The prognostic significance of maximum standardized uptake value of primary tumor in surgically treated non-small-cell lung cancer patients: analysis of 413 cases

Prognostic Significance of PD-L1 Expression and Standardized Uptake Values in the Primary Lesions of Stage IV Adenocarcinoma Lung Cancer

Background

This study evaluated the prognostic ability of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) in patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma lung cancer to detect protein death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels.

Methods

In total, 86 patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma lung cancer underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging and PD-L1 expression evaluation before treatment from February 2019 to November 2020 at Bach Mai Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam. The assessed patient characteristics in this study included sex, age, smoking status, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, PD-L1 expression level, survival status, tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) stage, and metastasis locations.

Results

The average age was 62.23 ± 9.51 years, and men and women represented 67.4% and 32.6% of the population, respectively. The EGFR mutation rate was 36%. PD-L1 expression was negative (detected in <1% of the tumor) in 40.7% of cases and positive in 59.3% of cases (detected in 1–49% of the tumor in 32.6%; detected in ≥50% of the tumor in 26.7%). The mean maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) was 11.09 ± 3.94. SUV_max was significantly higher in PD-L1–positive tumors than in PD-L1–negative tumors (12.24 ± 4.01 and 9.43 ± 3.22, respectively; p = 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of SUVmax was 0.681 (95% confidence interval 0.570–0.793, p = 0.004). Compared with PD-L1–negative cases, SUV_max was significantly different in all PD-L1–positive cases (p = 0.001), weakly PD-L1–positive cases (1–49%, p = 0.005), and strongly PD-L1–positive cases (≥50%, p = 0.003). PD-L1 expression levels were significantly associated with SUV_max (p = 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.022), and EGFR mutation status (p = 0.045).

Conclusions

SUV_max in the primary lesions was able to predict PD-L1 expression and may play a role in predicting PD-L1 immunotherapy efficacy in patients with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma.

Combining PD-L1 Expression and Standardized Uptake Values in FDG-PET/CT Can Predict Prognosis in Patients With Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background

This study aimed to determine the relationship of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and standardized uptake values in fluorodeoxyglucose–positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) with prognosis in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 328 NSCLC patients who underwent lobectomy/segmentectomy with lymph node dissection. PD-L1 expression was detected by immunohistochemically stained using the murine monoclonal antibody clone 22C3. The preoperative maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) of FDG-PET/CT at the primary lesion; pathological factors including histological type, microscopic lymphatic, venous, and pleural invasion; and lymph node metastases in resected specimens was determined. Significant prognostic clinicopathologic factors were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

PD-L1 expression was higher in men, smokers, squamous cell carcinoma, advanced pathologic stages, positive venous invasion, positive pleural invasion, and high preoperative SUV_max (≥3). Postoperative survival analysis showed that both PD-L1 expression and preoperative SUV_max were significantly negative prognostic factors in univariate analysis for overall survival (OS) (P = 0.0123 and P < 0.0001) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (P = 0.0012 and P < 0.0001). Kaplan–Meier survival curves showed that the OS and RFS were the best in patients with negative PD-L1 expression and SUV_max < 3, intermediate in patients with positive PD-L1 expression and SUV_max < 3 and those with negative PD-L1 expression and SUV_max ≥ 3, and poor in patients with positive PD-L1 expression and SUV_max ≥ 3.

Conclusion

Combining PD-L1 expression and preoperative FDG-PET/CT SUV_max in primary tumor might help in accurate prediction of postoperative prognosis in NSCLC patients.

Prognostic Significance of SUVmax Combined With Lactate Dehydrogenase in Advanced Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Plus Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

This research aims to investigate the predictive capacity of PET/CT quantitative parameters combined with haematological parameters in advanced lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 120 patients who underwent ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) were enrolled before therapy. The following parameters were calculated: the maximum, mean, and peak standardized uptake value (SUVmax, SUVmean, and SUVpeak, respectively); total tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG); and whole-body metabolic values (MTVwb, TLGwb, SUVmeanwb, and SUVmaxwb). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, absolute neutrophil count, absolute platelet count, albumin levels and derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) were also computed. The associations between the variables and therapy outcome (evaluated by iRECIST) were analyzed.

Results

Based on iRECIST, 32 of 120 patients showed iPD, 43 iSD, 36 iPR and 9 iCR. Multivariate analysis found that SUVmax, MTVwb, LDH and absolute platelet count were associated with treatment response (P =0.015, P =0.005, P <0.001 and P =0.015, respectively). Kaplan-Meier survival analyses showed that SUVmax ≥11.42 and LDH ≥245 U/L were associated with shorter OS (P = 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that SUVmax and LDH alone were not correlated with survival prognosis (p>0.05), but the combination of SUVmax and LDH was independently associated with OS (P=0.015, P=0.001, respectively). The median survival time (MST) for the low (LDH<245 and SUVmax<11.42), intermediate(LDH<245 or SUVmax<11.42), and high(SUVmax≥11.42 and LDH≥245) groups was 24.10 months (95% CI: 19.43 to 28.77), 17.41 months (95% CI: 15.83 to 18.99), and 13.76 months (95% CI: 12.51 to 15.02), respectively.

Conclusion

This study identified that SUVmax plus LDH correlated with the survival outcome in patients with advanced lung cancer receiving PD-1/PD-L1 blockade plus chemotherapy.

Combined prognostic value of the SUVmax derived from FDG-PET and the lymphocyte-monocyte ratio in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy

Background

We evaluated the prognostic potential of tumor ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake derived from positron emission tomography (PET) and known inflammatory hematological markers, both individually and in combination, for chemosensitivity and survival in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving first-line chemotherapy.

Methods

A total of 149 patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC (based on TNM 7th edition) were retrospectively reviewed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) were used to quantitatively assess FDG uptake. The lymphocyte-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were selected as hematological markers. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed for the determination of optimal cut-off values to predict chemotherapeutic response.

Results

Patients with SUVmax > 11.6 or LMR ≤3.73 exhibited a significantly lower objective response rate (ORR) to chemotherapy (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001). Through multivariable logistic regression analysis, both the SUVmax and LMR were identified as independent predictive factors for chemotherapeutic response (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001). Furthermore, a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model identified a high SUVmax (> 11.6) and low LMR (≤3.73) as independent predictors of poor PFS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.025) and OS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.032). A novel score system was constructed based on the SUVmax and LMR (SUV_LMR score), and patients were stratified into three subgroups. The patients with a score of 0 had a significantly higher ORR (88.9%) than did those with a score of 1 (59.6%) and score of 2 (25.0%) (p < 0.001). Moreover, multivariable Cox analysis further identified the SUV_LMR score as an independent prognostic factor for PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Pre-treatment SUVmax and LMR were not only predictive factors for chemotherapeutic response but also independent prognostic factors of survival in stage IIIB-IV NSCLC. Moreover, the SUV_LMR score, which is based on primary tumor metabolic activity and the systemic inflammatory response, might provide a promising tool to predict chemosensitivity, recurrence and survival of advanced NSCLC.

Effect of aspirin on PET parameters in primary non-small cell lung cancer and its relationship with prognosis

Background

18 F-FDG is a glucose analogue whose metabolic index SUV can effectively reflect the metabolic level of tumor microenvironment. Aspirin can affect the uptake of 18F-FDG by cancer cells, reducing the SUVmax value of primary tumors, exerting antitumor effect. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of long-term aspirin and the relationship between aspirin intake and PET parameters value of primary tumor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Eighty-one NSCLC patients were recruited and divided into two groups: aspirin medication group and control group, who underwent surgery and had pathological diagnosis data between January 2012 and December 2016. Clinical characteristics were retrospective analyzed to evaluate the possibility of clinical prognosis, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazard model were applied to evaluate the predictors of prognosis.

Results

The PET/CT SUVmax of the primary tumor in the aspirin group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the SUVmax, SUVmean and TLG of the primary tumor in aspirin group were lower, but the MTV value had no significant difference. Cox regression analysis showed that N stage and TNM stage were predictors of the prognosis. There was a significant difference in the use of aspirin in NSCLC patients.

Conclusion

Aspirin can reduce SUVmax, SUVmean and TLG in primary tumor and aspirin can improve the prognosis of patients with NSCLC.

Primary tumor standardized uptake value (SUVmax) measured on 18F-FDG PET/CT and mixed NSCLC components predict survival in surgical-resected combined small-cell lung cancer

Purpose

The combined small-cell lung cancer (c-SCLC) is rare and has unique clinicopathological futures. The aim of this study is to investigate ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT parameters and clinicopathological factors that influence the prognosis of c-SCLC.

Methods

Between November 2005 and October 2014, surgical-resected tumor samples from c-SCLC patients who received preoperative ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT examination were retrospectively reviewed. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) were used to evaluate metabolic parameters in primary tumors. The survivals were evaluated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate potential prognostic factors.

Results

Thirty-one patients were enrolled, with a median age of 62 (range: 35 − 79) years. The most common mixed component was squamous cell carcinoma (SCC, n = 12), followed by large-cell carcinoma (LCC, n = 7), adenocarcinoma (AC, n = 6), spindle cell carcinoma (n = 4), adenosquamous carcinoma (n = 1) and atypical carcinoid (n = 1). The median follow-up period was 53.0 (11.0–142.0) months; the 5-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival(PFS) rate were 48.4% and 35.5%, respectively. Univariate survival analysis showed that gender, smoking history, tumor location were associated with PFS (P = 0.036, P = 0.043, P = 0.048), SUVmax and TNM stage were closely related to PFS in both Mixed SCC and non-SCC component groups (P = 0.007, P = 0.048). SUV_max, smoking history, tumor size and mixed SCC component were influencing factors of OS in patients (P = 0.040, P = 0.041, P = 0.046, P = 0.029). Multivariate survival analysis confirmed that TNM stage (HR = 2.885, 95%CI: 1.323–6.289, P = 0.008) was the most significantly influential factor for PFS. High SUV_max value (HR = 9.338, 95%CI: 2.426–35.938, P = 0.001) and mixed SCC component (HR = 0.155, 95%CI: 0.045–0.530, P = 0.003) were poor predictors for OS.

Conclusion

Surgical-resected c-SCLCs have a relatively good prognosis. TNM stage is the most significant factor influencing disease progression in surgical-resected c-SCLCs. SUVmax and mixed NSCLC components within c-SCLCs had a considerable influence on the survival. Both high SUVmax and mixed SCC component are poor predictors for patients with c-SCLCs.

New insight on the correlation of metabolic status on 18F-FDG PET/CT with immune marker expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Metabolic information obtained through ¹⁸F-flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) is used to evaluate malignancy by calculating the glucose uptake rate, and these parameters play important roles in determining the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The expression of immune-related markers in tumor tissue reflects the immune status in the tumor microenvironment. However, there is lack of reports on the association between metabolic variables and intra-tumor immune markers. Herein, we investigate the correlation between metabolic status on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and intra-tumor immunomarkers' expression in NSCLC patients.

METHODS

From April 2008 to August 2014, 763 patients were enrolled in the analysis to investigate the role of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in lung cancer. One hundred twenty-two tumor specimens were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) to intra-tumor immune cells and programmed death protein ligand 1(PD-L1) expression on tumor cells. The correlation between metabolic variables and the expression of tissue immune markers were analyzed.

RESULTS

SUVmax values have significant variations in different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) statuses (wild type vs mutant type), high/low neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) groups, and high/low platelets-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) groups (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.003, respectively). SUVmax was an independent prognostic factor in lung cancer patients (p = 0.013). IHC demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between SUVmax and the expression of CD8 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (p = 0.015), CD163 tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) (p = 0.003), and Foxp3-regulatory T cells (Tregs) (p = 0.004), as well as PD-1 and PD-L1 (p = 0.003 and p = 0.012, respectively). With respect to patient outcomes, disease stage, BMI, SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), TLG (tumor lesion glycolysis), CD163-TAMs, CD11c-dendritic cells (DCs), PD-L1, and Tregs showed a statistically significant correlation with progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.001, 0.023, < 0.001, 0.007, 0.005, 0.004, 0.008, 0.048, and 0.014, respectively), and disease stage, SUVmax, MTV, TLG, CD163-TAMs, CD11c-DCs, and PD-L1 showed a statistically significant correlation with overall survival (OS) (p < 0.001, < 0.001, 0.014, 0.012, < 0.001, 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed an association between metabolic variable and immune cell expression in the tumor microenvironment and suggests that SUVmax on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT could be a potential predictor for selecting candidates for immunotherapy.

Pretreatment SUVmax value to predict outcome in patients with stage III NSCLC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE:

Stage III disease accounts for approximately one-fourth of all non-metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The patients who are not candidates for curative resection are offered concomitant chemoradiotherapy. In this subgroup, which is difficult to manage, studies that address the role of PET-CT to predict outcome measures specifically for stage III NSCLC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy may help better risk stratification. This study aimed to assess whether baseline PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) value in stage III NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy would independently identify patients with high risk of progression and death.

METHODS:

The study population consisted of patients aged 18 years or more with unresectable stage III histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From 2007 to 2014, medical records of patients admitted to our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Pretreatment PET-CT SUV_max values were recorded for each patient. These values were categorized as low or high according to the median SUV_max measure of the study population.

RESULTS:

A total of 175 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up time was 23 months (range 6–109). The PET-CT SUV_max values ranged from 3.5 to 46 with a median value of 14. The median overall survival was 25 months in SUV_max <14 and 18 months in SUV_max ≥14 group (p=0.023). The median progression-free survival was 16 months in SUV_max <14 and 11 months in SUV_max ≥14 group (p=0.033). Multivariate analysis revealed that both PET-CT SUV_max value (p<0.001) and age (p=0.016) were independent significant predictors for overall survival (OS).

CONCLUSION:

The results of this study involving patients with stage III NSCLC receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy provide evidence that suggests that high values of pretreatment SUV_max, an indicator of metabolic tumor burden, predicted a higher risk of disease progression and death.

Prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression and 18F-FDG PET/CT in surgical pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is commonly observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The prognostic value of PD-L1 expression and the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (¹⁸FDG-PET) in surgical pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma(SCC)remains unclear. Furthermore, the correlation between the SUVmax and PD-L1 expression has not been assessed. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation between PD-L1 expression and the SUVmax on ¹⁸FDG-PET and to examine the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression and the SUVmax in surgical pulmonary SCC. Expression of PD-L1 was examined in 84 patients with resected SCC using immunohistochemistry. Positive PD-L1 expression in tumour cells was observed in 58.3% (49/84) of patients with SCC. High PD-L1 expression levels were significantly correlated with histological differentiation (P=0.006), and a high SUVmax was associated with histological differentiation (P=0.037), and lymph node metastasis (P=0.025). Spearman's test showed that there was a significant correlation between PD-L1 expression levels and the SUVmax. High PD-L1 expression levels and a high SUVmax were both independent risks factors for poor overall survival. Our results suggested that high PD-L1 expression levels and a high SUVmax was associated with poor prognosis in surgical pulmonary SCC. The existence of a statistically significant correlation between the SUVmax and PD-L1 expression levels justifies exploring the usefulness of the SUVmax as a predictor of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor activity.

[Analysis of the Role of PET/CT SUVmax in Prognosis and Its Correlation with Clinicopathological Characteristics in Resectable Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma]

背景与目的

肺癌居于全球男性及女性癌症相关死亡原因的首位，大多数患者在确诊时已属晚期，5年生存率仅为18%。肺癌可分为非小细胞肺癌（non-small cell lung carcinoma, NSCLC）和小细胞癌（small cell lung carcinoma, SCLC），其中NSCLC占肺癌的80%-85%，NSCLC根据组织学可主要分为腺癌（约占40%），鳞状细胞癌（20%-30%）和大细胞癌（10%），针对驱动基因的靶向治疗在肺腺癌中取得一定成绩，但在肺鳞癌的治疗中收效甚微，肺鳞癌的诊治更需得到关注，¹⁸F-脱氧葡萄糖（fluorodeoxyglucose, FDG）正电子发射断层扫描/计算机体层摄影（positron emission tomography/computed tomography, PET/CT）越来越多地应用于肺癌的诊断与分期中，本研究旨在探讨¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT原发灶最大标准摄取值（maximum standardized uptake value, SUVmax）在肺鳞癌患者术后预后中的意义及与临床病理特征的关系。

方法

回顾分析2005年5月-2014年10月收治的182例初治、接受PET/CT检查、行根治术的原发肺鳞癌患者的临床影像病理及随访资料。采用Kaplan-Meier法及Cox模型分析患者生存情况，并分析原发灶SUVmax与各临床病理因素的关系。

结果

182例肺鳞癌患者原发灶SUVmax以13.0为界分为两组，SUVmax > 13.0组与≤13.0组患者的中位总生存期分别为56个月和87个月，差异具有统计学意义（P=0.022）。原发灶SUVmax与性别、肿瘤最大径、肿瘤-淋巴结-转移（tumor-node-metastasis, TNM）分期、中性粒细胞、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比例（neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, NLR）存在正相关性，与血红蛋白呈负相关（P < 0.05）。Cox多因素分析显示SUVmax（HR=1.714, 95%CI: 1.021-2.876, P=0.042）、TNM分期（HR=1.677, 95%CI: 1.231-2.284, P=0.001）均为患者生存的独立预后影响因子，提示SUVmax有独立于病理TNM分期之外的预后价值。而且，SUVmax在Ⅰ期肺鳞癌患者的预后中有意义（P=0.045）。

结论

PET/CT SUVmax对肺鳞癌患者术后生存的预测有重要的价值，是独立于TNM分期之外的一个重要预后因素，并且原发灶SUVmax与多个临床病理因素间存在相关性。

Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Surgical Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Background

The identification of surgical non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with poor prognosis is a priority in clinical oncology because of their high 5-year mortality. This meta-analysis explored the prognostic value of maximal standardized uptake value (SUV_max), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in surgical NSCLC patients.

Materials and Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Libraries were systematically searched until August 1, 2015. Prospective or retrospective studies that evaluated the prognostic roles of preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT with complete DFS and OS data in surgical NSCLC patients were included. The impact of SUV_max, MTV or TLG on survival was measured using hazard ratios (HR). Sub-group analyses were performed based on disease stage, pathological classification, surgery only and cut-off values.

Results

Thirty-six studies comprised of 5807 patients were included. The combined HRs for DFS were 2.74 (95%CI 2.33–3.24, unadjusted) and 2.43 (95%CI: 1.76–3.36, adjusted) for SUV_max, 2.27 (95%CI 1.77–2.90, unadjusted) and 2.49 (95%CI 1.23–5.04, adjusted) for MTV, and 2.46 (95%CI 1.91–3.17, unadjusted) and 2.97 (95%CI 1.68–5.28, adjusted) for TLG. The pooled HRs for OS were 2.54 (95%CI 1.86–3.49, unadjusted) and 1.52 (95%CI 1.16–2.00, adjusted) for SUV_max, 2.07 (95%CI 1.16–3.69, unadjusted) and 1.91 (95%CI 1.13–3.22, adjusted) for MTV, and 2.47 (95%CI 1.38–4.43, unadjusted) and 1.94 (95%CI 1.12–3.33, adjusted) for TLG. Begg’s test detected publication bias, the trim and fill procedure was performed, and similar HRs were obtained. The prognostic role of SUV_max, MTV and TLG remained similar in the sub-group analyses.

Conclusions

High values of SUV_max, MTV and TLG predicted a higher risk of recurrence or death in patients with surgical NSCLC. We suggest the use of FDG PET/CT to select patients who are at high risk of disease recurrence or death and may benefit from aggressive treatments.

(18)F-FDG PET/CT mean SUV and metabolic tumor volume for mean survival time in non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The study was designed to determine the relationship between survival time of standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and examine the impact of demographic, clinical, and radiological data of these patients on survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of the records of 79 patients with NSCLC who presented to our hospital between May 2010 and March 2013, received a final diagnosis, and underwent F-FDG PET/CT for staging. Clinical, radiological, and F-FDG PET/CT parameters with an impact on prognosis such as the SUVmax of the primary tumor as calculated by the volumetric region of interest in the F-FDG PET/CT scans during initial diagnosis, mean SUV of the tumor, and MTV obtained with a threshold of SUVmax greater than 2.5 were recorded and statistically analyzed. A statistical analysis was carried out based on the clinical, radiological, and PET/CT findings of the patients who were divided into 2 groups: survivors and nonsurvivors.

RESULTS

Seventy patients (88.6%) were men, and 9 (11.4%) were women. The mean age was 63.65 ± 11.51 years in the nonsurvivor group (n = 40) versus 62.74 ± 10.60 years in the survivor group (n = 39) (Table 1). The mean survival time from diagnosis was 7.9 ± 6.52 months in the nonsurvivor group versus 14.09 ± 7.41 months in the survivor group. The mean survival time was 12.9 ± 7.9 months for those aged 60 or younger, whereas it was 9.9 ± 7.2 years for those aged 60 or older. According to the Cox regression analysis, higher MTV [relative risk (RR), 1.006; P = 0.03] and mean SUVmax (mSUV) (RR, 1.302; P = 0.03) had a significant impact on shortening of the mean survival time. However, no statistical significance was reached for SUVmax measurements (RR, 0.970; P = 0.39). Furthermore, there was a significant relationship between increased tumor size (<2 cm, 2-4 cm, and ≥4 cm) and shortened mean survival time (P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that MTV and mSUV of FDG PET/CT scans of the tumor, but not SUVmax, had a significant impact on survival time of patients with NSCLC. Based on this result, we believe that we might have more accurate information about the survival time of our patients if we also evaluate mSUV and MTV in combination with mSUV, which is frequently used for diagnosis and monitoring of patients with NSCLC during our daily practice.

Use of FDG PET/CT in Patients with Pancoast Tumors: Does It Add Any Contribution to Patient Management?

PURPOSE

To evaluate any potential value of 2-deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose with positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (FDG PET/CT) in staging of patients with Pancoast tumors and to investigate the relationship between volume-based quantitative PET parameters and prognosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed data of the 47 patients with Pancoast tumors who underwent initial staging by conventional imaging methods and FDG PET/CT. FDG-PET images were visually and quantitatively evaluated, and metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis, and maximum standardized uptake values of primary tumors were calculated. The correlations between quantitative PET parameters and tumor stages, as well as overall survival, were analyzed.

RESULTS

By detecting unknown distant metastasis, PET/CT upstaged 21% of patients. The sensitivity and specificity for detection of lymphatic involvement were 100% and 83.75%, respectively. Having surgery (p = 0.01) and being at an early stage (p = 0.004) were the most predictive factors for overall survival. Although there was no significant correlation between quantitative PET parameters and overall survival, MTV was the most powerful discriminator for operability and preoperative staging (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET imaging was found to be a valuable method for an accurate staging in the management of patients with Pancoast tumor. Having surgery and being at an early stage at presentation were found to be significant predictors for survival. Quantitative metabolic parameters may contribute to clarification of operable patient subgroups having an early disease stage with low MTV.

Evaluation of elastix-based propagated align algorithm for VOI- and voxel-based analysis of longitudinal (18)F-FDG PET/CT data from patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Background

Deformable image registration allows volume of interest (VOI)- and voxel-based analysis of longitudinal changes in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) tumor uptake in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study evaluates the performance of the elastix toolbox deformable image registration algorithm for VOI and voxel-wise assessment of longitudinal variations in FDG tumor uptake in NSCLC patients.

Methods

Evaluation of the elastix toolbox was performed using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT at baseline and after 2 cycles of therapy (follow-up) data in advanced NSCLC patients. The elastix toolbox, an integrated part of the IMALYTICS workstation, was used to apply a CT-based non-linear image registration of follow-up PET/CT data using the baseline PET/CT data as reference. Lesion statistics were compared to assess the impact on therapy response assessment. Next, CT-based deformable image registration was performed anew on the deformed follow-up PET/CT data using the original follow-up PET/CT data as reference, yielding a realigned follow-up PET dataset. Performance was evaluated by determining the correlation coefficient between original and realigned follow-up PET datasets. The intra- and extra-thoracic tumors were automatically delineated on the original PET using a 41% of maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) adaptive threshold. Equivalence between reference and realigned images was tested (determining 95% range of the difference) and estimating the percentage of voxel values that fell within that range.

Results

Thirty-nine patients with 191 tumor lesions were included. In 37/39 and 12/39 patients, respectively, thoracic and non-thoracic lesions were evaluable for response assessment. Using the EORTC/SUV_max-based criteria, 5/37 patients had a discordant response of thoracic, and 2/12 a discordant response of non-thoracic lesions between the reference and the realigned image. FDG uptake values of corresponding tumor voxels in the original and realigned reference PET correlated well (R²=0.98). Using equivalence testing, 94% of all the voxel values fell within the 95% range of the difference between original and realigned reference PET.

Conclusions

The elastix toolbox impacts lesion statistics and therefore therapy response assessment in a clinically significant way. The elastix toolbox is therefore not applicable in its current form and/or standard settings for PET response evaluation. Further optimization and validation of this technique is necessary prior to clinical implementation.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13550-015-0089-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A major determinant of treatment offered to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is their intrathoracic (mediastinal) nodal status. If the disease has not spread to the ipsilateral mediastinal nodes, subcarinal (N2) nodes, or both, and the patient is otherwise considered fit for surgery, resection is often the treatment of choice. Planning the optimal treatment is therefore critically dependent on accurate staging of the disease. PET-CT (positron emission tomography-computed tomography) is a non-invasive staging method of the mediastinum, which is increasingly available and used by lung cancer multidisciplinary teams. Although the non-invasive nature of PET-CT constitutes one of its major advantages, PET-CT may be suboptimal in detecting malignancy in normal-sized lymph nodes and in ruling out malignancy in patients with coexisting inflammatory or infectious diseases.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of integrated PET-CT for mediastinal staging of patients with suspected or confirmed NSCLC that is potentially suitable for treatment with curative intent.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following databases up to 30 April 2013: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via OvidSP (from 1946), Embase via OvidSP (from 1974), PreMEDLINE via OvidSP, OpenGrey, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, and the trials register www.clinicaltrials.gov. There were no language or publication status restrictions on the search. We also contacted researchers in the field, checked reference lists, and conducted citation searches (with an end-date of 9 July 2013) of relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Prospective or retrospective cross-sectional studies that assessed the diagnostic accuracy of integrated PET-CT for diagnosing N2 disease in patients with suspected resectable NSCLC. The studies must have used pathology as the reference standard and reported participants as the unit of analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data pertaining to the study characteristics and the number of true and false positives and true and false negatives for the index test, and they independently assessed the quality of the included studies using QUADAS-2. We calculated sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each study and performed two main analyses based on the criteria for test positivity employed: Activity > background or SUVmax ≥ 2.5 (SUVmax = maximum standardised uptake value), where we fitted a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve using a hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) model for each subset of studies. We identified the average operating point on the SROC curve and computed the average sensitivities and specificities. We checked for heterogeneity and examined the robustness of the meta-analyses through sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 45 studies, and based on the criteria for PET-CT positivity, we categorised the included studies into three groups: Activity > background (18 studies, N = 2823, prevalence of N2 and N3 nodes = 679/2328), SUVmax ≥ 2.5 (12 studies, N = 1656, prevalence of N2 and N3 nodes = 465/1656), and Other/mixed (15 studies, N = 1616, prevalence of N2 to N3 nodes = 400/1616). None of the studies reported (any) adverse events. Under-reporting generally hampered the quality assessment of the studies, and in 30/45 studies, the applicability of the study populations was of high or unclear concern.The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates for the 'Activity > background PET-CT positivity criterion were 77.4% (95% CI 65.3 to 86.1) and 90.1% (95% CI 85.3 to 93.5), respectively, but the accuracy estimates of these studies in ROC space showed a wide prediction region. This indicated high between-study heterogeneity and a relatively large 95% confidence region around the summary value of sensitivity and specificity, denoting a lack of precision. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the overall estimate of sensitivity was especially susceptible to selection bias; reference standard bias; clear definition of test positivity; and to a lesser extent, index test bias and commercial funding bias, with lower combined estimates of sensitivity observed for all the low 'Risk of bias' studies compared with the full analysis.The summary sensitivity and specificity estimates for the SUVmax ≥ 2.5 PET-CT positivity criterion were 81.3% (95% CI 70.2 to 88.9) and 79.4% (95% CI 70 to 86.5), respectively.In this group, the accuracy estimates of these studies in ROC space also showed a very wide prediction region. This indicated very high between-study heterogeneity, and there was a relatively large 95% confidence region around the summary value of sensitivity and specificity, denoting a clear lack of precision. Sensitivity analyses suggested that both overall accuracy estimates were marginally sensitive to flow and timing bias and commercial funding bias, which both lead to slightly lower estimates of sensitivity and specificity.Heterogeneity analyses showed that the accuracy estimates were significantly influenced by country of study origin, percentage of participants with adenocarcinoma, (¹⁸F)-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) dose, type of PET-CT scanner, and study size, but not by study design, consecutive recruitment, attenuation correction, year of publication, or tuberculosis incidence rate per 100,000 population.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review has shown that accuracy of PET-CT is insufficient to allow management based on PET-CT alone. The findings therefore support National Institute for Health and Care (formally 'clinical') Excellence (NICE) guidance on this topic, where PET-CT is used to guide clinicians in the next step: either a biopsy or where negative and nodes are small, directly to surgery. The apparent difference between the two main makes of PET-CT scanner is important and may influence the treatment decision in some circumstances. The differences in PET-CT accuracy estimates between scanner makes, NSCLC subtypes, FDG dose, and country of study origin, along with the general variability of results, suggest that all large centres should actively monitor their accuracy. This is so that they can make reliable decisions based on their own results and identify the populations in which PET-CT is of most use or potentially little value.

Potential impact of atelectasis and primary tumor glycolysis on F-18 FDG PET/CT on survival in lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Atelectasis is an important prognostic factor that can cause pleuritic chest pain, coughing or dyspnea, and even may be a cause of death. In this study, we aimed to investigate the potential impact of atelectasis and PET parameters on survival and the relation between atelectasis and PET parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study consisted of patients with lung cancer with or without atelectasis who underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT examination before receiving any treatment. (18)F-FDG PET/CT derived parameters including tumor size, SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, total lesion glycosis (TLG), SUV mean of atelectasis area, atelectasis volume, and histological and TNM stage were considered as potential prognostic factors for overall survival.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive lung cancer patients (22 patients with atelectasis and 28 patients without atelectasis, median age of 65 years) were evaluated in the present study. There was no relationship between tumor size and presence or absence of atelectasis, nor between presence/absence of atelectasis and TLG of primary tumors. The overall one-year survival rate was 83% and median survival was 20 months (n=22) in the presence of atelectasis; the overall one-year survival rate was 65.7% (n=28) and median survival was 16 months (p=0.138) in the absence of atelectasis. With respect to PFS; the one-year survival rate of AT+ patients was 81.8% and median survival was 19 months; the one-year survival rate of AT- patients was 64.3% and median survival was 16 months (p=0.159). According to univariate analysis, MTV, TLG and tumor size were significant risk factors for PFS and OS (p<0.05). However, SUVmax was not a significant factor for PFS and OS (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study suggested that total lesion glycolysis and metabolic tumor volume were important predictors of survival in lung cancer patients, in contrast to SUVmax. In addition, having a segmental lung atelectasis seems not to be a significant factor on survival.