Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Targeted Immunotherapy for Multiple Myeloma

Rapid Administration of Antibiotics for Reducing Fever Days in Patients Receiving Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Background and Objectives: Neutropenic fever (NF) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). To date, no study has discussed the relationship of fever days in HSCT with the time between recording the fever and administering antibiotics. This study aimed to examine the association between fever days in HSCT and the time interval between recording the fever and intravenous (IV) antibiotics to the febrile neutropenia patient. Materials and Methods: A total of 22 patients who developed NF after HSCT in one hospital were analyzed. Patients who received IV antibiotics injection within 30 min were categorized in group A and those who received the injection after 30 min were categorized in group B. Fever was defined by an attack with an oral temperature of 38.3 °C. Patients’ characteristics and possible risk factors were recorded and analyzed. Results: Groups A and B had 14 and 8 patients, respectively. Patient characteristics, including age, diagnosis, sex, and antibiotics level, were similar between the two groups. The median duration of fever days was 1.5 (range, 1−5) in group A and 6.5 (range, 1−14) in group B (p = 0.003). Multivariant analysis of possible independent impact factors of “fever days in HSCT” was performed. The odds ratio of “antibiotics given time” was 4.00 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.26 to 7.22, p = 0.001). The “antibiotics level” did not affect the NF period (odds ratio = −0.80, 95% CI = −2.40 to 1.07, p = 0.453). Conclusions: Rapid IV administration of antibiotics (<30 min after fever attack) can reduce the fever days in patients undergoing HSCT.

Costs of administration, travelling, and productivity losses associated with hospital administration of multiple myeloma drugs in Finland

AIM

To estimate the drug administration, travelling, and productivity costs associated with infusion or subcutaneous proteasome inhibitor (PI) treatments (specifically carfilzomib and bortezomib) for multiple myeloma (MM) patients in Finland.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Price tariffs of Finnish hospital districts are used as the basis of invoicing sent to healthcare service payers. A review of these price tariff lists was conducted and obtained data analysed to estimate the mean unit cost of PI administration visit. Travelling costs stratified by areas with different population densities were assessed, based on the national travelling reimbursement register data maintained by the Social Insurance Institution of Finland. Productivity costs due to time spent on administration visits and travelling were estimated based on an expert interview and a spatial healthcare accessibility analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen (95%) of the Finnish hospital districts were included in the review. Relevant unit cost information was found for 15 (75%) of the districts. The mean PI administration cost alone was 270€ (95% CI = 189€-351€) per administration and increased to 371€ when travelling costs were included. Productivity costs added, the mean PI administration costs totalled 405€ for bortezomib and 437€ for carfilzomib.

LIMITATIONS

The costing rationale of price tariffs may vary between hospital districts. Productivity costs were estimated conservatively, due to lack of data.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of intravenous or subcutaneous PIs to treat MM in healthcare facilities causes significant and potentially avoidable healthcare, travelling, and indirect costs, and they should be included in all health economic evaluations (HEEs). As the cost estimates utilized in this study represent most of central hospitals in the country, they provide useful information for future HEEs. A broader conclusion is that novel oral medications, such as the first oral PI, have a significant potential for reducing administration-related costs of subcutaneous or intravenous PIs.

Comparison of upfront tandem autologous-allogeneic transplantation versus reduced intensity allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma

We performed a retrospective analysis of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation database comparing the outcomes of multiple myeloma patients who received tandem autologous followed by allogeneic PSCT (auto-allo) with the outcomes of patients who underwent a reduced intensity conditioning allograft (early RIC) without prior autologous transplant. From 1996 to 2013, we identified a total of 690 patients: 517 patients were planned to receive auto-allo and 173 received an early RIC allograft without prior autologous transplant. With a median follow-up of 93 months, 5-year PFS survival was significantly better in the auto-allo group, 34% compared with 22% in the early RIC group (P<0.001). OS was also significantly improved in the auto-allo group with a 5-year rate of 59% vs 42% in the early RIC group (P=0.001). The non-relapse mortality rate was lower in the auto-allo group than in the early RIC group, with 1- and 3-year rates of 8% and 13% vs 20% and 28%, respectively (P<0.001). The relapse/progression rate was similar in the two groups, with 5-year rates of 50% for auto-allo and 46% for early RIC (P=0.42). These data suggest that planned tandem autologous allograft can improve overall survival compared with upfront RIC allograft alone in patients with multiple myeloma.