatment, incidence of eye discomfort and pain score were lower in the VC group.

CONCLUSIONS

Left VC iTBS has the potential to be non-inferior to DLPFC iTBS in most first-episode MDD in improving depressive symptoms and cognitive function, with less suicidal ideation and adverse events.

LIMITATIONS

Given the limited sample size, the lack of a sham control and the use of antidepressants, the findings should be interpreted with caution.

Narrative Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Stroke Rehabilitation

Stroke is a disease with a high incidence and disability rate, resulting in changes in neural network and corticoid-subcortical excitability and various functional disabilities. The aim of the present study was to discuss the current status of research and limitations and potential direction in the application of noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on post-stroke patients. This literature review focused on clinical studies and reviews. Literature retrieval was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and CNKI, using the following keywords: Repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation, Transcranial direct current stimulation, Transcranial alternating current stimulation, Transcranial alternating current stimulation, Transcranial focused ultrasound, Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation, Stroke, and Rehabilitation. We selected 200 relevant publications from 1985 to 2022. An overview of recent research on the use of NIBS on post-stroke patients, including its mechanism, therapeutic parameters, effects, and safety, is presented. It was found that NIBS has positive therapeutic effects on dysfunctions of motor, sensory, cognitive, speech, swallowing, and depression after stroke, but standardized stimulus programs are still lacking. The literature suggests that rTMS and tDCS are more beneficial to post-stroke patients, while tFUS and tVNS are currently less studied for post-stroke rehabilitation, but are also potential interventions.

A transdiagnostic review of safety, efficacy, and parameter space in accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation

BACKGROUND

Accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation (aTMS) is an emerging delivery schedule of repetitive TMS (rTMS). TMS is "accelerated" by applying two or more stimulation sessions within a day. This three-part review comprehensively reports the safety/tolerability, efficacy, and stimulation parameters affecting response across disorders.

METHODS

We used the PubMed database to identify studies administering aTMS, which we defined as applying at least two rTMS sessions within one day.

RESULTS

Our targeted literature search identified 85 aTMS studies across 18 diagnostic and healthy control groups published from July 2001 to June 2022. Excluding overlapping populations, 63 studies delivered 43,873 aTMS sessions using low frequency, high frequency, and theta burst stimulation in 1543 participants. Regarding safety, aTMS studies had similar seizure and side effect incidence rates to those reported for once daily rTMS. One seizure was reported from aTMS (0.0023% of aTMS sessions, compared with 0.0075% in once daily rTMS). The most common side effects were acute headache (28.4%), fatigue (8.6%), and scalp discomfort (8.3%), with all others under 5%. We evaluated aTMS efficacy in 23 depression studies (the condition with the most studies), finding an average response rate of 42.4% and remission rate of 28.4% (range = 0-90.5% for both). Regarding parameters, aTMS studies ranged from 2 to 10 sessions per day over 2-30 treatment days, 10-640 min between sessions, and a total of 9-104 total accelerated TMS sessions per participant (including tapering sessions). Qualitatively, response rate tends to be higher with an increasing number of sessions per day, total sessions, and total pulses.

DISCUSSION

The literature to date suggests that aTMS is safe and well-tolerated across conditions. Taken together, these early studies suggest potential effectiveness even in highly treatment refractory conditions with the added potential to reduce patient burden while also expediting response time. Future studies are warranted to systematically investigate how key aTMS parameters affect treatment outcome and durability.

Diffusion MRI-guided theta burst stimulation enhances memory and functional connectivity along the inferior longitudinal fasciculus in mild cognitive impairment

SignificanceNoninvasive theta burst stimulation (TBS) guided by brain white matter tractography is a promising approach to strengthen resting-state functional connectivity of the hippocampus and increase associative memory performance in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. With this approach, our findings add insight into how TBS propagates from the superficial stimulation site to the hippocampus along the inferior longitudinal fasciculus. Results of this study provide an innovative platform for developing a noninvasive hippocampal stimulation protocol that has great potential in enhancing memory function in mild cognitive impairment.

Safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in unipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

BACKGROUND

To study the safety and patients' tolerance of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the major depressive disorder population.

METHODS

Our study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We searched the literature published before April 30th, 2021 and performed a random-effects meta-analyses which included drop-out due to adverse events, serious adverse events and other non-serious adverse events as primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 53 randomized sham-controlled trials with 3,273 participants were included. There was no increased risk of drop-out due to an adverse event (active TMS intervention group=3.3%, sham TMS intervention group=2.3%, odds ratio = 1.30, 95% CI= 0.78-2.16, P = 0.31) or a serious adverse event (active TMS intervention group=0.9%, sham TMS intervention group=1.5%, odds ratio = 0.67, 95% CI= 0.29-1.55, P = 0.35). Our findings suggest that TMS intervention may significantly increase the risk of non-serious adverse events including: headaches (active TMS intervention group=22.6%, sham TMS intervention group=16.2%, odds ratio = 1.48, 95% CI= 1.15-1.91, P = 0.002), discomfort (active TMS intervention group=10.9%, sham TMS intervention group=5.0%, odds ratio 1.98, 95% CI= 1.22-3.21, P = 0.006) and pain (active TMS intervention group=23.8%, sham TMS intervention group=5.2%, odds ratio= 8.09, 95% CI= 4.71-13.90, P < 0.001) at the stimulation site, but these non-serious events were mostly mild and transient after TMS treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide evidence for the safety and patients' tolerance of transcranial magnetic stimulation technique as an alternative monotherapy or as an add-on treatment for major depressive disorder.

Noninvasive brain stimulation to augment language therapy for poststroke aphasia

Behavioral language treatment approaches represent the standard of care for persons with aphasia (PWA), but the benefits of these treatments are variable. Moreover, due to the logistic and financial limitations on the amount of behavioral therapy available to patients, it is often infeasible for PWA to receive behavioral interventions with the level of frequency, intensity, or duration that would provide significant and lasting benefit, underscoring the need for novel, effective treatment approaches. Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have emerged as promising neurally-based tools to enhance language abilities for PWA following stroke. This chapter first provides an overview of the methods and physiologic basis motivating the use of NIBS to enhance aphasia recovery followed by a selective review of the growing evidence of its potential as a novel therapeutic tool. Subsequent sections discuss some of the principles that may prove most useful in guiding and optimizing the effects of NIBS on aphasia recovery, focusing on how the functional state of the brain at the time of stimulation interacts with the behavioral aftereffects of neuromodulation. We conclude with a discussion of current challenges and future directions for NIBS in aphasia treatment.

The impact of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) on seizure course in people with and without epilepsy

•

Previous evidence on risk of TMS-induced seizures is anecdotal.

•

There was no evidence that TMS caused changes in epileptiform activity.

•

No seizures were induced by TMS in healthy subjects.

Objective

To elucidate the effects of single and paired-pulse TMS on seizure activity at electrographic and clinical levels in people with and without epilepsy.

Methods

A cohort of 35 people with epilepsy, two people with alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC) with no epilepsy, and 16 healthy individuals underwent single or paired-pulse TMS combined with EEG. Clinical records and subject interviews were used to examine seizure frequency four weeks before and after TMS.

Results

There were no significant differences in seizure frequency in any subject after TMS exposure. There was no occurrence of seizures in healthy individuals, and no worsening of hemiplegic attacks in people with AHC.

Conclusions

No significant changes in seizure activity were found before or after TMS.

Significance

This study adds evidence on the safety of TMS in people with and without epilepsy with follow-up of four weeks after TMS.

TMS-Induced Seizure during FDA-Approved Bilateral DMPFC Protocol for Treating OCD: A Case Report

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation therapy that has become a method of choice for the treatment of several neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression and OCD. It is considered to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment, with only few side effects. The most serious adverse event during any rTMS treatment is the potential induction of a seizure. rTMS has shown very encouraging results for treatment-resistant OCD, although the optimal target area and the stimulation frequency are still matters of controversy. Here, we present a 19-year-old female patient with OCD who experienced seizure during the 7th session of her rTMS treatment using the FDA-approved 20-Hz protocol for OCD applied bilaterally over the left and right DMPFC using a double-cone coil. Nonetheless, it still unknown whether the seizure occurred as a consequence of rTMS, as the patient was also in a specific seizure risk group. Future reviews are needed to further clarify the mechanisms that may trigger seizures during rTMS treatments in order to reduce the likelihood of rTMS-induced seizures.

Seizure risk with repetitive TMS: Survey results from over a half-million treatment sessions

BACKGROUND

Seizures are rare during repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment, but estimating risk is difficult because of study heterogeneity and sampling limitations. Moreover, there are few studies comparing rates between device manufacturers.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to calculate rTMS seizure rates across various FDA-cleared devices in naturalistic clinical settings.

METHODS

In July and August 2018, approximately 500 members of the Clinical TMS Society (CTMSS) were electronically surveyed about seizures in their practices. Seizures were distinguished from non-seizures by a remote semi-structured interview with a Board-certified neurologist and Co-Chair of the CTMSS Standards Committee. Exact Poisson calculations were used to estimate seizure rates and confidence intervals across the four most widely used manufacturers.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 134 members, with 9 responses excluded because of data inconsistencies. In total, 18 seizures were reported in 586,656 sessions and 25,526 patients across all device manufacturers. The overall seizure rate was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18, 0.48) per 10,000 sessions, and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.42, 1.11) per 1000 patients. The Brainsway H-coil seizure rate of 5.56 per 1000 patients (95% CI: 2.77,9.95) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) than the three most widely used figure- 8 coil devices' combined seizure rate of 0.14 per 1000 patients (95% CI: 0.01, 0.51).

CONCLUSION

The absolute risk of a seizure with rTMS is low, but generic Brainsway H-coil treatment appears to be associated with a higher relative risk than generic figure- 8 coil treatment. Well-designed prospective studies are warranted to further investigate this risk.

Safety Review for Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Studies using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy individuals and those with neuropsychiatric diseases have rapidly increased since the 1990s, due to the potential of rTMS to modulate the cortical excitability in the brain depending on the stimulation parameters; therefore, the safety considerations for rTMS use are expected to become more important. Wassermann published the first safety guidelines for rTMS from the consensus conference held in 1996, and Rossi and colleague then published the second safety guidelines from the multidisciplinary consensus meeting held in Siena, Italy in 2008, on behalf of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. More than 10 years after the second guidelines, the updated third safety guidelines were recently published in 2021. The general safety guidelines for conventional rTMS have not substantially changed. Because the most frequently used rTMS protocol is conventional (low- and high-frequency) rTMS in research and clinical settings, we focus on reviewing safety issues when applying conventional rTMS with a focal cortical stimulation coil. The following issues will be covered: 1) possible adverse events induced by rTMS; 2) checklists to screen for any precautions and risks before rTMS; 3) safety considerations for dosing conventional rTMS; and 4) safety considerations for using rTMS in stroke and traumatic brain injury.

Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

This article is based on a consensus conference, promoted and supported by the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN), which took place in Siena (Italy) in October 2018. The meeting intended to update the ten-year-old safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in research and clinical settings (Rossi et al., 2009). Therefore, only emerging and new issues are covered in detail, leaving still valid the 2009 recommendations regarding the description of conventional or patterned TMS protocols, the screening of subjects/patients, the need of neurophysiological monitoring for new protocols, the utilization of reference thresholds of stimulation, the managing of seizures and the list of minor side effects. New issues discussed in detail from the meeting up to April 2020 are safety issues of recently developed stimulation devices and pulse configurations; duties and responsibility of device makers; novel scenarios of TMS applications such as in the neuroimaging context or imaging-guided and robot-guided TMS; TMS interleaved with transcranial electrical stimulation; safety during paired associative stimulation interventions; and risks of using TMS to induce therapeutic seizures (magnetic seizure therapy). An update on the possible induction of seizures, theoretically the most serious risk of TMS, is provided. It has become apparent that such a risk is low, even in patients taking drugs acting on the central nervous system, at least with the use of traditional stimulation parameters and focal coils for which large data sets are available. Finally, new operational guidelines are provided for safety in planning future trials based on traditional and patterned TMS protocols, as well as a summary of the minimal training requirements for operators, and a note on ethics of neuroenhancement.