1
|
Zhang SC, Kim S, Steers J, Stiehl B, Silos KD, Grigsby G, Oorloff M, Upadhaya T, Vescio RA, Oveisi DR, Hakimian B, Atkins KM, Ballas LK. Irradiated Bone Marrow Volume is Associated with Hematologic Toxicity in Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)03509-0. [PMID: 39471903 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 11/01/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S) Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is effective for multiple myeloma (MM) but may cause cytopenia. Bone marrow volume receiving 10Gy (BMV10Gy) has been associated with hematologic toxicity (HT) in cervical cancer, but no studies have investigated this in MM. We hypothesized that absolute BMV10Gy is associated with acute HT in MM patients receiving palliative RT. MATERIALS/METHODS This single-institution retrospective analysis evaluated 125 MM patients who received palliative RT between 2007-2023 and had ≥ 2 weeks of follow up laboratory data. Lab values were recorded pre-RT, post-RT, and at nadir within 90 days of completing RT. Clinical HT was defined as new transfusion/growth factor, admission for hematologic toxicity, and/or systemic therapy pause/discontinuation. BM was defined as bone volume within RT field. BMV5-40Gy (cc) was recorded for each treatment. Logistic regressions were performed with clinical HT as the primary endpoint. RESULTS 105 (84%) patients received concurrent systemic therapy. Median BMV10Gy was 266cc (IQR 157-501cc). Median RT EqD2 was 26Gy (IQR 23-33Gy). On univariable analysis, BMV5Gy, BMV10Gy, and BMV15Gy were significantly associated with clinical HT (p=0.014, p=0.018, p=0.050, respectively) while RT EqD2 dose was not (p=0.997). On multivariable analysis, BMV10Gy was significantly associated with clinical HT (p=0.049) after adjusting for dose, number of lesions treated, lesion location (spine, pelvis, limb, soft tissue), and systemic therapy class. Disease course (number of prior systemic therapies) was significantly associated with clinical HT on univariable and multivariable analysis, with late relapsed/refractory patients (≥3 prior systemic therapies) having 9.6 higher odds of clinical HT compared to newly diagnosed patients (p<0.001). CONCLUSION To our knowledge, this is the first study to associate volume of irradiated BM with acute HT in MM. In addition to BM V5-15Gy, number of prior relapses and systemic therapy lines were significantly associated with HT. Disease history should be evaluated, and RT field volumes minimized for patients with poor bone marrow reserve (e.g., late relapsed/refractory disease).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel C Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Sungjin Kim
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Jennifer Steers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Bradley Stiehl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Katrina D Silos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Giana Grigsby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Maria Oorloff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Taman Upadhaya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Robert A Vescio
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - David R Oveisi
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Behrooz Hakimian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Katelyn M Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Leslie K Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gao S, Wang YT, Ma GY, Lu MQ, Chu B, Shi L, Fang LJ, Xiang QQ, Ding YH, Bao L. Solitary bone plasmacytoma: Long-term clinical outcomes in a single center. Curr Probl Cancer 2024; 50:101095. [PMID: 38598973 DOI: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2024.101095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 10/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A solitary plasmacytoma is classified into a solitary plasmacytoma of the bone (SBP) and a solitary extramedullary (soft tissue mass) plasmacytoma, based on the site of the lesion. Despite the high local control rate with radiotherapy, approximately half of patients' conditions progress to multiple myeloma (MM) within 3-5 years after diagnosis, with SBP having a worse prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively assessed the treatment and outcomes of patients with SBP in a hospital in China from 2008 to 2021. Twenty-four patients treated over 13 years with SBP were enrolled in this retrospective study. RESULTS The most common sites for SBP were the axial skeleton and femur. The M protein was detected in 11 patients (46 %), of which 8 (33 %) had light chains, 2 (8 %) had immunoglobulin G kappa and 1 (4 %) had immunoglobulin D kappa. Flow cytometry revealed that 5 patients (21 %) had minimal bone marrow involvement. The treatment included chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy in 18 (75 %), 12 (50 %), and 9 (38 %) patients, respectively, of whom 13 (54 %) received combined treatment. Over a median follow-up period of 67.2 months, 9 patients (38 %) developed MM in a median time of 101.5 months. The 5- and 10-year progression-free survival rates were 67.3 % and 37.4 %, respectively. One patient died due to pneumonia without progression and the other died due to relapse. CONCLUSION This study confirmed the high rate of progression of SBP to MM, indicating a need for adjunct chemotherapy for the management of SBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shan Gao
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China
| | - Yu-Tong Wang
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China
| | - Guang-Yu Ma
- Department of Hematology, The Forth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050035, China
| | - Min-Qiu Lu
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China
| | - Bin Chu
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China
| | - Lei Shi
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China
| | - Li-Juan Fang
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China
| | - Qiu-Qing Xiang
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China
| | - Yue-Hua Ding
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China
| | - Li Bao
- Department of Hematology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100035, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Oertel M, Schlusemann T, Shumilov E, Reinartz G, Bremer A, Rehn S, Lenz G, Khandanpour C, Eich HT. Radiotherapy in Combination with Systemic Therapy for Multiple Myeloma-A Critical Toxicity Evaluation in the Modern Treatment Era. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112909. [PMID: 37296874 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) is an established treatment modality in the management of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), aiming at analgesia and stabilization of osteolytic lesions. As a multifocal disease, the combined use of RT, systemic chemotherapy, and targeted therapy (ST) is pivotal to achieve better disease control. However, adding RT to ST may lead to increased toxicity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability of ST given concurrently with RT. Overall, 82 patients treated at our hematological center with a median follow-up of 60 months from initial diagnosis and 46.5 months from the start of RT were evaluated retrospectively. Toxicities were recorded from 30 days before RT up to 90 days after RT. 54 patients (65.9%) developed at least one non-hematological toxicity, with 50 patients (61.0%) showing low-grade (grade I or II) and 14 patients (17.1%) revealing high-grade (grade III and IV) toxicities. Hematological toxicities were documented in 50 patients (61.0%) before RT, 60 patients (73.2%) during RT, and 67 patients (81.7%) following RT. After RT, patients who had received ST during RT showed a significant increase in high-grade hematological toxicities (p = 0.018). In summary, RT can be safely implemented into modern treatment regimens for MM, but stringent monitoring of potential toxicities even after completion of RT has to be ensured.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Tom Schlusemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Evgenii Shumilov
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Gabriele Reinartz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Anne Bremer
- Department of Oncology, St. Franziskus-Hospital, Hohenzollernring 70, 48145 Muenster, Germany
| | - Stephan Rehn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Georg Lenz
- Department of Medicine A, Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Cyrus Khandanpour
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, University of Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Luebeck, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Osterhoff G, Kreinest M, Kuhnt T, Pohlenz C, Müller-Broich J, Röllig C, Teipel R, Scheyerer MJ, Schnake KJ, Spiegl UJA, Disch AC. Management of Pathological Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Multidisciplinary Recommendations. Global Spine J 2023; 13:85S-93S. [PMID: 37084345 PMCID: PMC10177308 DOI: 10.1177/21925682221143732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/23/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Mutlidisciplinary consensus recommendations for patients suffering from multiple myeloma (MM) involvement of the spinal column by the Spine Section of the German Association of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeons. OBJECTIVE To provide a comprehensive multidisciplinary diagnostic and therapeutic approach and to summarize the current literature on the management of pathological thoracolumbar vertebral fractures in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS Multidisciplinary recommendations using a classical consensus process provided by radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, orthopaedic- and trauma surgeons. A narrative literature review of the current diagnostic and treatment strategies was conducted. RESULTS Treatment decision has to be driven by a multidisciplinary team of oncologists, radiotherapists and spine surgeons. When considering surgery in MM patients, differing factors compared to other secondary spinal lesions have to be included into the decision process: probable neurological deterioration, the stage of the disease and prognosis, patient's general condition, localization and number of the lesions as well as patient's own wishes or expectations. Aiming to improve quality of life, the major goal of surgical treatment is to preserve mobility by reducing pain, secure neurological function and stability. CONCLUSION The goal of surgery is primarily to improve quality of life by restoring stability and neurological function. Interventions with an increased risk of complications due to MM-associated immunodeficiency must be avoided whenever feasible to allow early systemic treatment. Hence, treatment decisions should be based on a multidisciplinary team that considers patient's constitution and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg Osterhoff
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Kuhnt
- Department of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Clinic of Radiooncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Claudia Pohlenz
- Department of Imaging and Radiation Medicine, Clinic of Radiooncology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Röllig
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Raphael Teipel
- Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Universitätsklinikum, Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Max J Scheyerer
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Klaus John Schnake
- Center for Spinal and Scoliosis Surgery, Malteser Waldkrankenhaus St. Marien, Erlangen, Germany
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ulrich J A Spiegl
- Department of Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander C Disch
- University Comprehensive Spine Center, University Center for Orthopaedics, Trauma and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus at the TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Guerini AE, Tucci A, Alongi F, Mataj E, Belotti A, Borghetti P, Triggiani L, Pegurri L, Pedretti S, Bonù M, Tomasini D, Imbrescia J, Donofrio A, Facheris G, Singh N, Volpi G, Tomasi C, Magrini SM, Spiazzi L, Buglione M. RR Myelo POINT: A Retrospective Single-Center Study Assessing the Role of Radiotherapy in the Management of Multiple Myeloma and Possible Interactions with Concurrent Systemic Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092273. [PMID: 35565401 PMCID: PMC9099690 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose: Although chemotherapy, biological agents, and radiotherapy (RT) are cornerstones of the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), the literature regarding the possible interactions of concurrent systemic treatment (CST) and RT is limited, and the optimal RT dose is still unclear. Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent RT for MM at our institution from 1 January 2005 to 30 June 2020. The data of 312 patients and 577 lesions (treated in 411 accesses) were retrieved. Results: Most of the treated lesions involved the vertebrae (60%) or extremities (18.9%). Radiotherapy was completed in 96.6% of the accesses and, although biologically effective doses assuming an α/β ratio of 10 (BED 10) > 38 Gy and CST were significantly associated with higher rates of toxicity, the safety profile was excellent, with side effects grade ≥2 reported only for 4.1% of the accesses; CST and BED 10 had no impact on the toxicity at one and three months. Radiotherapy resulted in significant improvements in performance status and in a pain control rate of 87.4% at the end of treatment, which further increased to 96.9% at three months and remained at 94% at six months. The radiological response rate at six months (data available for 181 lesions) was 79%, with only 4.4% of lesions in progression. Progression was significantly more frequent in the lesions treated without CST or BED 10 < 15 Gy, while concurrent biological therapy resulted in significantly lower rates of progression. Conclusion: Radiotherapy resulted in optimal pain control rates and fair toxicity, regardless of BED 10 and CST; the treatments with higher BED 10 and CST (remarkably biological agents) improved the already excellent radiological disease control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Emanuele Guerini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Alessandra Tucci
- Department of Haematology, ASST-Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar Di Valpolicella, Italy;
| | - Eneida Mataj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Angelo Belotti
- Department of Haematology, ASST-Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.T.); (A.B.)
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0303995272
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Ludovica Pegurri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Marco Bonù
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Davide Tomasini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Jessica Imbrescia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Alessandra Donofrio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Giorgio Facheris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Navdeep Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Giulia Volpi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Cesare Tomasi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, Section of Public Health and Human Sciences, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Medical Physics Department, ASST Spedali Civili Hospital, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Michela Buglione
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy; (A.E.G.); (E.M.); (L.T.); (L.P.); (S.P.); (M.B.); (D.T.); (J.I.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (N.S.); (G.V.); (S.M.M.); (M.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
König L, Herfarth K. [Benefits of radiotherapy for patients with solitary plasmacytoma or multiple myeloma]. Radiologe 2021; 62:30-34. [PMID: 34762165 DOI: 10.1007/s00117-021-00935-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment options for patients with solitary plasmacytoma (SP) or multiple myeloma (MM) should be discussed in an interdisciplinary context. This systematic review focuses on the importance of radiotherapy in MM and SP. OBJECTIVE Summary of local radio-oncological treatment options for patients with SP and MM. MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on a systematic literature search, the current evidence on the topic was analyzed and summarized. RESULTS Patients with SP should be primarily treated with radiotherapy with or without surgery. Irradiation concepts may vary depending on risk factors and manifestation (solitary bone plasmacytoma vs. solitary extramedullary plasmacytoma). Although local control rates are high after radiotherapy, progression to multiple myeloma frequently occurs. In patients with MM, radiation is mainly used in palliative settings for pain relief, prevention of fractures or in patients who suffer from neurological symptoms due to spinal cord compression. Irradiation dose and fractionation should be selected based on treatment indication and general condition of the patient. CONCLUSION Although most patients receive systemic treatment at initial diagnosis, approximately 40% of patients with MM will require radiation during the course of their disease. While radiation is mainly used for palliation in patients with MM, it represents the primary and curative treatment option in patients with SP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laila König
- Abteilung RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Abteilung RadioOnkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nehlsen AD, Sindhu KK, Moshier E, Richter J, Richard S, Chari A, Sanchez L, Parekh S, Cho HJ, Jagannath S, Dharmarajan K. The Safety and Efficacy of Radiation Therapy with Concurrent Dexamethasone, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, and Cisplatin-Based Systemic Therapy for Multiple Myeloma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2021; 22:192-197. [PMID: 34736880 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The concurrent delivery of radiation therapy (RT) with salvage chemotherapies in the management of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM) is an area of ongoing investigation. This study examined the safety and efficacy of palliative RT given in the setting of concurrent dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin (DCEP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-five patients with MM received RT to 64 different sites within three weeks of receiving DCEP from 2010 to 2020. A median dose of 20 Gray (range 8-32.5 Gy) was delivered in a median of 5 fractions (range 1-15). Patients received a median of 1 cycle (range 1-5) of DCEP. Rates of hematologic and RT toxicity were recorded along with pain, radiographic, and laboratory responses to treatment. RESULTS RT was completed in 98% of patients. 21% of patients experienced RTOG grade 3+ hematologic toxicity before RT, which increased to 35% one-month post-RT (P = .13) before decreasing to 12% at 3 to 6 months (P = .02). The most common toxicity experienced was thrombocytopenia. Grade 1 to 2 non-hematologic RT-related toxicity was reported in 15% of patients while on treatment and fell to 6% one-month after completing RT. Pain resolved in 94% of patients with symptomatic lesions at baseline. Stable disease or better was observed in 34/39 (87%) of the targeted lesions on surveillance imaging. CONCLUSION RT administered concurrently with DCEP was well-tolerated by most of the patients in this series, with low rates of hematologic and RT-related toxicity. RT was also very effective, with the vast majority of patients demonstrating resolution of their pain and a significant response on follow-up imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony D Nehlsen
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Radiation Oncology, NY, NY, USA.
| | - Kunal K Sindhu
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Radiation Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| | - Erin Moshier
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Biostatistics, NY, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Richter
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Hematology and Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| | - Shambavi Richard
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Hematology and Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| | - Ajai Chari
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Hematology and Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| | - Larysa Sanchez
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Hematology and Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| | - Samir Parekh
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Hematology and Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| | - Hearn Jay Cho
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Hematology and Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| | - Sundar Jagannath
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Hematology and Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| | - Kavita Dharmarajan
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Radiation Oncology, NY, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Effective Pain Control With Very Low Dose Palliative Radiation Therapy for Patients With Multiple Myeloma With Uncomplicated Osseous Lesions. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100729. [PMID: 34258474 PMCID: PMC8256178 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2020] [Revised: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Osteolytic lesions are present in 75% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and frequently require palliation with radiation therapy (RT). Prior case series of patients with MM with bone pain undergoing palliative RT suggests doses ≥12 Gy (equivalent dose in 2Gy fractions, EQD2) provide excellent bone pain relief. However, recent advances in care and novel biologic agents have significantly improved overall survival and quality of life for patients with MM. We hypothesized that lower-dose RT (LDRT, EQD2 <12 Gy) offers an effective alternative to higher-dose RT (HDRT, EQD2 ≥12 Gy) for palliation of painful, uncomplicated MM bone lesions. METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with MM treated with RT for uncomplicated, painful bone lesions and stratified by EQD2 ≥/< 12 Gy. Clinical pain response (CPR) rates, acute and late toxicity, pain response duration, and retreatment rates between LDRT and HDRT groups were analyzed. RESULTS Thirty-five patients with 70 treated lesions were included: 24 patients (48 lesions) treated with HDRT and 11 patients (22 lesions) with LDRT. Median follow-up was 14 and 16.89 months for HDRT and LDRT, respectively. The median dose of HDRT treatment was 20 Gy versus 4 Gy in the LDRT group. The CPR rate was 98% for HDRT and 95% for LDRT. There was no significant difference in any-grade acute toxicity between the HDRT and LDRT cohorts (24.5% vs 9.1%, Χ2 P = .20). Pain recurred in 10% of lesions (12% HDRT vs 9.5% LDRT). Median duration of pain response did not significantly differ between cohorts (P = .91). Five lesions were retreated, 2 (9.5%) in the LDRT cohort, and 3 (6.3%) in the HDRT cohort. CONCLUSION In this study, LDRT effectively palliated painful, uncomplicated MM bony lesions with acceptable CPR and duration of palliation. These data support prospective comparisons of LDRT versus HDRT for palliation of painful, uncomplicated MM bony lesions.
Collapse
|
9
|
Ailawadhi S, Frank R, Ailawadhi M, Kanji Z, Jani P, Fiala M, Abdulazeez M, Ahmed S, Aggarwal CS, Aulakh S, Hodge D, Roy V, Alegria VR, Paulus A, Chanan-Khan A, Sher T. Utilization of radiation therapy in multiple myeloma: trends and changes in practice. Ann Hematol 2021; 100:735-741. [PMID: 33438047 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-020-04371-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Plasma cell disorders including plasmacytomas and multiple myeloma (MM) are exquisitely radiosensitive, and thus, radiation therapy (XRT) is used effectively in their management. The role of XRT in the setting of novel MM therapeutics has not been explored. The 2016 National Cancer Database (NCDB) for MM with patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 was studied. Association between utilization of XRT as part of initial therapy and patient, disease, or treating facility characteristics was studied. A total of 111,281 cases with 91.6% MM, 7% osseous plasmacytoma (PLA-O), and 1.4% extramedullary plasmacytoma (PLA-E) were identified. XRT was utilized as part of initial therapy in 25.4% cases, including 69.3% of PLA-O, 60% of PLA-E, and 21.5% of MM patients. Patients with PLA-E and MM were significantly less likely to receive XRT as compared to PLA-O (p < 0.001). A significantly decreased use of XRT was noted over time (p < 0.001), and for advancing patient age (p < 0.001), women (p < 0.001), and blacks (p < 0.001), and with increasing income (p = 0.015). Patients with Medicare were less likely to receive XRT (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78, 0.94) as compared to uninsured as were those with initial treatment at academic or high-volume facilities and facilities performing stem cell transplant. There was overall decreased utilization of XRT in recent years, possibly due to advent of efficacious systemic agents for MM therapy, with a higher XRT utilization for plasmacytomas. Patterns of XRT use need to be explored prospectively, so that uniform standards of healthcare delivery can be maintained and treatment heterogeneity can be minimized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sikander Ailawadhi
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. .,Division of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| | - Ryan Frank
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Meghna Ailawadhi
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Zahara Kanji
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Prachi Jani
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Mark Fiala
- Division of Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Mays Abdulazeez
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Salman Ahmed
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | | | - Sonikpreet Aulakh
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, West Virginia Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - David Hodge
- Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Vivek Roy
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Victoria R Alegria
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Aneel Paulus
- Division of Cancer Biology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Asher Chanan-Khan
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.,Hematology-Oncology, St. Vincent's Cancer Center, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Taimur Sher
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rasch S, Lund T, Asmussen JT, Lerberg Nielsen A, Faebo Larsen R, Østerheden Andersen M, Abildgaard N. Multiple Myeloma Associated Bone Disease. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2113. [PMID: 32751464 PMCID: PMC7465468 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12082113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The lytic bone disease is a hallmark of multiple myeloma, being present in about 80% of patients with newly diagnosed MM, and in more during the disease course. The myeloma associated bone disease (MBD) severely affects the morbidity and quality of life of the patients. MBD defines treatment demanding MM. In recent years, knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology has increased, and novel imaging technologies, medical and non-pharmaceutical treatments have improved. In this review, we highlight the major achievements in understanding, diagnosing and treating MBD. For diagnosing MBD, low-dose whole-body CT is now recommended over conventional skeletal survey, but also more advanced functional imaging modalities, such as diffusion-weighted MRI and PET/CT are increasingly important in the assessment and monitoring of MBD. Bisphosphonates have, for many years, played a key role in management of MBD, but denosumab is now an alternative to bisphosphonates, especially in patients with renal impairment. Radiotherapy is used for uncontrolled pain, for impeding fractures and in treatment of impeding or symptomatic spinal cord compression. Cement augmentation has been shown to reduce pain from vertebral compression fractures. Cautious exercise programs are safe and feasible and may have the potential to improve the status of patients with MM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Rasch
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Kloevervaenget 10, 12th Floor, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (S.R.); (T.L.); (R.F.L.)
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Haematology, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Finsensgade 35, DK-6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
| | - Thomas Lund
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Kloevervaenget 10, 12th Floor, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (S.R.); (T.L.); (R.F.L.)
- Haematology Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kloevervaenget 10, 12th Floor, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| | - Jon Thor Asmussen
- Department of Clinical Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
| | - Anne Lerberg Nielsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Sdr. Boulevard 29, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark;
| | - Rikke Faebo Larsen
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Kloevervaenget 10, 12th Floor, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (S.R.); (T.L.); (R.F.L.)
| | - Mikkel Østerheden Andersen
- Center for Spine Surgery & Research, Lillebaelt Hospital, Østre Hougvel 55, DK-5500 Middelfart, Denmark;
| | - Niels Abildgaard
- Department of Haematology, Odense University Hospital, Kloevervaenget 10, 12th Floor, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark; (S.R.); (T.L.); (R.F.L.)
- Haematology Research Unit, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Kloevervaenget 10, 12th Floor, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Resende Salgado L, Wang S, Adler A, Chang S, Ru M, Moshier E, Dharmarajan K, Jay Cho H, Bakst R. The Safety Profile of Concurrent Therapy for Multiple Myeloma in the Modern Era. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 4:112-117. [PMID: 30706018 PMCID: PMC6349658 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2018] [Revised: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The management of multiple myeloma has evolved in the modern era, partially owing to the increasing number of biologic therapeutics. Nonetheless, radiation remains an important treatment in the management of painful lytic lesions from multiple myeloma. The goal of this study is to evaluate the side effect profile of radiation therapy (RT) while patients are concurrently treated with biologic agents. Methods and Materials We conducted a retrospective study based on data collected from patients receiving RT at our institute from 2007 to 2017. A total of 130 patients (279 treatment sites) were included in this study with a median follow-up time of 14 months. Patients were required to be receiving a biological agent at least within 1 month before starting and up to 1 month after RT. Generalized estimating equations with a log link function and binomial distribution were used to estimate the prevalence ratio (PR) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) and compare the side effects between patients with RT alone and RT + biologic agent. Results The median age of all patients in our cohort was 64 years, with 53 men (58.9%) and 37 women (41.1%). The mean Karnofsky performance status score of all cohorts was 80. No significant difference in incidence of acute (PR: 1.33; 95% CI, 0.80-2.22; P = .2660) or subacute (PR: 0.90; 95% CI, 0.49-1.67; P = .7464) toxicities was found between patients with or without biologic agents who were treated concurrently with RT. No significant difference was found in reduction in laboratory values between patients with or without biologic agents treated concurrently with RT for white blood cells (P = .6916), platelets (P = .7779), or hematocrit (P = .0858). Conclusions Our study did not detect any significant toxicity rates from palliative radiation while patients were concurrently treated with biologic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Shutao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Ava Adler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Sanders Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Meng Ru
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Erin Moshier
- Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Kavita Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Hearn Jay Cho
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Richard Bakst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tsang RW, Campbell BA, Goda JS, Kelsey CR, Kirova YM, Parikh RR, Ng AK, Ricardi U, Suh CO, Mauch PM, Specht L, Yahalom J. Radiation Therapy for Solitary Plasmacytoma and Multiple Myeloma: Guidelines From the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:794-808. [PMID: 29976492 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop guidelines for the work-up and radiation therapy (RT) management of patients with plasma cell neoplasms. METHODS AND MATERIALS A literature review was conducted covering staging, work-up, and RT management of plasma cell neoplasms. Guidelines were developed through consensus by an international panel of radiation oncologists with expertise in these diseases, from the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group. RT volume definitions are based on the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. RESULTS Plasma cell neoplasms account for approximately one-fifth of mature B-cell neoplasms in the United States. The majority (∼95%) are diagnosed as multiple myeloma, in which there has been tremendous progress in systemic therapy approaches with novel drugs over the last 2 decades, resulting in improvements in disease control and survival. In contrast, a small proportion of patients with plasma cell neoplasms present with a localized plasmacytoma in the bone, or in extramedullary (extraosseous) soft tissues, and definitive RT is the standard treatment. RT provides long-term local control in the solitary bone plasmacytomas and is potentially curative in the extramedullary cases. This guideline reviews the diagnostic work-up, principles, and indications for RT, target volume definition, treatment planning, and follow-up procedures for solitary plasmacytoma. Specifically, detailed recommendations for RT volumes and dose/fractionation are provided, illustrated with specific case scenarios. The role of palliative RT in multiple myeloma is also discussed. CONCLUSIONS The International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group presents a standardized approach to the use and implementation of definitive RT in solitary plasmacytomas. The modern principles outlining the supportive role of palliative RT in multiple myeloma in an era of novel systemic therapies are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard W Tsang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Belinda A Campbell
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jayant S Goda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
| | - Chris R Kelsey
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Rahul R Parikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Andrea K Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Oncology, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Chang-Ok Suh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Peter M Mauch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joachim Yahalom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|