1
|
Khouri IF, Alzahrani K, Kantarjian H, Milton DR, Gulbis AM, Sasaki K, Jain N, Short NJ, Kadia T, Daher M, Rafei H, Im JS, Marin D, Olson AL, Popat U, Qazilbash M, Ramdial J, Rondon G, Srour S, Kebriaei P, Shpall E, Champlin R, Jabbour EJ. Safety and long-term survival results of the addition of inotuzumab ozogamicin to the conditioning regimen of allogeneic stem cell transplantation: A single-center phase 1,2 trial. Am J Hematol 2024; 99:836-843. [PMID: 38400519 PMCID: PMC11001510 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Here we report on the first prospective study evaluating the safety and long-term survival when an escalating dose of inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) (0.6, 1.2, or 1.8 mg/m2 on day 13) was added to one alkylator-containing conditioning regimen in patients with relapsed CD22 (+) lymphoid malignancies who were candidates for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Twenty-six patients were enrolled. Six (23%) of these patients entered the phase 1 study: four were treated at an INO dose of 0.6 mg/m2 and two at dose of 1.2 mg/m2. None of these patients experienced dose-limiting toxicities. The remaining 20 (77%) patients entered the phase 2 part of the study at the maximum dose of 1.8 mg/m2. One patient developed VOD; this patient had received nivolumab immediately before HSCT while simultaneously experiencing hyperacute graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) at 5 years was 12%. With a median follow-up of 48.7 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 84% and 80%, respectively. Compared with a historical cohort who received same conditioning for HSCT but without INO (n = 56), the INO group showed no significant differences in incidence of liver toxicity, engraftment time, TRM, or risk of acute GVHD. Patients with lymphoma who received INO had a trend for a better 5-year OS (93% versus 68%) and PFS (93% versus 58%) than those in the control group. In conclusion, our results showed that INO is safe with no increased risk of VOD when combined with one alkylator-containing regimen of HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issa F. Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Kamal Alzahrani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hagop Kantarjian
- Department of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Denái R. Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alison M. Gulbis
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Koji Sasaki
- Department of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nitin Jain
- Department of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Nicholas J. Short
- Department of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Tapan Kadia
- Department of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - May Daher
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hind Rafei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jin S. Im
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David Marin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Amanda L. Olson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Muzaffar Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Richard Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elias J. Jabbour
- Department of Leukemia, the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cho WC, Saade R, Nagarajan P, Aung PP, Milton DR, Marques-Piubelli ML, Hudgens C, Ledesma D, Nelson K, Ivan D, Zhang M, Torres-Cabala CA, Campbell M, Alhalabi O, Prieto VG, Wistuba II, Esmaeli B, Curry JL. Nectin-4 expression in a subset of cutaneous adnexal carcinomas: A potential target for therapy with enfortumab vedotin. J Cutan Pathol 2024; 51:360-367. [PMID: 38200650 DOI: 10.1111/cup.14579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate directed against Nectin-4 that is used to treat urothelial carcinoma. Nectin-4 is inherently expressed in the skin and adnexal structures. Since therapeutic options for cutaneous adnexal carcinomas are limited, we sought to evaluate Nectin-4 expression in adnexal carcinomas and benign adnexal neoplasms to identify tumors that are potentially targetable with EV. METHODS Eight sebaceous carcinomas (seven periocular and one lymph node metastasis), eight digital papillary adenocarcinomas, seven squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas, eight poromas, eight trichilemmomas, and seven sebaceous adenomas were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for anti-Nectin-4 antibody. H-scores for Nectin-4 expression were calculated. RESULTS Benign adnexal neoplasms had a significantly lower mean (±SD) Nectin-4 H-score (142.6 ± 39.1) than did the adnexal carcinomas (198 ± 90.8; p = 0.006). Nectin-4 was expressed in 91% (21/23) of adnexal carcinomas. Sebaceous carcinomas frequently exhibited high expression of Nectin-4 (88% [7/8]), with a mean (±SD) H-score (258.1 ± 58.4) significantly higher than those for digital papillary adenocarcinomas (197.5 ± 52.5; p = 0.035) and squamoid eccrine ductal carcinomas (131.4 ± 114.1; p = 0.031). Sebaceous carcinomas also had significantly higher H-scores than did sebaceous adenomas (186.4 ± 25.0; p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS Increased Nectin-4 expression in a subset of cutaneous adnexal carcinomas, particularly sebaceous carcinomas, reveals that EV is a potential therapeutic option for these tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Cheal Cho
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rayan Saade
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priyadharsini Nagarajan
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Phyu P Aung
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mario L Marques-Piubelli
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Courtney Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Debora Ledesma
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly Nelson
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Doina Ivan
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Miao Zhang
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Matthew Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Omar Alhalabi
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bita Esmaeli
- Orbital Oncology & Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Akkoc Mustafayev FN, Shukla MA, Lanier A, Milton DR, Gutierrez AM, Gruschkus SK, Lewis JE, Murthy RK, Arun BK. Survival outcomes of patients with HER2/neu-positive breast cancer with germline BRCA mutations. Cancer 2024; 130:1600-1608. [PMID: 38100492 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and their association with triple-negative BC has been thoroughly investigated. However, some carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations have human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu)-positive BC, which has a different targeted therapy approach, and data are scarce for this patient population. The authors sought to characterize the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with HER2/neu-positive BC who had germline BRCA1/2 mutations. METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of data from 1099 patients diagnosed with HER2/neu-positive BC who were screened for germline BRCA mutations between 1996 and 2022. Clinicopathologic features and survival rates were analyzed by BRCA mutation status. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to analyze the association between clinical variables and outcomes. RESULTS Of 1099 patients with HER2/neu-positive BC, 73 (6.6%) tested positive for BRCA1/2 mutations. Age, race, and tumor characteristics did not differ between BRCA noncarriers and carriers. At a median follow-up of 78.6 months, the 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was 85% in BRCA carriers and 87% in noncarriers (p = .79), and the 5-year overall survival rate was 94% in BRCA carriers and 94% in noncarriers (p = .78). In a multivariable model, BRCA was not associated with recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-1.90; p = .96) or overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.33-2.07; p = .69). CONCLUSIONS BRCA1/2 mutations occurred in 6.6% of patients with HER2/neu-positive BC and did not affect survival outcomes. Assessing the potential benefits of new treatment strategies, such as combining anti-HER2/neu therapies with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, may lead to enhanced outcomes for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mihir Amitabh Shukla
- Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Amanda Lanier
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Angelica M Gutierrez
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen K Gruschkus
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John E Lewis
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Rashmi K Murthy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Banu K Arun
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alzahrani K, Pasvolsky O, Wang Z, Milton DR, Tanner MR, Bashir Q, Srour S, Saini N, Lin P, Ramdial J, Nieto Y, Lee HC, Patel KK, Manasanch EE, Kebriaei P, Thomas SK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Shpall EJ, Champlin R, Qazilbash MH. Impact of revised International Staging System 2 risk stratification on outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma receiving autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 2024. [PMID: 38448009 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.19384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
The second revision of the International Staging System (R2-ISS) is a simple tool to risk-stratify newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Here, we completed a retrospective analysis to evaluate the utility of R2-ISS in NDMM patients who underwent up-front autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT). A total of 1291 patients were included, with a median age of 62 years (range 29-83). The distribution of R2-ISS stages was: 123 (10%) stage I, 471 (36%) stage II, 566 (44%) stage III and 131 (10%) stage IV. With a median follow-up of 42.2 months (range 0.3-181.0), the median PFS was 73.0, 65.2, 44.0 and 24.8 months, (p < 0.001) and the median OS was 130.8, 128.5, 94.2 and 61.4 months (p < 0.001) for patients with R2-ISS stages I, II, III and IV respectively. On multivariable analysis (MVA) for PFS, using R2-ISS stage I as reference, R2-ISS stages III (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.55 [1.05-2.29]; p = 0.028) and IV (2.04 [1.24-3.36]; p = 0.005) were associated with significantly inferior PFS. In the MVA of OS, using R2-ISS stage I as reference, only R2-ISS stage IV was associated with significantly inferior OS (2.43 [1.18-5.01]; p = 0.017). Overall, we found that R2-ISS is a reliable prognostic tool for NDMM patients undergoing up-front auto-HCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal Alzahrani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Adult Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplant, King Fahad Medical City (KFMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Oren Pasvolsky
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Zhongya Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mark R Tanner
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Paul Lin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Krina K Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elisabet E Manasanch
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sheeba K Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Donna M Weber
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Richard Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Malek AE, Al-Juhaishi T, Milton DR, Ramdial JL, Daher M, Olson AL, Srour SA, Alatrash G, Oran B, Mehta RS, Khouri IF, Bashir Q, Shah N, Ciurea SO, Rondon G, Maadani F, Hosing C, Marin D, Kebriaei P, Rezvani K, Nieto Y, Anderlini P, Alousi AM, Faisal MS, Qazilbash MH, Popat UR, Champlin RE, Shpall EJ, Mulanovich VE, Ahmed S. Outcomes of toxoplasmosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the role of antimicrobial prophylaxis. Bone Marrow Transplant 2024:10.1038/s41409-024-02238-x. [PMID: 38355908 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-024-02238-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/16/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre E Malek
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine- Division of Infectious Diseases, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Taha Al-Juhaishi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- OU Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Department of Medicine-Section of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeremy L Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - May Daher
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amanda L Olson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samer A Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gheath Alatrash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rohtesh S Mehta
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Issa F Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nina Shah
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stefan O Ciurea
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Farzaneh Maadani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Marin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katayoun Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paolo Anderlini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amin M Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Muhammad Salman Faisal
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Victor E Mulanovich
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control, and Employee Health, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yalniz FF, Greenbaum U, Pasvolsky O, Milton DR, Kanagal-Shamanna R, Ramdial J, Srour S, Mehta R, Alousi A, Popat UR, Nieto Y, Kebriaei P, Al-Atrash G, Oran B, Hosing C, Ahmed S, Champlin RE, Shpall EJ, Qazilbash MH, Bashir Q. Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Multiple Myeloma Who Developed Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Autologous Cell Transplantation. Transplant Cell Ther 2024; 30:205.e1-205.e12. [PMID: 37437764 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who undergo high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (Auto-HCT) have an increased risk of developing therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia (t-MDS/AML). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all MM patients who underwent an Auto-HCT at our institution between 1 January and 31 December 2018 and later developed t-MDS/AML. Among the 2982 patients who underwent at least 1 Auto-HCT, 55 (2%) developed t-MDS/AML (MDS, n = 52; AML, n = 3). The median age at t-MDS/AML diagnosis was 66 years (range 43-83 years), and the median time from Auto-HCT to t-MDS/AML diagnosis was 58.5 months (range 6-206 months). At diagnosis, all 3 patients with tAML and 65% of those with therapy-related myelodysplastic syndrome (tMDS) had high-risk disease, per 2022 European LeukemiaNet and R-IPSS, respectively, and 62% had TP53 gene mutations. Patients who developed tMDS/AML were older at MM diagnosis (median 61 versus 59 years; P = .06), more often were male (73% versus 58%; P = .029), received more than 2 years of lenalidomide maintenance (57% versus 39%; P = .014), and experienced complete remission more frequently after Auto-HCT compared to those who did not develop t-MDS/AML (56% versus 40%; P = .012). In a multivariable model, male gender, advanced age at MM diagnosis, experiencing complete remission after Auto-HCT, and lenalidomide maintenance were independent predictors of developing t-MDS/AML. Among the patients who developed t-MDS/AML, 14 (25%) underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem transplantation (Allo-HCT). After a median follow-up of 9.9 months from t-MDS/AML diagnosis, the median overall survival (OS) after t-MDS/AML diagnosis was 11.8 months for all patients, and 18.2 months versus 11.1 months for Allo-HCT recipients versus nonrecipients, respectively (P = .25). On univariate analysis, receiving an alkylator as induction for MM (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 2.9 [1.3-6.3]; P = .009), age > 60 years (3.1 [1.2-8.2]; P = .025), and higher-risk R-IPSS (2.7 [1.3-6.0]; P=0.011) predicted worse OS after t-MDS/AML diagnosis. None of these retained significance in the multivariable analysis. T-MDS/AML after Auto-HCT for MM is associated with aggressive disease characteristics, including high-risk cytogenetics and TP53 mutations. The outcomes of patients remain poor, even with Allo-HCT. A better understanding of disease biology and novel therapeutic approaches is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fevzi F Yalniz
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uri Greenbaum
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Oren Pasvolsky
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rashmi Kanagal-Shamanna
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rohtesh Mehta
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amin Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gheath Al-Atrash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pasvolsky O, Ghanem S, Milton DR, Rauf M, Tanner MR, Bashir Q, Srour S, Saini N, Lin P, Ramdial J, Nieto Y, Tang G, Aljawai Y, Khan HN, Kebriaei P, Lee HC, Patel KK, Thomas SK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma and 1q gain/amplification receiving autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant: the MD Anderson cancer center experience. Blood Cancer J 2024; 14:4. [PMID: 38199987 PMCID: PMC10781953 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00973-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
The prognostic impact of additional copies of chromosome 1q (1q + ) on outcomes of newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients undergoing autologous transplantation (autoSCT) is unclear. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of NDMM patients with 1q21 gain/amplification (3 or ≥4 copies of 1q, respectively) that received autoSCT between 2008-2018. 213 patients were included (79% 1q gain; 21% 1q amplification). The most commonly used induction regimen was bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (41%). At day100 post-autoSCT and at best post-transplant response, 78% and 87% of patients achieved ≥VGPR, and 38% and 50% achieved MRD-negative ≥VGPR, respectively. Median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 35.5 months and 81.4 months, respectively. On multivariable assessment for PFS, MRD negative ≥VGPR before autoSCT (HR 0.52, p = 0.013) was associated with superior PFS, whereas 1q amplification was associated with inferior PFS (2.03, p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis for OS, achieving MRD negative ≥VGPR at best post-transplant response was associated with superior survival (0.29, p < 0.001), whereas R-ISS III and concomitant del17p or t(4:14) were associated with inferior survival (6.95, p = 0.030, 2.33, p = 0.023 and 3.00, p = 0.047, respectively). In conclusion, patients with 1q+ NDMM, especially 1q amplification, have inferior survival outcomes compared to standard-risk disease after upfront autoSCT, though outcomes are better than other high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Pasvolsky
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sassine Ghanem
- Lifespan Cancer Institute, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mikael Rauf
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark R Tanner
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Lin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guilin Tang
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yosra Aljawai
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hina N Khan
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Krina K Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sheeba K Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Donna M Weber
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Joseph J, Srour SA, Milton DR, Ramdial JL, Saini NY, Olson AL, Bashir Q, Oran B, Alousi AM, Hosing C, Qazilbash MH, Kebriaei P, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Popat UR. Transplantation Outcomes of Myelofibrosis with Busulfan and Fludarabine Myeloablative Conditioning. Transplant Cell Ther 2023; 29:770.e1-770.e6. [PMID: 37742746 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Outcomes of myelofibrosis (MF) with allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) have improved over the past decade, related in part to advances in supportive treatments and conditioning regimens. Several factors are known to predict transplantation outcomes. However, most studies lack homogeneity in conditioning regimens used, limiting their ability to assess prognostic factors on transplantation outcomes. We aimed to identify the risk factors that predict transplantation outcomes in patients with MF who underwent matched or mismatched allo-SCT using a uniform myeloablative conditioning regimen consisting of busulfan and fludarabine with tacrolimus and methotrexate-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. This single-center study included patients with MF who underwent allo-SCT with a matched unrelated donor (MUD), matched related donor (MRD), or mismatched unrelated donor (MMUD) and received busulfan and fludarabine conditioning with methotrexate/tacrolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis. Sixty-five patients with MF met the study criteria and were included in our analysis. At a median follow-up of 35.6 months, the 3-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and overall survival (OS) for all study patients were 27%, 20%, and 65%, respectively. In a multivariable analysis for CIR, prior use of JAK inhibitors was significantly associated with a decreased risk of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], .33; 95% confidence interval [CI], .11 to .99; P = .048). For NRM, Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Comorbidity Index (≥3 versus <3; HR, 10.09; 95% CI, 2.09 to 48.76; P = .004) and donor type (MUD versus MRD: HR, 5.38; 95% CI, 1.14 to 25.30; P = .033; MMUD versus MRD: HR, 10.73; 95% CI, 1.05 to 109.4; P = .045) were associated with an increased risk of mortality. Likewise for OS, HCT-CI (≥3 versus <3; HR, 3.31; 95% CI, 1.22 to 8.99; P = .019) and donor type (MMUD versus MRD: HR, 5.20; 95% CI, 1.35 to 19.98; P = .016) were significantly associated with inferior survival. Longer time from diagnosis to allo-SCT seemed to confer worse survival, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (>12 months versus ≤12 months: NRM: HR, 7.20; 95% CI, .96 to 53.94; P = .055; OS: HR, 2.60; 95% CI, .95 to 7.14; P = .06). In a homogenous cohort of MF patients uniformly treated with busulfan/fludarabine myeloablative conditioning and methotrexate-based GVHD prophylaxis, we show that donor choice and HCT-CI are the 2 strongest predictors for improved survival after allo-SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacinth Joseph
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer A Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeremy L Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeraj Y Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda L Olson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amin M Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pasvolsky O, Ghanem S, Milton DR, Masood A, Tanner MR, Bashir Q, Srour S, Saini N, Lin P, Ramdial J, Nieto Y, Lee HC, Patel KK, Kebriaei P, Thomas SK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Ultra-High-Risk Multiple Myeloma. Transplant Cell Ther 2023; 29:757-762. [PMID: 37673125 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities have inferior survival outcomes and are underrepresented in clinical trials. There is scarce data on MM patients with more than one high-risk cytogenetic aberration (ie, ultra- high-risk MM). This study was conducted to evaluate outcomes of newly diagnosed MM patients with ultra-high-risk MM who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT). We conducted a retrospective single-center chart review analysis of adult patients with ultra-high-risk MM who underwent autoHCT between 2008 and 2018 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. High-risk cytogenetics were defined as del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), or 1q21 gain or amplification (1q+) by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Seventy-nine patients with two or more high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were included in our analysis. The median age of 61 years (range, 33.5 to 76.5 years), and 57% were female. Sixty-seven patients had two high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities, and 12 patients had three high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities. The most common combinations of high-risk abnormalities were [1q+, t(4:14)] (n = 25; 32%) and [1q+, del17p] (n = 21; 27%). The majority of patients received either bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (48%) or carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (16%) as induction therapy. Prior to autoHCT, 52 patients (66%) achieved a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR), whereas 23 patients (29%) achieved minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative ≥VGPR. Fifty-six patients (71%) received post-transplantation maintenance therapy. Thirty-six patients (46%) achieved MRD-negative ≥VGPR at day +100 after autoHCT, and 40 patients (51%) did so at best post-transplantation response. With a median follow-up in surviving patients of 38.3 months (range, 11.9 to 104.8 months), the median PFS and OS in the entire cohort were 22.9 months and 71.5 months, respectively. For the subset of patients with three HR abnormalities, the median PFS was 15.6 months and median OS was 28.0 months. In multivariate analysis, achieving MRD-negative ≥VGPR prior to autoHCT was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR], .42; P = .045), whereas male sex (HR, .15; P = .009) and achieving MRD-negative ≥VGPR post-autoHCT (HR, .27; P = .026) were associated with improved OS. In conclusion, patients with ultra-high-risk MM have a median PFS of <24 months with the current standard of care that includes consolidation with autoHCT. These patients may benefit from earlier use of newer treatment modalities, such as chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and bispecific antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Pasvolsky
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Sassine Ghanem
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adeel Masood
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mark R Tanner
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul Lin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina K Patel
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sheeba K Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Donna M Weber
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kwon D, Taherian M, Milton DR, Iaeger P, Chin K, Aung PP. The Secret Life of Junior Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023:496482. [PMID: 37852170 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0195-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Transition from pathology trainee to independent pathologist is stressful. No study has examined junior pathologists' challenges and concerns during this transition. OBJECTIVE.— To identify challenges and concerns of junior pathologists. DESIGN.— Junior pathologists were defined as those who had been practicing independently for up to 5 years after completion of residency/fellowship. An institutional review board-approved electronic survey was created and distributed to recent pathology graduates of MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, Texas) and MedStar Georgetown University Hospital (Washington, District of Columbia). The survey was open from October 13, 2022, to January 31, 2023. The survey included 16 multiple-choice and free-text questions. RESULTS.— Responses were received from 39 junior pathologists. Participants working in academic settings indicated independence, work-life balance, and professional identity formation as challenges; those in nonacademic settings indicated pathology reporting, efficiency, and administration as challenges. Areas where participants wished they received more guidance differed by practice setting: participants in academic settings more often chose effective time management and importance of turnaround time (35% [7 of 20] versus 0% [0 of 14], P = .03) and tumor board conference presentation skills (25% [5 of 20] versus 0% [0 of 14], P = .06), while those in nonacademic settings more often chose current procedural terminology (CPT) coding, billing, and cost-effective patient care (79% [11 of 14] versus (35% [7 of 20]; P = .02). More female than male participants indicated that they wished they had received more guidance in leadership and soft skills (79% [11 of 14] versus 28% [5 of 18]; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS.— This study identified challenges experienced by junior pathologists. Collective efforts from training programs, experienced pathologists, and professional organizations can explore ways to improve the transition experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- DongHyang Kwon
- the Department of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia (Kwon)
| | - Mehran Taherian
- From the Departments of Pathology (Taherian, Aung), Biostatistics (Milton), and Academic Analytics and Technology (Iaeger), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Denái R Milton
- From the Departments of Pathology (Taherian, Aung), Biostatistics (Milton), and Academic Analytics and Technology (Iaeger), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Paula Iaeger
- From the Departments of Pathology (Taherian, Aung), Biostatistics (Milton), and Academic Analytics and Technology (Iaeger), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | | | - Phyu P Aung
- From the Departments of Pathology (Taherian, Aung), Biostatistics (Milton), and Academic Analytics and Technology (Iaeger), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pasvolsky O, Milton DR, Masood A, Sami SS, Tanner MR, Bashir Q, Srour S, Saini N, Lin P, Ramdial J, Nieto Y, Saeed A, Lee HC, Patel KK, Kebriaei P, Thomas SK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Single-agent lenalidomide maintenance after upfront autologous stem cell transplant for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The MD Anderson experience. Am J Hematol 2023; 98:1571-1578. [PMID: 37461327 PMCID: PMC10530277 DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
The optimal duration of lenalidomide (Len) maintenance for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) after autologous stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) is unknown. We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of adult MM patients that received upfront autoHCT between 2005 and 2021, followed by single-agent Len maintenance. A total of 1167 patients were included with a median age of 61.4 (range 25.4-82.3) years, and high-risk chromosomal abnormalities in 19%. Median duration of maintenance was 22.3 (range 0.03-139.6) months. After a median follow-up of 47.9 (range 2.9-171.7) months, median PFS and OS for the entire cohort were 56.6 (95% CI 48.2-61.4) months and 111.3 (95% CI 101.7-121.5) months, respectively. In MVA, high-risk cytogenetics was associated with a worse PFS (HR 1.91) and OS (HR 1.73) (p < .001 for both). Use of KRD induction and achievement of MRD-negative ≥ VGPR before autoHCT were associated with an improved PFS (HR 0.53 and HR 0.57, respectively; p < .001 for both). Longer maintenance duration, even with a 5-year cutoff, was associated with superior PFS and OS (HR 0.17 and 0.12, respectively; p < .001 for both). A total of 106 patients (9%) developed a second primary malignancy (SPM), mostly solid tumors (39%) and myeloid malignancies (30%). Longer maintenance duration was associated with a higher risk of SPM, reaching statistical significance after >2 years (odds ratio 2.25; p < .001). In conclusion, outcomes with Len maintenance were comparable to those reported in large clinical trials. Longer duration of maintenance, even beyond 5 years, was associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Pasvolsky
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Denái R. Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adeel Masood
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sophiya S. Sami
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mark R. Tanner
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul Lin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Arsalan Saeed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans C. Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina K. Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sheeba K. Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Donna M. Weber
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Z. Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J. Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E. Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shehabeldin A, Rohra P, Sellen LD, Zhao J, Alqaidy D, Aramin H, Hameed N, Perez YE, Lai Z, Tong YT, Milton DR, Edgerton ME, Fuller G, Hansel D, Prieto VG, Ballester LY, Aung PP. Utility of Whole Slide Imaging for Intraoperative Consultation: Experience of a Large Academic Center. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023:496084. [PMID: 37756559 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0105-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— In the United States, review of digital whole slide images (WSIs) using specific systems is approved for primary diagnosis but has not been implemented for intraoperative consultation. OBJECTIVE.— To evaluate the safety of review of WSIs and compare the efficiency of review of WSIs and glass slides (GSs) for intraoperative consultation. DESIGN.— Ninety-one cases previously submitted for frozen section evaluation were randomly selected from 8 different anatomic pathology subspecialties. GSs from these cases were scanned on a Leica Aperio AT2 scanner at ×20 magnification (0.25 μm/pixel). The slides were deidentified, and a short relevant clinical history was provided for each slide. Nine board-certified general pathologists who do not routinely establish primary diagnoses using WSIs reviewed the WSIs using Leica Aperio ImageScope viewing software. After a washout period of 2-3 weeks, the pathologists reviewed the corresponding GSs using a light microscope (Olympus BX43). The pathologists recorded the diagnosis and time to reach the diagnosis. Intraobserver concordance, time to diagnosis, and specificity and sensitivity compared to the original diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS.— The rate of intraobserver concordance between GS results and WSI results was 93.7%. Mean time to diagnosis was 1.25 minutes for GSs and 1.76 minutes for WSIs (P < .001). Specificity was 91% for GSs and 90% for WSIs; sensitivity was 92% for GSs and 92% for WSIs. CONCLUSIONS.— Time to diagnosis was longer with WSIs than with GSs, and scanning GSs and uploading the data to whole slide imaging systems takes time. However, review of WSIs appears to be a safe alternative to review of GSs. Use of WSIs allows reporting from a remote site during a public health emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic and facilitates subspecialty histopathology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Shehabeldin
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Prih Rohra
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Linton D Sellen
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Jianping Zhao
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Doaa Alqaidy
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Hermineh Aramin
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Nadia Hameed
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Ydamis Estrella Perez
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Zongshan Lai
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Yi Tat Tong
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Denái R Milton
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Mary E Edgerton
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Gregory Fuller
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Donna Hansel
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Victor G Prieto
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Leomar Y Ballester
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| | - Phyu P Aung
- From the Departments of Pathology (Shehabeldin, Rohra, Sellen, Zhao, Alqaidy, Aramin, Hameed, Perez, Lai, Tong, Edgerton, Fuller, Hansel, Prieto, Ballester, Aung) and Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Shehabeldin, Rohra, Ballester
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Al-Juhaishi T, Wang Y, Milton DR, Xu-Monette ZY, Jabbour E, Daher M, Im JS, Bashir Q, Iyer SP, Marin D, Olson AL, Popat U, Qazilbash M, Rondon G, Gulbis AM, Champlin RE, Young KH, Khouri IF. Clinical relevance of MYC/BCL2 expression and cell of origin in patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma treated with autologous transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 2023; 58:1000-1007. [PMID: 37198234 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-023-02006-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Dual expression of MYC and BCL2 proteins (double-expressor lymphoma [DEL]) as well as cell of origin (COO) are important prognostic factors in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after conventional chemotherapy. We studied the prognostic impact of DEL and COO in patients with relapsed DLBCL treated with autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Three-hundred and three patients with stored tissue samples were identified. Classification was successful in 267 patients: 161 (60%) were DEL/non-double hit (DHL), 98 (37%) were non-DEL/non-DHL, and 8 (3%) were DEL/DHL. Compared to non-DEL/non-DHL, DEL/DHL had worse overall survival while DEL/non-DHL did not significantly differ in overall survival. On multivariable analysis, DEL/DHL, age >60 years, and >2 prior therapies, but not COO, were important prognostic factors for overall survival. When we explored the interaction of COO and BCL2 expression, patients with germinal center B-cell (GCB)/BCL2 (+) had inferior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to GCB/BCL2 (-) patients (HR, 4.97; P = 0.027). We conclude that the DEL/non-DHL and non-DEL/non-DHL subtypes of DLBCL have similar survival after ASCT. The negative impact of GCB/BCL2 (+) on PFS warrants future trials targeting BCL2 after ASCT. The inferior outcomes in DEL/DHL need to be verified in a larger number of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taha Al-Juhaishi
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yingjun Wang
- Departments of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Division of Hematopathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zijun Y Xu-Monette
- Division of Hematopathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Elias Jabbour
- Departments of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - May Daher
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jin S Im
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Swaminathan P Iyer
- Departments of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- The Departement of Lymphoma & Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Marin
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amanda L Olson
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Uday Popat
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Muzaffar Qazilbash
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alison M Gulbis
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ken H Young
- Departments of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Division of Hematopathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Issa F Khouri
- Departments of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Altan M, Tu J, Milton DR, Yilmaz B, Tian Y, Fossella FV, Mott FE, Blumenschein GR, Stephen B, Karp DD, Meric-Bernstam F, Heymach JV, Naing A. Safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab in treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 2023; 129:2685-2693. [PMID: 37129197 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In lung cancer, overexpression of nuclear export proteins can result in inactivation of critical tumor suppressor proteins and cell-cycle regulators. Selective suppression of nuclear export proteins has immunomodulatory activities. Here, clinical safety and early efficacy data are presented on the combination of pembrolizumab and an oral selective nuclear export inhibitor, selinexor, for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). METHODS The primary objective of this prospective investigator-initiated study was to determine the safety and tolerability of selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with mNSCLC. Secondary objectives included determination of objective tumor response rate, disease control rate, and progression-free survival duration. RESULTS A total of 17 patients were included in the final analysis. Fifteen (88%) received more than two lines of prior systemic therapy and 10 (59%) had prior exposure to anti-PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. The median age was 67.5 years. Ten patients had grade ≥3 adverse events related to selinexor treatment. Responses to treatment occurred in patients who did and did not undergo previous anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and in patients with activating driver mutations. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.4 months (95% CI, 3.4-19.8 months) and 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.7-5.7 months), respectively. The overall response rate was 18% and the 6-month disease control rate was 24%. CONCLUSIONS Selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity in patients with mNSCLC, including those who had previously received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The therapy-related toxic effects were consistent with the prior safety data for both drugs, and no overlapping toxic effects were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02419495. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY New strategies to prevent or reverse resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors are under investigation. Selective inhibitors of nuclear export proteins, such as selinexor, can induce restoration of tumor-suppressing pathways and induce potent immunomodulatory activities. This article contains the clinical safety and early efficacy data on the combination of pembrolizumab and selinexor in treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Altan
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Janet Tu
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bulent Yilmaz
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yanyan Tian
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Frank V Fossella
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Frank E Mott
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - George R Blumenschein
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bettzy Stephen
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel D Karp
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - John V Heymach
- Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dimopoulos YP, Kwon D, Milton DR, Iaeger PI, Hansel DE, Prieto VG, Chin KE, Aung PP. Assessing the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Training at the MD Anderson Cancer Center Anatomical Pathology Fellowship Program. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023:495434. [PMID: 37639451 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2023-0166-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— To provide high-quality, safe training during the COVID-19 pandemic, our anatomic pathology fellowship program implemented a hybrid virtual/in-person training model with supplemental digital material. OBJECTIVE.— To evaluate the impact of this model. DESIGN.— We examined Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education survey results and board pass rates for fellows before the pandemic (group 1); during the pandemic peak (group 2); and early and late after the pandemic peak (groups 3 and 4). Additionally, we distributed an online survey including questions related to performance as attending physicians and fellowship experience to recent graduates. RESULTS.— Information loss during handover, supervision and teaching by faculty, and having at least 4 free days a month exhibited the greatest score declines between group 1 and groups 2, 3, and 4 on the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education surveys. No differences were seen in board passing rates between groups. The groups did not differ in responses regarding preparation for role as attending, confidence in role as attending, or overall impression of the fellowship program. The pandemic-affected groups responded more positively on the perceived utility of supplemental digital material, impact of digital pathology on quality of education, and impact of supplemental digital material on familiarity with digital pathology. The difference was particularly large between group 1 and combined groups 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS.— Despite the limitations noted, the hybrid training model was effective and successfully prepared fellows for their role as attending physicians. Similar studies can be informative for the implementation of similar programs or for the meaningful integration of digital pathology into training curricula.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - DongHyang Kwon
- University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; and the Department of Pathology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC (Kwon). Chin and Aung contributed equally
| | | | | | - Donna E Hansel
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dimopoulos, Hansel, Prieto, Chin, Aung)
| | - Victor G Prieto
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dimopoulos, Hansel, Prieto, Chin, Aung)
| | - Kareen E Chin
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dimopoulos, Hansel, Prieto, Chin, Aung)
| | - Phyu P Aung
- From the Departments of Pathology (Dimopoulos, Hansel, Prieto, Chin, Aung)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pasvolsky O, Marcoux C, Milton DR, Tanner MR, Bashir Q, Srour S, Saini N, Lin P, Ramdial J, Nieto Y, Lee HC, Patel KK, Kebriaei P, Tewari P, Crawford-Suber L, Thomas SK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Outcomes of young adults (aged ≤ 40 years) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after up-front autologous stem cell transplant. Br J Haematol 2023; 202:866-873. [PMID: 37376789 PMCID: PMC10527395 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) primarily affects older patients. There are scarce data on the outcomes of young adults undergoing autologous transplantation (auto-HCT). In this single-centre analysis, we included 117 younger patients, with a median age of 37 years (range 22-40) at transplant. Seventeen (15%) patients had high-risk cytogenetics. Before transplant, 10% of patients achieved ≥CR and 44% achieved ≥VGPR. At best post-transplant response, 56% and 77% of patients achieved ≥CR and ≥VGPR respectively. With a median follow-up for survivors of 72.6 months (range 0.9-238.0), median PFS and OS were 43.1 months (95% CI 31.2-65.0) and 146.6 months (95% CI 100.0-208.1) respectively. Patients who underwent auto-HCT after 2010 had better median PFS (84.9 months vs. 28.2 months, p < 0.001) and OS (NR vs. 91.8 months, p < 0.001) compared with those transplanted earlier. In multi-variate analysis, achieving ≥CR as best post-transplant response was associated with improved PFS (HR [95% CI] 0.55 [0.32-0.95], p = 0.032), while achieving ≥VGPR was predictive of superior OS (0.32 [0.16-0.62], p < 0.001). Three patients (3%) developed a second primary malignancy. Younger MM patients had durable survival after auto-HCT, which further improved after the availability of novel anti-myeloma drugs in recent years. Depth of response following transplant remains a key predictor of survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Pasvolsky
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Curtis Marcoux
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Denái R. Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mark R. Tanner
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul Lin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans C. Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina K. Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Priti Tewari
- Department of Pediatrics Patient Care, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lindsay Crawford-Suber
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| | - Sheeba K. Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Donna M. Weber
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Z. Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J. Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E. Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cho WC, Vanderbeck K, Nagarajan P, Milton DR, Gill P, Wang WL, Curry JL, Torres-Cabala CA, Ivan D, Prieto VG, Aung PP. SOX11 Is an Effective Discriminatory Marker, When Used in Conjunction With CK20 and TTF1, for Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Comparative Analysis of SOX11, CK20, PAX5, and TTF1 Expression in Merkel Cell Carcinoma and Pulmonary Small Cell Carcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023; 147:758-766. [PMID: 36745184 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0238-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Distinction between Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) and pulmonary small cell carcinoma (PSmCC) can be challenging, even with the aid of immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis of CK20 and TTF1, as these tumors occasionally lack classic immunophenotypes (CK20+/TTF1- in MCC and CK20-/TTF1+ in PSmCC). OBJECTIVE.— To evaluate the diagnostic utility of SOX11 and PAX5 IHC for distinguishing MCCs from PSmCCs and compare it with that of CK20 and TTF1 IHC. DESIGN.— SOX11, PAX5, CK20, and TTF1 expression (pattern, intensity, and proportion of tumor cells expressing protein) was assessed in 31 primary and 16 metastatic MCCs and 20 primary and 9 metastatic PSmCCs. RESULTS.— SOX11 expression was present in all MCCs and was predominantly strong and diffuse. Only 19% of primary and 38% of metastatic MCCs exhibited diffuse PAX5 expression; none exhibited strong immunoreactivity. Strong and diffuse SOX11 expression was seen in less than 25% of primary and metastatic PSmCCs. PAX5 expression was rare in PSmCCs and was mostly weak and focal/patchy. SOX11 expression in at least 26% of tumor cells, with at least moderate intensity, favored the diagnosis of MCC over PSmCC (P < .001). Furthermore, SOX11 expression was more likely than CK20 expression to be strong or diffuse in sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases of MCC, indicating that SOX11 is superior to CK20 for detecting tumor deposits in SLNs in MCC. CONCLUSIONS.— Our findings indicate that SOX11 not only is a powerful marker for distinguishing MCCs from PSmCCs, especially when used in conjunction with CK20 and TTF1, but also has utility for screening SLNs in MCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Cheal Cho
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| | - Kaitlin Vanderbeck
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| | - Priyadharsini Nagarajan
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| | | | - Pavandeep Gill
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston; and the Department of Pathology, Royal Jubilee Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (Gill). Cho, Vanderbeck, and Aung contributed equally to this manuscript
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| | - Doina Ivan
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| | - Victor G Prieto
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| | - Phyu P Aung
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Vanderbeck, Nagarajan, Wang, Curry, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Prieto, Aung)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Marques-Piubelli ML, Seervai RNH, Mudaliar KM, Ma W, Milton DR, Wang J, Muhlbauer A, Parra ER, Solis LM, Nagarajan P, Speiser J, Hudgens C, Cho WC, Aung PP, Patel A, Pacha O, Nelson KC, Tetzlaff MT, Amaria RN, Torres-Cabala CA, Prieto VG, Wistuba II, Curry JL. Gene expression profiling and multiplex immunofluorescence analysis of bullous pemphigoid immune-related adverse event reveal upregulation of toll-like receptor 4/complement-induced innate immune response and increased density of T H 1 T-cells. J Cutan Pathol 2023. [PMID: 37150813 DOI: 10.1111/cup.14442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based cancer therapies cause a variety of cutaneous immune-related adverse events (irAEs) including immunobullous skin eruptions like bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, little is known about the underlying immunopathogenic drivers of these reactions, and understanding the unique gene expression profile and immune composition of BP-irAE remains a critical knowledge gap in the field of oncodermatology/oncodermatopathology. METHODS BP-irAE (n = 8) and de novo BP control (n = 8) biopsy samples were subjected to gene expression profiling using the NanoString® Technologies nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel. Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) studies using markers for T-cells (CD3 and CD8), T helper 1 (TH 1) cells (Tbet), TH 2 cells (Gata3), TH 17 cells (RORγT), and regulatory T-cells (Tregs; FoxP3) were further evaluated using InForm® image analysis. RESULTS Compared with de novo BP controls, BP-irAE samples exhibited upregulation of 30 mRNA transcripts (p < 0.025), including toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and genes associated with complement activation, and downregulation of 89 mRNA transcripts (p < 0.025), including genes associated with TH 2, TH 17, and B-cell immune response. BP-irAE demonstrated a greater density of Tbet+ (TH 1) cells in the dermis (p = 0.004) and fewer Tregs in the blister floor (p = 0.028) when compared with that of de novo control BP samples. CONCLUSIONS BP-irAE exhibited activation of the TLR4/complement-driven classical innate immune response pathway, with dermal TH 1 immune cell polarization and decreased Tregs in the blister floor. TLR/complement signaling may underlie the immunopathogenesis of BP-irAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario L Marques-Piubelli
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Riyad N H Seervai
- Medical Scientist Training Program, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kumaran M Mudaliar
- Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Wencai Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aaron Muhlbauer
- Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Edwin R Parra
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Luisa M Solis
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priyadharsini Nagarajan
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jodi Speiser
- Department of Pathology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Courtney Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Woo Cheal Cho
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Phyu P Aung
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anisha Patel
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Omar Pacha
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kelly C Nelson
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Departments of Pathology and Dermatology, Oral Pathology and Dermatopathology Unit, The University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Pasvolsky O, Milton DR, Rauf M, Ghanem S, Masood A, Mohamedi AH, Tanner MR, Bashir Q, Srour S, Saini N, Lin P, Ramdial J, Nieto Y, Tang G, Lee HC, Patel KK, Kebriaei P, Thomas SK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Rezvani K, Champlin R, Shpall EJ, Lin P, Qazilbash MH. Impact of clonal plasma cells in autografts on outcomes in high-risk multiple myeloma patients. Blood Cancer J 2023; 13:68. [PMID: 37137874 PMCID: PMC10156676 DOI: 10.1038/s41408-023-00842-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Most patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHCT) eventually relapse, perhaps due to the presence of clonal plasma cells (CPC) in the autograft. We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of CPC in the autograft on the outcomes of high-risk chromosomal abnormalities (HRMM) patients undergoing autoHCT between 2008 and 2018. Patients were divided into CPC+ or CPC- in the autograft by next-generation flow cytometry (NGF). There were 75 CPC + autografts (18%) and 341 CPC- (82%). The CPC + group was less likely to achieve MRD-negative complete remission post-transplant (11% vs. 42%; p < 0.001). Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were (12.8 vs. 32.1 months) and (36.4 vs. 81.2 months) in the CPC + and CPC- groups, respectively (both p < 0.001). Also in the subset of patients with MRD-negative ≥VGPR prior to autoHCT, those with CPC + autografts had inferior PFS (HR 4.21, p = 0.006) and OS (HR 7.04, p = 0.002) compared to CPC-. In multivariable analysis, the degree of CPC positivity in the autograft was independently predictive of worse PFS (HR 1.50, p = 0.001) and OS (HR 1.37, p = 0.001). In conclusion, both the presence and degree of CPC in the autograft were highly predictive of inferior PFS and OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Pasvolsky
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mikael Rauf
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sassine Ghanem
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Adeel Masood
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ali H Mohamedi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mark R Tanner
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paul Lin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Guilin Tang
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Krina K Patel
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sheeba K Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Donna M Weber
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katy Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pei Lin
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nelson BE, Saleem S, Damodaran S, Somaiah N, Piha-Paul S, Moore JA, Yilmaz B, Ogbonna D, Karp DD, Ileana Dumbrava E, Tsimberidou AM, Hong DS, Rodon Ahnert J, Milton DR, Zheng X, Booser DJ, Ibrahim NK, Conley AP, Bhosale P, Rojas Hernandez CM, Tripathy D, Naing A, Meric-Bernstam F. Phase 1b study of combined selinexor and eribulin for the treatment of advanced solid tumors and triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer 2023. [PMID: 37016732 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 02/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selinexor (KPT-330) is a potent inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), in turn inhibiting tumor growth. Selinexor enhances the antitumor efficacy of eribulin in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in vitro and in vivo. Given the unmet medical need in TNBC and sarcoma, the authors explored the safety and efficacy of this combination. METHODS The authors conducted a phase 1b trial of combined selinexor and eribulin using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design in patients who had advanced solid tumors and in those who had TNBC in a dose-expansion cohort. RESULTS Patients with TNBC (N = 19), sarcoma (N = 9), and other cancers (N = 3) were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort (N = 10) and in the dose-expansion cohort (N = 21). The median number lines of prior therapy received was four (range, from one to seven prior lines). The most common treatment-related adverse events for selinexor were nausea (77%), leukopenia (77%), anemia (68%), neutropenia (68%), and fatigue (48%). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the first dose level with prolonged grade 3 neutropenia. The recommended phase 2 dose was 80 mg of selinexor orally once per week and 1 mg/m2 eribulin on days 1 and 8 intravenously every 3 weeks. The objective response rate (ORR) was 10% in three patients. In the dose-escalation cohort, the ORR was 10%, whereas six patients with had stable disease. In the TNBC dose-expansion cohort (n = 18), ORR was 11%, and there were two confirmed partial responses with durations of 10.8 and 19.1 months (ongoing). CONCLUSIONS Selinexor and eribulin had an acceptable toxicity profile and modest overall efficacy with durable responses in select patients. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Effective therapies for advanced, triple-negative breast cancer and sarcoma represent an unmet need. Exportin 1 is associated with the transport of cancer-related proteins. Preclinical studies have demonstrated tumor growth inhibition and enhanced tumor sensitivity in patients who receive selinexor combined with eribulin. In this phase 1b study, the authors evaluated the safety profile and clinical activity of the combination of selinexor, a potent oral inhibitor of exportin 1, and eribulin in patients with advanced cancers enriched for triple-negative breast cancer or sarcoma. The combination was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate, reversible, and managed with dose modifications or growth factor support. The combination of selinexor and eribulin produced an antitumor response, particularly in some patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This work lays the foundation for prospective investigations of the role of selinexor and eribulin in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blessie Elizabeth Nelson
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sadia Saleem
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Senthil Damodaran
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neeta Somaiah
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Sarina Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Julia Ann Moore
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Bulent Yilmaz
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Deby Ogbonna
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel D Karp
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ecaterina Ileana Dumbrava
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jordi Rodon Ahnert
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Xiaofeng Zheng
- Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel J Booser
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nuhad K Ibrahim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony P Conley
- Department of Sarcoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Debasish Tripathy
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pasvolsky O, Gaballa MR, Milton DR, Masood A, Sami SS, Tanner MR, Bashir Q, Srour S, Saini N, Ramdial J, Nieto Y, Tang G, Lin P, Lee HC, Patel KK, Kebriaei P, Thomas SK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Multiple Myeloma with Translocation (4;14): The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience. Transplant Cell Ther 2023; 29:260.e1-260.e6. [PMID: 36646323 PMCID: PMC10040427 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Translocation between chromosomes 4 and 14, t(4;14), has been reported in 15% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and is considered a high-risk cytogenetic abnormality associated with inferior outcomes. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) is standard of care for patients with high-risk MM, yet there are scarce data on post-transplantation outcomes of patients with t(4;14) MM. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of MM patients with t(4;14) who underwent auto-HCT and received contemporary anti-myeloma agents for induction and post-transplantation maintenance. We conducted a retrospective analysis of MM patients with t(4;14), detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), who underwent auto-HCT between 2008 and 2018 at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were hematologic response and minimal residual disease (MRD) status after auto-HCT. MRD status in the bone marrow biopsy was evaluated using 8-color next-generation flow cytometry with a sensitivity of 1/10-5 cells. Seventy-nine patients were included (52% male), with a median age of 60 years (range, 32 to 78 years). Forty-four patients (56%) had an additional high-risk cytogenetic abnormality. Fifty patients (63%) achieved at least a very good partial response (≥VGPR) prior to auto-HCT and 20 (25%) had MRD-negative ≥VGPR. At the best post-transplantation evaluation, 90% had ≥VGPR and 63% had MRD-negative ≥VGPR. The median follow-up for survivors was 35.7 months (range, 7.7 to 111.6 months). For the entire cohort, median PFS and OS were 22.9 months and 60.4 months, respectively. Patients with MRD-negative ≥VGPR prior to transplantation had improved PFS and OS on both univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariate analysis (MVA) (hazard ratio [HR], .35 [95% confidence interval (CI), .16 to .76; P = .008] and .12 [95% CI, .03 to .44; P = .002], respectively). The presence of additional high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities was not associated with inferior PFS (P = .57) or OS (P = .70). Post-transplantation lenalidomide-based combinations were associated with improved OS in both UVA and MVA (HR, .14; 95% CI, .04 to .45; P = .001), while their impact on PFS was not statistically significant (P = .37). Our results consolidate t(4;14) as a high-risk abnormality associated with poor outcomes despite novel agent induction, auto-HCT, and post-transplantation maintenance. Despite some inherent study design limitations, including a relatively small cohort and heterogeneity in treatment, we observed that deeper pretransplantation response and post-transplantation maintenance with lenalidomide-based combination were associated with improved outcomes. Novel immune and cellular therapies are needed to improve the outcomes in patients with t(4;14).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oren Pasvolsky
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Institute of Hematology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mahmoud R Gaballa
- Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adeel Masood
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sophiya S Sami
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mark R Tanner
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Guilin Tang
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Pei Lin
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina K Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sheeba K Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Donna M Weber
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Afrough A, Alsfeld LC, Milton DR, Delgado R, Popat UR, Nieto Y, Kebriaei P, Oran B, Saini N, Srour S, Hosing C, Cheema FH, Ahmed S, Manasanch EE, Lee HC, Kaufman GP, Patel KK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Pinnix CC, Dabaja BS, Thomas SK, Champlin RE, Shpall EJ, Qazilbash MH, Bashir Q. Long-Term Outcomes of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. Transplant Cell Ther 2023; 29:264.e1-264.e9. [PMID: 35605883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.05.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Despite remarkable progress in survival with the availability of novel agents, an overwhelming majority of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have disease that relapses. Allogeneic (allo-) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is a potentially curative option for a subgroup of patients with high-risk MM. This study assessed the long-term outcome of MM patients who underwent allo-HCT while in first remission as consolidation treatment. Thirty-three patients with newly diagnosed MM who underwent allo-HCT as part of consolidation therapy between 1994 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Of these patients, 70% underwent autologous HCT before allo-HCT. All patients were chemosensitive and achieved at least partial response before proceeding to allo-HCT. Most received nonmyeloablative/reduced-intensity conditioning (88%) and a matched sibling donor graft (85%). Acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic GVHD occurred in 30% and 61% of patients, respectively. The median duration of follow-up was 64.1 months (range, 1.4 to 199.2 months) for all patients and 164.4 months (range, 56.0 to 199.2 months) for survivors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 36 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 8.6 to 73.0 months). The median time from treatment to progression was 73.0 months (95% CI, 30.6 months to not reached). The median overall survival (OS) was 131.9 months (95% CI, 38.4 months to not reached). Of all patients, 39% were alive for more than 10 years, with 46% (n = 6) without progression or relapse. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 18% at 1 year, 39% at 5 years, and 46% at 10 years post-allo-HCT. The cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality was 3% at 100 days, 18% at 1 year, 21% at 3 years, and 24% at 5 year post-allo-HCT. On multivariable analysis, high-risk cytogenetics were associated with a shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7; 95% CI, 1.01 to 7.21; P = .047) and OS (HR, 4.91; 95% CI, 1.48 to 16.27; P = .009). Achieving complete remission after allo-HCT also was associated with longer PFS (HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.64; P = .004) and OS (HR, .23; 95% CI, .07 to .72; P = .012). Allo-HCT may confer a survival advantage in a selected population of MM patients when performed early in the disease course; additional data on identifying the patients who will benefit the most are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimaz Afrough
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Leonard C Alsfeld
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ruby Delgado
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Faisal H Cheema
- The University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elisabet E Manasanch
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gregory P Kaufman
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina K Patel
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Donna M Weber
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bouthaina S Dabaja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sheeba K Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Amaria RN, Postow M, Burton EM, Tetzlaff MT, Ross MI, Torres-Cabala C, Glitza IC, Duan F, Milton DR, Busam K, Simpson L, McQuade JL, Wong MK, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, Goepfert RP, Keung EZ, Fisher SB, Betof-Warner A, Shoushtari AN, Callahan M, Coit D, Bartlett EK, Bello D, Momtaz P, Nicholas C, Gu A, Zhang X, Korivi BR, Patnana M, Patel SP, Diab A, Lucci A, Prieto VG, Davies MA, Allison JP, Sharma P, Wargo JA, Ariyan C, Tawbi HA. Author Correction: Neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab in resectable melanoma. Nature 2023; 615:E23. [PMID: 36894629 PMCID: PMC10033416 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05892-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Carlos Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fei Duan
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Klaus Busam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren Simpson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Allison Betof-Warner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander N Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Coit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle Bello
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Momtaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Courtney Nicholas
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidi Gu
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xuejun Zhang
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brinda Rao Korivi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Madhavi Patnana
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James P Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Charlotte Ariyan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hasanov M, Milton DR, Bea Davies A, Sirmans E, Saberian C, Posada EL, Opusunju S, Gershenwald JE, Torres-Cabala CA, Burton EM, Colen R, Huse JT, Glitza Oliva IC, Chung C, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Yeboa DN, Kim BYS, Prabhu SS, McCutcheon IE, Weinberg J, Lang FF, Tawbi HA, Li J, Haydu LE, Davies MA, Ferguson SD. Changes In Outcomes And Factors Associated With Survival In Melanoma Patients With Brain Metastases. Neuro Oncol 2022:6889653. [PMID: 36510640 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUD Treatment options for patients with melanoma brain metastasis (MBM) have changed significantly in the last decade. Few studies have evaluated changes in outcomes and factors associated with survival in MBM patients over time. The aim of this study is to evaluate changes in clinical features and overall survival (OS) for MBM patients. METHODS Patients diagnosed with MBMs from 1/1/2009-12/31/2013 (Prior Era; PE) and 1/1/2014-12/31/2018 (Current Era; CE) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were included in this retrospective analysis. The primary outcome measure was OS. Log-rank test assessed differences between groups; multivariable analyses were performed with Cox proportional hazards models and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). RESULTS 791 MBM patients (PE, n=332; CE, n=459) were included in analysis. Median OS from MBM diagnosis was 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.9 - 12.4) and improved in the CE versus PE (14.4 vs. 10.3 months, P < .001). Elevated serum LDH was the only factor associated with worse OS in both PE and CE patients. Factors associated with survival in CE MBM patients included patient age, primary tumor Breslow thickness, prior immunotherapy, leptomeningeal disease (LMD), symptomatic MBMs, and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Several factors associated with OS in the PE were not significant in the CE. RPA demonstrated that elevated serum LDH and prior immunotherapy treatment are the most important determinants of survival in CE MBM patients. CONCLUSIONS OS and factors associated with OS have changed for MBM patients. This information can inform contemporary patient management and clinical investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merve Hasanov
- Department of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Alicia Bea Davies
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Elizabeth Sirmans
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Chantal Saberian
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Eliza L Posada
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sylvia Opusunju
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Rivka Colen
- Center for Artificial Intelligence Innovation in Medical Imaging, University of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, PA
| | - Jason T Huse
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Caroline Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Betty Y S Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sujit S Prabhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ian E McCutcheon
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey Weinberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Frederick F Lang
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Lauren E Haydu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Sherise D Ferguson
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Singh H, Srour SA, Milton DR, McCarty J, Dai C, Gaballa MR, Ammari M, Olivares S, Huls H, De Groot E, Marin D, Petropoulos D, Olson AL, Anderlini P, Im JS, Khouri I, Hosing CM, Rezvani K, Champlin RE, Shpall EJ, Cooper LJN, Kebriaei P. Sleeping beauty generated CD19 CAR T-Cell therapy for advanced B-Cell hematological malignancies. Front Immunol 2022; 13:1032397. [PMID: 36439104 PMCID: PMC9684710 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1032397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged recently as a standard of care treatment for patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and several subtypes of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, its use remains limited to highly specialized centers, given the complexity of its administration and its associated toxicities. We previously reported our experience in using a novel Sleeping Beauty (SB) CD19-specific CAR T-cell therapy in the peri-transplant setting, where it exhibited an excellent safety profile with encouraging survival outcomes. We have since modified the SB CD19 CAR construct to improve its efficacy and shorten its manufacturing time. We report here the phase 1 clinical trial safety results. Fourteen heavily treated patients with relapsed/refractory ALL and NHL were infused. Overall, no serious adverse events were directly attributed to the study treatment. Three patients developed grades 1-2 cytokine release syndrome and none of the study patients experienced neurotoxicity. All dose levels were well tolerated and no dose-limiting toxicities were reported. For efficacy, 3 of 8 (38%) patients with ALL achieved CR/CRi (complete remission with incomplete count recovery) and 1 (13%) patient had sustained molecular disease positivity. Of the 4 patients with DLBCL, 2 (50%) achieved CR. The SB-based CAR constructs allow manufacturing of targeted CAR T-cell therapies that are safe, cost-effective and with encouraging antitumor activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harjeet Singh
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Samer A. Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Denái R. Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jessica McCarty
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Cuiping Dai
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mahmoud R. Gaballa
- Cellular Therapy Program and Bone Marrow Transplant Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Mariam Ammari
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Simon Olivares
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Helen Huls
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - David Marin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Demetrios Petropoulos
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Amanda L. Olson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Paolo Anderlini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jin S. Im
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Issa Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Chitra M. Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Katayoun Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Richard E. Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Elizabeth J. Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | | | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States,*Correspondence: Partow Kebriaei,
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Amaria RN, Postow M, Burton EM, Tetzlaff MT, Ross MI, Torres-Cabala C, Glitza IC, Duan F, Milton DR, Busam K, Simpson L, McQuade JL, Wong MK, Gershenwald JE, Lee JE, Goepfert RP, Keung EZ, Fisher SB, Betof-Warner A, Shoushtari AN, Callahan M, Coit D, Bartlett EK, Bello D, Momtaz P, Nicholas C, Gu A, Zhang X, Korivi BR, Patnana M, Patel SP, Diab A, Lucci A, Prieto VG, Davies MA, Allison JP, Sharma P, Wargo JA, Ariyan C, Tawbi HA. Neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab in resectable melanoma. Nature 2022; 611:155-160. [PMID: 36289334 PMCID: PMC9607737 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05368-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Relatlimab and nivolumab combination immunotherapy improves progression-free survival over nivolumab monotherapy in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma1. We investigated this regimen in patients with resectable clinical stage III or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma (NCT02519322). Patients received two neoadjuvant doses (nivolumab 480 mg and relatlimab 160 mg intravenously every 4 weeks) followed by surgery, and then ten doses of adjuvant combination therapy. The primary end point was pathologic complete response (pCR) rate2. The combination resulted in 57% pCR rate and 70% overall pathologic response rate among 30 patients treated. The radiographic response rate using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 was 57%. No grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events were observed in the neoadjuvant setting. The 1- and 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was 100% and 92% for patients with any pathologic response, compared to 88% and 55% for patients who did not have a pathologic response (P = 0.005). Increased immune cell infiltration at baseline, and decrease in M2 macrophages during treatment, were associated with pathologic response. Our results indicate that neoadjuvant relatlimab and nivolumab induces a high pCR rate. Safety during neoadjuvant therapy is favourable compared to other combination immunotherapy regimens. These data, in combination with the results of the RELATIVITY-047 trial1, provide further confirmation of the efficacy and safety of this new immunotherapy regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodabe N Amaria
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Postow
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Burton
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Merrick I Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Carlos Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isabella C Glitza
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Fei Duan
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Klaus Busam
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lauren Simpson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer L McQuade
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael K Wong
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Jeffrey E Lee
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Emily Z Keung
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Allison Betof-Warner
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alexander N Shoushtari
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Margaret Callahan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel Coit
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edmund K Bartlett
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle Bello
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Parisa Momtaz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Courtney Nicholas
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aidi Gu
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xuejun Zhang
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brinda Rao Korivi
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Madhavi Patnana
- Department of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sapna P Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lucci
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - James P Allison
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Padmanee Sharma
- Department of Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Charlotte Ariyan
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hussein A Tawbi
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Rothrock AT, Torres-Cabala CA, Milton DR, Cho WC, Nagarajan P, Vanderbeck K, Curry JL, Ivan D, Prieto VG, Aung PP. Diagnostic utility of PRAME expression by immunohistochemistry in subungual and non-subungual acral melanocytic lesions. J Cutan Pathol 2022; 49:859-867. [PMID: 35794643 DOI: 10.1111/cup.14290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The immunohistochemical (IHC) marker PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has shown promise in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. A few studies have investigated PRAME IHC expression in acral melanomas, but PRAME expression in subungual melanomas is largely unknown. We evaluated the utility of PRAME IHC expression in distinguishing subungual melanomas (SUM) and non-subungual acral melanomas (AM) from acral nevi (AN). METHODS Twenty-two SUM, 20 AM, and 14 AN were identified. IHC studies were performed using an anti-PRAME antibody. The percentage of lesional cells with PRAME expression was recorded and categorized as follows: 0%, 0; 1%-25%, 1+; 26%-50%, 2+; 51%-75%, 3+; and >75%, 4+. Patient demographics and other relevant clinicopathologic parameters were recorded. RESULTS Diffuse (4+) PRAME IHC expression was identified in 55% (12/22) SUM and 70% (14/20) AM, respectively. Any PRAME expression (1+ to 4+) was identified in 73% (16/22) SUMs and 95% (19/20) AM, respectively. One of 14 (7%) AN exhibited PRAME expression; interestingly, the pattern of expression was diffuse. CONCLUSIONS In our study, PRAME IHC expression was useful in identifying AM, including SUM. However, there are exceptions of PRAME-negative melanomas and PRAME-positive nevi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aimi T Rothrock
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Woo Cheal Cho
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Priyadharsini Nagarajan
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kaitlin Vanderbeck
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Doina Ivan
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Phyu P Aung
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Farah M, Milton DR, Gross ND, Nagarajan P, Gu J, Curry JL, Ivan D, Torres-Cabala CA, Myers JN, Prieto VG, Aung PP. Histopathologic features predictive of metastasis and survival in 230 patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and non-head and neck locations: a single-center retrospective study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36:1246-1255. [PMID: 35426183 DOI: 10.1111/jdv.18147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2021] [Revised: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Staging systems for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) produce inconsistent risk stratification. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to identify further prognostic parameters for better stratification. METHODS We retrospectively analysed the prognostic significance of clinicopathologic parameters of 230 patients who underwent primary excision of invasive cSCC of the head and neck (n = 115) and non-head and non-neck (n = 115) locations. In addition to known high-risk features, we analysed tumour nest shape, invasion pattern, lymphoid response pattern and tumour budding. RESULTS On multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and high tumour budding predicted worse disease-specific survival, and ulceration, LVI and high tumour budding predicted worse overall survival. Only ulceration was independently associated with risk of nodal metastasis. CONCLUSION High tumour budding, LVI and ulceration are independently associated with poor outcome in cSCC and may be used to refine cSCC prognostic stratification, which is crucial to optimize clinical decision and to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from more aggressive interventions or clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Farah
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - D R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - N D Gross
- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P Nagarajan
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Gu
- Cytogenetic Technology Program, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J L Curry
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - D Ivan
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C A Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J N Myers
- Head and Neck Surgery, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - V G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P P Aung
- Department of Pathology, School of Health Professions, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pasvolsky O, Milton DR, Rauf M, Tanner MR, Bashir Q, Srour S, Tang G, Saini N, Ramdial J, Masood A, Nieto Y, Lee HC, Patel KK, Kebriaei P, Thomas SK, Weber DM, Orlowski RZ, Shpall EJ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Lenalidomide-Based Maintenance after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with High-Risk Multiple Myeloma. Transplant Cell Ther 2022; 28:752.e1-752.e6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.07.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
30
|
Gaballa MR, Banerjee P, Milton DR, Jiang X, Ganesh C, Khazal S, Nandivada V, Islam S, Kaplan M, Daher M, Basar R, Alousi A, Mehta R, Alatrash G, Khouri I, Oran B, Marin D, Popat U, Olson A, Tewari P, Jain N, Jabbour E, Ravandi F, Kantarjian H, Chen K, Champlin R, Shpall E, Rezvani K, Kebriaei P. Blinatumomab maintenance after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 2022; 139:1908-1919. [PMID: 34914826 PMCID: PMC8952188 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2021013290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are at high-risk for relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). We conducted a single-center phase 2 study evaluating the feasibility of 4 cycles of blinatumomab administered every 3 months during the first year after HCT in an effort to mitigate relapse in high-risk ALL patients. Twenty-one of 23 enrolled patients received at least 1 cycle of blinatumomab and were included in the analysis. The median time from HCT to the first cycle of blinatumomab was 78 days (range, 44 to 105). Twelve patients (57%) completed all 4 treatment cycles. Neutropenia was the only grade 4 adverse event (19%). Rates of cytokine release (5% G1) and neurotoxicity (5% G2) were minimal. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) grades 2 to 4 and 3 to 4 were 33% and 5%, respectively; 2 cases of mild (10%) and 1 case of moderate (5%) chronic GVHD were noted. With a median follow-up of 14.3 months, the 1-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) rates were 85%, 71%, and 0%, respectively. In a matched analysis with a contemporary cohort of 57 patients, we found no significant difference between groups regarding blinatumomab's efficacy. Correlative studies of baseline and posttreatment samples identified patients with specific T-cell profiles as "responders" or "nonresponders" to therapy. Responders had higher proportions of effector memory CD8 T-cell subsets. Nonresponders were T-cell deficient and expressed more inhibitory checkpoint molecules, including T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM3). We found that blinatumomab postallogeneic HCT is feasible, and its benefit is dependent on the immune milieu at time of treatment. This paper is posted on ClinicalTrials.gov, study ID: NCT02807883.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud R Gaballa
- Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy Program, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pinaki Banerjee
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | | | - Xianli Jiang
- Department of Bioinformatics & Computational Biology; and
| | - Christina Ganesh
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Sajad Khazal
- Department of Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy and
| | | | - Sanjida Islam
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Mecit Kaplan
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - May Daher
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Rafet Basar
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Amin Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Rohtesh Mehta
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Gheath Alatrash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Issa Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - David Marin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Amanda Olson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Priti Tewari
- Department of Pediatric Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy and
| | - Nitin Jain
- Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elias Jabbour
- Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Farhad Ravandi
- Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hagop Kantarjian
- Department of Leukemia, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ken Chen
- Department of Bioinformatics & Computational Biology; and
| | - Richard Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Elizabeth Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Katayoun Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Mukherjee A, Milton DR, Jabbour EJ, Gulbis AM, Kadia T, Jain N, Ledesma C, Burger J, Ferrajoli A, Wierda W, Medeiros LJ, Kantarjian H, Champlin R, Khouri IF. Clinical outcome of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies following treatment with targeted small molecule inhibitors. Leuk Lymphoma 2022; 63:885-893. [PMID: 35225133 PMCID: PMC9730341 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2043302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to study the risks of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and survival outcomes of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n = 17), Richter's syndrome (n = 14), or lymphoma (n = 18) after small molecule inhibitors (SMIs). Patients had a median of 4 prior therapies, including ibrutinib (n = 46; 94%), venetoclax (n = 19; 39%), and idelalisib (n = 6; 12%). Twenty-one (43%) had >1 SMI. P53 mutation was detected in 58% of patients. The 3-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 68% and 59%, respectively. The rates of grade II-IV and III-IV acute GVHD were 33% and 7%. The 1-year rates of chronic GVHD, NRM and relapse were 19%, 10% and 21%, respectively. Results were comparable to a historical control of patients who received alloSCT without a prior exposure to SMI. We conclude that a prior use of SMI does not impair the outcomes after alloSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akash Mukherjee
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R. Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elias J. Jabbour
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alison M. Gulbis
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tapan Kadia
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nitin Jain
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Celina Ledesma
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jan Burger
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alessandra Ferrajoli
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - William Wierda
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - L. Jeffrey Medeiros
- Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hagop Kantarjian
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Issa F. Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Thein KZ, Fu S, Janku F, Tsimberidou AM, Piha-Paul SA, Karp DD, Shah J, Milton DR, Gong J, Sulovic S, McQuinn L, Stephen BA, Colen RR, Carter BW, Meric-Bernstam F, Naing A. Selinexor in Combination with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors: Results of an Open-Label, Single-Center, Multi-Arm Phase 1b Study. J Immunother Precis Oncol 2022; 5:10-12. [PMID: 35663832 PMCID: PMC9138422 DOI: 10.36401/jipo-21-20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kyaw Z Thein
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University/Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarina A Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel D Karp
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jatin Shah
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Gong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Selma Sulovic
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lacey McQuinn
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bettzy A Stephen
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rivka R Colen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brett W Carter
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Thein KZ, Piha-Paul SA, Tsimberidou A, Karp DD, Janku F, Fu S, Subbiah V, Hong DS, Yap TA, Shah J, Milton DR, McQuinn L, Gong J, Tran Y, Carter BW, Colen R, Meric-Bernstam F, Naing A. Selinexor in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Exp Hematol Oncol 2021; 10:59. [PMID: 34965890 PMCID: PMC8715578 DOI: 10.1186/s40164-021-00251-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), was demonstrated to hinder the DNA damage repair (DDR) system by reducing DDR proteins while enhancing the killing of cancer cells by DDR-based therapeutics in vivo studies. In this single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study, selinexor with carboplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (DC), irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFIRI), irinotecan, and capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), were employed as separate parallel arms. Eligible patients have relapsed/ metastatic refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or addition of selinexor to systemic therapy was appropriate. Nineteen patients were treated in the 5 arms. Tumor types included were colorectal (n = 3), breast (n = 3), neuroendocrine (n = 2), ovarian (n = 2), and pancreas cancers (n = 2). All patients developed one treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most prevalent TRAE were thrombocytopenia (84%), nausea (68%), leukopenia (68%), neutropenia (63%), and fatigue (58%). The common grade 3/4 TRAE were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (26%), and hyponatremia (21%). Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 3 separate arms. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response. Although no patients achieved complete or partial response (CR or PR), seven patients attained stable disease (SD). Disease control rate (DCR) was 14%. The combination of oral selinexor with different standard chemotherapies showed limited clinical activity despite toxicity and DLT prevented further dose escalation. Optimizing supportive care, the utility of growth factors, and aggressive measures on antiemetics strategies remain tangible. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495). Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyaw Z Thein
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University/Knight Cancer Institute, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Mail Code: OC14HO, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
| | - Sarina A Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Apostolia Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Daniel D Karp
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jatin Shah
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lacey McQuinn
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Gong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yanyan Tran
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brett W Carter
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rivka Colen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Thein KZ, Karp DD, Tsimberidou A, Gong J, Sulovic S, Shah J, Milton DR, Hong DS, Janku F, McQuinn L, Stephen BA, Colen R, Carter BW, Yap TA, Piha-Paul SA, Fu S, Meric-Bernstam F, Naing A. Correction to: Selinexor in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors: results of a single‑center, multi‑arm phase Ib study. Invest New Drugs 2021; 40:463. [PMID: 34731355 PMCID: PMC8993707 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01194-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kyaw Z Thein
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University/ Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Daniel D Karp
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Apostolia Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Gong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Selma Sulovic
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jatin Shah
- , Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lacey McQuinn
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bettzy A Stephen
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rivka Colen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brett W Carter
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarina A Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Thoracic Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Khouri IF, Milton DR, Gulbis AM, Jabbour EJ, Nastoupil L, Ledesma C, Anderlini P, Bashir Q, Daher M, Im JS, Iyer SP, Marin D, Mehta RS, Olson AL, Popat UR, Qazilbash M, Saini N, Samaniego F, Rondon G, Medeiros LJ, Champlin RE. Nine-Year Follow-up of Patients with Relapsed Follicular Lymphoma after Nonmyeloablative Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant and Autologous Transplant. Clin Cancer Res 2021; 27:5847-5856. [PMID: 34380640 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare outcomes between patients with relapsed follicular lymphoma who received a nonmyeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) and those who received an autologous transplant (autoSCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS We evaluated 194 patients with follicular lymphoma who received an alloSCT (n = 98) or autoSCT (n = 96) at MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX). The transplant type used was based on donor availability and by Medicare reimbursement guidelines. Patients who received an alloSCT were enrolled in four consecutive trials in which they received fludarabine, cyclophosphamide (or bendamustine), and rituximab conditioning. autoSCT patients received R-BEAM (rituximab, carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan). RESULTS The median follow-up of survivors was 108 months for the alloSCT group and 102 months for the autoSCT group. Overall survival was significantly better for patients who received an alloSCT compared with those who received an autoSCT (62% vs. 46%; P = 0.048). Similarly, progression-free survival rates were 52% in patients who received an alloSCT and 31% in those who received an autoSCT (P < 0.001), and the 8-year relapse rates were 11% and 43%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Only three patients in the alloSCT group relapsed beyond 3.5 years. In the alloSCT group, the rates for grade 2 to 4 acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), grade 3 to 4 acute GVHD, and extensive chronic GVHD were 22%, 9%, and 38%, respectively. In the autoSCT group, the 8-year incidence of secondary myelodysplasia was 11%. Nonrelapse mortality was similar between the two groups (15% vs. 11% at 8 years; P = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS This study shows that alloSCT is curative and confers superior survival compared with autoSCT in patients with follicular lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issa F Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alison M Gulbis
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elias J Jabbour
- Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Loretta Nastoupil
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Celina Ledesma
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paolo Anderlini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - May Daher
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jin S Im
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Swaminathan P Iyer
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Marin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rohtesh S Mehta
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda L Olson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Felipe Samaniego
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - L Jeffrey Medeiros
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hasanov M, Milton DR, Sharfman WH, Taback B, Cranmer LD, Daniels GA, Flaherty L, Hallmeyer S, Milhem M, Feun L, Hauke R, Doolittle G, Gregory N, Patel S. An Open-Label, Randomized, Multi-Center Study Comparing the Sequence of High Dose Aldesleukin (Interleukin-2) and Ipilimumab (Yervoy) in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma. Oncoimmunology 2021; 10:1984059. [PMID: 34650833 PMCID: PMC8510610 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2021.1984059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Combination immunotherapy with sequential administration may enhance metastatic melanoma (MM) patients with long-term disease control. High Dose Aldesleukin/Recombinant Interleukin-2 (HD rIL-2) and ipilimumab (IPI) offer complementary mechanisms against MM. This phase IV study assessed the sequenced use of HD rIL-2 and IPI in MM patients. Eligible Stage IV MM patients were randomized to treatment with either two courses of HD rIL-2(600,000 IU/kg) followed by four doses of IPI 3 mg/kg or vice-versa. The primary objective was to compare one-year overall survival (OS) with historical control (46%, Hodi et al., NEJM 2010). Secondary objectives were 1-year progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) profile. Evaluable Population (EP) included patients who received at least 50% of planned treatment with each drug. Thirteen and 16 patients were randomized to receive HD rIL-2 first, and IPI first, respectively. One-year OS rate was 75% for intention to treat population. Eighteen patients were included in EP, 8 in HD rIL-2, 10 in IPI first arm. In EP, 1-year OS, PFS and ORR rates were 87%, 68%, and 50%, respectively. The frequency of AEs was similar in both arms with 13 patients experiencing Grade 3 or higher AEs, 3 resulting in the end of study participation. There was one HD rIL-2-related death, from cerebral hemorrhage due to thrombocytopenia. In this study with small sample size, HD rIL-2 and IPI were safe to administer sequentially in MM patients and showed more than additive effects. 1-year OS was superior to that of IPI alone from historical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merve Hasanov
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - William H Sharfman
- Department of Medical Oncology and Dermatology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Lutherville, USA
| | - Bret Taback
- Department of Surgery, Division of Breast Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, USA
| | - Lee D Cranmer
- University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, Az, Usa. Present Affiliation and Contact: Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, and Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Gregory A Daniels
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA
| | - Lawrence Flaherty
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, USA
| | - Sigrun Hallmeyer
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Advocate Medical Group, Park Ridge, USA
| | - Mohammed Milhem
- Section of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA
| | - Lynn Feun
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Miami Health System, Miami, USA
| | | | - Gary Doolittle
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, USA
| | | | - Sapna Patel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas Md Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cho WC, Wang WL, Milton DR, Ingram DR, Nagarajan P, Curry JL, Ivan D, Lazar AJ, Hwu WJ, Prieto VG, Torres-Cabala CA, Aung PP. Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Protein Expression Is More Frequent in Acral Lentiginous Melanoma Than in Other Types of Cutaneous Melanoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 145:842-850. [PMID: 33053175 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0330-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Molecularly distinct from cutaneous melanomas arising from sun-exposed sites, acral lentiginous melanomas (ALMs) typically lack ultraviolet-signature mutations, such as telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter mutations. Instead, ALMs show a high degree of copy number alterations, often with multiple amplifications of TERT, which are associated with adverse prognosis. The prognostic value of TERT protein expression in acral melanomas, however, is not established. OBJECTIVE.— To evaluate the frequency and pattern of TERT immunoreactivity and assess the potential utility of TERT expression as a prognostic indicator in ALMs. DESIGN.— TERT expression by immunohistochemistry was analyzed in a series of 57 acral and nonacral melanocytic lesions, including 24 primary and 6 metastatic ALMs. Clinical outcome in patients with ALMs by TERT expression was assessed. RESULTS.— TERT expression was more frequent in ALMs than in nonlentiginous acral melanomas and nonacral cutaneous melanomas, and was absent in acral nevi (P = .01). When present, TERT expression in ALMs was cytoplasmic and more intense than TERT expression in other melanocytic lesions (P = .05) with a higher H-score (P = .01). There was a trend toward decreased overall survival in patients with ALMs with TERT immunoreactivity, but it did not reach statistical significance. Furthermore, no correlation was found between TERT expression and disease-specific survival in patients with ALMs. CONCLUSIONS.— Although TERT protein expression was frequently detected in both primary and metastatic ALMs, TERT immunoreactivity in ALMs did not correlate with survival in our study. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to elucidate the prognostic value of TERT expression in ALMs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Cheal Cho
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Wei-Lien Wang
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Translational Molecular Pathology (Wang, Ingram, Lazar), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Denái R Milton
- Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Davis R Ingram
- Translational Molecular Pathology (Wang, Ingram, Lazar), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Priyadharsini Nagarajan
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Doina Ivan
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Alexander J Lazar
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Translational Molecular Pathology (Wang, Ingram, Lazar), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Melanoma Medical Oncology (Lazar), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston. Torres-Cabala and Aung contributed equally to this work
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Genomic Medicine (Hwu), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Victor G Prieto
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Dermatology (Curry, Ivan, Prieto, Torres-Cabala), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Dermatology (Curry, Ivan, Prieto, Torres-Cabala), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Phyu P Aung
- From the Departments of Pathology (Cho, Wang, Nagarajan, Curry, Ivan, Lazar, Prieto, Torres-Cabala, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Thein KZ, Piha-Paul SA, Tsimberidou A, Karp DD, Janku F, Zarifa A, Shah J, Milton DR, Bean S, McQuinn L, Gong J, Colen R, Carter BW, Subbiah V, Ogbonna DC, Pant S, Meric-Bernstam F, Naing A. Selinexor in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: Results of an open-label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study. Invest New Drugs 2021; 39:1357-1365. [PMID: 33909232 PMCID: PMC8542012 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01119-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Background Selinexor, a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound inhibits Exportin-1(XPO1), had demonstrated synergistic activity with many chemotherapies and conferred in vivo antitumor efficacy in hematologic as well as solid tumors. Methods This open-label, single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study used a standard 3 + 3 design and a "basket type" expansion. Selinexor with intravenous topotecan was given in one of the 13 parallel arms. Patients with advanced or metastatic relapsed/refractory solid tumors following prior systemic therapy, or in whom the addition of selinexor to standard chemotherapy deemed appropriate, were eligible. Results Fourteen patients with the median age of 61 years (range, 22-68years) were treated, and the most common cancer types were gynecological cancers; ovarian (n = 5), endometrial (n = 2), and 1 each with fallopian tube and vaginal cancers. Of the 14 patients treated, 12 (86 %) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The most common TRAEs were anemia (71 %), thrombocytopenia (57 %), hyponatremia (57 %), vomiting (57 %), fatigue (50 %), nausea (50 %), and neutropenia (36 %). Two patients had dose limiting toxicities. One patient dosed at selinexor 80 mg had grade 3 nausea and vomiting and one patient dosed at selinexor 60 mg experienced grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Of the 13 efficacy evaluable patients, one (8 %) with endometrial cancer achieved unconfirmed partial response (uPR) and the time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 48 weeks, whereas 6 of the 13 (46 %) patients had stable disease (SD) contributing to the clinical benefit rate of 46 %. The median TTF for all patients was 9 weeks (range, 2-48weeks). Conclusions Once weekly selinexor in combination with topotecan was viable and showed some preliminary tumor efficacy. The recommend phase 2 dose of selinexor was 60 mg once weekly in combination with IV topotecan.Trial registration: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyaw Zin Thein
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University/ Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Sarina A Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Apostolia Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Daniel D Karp
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Abdulrazzak Zarifa
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jatin Shah
- Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stacie Bean
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Lacey McQuinn
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jing Gong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Rivka Colen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brett W Carter
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Deby C Ogbonna
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Shubham Pant
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics (Phase I Clinical Trials Program), Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Thein KZ, Karp DD, Tsimberidou A, Gong J, Sulovic S, Shah J, Milton DR, Hong DS, Janku F, McQuinn L, Stephen BA, Colen R, Carter BW, Yap TA, Piha-Paul SA, Fu S, Meric-Bernstam F, Naing A. Selinexor in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors: Results of a single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study. Invest New Drugs 2021; 40:290-299. [PMID: 34562230 PMCID: PMC8993773 DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01188-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background. Carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) is one of the standard chemotherapy regimens used in various tumor types. Preclinical models have suggested that selinexor, a first-in-class oral potent selective inhibitor of nuclear export Exportin-1, and CT exerts antitumor activity in multiple malignancies. Methods. This was a single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study utilizing a “basket type” expansion. CT and selinexor was employed as one of the 13 parallel arms. Advanced relapsed/refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or where the addition of selinexor to standard regimens deemed appropriate, were eligible. Results. Of 13 patients treated, 12 patients were evaluable for response. The most common cancers were breast (n = 4), esophageal (n = 2), ovarian (n = 2) and non-small cell lung cancers (n = 2). All 13 patients had at least one treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and the most common were neutropenia (85%), leukopenia (85%), thrombocytopenia (85%), anemia (69%), nausea (54%), vomiting (46%), and fatigue (46%). One patient at 60 mg QW experienced DLT with grade 3 nausea and vomiting lasting 3 days. Unconfirmed partial response (uPR) was observed in 3 patients; one patient each with esophageal, breast, and ovarian cancer. One patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma had confirmed PR, however, was discontinued from the study due to clinical progression. Five patients achieved stable disease (SD). Disease control rate was 8%. Majority of patients (77%), including two patients who had uPR, had prior exposure to carboplatin and/or paclitaxel. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) ranged from 1 to 153 weeks. Conclusion. The RP2D of selinexor was 60 mg QW in combination with CT. The combination conferred viable clinical activity with durable objective responses which should further be explored in tumor types for which CT is used as standard of care. Trial information. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics. (Trial registration: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyaw Z Thein
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA. .,Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Oregon Health and Science University/ Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, USA.
| | - Daniel D Karp
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Apostolia Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Gong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Selma Sulovic
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jatin Shah
- , Karyopharm Therapeutics, Newton, MA, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David S Hong
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Filip Janku
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Lacey McQuinn
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Bettzy A Stephen
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rivka Colen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brett W Carter
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy A Yap
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sarina A Piha-Paul
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Siqing Fu
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Funda Meric-Bernstam
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aung Naing
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Arrabi L, Jan A, Hosing C, Milton DR, Yeh J. Transitioning tacrolimus to sirolimus in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Eur J Haematol 2021; 107:634-641. [PMID: 34431142 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) prophylaxis in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) recipients has been associated with toxicities. Toxicities may be managed by converting CNI to sirolimus as often done in solid organ transplantation. This study aimed to characterize allo-HCT patients who completely transitioned from tacrolimus to sirolimus and evaluate the incidence of aGVHD within 100 days post-transition, overall survival (OS), and incidence of relapse. METHODS Safety and efficacy data were collected at baseline and at day 30 and 90 post-transition from tacrolimus to sirolimus and at one-year post-HCT. RESULTS Most patients who transitioned had acute leukemia, received a matched unrelated donor allo-HCT, and transitioned due to nephrotoxicity or neurotoxicity. The resolution rate was 83% and 48% in the nephrotoxicity group, 78% and 61% in the neurotoxicity group, 33% and 33% in the group that developed both nephrotoxicity and transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy at 30 and 90 days of assessments, respectively. Patients who transitioned before day 55 post-allo-HCT were more likely to develop new or worsening aGVHD. The one-year OS and relapse rates were 37% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus demonstrates promising resolution of acute toxicities; however, overall mortality remains high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Arrabi
- Department of Pharmacy, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Anna Jan
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jason Yeh
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Srour SA, Milton DR, Bashir Q, Nieto Y, Saini N, Daher M, Ramdial J, Im J, Hosing C, Delgado R, Manasanch E, Lee HC, Thomas S, Kaufman G, Patel K, Popat U, Weber D, Orlowski R, Shpall E, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Melphalan dose intensity for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2021; 106:3211-3214. [PMID: 34407606 PMCID: PMC8634193 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.279179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Samer A Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - May Daher
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jin Im
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ruby Delgado
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Elisabet Manasanch
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Sheeba Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Greg Kaufman
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Krina Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Donna Weber
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Robert Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Elizabeth Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Haymaker C, Johnson DH, Murthy R, Bentebibel SE, Uemura MI, Hudgens CW, Safa H, James M, Andtbacka RHI, Johnson DB, Shaheen M, Davies MA, Rahimian S, Chunduru SK, Milton DR, Tetzlaff MT, Overwijk WW, Hwu P, Gabrail N, Agrawal S, Doolittle G, Puzanov I, Markowitz J, Bernatchez C, Diab A. Tilsotolimod with Ipilimumab Drives Tumor Responses in Anti-PD-1 Refractory Melanoma. Cancer Discov 2021; 11:1996-2013. [PMID: 33707233 PMCID: PMC8544022 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Many patients with advanced melanoma are resistant to immune checkpoint inhibition. In the ILLUMINATE-204 phase I/II trial, we assessed intratumoral tilsotolimod, an investigational Toll-like receptor 9 agonist, with systemic ipilimumab in patients with anti-PD-1- resistant advanced melanoma. In all patients, 48.4% experienced grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events. The overall response rate at the recommended phase II dose of 8 mg was 22.4%, and an additional 49% of patients had stable disease. Responses in noninjected lesions and in patients expected to be resistant to ipilimumab monotherapy were observed. Rapid induction of a local IFNα gene signature, dendritic cell maturation and enhanced markers of antigen presentation, and T-cell clonal expansion correlated with clinical response. A phase III clinical trial with this combination (NCT03445533) is ongoing. SIGNIFICANCE: Despite recent developments in advanced melanoma therapies, most patients do not experience durable responses. Intratumoral tilsotolimod injection elicits a rapid, local type 1 IFN response and, in combination with ipilimumab, activates T cells to promote clinical activity, including in distant lesions and patients not expected to respond to ipilimumab alone.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1861.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cara Haymaker
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel H Johnson
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ravi Murthy
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Salah-Eddine Bentebibel
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marc I Uemura
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Courtney W Hudgens
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Houssein Safa
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marihella James
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert H I Andtbacka
- Surgical Oncology Department of Surgery, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Douglas B Johnson
- Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Montaser Shaheen
- Department of Medicine and Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona
| | - Michael A Davies
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Willem W Overwijk
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nashat Gabrail
- Department of Oncology, Gabrail Cancer Center, Canton, Ohio
| | - Sudhir Agrawal
- Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Gary Doolittle
- Department of Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Igor Puzanov
- Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Joseph Markowitz
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Chantale Bernatchez
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Adi Diab
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Mejbel HA, Torres-Cabala CA, Milton DR, Ivan D, Nagarajan P, Curry JL, Ciurea AM, Rubin AI, Hwu WJ, Prieto VG, Aung PP. Prognostic Significance of Subungual Anatomic Site in Acral Lentiginous Melanoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2020; 145:943-952. [PMID: 33290520 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0308-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Acral lentiginous melanoma is a rare and aggressive type of cutaneous melanoma that arises on the acral skin and the nail unit. The prognostic significance of subungual anatomic site in acral lentiginous melanoma is not established. OBJECTIVE.— To assess the impact of subungual anatomic site on overall survival and disease-specific survival in acral lentiginous melanoma. DESIGN.— Retrospective cohort analysis. Clinicopathologic characteristics of 627 primary acral lentiginous melanomas (45 [7%] subungual and 582 [93%] nonsubungual) were summarized, and the impact of these characteristics on overall survival and disease-specific survival was determined using univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS.— No significant differences in clinicopathologic features were identified between the subungual and nonsubungual acral lentiginous melanomas. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival rates were 81%, 40%, and 28%, respectively, for subungual acral lentiginous melanoma and 94%, 59%, and 38%, respectively, for nonsubungual acral lentiginous melanoma (P = .04); risk of death was significantly higher for subungual tumors (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] = 1.59 [1.02-2.50]; P = .04). The 1-, 5-, and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 94%, 56%, and 48%, respectively, for subungual acral lentiginous melanoma versus 96%, 69%, and 55%, respectively, for nonsubungual acral lentiginous melanoma (P = .18). By multivariable analysis, independent poor prognostic factors included older age and ulceration for overall survival and greater Breslow thickness and sentinel lymph node positivity for overall survival and disease-specific survival. Subungual anatomic site was not an independent prognostic factor for overall or disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS.— Subungual anatomic site is not an independent prognostic factor for acral lentiginous melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haider A Mejbel
- From the Department of Pathology (Mejbel, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Nagarajan, Curry, Prieto, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- From the Department of Pathology (Mejbel, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Nagarajan, Curry, Prieto, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Department of Dermatology (Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Curry, Ciurea, Prieto), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics (Milton), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Doina Ivan
- From the Department of Pathology (Mejbel, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Nagarajan, Curry, Prieto, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Department of Dermatology (Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Curry, Ciurea, Prieto), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Priyadharsini Nagarajan
- From the Department of Pathology (Mejbel, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Nagarajan, Curry, Prieto, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- From the Department of Pathology (Mejbel, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Nagarajan, Curry, Prieto, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Department of Dermatology (Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Curry, Ciurea, Prieto), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Ana M Ciurea
- Department of Dermatology (Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Curry, Ciurea, Prieto), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Adam I Rubin
- The Department of Dermatology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Rubin)
| | - Wen-Jen Hwu
- Melanoma Medical Oncology (Hwu), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Victor G Prieto
- From the Department of Pathology (Mejbel, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Nagarajan, Curry, Prieto, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.,Department of Dermatology (Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Curry, Ciurea, Prieto), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Phyu P Aung
- From the Department of Pathology (Mejbel, Torres-Cabala, Ivan, Nagarajan, Curry, Prieto, Aung), The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Milton DR, Lin SH, Hobbs BP. Comparing Radiation Modalities with Trimodality Therapy Using Total Toxicity Burden. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:1001-1005. [PMID: 32698967 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Steven H Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian P Hobbs
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Varma A, Sui D, Milton DR, Tang G, Saini N, Hasan O, Mukherjee A, Joseph JJ, Bashir Q, Rondon G, Srour S, Popat UR, Hosing CM, Nieto Y, Kebriaei P, Alousi AM, Ahmed S, Mehta R, Khouri IF, Ahmed H, Iyer S, Weber DM, Thomas SK, Manasanch E, Lee HC, Patel K, Ciurea SO, Shpall EJ, Orlowski RZ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Outcome of Multiple Myeloma with Chromosome 1q Gain and 1p Deletion after Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Propensity Score Matched Analysis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 26:665-671. [PMID: 31881283 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.12.726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2019] [Revised: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The gain/amplification CKS1B gene at chromosome region 1q21 (1q+) is one of the most common genetic aberrations in multiple myeloma (MM). Amplification of CKS1B is frequently associated with the deletion of the CDKN2C gene at chromosome region 1p32 (1p-), which is also associated with inferior outcomes. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the outcomes of patients with 1q+ and/or 1p- after high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). From January 2006 to December 2015, 1491 newly diagnosed patients with MM underwent upfront high-dose therapy and auto-HCT at our institution. Of those, 899 had the fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) data available. FISH was performed at diagnosis and before the start of induction in 686 (76%) patients and after the initiation of induction therapy in 213 (24%) patients. We identified 100 patients with 1q+ and/or 1p- by FISH from the cohort of 899 patients. A control group (n = 287) with diploid cytogenetics and normal FISH panel was selected from the same cohort. From the above 2 cohorts, using a propensity score matched analysis, we identified matched controls for 85 of the 100 patients with 1q+/1p-. Patients were matched for age at auto-HCT, sex, International Staging System stage, induction regimen, creatinine level, disease status at auto-HCT, conditioning regimen, and maintenance therapy. Sixty-seven (79%), 4 (5%), and 14 (16%) patients had 1q+, 1p-, or both 1q+ and 1p-, respectively. There was no significant difference in induction therapy, preparative regimen, or maintenance therapy between the 1q+/1p- and the control group. The median follow-up time for all patients was 29.2 months (range, 0.29 to 84.96). The cumulative incidence of 100-day nonrelapse mortality was 1.2% and 0% for the 1q+/1p- and the control group, respectively. Forty-two patients (50%) in the 1q+/1p- group achieved complete response compared with 40 patients (47%) in the control group. The estimated 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 41% and 79% for the 1q+/1p- group and 56% and 86% for the control group. Patients in the 1q+/1p- group were at significantly increased risk of progression or death compared to the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 2.21; confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 4.16; P = .014). No significant association between OS in the 2 groups was observed. The outcome of the 1q+/1p- alone (with no additional high-risk cytogenetics) and the propensity score matched control groups was also compared. Median PFS for the 1q+/1p- alone subgroup was 26.6 months, compared with 38.8 months for the control group (HR, 1.9; CI, 0.9 to 4.08; P = .09). The median OS had not been reached for the 1q+/1p- alone subgroup and was 81.1 months for the control group (HR, 1.25; CI, 0.3 to 4.6; P= .73). 1q+/1p- abnormalities with amplification of CKS1B and deletion ofCDKN2Cgenes were associated with shorter PFS compared with a propensity score matched group of patients with diploid cytogenetics and normal a FISH panel. The outcomes of 1q+/1p- patients with MM have improved with the use of more effective induction, conditioning, and maintenance therapy compared with historical controls, but we still need more effective therapeutic approaches to fully overcome the negative impact of 1q+/1p-.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur Varma
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Division of Hematology, Oncology and Cellular Therapy, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Dawen Sui
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Guilin Tang
- Department of Hematopathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Omar Hasan
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Akash Mukherjee
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jacinth Joy Joseph
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra M Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amin M Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Hematopathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rohtesh Mehta
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Issa F Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Haris Ahmed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Swaminathan Iyer
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Donna M Weber
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sheeba K Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elisabet Manasanch
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stefan O Ciurea
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Namikawa K, Aung PP, Milton DR, Tetzlaff MT, Torres-Cabala CA, Curry JL, Nagarajan P, Ivan D, Ross M, Gershenwald JE, Prieto VG. Correlation of Tumor Burden in Sentinel Lymph Nodes with Tumor Burden in Nonsentinel Lymph Nodes and Survival in Cutaneous Melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:7585-7593. [PMID: 31570567 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-1194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Revised: 08/02/2019] [Accepted: 09/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with cutaneous melanoma, metastasis in a nonsentinel lymph node (non-SLN) is a strong independent adverse prognostic factor. However, patients with a tumor-involved SLN no longer routinely undergo completion lymph node dissection (CLND). We hypothesized that SLN tumor burden may predict non-SLN tumor burden. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We compared tumor burden parameters between SLN and non-SLN in patients with cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLN biopsy with a positive SLN during 2003 to 2008 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. RESULTS We identified 336 eligible patients with a positive SLN. Of these, 308 (92%) underwent CLND, and 35 (10%) had non-SLN metastasis. The median follow-up time was 6.0 years. For patients with maximum diameter of tumor in the SLN ≤2.0 mm, >2.0-5.0 mm, and >5.0 mm, non-SLN metastasis was detected in 5 of 200 patients (3%), 10 of 63 patients (16%), and 20 of 57 patients (35%), and the mean maximum diameters of the non-SLN tumor deposits were 0.09, 1.56, and 2.71 mm, respectively (P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients with both subcapsular and intraparenchymal non-SLN tumor was higher for patients with SLN tumor in both locations than for patients with SLN tumor in only one location (P < 0.0001). Extranodal extension in a non-SLN was more common in patients with extranodal extension in an SLN (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS In patients with cutaneous melanoma who undergo CLND, SLN tumor burden predicts non-SLN tumor burden. SLN tumor burden parameters provide accurate prognostic stratification independent of non-SLN status and should be considered for incorporation into future staging systems and integrated risk models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenjiro Namikawa
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Dermatologic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Phyu P Aung
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carlos A Torres-Cabala
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jonathan L Curry
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Doina Ivan
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Merrick Ross
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jeffrey E Gershenwald
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Saini N, Ma J, Milton DR, Patel R, Varma A, Bashir Q, Delgado R, Mukherjee A, Rondon G, Popat UR, Hosing CM, Nieto Y, Kebriaei P, Alousi AM, Ahmed S, Tang G, Mehta R, Srour S, Khouri IF, Iyer S, Weber DM, Thomas SK, Lee HC, Manasanch EE, Patel KK, Orlowski RZ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Impact of Autologous Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma with t(11;14): A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis. Clin Cancer Res 2019; 25:6781-6787. [PMID: 31481508 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-19-0706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with multiple myeloma with t(11;14) have been considered to have standard-risk disease. However, several recent reports have shown contradictory results. We identified 95 patients with multiple myeloma with t(11;14) on FISH studies, who underwent upfront autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (auto-HCT) at our center. We compared their outcome with a group of standard-risk patients with multiple myeloma who had diploid cytogenetics by both conventional cytogenetics (CC) and FISH (n = 287). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN To reduce the bias between the groups, we performed a 1:1 propensity score matching technique for analysis. A total of 160 patients, 80 in each group, were identified. Patients in the 2 groups were matched for age, International staging system stage at diagnosis, serum creatinine at presentation, disease status at auto-HCT, type of preparative regimens, dose of melphalan used for conditioning, and induction and maintenance regimens. RESULTS Patients in t(11;14) group had a post auto-HCT overall response rate (ORR) of 97.5% (78/80), compared with 100% (80/80) in the standard-risk control group (P = 0.50). Complete response rate in the t(11;14) group was 35% (28/80), compared with 45% (36/80) in the standard-risk control group (P = 0.26). The 4-year PFS rates were 40.8% (95% CI, 29.6%-56.1%) and 51.1% (95% CI, 39.4%-66.3%) in the t(11;14) and standard-risk control groups, respectively (P = 0.14). The 4-year OS rates were 74.9% (95% CI, 63.3%-88.7%) and 88.3% (95% CI, 80.4%-97.0%) in the t(11;14) and standard-risk control groups, respectively (P = 0.17). Also, patients with t(11;14) with concurrent cytogenetics had significantly poor PFS and OS compared with a propensity matched standard-risk control group. CONCLUSIONS Our study confirms that t(11;14) multiple myeloma undergoing upfront autologous transplantation had similar outcomes as patients with multiple myeloma with normal cytogenetic and FISH studies. Existence of additional genomic aberrations by CC or FISH was associated with a worse outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Junsheng Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Romil Patel
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ankur Varma
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ruby Delgado
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Akash Mukherjee
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra M Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amin M Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Guilin Tang
- Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rohtesh Mehta
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Issa F Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Swaminathan Iyer
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Donna M Weber
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sheeba K Thomas
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hans C Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elisabet E Manasanch
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina K Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Z Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bashir Q, Chamoun K, Milton DR, Khan M, Ahmed S, Mehta R, Popat UR, Kebriaei P, Nieto Y, Oran B, Ciurea SO, Hosing C, Khouri I, Patel K, Manasanch EE, Lee HC, Orlowski RZ, Champlin RE, Qazilbash MH. Outcomes of autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation in myeloma patients aged ≥75 years. Leuk Lymphoma 2019; 60:3536-3543. [DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1633633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kamal Chamoun
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Denái R. Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maliha Khan
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rohtesh Mehta
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Uday R. Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stefan O. Ciurea
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Isa Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Krina Patel
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Hans C. Lee
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Z. Orlowski
- Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E. Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Muzaffar H. Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Figgins B, Hammerstrom A, Ariza-Heredia E, Oran B, Milton DR, Yeh J. Characterization of Viral Infections after Antithymocyte Globulin-Based Conditioning in Adults Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2019; 25:1837-1843. [PMID: 31128324 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) has been shown to reduce the incidence of graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) after matched related donor (MRD) and matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT); however, because of increased risks of infection and relapse, this use has not translated into a significant improvement in post-transplant survival. The goal of this single-center, retrospective cohort analysis was to quantify the incidence of viral reactivation and viral end-organ disease (EOD) within the first 100 days after MUD HCT with ATG-based conditioning compared with MRD HCT without ATG. Fifty-nine adult patients underwent ATG-based MUD HCT compared with 64 patients receiving MRD HCT without ATG. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was the most frequent event in both groups (65% MUD versus 61% MRD), followed by BK virus reactivation (26% versus 24%) and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation (20% versus 9%). A higher percentage of MUD patients experienced viral EOD by day +100 when compared with MRD patients (34% versus 16%, P = .022). This was most notable for EOD involving BK virus (15% versus 6%, P = .14) and Epstein-Barr virus (7% versus 0%, P = .050). Correspondingly, more patients in the MUD group experienced virus-related complications, including hospitalization (24% versus 3%, P < .001), intensive care unit admission (10% versus 6%, P = .19), and mortality (8% versus 4%, P = .44). There were no significant differences in either relapse-free survival (RFS; 62% versus 78%, P = .07) or overall survival (OS; 72% versus 86%, P = .07) at 6 months post-HCT. However, when using the final time point of 21 months in the MUD/ATG group and 23 months in the MRD/no ATG group, MUD patients who received ATG had inferior survival (OS: 27% versus 77%, P = .009; RFS: 40% versus 59%, P = .042). Our results add to and further quantify the infectious risks associated with the use of ATG in MUD transplants and promote the implementation of more intensive preemptive viral monitoring practices in patients receiving ATG-based MUD transplants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley Figgins
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Aimee Hammerstrom
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ella Ariza-Heredia
- Department of Infectious Diseases, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Denái R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jason Yeh
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Curry JL, Reuben A, Szczepaniak-Sloane R, Ning J, Milton DR, Lee CH, Hudgens C, George S, Torres-Cabala C, Johnson D, Subramanya S, Wargo JA, Mudaliar K, Wistuba II, Prieto VG, Diab A, Tetzlaff MT. Gene expression profiling of lichenoid dermatitis immune-related adverse event from immune checkpoint inhibitors reveals increased CD14 + and CD16 + monocytes driving an innate immune response. J Cutan Pathol 2019; 46:627-636. [PMID: 30883858 DOI: 10.1111/cup.13454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2018] [Revised: 03/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients receiving antibodies abrogating immune checkpoint pathways may develop a diverse array of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), of which lichenoid dermatitis (LD) is the most common. The mechanism driving the emergence of these irAEs remain understudied, underscoring a critical need to determine the unique gene expression profiles and immune composition in LD-irAE. METHODS LD-irAE (n = 3) and benign lichenoid keratosis (BLK) control (n = 3) were profiled with NanoString nCounter PanCancer Immune Profiling Panel interrogating the mRNA levels of 770 genes. Immunohistochemical (IHC) studies (n = 14 samples) for CD14, CD16, T-Bet, Gata-3, and FoxP3 were further evaluated using Aperio digital image analysis. RESULTS The LD-irAE showed downregulation of 93 mRNA transcripts (P < 0.05) and upregulation of 74 mRNA transcripts (P < 0.04) including toll-like receptor (TLR) 2 and TLR4 (P < 0.05). CD14+ and CD16+ monocytes quantified by IHC (H-score) were higher in LD-irAE than in the BLK control (P < 0.05). The immune composition of LD-irAE exhibited higher numbers of T-Bet+ (Th1) cells compared with Gata-3+ (Th2) cells (P = 0.016) and lower numbers of FoxP3 (T regulatory) cells (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS LD-irAE exhibited activation of CD14/TLR innate immune response with increased CD14+ and CD16+ monocytes compared with BLK control. CD14/TLR signaling may drive the development of LD-irAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan L Curry
- Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexandre Reuben
- Thoracic, Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Robert Szczepaniak-Sloane
- Surgical Oncology and Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Ning
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Denái R Milton
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chi H Lee
- Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Courtney Hudgens
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Saira George
- Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carlos Torres-Cabala
- Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel Johnson
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sandesh Subramanya
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer A Wargo
- Surgical Oncology and Genomic Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Victor G Prieto
- Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Dermatology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adi Diab
- Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael T Tetzlaff
- Pathology, Section of Dermatopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|