Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Cutaneous Melanoma

Deep learning model shows pathologist-level detection of sentinel node metastasis of melanoma and intra-nodal nevi on whole slide images

Introduction

Nodal metastasis (NM) in sentinel node biopsies (SNB) is crucial for melanoma staging. However, an intra-nodal nevus (INN) may often be misclassified as NM, leading to potential misdiagnosis and incorrect staging. There is high discordance among pathologists in assessing SNB positivity, which may lead to false staging. Digital whole slide imaging offers the potential for implementing artificial intelligence (AI) in digital pathology. In this study, we assessed the capability of AI to detect NM and INN in SNBs.

Methods

A total of 485 hematoxylin and eosin whole slide images (WSIs), including NM and INN from 196 SNBs, were collected and divided into training (279 WSIs), validation (89 WSIs), and test sets (117 WSIs). A deep learning model was trained with 5,956 manual pixel-wise annotations. The AI and three blinded dermatopathologists assessed the test set, with immunohistochemistry serving as the reference standard.

Results

The AI model showed excellent performance with an area under the curve receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.965 for detecting NM. In comparison, the AUC for NM detection among dermatopathologists ranged between 0.94 and 0.98. For the detection of INN, the AUC was lower for both AI (0.781) and dermatopathologists (range of 0.63-0.79).

Discussion

In conclusion, the deep learning AI model showed excellent accuracy in detecting NM, achieving dermatopathologist-level performance in detecting both NM and INN. Importantly, the AI model showed the potential to differentiate between these two entities. However, further validation is warranted.

Variability of Sentinel Lymph Node Location in Patients with Trunk Melanoma

(1) Background: Melanoma is one of the most aggressive types of neoplasia, and the management of this pathology requires a correct staging, as well as a personalized modern oncological treatment. The main objective of the study is to determine the variability of the lymphatic drainage for patients with melanomas located on the trunk and, secondarily, to determine the features of individuals who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) depending on the exact location on the trunk. (2) Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study included 62 cases of trunk melanoma operated between July 2019 and March 2023, in which SLNB was performed and a total of 84 lymph nodes were excised. (3) Results: Patients had a median age of 54.5 (33-78) years, with 58.1% being male; the melanomas had a median Breslow index of 2.3 (0.5-12.5) mm. Approximately 64.3% of the cohort had melanoma on the upper part of the trunk (54 cases) and 35.7% had it on the lower part (30 cases). The type of anesthesia chosen was general anesthesia in 53 cases and spinal anesthesia in 9 cases (85.5% vs. 14.5%, p < 0.001). The number of sentinel lymph nodes excised was 54 for melanomas located on the upper part of the trunk (8 cervical and 46 axillary) and 30 sentinel lymph nodes for melanomas of the lower part of the trunk (16 at the axillary level and 14 at the inguinal level). Out of the 54 LNs identified in patients with melanoma on the upper part of the trunk, 13 were positive, with a total of 12 positive lymph nodes (LNs) from the axillar basin, and only one from the cervical region. Additionally, the incidence of patients with a minimum of two identified sentinel lymph nodes was 32.2%, with a total of seven having LN involvement in two basins, and only one of these cases showed positivity for malignancy. (4) Conclusions: SLNBs were more frequent in the axillary region overall, and had more positive SLNs. Moreover, melanoma on the upper part of the trunk had a higher rate of positive SLNs compared to the lower part. Tumors located on the lower part of the truck had more positive SLNs in the axillary region than in the inguinal one.

Actualities in the Morphology and Immunohistochemistry of Cutaneous and Ocular Melanoma: What Lies Ahead? A Single-Centre Study

Melanoma is the most aggressive melanocytic tumor whose incidence is continuously increasing worldwide.

METHODS

We highlight the morphological, immunohistochemistry, and particularities of various melanoma types based on the cases diagnosed in our department from 2017 to 2021.

RESULTS

We present 100 melanoma cases and one capsular nevus case. The most common type was nodular melanoma. The immunohistochemistry markers used were SRY-box transcription factor 10 (SOX10), S100 protein, human melanoma black 45 (HMB45), and melanoma antigen recognized by T cells 1 (Melan-A). Uveal melanoma and conjunctival melanoma represent particular tumors with independent prognostic factors. Uveal melanoma requires assessment of macrophages, microvascularisation, and mitoses. Sentinel lymph node metastases are essential targets that provide staging tools. Conjunctival melanoma and capsular nevi are diagnostic pitfalls.

CONCLUSION

Melanoma can appear in various forms, and sometimes the diagnosis might be unclear. Today, immunohistochemistry remains the most important tool in confirming the diagnosis and prognosis for this type of neoplasia.

Comparison of Two Rapid Assays for the Detection of BRAF V600 Mutations in Metastatic Melanoma including Positive Sentinel Lymph Nodes

Testing for the BRAF mutation is mandatory for the management of patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma. Molecular analysis based on DNA sequencing remains the gold-standard method for the screening of the different BRAF mutations. These methods must be rapid, sensitive, and specific enough to allow optimal therapeutic management in daily practice and also to include patients in clinical trials. Here, we compared the Idylla BRAF Mutation Test and the anti-BRAF V600E (clone VE1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 90 melanoma samples, with a focus on a challenging cohort of 32 positive sentinel lymph nodes. The BRAF status was assessed with both methods independently of the percentage of tumor cells. The concordance rate was calculated excluding both non-contributory analyses and BRAFV600K/R/M mutants due to the specific V600E-IHC test design. The incidence of the BRAFV600E mutation was 33% with both BRAF Idylla and BRAF IHC. The agreement rate was 91% (72/79). Although the agreement rate was high, we suggest that the use of IHC is more suitable for rapid BRAF testing on sentinel lymph node biopsies when associated with a low percentage and scattered tumor cells, which gave a high risk of non-contributory analysis and/or false negative results with the Idylla^TMBRAF Mutation Test.

Three Types of Nodal Melanocytic Nevi in Sentinel Lymph Nodes of Patients With Melanoma: Pitfalls, Immunohistochemistry, and a Review of the Literature

The presence or absence of metastasis in sentinel lymph nodes often drives melanoma staging, prognosis, and treatment. However, distinguishing between metastatic melanoma cells and clusters of benign melanocytic nevus cells is not always straightforward. When morphologic hematoxylin and eosin interpretation alone is not sufficient, additional hematoxylin and eosin sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) studies may be beneficial. This review and small cases series of 3 diagnostically challenging melanocytic sentinel lymph node cases highlights the IHC approach to evaluate intraparenchymal nodal melanocytic nevi, coexistent metastatic melanoma with adjacent melanocytic nevi cells, and nodal blue nevi. In challenging cases, cytological morphology of the melanocytes, location within the lymph node, and IHC studies may assist in diagnosis. If these tools yield conflicting results, expert opinion is recommended.

CD63 expression in metastatic melanoma and melanocytic nevi in lymph nodes

Lymph node status remains one of the most important determinants for prognosis in patients with invasive malignant melanoma. Immunohistochemical stains are routinely employed in the histopathologic evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes removed for staging in patients with melanoma. Histologic analysis may reveal the presence of incidental benign melanocytic nevus cell inclusions (BMNCI), which are critical to distinguish from metastatic melanoma (MM). Our study assesses the utility of NK1 C3 (CD63) immunohistochemical staining in distinguishing between MM and BMNCI in sentinel lymph nodes. We found no difference in staining of MM and BMNCI, precluding its usefulness in differentiating between benign and malignant melanocytes. Thus CD63 lacks specificity when facing challenging cases requiring distinction between benign and malignant melanocytic cells; however, in combination with other immunohistochemical antibodies, CD63 may be useful in supporting melanocytic differentiation. Distinguishing MM and BMNCI continues to be a diagnostic challenge at times. Further research is needed to identify potentially useful markers to provide better diagnostic utility when evaluating lymph node biopsies in patients with melanoma.

Lymph Liquid Biopsy for Detection of Cancer Stem Cells

Collection of a blood sample defined by the term "blood liquid biopsy" is commonly used to detect diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic decision-making markers of metastatic tumors including circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Many tumors also release CTCs and other markers into lymph fluid, but the utility of lymphatic markers largely remains unexplored. Here, we introduce lymph liquid biopsy through collection of peripheral (afferent) and central (thoracic duct [TD]) lymph samples and demonstrates its feasibility for detection of stem-like CTCs potentially responsible for metastasis development and tumor relapse. Stemness of lymphatic CTCs (L-CTCs) was determined by spheroid-forming assay in vitro. Simultaneously, we tested blood CTCs by conventional blood liquid biopsy, and monitored the primary tumor size, early metastasis in a sentinel lymph node (SLN) and distant metastasis in lungs. Using a mouse model at early melanoma stage with no distant metastasis, we identified stem-like L-CTCs in lymph samples from afferent lymphatic vessels. Since these vessels transport cells from the primary tumor to SLN, our finding emphasizes the significance of the lymphatic pathway in development of SLN metastasis. Surprisingly, in pre-metastatic disease, stem-like L-CTCs were detected in lymph samples from the TD, which directly empties lymph into blood circulation. This suggests a new contribution of the lymphatic system to initiation of distant metastasis. Integration of lymph and blood liquid biopsies demonstrated that all mice with early melanoma had stem-like CTCs in at least one of three samples (afferent lymph, TD lymph, and blood). At the stage of distant metastasis, spheroid-forming L-CTCs were detected in TD lymph, but not in afferent lymph. Altogether, our results demonstrated that lymph liquid biopsy and testing L-CTCs holds promise for diagnosis and prognosis of early metastasis. © 2020 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Clinical significance of SLN benign capsular nevi in patients with melanoma

BACKGROUND

Benign capsular nevi (BCN) are not infrequent in sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) of patients with melanoma. Their prognostic significance is unknown and the literature is limited. This study evaluated the clinical significance of incidentally found BCN in these patients.

METHODS

A multi-institutional retrospective review of patients undergoing SLN biopsy for cutaneous melanoma between 2000 and 2016. Patients were divided into the following groups: (a) negative SLN and no BCN, (b) negative SLN and presence of BCN, (c) positive SLN seen only on immunohistochemistry (IHC), and (d) positive SLN via hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Outcomes measured were overall survival and any recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 1253 patients were identified (group 1 = 978, group 2 = 56, group 3 = 32, and group 4 = 187). Fifty-seven percent were male and the mean age was 59.3 years. BCN was identified in 77 patients (6.2%), of which the majority was in the node-negative group (72%). Multivariable analysis showed that BCN was associated with lower recurrence rates, though not statistically significant (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.5; P = .06). IHC- and H&E-positive SLNs were associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR = 2.4; P = .02 and 2.0, P < .0001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with BCN and negative SLN had lower recurrence rates than patients with negative SLN and no BCN. Our data suggest a possible protective effect against recurrence.

Correlation of Tumor Burden in Sentinel Lymph Nodes with Tumor Burden in Nonsentinel Lymph Nodes and Survival in Cutaneous Melanoma

PURPOSE

In patients with cutaneous melanoma, metastasis in a nonsentinel lymph node (non-SLN) is a strong independent adverse prognostic factor. However, patients with a tumor-involved SLN no longer routinely undergo completion lymph node dissection (CLND). We hypothesized that SLN tumor burden may predict non-SLN tumor burden.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We compared tumor burden parameters between SLN and non-SLN in patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLN biopsy with a positive SLN during 2003 to 2008 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

RESULTS

We identified 336 eligible patients with a positive SLN. Of these, 308 (92%) underwent CLND, and 35 (10%) had non-SLN metastasis. The median follow-up time was 6.0 years. For patients with maximum diameter of tumor in the SLN ≤2.0 mm, >2.0-5.0 mm, and >5.0 mm, non-SLN metastasis was detected in 5 of 200 patients (3%), 10 of 63 patients (16%), and 20 of 57 patients (35%), and the mean maximum diameters of the non-SLN tumor deposits were 0.09, 1.56, and 2.71 mm, respectively (P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients with both subcapsular and intraparenchymal non-SLN tumor was higher for patients with SLN tumor in both locations than for patients with SLN tumor in only one location (P < 0.0001). Extranodal extension in a non-SLN was more common in patients with extranodal extension in an SLN (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cutaneous melanoma who undergo CLND, SLN tumor burden predicts non-SLN tumor burden. SLN tumor burden parameters provide accurate prognostic stratification independent of non-SLN status and should be considered for incorporation into future staging systems and integrated risk models.

Diagnostic utility of dual 5-hydroxymethylcytosine/Melan-A immunohistochemistry in differentiating nodal nevus from metastatic melanoma: An effective first-line test for the workup of sentinel lymph node specimen

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing benign nodal nevus from metastatic melanoma can be diagnostically challenging, with important clinical consequences. Recently, the loss of epigenetic marker, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC) expression by immunohistochemistry has been found in melanomas and atypical melanocytic neoplasms.

METHODS

About 41 metastatic melanomas and 20 nodal nevi were retrieved. Nuclear 5-hmC (brown) and cytoplasmic Melan-A Red (red) double immunohistochemical staining was performed.

RESULTS

Total or partial loss of nuclear expression of 5-hmC was noted in 40/41 metastatic melanomas; these tumor cells were strongly positive for Melan-A Red, except in one case of desmoplastic melanoma. All cases of nodal nevus showed uniformly retained nuclear expression of 5-hmC accompanied by strong Melan-A Red cytoplasmic staining. In two cases containing both nodal nevus and metastatic melanoma, all tumor cells were positive for Melan-A Red, but a nuclear expression of 5-hmC was selectively absent only in the melanoma tumor cells.

CONCLUSION

Dual 5-hmC/Melan-A Red immunohistochemistry is highly specific in distinguishing nodal nevus from metastatic melanoma. Our protocol for brown and red chromogens used in this study provides excellent color contrast and is easy to interpret. Furthermore, this dual staining method allows the preservation of limited tumor tissue, which could be used for potential molecular studies.