Systematic Literature Review and Meta-analysis of Tumor Necrosis Factor–Alpha Experienced Rheumatoid Arthritis

Impact of treatment of rheumatoid arthritis on periodontal disease: A review

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies support a bidirectional association between rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a chronic autoimmune degenerative inflammatory joint disease, and periodontitis, a chronic inflammatory disease caused by the immune reaction to bacteria organized in biofilms. RA and periodontitis are both multifactorial chronic inflammatory diseases that share common modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors. There is no cure for RA; treatment is based on lifestyle modifications and a variety of medications: nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), glucocorticoids, and disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs, e.g., conventional synthetic DMARDs [csDMARDs]; biological DMARDs [bDMARD] and targeted synthetic DMARDs). There are molecular pathways of inflammation that are common to both RA and periodontitis. Thus, there is a potential effect of RA treatments on periodontitis. This systematic review aims to assess the impact of antirheumatic agents on periodontal conditions of patients suffering from both RA and periodontitis.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase online databases were systematically explored, and a manual search was performed to identify relevant studies published until January 2023. This review is registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42023409006).

RESULTS

A total of 2827 articles were identified, and 35 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The included studies generally show a consensus that, at normal dosage, NSAID and corticosteroids have negligible impact on periodontium. Similarly, csDMARD alone or in combination with other csDMARD demonstrated no adverse effect on periodontium. Monotherapy with bDMARD had a positive effect on periodontal pocket depths and gingival inflammation in the longitudinal studies up to 6 months but showed negligible effect on the periodontium in interventional studies with a longer follow-up (9 months and 15.1 months). However, the combination of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors + methotrexate (MTX) was associated with a rise in gingival inflammation. Due to the considerable heterogeneity of the study designs, a meta-analysis could not reasonably be performed.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of the available studies, there is evidence to suggest that bDMARD monotherapy may improve the periodontal condition of RA patients with periodontal disease to a certain extent; the concomitant medication of TNF inhibitor + MTX could worsen gingival inflammation. More data are required to understand the impact of RA therapies on periodontal health.

Does the Type of Failure and the Choice of the Second Biologic Influence Response and Persistence on Medication in Rheumatoid Arthritis?

BACKGROUND

The type of failure may predict response to a second biologic. We evaluated the response to a second tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) or non-TNFi in patients failing their initial TNFi, either primarily or secondarily.

METHODS

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were biologic-naive and had a Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) >10, who started their first TNFi for ≥3 months and then switched to a second biologic, were included in the study. Secondary failure was defined as 2 consecutive low-CDAI visits and then switching to a second biologic while they had moderate/severe CDAI. Primary failure was defined if it did not meet the definition of secondary failure, or if they had at least 1 moderate/severe CDAI after 3 months on treatment. We used multivariable logistic regression comparing primary versus secondary failure for achievement of CDAI ≤10 (primary outcome) and minimal clinically important differences (secondary outcome) at 6 months after switch.

RESULTS

Of the 462 patients included, 64.3% and 35.7% stopped the first TNFi because of a primary and secondary failure, respectively. Patients with primary failure had a more severe disease (CDAI mean, 26.39 vs. 21.61; p < 0.001). The likelihood of achieving CDAI ≤10 (odds ratio, 4.367; 95% confidence interval, 2.428-7.856) and minimal clinically important difference (odds ratio, 2.851; 95% confidence interval, 1.619-5.020) was significantly higher for secondary than primary failure regardless of choice of a second agent.

CONCLUSION

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis with secondary failure to a first TNFi responded better to a second biologic agent, regardless of the choice of biologic.

Exercise-driven exacerbation of inflammation: contribution of animal models of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis

PURPOSE

To describe the observations of studies that have explored the effects of exercise on inflammation and tissue remodeling in animal models of inflammatory arthropathies including Rheumatoid Arthritis and Spondyloarthritis.

METHODS

A search was performed at Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science databases from 2010 to 2021. The selected articles were classified into those who reported positive and negative effects of exercise, and the characteristics of their experimental designs, including the animal model, the study groups, the exercise intervention and the evaluation techniques, were detailed.

RESULTS

Thirteen original articles that met the selection criteria were included. The effects of exercise on the joint biology of mice with inflammatory arthritis were controversial. Although exercise benefits have been observed in some experimental designs, the majority of them have shown that exercise leads to exacerbation of inflammation, tissue remodeling, and processes associated with arthritis such as oxidative stress and hypoxia.

CONCLUSION

Further research is necessary as the existing guidelines do not consider the negative effects of the exercise evidenced in animal models. The potential risks of exercise for patients should be considered.

Quality of life and disease activity of patients with rheumatoid arthritis on tofacitinib and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapies

The aim of this study was to analyze the therapeutic results of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) therapy with different biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and the first Janus-activated kinase (JAK) inhibitor in real-life clinical settings. This is a prospective, observational, longitudinal study at the largest rheumatology clinic in Bulgaria conducted during the period 2012-2020. One hundred seventy-four patients were followed up for a period of one year. Patients naïve to biological therapy were consecutively assigned on the available at the time bDMARDs (infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, rituximab, golimumab, cetrolizumab, tocilizumab) or tofacitinib. We evaluated the disease activity score (DAS28-CRP), Health assessment questionnaires (HAQ) and short form 36 (SF-36) were applied at the initiation of biological therapy, after 6, and 12 months of follow-up. We analyze the changes in the two major subgroups of SF36-physical (MCS) and mental health (PCS). The age and gender distribution were similar between the groups on bDMARDs and tsDMARD. All observed indicators for disease control and QoL improve after the initiation of the biological or JAK inhibitor therapy. We also analyze the effect of therapies on DAS28-CRP, HAQ, SF-36 (PCS, MCS). Dispersion analysis for the effect of therapy measured through DAS28 between 1st and 3rd measurement shows a statically significant difference in between the average effect of therapies (p = 0.005). According to the average change in DAS28 between the first and third measurement the most effective is the golimumab (Median difference = 2.745), followed by rituximab (median = 2.305) and etanercept (median = 2.070). According to the average change in HAQ between first and third the most effective is tofacitinib (median 0.563), followed rituximab and infliximab (median 0.500 for both). Less effective in term of HAQ changes between the first and third measurement appears to be etanercept (median difference 0.250). All differences are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Regarding the changes in the QoL measured with SF-36 MCS and PCS there is no statistically significant differences in the average effect of different therapeutic agents. Tofacitinib is non-inferior in comparison to bDMARDs and improve both-disease activity and QoL in patients with RA.

Measurement of synovium and serum dual specificity phosphatase 22 level: Their inter-correlation and potency as biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis

Background

Dual specificity phosphatase 22 (DUSP22), also named as Jun N‐terminal kinase pathway associated phosphatase recently, is reported to be closely engaged in immune and inflammation regulation. This study aimed to investigate the interaction between synovium DUSP22 and serum DUSP22 levels and to explore their correlation with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) risk, inflammation, and disease activity.

Methods

Synovium and serum samples from 42 RA patients with knee involvement underwent arthroscopy, and 20 knee trauma patients were collected. Besides, serum samples from 40 healthy controls were also obtained. Synovium DUSP22 expression was detected by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction, while serum DUSP22 level was detected by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay.

Results

Synovium DUSP22 level was greatly decreased in RA patients compared to trauma controls (p < 0.001), and it was negatively correlated with tender joint count (TJC) (r = −0.318, p = 0.040), C‐reactive protein (CRP) (r = −0.330, p = 0.033), and Lysholm score (r = −0.423, p = 0.005) in RA patients. Serum DUSP22 level was lowest in RA patients, followed by trauma controls, then highest in healthy controls (p < 0.001). Serum DUSP22 level was negatively associated with TJC (r = −0.438, p = 0.004), swollen joint count (SJC) (r = −0.372, p = 0.015), CRP (r = −0.391, p = 0.011), and disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28_ESR) score (r = −0.406, p = 0.008), and it increased after treatment (p = 0.001) in RA patients. In addition, serum DUSP22 level positively related to synovium DUSP22 level in RA patients (r = 0.394, p = 0.010).

Conclusion

Synovium and serum DUSP22 are intercorrelated and insufficiently expressed in RA patients; meanwhile, their deficiency correlates with increased systemic inflammation, disease activity, and joint dysfunction.

Is There a Symmetry in Disease Control and Quality of Life of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Biological Therapy?

This study aims to analyze and compare the disease activity control and quality of life of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with biological products in real-life settings. We tried to determine whether there is a symmetry in the performance of the biological molecules between each other and with the first Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor. This is an observational, longitudinal, real-life study performed in the biggest rheumatology clinic during the period 2012–2020 comparing quality of life, cost of therapy, and disease control via different clinical measures. In all three disease activities measurement instruments, we observed an improvement for all biologic and target synthetic medicines. The disease activity score (DAS28) score decreased from 5.06 to 3.01, on average, for all INNs, suggesting that the majority of patients move away from moderate to low disease activity. The clinical disease activity index (CDAI) score decreased from 25.9 to 9.4, also indicating that patients with moderate disease activity reached a low level of activity. Similar results are reflected in the score, which fell from 27.7 to 10.3, again confirming the improvement to a low level of disease activity for patients treated with all INNs. Logically, with the successful control of disease activity, the quality of life (QoL) of the observed patients improved from 0.77 to 0.83 after a one-year follow up, as measured with the EuroQuol 5D-3L (EQ5D). Based on these results, we can consider that the observed biological INNs perform symmetrically in terms of the control of disease activity and improvement in the QoL of the observed patients. Biological therapy improves the disease control and quality of life of suitable patients with RA in real-life settings. All available biological therapies could be used interchangeably.

Serum IL-37 Level Is Associated with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Disease Activity: A Meta-Analysis

Interleukin-37 (IL-37) inhibits the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) via downregulating proinflammatory cytokines. Accordingly, we performed an analysis to accurately assess the relationship between serum IL-37 cytokine levels and disease activity of RA. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were applied to explore the sources of heterogeneity. Correlation coefficient (r) was utilized to evaluate the relationship between IL-37 and disease activity of RA patients. Ten studies were included into the research. Functional analysis revealed elevated serum IL-37 concentrations in RA patients (SMD = 1.61, P < 0.00001). The relationship between serum IL-37 levels and disease activity was statistically significant (C-reactive protein: r = 1.47, P = 0.0002; erythrocyte sedimentation rate: r = 1.55, P < 0.00001; rheumatoid factor: r = 1.40, P = 0.004; tumor necrosis factor⁃α: r = 1.64, P = 0.0003; Disease Activity Score for 28 joints: r = 1.63, P < 0.00001; tender joint count: r = 1.48, P < 0.00001; and swollen joint count: r = 1.52, P = 0.0003), but anti-CCP was not significant (anti-CCP: r = 0.98, P = 0.72). In summary, these data are suggesting that the elevated serum level of IL-37 in RA is positively correlated with the disease activity of RA, suggesting a role for IL-37in the pathogenesis of RA.

Cost-utility analysis of treatment options after initial tumor necrosis factor inhibitor therapy discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND: For patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who discontinued initial treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), 2 approaches are commonly used: cycling to another TNFi or switching to a drug with another mechanism of action. Currently, there is no consensus on which approach to use first. A report from the IBM MarketScan Research administrative claims database showed adalimumab (cycling strategy) and abatacept (switching strategy) were more commonly prescribed after the first TNFi discontinuation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-utility of adalimumab versus abatacept in patients with RA whose initial TNFi therapy failed. METHODS: A probabilistic cost-utility microsimulation state-transition model was used. Our target population was commercially insured adults with RA, the time horizon was 10 years, and we used a payer perspective. Patients not responding to adalimumab or abatacept were moved to the next drug in a sequence of 3 and, finally, to conventional synthetic therapy. Incremental cost-utility ratios (2016 USD per quality-adjusted-life-year gained [QALY)] were calculated. Utilities were derived from a formula based on the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and age-adjusted comorbidity score. RESULTS: Switching to abatacept after the first TNFi showed an incremental cost of just more than $11,300 over 10 years and achieved a QALY benefit of 0.16 compared with adalimumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $68,950 per QALY. Scenario analysis produced an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio range of $44,573 per QALY to $148,558 per QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that switching to abatacept after TNFi therapy failure had an 80.6% likelihood of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to abatacept is a cost-effective strategy for patients with RA whose discontinue initial therapy with TNFi. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this project was provided by a Rheumatology Research Foundation Investigator Award (principal investigator: Maria A. Lopez-Olivo). Karpes Matusevich's work was supported by a Doctoral Dissertation Research Award from the University of Texas, School of Public Health Office of Research. Lal reports competing interests outside of the submitted work (employed by Optum). Suarez-Almazor reports competing interests outside of the submitted work (consulting fees from Pfizer, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Agile Therapeutics, Amag Pharmaceuticals, and Gilead). Chan, Swint, and Cantor have nothing to disclose.

Factors Predicting Early Failure of Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Analysis From the Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulla Early Arthritis (Italian Group for the Study of Early Arthritis) Registry

Objectives

This study aims to investigate the factors associated with early discontinuation (within one year) of etanercept (ETA) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who began ETA as first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) and who were entered into the Gruppo Italiano di Studio sulla Early Arthritis (Italian Group for the Study of Early Arthritis; GISEA) registry.

Patients and methods

This registry-based cohort study included 477 RA patients (95 males, 382 females; median age 53 years; range 18 to 83 years) who began ETA as first bDMARD. Patient demographics, disease features and drugs were re-evaluated after 12 months. Baseline predictors of ETA discontinuation were estimated by univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox regression model.

Results

Seventy patients (14.7%) discontinued ETA during the first year (for inefficacy in 55.8%, adverse events in 28.6%, and other reasons in 6.5%). Concurrent conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) were reported in 54.3% of patients, mainly methotrexate (MTX), while 52.4% of subjects took low doses of glucocorticoids. Patients stopping ETA more frequently showed one or more comorbidities, mainly cardiovascular diseases (28.6% vs. 15.7% in patients stopping and continuing ETA, respectively, p=0.009). The presence of comorbidities and a combination therapy with csDMARDs other than MTX were independent factors associated with early discontinuation of ETA at multivariate Cox analysis.

Conclusion

Although ETA demonstrated a high persistence in biologic-naïve RA patients, about 15% of patients discontinued the treatment within 12 months. The presence of comorbidities and a combination therapy with csDMARDs other than MTX were the main factors for an early withdrawal of the drug.

Blood Lymphocyte Subsets for Early Identification of Non-Remission to TNF Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Background: TNF inhibitors (TNFis) are widely used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), although the response rates to this therapy in patients with RA remains heterogeneous and < 50% achieve remission (REM). Objective: To analyze baseline peripheral blood leukocytes profiles in order to search for biomarkers identifying patients who will most likely not achieve REM under TNFi treatment. Methods: A prospective bi-center pilot study including 98 RA patients treated with TNFis and followed-up during 6 months. Patients were classified according to DAS28 as follows: those who achieved REM (DAS28 ≤ 2.6) and those who did not (DAS28 > 2.6) at 6 months after starting TNFis. These rates were also assessed by simplified disease activity index (SDAI ≤ 3.3 and SDAI > 3.3, respectively). Peripheral blood immune cells were studied by flow cytometry before treatment initiation. Results: At 6 months, 61 or 80% of patients did not achieve REM by DAS28 or SDAI, respectively. Basal leukocyte profiles differed between REM vs. non-REM patients. Non-REM patients showed lower percentages of total and naïve B cells at baseline than REM subjects. A B lymphocyte/CD4+ lymphocyte ratio (BL/CD4 ratio) <0.2 clearly associated with a higher probability of non-REM status based on DAS28 at 6 months (OR = 9.2, p = 0.006). These data were confirmed when patient response was evaluated by SDAI index. Conclusion: Our results strongly suggest that BL/CD4 ratio could be considered as a useful biomarker for the early identification of non-remitters to TNFi in clinical practice.

Association study between KIR polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis disease: an updated meta-analysis

Background

Currently published studies investigating association between the killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) gene polymorphisms and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) reported inconsistent and contradictory results. Hence, we aim to carry out this comprehensive meta-analysis of all eligible studies meeting the inclusion criteria to achieve precise and comprehensive relationships between genetic variations in KIR gene cluster and risk of RA.

Methods

Databases of Medline/PubMed and Scopus were searched to investigate case-control studies prior to May 2018. The associations between KIR gene polymorphisms and RA susceptibility were analyzed by computing the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for each study.

Results

A total of 11 comparative case-control studies involving 1847 RA patients and 2409 healthy individuals were included in this meta-analysis. Four significant associations of 2DL3 (OR = 0.591, 95% CI = 0.351–0.994; P = 0.047), 2DL5 (OR = 0.716, 95% CI = 0.601–0.853; P < 0.001), 2DS5 (OR = 0.623, 95% CI = 0.393–0.988; P = 0.045), and 3DL3 (OR = 0.324, 95% CI = 0.129–0.814; P = 0.016) genes with decreased RA risk were discovered in this meta-analysis. Although, other KIR receptors including 2DL1, 2DL2, 2DL4, 3DL1, 3DL2, 3DS1, 2DS1-2DS4, and two pseudo gens of 2DP1 and 3DP1 displayed no significant association with predisposition to RA.

Conclusions

These findings provide reliable evidence that 2DL3, 2DL5, 3DL3, and 2DS5 might have a potential protective role for RA.

Cardiovascular dysfunction in sepsis at the dawn of emerging mediators

Subcellular dysfunction and impaired metabolism derived from the complex interaction of cytokines and mediators with cellular involvement are on the basis of the cardiovascular response to sepsis. The lethal consequences of an infection are intimately related to its ability to spread to other organ sites and the immune system of the host. About one century ago, William Osler (1849-1919), a Canadian physician, remarkably defined the sequelae of the host response in sepsis: "except on few occasions, the patient appears to die from the body's response to infection rather than from it." Cardiac dysfunction has received considerable attention to explain the heart failure in patients progressing from infection to sepsis, but our understanding of the processes remains limited. In fact, most concepts are linked to a mechanical concept of the sarcomeric structure, and physiological data seems to be often disconnected. Cytokines, prostanoids, and nitric oxide release are high direct impact factors, but coronary circulation and cardiomyocyte physiology also play a prominent role in modulating the effects of monocyte adhesion and infiltration. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) are involved in the host response. The identification of microRNAs, as well as the cyclic activation of the inflammatory cascade, has further added complexity to the scene. In this review, we delineate the current concepts of cellular dysfunction of the cardiomyocyte in the setting of sepsis and consider potential therapeutic strategies.