1
|
Novitskaya Y, Schulze-Bonhage A, David O, Dümpelmann M. Intracranial EEG-Based Directed Functional Connectivity in Alpha to Gamma Frequency Range Reflects Local Circuits of the Human Mesiotemporal Network. Brain Topogr 2024; 38:10. [PMID: 39436471 PMCID: PMC11496326 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01084-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024]
Abstract
To date, it is largely unknown how frequency range of neural oscillations measured with EEG is related to functional connectivity. To address this question, we investigated frequency-dependent directed functional connectivity among the structures of mesial and anterior temporal network including amygdala, hippocampus, temporal pole and parahippocampal gyrus in the living human brain. Intracranial EEG recording was obtained from 19 consecutive epilepsy patients with normal anterior mesial temporal MR imaging undergoing intracranial presurgical epilepsy diagnostics with multiple depth electrodes. We assessed intratemporal bidirectional functional connectivity using several causality measures such as Granger causality (GC), directed transfer function (DTF) and partial directed coherence (PDC) in a frequency-specific way. In order to verify the obtained results, we compared the spontaneous functional networks with intratemporal effective connectivity evaluated by means of SPES (single pulse electrical stimulation) method. The overlap with the evoked network was found for the functional connectivity assessed by the GC method, most prominent in the higher frequency bands (alpha, beta and low gamma), yet vanishing in the lower frequencies. Functional connectivity assessed by means of DTF and PCD obtained a similar directionality pattern with the exception of connectivity between hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus which showed opposite directionality of predominant information flow. Whereas previous connectivity studies reported significant divergence between spontaneous and evoked networks, our data show the role of frequency bands for the consistency of functional and evoked intratemporal directed connectivity. This has implications for the suitability of functional connectivity methods in characterizing local brain circuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yulia Novitskaya
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Andreas Schulze-Bonhage
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Center for Basics in NeuroModulation, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Olivier David
- Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
- Aix Marseille University, Inserm, U1106, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| | - Matthias Dümpelmann
- Epilepsy Center, Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Breisacher Strasse 64, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Microsystems Engineering (IMTEK), University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhai SR, Sarma SV, Gunnarsdottir K, Crone NE, Rouse AG, Cheng JJ, Kinsman MJ, Landazuri P, Uysal U, Ulloa CM, Cameron N, Inati S, Zaghloul KA, Boerwinkle VL, Wyckoff S, Barot N, González-Martínez JA, Kang JY, Smith RJ. Virtual stimulation of the interictal EEG network localizes the EZ as a measure of cortical excitability. FRONTIERS IN NETWORK PHYSIOLOGY 2024; 4:1425625. [PMID: 39229346 PMCID: PMC11368849 DOI: 10.3389/fnetp.2024.1425625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024]
Abstract
Introduction: For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, successful localization and surgical treatment of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) can bring seizure freedom. However, surgical success rates vary widely because there are currently no clinically validated biomarkers of the EZ. Highly epileptogenic regions often display increased levels of cortical excitability, which can be probed using single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES), where brief pulses of electrical current are delivered to brain tissue. It has been shown that high-amplitude responses to SPES can localize EZ regions, indicating a decreased threshold of excitability. However, performing extensive SPES in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) is time-consuming. Thus, we built patient-specific in silico dynamical network models from interictal intracranial EEG (iEEG) to test whether virtual stimulation could reveal information about the underlying network to identify highly excitable brain regions similar to physical stimulation of the brain. Methods: We performed virtual stimulation in 69 patients that were evaluated at five centers and assessed for clinical outcome 1 year post surgery. We further investigated differences in observed SPES iEEG responses of 14 patients stratified by surgical outcome. Results: Clinically-labeled EZ cortical regions exhibited higher excitability from virtual stimulation than non-EZ regions with most significant differences in successful patients and little difference in failure patients. These trends were also observed in responses to extensive SPES performed in the EMU. Finally, when excitability was used to predict whether a channel is in the EZ or not, the classifier achieved an accuracy of 91%. Discussion: This study demonstrates how excitability determined via virtual stimulation can capture valuable information about the EZ from interictal intracranial EEG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia R. Zhai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sridevi V. Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Kristin Gunnarsdottir
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Nathan E. Crone
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Adam G. Rouse
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Jennifer J. Cheng
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Michael J. Kinsman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Patrick Landazuri
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Utku Uysal
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Carol M. Ulloa
- Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Nathaniel Cameron
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States
| | - Sara Inati
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Kareem A. Zaghloul
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Varina L. Boerwinkle
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Sarah Wyckoff
- Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States
| | - Niravkumar Barot
- Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | | | - Joon Y. Kang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Rachel June Smith
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Campbell JM, Davis TS, Anderson DN, Arain A, Davis Z, Inman CS, Smith EH, Rolston JD. Macroscale traveling waves evoked by single-pulse stimulation of the human brain. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2023.03.27.534002. [PMID: 37034691 PMCID: PMC10081214 DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.27.534002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the spatiotemporal dynamics of neural signal propagation is fundamental to unraveling the complexities of brain function. Emerging evidence suggests that cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) resulting from single-pulse electrical stimulation may be used to characterize the patterns of information flow between and within brain networks. At present, the basic spatiotemporal dynamics of CCEP propagation cortically and subcortically are incompletely understood. We hypothesized that single-pulse electrical stimulation evokes neural traveling waves detectable in the three-dimensional space sampled by intracranial stereoelectroencephalography. Across a cohort of 21 adult patients with intractable epilepsy, we delivered 17,631 stimulation pulses and recorded CCEP responses in 1,019 electrode contacts. The distance between each pair of electrode contacts was approximated using three different metrics (Euclidean distance, path length, and geodesic distance), representing direct, tractographic, and transcortical propagation, respectively. For each robust CCEP, we extracted amplitude-, spectral-, and phase-based features to identify traveling waves emanating from the site of stimulation. Many evoked responses to stimulation appear to propagate as traveling waves (~14-28%), despite sparse sampling throughout the brain. These stimulation-evoked traveling waves exhibited biologically plausible propagation velocities (range 0.1-9.6 m/s). Our results reveal that direct electrical stimulation elicits neural activity with variable spatiotemporal dynamics, including the initiation of neural traveling waves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin M. Campbell
- Interdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Tyler S. Davis
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Daria Nesterovich Anderson
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amir Arain
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City School of Medicine, UT, USA
| | - Zac Davis
- Interdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology & Visual Sciences, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Cory S. Inman
- Interdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Elliot H. Smith
- Interdepartmental Program in Neuroscience, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - John D. Rolston
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Levinson LH, Sun S, Paschall CJ, Perks KM, Weaver KE, Perlmutter SI, Ko AL, Ojemann JG, Herron JA. Data processing techniques impact quantification of cortico-cortical evoked potentials. J Neurosci Methods 2024; 408:110130. [PMID: 38653381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) are a common tool for probing effective connectivity in intracranial human electrophysiology. As with all human electrophysiology data, CCEP data are highly susceptible to noise. To address noise, filters and re-referencing are often applied to CCEP data, but different processing strategies are used from study to study. NEW METHOD We systematically compare how common average re-referencing and filtering CCEP data impacts quantification. RESULTS We show that common average re-referencing and filters, particularly filters that cut out more frequencies, can significantly impact the quantification of CCEP magnitude and morphology. We identify that high cutoff high pass filters (> 0.5 Hz), low cutoff low pass filters (< 200 Hz), and common average re-referencing impact quantification across subjects. However, we also demonstrate that the presence of noise may impact CCEP quantification, and preprocessing is necessary to mitigate this. We show that filtering is more effective than re-referencing or averaging across trials for reducing most common types of noise. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS These results suggest that existing CCEP processing methods must be applied with care to maximize noise reduction and minimize changes to the data. We do not test every available processing strategy; rather we demonstrate that processing can influence the results of CCEP studies. We emphasize the importance of reporting all processing methods, particularly re-referencing methods. CONCLUSIONS We propose a general framework for choosing an appropriate processing pipeline for CCEP data, taking into consideration the noise levels of a specific dataset. We suggest that minimal gentle filtering is preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L H Levinson
- University of Washington Graduate Program in Neuroscience, 1959 NE Pacific Street, T-47, Seattle, WA 98195-7270, United States.
| | - S Sun
- University of Washington Department of Bioengineering, Box 355061, Seattle, WA 98195-5061, United States
| | - C J Paschall
- University of Washington Department of Bioengineering, Box 355061, Seattle, WA 98195-5061, United States
| | - K M Perks
- University of Washington Graduate Program in Neuroscience, 1959 NE Pacific Street, T-47, Seattle, WA 98195-7270, United States
| | - K E Weaver
- University of Washington Department of Radiology, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| | - S I Perlmutter
- University of Washington Department of Physiology and Biophysics, 1705 NE Pacific Street, HSB Room G424, Box 357290, Seattle, WA 98195-7290, United States
| | - A L Ko
- University of Washington Department of Neurological Surgery, Box 356470, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195-6470, United States
| | - J G Ojemann
- University of Washington Department of Neurological Surgery, Box 356470, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195-6470, United States
| | - J A Herron
- University of Washington Department of Neurological Surgery, Box 356470, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195-6470, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zelmann R, Paulk AC, Tian F, Balanza Villegas GA, Dezha Peralta J, Crocker B, Cosgrove GR, Richardson RM, Williams ZM, Dougherty DD, Purdon PL, Cash SS. Differential cortical network engagement during states of un/consciousness in humans. Neuron 2023; 111:3479-3495.e6. [PMID: 37659409 PMCID: PMC10843836 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
What happens in the human brain when we are unconscious? Despite substantial work, we are still unsure which brain regions are involved and how they are impacted when consciousness is disrupted. Using intracranial recordings and direct electrical stimulation, we mapped global, network, and regional involvement during wake vs. arousable unconsciousness (sleep) vs. non-arousable unconsciousness (propofol-induced general anesthesia). Information integration and complex processing we`re reduced, while variability increased in any type of unconscious state. These changes were more pronounced during anesthesia than sleep and involved different cortical engagement. During sleep, changes were mostly uniformly distributed across the brain, whereas during anesthesia, the prefrontal cortex was the most disrupted, suggesting that the lack of arousability during anesthesia results not from just altered overall physiology but from a disconnection between the prefrontal and other brain areas. These findings provide direct evidence for different neural dynamics during loss of consciousness compared with loss of arousability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rina Zelmann
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Angelique C Paulk
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fangyun Tian
- Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Britni Crocker
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard-MIT Health Sciences and Technology, Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R Mark Richardson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ziv M Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Darin D Dougherty
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Patrick L Purdon
- Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sydney S Cash
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bernabei JM, Li A, Revell AY, Smith RJ, Gunnarsdottir KM, Ong IZ, Davis KA, Sinha N, Sarma S, Litt B. Quantitative approaches to guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG. Brain 2023; 146:2248-2258. [PMID: 36623936 PMCID: PMC10232272 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awad007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 12/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, the drive to improve outcomes from epilepsy surgery has stimulated widespread interest in methods to quantitatively guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG (iEEG). Many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, in part due to the challenges in subjective iEEG interpretation. To address this clinical need, quantitative iEEG analytics have been developed using a variety of approaches, spanning studies of seizures, interictal periods, and their transitions, and encompass a range of techniques including electrographic signal analysis, dynamical systems modeling, machine learning and graph theory. Unfortunately, many methods fail to generalize to new data and are sensitive to differences in pathology and electrode placement. Here, we critically review selected literature on computational methods of identifying the epileptogenic zone from iEEG. We highlight shared methodological challenges common to many studies in this field and propose ways that they can be addressed. One fundamental common pitfall is a lack of open-source, high-quality data, which we specifically address by sharing a centralized high-quality, well-annotated, multicentre dataset consisting of >100 patients to support larger and more rigorous studies. Ultimately, we provide a road map to help these tools reach clinical trials and hope to improve the lives of future patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John M Bernabei
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Adam Li
- Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
| | - Andrew Y Revell
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
- Neuroengineering Program, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
| | - Kristin M Gunnarsdottir
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Ian Z Ong
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kathryn A Davis
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Nishant Sinha
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sridevi Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Brian Litt
- Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering & Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Center for Neuroengineering & Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hays MA, Kamali G, Koubeissi MZ, Sarma SV, Crone NE, Smith RJ, Kang JY. Towards optimizing single pulse electrical stimulation: High current intensity, short pulse width stimulation most effectively elicits evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:772-782. [PMID: 37141936 PMCID: PMC10330807 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is increasingly used to study effective connectivity, the effects of varying stimulation parameters on the resulting cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) have not been systematically explored. OBJECTIVE We sought to understand the interacting effects of stimulation pulse width, current intensity, and charge on CCEPs through an extensive testing of this parameter space and analysis of several response metrics. METHODS We conducted SPES in 11 patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring using five combinations of current intensity (1.5, 2.0, 3.0, 5.0, and 7.5 mA) and pulse width at each of three charges (0.750, 1.125, and 1.500 μC/phase) to study how CCEP amplitude, distribution, latency, morphology, and stimulus artifact amplitude vary with each parameter. RESULTS Stimulations with a greater charge or a greater current intensity and shorter pulse width at a given charge generally resulted in greater CCEP amplitudes and spatial distributions, shorter latencies, and increased waveform correlation. These effects interacted such that stimulations with the lowest charge and highest current intensities resulted in greater response amplitudes and spatial distributions than stimulations with the highest charge and lowest current intensities. Stimulus artifact amplitude increased with charge, but this could be mitigated by using shorter pulse widths. CONCLUSIONS Our results indicate that individual combinations of current intensity and pulse width, in addition to charge, are important determinants of CCEP magnitude, morphology, and spatial extent. Together, these findings suggest that high current intensity, short pulse width stimulations are optimal SPES settings for eliciting strong and consistent responses while minimizing charge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Hays
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Golnoosh Kamali
- Johns Hopkins Technology Ventures, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Sridevi V Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathan E Crone
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA; Department of Neuroengineering, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Joon Y Kang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jedynak M, Boyer A, Chanteloup-Forêt B, Bhattacharjee M, Saubat C, Tadel F, Kahane P, David O. Variability of Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation Responses Recorded with Intracranial Electroencephalography in Epileptic Patients. Brain Topogr 2023; 36:119-127. [PMID: 36520342 PMCID: PMC9834344 DOI: 10.1007/s10548-022-00928-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Cohort studies of brain stimulations performed with stereo-electroencephalographic (SEEG) electrodes in epileptic patients allow to derive large scale functional connectivity. It is known, however, that brain responses to electrical or magnetic stimulation techniques are not always reproducible. Here, we study variability of responses to single pulse SEEG electrical stimulation. We introduce a second-order probability analysis, i.e. we extend estimation of connection probabilities, defined as the proportion of responses trespassing a statistical threshold (determined in terms of Z-score with respect to spontaneous neuronal activity before stimulation) over all responses and derived from a number of individual measurements, to an analysis of pairs of measurements.Data from 445 patients were processed. We found that variability between two equivalent measurements is substantial in particular conditions. For long ( > ~ 90 mm) distances between stimulating and recording sites, and threshold value Z = 3, correlation between measurements drops almost to zero. In general, it remains below 0.5 when the threshold is smaller than Z = 4 or the stimulating current intensity is 1 mA. It grows with an increase of either of these factors. Variability is independent of interictal spiking rates in the stimulating and recording sites.We conclude that responses to SEEG stimulation in the human brain are variable, i.e. in a subject at rest, two stimulation trains performed at the same electrode contacts and with the same protocol can give discrepant results. Our findings highlight an advantage of probabilistic interpretation of such results even in the context of a single individual.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Jedynak
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France.
- Aix Marseille Université, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France.
| | - Anthony Boyer
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France
- Aix Marseille Université, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| | | | - Manik Bhattacharjee
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France
- Aix Marseille Université, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| | - Carole Saubat
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France
| | - François Tadel
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France
- Signal and Image Processing Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Philippe Kahane
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France
- Neurology Department, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Olivier David
- Grenoble Institut Neurosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Inserm, U1216, 38000, Grenoble, France
- Aix Marseille Université, Inserm, INS, Institut de Neurosciences des Systèmes, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hays MA, Smith RJ, Wang Y, Coogan C, Sarma SV, Crone NE, Kang JY. Cortico-cortical evoked potentials in response to varying stimulation intensity improves seizure localization. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 145:119-128. [PMID: 36127246 PMCID: PMC9771930 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE As single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) is increasingly utilized to help localize the seizure onset zone (SOZ), it is important to understand how stimulation intensity can affect the ability to use cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) to delineate epileptogenic regions. METHODS We studied 15 drug-resistant epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring and SPES with titrations of stimulation intensity. The N1 amplitude and distribution of CCEPs elicited in the SOZ and non-seizure onset zone (nSOZ) were quantified at each intensity. The separability of the SOZ and nSOZ using N1 amplitudes was compared between models using responses to titrations, responses to one maximal intensity, or both. RESULTS At 2 mA and above, the increase in N1 amplitude with current intensity was greater for responses within the SOZ, and SOZ response distribution was maximized by 4-6 mA. Models incorporating titrations achieved better separability of SOZ and nSOZ compared to those using one maximal intensity. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that differences in CCEP amplitude over a range of current intensities can improve discriminability of SOZ regions. SIGNIFICANCE This study provides insight into the underlying excitability of the SOZ and how differences in current-dependent amplitudes of CCEPs may be used to help localize epileptogenic sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark A Hays
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Rachel J Smith
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Yujing Wang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Christopher Coogan
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sridevi V Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nathan E Crone
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Joon Y Kang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Smith RJ, Hays MA, Kamali G, Coogan C, Crone NE, Kang JY, Sarma SV. Stimulating native seizures with neural resonance: a new approach to localize the seizure onset zone. Brain 2022; 145:3886-3900. [PMID: 35703986 PMCID: PMC10200285 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awac214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Successful outcomes in epilepsy surgery rely on the accurate localization of the seizure onset zone. Localizing the seizure onset zone is often a costly and time-consuming process wherein a patient undergoes intracranial EEG monitoring, and a team of clinicians wait for seizures to occur. Clinicians then analyse the intracranial EEG before each seizure onset to identify the seizure onset zone and localization accuracy increases when more seizures are captured. In this study, we develop a new approach to guide clinicians to actively elicit seizures with electrical stimulation. We propose that a brain region belongs to the seizure onset zone if a periodic stimulation at a particular frequency produces large amplitude oscillations in the intracranial EEG network that propagate seizure activity. Such responses occur when there is 'resonance' in the intracranial EEG network, and the resonant frequency can be detected by observing a sharp peak in the magnitude versus frequency response curve, called a Bode plot. To test our hypothesis, we analysed single-pulse electrical stimulation response data in 32 epilepsy patients undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring. For each patient and each stimulated brain region, we constructed a Bode plot by estimating a transfer function model from the intracranial EEG 'impulse' or single-pulse electrical stimulation response. The Bode plots were then analysed for evidence of resonance. First, we showed that when Bode plot features were used as a marker of the seizure onset zone, it distinguished successful from failed surgical outcomes with an area under the curve of 0.83, an accuracy that surpassed current methods of analysis with cortico-cortical evoked potential amplitude and cortico-cortical spectral responses. Then, we retrospectively showed that three out of five native seizures accidentally triggered in four patients during routine periodic stimulation at a given frequency corresponded to a resonant peak in the Bode plot. Last, we prospectively stimulated peak resonant frequencies gleaned from the Bode plots to elicit seizures in six patients, and this resulted in an induction of three seizures and three auras in these patients. These findings suggest neural resonance as a new biomarker of the seizure onset zone that can guide clinicians in eliciting native seizures to more quickly and accurately localize the seizure onset zone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel J Smith
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Mark A Hays
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Golnoosh Kamali
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| | - Christopher Coogan
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Nathan E Crone
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Joon Y Kang
- Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Sridevi V Sarma
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
- Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
| |
Collapse
|