Vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model

Characterizing the molecular epidemiology of anaesthesia work area transmission of Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 5

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus sequence type 5 (ST5) is an emerging global threat.

AIM

To characterize the epidemiology of ST5 transmission in the anaesthesia work area.

METHODS

The retrospective cohort study analysed transmitted, prophylactic antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates involving anaesthesia work area reservoirs. Using whole-genome analysis, the epidemiology of ST5 transmission was characterized by reservoir(s) of origin, transmission location(s), portal of entry, and mode(s) of transmission. All patients were followed for at least 30 days for surgical site infection (SSI) development.

FINDINGS

Forty-one percent (18/44; 95% confidence interval: 28-56%) of isolates were ST5. Provider hands were the reservoir of origin for 28% (5/18) of transmitted ST5 vs 4% (1/26) for other STs. Provider hands were the transmission location for 28% (5/18) of ST5 vs 7% (2/26) of other STs. Stopcock contamination occurred for 8% (1/13) of ST5 isolates vs 12% (3/25) of other STs. Sixty-three percent of transmission events occurring between cases on separate operative dates involved ST5. ST5 was more likely to harbour resistance traits (ST5 median (interquartile range) 3 (2-3) vs 2 (1-2) other STs; P < 0.001) and had greater resistance to cefazolin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and/or ciprofloxacin (ST5: 3 (2-3) vs 2 (1-3) other STs; P = 0.02). ST5 was associated with three of six SSIs.

CONCLUSION

ST5 is prevalent among transmitted, prophylactic antibiotic-resistant isolates in the anaesthesia work area. Transmission involves provider hands and one patient to another on future date(s). ST5 is associated with a greater number of resistance traits and reduced in-vitro susceptibility vs other intraoperative meticillin-resistant S. aureus.

Standardized Treatment and Assessment Pathway Improves Mortality in Adults With Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: STAPH Study

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) management remains challenging for clinicians. Numerous in vitro studies report synergy when vancomycin (VAN) and daptomycin (DAP) are combined with beta-lactams (BLs), which has led to clinical implementation of these combinations. While shorter durations of bacteremia have often been reported, there has been no significant impact on mortality.

Methods

The Detroit Medical Center (DMC) developed and implemented a clinical pathway algorithm for MRSA BSI treatment in 2016 that included the early use of BL combination therapy with standard of care (VAN or DAP) and a mandatory Infectious Diseases consultation. This was a retrospective, quasi-experimental study at the DMC between 2013 and 2020. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the independent association between pathway implementation and 30-day mortality while adjusting for confounding variables.

Results

Overall, 813 adult patients treated for MRSA BSI were evaluated. Compared with prepathway (PRE) patients (n = 379), those treated postpathway (POST; n = 434) had a significant reduction in 30-day and 90-day mortality: 9.7% in POST vs 15.6% in PRE (P = .011) and 12.2% in POST vs 19.0% in PRE (P = .007), respectively.

The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher in the PRE compared with the POST group: 9.6% vs 7.2% (P = .282), respectively. After adjusting for confounding variables including Infectious Diseases consult, POST was independently associated with a reduction in 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.608; 95% CI, 0.375–0.986).

Conclusions

Implementation of an MRSA BSI treatment pathway with early use of BL reduced mortality with no increased rate of AKI. Further prospective evaluation of this pathway approach is warranted.

Vancomycin or Daptomycin Plus a β-Lactam Versus Vancomycin or Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aims: Several in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrated that adding a β-lactam to vancomycin (VAN) or daptomycin (DAP) can provide synergy against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, the results from clinical studies were controversial. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy and safety of using VAN or DAP plus a β-lactam (combination therapy) and using VAN or DAP alone (monotherapy) in MRSA bloodstream infections. Methods: We included randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating whether combination therapy can improve clinical and microbiological outcomes and safety compared to monotherapy with VAN or DAP in MRSA-related bacteremia. Results: Literature search identified 3 randomized clinical trials and 10 observational studies involving at least 1,796 patients. There were no significant associations between the combination therapy and risk of mortality within 30 days (risk ratios [RRs], 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.46), in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.59, 95% CI, 0.31-1.13) and mortality within 60-90 days (RR, 0.91, 95% CI, 0.64-1.29). There was also no evidence that there was a difference in length of hospital stay between the combination therapy and monotherapy (mean difference, -0.41 days, 95% CI, -3.41 to 2.59). However, compared with monotherapy, combination therapy seemed to have a shorter duration of bacteremia(mean difference, -1.06 days, 95% CI, -1.53 to -0.60), a lower risk of persistent bacteremia (RR, 0.63, 95% CI, 0.51-0.79) and a lower risk of bacteremia recurrence within 60-90 days (RR, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.40-0.92). There were no statistically significant differences in the total number of adverse events, including acute kidney injury (AKI) (RR, 1.52, 95% CI, 0.84-2.73), thrombocytopenia (RR, 1.13, 95% CI, 0.74-1.73), and diarrhea (RR, 1.36, 95% CI, 0.70-2.65), between patients with combination therapy and monotherapy. In subgroup analysis, when the analysis was limited to the studies comparing using DAP plus ceftaroline with monotherapy, we found that the former had a lower risk of mortality within 30 days. In addition, a subgroup analysis limited to randomized clinical trials showed that the combination therapy was associated with a higher risk of AKI compared with using VAN or DAP alone. Conclusions: Although adding a β-lactam to standard therapy seemed to experience a higher clearance compared with monotherapy in patients with MRSA bacteremia, the combination therapy did not increase survival benefits. Based on the available evidence, the combination therapy was not supported as the routine management of MRSA-related bacteremia, and both its harms and benefits should be taken into account.

What do beta-lactams add to vancomycin or daptomycin in the treatment of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia? A review

Several studies have documented the synergy between vancomycin/daptomycin and various beta-lactams, and clinical studies have studied this combination therapy in humans. We review the published literature on this topic to know the utility of the combined treatment with beta-lactams in treating bacteraemia methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. Fifteen observational studies, three randomised clinical trials and three systematics reviews are analysed in this article. Observational studies used ceftaroline, cefazolin, piperacillin/tazobactam or cefepime among the beta-lactams. Clinical trials used cloxacillin or flucloxacillin as the most used beta-lactam in two trials and ceftaroline in one. Three systematic reviews are published. One of them only includes studies with vancomycin and included six studies. The other two systematic reviews include patients with daptomycin or vancomycin and included 15 and 9 studies, respectively. Adding a beta-lactam to vancomycin or daptomycin may help shorten bacteraemia and avoid recurrences in patients with MRSA bacteraemia. There is no evidence that combined therapy improves mortality. Nephrotoxicity in clinical trials precludes the use of combination therapy mainly with cloxacillin or flucloxacillin, but systematic reviews have not found a significant difference in this point in observational studies with other beta-lactams. The role of other beta-lactams such as ceftaroline should be thoroughly studied in these patients.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of vancomycin combined with β-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections

OBJECTIVE

Vancomycin combined with β-lactams (Combo therapy) has been encouraged in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs) in recent years, but its efficacy and safety have not been systematically evaluated. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the efficacy and safety of Combo therapy in patients with MRSA BSIs.

METHODS

Relevant articles reporting on the clinical or microbiology outcomes of Combo treatment in adult patients with MRSA bacteraemia throughout November 2019 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases. Summary odds ratios (ORs) or mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were evaluated using a fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Six articles (806 patients) consisting of one RCT and five retrospective cohort studies were included in this study. The pooled data showed that Combo therapy could significantly reduce the risk of microbiological failure (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83, I² 40%, P = 0.005) and persistent bacteraemia (OR=0.48, 95% CI 0.30-0.77, I² 13%, P = 0.002), as well as shorten the duration of bacteraemia (MD = -1.06, 95% CI -1.53 to -0.60, I² 0%, P < 0.00001). In addition, it did not significantly increase the incidence of nephrotoxicity (OR = 1.17, 95% CI 0.64-2.13, I² 0%, P = 0.61). However, no significant difference was detected between the groups regarding 28/30-day mortality, MRSA-related mortality, bacteraemia relapse or length of hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that Combo therapy clears the pathogenic bacteria of MRSA bacteraemia but does not improve the clinical prognosis. As the sample size was small and most of the studies were retrospective cohort studies with substantial heterogeneity, there is a need for further studies encompassing large-scale multicentre RCTs to validate our results.

Exploring the Role of Piperacillin and Tazobactam in Combination with Vancomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Previous studies have demonstrated synergy between piperacillin (PIP)-tazobactam (TAZ) (TZP) and vancomycin (VAN) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). However, it is unknown whether PIP and/or TAZ synergizes with VAN against MRSA. We sought to determine whether PIP and/or TAZ synergizes with VAN against MRSA in vitro. The activity of PIP and/or TAZ with and without VAN (1/2 the minimum inhibitory concentration) was tested against 5 clinical MRSA isolates using a 24-h time-kill methodology. Antibiotic susceptibilities, accessory gene regulator (agr) operon functionality, and US strain type were also determined for the isolates. The combination of VAN and TZP was bactericidal against 3/5 isolates and synergistic against 4/5 isolates tested. Neither PIP nor TAZ alone combined with VAN demonstrated a significant reduction in bacterial growth. The combination of TZP and VAN was less active against the lone isolate with agr dysfunction. In summation, the combination of VAN with both PIP and TAZ was required for synergy against MRSA. This antibiotic combination may not be effective against unique MRSA strain types.

The Impact of Concomitant Empiric Cefepime on Patient Outcomes of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections Treated With Vancomycin

Background

Data suggest that vancomycin + β-lactam combinations improve clearance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSIs). However, it is unclear which specific β-lactams confer benefit. This analysis evaluates the impact of concomitant empiric cefepime on outcomes of MRSA BSIs treated with vancomycin.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of adults with MRSA BSI from 2006 to 2017. Vancomycin + cefepime therapy was defined as ≥24 hours of cefepime during the first 72 hours of vancomycin. The primary outcome was microbiologic failure, defined as BSI duration ≥7 days and/or 60-day recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between vancomycin + cefepime therapy and binary outcomes. Cause-specific and subdistribution hazard models were used to evaluate the association between vancomycin + cefepime and BSI clearance.

Results

Three hundred fifty-eight patients were included, 129 vancomycin and 229 vancomycin + cefepime. Vancomycin + cefepime therapy was independently associated with reduced microbiologic failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.488; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.271–0.741). This was driven by a reduction in the incidence of BSI durations ≥7 days (vancomycin + cefepime aOR, 0.354; 95% CI, 0.202–0.621). Vancomycin + cefepime had no association with 30-day mortality (aOR, 0.952; 95% CI, 0.435–2.425). Vancomycin + cefepime was associated with faster BSI clearance in both cause-specific (HR, 1.408; 95% CI, 1.125–1.762) and subdistribution hazard models (HR, 1.264; 95% CI, 1.040–1.536).

Conclusions

Concomitant empiric cefepime improved MRSA BSI clearance and may be useful as the β-lactam component of synergistic vancomycin + β-lactam regimens when empiric or directed gram-negative coverage is desired.

Individualising Therapy to Minimize Bacterial Multidrug Resistance

The scourge of antibiotic resistance threatens modern healthcare delivery. A contributing factor to this significant issue may be antibiotic dosing, whereby standard antibiotic regimens are unable to suppress the emergence of antibiotic resistance. This article aims to review the role of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) measures for optimising antibiotic therapy to minimise resistance emergence. It also seeks to describe the utility of combination antibiotic therapy for suppression of resistance and summarise the role of biomarkers in individualising antibiotic therapy. Scientific journals indexed in PubMed and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant articles and summarise existing evidence. Studies suggest that optimising antibiotic dosing to attain defined PK/PD ratios may limit the emergence of resistance. A maximum aminoglycoside concentration to minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio of > 20, a fluoroquinolone area under the concentration-time curve to MIC ratio of > 285 and a β-lactam trough concentration of > 6 × MIC are likely required for resistance suppression. In vitro studies demonstrate a clear advantage for some antibiotic combinations. However, clinical evidence is limited, suggesting that the use of combination regimens should be assessed on an individual patient basis. Biomarkers, such as procalcitonin, may help to individualise and reduce the duration of antibiotic treatment, which may minimise antibiotic resistance emergence during therapy. Future studies should translate laboratory-based studies into clinical trials and validate the appropriate clinical PK/PD predictors required for resistance suppression in vivo. Other adjunct strategies, such as biomarker-guided therapy or the use of antibiotic combinations require further investigation.

Morbidity, mortality, and management of methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacteremia in the USA: update on antibacterial choices and understanding

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is associated with significant healthcare costs, morbidity, and mortality in the United States. Complications of MRSA bacteremia include infective endocarditis, osteomyelitis, and sepsis, all of which are difficult to treat. Time to effective therapy and antibacterial choice greatly affect patient outcomes. Vancomycin and daptomycin remain first-line therapies; however, reports of vancomycin-associated treatment failure and reduced daptomycin susceptibility highlight the need to define alternative strategies for MRSA bacteremia treatment. In addition, several patient- and pathogen-specific factors influence the outcomes of MRSA bacteremia. It is, therefore, critical to explore the interaction between host- and pathogen-specific factors and its effect on MRSA bacteremia pathogenesis and mortality. This review discusses the factors that drive the development of MRSA bacteremia and examines alternative treatment strategies.

Outcomes of Vancomycin plus a β-Lactam versus Vancomycin Only for Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the rates of treatment failure, which was a composite of clinical and microbiologic failure, of patients receiving vancomycin and a β-lactam to those receiving vancomycin only for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia. Patients 16 to 89 years of age with MRSA bacteremia admitted to a university-affiliated hospital from 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2016 were screened for study inclusion. Patients were eligible if they received >48 h of vancomycin and a β-lactam (combination group) or vancomycin only (standard group) within 48 h after bacteremia onset. A total of 182 patients were screened: 47 were included in the standard group, and 63 were in the combination group. The combination group had a higher baseline body mass index (29.2 ± 8.0 kg/m² versus 25.8 ± 7.1 kg/m², P = 0.022), acute physiologic assessment and chronic health evaluation-II (APACHE-II) score (median [interquartile range], 21 [15 to 26] versus 16 [10 to 22], P = 0.003), and incidence of septic shock (31.8% versus 14.9%, P = 0.047). Using multivariate analysis, combination therapy was the only variable that decreased treatment failures (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 0.337 [0.142 to 0.997]), while vancomycin MIC > 1 mg/liter and male gender increased treatment failures (4.018 [1.297 to 12.444] and 2.971 [1.040 to 8.488], respectively). The 30-day mortality rates (15.0% versus 14.9%, P = 1.000) and the incidence of adverse drug events (19.1% versus 23.4%, P = 0.816) were not statistically different between the combination and standard groups. Combination therapy of vancomycin with a β-lactam led to significantly fewer treatment failures than vancomycin monotherapy for MRSA bacteremia.

Mechanisms of drug resistance: daptomycin resistance

Daptomycin (DAP) is a cyclic lipopeptide with in vitro activity against a variety of Gram-positive pathogens, including multidrug-resistant organisms. Since its introduction into clinical practice in 2003, DAP has become an important key frontline antibiotic for severe or deep-seated infections caused by Gram-positive organisms. Unfortunately, DAP resistance (DAP-R) has been extensively documented in clinically important organisms such as Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus spp., and Streptococcus spp. Studies on the mechanisms of DAP-R in Bacillus subtilis and other Gram-positive bacteria indicate that the genetic pathways of DAP-R are diverse and complex. However, a common phenomenon emerging from these mechanistic studies is that DAP-R is associated with important adaptive changes in cell wall and cell membrane homeostasis with critical changes in cell physiology. Findings related to these adaptive changes have provided novel insights into the genetics and molecular mechanisms of bacterial cell envelope stress response and the manner in which Gram-positive bacteria cope with the antimicrobial peptide attack and protect vital structures of the cell envelope, such as the cell membrane. In this review, we will examine the most recent findings related to the molecular mechanisms of resistance to DAP in relevant Gram-positive pathogens and discuss the clinical implications for therapy against these important bacteria.