First-In-Human Phase I Study of Tinengotinib (TT-00420), a Multiple Kinase Inhibitor, as a Single Agent in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

This first-in-human phase I dose-escalation study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of tinengotinib (TT-00420), a multi-kinase inhibitor targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-3 (FGFRs 1-3), Janus kinase 1/2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, and Aurora A/B, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received tinengotinib orally daily in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation was guided by Bayesian modeling using escalation with overdose control. The primary objective was to assess dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose recommended for dose expansion (DRDE). Secondary objectives included pharmacokinetics and efficacy.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were enrolled (dose escalation, n = 40; dose expansion, n = 8). MTD was not reached; DRDE was 12 mg daily. DLTs were palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (8 mg, n = 1) and hypertension (15 mg, n = 2). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypertension (50.0%). In 43 response-evaluable patients, 13 (30.2%) achieved partial response (PR; n = 7) or stable disease (SD) ≥ 24 weeks (n = 6), including 4/11 (36.4%) with FGFR2 mutations/fusions and cholangiocarcinoma (PR n = 3; SD ≥ 24 weeks n = 1), 3/3 (100.0%) with hormone receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer (PR n = 2; SD ≥ 24 weeks n = 1), 2/5 (40.0%) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC; PR n = 1; SD ≥ 24 weeks n = 1), and 1/1 (100.0%) with castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC; PR). Four of 12 patients (33.3%; HR-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer, TNBC, prostate cancer, and cholangiocarcinoma) treated at DRDE had PRs. Tinengotinib's half-life was 28-34 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Tinengotinib was well tolerated with favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics. Preliminary findings indicated potential clinical benefit in FGFR inhibitor-refractory cholangiocarcinoma, HER2-negative breast cancer (including TNBC), and CRPC. Continued evaluation of tinengotinib is warranted in phase II trials.

Simultaneous submission of seven CTSA proposals: UM1, K12, R25, T32-predoctoral, T32-postdoctoral, and RC2: strategies, evaluation, and lessons learned

Translation is the process of turning observations in the research laboratory, clinic, and community into interventions that improve people's health. The Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program is a National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) initiative to advance translational science and research. Currently, 64 "CTSA hubs" exist across the nation. Since 2006, the Houston-based Center for Clinical Translational Sciences (CCTS) has assembled a well-integrated, high-impact hub in Texas that includes six partner institutions within the state, encompassing ∼23,000 sq. miles and over 16 million residents. To achieve the NCATS goal of "more treatments for all people more quickly," the CCTS promotes diversity and inclusion by integrating underrepresented populations into clinical studies, workforce training, and career development. In May 2023, we submitted the UM1 application and six "companion" proposals: K12, R25, T32-Predoctoral, T32-Postdoctoral, and RC2 (two applications). In October 2023, we received priority scores for the UM1 (22), K12 (25), T32-Predoctoral (20), and T32-Postdoctoral (23), which historically fall within the NCATS funding range. This report describes the grant preparation and submission approach, coupled with data from an internal survey designed to assimilate feedback from principal investigators, writers, reviewers, and administrative specialists. Herein, we share the challenges faced, the approaches developed, and the lessons learned.

A Phase I Trial of Bevacizumab and Temsirolimus in Combination With Valproic Acid in Advanced Solid Tumors

BACKGROUND

Preclinical models suggest synergy between anti-angiogenesis therapy, mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and histone deacetylase inhibitors to promote anticancer activity.

METHODS

This phase I study enrolled 47 patients between April 2012 and 2018 and determined safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) when combining bevacizumab, temsirolimus, and valproic acid in patients with advanced cancer.

RESULTS

Median age of enrolled patients was 56 years. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 lines of prior therapy. Forty-five patients (95.7%) experienced one or more treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Grade 3 TRAEs were lymphopenia (14.9%), thrombocytopenia (8.5%), and mucositis (6.4%). Grade 4 TRAEs included lymphopenia (2.1%) and CNS cerebrovascular ischemia (2.1%). Six patients developed DLTs across 10 dose levels with grade 3 infection, rash, mucositis, bowel perforation, elevated lipase, and grade 4 cerebrovascular ischemia. The MTD was dose level 9 (bevacizumab 5 mg/kg days 1 and 15 intravenously (IV) plus temsirolimus 25 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22 IV and valproic acid 5 mg/kg on days 1-7 and 15-21 per orally (PO)). Objective response rate (ORR) was 7.9% with confirmed partial response (PRs) in 3 patients (one each in parotid gland, ovarian, and vaginal cancers). Stable disease (SD) ≥+6 months was seen in 5 patients (13.1%). Clinical benefit state (CBR: PR + SD ≥+6 months) was 21%.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with bevacizumab, temsirolimus, and valproic acid was feasible, but there were numerous toxicities, which will require careful management for future clinical development (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01552434).

Safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab in treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In lung cancer, overexpression of nuclear export proteins can result in inactivation of critical tumor suppressor proteins and cell-cycle regulators. Selective suppression of nuclear export proteins has immunomodulatory activities. Here, clinical safety and early efficacy data are presented on the combination of pembrolizumab and an oral selective nuclear export inhibitor, selinexor, for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC).

METHODS

The primary objective of this prospective investigator-initiated study was to determine the safety and tolerability of selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with mNSCLC. Secondary objectives included determination of objective tumor response rate, disease control rate, and progression-free survival duration.

RESULTS

A total of 17 patients were included in the final analysis. Fifteen (88%) received more than two lines of prior systemic therapy and 10 (59%) had prior exposure to anti-PD-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. The median age was 67.5 years. Ten patients had grade ≥3 adverse events related to selinexor treatment. Responses to treatment occurred in patients who did and did not undergo previous anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and in patients with activating driver mutations. The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 11.4 months (95% CI, 3.4-19.8 months) and 3.0 months (95% CI, 1.7-5.7 months), respectively. The overall response rate was 18% and the 6-month disease control rate was 24%.

CONCLUSIONS

Selinexor in combination with pembrolizumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity in patients with mNSCLC, including those who had previously received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The therapy-related toxic effects were consistent with the prior safety data for both drugs, and no overlapping toxic effects were observed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02419495.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

New strategies to prevent or reverse resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors are under investigation. Selective inhibitors of nuclear export proteins, such as selinexor, can induce restoration of tumor-suppressing pathways and induce potent immunomodulatory activities. This article contains the clinical safety and early efficacy data on the combination of pembrolizumab and selinexor in treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

A phase I trial of the pan-ERBB inhibitor neratinib combined with the MEK inhibitor trametinib in patients with advanced cancer with EGFR mutation/amplification, HER2 mutation/amplification, HER3/4 mutation or KRAS mutation

PURPOSE

Aberrant alterations of ERBB receptor tyrosine kinases lead to tumorigenesis. Single agent therapy targeting EGFR or HER2 has shown clinical successes, but drug resistance often develops due to aberrant or compensatory mechanisms. Herein, we sought to determine the feasibility and safety of neratinib and trametinib in patients with EGFR mutation/amplification, HER2 mutation/amplification, HER3/4 mutation and KRAS mutation.

METHODS

Patients with actionable somatic mutations or amplifications in ERBB genes or actionable KRAS mutations were enrolled to receive neratinib and trametinib in this phase I dose escalation trial. The primary endpoint was determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic analysis and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled with a median age of 50.5 years and a median of 3 lines of prior therapy. Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities included: diarrhea (25%), vomiting (10%), nausea (5%), fatigue (5%) and malaise (5%). The MTD was dose level (DL) minus 1 (neratinib 160 mg daily with trametinib 1 mg, 5 days on and 2 days off) given 2 DLTs of grade 3 diarrhea in DL1 (neratinib 160 mg daily with trametinib 1 mg daily). The treatment-related toxicities of DL1 included: diarrhea (100%), nausea (55.6%) and rash (55.6%). Pharmacokinetic data showed trametinib clearance was significantly reduced leading to high drug exposures of trametinib. Two patients achieved stable disease (SD) ≥ 4 months.

CONCLUSION

Neratinib and trametinib combination was toxic and had limited clinical efficacy. This may be due to suboptimal drug dosing given drug-drug interactions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION ID

NCT03065387.

Discordance of HER2 Expression and/or Amplification on Repeat Testing

We sought to assess discordance of HER2 status in patients with HER2-amplified/expressing solid tumors who underwent reevaluation of HER2 status. Patients with metastatic solid tumors and HER2 expression by IHC or amplification by FISH/next-generation sequencing on local testing underwent central HER2 IHC/FISH testing with either archival or fresh biopsies and were evaluated for discordance in HER2 status. 70 patients (12 cancer types) underwent central HER2 reevaluation, including 57 (81.4%) with a new biopsy. In 30 patients with HER2 3+ on local IHC, 21 (70.0%) were 3+, 5 (16.7%) were 2+, 2 (6.7%) were 1+, and 2 (6.7%) had 0 HER2 expression on central IHC. In 15 patients whose cancers were 2+ on local IHC, 2 (13.3%) were 3+, 5 (33.3%) were 2+, 7 (46.7%) were 1+, and 1 (6.7%) had 0 HER2 expression on central IHC. HER2 discordance was seen in 16 of 52 (30.8%) of patients with HER2 overexpression/amplification who underwent a new image-guided biopsy. Discordance was observed in 10 (33.3%) of 30 patients who received intervening HER2-targeted therapy and in 6 (23.8%) of 22 patients who did not. In the 8 patients who had central HER2 assessment from the same archival block used for local testing, none were discordant. Discordance of HER2 status is common in patients with tumors previously identified as HER2-expressing, especially in patients with HER2 2+ tumors. Repeat biomarker evaluation may have value when considering HER2-targeted therapies.

Impact of Biomarker-Matched Therapies on Outcomes in Patients with Sarcoma Enrolled in Early-Phase Clinical Trials (SAMBA 101)

PURPOSE

Developing new therapeutics for any of the more than 100 sarcoma subtypes presents a challenge. After progression from standard therapies, patients with sarcoma may be referred for enrollment in early-phase trials. This study aimed to investigate whether enrollment in biomarker-matched early-phase clinical trials leads to better outcomes for patients with advanced sarcoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this retrospective analysis, investigational treatment characteristics and longitudinal survival outcomes were analyzed in patients with biopsy-confirmed sarcoma enrolled in early-phase trials at MD Anderson Cancer Center from May 2006 to July 2021.

RESULTS

Five hundred eighty-seven patients were included [405 soft tissue, 122 bone, 60 gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST); median of three prior lines of therapy]. Most common subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (17.2%), liposarcoma (14.0%), and GIST (10.2%). Molecular testing was available for 511 patients (87.1%); 221 patients (37.6%) were treated in matched trials. Overall response rate was 13.1% matched compared with 4.9% in unmatched (P < 0.001); the clinical benefit rate at 6 months was 43.9% vs. 19.9% (P < 0.001). Progression-free survival was longer for patients in matched trials (median, 5.5 vs. 2.4 months; P < 0.001), and overall survival was also superior for patients in matched trials (median, 21.5 vs. 12.3 months; P < 0.001). The benefit of enrollment in matched trials was maintained when patients with GIST were excluded from the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Enrollment in biomarker-matched early-phase trials is associated with improved outcomes in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic sarcoma. Molecular testing of tumors from patients with advanced sarcoma and enrollment in matched trials is a reasonable therapeutic strategy.

Phase 1b study of combined selinexor and eribulin for the treatment of advanced solid tumors and triple-negative breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Selinexor (KPT-330) is a potent inhibitor of exportin 1 (XPO1), in turn inhibiting tumor growth. Selinexor enhances the antitumor efficacy of eribulin in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in vitro and in vivo. Given the unmet medical need in TNBC and sarcoma, the authors explored the safety and efficacy of this combination.

METHODS

The authors conducted a phase 1b trial of combined selinexor and eribulin using a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design in patients who had advanced solid tumors and in those who had TNBC in a dose-expansion cohort.

RESULTS

Patients with TNBC (N = 19), sarcoma (N = 9), and other cancers (N = 3) were enrolled in the dose-escalation cohort (N = 10) and in the dose-expansion cohort (N = 21). The median number lines of prior therapy received was four (range, from one to seven prior lines). The most common treatment-related adverse events for selinexor were nausea (77%), leukopenia (77%), anemia (68%), neutropenia (68%), and fatigue (48%). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred at the first dose level with prolonged grade 3 neutropenia. The recommended phase 2 dose was 80 mg of selinexor orally once per week and 1 mg/m² eribulin on days 1 and 8 intravenously every 3 weeks. The objective response rate (ORR) was 10% in three patients. In the dose-escalation cohort, the ORR was 10%, whereas six patients with had stable disease. In the TNBC dose-expansion cohort (n = 18), ORR was 11%, and there were two confirmed partial responses with durations of 10.8 and 19.1 months (ongoing).

CONCLUSIONS

Selinexor and eribulin had an acceptable toxicity profile and modest overall efficacy with durable responses in select patients.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Effective therapies for advanced, triple-negative breast cancer and sarcoma represent an unmet need. Exportin 1 is associated with the transport of cancer-related proteins. Preclinical studies have demonstrated tumor growth inhibition and enhanced tumor sensitivity in patients who receive selinexor combined with eribulin. In this phase 1b study, the authors evaluated the safety profile and clinical activity of the combination of selinexor, a potent oral inhibitor of exportin 1, and eribulin in patients with advanced cancers enriched for triple-negative breast cancer or sarcoma. The combination was well tolerated; most adverse events were mild or moderate, reversible, and managed with dose modifications or growth factor support. The combination of selinexor and eribulin produced an antitumor response, particularly in some patients with triple-negative breast cancer. This work lays the foundation for prospective investigations of the role of selinexor and eribulin in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Abstract 6181: Dynamic changes in monocyte and reticulocyte counts predict mechanism-based anemia development and recovery during ATR inhibitor treatment in phase I/II trials

Introduction: Clinical trials are exploring ATR inhibitors (ATRi) in genomically selected contexts. However, dose-dependent anemia has limited the therapeutic index of this class. We hypothesized that monocytes and reticulocytes are more vulnerable to ATRi due to their lack of base excision repair and high levels of oxidative stress, respectively. We sought to examine the kinetics of decline and recovery of red blood cell (RBC) and reticulocyte indices, in relation to hemoglobin (Hb), in the first 28 days after ATRi initiation.

Methods: We retrospectively retrieved peripheral blood cell indices from complete blood count (CBC) reports of patients (pts) pre- and during treatment with an oral ATRi on phase I/II trials at our center. Pts received ATRi monotherapy or in combination with a PARP inhibitor (ATRi+PARPi) in dose-escalation and expansion cohorts, which included ATRi at potentially toxic doses. We applied linear mixed effect models to evaluate the joint evolution of Hb and other RBC or reticulocyte indices over time via bivariate analysis. A random intercept was included in the model to account for the longitudinal nature of the data and a variance component option for the covariance structure was specified to model a different variance component for each index of interest. To assess if Hb decline was preceded by decline in the index of interest from baseline, piecewise regression models were used to estimate break points, defined as the time point where the fitted functions intersect, of each index. Log transformed data with a base of 2, were noted to have more symmetric distributions, and were used in the analyses. The time variable assessed was days from cycle 1 day 1 of ATRi. A two-sided p value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: 35,007 indices from 1,843 CBC of 119 pts treated with an ATRi from 10/2017 to 1/2022 were analyzed. 110 (92.4%) pts received ATRi, 9 (7.6%) received ATRi+PARPi. Monocytes (-0.120 vs -0.022, p &lt;0.0001) and reticulocytes (-0.140 vs -0.022, p &lt;0.0001) declined at a faster rate compared with Hb. Time to monocyte and reticulocyte nadir after ATRi initiation was 8.9 and 5.8 days, respectively, while time to Hb nadir was 19.5 days. Conversely, RBC (-0.020 vs -0.023, p=0.410), MCV (-0.002 vs -0.022, p &lt;0.0001) and MCH (-0.001 vs -0.022, p&lt;0.0001) declined at a slower rate than Hb. Time to RBC, MCV and MCH nadir after ATRi initiation was 26.3, 18.7 and 15.0 days, respectively. After reaching their individual index nadir, monocytes (0.004 vs 0.001, p &lt;0.0001) and reticulocytes (0.005 vs 0.0005, p &lt;0.0001) increased more quickly than Hb.

Conclusions: Charting the kinetics of CBC index evolution in relation to Hb identified peripheral monocytes and reticulocytes as relevant blood indices that herald Hb decline. Our findings may inform patient monitoring strategies to mitigate hematologic toxicity on future ATRi trials.

Citation Format: Natalie Y. Ngoi, Heather Y. Lin, Ecaterina Dumbrava, Siqing Fu, Daniel D. Karp, Aung Naing, Shubham Pant, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Jordi Rodon, Vivek Subbiah, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Erick Campbell, Samuel Urrutia, David S. Hong, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Ying Yuan, Timothy A. Yap. Dynamic changes in monocyte and reticulocyte counts predict mechanism-based anemia development and recovery during ATR inhibitor treatment in phase I/II trials. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6181.

Multicenter Phase II Trial of the WEE1 Inhibitor Adavosertib in Refractory Solid Tumors Harboring CCNE1 Amplification

PURPOSE

Preclinical cancer models harboring CCNE1 amplification were more sensitive to adavosertib treatment, a WEE1 kinase inhibitor, than models without amplification. Thus, we conducted this phase II study to assess the antitumor activity of adavosertib in patients with CCNE1-amplified, advanced refractory solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 18 years with measurable disease and refractory solid tumors harboring CCNE1 amplification, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and adequate organ function were studied. Patients received 300 mg of adavosertib once daily on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12 of a 21-day cycle. The trial followed Bayesian optimal phase II design. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Thirty patients were enrolled. The median follow-up duration was 9.9 months. Eight patients had partial responses (PRs), and three had stable disease (SD) ≥ 6 months, with an ORR of 27% (95% CI, 12 to 46), a SD ≥ 6 months/PR rate of 37% (95% CI, 20 to 56), a median progression-free survival duration of 4.1 months (95% CI, 1.8 to 6.4), and a median overall survival duration of 9.9 months (95% CI, 4.8 to 15). Fourteen patients with epithelial ovarian cancer showed an ORR of 36% (95% CI, 13 to 65) and SD ≥ 6 months/PR of 57% (95% CI, 29 to 82), a median progression-free survival duration of 6.3 months (95% CI, 2.4 to 10.2), and a median overall survival duration of 14.9 months (95% CI, 8.9 to 20.9). Common treatment-related toxicities were GI, hematologic toxicities, and fatigue.

CONCLUSION

Adavosertib monotherapy demonstrates a manageable toxicity profile and promising clinical activity in refractory solid tumors harboring CCNE1 amplification, especially in epithelial ovarian cancer. Further study of adavosertib, alone or in combination with other therapeutic agents, in CCNE1-amplified epithelial ovarian cancer is warranted.

A phase 2 study of immunogenic cell death inducer PT-112 in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

TPS292

Background: PT-112 is a novel small I-O molecule currently in development for several cancers. Preclinical studies have shown the robust induction of immunogenic cell death by PT-112, leading to an anti-cancer adaptive immune response. Biodistribution experiments in mice showed PT-112’s partial bone affinity. In two prior phase I studies, late-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients (mCRPC pts) were treated with evidence of anti-cancer activity, including tumor volume reductions, improvements in PET and bone scans, PSA and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) reductions, and anecdotal cases of improvement in disease-related pain. This, taken together with the immunogenic and osteotropic properties observed in preclinical work, provided a strong rationale to further explore PT-112 in mCRPC, an immunologically “cold” disease with a high prevalence of bone metastases. Moreover, in an analysis of >6,000 mCRPC pts, circulating tumor cell (CTC) declines (CTC0 and CTC conversions) were correlated with improvements in survival to a greater extent than PSA declines (PSA50) (Heller et al., JCO, 36:6 2017), prompting incorporation of CTC changes as a secondary endpoint. Methods: The primary objective of the study is to define the dose regimen of PT-112 for pivotal study. Pts are randomized to one of three arms, receiving IV PT-112 on 28-day cycles via one hour infusions on (1) Days 1 and 15 at 250 mg/m2, (2) Days 1 and 15 at 360 mg/m2, or (3) Days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 at 360 mg/m2 followed by 250 mg/m2 on Day 15 of subsequent cycles. Key eligibility criteria include radiographically progressive disease at study entry; ≥3 life-prolonging therapies for metastatic disease including 1-2 taxanes, ≥1 new generation anti-androgen therapies, and other drugs FDA approved on the basis of survival; and allowing bone-only metastatic disease. Efficacy assessments comprise disease control rate at 4 months (DCR4) using RECIST and PCWG3 criteria, objective response rate, CTC0 and CTC conversion, PSA50 and ALP reductions. Additionally, T cell receptor sequencing is conducted to characterize treatment-induced changes in T cell fraction and clonal expansions, as a means of generating meaningful supportive data on the immune mechanism of PT-112 monotherapy. A Fleming two-stage design will be used to assess each arm, with a 20% DCR4 as the null hypotheses, requiring ≥6 of 25 pts responding in stage one and ≥14 of 45 in total to reject the null. In addition, other efficacy measures, such as CTC responses, as well as exposure/response and exposure/safety analyses will be applied to characterize the risk/benefit ratio and select the optimal dose regimen for PT-112. As of October 11th, 2022, 38 pts have been enrolled out of a planned maximum of 135. Clinical trial information: NCT02266745 .

Long COVID in cancer patients: preponderance of symptoms in majority of patients over long time period

Background

An increasing number of observational studies have reported the persistence of symptoms following recovery from acute COVID-19 disease in non-cancer patients. The long-term consequences of COVID-19 are not fully understood particularly in the cancer patient population. The purpose of this study is to assess post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC) in cancer patients following acute COVID-19 recovery.

Methods

We identified cancer patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who were diagnosed with COVID-19 disease between March 1, 2020, and September 1, 2020, and followed them till May 2021. To assess PASC, we collected patients reported outcomes through questionnaires that were sent to patients daily for 14 days after COVID-19 diagnosis then weekly for 3 months, and then monthly thereafter. We also reviewed patients' electronic medical records to capture the persistence or emergence of new COVID19-related symptoms reported during any clinic or hospital encounter beyond 30 days of the acute illness and up to 14 months.

Results

We included 312 cancer patients with a median age of 57 years (18-86). The majority of patients had solid tumors (75%). Of the 312 patients, 188 (60%) reported long COVID-19 symptoms with a median duration of 7 months and up to 14 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. The most common symptoms reported included fatigue (82%), sleep disturbances (78%), myalgias (67%), and gastrointestinal symptoms (61%), followed by headache, altered smell or taste, dyspnea (47%), and cough (46%). A higher number of females reported a persistence of symptoms compared to males (63% vs. 37%; p=0.036). Cancer type, neutropenia, lymphocytopenia, and hospital admission during acute COVID-19 disease were comparable in both groups. Among the 188 patients with PASC, only 16 (8.5%) were re-admitted for COVID-related reasons.

Conclusions

More than one out of two cancer patients, and more likely females, report PASC that may persist beyond 6 months and even 1 year. The most common symptoms are non-respiratory and consist of fatigue, sleep disturbance, myalgia, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Most of the cancer patients with PASC were managed on outpatient basis with only 8.5% requiring a COVID-19-related re-admission.

Funding

This research is supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA016672, which supports the MD Anderson Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Predictors of Oncologic Outcome in Patients Receiving Phase I Investigational Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Cervical Cancer

Introduction

We aimed to identify clinical, pathologic, and treatment factors that are predictive of response and survival in patients with cervical cancer referred to phase I clinical trials.

Methods

Patients with cervical cancer who received at least one dose of a phase I investigational agent at our institution between 2014 and 2022 were included. The log-rank test was used to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and multivariable regression analysis was performed.

Results

We included 65 patients with a median age of 41 years (range, 20-74), 3 prior therapies (range, 1-7), and 67.7% squamous carcinoma. The rate of distant metastasis at trial entry was 84.6%. The most common molecular alterations included PIK3CA (46.5%), PD-L1+ (46.2%), EPH (30.0%), and CREBBP (23.1%); 23.1% had received a prior checkpoint inhibitor. Phase I trials were for immunotherapy (58.5%) or targeted therapy (41.5%). The rate of biomarker matching was 21.5%. For all patients, median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.0-5.2) and OS was 9.3 months (95% CI, 7.0-10.6). Factors at study entry associated with worse survival were presence of bone metastasis (PFS 1.6 vs 4.4 months: hazard ratio [HR], 2.8; p = 0.001; OS 3.8 vs 10.0 months: HR, 3.9; p < 0.0001) and absolute lymphocyte count below 1000/μL (PFS 1.8 vs 5.2 months: HR, 2.9; p = 0.0004; OS 7.0 vs 10.6 months: HR, 3.2; p = 0.0009). Factors associated only with worse OS were absolute neutrophil count above 4700/μL, hemoglobin below 10.5 g/dL, and smoking status. Grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events were seen in 16.9% of cases.

Conclusion

Bone metastasis and absolute lymphocyte count below normal range at phase I study entry portend poor survival in patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer.

Complex I inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation in advanced solid tumors and acute myeloid leukemia: phase I trials

Although targeting oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is a rational anticancer strategy, clinical benefit with OXPHOS inhibitors has yet to be achieved. Here we advanced IACS-010759, a highly potent and selective small-molecule complex I inhibitor, into two dose-escalation phase I trials in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (NCT02882321, n = 17) and advanced solid tumors (NCT03291938, n = 23). The primary endpoints were safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of IACS-010759. The PK, PD, and preliminary antitumor activities of IACS-010759 in patients were also evaluated as secondary endpoints in both clinical trials. IACS-010759 had a narrow therapeutic index with emergent dose-limiting toxicities, including elevated blood lactate and neurotoxicity, which obstructed efforts to maintain target exposure. Consequently no RP2D was established, only modest target inhibition and limited antitumor activity were observed at tolerated doses, and both trials were discontinued. Reverse translational studies in mice demonstrated that IACS-010759 induced behavioral and physiological changes indicative of peripheral neuropathy, which were minimized with the coadministration of a histone deacetylase 6 inhibitor. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the association between OXPHOS inhibition and neurotoxicity, and caution is warranted in the continued development of complex I inhibitors as antitumor agents.

Patient-reported symptom burden in patients with rare cancers receiving pembrolizumab in a phase II Clinical Trial

Patients with rare solid tumors treated on early phase trials experience toxicities from their tumors and treatments. However, limited data exist to describe the detailed symptom burden suffered by these patients, particularly those with rare solid tumors treated with immunotherapy. We performed a prospective longitudinal study to capture patient-reported symptom burden. Patients completed the validated MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI)—Immunotherapy with 20 symptoms including 7 immunotherapy-specific items and 6 interference items at baseline and weekly thereafter for up to 9 weeks. Symptoms and interference were rated on 0–10 scales (0 = none or no interference, 10 = worst imaginable or complete interference). Group-based trajectory modelling determined higher and lower symptom groups. A total of 336 MDASI questionnaires were completed by 53 patients (mean age 55.4y, 53% male) with advanced rare cancers receiving pembrolizumab in a Phase II clinical trial. Symptoms reported as most severe over the course of the treatment over 9 weeks were fatigue [mean (M) = 3.8, SD = 2.3], pain (M = 3.7, SD = 2.9), disturbed sleep (M = 2.7, SD = 2.3), drowsiness (M = 2.6, SD = 2.0) and lack of appetite (M = 2.5, SD = 2.1). Pain in the abdomen (M = 2.2, SD = 2.4), rash (M = 1.1, SD = 1.8) and diarrhea (M = 0.9, SD = 1.5) were less severe. Interference with walking was rated the highest (M = 3.4, SD = 2.8) and relations with others was rated the lowest (M = 2.1, SD = 2.6). Using a composite score based on the five most severe symptoms (fatigue, pain, lack of appetite, feeling drowsy and sleep disturbance), 43% were classified into the high symptom burden group. Using a score based on immunotherapy-specific symptoms (e.g., rash, diarrhea) 33% of patients were included in the high symptom group. Symptom burden stayed relatively stable in the high- and low-symptom burden patient groups from baseline through 9 weeks. Some patients with rare malignancies experienced high symptom burden even at baseline. In patients with rare cancers, symptom trajectories stayed relatively stable over nine weeks of treatment with pembrolizumab.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02721732.

Phase I study of PT-112, a novel pyrophosphate-platinum immunogenic cell death inducer, in advanced solid tumours

BACKGROUND

PT-112, the first pyrophosphate-platinum conjugate, causes immunogenic cell death in experimental models, leading to recruitment of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes. PT-112 also associates with bone (osteotropism), likely driven by its pyrophosphate moiety. This is the first-in-human study of PT-112 monotherapy, exploring its safety and efficacy in a patient population where standard of care therapies were exhausted and novel treatment options are needed.

METHODS

Patients with progressing, advanced solid tumours received PT-112 intravenously (1 h) on days 1, 8, 15 of a 28-day cycle in an open-label, multi-centre 3 + 3 dose-escalation trial, conducted at four US research sites. The primary objective was to assess safety and pharmacokinetics, and to identify a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Eligibility criteria included: age ≥18 years, Eastern Collaborative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-1, and disease evaluable by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1·1 or by informative tumour markers. Patients receiving ≥1 dose of PT-112 were included in the safety and pharmacokinetic analyses, with the exploratory efficacy analysis including patients receiving ≥1 dose at 125 mg/m². This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02266745, with the dose-escalation portion of the study closed.

FINDINGS

Between July 7th, 2014 and September 18th, 2018, 66 heavily pre-treated patients (median 4 prior lines, IQR 2-6) were enrolled and treated across 11 doses (12-420 mg/m²). Treatment-related adverse events included fatigue (23 patients, 35%), nausea (16 patients, 24%), and peripheral neuropathy (14 patients, 21%). Grade 3 events were experienced by 18 patients (27%), with no grade 4-5 events observed. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 360 mg/m². Nine (17%) of the 54 efficacy evaluable patients achieved progression-free survival ≥6 months. Durable partial responses were induced in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and thymoma. Radiographic and serum marker reductions were observed among ten patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, four of whom survived two years or longer.

INTERPRETATION

PT-112 is safe and well-tolerated in a heavily pre-treated population. Prolonged responses were noted against thymoma and lung cancer, along with radiographic and serum marker improvement in prostate cancer. Given the heterogeneous patient population, subsequent studies will be needed to characterize the risk/benefit ratio in more homogenous settings. Further development of PT-112 is ongoing, as single-agent and in combination with immune checkpoint inhibition.

FUNDING

Funding was provided by Promontory Therapeutics Inc.

Longitudinal Monitoring of Circulating Tumor DNA to Predict Treatment Outcomes in Advanced Cancers

PURPOSE

The response to cancer therapies is typically assessed with radiologic imaging 6-10 weeks after treatment initiation. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), however, has a short half-life, and dynamic changes in ctDNA quantity may allow for earlier assessment of the therapeutic response.

METHODS

Patients with advanced solid tumors referred to the Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were invited to participate in a liquid biopsy protocol for which serial blood samples were collected before, during, and after systemic therapy. We isolated ctDNA from serially collected plasma samples at baseline, mid-treatment, and first restaging. Genomically informed droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was performed, and ctDNA quantities were reported as aggregate variant allele frequencies for all detected molecular aberrations.

RESULTS

We included 204 patients receiving 260 systemic therapies. The ctDNA detection rate was higher in progressors (patients with progressive disease) compared with nonprogressors (patients with stable disease, partial responses, or complete responses) at all time points (P < .009). Moreover, ctDNA detection was associated with a shorter median time-to-treatment failure (P ≤ .001). Positive delta and slope values for changes in ctDNA quantity were more frequent in progressors (P ≤ .03 and P < .001, respectively) and were associated with a shorter median time-to-treatment failure (P ≤ .014 and P < .001, respectively). Increasing ctDNA quantity was predictive of clinical and/or radiologic progressive disease in 73% of patients (median lead time, 23 days).

CONCLUSION

Detection of ctDNA and early dynamic changes in its quantity can predict the clinical outcomes of systemic therapies in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Abstract 1588: Discordance of HER2 expression and/or amplification on repeat testing

Purpose: Evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression/amplification status is critical when considering HER2-targeted therapies. We sought to assess discordance of HER2 status in patients with HER2-amplified/expressing solid tumors who underwent a repeat biopsy for pre-trial screening.

Methods: Consenting patients with solid tumors and documented HER2 expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization/next generation sequencing (FISH/NGS) on historical local testing underwent a new biopsy for central reevaluation of HER2 status. Samples were assessed for HER2 expression by IHC and ERBB2 amplification by FISH. Specimens were reviewed by a central laboratory. Patients with HER2 overexpression by IHC (3+) or ERBB2 amplification by FISH/NGS on local testing were assessed for HER2 discordance on central testing (not amplified by FISH and/or not 3+ by IHC on central reevaluation).

Results: 56 patients with HER2 expression/amplification on local testing with a median age of 59.5 years and 30 (53.6%) females underwent biopsy and repeat HER2 testing. Median time between consent and treatment for those enrolled was 26 days (range 8-83 days). Twelve cancers were represented, including 12 breast (21.4%), 6 gastroesophageal (10.7%), and 6 biliary tract (10.7%). 31 patients (55.4%) received HER2-targeted therapies between local and central testing. Local assessment of HER2 status on archival tissue was performed in 36 (64.3%) patients by IHC, 27 (48.2%) by FISH, and 18 (32.1%) by NGS. There were 23 patients who were IHC 3+ on local testing and of these, 15 (65.2%) were 3+, 4 (17.4%) were 2+ (3 FISH +), 2 (8.7%) were 1+ (FISH-), and 2 (8.7%) had 0 HER2 expression on central IHC. Of 4 patients that were 2+ without amplification on local testing, 3 were 2+ and 1 was 1+ on central IHC. In 18 patients with ERBB2 amplification on local NGS, 14 (77.8%) were 3+ on central IHC and 17 (94.4%) were ERBB2 amplified by FISH. Of the 51 patients who were 3+ by IHC or amplified by FISH/NGS on local testing, 14 (27.5%) were discordant on central reevaluation. Discordance in HER2 status was found in 5/12 (41.7%) gastroesophageal, 2/9 (22.2%) breast, and 1/7 (14.3%) colorectal tumors. Discordant HER2 status was observed in 9 (30.0%) of 30 cases who received intervening HER2-targeted therapy and in 5 (23.8%) of 21 patients who did not. Of 14 patients with HER2 discordance, 7 were potentially eligible for trial enrollment based on local testing but ineligible based on central HER2 testing.

Conclusions: Discordance in HER2 status on repeat biopsy is not infrequent in patients with tumors previously identified as HER2-positive/expressing. Discordance is not limited to patients with prior HER2-targeted therapy and could have therapeutic implications. Biomarker reevaluation may be warranted when considering HER2-targeted therapies but needs to be balanced with a slight delay in treatment initiation.

Citation Format: Timothy D. DiPeri, Kathleen Kong, Daniel D. Karp, Jaffer A. Ajani, Shubham Pant, Sarina A. Piha-Payl, Ecaterina E. Dumbrava, Funda Meric-Bernstam. Discordance of HER2 expression and/or amplification on repeat testing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1588.

Baseline predictors of hematological toxicity in patients with advanced cancer treated with ATR inhibitors in phase I/II clinical trials

3111

Background: Ongoing trials are exploring ATR inhibitors (ATRi) in genomically selected contexts. However, myelosuppression, particularly anemia, has limited the therapeutic window of this class of drugs. We sought to discover clinical biomarkers predicting severe hematological toxicity from ATRi. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical parameters and peripheral blood cell indices retrieved from complete blood count (CBC) reports of patients (pts) pre- and during treatment with an oral ATRi on phase I/II trials at our center. Pts received ATRi monotherapy or in combination with a PD1 inhibitor (PD1i) or a PARP inhibitor (ATRi+PARPi) in dose-escalation and expansion cohorts, which included ATRi at potentially toxic doses. Results: 37553 indices from 2209 CBC reports of 141 pts treated with an ATRi from 10/2017 to 1/2022 were analyzed. 132 (93.6%) pts received ATRi +/- PD1i; 9 (6.4%) pts received ATRi+PARPi. The incidences of ≥ grade (G) 3 anemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were 47.5%, 31.9% and 11.4%. 73/141 (51.8%) pts received red cell transfusion. Baseline risk factors predicting ≥G3 anemia on univariate analysis included: lower median (med) hematocrit (Hct) (hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval) = 3.05 (1.82, 5.13) ≤med vs > med; p < 0.0001), hemoglobin (Hb) (HR = 2.74 (1.64,4.57) ≤med vs > med; p = 0.0001), mean corpuscular Hb concentration (HR = 1.85 (1.11,3.10) ≤med vs > med; p = 0.019); and higher median immature reticulocyte fraction (HR = 0.43 (0.25,0.71) ≤med vs > med; p = 0.0012), reticulocyte count (ct) (HR = 0.59 (0.35,0.97) ≤med vs > med; p = 0.037) and red cell distribution width (RDW) (HR = 0.54 (0.33,0.88) ≤med vs > med; p = 0.015). On multivariate analysis, lower median Hct (HR = 3.76 (2.15, 6.6) ≤med vs > med; p < 0.0001), higher immature granulocyte ct (HR = 1.71 (1.30, 2.25) per 1 fold increase; p = 0.0001), higher RDW (HR = 7.83 (1.70, 36.03) per 1 fold increase; p = 0.0082) and higher ATRi starting dose (HR = 1.40 (1.05, 1.86) per 1 fold increase; p = 0.022) significantly predicted ≥G3 anemia risk. Baseline risk factors for ≥G3 neutropenia on univariate analysis included: lower median absolute neutrophil ct (ANC) (HR = 2.26 (1.18, 4.33) ≤med vs > med; p = 0.015) or white blood cell ct (WBC) (HR = 2.73 (1.40, 5.33) ≤med vs > med; p = 0.0032). On multivariate analysis, lower median WBC (HR = 2.85 (1.45, 5.59) ≤med vs > med; p = 0.0024) was associated with higher risk of neutropenia, while ATRi+PARPi increased risk of neutropenia (ANC < 0.75) (HR = 4.15 (1.40, 12.3); p = 0.01) and thrombocytopenia (HR = 3.90 (1.47, 10.4); p = 0.0064). Conclusions: ≥G3 anemia was frequent in pts receiving ATRi. At baseline, lower median Hct and higher RDW predict severe anemia, while lower WBC predicts neutropenia from ATRi. ATRi+PARPi has increased risk of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia vs ATRi +/- PD1i. These indices may inform patient selection and CBC monitoring for future ATRi trials.

First-in-human, phase I study of TT-00420, a multiple kinase inhibitor, as a single agent in advanced solid tumors

3013

Background: TT-00420 is a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor that targets cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune-oncology pathways by inhibiting Aurora kinases A/B and Janus kinases (JAK) involved in cytokine signaling and receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFRs and VEGFRs) involved in the tumor microenvironment. TT-00420 has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical models of solid tumors, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: This phase I, first-in-human, dose escalation and expansion study of TT-00420 ( NCT03654547 ) enrolled adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Capsules in 1 mg or 5 mg formulation were administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation was guided by Bayesian modeling with overdose control. The primary safety endpoints were to determine dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and a dose recommended for dose expansion (DRDE). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy evaluated per RECIST v1.1 criterion. Results: As of February 7, 2022, 48 advanced solid tumor patients were enrolled in the study, and received at least one dose of TT-00420 in 7 dose levels: 1 mg q.d. (N = 1), 3 mg q.d. (N = 1), 5 mg q.d. (N = 4), 8 mg q.d. (N = 10), 10 mg q.d. (N = 6), 12 mg q.d. (N = 20), and 15 mg q.d. (N = 6). DLTs were observed in 3 out of 40 DLT-evaluable patients, including 1 patient at 8 mg q.d. who had Grade (Gr) 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome and 2 patients at 15 mg q.d. who both had Gr 3 hypertension. Among the twenty (20) safety evaluable patients treated at 12 mg, the DRDE, drug-related TEAEs included hypertension (n = 11, 55.0%; Gr 3: n = 6, 30%); diarrhea (n = 7, 35%, Gr 3: n = 1, 5%); mucosal inflammation (n = 7, 35%; Gr 3: n = 1, 5%); palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (n = 6, 30%; Gr 3: n = 0, 0%); and vomiting (n = 4, 20%; Gr 3: n = 0, 0%). No grade 4 suspected adverse events were reported. Out of 42 patients who had at least one post-baseline scan, 7 (16.7%) had a best response of partial response (PR) and 22 (52.4%) had stable disease (SD). Among 7 PRs, 3 were CCA patients (one for each treated at 8 mg, 10 mg, or 12 mg), 2 were TNBC patients (one for each at 10 mg, or 12 mg), 1 was HER2-negative BC patient at 12 mg, and 1 was CRPC patient at 12 mg. Sustainable stable disease for six months or longer was observed in patients with colon cancer (n = 1), head and neck cancer (n = 1), and peritoneal mesothelioma (n = 1). Conclusions: TT-00420 monotherapy was well tolerated and had favorable PK characteristics. The TEAEs observed in dose escalation and dose expansion cohorts were manageable with concomitant treatment and/or dose interruptions of TT-00420 and reversible upon the discontinuation of TT-00420 treatment. Taking safety, efficacy and clinical PK into consideration, 10 mg p.o. q.d. was recommended for phase II study of TT-00420 in patients with advanced CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT03654547.

Phase Ib trial of selinexor (SEL) in combination with nivolumab (NIVO) alone or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) in patients (pts) with advanced malignancies: The renal cell carcinoma (RCC) experience

4551

Background: SEL is a first-in-class nuclear exportin 1 inhibitor, which blocks the transport of several proteins involved in cancer-cell growth from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. A syngeneic RENCA mouse model showed that SEL combined with checkpoint blockade resulted in increased effector and activated T cells, and NKT cells and reductions in myeloid cells and Tregs. We hypothesized that SEL+NIVO and SEL+NIVO+IPI are well tolerated and improve the overall response rate (ORR) observed with anti-PD1/CTLA-4. Methods: NCT02419495 is an open label, single center phase IB study of SEL with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy regimens in pts with advanced malignancies using 3 + 3 design in dose escalation. For SEL+NIVO+IPI, SEL was 60 mg (N = 4) or 80 mg (N = 6) given P.O. weekly with NIVO 3 mg/kg x 4 cycles then 480 mg Q4W plus IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W for 4 cycles only. For SEL+NIVO, SEL was 40 mg twice a week (N = 8), or 60 mg twice a week (N = 11) given with NIVO 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W. Primary objective was to establish the safety and tolerability of SEL+NIVO and SEL+NIVO+IPI. Secondary objectives included ORR and progression free survival (PFS). Results: 29 pts with RCC (25 males) were enrolled (table), including 3 pts with nonclear cell RCC (nccRCC), with a median age of 64 years (IQR 56-69). 21 patients (72%) had prior systemic therapies. Most common SEL or NIVO/IPI treatment-related ≥ grade (G) 3 adverse events (AEs) included endocrine disorders (N = 3), hyponatremia (N = 3), leukopenia (N = 3), transaminitis (N = 3), thromboemobolic events (N = 2), asymptomatic lipase increased (N = 2), anemia (N = 1), pneumonitis (N = 1), nephritis (N = 1), colitis (N = 1), fatigue (N = 1). Two pts discontinued therapy due to AEs (G3 pneumonitis from SEL+NIVO+IPI and G3 transaminitis from SEL+NIVO, respectively). At a median follow up of 17.5 months, 5 (17%) pts achieved a PR, and 17 (59%) achieved a stable disease (SD). The median PFS for the entire cohort was 17.5 months (SEL+NIVO+IPI: 7.2 months, SEL+NIVO: 17.5 months). Among the patients with clear cell RCC who received SEL+NIVO+IPI as first line (1L) therapy (N = 4), all (100%) achieved SD as best overall response. Among the patients with ccRCC who received SEL+NIVO as 1L (N = 2), one patient achieved confirmed PR and the other achieved SD. The median overall survival (OS) was 27.8 months (SEL+NIVO+IPI: unreached, SEL+NIVO: 21.3 months). Conclusions: Treatment with SEL in combination with NIVO or NIVO+IPI is well-tolerated and shows modest clinical activity as compared to historic NIVO or NIVO+IPI activity. Clinical trial information: NCT02419495.

Phase Ib study of selinexor and eribulin combination in advanced solid tumors and triple-negative breast cancer

3108

Background: Selinexor (KPT-330) is potent inhibitor of Exportin-1. In vitro, Selinexor was found to be synergistic with eribulin in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines and enhanced antitumor activity of eribulin in TNBC patient-derived xenografts (PMID 28810913). Methods: We conducted a phase Ib trial in combination of selinexor and eribulin using 3 + 3 design in dose escalation for patients with advanced solid tumors and in TNBC in dose expansion cohort. Eribulin could be discontinued after combination for 6 cycles at physician discretion. Primary objectives: Safety, Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D). Secondary Objectives: Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DOR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS). Results: 31 patients, TNBC (n = 19), sarcoma (n = 8), others (n = 4) enrolled in dose escalation (n = 10) and dose expansion phases (n = 21). Median prior therapies:4 (1–6). Study initiated selinexor at 60mg twice weekly and eribulin 1.4mg/m2 on Day1, Day8 every 3 weeks which led to 1 Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) and hence, selinexor 80mg once weekly and eribulin 1mg/m2 was elected as RP2D due to efficacy and tolerability. As of 01/15/2022, of 29 patients (94%) who have discontinued treatment, 24 (77%) were due to progressive disease, 3 (10%) withdrew consent and 2 (6%) due to toxicities (G1 pneumonitis; G3 neutropenia) while 2 (6%) remain on trial. All 31 patients had at least one treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) while most prevalent TEAEs (all grades) were leukopenia (77%), nausea (71%), anemia and neutropenia (68%) and fatigue (48%). The most common G3/4 TEAE were leukopenia (26%) and neutropenia (29%). 2 DLTs occurred; 1 in first dose level (DL); 1 in second DL dosed at selinexor 80 mg once weekly due to G3 neutropenia. ORR for all was 10% while DCR (SD+PR+CR) > 6 months seen in 3 (15%) TNBC and 2 (20%) sarcoma patients. The median OS and PFS for all were 12.3 (7.3, 27.3) months and 2.3 (1.6, 4.1) months. In dose escalation cohort, ORR was 10% where one patient (3%) with vaginal SCC had confirmed PR (-44%) for 2.1 months. Five patients (62.5%) with sarcoma had stable disease (SD). One patient with high grade sarcoma has SD for 68 months and remains on selinexor after 4 months of eribulin and selinexor. In TNBC dose expansion (n = 19), ORR was 10.5% with 2 confirmed PRs and median duration of response (DOR) of 10.8 months. One patient who has remained on treatment for 18 months, and after receiving 8 months of eribulin and selinexor, remains on selinexor with 100% target regression and an indeterminate brain lesion. Conclusions: Selinexor with eribulin is safe with manageable toxicity profile and modest overall clinical efficacy. Durable responses and disease control were observed with metastatic TNBC. Further study is needed to examine the determinants of response to this combination. Clinical trial information: NCT02419495.

Effect of immunotherapy and time-of-day infusion chronomodulation on survival in advanced cancers

1588

Background: Emerging clinical studies report correlation of time-of-day infusion (TOI) to immunotherapy outcomes and the intricate interplay of the human circadian rhythm and cancer and immunotherapy exposure. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown cancer chronotherapy to play important role in transcriptional rhythmicity of oncogenic process. We evaluated the association of TOI and immunotherapy outcomes in a large cohort to determine impact of TOI on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Methods: We reviewed charts of patients with solid tumors who received immunotherapy, specifically anti programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Infusion times were divided into two hours cohorts from 8am-8pm and one overnight cohort from 8pm-8am. Accelerated failure time models were used to model OS (log-normal distribution) and PFS (Weibull distribution) with relation to TOI after adjusting for factors such as age, gender, tumor type and prednisone > 10mg daily use within 1 month of immunotherapy initiation to minimize confounding factors. Results: Of 6151 patients with advanced tumors, 4441 patients received immunotherapy therapy after adjusting for minimum 140 patients in each tumor cohort from 10/15/2016 until 10/15/2021. Tumor types included advanced lung cancer (31.4%), melanoma (28.7%), renal (14.4%), breast (7.6%), colon (6.2%), liver cancer (3.9%) and head and neck (H&N) cancers (2.8%). Median age was 63 (15-99) with 58% males and 42% female. 1894 (43%) patients received investigational agents and 2547 (57%) received standard of care therapies. Mechanism of action of various agents: anti PD1, anti-PDL1, TGF-βRII and anti-PDL1, anti-PD-1 with OX40+ T Cell activation, PD-1 / PD-L1 bispecific antibody, PD-L1 dependent 4-1BB agonist and anti PD-1 and CTLA-4 activity. Among all patients, median OS was 26.4 months while median PFS was 4.8 months. Preponderance of immunotherapy TOI occurred between 12-2pm and 2-4pm in all patients. Patients receiving overnight TOI with lung, renal and breast cancer demonstrated significantly (p < 0.05) poorer OS compared to TOI (10am-4pm) whereas in melanoma, significantly lower OS was seen with overnight, 8-10am and 6-8pm compared to 10am-4pm TOIs. Among H&N cancer patients, early TOI (8-10am) was associated with significantly lower OS compared to afternoon TOI (12pm-4pm). PFS trends were less distinct than for OS but showed a slighted inverted tendency towards lower PFS following daytime TOI. Conclusions: In this large cohort of patients treated with immunotherapy, clinically significant association of TOI with overall survival is seen. These intriguing findings warrant prospective validation in a future randomized trial to harness the role of chronomodulation of cancer therapies for improving outcomes.

Efficacy of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced cancer of unknown primary (CUP): a phase 2 non-randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is an aggressive rare malignancy with limited treatment options. Data regarding clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in CUP is lacking. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death-1 inhibitor, in patients with CUP.

METHODS

The study was designed as a phase 2 basket trial for independent rare tumor cohorts including CUP. Adult patients with CUP who had progressed on previous systemic therapy, performance status 0/1 and measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST V.1.1) were eligible. Patients received pembrolizumab (200 mg) intravenously every 21 days. Twenty-nine patients were enrolled and treated between August 2016 and June 2020. The primary endpoint was non-progression rate (NPR) at 27 weeks (NPR-27) per immune-related RECIST. Key prespecified secondary endpoints were confirmed objective response rate (ORR), safety, duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Pretreatment biopsies were examined for biomarkers of response (programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)).

RESULTS

Among 25 (of 29 enrolled) eligible and evaluable patients, 14 (56%) had poorly differentiated carcinoma. Patients received a median of two lines of therapy prior to enrollment. Median follow-up was 27.3 months. NPR-27 was observed in seven patients (28.0% (95% CI: 12.1 to 49.4)). ORR was 20.0% (95% CI: 6.8 to 40.7) with five patients achieving immune-related partial response with median DoR of 14.7 months (95% CI: 9.8 to 19.6). Median PFS and OS were 4.1 (95% CI: 3.1 to 5.1) and 11.3 (95% CI: 5.5 to 17.1) months, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of any and grade ≥3 were seen in 19 (76%) and 4 (16%) patients, respectively. One (4%) patient had grade 3 immune-related acute kidney injury requiring treatment discontinuation. Neither PD-L1 nor TILs were associated with NPR-27. Both positive PD-L1 staining (44.4% vs 6.3%; p=0.040) and intense TIL infiltration (44.4% vs 6.3%; p=0.040) were associated with response.

CONCLUSION

Pembrolizumab showed encouraging efficacy in patients with CUP with acceptable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02721732.

Corticosteroid-Refractory Myositis After Dual BRAF and MEK Inhibition in a Patient with BRAF V600E-Mutant Metastatic Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy, which is rich in actionable alterations. Genomic aberrations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway are common, and BRAF exon 15 p.V600E mutations are present in 5–7% of biliary tract cancers (BTC). Dual inhibition of BRAF and MEK has been established for BRAF-mutated melanoma and lung cancer, and recent basket trials have shown efficacy of this combination in BRAF V600E-mutant BTCs. Here, we report on a patient with BRAF exon 15 p.V600E mutant metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who was started on BRAF and MEK inhibition with vemurafenib and combimetinib. Shortly thereafter, he developed debilitating myositis, which was refractory to corticosteroids, requiring therapeutic plasma exchange and intravenous immunoglobulin. We also review BRAF as a target in BTCs, relevant clinical trials, and adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibition.

The CTSA University of Texas Health Science Center (UTHSC) Northeast-Tyler and Rio Grande Valley Success Story: How Rural, Underserved Academic Communities Rapidly Built a Robust Engine for Collaborative COVID-19 Clinical Research

In 2018, The University of Texas Health Science Center-Tyler and University of Texas Rio Grande Valley were invited to develop clinical research units for an existing Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium with the objective to equip medically underserved, economically disadvantaged communities and subsequently to deploy COVID-19 clinical trials in response to a public health emergency.

Selinexor in combination with standard chemotherapy in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

Selinexor, an oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE), was demonstrated to hinder the DNA damage repair (DDR) system by reducing DDR proteins while enhancing the killing of cancer cells by DDR-based therapeutics in vivo studies. In this single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study, selinexor with carboplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (DC), irinotecan with fluorouracil and folinic acid (FOLFIRI), irinotecan, and capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX), were employed as separate parallel arms. Eligible patients have relapsed/ metastatic refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or addition of selinexor to systemic therapy was appropriate. Nineteen patients were treated in the 5 arms. Tumor types included were colorectal (n  = 3), breast (n  = 3), neuroendocrine (n  = 2), ovarian (n  = 2), and pancreas cancers (n  = 2). All patients developed one treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). The most prevalent TRAE were thrombocytopenia (84%), nausea (68%), leukopenia (68%), neutropenia (63%), and fatigue (58%). The common grade 3/4 TRAE were neutropenia (42%), leukopenia (26%), and hyponatremia (21%). Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in 3 separate arms. Fourteen patients were evaluable for response. Although no patients achieved complete or partial response (CR or PR), seven patients attained stable disease (SD). Disease control rate (DCR) was 14%. The combination of oral selinexor with different standard chemotherapies showed limited clinical activity despite toxicity and DLT prevented further dose escalation. Optimizing supportive care, the utility of growth factors, and aggressive measures on antiemetics strategies remain tangible.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495). Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics

300. Long COVID in Cancer Patients: Preponderance of Symptoms in Majority of Patients Over Long Time Period

Background

An increasing number of observational studies have reported the persistence of symptoms following recovery from acute COVID-19 disease. The long-term consequences of COVID-19 are not fully understood and there is no clear consensus on the definition of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). The reported prevalence of PASC widely varies from 10% up to 87%. The purpose of this study is to assess PASC in cancer patients following acute COVID-19 recovery.

Methods

We assessed cancer patients at MD Anderson Cancer Center who were diagnosed with COVID-19 disease between March 1, 2020 and Sept 1, 2020. Using patient questionnaires and medical chart reviews we followed these patients from March 2020 till May 2021. Patient questionnaires were sent out remotely daily for 14 days after COVID-19 diagnosis then weekly for 3 months, and then monthly thereafter. Chart reviews were conducted for each patient hospital re-admission and emergency department visit. These admissions were classified as either COVID-19 related or non-related. The persistence or emergence of new COVID19-related symptoms were captured at each COVID-19 related admission.

Results

We included 312 cancer patients with a median age of 57 years (18-86). The majority of patients had solid tumors (75%). Of the 312 patients, 188 (60%) reported long COVID-19 symptoms with a median duration of 7 months and up to 14 months after COVID-19 diagnosis. The most common symptoms reported included fatigue (82%), sleep disturbances (78%), myalgias (67%) and gastrointestinal symptoms (61%), followed by headache, altered smell or taste, dyspnea (47%) and cough (46%). A higher number of females reported a persistence of symptoms compared to males (63% vs 37%; p=0.036). Cancer type, neutropenia, lymphocytopenia, and hospital admission during acute COVID-19 disease were comparable in both groups and did not seem to contribute to a higher number of long-COVID-19 patients in our study group.

Conclusion

Long-COVID occurs in 60% of cancer patients and may persist up to 14 months after acute illness. The most common symptoms are fatigue, sleep disturbance, myalgia and gastro-intestinal symptoms.

Disclosures

Fareed Khawaja, MBBS, Eurofins Viracor (Research Grant or Support)

Compliance with dietary guidelines and its relationship with symptoms and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer in early-phase oncology clinical trials

199

Background: We examined compliance with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans and its association with symptom burden and clinical outcomes in patients with advanced cancer in early-phase clinical trials testing novel immunotherapeutic and targeted agents. Methods: Patients starting an early-phase clinical trial (ECOG-PS = 0-1) were recruited into a prospective, longitudinal design with assessments at baseline and at the end of Cycle 1. Diet and symptom burden were assessed using the validated National Cancer Institute Diet History Questionnaire (NCI-DHQ) and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, respectively. Compliance with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans recommendations was measured via the Healthy Eating Index (HEI) (a measure of dietary intake per total energy), computed from NCI-DHQ food group and nutrient scores; higher HEI scores indicate greater compliance with dietary guidance recommendations (possible range = 0–100). Statistical tests included Spearman rank correlations (rho), and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: Among early-phase clinical trial patients [N = 40; 50% female; 80% Non-Hispanic White; 80% ECOG = 1; 36% on trials including an immunotherapeutic agent and 64% on targeted therapy trials; mean age = 55y; mean BMI = 28], mean HEI was 69, compared to 59 for the US general population. The proportion of phase I clinical trial patients who met adequacy guidelines were 80% for whole fruit, 73% for total protein foods, 55% for seafood and plant proteins, 55% for total fruit, 50% for greens and beans, 28% for total vegetables, 15% for fatty acids [(PUFAs + MUFAs)/SFAs ≥2.5], 13% for dairy, and 0% for whole grains. The proportion of patients who met moderation guidelines were 28% for refined grains, 28% for added sugar, 13% for saturated fat, and 0% for sodium. Female patients had higher HEI scores than male patients (73 vs. 65, P = 0.004). Patients who were normal weight (BMI < 25) had higher scores for meeting the moderation in sugar intake guideline than overweight patients (BMI≥25) (7.7 vs. 5.5, P = 0.031). Higher intakes of cooked lean meat from beef, pork, veal, lamb, and game were linked to prolonged overall survival (HR = 0.5, 95%CI = 0.26, 0.96, P = 0.039). In immunotherapy patients, greater compliance with seafood and plant protein recommendations was associated with less fatigue at end of Cycle 1 (rho = -0.7, P = 0.008); in targeted therapy patients, higher glycemic load was associated with worse pain (rho = 0.7, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Diets of these early-phase clinical trial patients overall were congruent with recommendations in the Dietary Guidelines for Americans. However, increasing intakes of whole grains and reducing sodium intakes may be useful dietary goals for this population. Also, dietary factors may influence symptoms, such as fatigue and pain, in early-phase clinical trial patients with advanced cancer.

Selinexor in combination with topotecan in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: Results of an open-label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study

Background Selinexor, a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound inhibits Exportin-1(XPO1), had demonstrated synergistic activity with many chemotherapies and conferred in vivo antitumor efficacy in hematologic as well as solid tumors. Methods This open-label, single-center, multi-arm phase 1b study used a standard 3 + 3 design and a "basket type" expansion. Selinexor with intravenous topotecan was given in one of the 13 parallel arms. Patients with advanced or metastatic relapsed/refractory solid tumors following prior systemic therapy, or in whom the addition of selinexor to standard chemotherapy deemed appropriate, were eligible. Results Fourteen patients with the median age of 61 years (range, 22-68years) were treated, and the most common cancer types were gynecological cancers; ovarian (n = 5), endometrial (n = 2), and 1 each with fallopian tube and vaginal cancers. Of the 14 patients treated, 12 (86 %) had at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The most common TRAEs were anemia (71 %), thrombocytopenia (57 %), hyponatremia (57 %), vomiting (57 %), fatigue (50 %), nausea (50 %), and neutropenia (36 %). Two patients had dose limiting toxicities. One patient dosed at selinexor 80 mg had grade 3 nausea and vomiting and one patient dosed at selinexor 60 mg experienced grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Of the 13 efficacy evaluable patients, one (8 %) with endometrial cancer achieved unconfirmed partial response (uPR) and the time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 48 weeks, whereas 6 of the 13 (46 %) patients had stable disease (SD) contributing to the clinical benefit rate of 46 %. The median TTF for all patients was 9 weeks (range, 2-48weeks). Conclusions Once weekly selinexor in combination with topotecan was viable and showed some preliminary tumor efficacy. The recommend phase 2 dose of selinexor was 60 mg once weekly in combination with IV topotecan.Trial registration: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495.

Selinexor in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with advanced solid tumors: Results of a single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study

Background. Carboplatin and paclitaxel (CT) is one of the standard chemotherapy regimens used in various tumor types. Preclinical models have suggested that selinexor, a first-in-class oral potent selective inhibitor of nuclear export Exportin-1, and CT exerts antitumor activity in multiple malignancies. Methods. This was a single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study utilizing a “basket type” expansion. CT and selinexor was employed as one of the 13 parallel arms. Advanced relapsed/refractory solid tumors following standard therapy or where the addition of selinexor to standard regimens deemed appropriate, were eligible. Results. Of 13 patients treated, 12 patients were evaluable for response. The most common cancers were breast (n = 4), esophageal (n = 2), ovarian (n = 2) and non-small cell lung cancers (n = 2). All 13 patients had at least one treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and the most common were neutropenia (85%), leukopenia (85%), thrombocytopenia (85%), anemia (69%), nausea (54%), vomiting (46%), and fatigue (46%). One patient at 60 mg QW experienced DLT with grade 3 nausea and vomiting lasting 3 days. Unconfirmed partial response (uPR) was observed in 3 patients; one patient each with esophageal, breast, and ovarian cancer. One patient with esophageal adenocarcinoma had confirmed PR, however, was discontinued from the study due to clinical progression. Five patients achieved stable disease (SD). Disease control rate was 8%. Majority of patients (77%), including two patients who had uPR, had prior exposure to carboplatin and/or paclitaxel. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) ranged from 1 to 153 weeks. Conclusion. The RP2D of selinexor was 60 mg QW in combination with CT. The combination conferred viable clinical activity with durable objective responses which should further be explored in tumor types for which CT is used as standard of care. Trial information. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02419495. Sponsor(s): Karyopharm Therapeutics. (Trial registration: NCT02419495. Registered 14 April 2015, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02419495).

Supportive care for the prevention of nausea, vomiting and anorexia in a phase 1B study of selinexor in advanced cancer patients: an exploratory study

INTRODUCTION

Clinical observations of cancer patients treated with selinexor have reported high incidence of nausea and anorexia. The study objective was to investigate the adoption of prophylactic olanzapine for the prevention of nausea, vomiting and anorexia in cancer patients receiving selinexor and standard chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed supportive care interventions in patients receiving selinexor and recorded frequency of adverse events (NCI-CTAE). Association between categorical variables were analyzed using Fisher's exact tests; repeated measures analysis was performed to assess weight changes over time.

RESULTS

Of 124 evaluable patients, 83 (66.9%) were female, 93 were white (75.0%), and the most common cancer was ovarian (N = 30, 24.2%). One hundred and four patients (83.9%) received olanzapine, of which 93 (89.4%) were prophylactically treated, the majority (86.5%) receiving low 2.5 mg daily dose. Other anti-emetics included ondansetron in 90 patients (72.6%), dexamethasone prescribed in 50 patients (40.3%) and metoclopramide in 49 patients (39.5%), while aprepitant/fosaprepitant (N = 2, 1.6%) were prescribed infrequently. Cancer patients receiving prophylactic olanzapine (N = 93) compared to patients who never received olanzapine (N = 20) had more Grade 1 + anorexia (31.2% vs 20.0%), less nausea (53.8% vs 70.0%), less vomiting (33.3% vs 40.0%), and increased hyperglycemia (29.0% vs 10.0%), but differences were non-statistically significant. In addition, there was minimal weight loss over time in both groups and no statistically significant differences in weight loss between groups.

CONCLUSION

Prophylactic olanzapine decreased nausea, vomiting and maintained weight over 3 months but did not prevent anorexia in patients receiving selinexor and chemotherapy. Low dose olanzapine was well tolerated but associated with hyperglycemia.

PIK3CA mutations in plasma circulating tumor DNA predict survival and treatment outcomes in patients with advanced cancers

Background

Oncogenic mutations in PIK3CA are prevalent in diverse cancers and can be targeted with inhibitors of the phosphoinositide-3-kinase/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K/AKT/mTOR) pathway. Analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides a minimally invasive approach to detect clinically actionable PIK3CA mutations.

Patients and methods

We analyzed PIK3CA hotspot mutation frequency by droplet digital PCR (QX 200; BioRad) using 16 ng of unamplified plasma-derived cell-free DNA from 68 patients with advanced solid tumors (breast cancer, n = 41; colorectal cancer, n = 13; other tumor types, n = 14). Results quantified as variant allele frequencies (VAFs) were compared with previous testing of archival tumor tissue and with patient outcomes.

Results

Of 68 patients, 58 (85%) had PIK3CA mutations in tumor tissue and 43 (74%) PIK3CA mutations in ctDNA with an overall concordance of 72% (49/68, κ = 0.38). In a subset analysis, which excluded samples from 26 patients known not to have disease progression at the time of sample collection, we found an overall concordance of 91% (38/42; κ = 0.74). PIK3CA-mutated ctDNA VAF of ≤8.5% (5% trimmed mean) showed a longer median survival compared with patients with a higher VAF (15.9 versus 9.4 months; 95% confidence interval 6.7-17.1 months; P = 0.014). Longitudinal analysis of ctDNA in 18 patients with serial plasma collections (range 2-22 time points, median 5) showed that those with a decrease in PIK3CA VAF had a longer time to treatment failure (TTF) compared with patients with an increase or no change (10.7 versus 2.6 months; P = 0.048).

Conclusions

Detection of PIK3CA mutations in ctDNA is concordant with testing of archival tumor tissue. Low quantity of PIK3CA-mutant ctDNA is associated with longer survival and a decrease in PIK3CA-mutant ctDNA on therapy is associated with longer TTF.

•

Testing for PIK3CA mutations in ctDNA is concordant with testing of tumor tissue.

•

High PIK3CA-mutant abundance in ctDNA was associated with shorter survival.

•

Increasing PIK3CA-mutant abundance in serial blood samples was associated with shorter TTF.

•

Longitudinal monitoring of PIK3CA-mutant ctDNA tracked with cancer clinical course.

A phase i study of ixazomib and erlotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have shown that the combined inhibition of EGFR and NF-kB pathways to target the RalB/TBK1 pathway led to synergistic antitumor activity. Based on this rationale, we conducted a Phase I dose-escalation study combining the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib with the NF-kB inhibitor ixazomib in advanced solid tumors. Patients and methods. Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible. The bayesian optimal interval phase I dose escalation design was used to establish the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Results. Nineteen patients with a range of solid tumors were enrolled. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were diarrhea (42.1%, 8/19), followed by rash (36.8%, 7/19) and nausea (21.1%, 4/19). The combination RP2D for oral ixazomib was 4.0 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle, with oral erlotinib 150 mg daily. While no patient achieved RECIST v1.1 objective responses, 3 patients with advanced sarcoma experienced durable RECIST v1.1 stable disease ≥ 6 months (8.4, 10.6, and 15.7 months) and the best response was -13% decrease in clear cell sarcoma. Conclusions. The combination of erlotinib and ixazomib was safe and well tolerated among patients with advanced cancer, with preliminary signals of antitumor activity in patients with advanced sarcoma.

Author response to Cunha et al

The need to identify biomarkers to predict immunotherapy response for rare cancers has been long overdue. We aimed to study this in our paper, 'Radiomics analysis for predicting pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancers'. In this response to the Letter to the Editor by Cunha et al, we explain and discuss the reasons behind choosing LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) and XGBoost (eXtreme Gradient Boosting) with LOOCV (Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation) as the feature selection and classifier method, respectively for our radiomics models. Also, we highlight what care was taken to avoid any overfitting on the models. Further, we checked for the multicollinearity of the features. Additionally, we performed 10-fold cross-validation instead of LOOCV to see the predictive performance of our radiomics models.

Abstract 974: Phase II trial of the Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib in advanced refractory solid tumors with CCNE1 amplification

Background: Wee1 kinase, which prevents premature mitotic entry by inhibiting cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), may be essential when cyclin E1 is overexpressed in order to prevent DNA damage and cell death. In preclinical studies, cancer models harboring CCNE1 amplification are highly sensitive to treatment with adavosertib, a Wee1 kinase inhibitor. A multicenter phase 2 study was conducted to assess the antitumor activity of adavosertib in patients with CCNE1 amplified advanced refractory solid tumors.

Methods: Patients with advanced refractory solid tumors harboring CCNE1 amplification pre-identified in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratory were eligible. They had refractory disease, on standard options available, or they declined standard-of-care therapy. Eligible patients must be aged ≥ 18 years and had measurable disease per RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) 1.1, ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status of 0-1, and adequate organ functions. After informed consent, patients received adavosertib 300 mg daily on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The trial employed Simon's two-stage design.

Results: Between January 22, 2019 and May 20, 2020, 29 patients with 12 tumor types were enrolled on study: ovarian = 14, breast = 3, endometrial = 2; and carcinosarcoma, cholangiocarcinoma, esophageal, gallbladder, germ cell tumor, melanoma, prostate, sarcoma, sarcomatoid and urothelial = 10 (1 each tumor). Median follow-up was 11.7 months. The median line of prior systemic therapy was 4 (range 1-8). Twenty-seven patients were evaluable for response. In these patients, 7 confirmed partial responses (PR) were observed, for an ORR of 25.9% (95% CI 15.1-47.5%). The median progression-free survival was 4.0 months and one-year overall survival was 55%. In 13 patients with measurable high-grade serous ovarian cancer, 5 achieved PR (38.5%) and 8 had stable disease ≥6 months/PR (61.5%). Other PRs were seen in 1 urothelial carcinoma and 1 melanoma. Fifteen patients experienced grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events: neutropenia (24%), thrombocytopenia (17%), anemia (14%), nausea (17%), diarrhea (17%) and fatigue (17%). Sixteen patients required dose duction of adavosertib to 250 mg, and 7 further to 200 mg. Biomarker analysis is ongoing to investigate potential biomarkers of response.

Conclusions: Adavosertib monotherapy demonstrates promising clinical activity in patients with refractory solid tumors harboring CCNE1 amplification, especially in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Further exploration of adavosertib in CCNE1 amplified high grade serous ovarian cancer is warranted.

Citation Format: Siqing Fu, Shuyang Yao, Yuan Yuan, Rebecca A. Previs, Anthony D. Elias, Richard Carvajal, Thomas J. George, Ying Yuan, Yuko Yamamura, Shannon Westin, Yan Xing, Ecaterina E. Ileana Dumbrava, Daniel D. Karp, Sarina A. Piha-Paul, Apostolia M. Tsimberidou, Jordi Rodon, Naoko Takebe, Charles Kunos, Karen Lu, Khanda Keyomarsi, Funda Meric-Bernstam. Phase II trial of the Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib in advanced refractory solid tumors with CCNE1 amplification [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 974.

Phase 2 study of pembrolizumab in patients with advanced rare cancers

Background

Patients with advanced rare cancers have poor prognosis and few treatment options. As immunotherapy is effective across multiple cancer types, we aimed to assess pembrolizumab (programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor) in patients with advanced rare cancers.

Methods

In this open-label, phase 2 trial, patients with advanced rare cancers whose tumors had progressed on standard therapies, if available, within the previous 6 months were enrolled in nine tumor-specific cohorts and a 10th cohort for other rare histologies. Pembrolizumab 200 mg was administered intravenously every 21 days. The primary endpoint was non-progression rate (NPR) at 27 weeks; secondary endpoints were safety and tolerability, objective response rate (ORR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR).

Results

A total of 127 patients treated between August 15, 2016 and July 27, 2018 were included in this analysis. At the time of data cut-off, the NPR at 27 weeks was 28% (95% CI, 19% to 37%). A confirmed objective response (OR) was seen in 15 of 110 (14%) evaluable patients (complete response in one and partial response in 14). CBR, defined as the percentage of patients with an OR or stable disease ≥4 months, was 38% (n=42). Treatment was ongoing in 11 of 15 patients with OR at last follow-up. In the cohort with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the skin, the NPR at 27 weeks was 36%, ORR 31%, and CBR 38%. In patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC), NPR at 27 weeks was 31%, ORR 15%, and CBR 54%. In the patients with carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP), NPR at 27 weeks was 33%, ORR 23%, and CBR 54%. In the paraganglioma–pheochromocytoma cohort, NPR at 27 weeks was 43%, ORR 0%, and CBR 75%. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 66 of 127 (52%) patients, and 12 (9%) had grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were fatigue (n=25) and rash (n=17). There were six deaths, all of which were unrelated to the study drug.

Conclusions

The favorable toxicity profile and antitumor activity seen in patients with SCC of skin, ACC, CUP, and paraganglioma–pheochromocytoma supports further evaluation of pembrolizumab in this patient population.

Trial registration number

NCT02721732

First-in-human biomarker-driven phase I trial of the potent and selective glutaminase-1 (GLS1) inhibitor IACS-6274 (IPN60090) in patients (pts) with molecularly selected advanced solid tumors

3001

Background: Glutamine metabolism is frequently deregulated in different cancers, including tumors harboring KEAP1/ NFE2L2 mutations or those expressing low Asparagine Synthetase (ASNS) levels. IACS-6274 is a potent oral GLS1 inhibitor discovered at MD Anderson Cancer Center with excellent pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity in biomarker-defined preclinical models. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors received IACS-6274 BID at escalating doses using a phase 1 BOIN design. PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies were conducted in serial tumor and/or blood samples. Peripheral glutamine metabolism was assessed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to assess glutamine metabolism via 13C-isotope labelling. Predictive biomarker studies included tumor analyses for KEAP1, NFE2L2, STK11, NF1 mutations and IHC for ASNS loss. Results: 22 pts with advanced ovarian (n=8), NSCLC (n=7), melanoma (n=2), leiomyosarcoma, gastric, anal, endometrial and HNSCC (all n=1) received IACS-6274 at 20 (n=1), 40 (n=1), 80 (n=1), 120 (n=4), 180 (n=11) or 240 (n=4) mg BID. Molecular alterations assessed included pts with ASNS loss (n=6), STK11 (n=5), KEAP1 (n=5), NFE2L2 (n=4) and NF1 (n=1). Prior lines of therapies: 2-4 (n=12); ≥5 (n=10). Common IACS-6274-related adverse events included G1-2 photopsia (n=7), photophobia (n=7), increased creatinine (n=4) and AST (n=4). Less common G3 toxicities at 180 and 240 mg included reversible nausea (n=3), vomiting and fatigue (n=2). Dose-limiting toxicities of G3 acute renal failure and PRES syndrome were seen in one patient at 240mg BID, which fully resolved. Plasma exposures showed a dose-dependent increase across doses with observed half-life ̃12 hrs. Patients at 180mg displayed steady-state exposures at C1D14 with Cmax of 45.8 μM +/- 18.6 μM and average AUC(0-12hrs) of 382.48 h*μM +/- 159.27 h*μM. Glutamate to glutamine ratios decreased in PBMC samples in pts at C1D14 vs baseline; pts at 120, 180 and 240 mg had inhibition of 82.5% (P<0.0001), 83.9% (P<0.0001) and 85.3% (P<0.0001), respectively, exceeding doses predicted to be efficacious in preclinical models. A robust PK/PD relationship was established across doses (P<0.0001). The recommended phase 2 dose was 180mg BID. Best RECISTv1.1 response was stable disease (SD) in 17 of 20 evaluable pts. Disease control rate at 12 weeks was 60%. Durable RECISTv1.1 SD ≥6 months +/- tumor regression were seen in pts with advanced ASNS-loss ovarian cancer (n=2), PD-1/L1-exposed melanoma (n=2) and NF1 mutant leiomyosarcoma (n=1). Conclusions: IACS-6274 was well tolerated at biologically active doses with good human PK, significant PD target modulation and preliminary antitumor activity observed. The clinical trial assessment of rational combinations to maximize benefit in molecularly-selected pts is initiating. Clinical trial information: NCT03894540.

A phase 1b study of novel immunogenic cell death inducer PT-112 plus PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients

e17025

Background: PT-112 is a novel pyrophosphate-platinum conjugate that induces immunogenic cell death, reaches highest concentrations in bone (osteotropism), and synergizes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in preclinical models. Phase I studies in solid tumors, as monotherapy and in combination with PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab (“PAVE”), as well as in multiple myeloma as monotherapy have demonstrated that PT-112 is well-tolerated and active. We present updated safety and exploratory efficacy findings in a mCRPC sub-population treated with PAVE, including a cohort of patients at a lower-frequency dosing schedule. Methods: A total of 32 mCRPC patients (pts) received 800 mg of avelumab on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, of whom 18 received PT-112 on days 1, 8 and 15 at 200mg/m2 (n = 17) or 150 mg/m2 (n = 1); a separate cohort of 14 received PT-112 on days 1 and 15 at 300 mg/m2 (n = 13) or 200mg/m2 (n = 1). Results: Median age was 68 (range 47-87) and number of prior lines of therapy (Tx) was 7 (2-12), including prior platinum-containing therapy in 11 (34%) and ICI Tx in 9 pts (28%). Baseline grade 2 anemia was seen in 7 (22%) pts. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were anemia (47%) and thrombocytopenia (41%); 23 pts (72%) had ≥1 grade 3-4 TRAE, with no cases of bleeding, sepsis, or grade 5 TRAEs. Antitumor effects included 8 (25%) pts with a PSA reduction of ≥50% (PSA50); 5 (16%) were maintained through ≥1 follow-up. Of ten pts with RECIST-measurable disease, 3 had tumor volume reductions, one with a confirmed partial response (PR). Twenty-four (75%) pts experienced a reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (median reduction 15%), and improvement in patient-reported pain and quality of life was observed. For the 13 pts given 300 mg/m2 PT-112 bi-weekly, 7 (54%) had prior platinum-containing Tx and 4 (31%) had baseline grade 2 anemia. The most common TRAEs were anemia (69%) and thrombocytopenia (54%), with 11 (85%) pts having ≥1 grade 3-4 TRAE. Four pts (31%) had PSA50 reductions; 3 (23%) were maintained through ≥1 follow-up. Conclusions: PAVE is safe and generally well tolerated in mCRPC patients at the doses and schedules tested, providing meaningful antitumor effects in heavily pre-treated patients, including tumor volume, PSA and ALP reductions. Reductions in ALP may be indicative of anti-cancer activity at bone sites of disease. Although the sample sizes are small, the frequency of confirmed PSA50 responses and of grade 3-4 TRAEs was slightly higher in the group receiving biweekly 300 mg/m2 PT-112, and higher rates of TRAEs may be explained by higher baseline anemia and/or prior platinum Tx. Further clinical investigation of the combination of PT-112 plus ICIs in a less heavily pre-treated mCRPC population is warranted. A phase 2 study of PT-112 monotherapy in mCRPC is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03409458.

Patients with advanced solid cancers treated with ERK inhibitors exhibit pseudo-progession in lymphatic nodes

3138

Background: ERK1/2 signaling is often overactivated in cancer, especially in patients with molecular alterations activating the MAPK pathway. MAPK pathway inhibition can result in the increase of CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells and decreased expression of immunosuppressive cytokines. Methods: This is a retrospective study of 52 patients with advanced solid cancers and oncogenic alterations in the MAPK pathway, who were treated in phase I/II clinical trials with five different single agent ERK1/2 inhibitors at MD Anderson Cancer Center. We reviewed serial PET and/or CT imaging obtained before therapy, on therapy, and after therapy completion. We evaluated dynamic changes in the lymphatic nodes (LN) in the context of overall response per RECIST 1.1 and other outcomes. Results: Of the 52 patients, 19 (37%) patients were evaluated with serial PET/CT and 33 (63%) with serial CT imaging only. Of the 19 patients evaluated with PET/CT, 12 (63%) demonstrated increased FDG uptake in LN compared to pre-treatment imaging (LN enlargement, n = 9; no LN enlargement, n = 3) discrepant from the known target and non-target lesions. These 12 patients were on therapy with ERK inhibitors (11 at doses > recommended phase 2 dose [RP2D]) for a median of 3.6 months (range, 1.8-12 months) with a best response per RECIST 1.1. as follows: partial response, n = 1; stable disease (SD), n = 10; progressive disease (PD), n = 1. Of interest, in 6 of those 12 patients, FDG uptake in LN decreased or resolved after treatment discontinuation. Further, one patient had a biopsy of an emerged LN, which showed lymphocytic infiltrate without tumor cells. Of the 33 patients evaluated with CT only, 5 (15%) demonstrated increased size of LN discrepant from the known target and non-target lesions compared to pre-treatment imaging. These 5 patients were on therapy with ERK inhibitors (all at doses < RP2D) for a median of 1.4 months (range, 1.1-3.5 months) with a best response per RECIST 1.1. as follows: SD, n = 2; PD, n = 3. Of interest, in 2 of those 5 patients, size of LN decreased or resolved after treatment discontinuation. In addition, one patient had a biopsy of an emerged LN, which showed lymphoid aggerates without tumor cells. Conclusions: Our data suggest that treatment with ERK inhibitors can result in activation of the lymphatic nodes, which can manifest as pseudo-progression. This can lead to an inconclusive assessment of their therapeutic benefit and further suggests exploration of the potential synergistic effects with immune therapy.

Initiative for Molecular Profiling and Advanced Cancer Therapy (IMPACT2): Challenges and Opportunities in Conducting an MD Anderson Randomized Study in Precision Oncology

3140

Background: Precision oncology is associated with favorable outcomes in selected patients with cancer. Our first IMPACT trial (IMPACT1) demonstrated that in sequential patients with advanced cancer who had tumor molecular testing and participated in phase I clinical trials, matched targeted therapy (MTT) was associated with superior rates of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival compared with those of patients who received non-MTT. Despite the statistical significance for these outcomes, the study was non-randomized. Recognizing that it would be difficult to randomize patients we nonetheless undertook IMPACT2, a phase 2 randomized study to determine whether patients treated on the basis of tumor genomic alterations have longer PFS compared to those whose treatment is not selected on the basis of molecular alteration analysis. Methods: Patients with metastatic cancer undergo a tumor biopsy and genomic profiling. Patients are presented at tumor board and are offered to be randomized between two arms: MTT or non-MTT, when criteria (biomarker present, available clinical trial, eligibility criteria met, insurance approval) are met. In April 2019, we amended the trial to include a “patient-preference” cohort for each arm. Patients who decline randomization are offered choice of arm (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02152254). The primary analysis will use both randomized and patient-preference cohorts based on a Bayesian hierarchical model that “borrows” from the patient-preference cohorts to the extent to which its PFS agrees with that in the randomization cohort. Results: The key barriers randomizing patients with actionable molecular alterations are patient-related (advanced, metastatic setting requiring immediate intervening therapy; decline in performance status, organ function; or death); drug-related (FDA-approved drug available; or unavailable MTT against key driver biomarker) or financial (no insurance coverage of MTT; lack of patient resources to participate in trials). As the study spans over a few years, some investigational agents that were considered non-MTT at the time of treatment assignment were later proven to be MTT (e.g., immunotherapeutic agents targeting high tumor mutational burden); and/or were approved by the FDA. Conclusions: Although randomized trials have been considered the gold standard in drug development, such studies in the advanced metastatic setting are complicated. The benefit of Precision Oncology has been exemplified in individual patients who were treated with biomarker-selected therapy. The adaptive design of IMPACT2 enables patient randomization despite the evolving tumor biomarkers and the plethora of investigational drugs. IMPACT2 provides insights for the development of cancer genome-based medicine. Outcomesfor randomized patients are awaited. Clinical trial information: NCT02152254.

Phase I study of TT-00420, a multiple kinase inhibitor, as a single agent in advanced solid tumors

3090

Background: TT-00420 is a spectrum-selective multi-kinase inhibitor that targets cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and immune-oncology pathways by inhibiting Aurora kinases A/B and Janus kinases (JAK) involved in cytokine signaling and receptor tyrosine kinases (FGFRs and VEGFRs) involved in the tumor microenvironment. TT-00420 has demonstrated anti-tumor activity in both in vitro and in vivo preclinical models of solid tumors, including triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). Methods: The phase I, first-in-human dose escalation and expansion study of TT-00420 is enrolling adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. TT-00420 capsules in 1 mg or 5 mg formulation are administered orally once daily in 28-day cycles. Dose escalation is guided by Bayesian modeling with overdose control. The primary safety endpoints are to determine dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) and a dose recommended for dose expansion (DRDE). Secondary endpoints include pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary efficacy evaluated per RECIST v1.1 criteria. Results: As of February 17, 2021, 40 advanced solid tumor patients were enrolled in dose escalation cohorts and received at least one dose of TT-00420 in 7 dose levels: 1 mg q.d. (N=1), 3 mg q.d. (N=1), 5 mg q.d. (N=4), 8 mg q.d. (N=10), 10 mg q.d. (N=6), 12 mg q.d. (N=12), and 15 mg q.d. (N=6). DLTs were observed in 3 out of 32 DLT-evaluable patients, including 1 patient at 8 mg q.d. who had grade (Gr) 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome and 2 patients at 15 mg q.d. who both had Gr 3 hypertension. Suspected adverse events (AEs) reported in ≥ 20% of patients across all tested dose levels include hypertension (any grade: n=17, 42.5%; Gr 3: n=8, 20.0%), diarrhea (n=10, 25.0%; Gr 3: n=1, 2.5%), vomiting (n=9, 22.5%; Gr 3: n=0), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (n=9, 22.5%; Gr 3: n=1, 2.5%), and nausea (n=8, 20.0%; Gr 3: n=1, 2.5%). No Gr 4 AEs, regardless of causality, were reported. Out of 26 patients who had at least one post-baseline scan, 4 (15.4%) had a best overall objective response of partial response (PR) and 13 (50.0%) had stable disease (SD). Of the patients who achieved PRs are 2 CCA patients (8 mg q.d., n=1; 10 mg q.d., n=1), 1 HER2-negative breast cancer patient (12 mg q.d.), and 1 TNBC (10 mg q.d.). Both CCA patients with PRs had disease control for ≥ 8 months. Of the patients who achieved SD, 1 salivary gland patient (5 mg q.d.) and 1 CCA patient (10 mg q.d.) had disease control for 8 months, and 2 TNBC patients (5 mg q.d., n=1; 8 mg q.d., n=1) had disease control for 6 months prior to disease progression. Conclusions: Toxicities observed in dose escalation cohorts were manageable with concomitant treatment and/or dose interruptions of TT-00420. 12 mg p.o. q.d. was recommended as the dose for dose expansion cohort for further safety and efficacy evaluation of TT-00420 capsules with focus on enrollment of TNBC and CCA patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03654547.

A Phase I Trial of the MET/ALK/ROS1 Inhibitor Crizotinib Combined with the VEGF Inhibitor Pazopanib in Patients with Advanced Solid Malignancies

BACKGROUND

Crizotinib inhibits ALK, MET and ROS1 tyrosine kinases but the development of resistance to monotherapy is an issue. The anti-angiogenic properties of pazopanib could overcome crizotinib drug resistance. Additionally, the anti-angiogenic properties of crizotinib could augment the clinical efficacy of pazopanib.

METHODS

We evaluated the safety and responses in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with crizotinib and pazopanib.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients (median age 53 years, range 18-78 years) were enrolled. The median number of prior systemic therapies was 3 (range, 0-8). We were able to dose escalate to dose level 8 (crizotinib 250 mg twice daily and pazopanib 800 mg daily) with no MTD identified. Grade 3 or 4 toxicities were seen in 32% of patients with the highest prevalence being fatigue (n=9, 11%), diarrhea (n=6, 7%), vomiting (n=3, 4%), anemia (n=2, 2%) and ALT increased (n=2, 2%). Of the 82 patients, 61 (74%) had measurable disease by RECISTv1.1 and reached first restaging (6 weeks). Partial response (PR) was observed in 6/61 (10%) patients, and stable disease (SD) lasting ≥6 months was observed in 10/61 patients (16%) (total = 16/61 (26%) of patients with SD ≥6 months/PR).

CONCLUSION

Dose level 6 (crizotinib 200 mg twice daily and pazopanib 600 mg daily) was the most tolerable dosing of the combination and can be used in future studies. We also observed moderate clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors that had received numerous prior therapies.

Implementation of a Novel Web-Based Lesion Selection Tool to Improve Acquisition of Tumor Biopsy Specimens

Introduction

For maximum utility of molecular characterization by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and better understanding of tumor microenvironment with immune correlates analysis, biopsy specimens must yield adequate tumor tissue, and sequential biopsy specimens should sample a consistent site. We developed a web-based lesion selection tool (LST) that enables management and tracking of the biopsy specimen collections.

Methods

Of 145 patients, the LST was used for 88 patients; the other 57 served as controls. We evaluated consistency of the lesion biopsied in longitudinal collections, number of cores obtained, and cores with adequate tumor cellularity for NGS. The Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used to identify differences between the groups.

Results

The analysis included 30 of 88 (34%) patients in the LST group and 52 of 57 (91%) in the control group. The LST workflow ensured 100% consistency in the lesions biopsied compared with 75% in the control group in longitudinal collections and increased the proportion of patients in whom at least five cores were collected per biopsy.

Conclusions

The novel LST platform facilitates coordination, performance, and management of longitudinal biopsy specimens. Use of the LST enables sampling of the designated lesion consistently, which is likely to accurately inform us the effect of the treatment on tumor microenvironment and evolution of resistant pathways. Such studies are important translational component of any clinical trials and research as they guide the development of next line of therapy, which has significant effect on clinical utility. However, validation of this approach in a larger study is warranted.

Patient-Reported Out-of-Pocket Costs and Financial Toxicity During Early-Phase Oncology Clinical Trials

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials are an important therapeutic option for patients with cancer. Although financial burden in cancer treatment is well documented, the financial burden associated with clinical trials is not well understood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a survey regarding economic burden and financial toxicity in patients with cancer enrolled in phase I clinical trials for >1 month. Financial toxicity score was assessed using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity survey. Patients also reported monthly out-of-pocket (OOP) costs.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirteen patients completed the survey (72% non-Hispanic White; 45% with annual income ≤$60,000; 50% lived >300 miles from the clinic; 37% required air travel). Forty-eight percent of patients had monthly OOP costs of at least $1,000. Fifty-five percent and 64% of patients reported unanticipated medical and nonmedical expenses, respectively. Worse financial toxicity was associated with yearly household income <$60,000 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.7; p = .008), having unanticipated medical costs (OR: 3.2; p = .024), and living >100 miles away from the clinical trial hospital (OR: 2.3; p = .043). Non-White or Hispanic patients (OR: 2.5; p = .011) and patients who were unemployed or not working outside the home (OR: 2.5; p = .016) were more likely to report high unanticipated medical costs.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with cancer participating in clinical trials, economic burden is high, and most of patients' OOP costs were nonmedical costs. Financial toxicity is disproportionally higher in patients with lower income and those who travel farther, and unexpected medical costs were more common among non-White or Hispanic patients. OOP costs can be substantial and are often unexpected for patients.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The financial burden of cancer treatment is well documented, but there are limited data regarding the financial burden associated with cancer clinical trials. This study surveyed 213 patients enrolled in early-phase clinical trials. Monthly out-of-pocket costs were at least $1000 for nearly half of patients. Worse financial toxicity was associated with income <$60,000 and living farther away from the hospital. Racial/ethnic minorities had higher rates of unanticipated medical costs. These data help to quantify the high financial burden for patients and may reveal a cause of disparities in clinical trial enrollment for underrepresented populations.

Overview of Ocular Side Effects of Selinexor

BACKGROUND

The aim of this review is to elucidate the type and frequency of ocular adverse events associated with selinexor with a goal to quantify the occurrence of these events in our investigator-initiated trial.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 174 patients treated with at least one dose of selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents between July 2015 and July 2020 at a comprehensive cancer center in the U.S. All reported ocular adverse events were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 174 patient medical records were reviewed. All patients received at least one dose of selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents in our cohort of patients with advanced malignancies. A total of 34 (19.54%) patients experienced 37 ocular adverse events. The most frequently reported ocular symptom was blurred vision, which was reported in 22 (12.64%) patients. The most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event was dry eye syndrome reported in 21 (12.1%) patients, and 19 (10.9%) of them were diagnosed with mild dry eye. The second most common treatment-related adverse event was the progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis (cataract) reported in 7 (4.0%) patients. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight that ocular adverse events associated with oral selinexor were mild. The most frequently reported ocular treatment-related adverse events were mild dry eye and progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Patients receiving selinexor in combination with multiple standard chemotherapy or immunotherapy agents were reviewed, with a total of 34 patients experiencing 37 ocular adverse events. Findings highlight that ocular adverse events associated with oral selinexor were mild. The most frequently reported ocular treatment-related adverse events were mild dry eye and progression of age-related nuclear sclerosis. None of the ocular adverse events required therapy discontinuation.

Radiomics analysis for predicting pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancers

BACKGROUND

We present a radiomics-based model for predicting response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced rare cancers.

METHODS

The study included 57 patients with advanced rare cancers who were enrolled in our phase II clinical trial of pembrolizumab. Tumor response was evaluated using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and immune-related RECIST (irRECIST). Patients were categorized as 20 "controlled disease" (stable disease, partial response, or complete response) or 37 progressive disease). We used 3D-slicer to segment target lesions on standard-of-care, pretreatment contrast enhanced CT scans. We extracted 610 features (10 histogram-based features and 600 second-order texture features) from each volume of interest. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression was used to detect the most discriminatory features. Selected features were used to create a classification model, using XGBoost, for the prediction of tumor response to pembrolizumab. Leave-one-out cross-validation was performed to assess model performance.

FINDINGS

The 10 most relevant radiomics features were selected; XGBoost-based classification successfully differentiated between controlled disease (complete response, partial response, stable disease) and progressive disease with high accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity in patients assessed by RECIST (94.7%, 97.3%, and 90%, respectively; p<0.001) and in patients assessed by irRECIST (94.7%, 93.9%, and 95.8%, respectively; p<0.001). Additionally, the common features of the RECIST and irRECIST groups also highly predicted pembrolizumab response with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and p value of 94.7%, 97%, 90%, p<0.001% and 96%, 96%, 95%, p<0.001, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our radiomics-based signature identified imaging differences that predicted pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancer.

INTERPRETATION

Our radiomics-based signature identified imaging differences that predicted pembrolizumab response in patients with advanced rare cancer.

Phase I Study of Everolimus, Letrozole, and Trastuzumab in Patients with Hormone Receptor-positive Metastatic Breast Cancer or Other Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

Doublets of everolimus with letrozole or trastuzumab have demonstrated activity against HER2-positive breast cancer, suggesting that the triple combination can have synergistic anticancer activity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This first-in-human dose-escalation study (NCT02152943) enrolled patients with hormone receptor- positive, HER2-positive (defined by amplification, overexpression, or mutation) treatment-refractory advanced cancers to receive escalating doses (3+3 design) of daily oral letrozole (days 1-21), daily oral everolimus (days 1-21), and intravenous trastuzumab (day 1) every 21 days to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and MTD or recommended phase II dose (RP2D).

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive (amplification, n = 27; overexpression, n = 1; and mutation, n = 4) advanced breast cancer (n = 26) or other cancers (n = 6) were enrolled. The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events included hyperglycemia (n = 4), anemia (n = 3), thrombocytopenia (n = 2), and mucositis (n = 2). DLTs included grade 3 mucositis and grade 4 neutropenia, and trastuzumab given as an 8 mg/kg loading dose on day 1 of cycle 1 followed by a 6 mg/kg maintenance dose on day 1 of subsequent cycles plus 10 mg everolimus daily and 2.5 mg letrozole daily every 21 days was declared as RP2D. Five patients with breast cancer (four with HER2 amplification and one with HER2 mutation) had partial responses. HER2 amplification in circulating cell-free DNA at baseline was associated with shorter progression-free and overall survival durations (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Everolimus, letrozole, and trastuzumab have a favorable safety profile and elicit encouraging signals of anticancer activity in patients with heavily pretreated hormone receptor- and HER2-positive advanced cancers.