Efficacy and effects on lipid metabolism of combination treatment with losartan + hydrochlorothiazide versus losartan + amlodipine: a 48-week prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial

Comparison of the effects of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors and thiazide diuretic/renin-angiotensin system inhibitor combination therapy in hypertensive patients: a retrospective cohort study

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs) have been approved as antihypertensive agents in Japan, and thiazide diuretics (TZDs) are widely used concomitantly with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) for hypertension. This retrospective study included patients with hypertension who switched from RASI to ARNI therapy (ARNI group) and those who were prescribed TZDs with RASIs (TZD/RASI group). Drug-related changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), blood pressure (BP), body weight (BW), serum electrolytes, uric acid (UA), and triglyceride levels were compared between the two groups. Overall, 70 participants (31 and 39 in the ARNI and TZD/RASI groups, respectively) were enrolled and observed for a median of 2 months. According to linear mixed models, compared with the TZD/RASI group, the ARNI group exhibited a significant change in mean eGFR of 3.71 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.57-6.84; P = 0.02] from the time of switching drug to the next outpatient visit. Further, compared with the TZD/RASI group, the ARNI group exhibited significant changes in mean serum UA (-1.27; 95% CI, -1.66 to -0.88), sodium (1.22; 95% CI, 0.12 to -2.32), chloride (2.14; 95% CI, 0.75-3.52), and triglyceride (-52.1; 95% CI, -100.9 to -3.29) levels. Conversely, serum potassium levels, BW, and systolic and diastolic BP did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.69, 0.44, 0.49, and 0.66, respectively). Compared with the combination therapy of TZD and RASI, ARNI therapy causes less renal dysfunction, hyperuricemia, and hypertriglyceridemia with fewer electrolyte abnormalities and no significant difference in antihypertensive effects.

Renal outcomes of diabetic patients treated with combination therapy of ACE inhibitors plus either thiazide diuretics or calcium channel blockers: comparative retrospective cohort study in Northwestern Ethiopia

OBJECTIVE

The study determined the comparative renal functions on patients with diabetes treated with ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) plus either thiazide diuretics or calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in Northwestern Ethiopia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study design was employed to collect the data from medical records of patients with diabetes followed for 1-5 years (N=404).

SETTING

The medical records of patients in chronic diabetic follow-up clinics of the hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

All the patients with diabetes medical records in Northwestern Ethiopian specialised hospital.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Exposures were ACEIs plus thiazide diuretics or CCBs collected from March to June 2020. Outcomes were defined as declining in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values by ≥30% from the baseline recorded from 2015 to 2019. Descriptive and analytical statistics were illustrated to compare the study groups. Kaplan-Meier with log- rank test was used to plot the survival analyses curve. Potential factors substantially associated to renal events were examined using cox proportional hazards model.

RESULT

About 20% of patients developed renal events and significant numbers were from hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) users. The mean eGFR levels were significantly higher in patients on CCBs users over the follow-up years compared with HCT-based users. The CCBs users had an 18.8 mL/min/1.73 m2 higher in eGFR levels at the end of the follow-up period than HCT users (p<0.001). HCT users had shorter survival probability overtime to develop the outcomes compared with CCBs users (p=0.003). The CCBs-based regimen prevented risks of declining in renal function by 56.4% than HCT (p=0.001). Hazards of declining in eGFR levels were 93% higher for the patients with initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) levels were more than 150 mm Hg (p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Compared with HCT, patients on CCBs had significantly prevented risks of renal events. However, both groups appeared with the same cardiovascular events. HCT-based regimen and higher initial SBP levels were significantly associated with eGFR reductions.

Thiazide Diuretic-Induced Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Prior meta-analyses measuring thiazide-induced glycemic change have demonstrated an increased risk of incident diabetes; however, this measure's definition has changed over time.

AIM

To determine the magnitude of change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) for thiazide diuretics.

DATA SOURCES

A research librarian designed and conducted searches in Medline®, EMBASE, and EBM Reviews-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (inception through July 2018) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (inception to December 2014).

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized, controlled trials comparing a thiazide or thiazide-like diuretic to any comparator reporting FPG were identified. Trials enrolling < 50 participants, those with a follow-up period of < 4 weeks, and conference abstracts were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Independent duplicate screening of citations and full-text articles, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias was conducted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ninety-five studies were included (N = 76,608 participants), with thiazides compared with placebo, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system inhibitors, potassium-sparing diuretic, and others alone or in combination. Thiazide diuretics marginally increased FPG (weighted mean difference 0.20 mmol/L (95% CI 0.15-0.25); I2 = 84%) (1 mmol/L = 18 mg/dL). Results did not change substantially when considering dose or duration, comparing thiazides with placebo or an active comparator, or using thiazides as monotherapy or combination therapy, even when combined with a potassium-correcting agent.

CONCLUSION

Thiazide diuretics have a small and clinically unimportant impact on FPG.

Effect of losartan combined with amlodipine or with a thiazide on uric acid levels in hypertensive patients

Hyperuricemia leads to endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance, and has been associated with diseases such as hypertension. Antihypertensive drugs modify serum uric acid levels, however, few data are available about their combinations on uricemia. In this study we evaluate the effect of two combinations of losartan, with amlodipine or with hydrochlorothiazide, on serum uric acid levels in hypertensive patients.

METHODS

A total of 60 hypertensive patients were randomized in two groups; group LA received losartan/amlodipine (100/5 mg) once a day, whereas LH group received losartan hydrochlorothiazide (100/12.5 mg) once a day for 3 months. In both groups serum uric acid levels were measured at the beginning and end of the study. Patients were evaluated monthly for blood pressure (BP) and adverse events. Statistical analysis was performed with a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures.

RESULTS

All patients experienced a significant reduction of BP to the same extent (LA 155/94 to 123/79, LH 157/92 to 124/78 mmHg, p > 0.05). In the LA group, serum uric acid decreased from 6.5 ± 1.6 to 4.6 ± 1.3 mg/ml ( p = 0.0001), whereas in the LH group there was a nonsignificant increase from 5.82 ± 1.4 to 5.85 ± 1.5 mg/ml, ( p = 0.936). When both groups were compared, we found a significant reduction ( p < 0.00013) on serum uric acid levels in the LA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Both combinations decrease BP values to the same extent, however, LA combination showed a reduction on serum uric acid levels, which may contribute to a reduction in the metabolic risk in hypertensive patients.

Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine when added to losartan in patients with type 2 diabetes

We performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, per-protocol study to compare the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and amlodipine as add-on to losartan treatment in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. A total of 49 Japanese type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate control of blood pressure while receiving losartan 50 mg were randomly allocated to receive a fixed-dose single-pill combination of HCTZ 12.5 mg plus losartan (N = 26) or a free combination of amlodipine 5 mg plus losartan (N = 23). During 8 weeks of follow-up, changes in blood pressure and laboratory data including HbA1c, uric acid, and potassium were compared between the groups using analysis of covariance. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased in both groups, the reductions of which were greater in the amlodipine group. However, the least square mean (95 % CI) differences between groups were not statistically significant [2.3 (-6.8 to 11.4) mmHg, p = 0.618 and 2.7 (-2.4-7.9) mmHg, p = 0.293, respectively]. HbA1c increased in patients receiving HCTZ but not in the amlodipine group. Uric acid also increased in patients receiving HCTZ but decreased in patients receiving amlodipine, yielding a significant between-group difference of 1.0 (0.5-1.5) mg/dl (p < 0.001). No intra- or intergroup change was observed in serum potassium levels. This pilot study suggests that HCTZ and amlodipine result in nonsignificant effects on systolic and diastolic blood pressure reduction when administrated as add-on therapy to losartan in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes; however, addition of HCTZ may be associated with less favorable effects on metabolic profiles than amlodipine.