Associations Between Autonomic and Orthostatic Self-report and Physician Ratings of Orthostatic Intolerance in Youth

Recent research in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: an evidence map

Background

Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome is a chronic condition, classified by the World Health Organization as a nervous system disease, impacting around 17 million people worldwide. Presentation involves persistent fatigue and postexertional malaise (a worsening of symptoms after minimal exertion) and a wide range of other symptoms. Case definitions have historically varied; postexertional malaise is a core diagnostic criterion in current definitions. In 2022, a James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership established research priorities relating to myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.

Objective(s)

We created a map of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome evidence (2018-23), showing the volume and key characteristics of recent research in this field. We considered diagnostic criteria and how current research maps against the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership research priorities.

Methods

Using a predefined protocol, we conducted a comprehensive search of Cochrane, MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. We included all English-language research studies published between January 2018 and May 2023. Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria with consensus involving additional reviewers. Studies including people diagnosed with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome using any criteria (including self-report), of any age and in any setting were eligible. Studies with < 10 myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome participants were excluded. Data extraction, coding of topics (involving stakeholder consultation) and methodological quality assessment of systematic reviews (using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2) was conducted independently by two reviewers, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Studies were presented in an evidence map.

Results

Of the 11,278 identified studies, 742 met the selection criteria, but only 639 provided sufficient data for inclusion in the evidence map. These reported data from approximately 610,000 people with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. There were 81 systematic reviews, 72 experimental studies, 423 observational studies and 63 studies with other designs. Most studies (94%) were from high-income countries. Reporting of participant details was poor; 16% did not report gender, 74% did not report ethnicity and 81% did not report the severity of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome. Forty-four per cent of studies used multiple diagnostic criteria, 16% did not specify criteria, 24% used a single criterion not requiring postexertional malaise and 10% used a single criterion requiring postexertional malaise. Most (89%) systematic reviews had a low methodological quality. Five main topics (37 subtopics) were included in the evidence map. Of the 639 studies; 53% addressed the topic 'what is the cause?'; 38% 'what is the problem?'; 26% 'what can we do about it?'; 15% 'diagnosis and assessment'; and 13% other topics, including 'living with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome'.

Discussion

Studies have been presented in an interactive evidence map according to topic, study design, diagnostic criteria and age. This evidence map should inform decisions about future myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome research.

Limitations

An evidence map does not summarise what the evidence says. Our evidence map only includes studies published in 2018 or later and in English language. Inconsistent reporting and use of diagnostic criteria limit the interpretation of evidence. We assessed the methodological quality of systematic reviews, but not of primary studies.

Conclusions

We have produced an interactive evidence map, summarising myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome research from 2018 to 2023. This evidence map can inform strategic plans for future research. We found some, often limited, evidence addressing every James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership priority; high-quality systematic reviews should inform future studies.

Funding

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Evidence Synthesis programme as award number NIHR159926.

Assessment of autonomic symptom scales in patients with neurodevelopmental diagnoses using electronic health record data

Background

Sleep disturbances, gastrointestinal problems, and atypical heart rate are commonly observed in patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and may relate to underlying function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). The overall objective of the current study was to quantitatively characterize features of ANS function using symptom scales and available electronic health record (EHR) data in a clinically and genetically characterized pediatric cohort.

Methods

We assessed features of ANS function via chart review of patient records adapted from items drawn from a clinical research questionnaire of autonomic symptoms. This procedure coded for the presence and/or absence of targeted symptoms and was completed in 3 groups of patients, including patients with a clinical neurodevelopmental diagnosis and identified genetic etiology (NPD, n=244), those with an ASD diagnosis with no known genetic cause (ASD, n=159), and age and sex matched controls (MC, n=213). Symptoms were assessed across four main categories: (1) Mood, Behavior, and Emotion; (2) Secretomotor, Sensory Integration; (3) Urinary, Gastrointestinal, and Digestion; and (4) Circulation, Thermoregulation, Circadian function, and Sleep/Wake cycles.

Results

Chart review scores indicate an increased rate of autonomic symptoms across all four sections in our NPD group as compared to scores with ASD and/or MC. Additionally, we note several significant relationships between individual differences in autonomic symptoms and quantitative ASD traits.

Conclusion

These results highlight EHR review as a potentially useful method for quantifying variance in symptoms adapted from a questionnaire or survey. Further, using this method indicates that autonomic features are more prevalent in children with genetic disorders conferring risk for ASD and other neurodevelopmental diagnoses.

Cardiovascular Reaction to Orthostatic Test Among Non-functional Overreaching Athletes with Vegetative Disorders (The Physical Therapist Perspective)

Aim: The non-functional overreaching requires a deeper study because its diagnosing is not based on conventional methods. Orthostatic and clinostatic tests make it easy and quick to detect health problems. The purpose of this research is defining orthostatic reactions among 68 athletes with and without signs of non-functional overreaching. Materials and Methods: Our research comprises 2 groups of 68 athletes subdivided by presence of non-functional overreaching. The first group includes 27 persons with vegetative disorder signs. The second group covers 41 individuals without non-functional overreaching. For all of them, we conducted orthostatic tests to record blood pressure and heart rate horizontally and vertically. Results: The research showed that 9 athletes (33.3% of the O+ group) had unsatisfactory results after body tests in horizontal and vertical positions. All athletes revealed the orthostatic tolerance disorder. For 5 sportsmen, the latter was accompanied by the clinostatic overreaction. Resting heart rate did not vary considerably between both groups (р=0.412). However, orthostatic tests reflected the sharp index rise among 9 individuals. For non-functional overreaching athletes, the mean value (р<0.001) exceeded the corresponding one in the O- group more than twofold. Conclusions: Although today it is possible to differentiate orthostatic-clinostatic tolerance from vegetative dysfunction, further research must be conducted to clarify this syndrome types and to improve physical recovery for non-functional overreaching athletes.

The prevalence and impact of orthostatic intolerance in young women across the hypermobility spectrum

Orthostatic intolerance (OI) is frequently reported in young women with generalized hypermobility spectrum disorder (G-HSD) and hypermobile EDS (hEDS). However, it remains currently unclear whether OI is a comorbidity or fundamental part of the pathophysiology of G-HSD or hEDS. This study investigated the prevalence and impact of OI in young women across the hypermobility spectrum. Forty-five women (14-30 years, 15 controls, 15 G-HSD, and 15 hEDS) undertook a head-up tilt (HUT) and active stand test. Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) and Orthostatic Hypotension (OH) were assessed using age-related criteria. Autonomic dysfunction and quality-of-life questionnaires were also completed. The prevalence of POTS was higher in women with G-HSD than hEDS and control groups during HUT (43% vs. 7% and 7%, respectively, p < 0.05), but similar between groups during the active stand (47%, 27%, and 13% for G-HSD, hEDS, and control, respectively). No participants had OH. hEDS and G-HSD participants reported more severe orthostatic symptoms and poorer quality of life than controls. Although POTS was observed in hypermobile participants, there is no conclusive evidence that its prevalence differed between groups due to differences between the HUT and active stand assessments. Nevertheless, OI and broader autonomic dysfunction impacted on their quality of life.

Orthostatic intolerance and neurocognitive impairment in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)

Objectives

The Institute of Medicine (IOM 2015. Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness. Washington: The National Academies Press) suggested new criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), which requires an endorsement of either neurocognitive impairment or orthostatic intolerance (OI) in addition to other core symptoms. While some research supports the inclusion of OI as a core symptom, others argue that overlap with neurocognitive impairment does not justify the either/or option. The current study assessed methods of operationalizing OI using items from the DePaul Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ-1 and -2) as a part of the IOM criteria. Evaluating the relationship between OI and neurocognitive symptoms may lead to a better understanding of diagnostic criteria for ME/CFS.

Methods

Two-hundred and forty-two participants completed the DSQ. We examined how many participants met the IOM criteria while endorsing different frequencies and severities of various OI symptoms.

Results

Neurocognitive impairment was reported by 93.4% of respondents. OI without concurrent neurocognitive symptoms only allowed for an additional 1.7-4.5% of participants to meet IOM criteria.

Conclusions

Neurocognitive symptoms and OI overlap in ME/CFS, and our results do not support the IOM's inclusion of neurocognitive impairment and OI as interchangeable symptoms. Furthermore, our findings highlight the need for a uniform method of defining and measuring OI via self-report in order to accurately study OI as a symptom of ME/CFS.