Alemtuzumab and CHOP Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Aggressive Histology Peripheral T Cell Lymphomas: A Multi-Center Phase I Study

Cytomegalovirus infection risk with alemtuzumab therapy in hematological malignancies: a retrospective cohort study in the non-transplant setting

Alemtuzumab is a potent lymphocyte-depleting immunotherapy used in solid organ transplan-tation (SOT), that is increasingly being applied in diverse lymphoproliferative disorders (LPDs). However, a significant toxicity limiting expanded usage is cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, for which standardized preventive strategies exist in SOT but not in LPDs due to a poor understanding of infection risk in this population, with early LPD studies largely limited to stem cell transplantation. Using one of the most diverse arrays of LPDs studied to date, our retrospective cohort study of non-transplant patients receiving alemtuzumab over a ten-year period at a large regional cancer center examines the incidence and clinical profile of infected patients. Among 24 patients, we identified a composite CMV infection rate of 42% with a symptomatic rate of 21%. We also noted significant variations in preventive strategies, which alongside a high infection rate presents an opportunity to improve outcomes through further work in standardization.

Advances in the pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies of angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is an aggressive subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphomas with its cell origin determined to be follicular helper T-cells. AITL is characterized by a prominent tumor microenvironment involving dysregulation of immune cells, signaling pathways, and extracellular matrix. Significant progress has been made in the molecular pathophysiology of AITL, including genetic mutations, immune metabolism, hematopoietic-derived microenvironment, and non-hematopoietic microenvironment cells. Early diagnosis, detection of severe complications, and timely effective treatment are crucial for managing AITL. Treatment typically involves various combination chemotherapies, but the prognosis is often poor, and relapsed and refractory AITL remains challenging, necessitating improved treatment strategies. Therefore, this article provides an overview of the pathogenesis and latest advances in the treatment of AITL, with a focus on potential therapeutic targets, novel treatment strategies, and emerging immunotherapeutic approaches.

Recommendations on prevention of infections in patients with T-cell lymphomas: a narrative review and synthesis

T/Natural killer (NK) cell lymphomas (TCL) represent a heterogenous subgroup of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, associated with poorer prognosis and higher treatment toxicity. A cohesive synthesis of infection outcomes among TCL patients is lacking. International guidelines offer no specific recommendations regarding prophylaxis or supportive infection care for TCL patients. This systematic narrative review highlights infection outcomes in TCL patients treated with conventional, and novel therapies. Recommendations for infection screening, antimicrobial prophylaxis and vaccination strategies are outined.

A Case of Angioimmunoblastic T-Cell Lymphoma and the Difficulties of Diagnosis

Angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) is a rare and aggressive form of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). It can present with signs and symptoms that have broad differentials, including fevers, night sweats, and skin rashes. In this case report, we present an interesting case of a young male of Nigerian descent with recently treated malaria who presented with such symptoms and a picture that was complicated, due to an inconclusive excisional biopsy for lymphoma. He was later diagnosed with AITL. Given the patient's recent exposure to malaria, we will discuss the potential role malaria has in the development of AITL.

Novel T Follicular Helper-like T-Cell Lymphoma Therapies: From Preclinical Evaluation to Clinical Reality

Simple Summary

This work reviews the multiple efforts that have been and are being invested by researchers as well as clinicians to improve the treatment of a specific T-cell lymphoma called follicular helper peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Still, though treatments for B-cell lymphomas have improved, this particular T-cell lymphoma has little to no new therapeutic options that show marked improvements in the survival of the patients compared to treatment with chemotherapy. We report here the evaluation of targeted new therapies for this T-cell lymphoma in new preclinical models for this cancer or in clinical trials with the objective to offer better (combination) treatment options.

Abstract

The classification of peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) is constantly changing and contains multiple subtypes. Here, we focus on Tfh-like PTCL, to which angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL) belongs, according to the last WHO classification. The first-line treatment of these malignancies still relies on chemotherapy but gives very unsatisfying results for these patients. Enormous progress in the last decade in terms of understanding the implicated genetic mutations leading to signaling and epigenetic pathway deregulation in Tfh PTCL allowed the research community to propose new therapeutic approaches. These findings point towards new biomarkers and new therapies, including hypomethylating agents, such as azacytidine, and inhibitors of the TCR-hyperactivating molecules in Tfh PTCL. Additionally, metabolic interference, inhibitors of the NF-κB and PI3K-mTOR pathways and possibly novel immunotherapies, such as antibodies and chimeric antigen receptors (CAR) directed against Tfh malignant T-cell surface markers, are discussed in this review among other new treatment options.

Recent Advances in Diagnosis and Therapy of Angioimmunoblastic T Cell Lymphoma

Angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma (AITL) is a common subtype of mature peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL). As per the 2016 World Health Organization classification, AITL is now considered as a subtype of nodal T cell lymphoma with follicular helper T cells. The diagnosis is challenging and requires a constellation of clinical, laboratory and histopathological findings. Significant progress in the molecular pathophysiology of AITL has been achieved in the past two decades. Characteristic genomic features have been recognized that could provide a potential platform for better diagnosis and future prognostic models. Frontline therapy for AITL was mainly depending on chemotherapy and the management of relapsed or refractory AITL is still unsatisfactory with a very poor prognosis. Upfront transplantation offers better survival. Novel agents have been introduced recently with promising outcomes. Several clinical trials of combinations using novel agents are underway. Herein, we briefly review recent advances in AITL diagnosis and the evolving treatment landscape.

Neurotoxicity of antibodies in cancer therapy: A review

The objective of this manuscript is to identify the neurological side effect profile associated with different classes of antibodies used in cancer pharmacotherapy and to estimate the frequency in which these neurotoxicity occurs. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using OVID MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for articles written between January of 2010 till August of 2018. The spectrum of neurotoxicity was searched using expanded terminology, medical subject headings, truncation, spelling variations and database specific controlled vocabulary. 2134 citations were retrieved that were narrowed down to 151 when SORT 1 or SORT 2 critical appraisal tool was applied to articles with human subjects. Meta-analysis using random effect model was done to estimate the prevalence of neurological symptoms per class of antibody described in SORT1 and SORT2 articles. It was found that the most common neurotoxicity per antibody class are as follows; Bi-specific T-cell engagers was headache 38% [35-40%; I² 0%]; anti-CD20, neuropathy, 16% [7-24%, I² 65%]; anti-CD30, neuropathy 57% [46-68%, I² 72%]; anti-CD52, neuropathy 5-15%; anti-CTL4, headache 12% [7-16%, I² 49%]; anti-EGFR, headache 25% [11-38%, I² 92%]; anti-Her2, neuropathy 33% [18-49%, I² 98%]; anti-PD1 and PDL1, headache 3% [2-5%, I² 85%]; and anti-VEGF, headache 25% [16-35%, I² 73%]. Therefore, all classes of antibodies used in cancer pharmacotherapy have associated neurotoxicity with a wide spectrum of effects afflicting the nervous system as a whole. The specific side effects and the frequency at which they occur differ per class of antibody. Broader and more severe symptoms were noted to effect patients with preexisting brain lesions.

New lessons learned in T-PLL: results from a prospective phase-II trial with fludarabine-mitoxantrone-cyclophosphamide-alemtuzumab induction followed by alemtuzumab maintenance

Clinical trials in T-cell prolymphocytic leukemia (T-PLL) are scarce. Based on a precursor study testing fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and cyclophosphamide followed by alemtuzumab (FMC-A), we aimed to improve this regimen by upfront combining subcutaneous (s.c.) alemtuzumab with FMC for four cycles followed by an alemtuzumab-maintenance (FMCA + A). This prospective multicenter phase-II trial assessed response, survival, and toxicity of that regimen administered to pretreated (n = 4) and treatment-naïve (n = 12) T-PLL patients. The best overall response rate after FMCA was 68.8% (n = 11) including five CRs (31.3%) and six PRs (37.5%). Six patients entered the alemtuzumab-maintenance. Median overall and progression-free survival was 16.7 and 11.2 months, respectively. Hematologic toxicities were the most frequent grade 3/4 side effects. A reduced incidence of CMV-reactivations was attributed to the prophylactic administration of valganciclovir. Overall, FMCA + A did not improve the efficacy of the FMC-A-regimen or of single i.v. alemtuzumab. It suggests that a chemotherapy backbone prevents efficient alemtuzumab dosing and confirms that intravenous alemtuzumab is to be preferred over its s.c. route in T-PLL. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01186640.

The discovery and development of romidepsin for the treatment of T-cell lymphoma

INTRODUCTION

Romidepsin is a potent and selective inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDCAi). It is also the only bicyclic inhibitor to undergo clinical assessment and is considered a promising drug for the treatment of T-cell lymphomas. The cellular action of romidepsin results in enhanced histone acetylation, as well as the acetylation of other nuclear or cytoplasmic proteins, influencing cell cycle, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. In phase II studies involving patients with relapsed or refractory of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL), romidepsin produced overall response rates (ORR) of 34-35% and 25-38%, with complete response (CR) rates of 6% and 15-18%, respectively. Areas covered: This review summarizes the development of romidepsin, the mechanisms behind its antineoplastic action and its pharmacology. It also covers its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, as well as the preclinical and clinical data on its activity in T-cell lymphoma. Expert opinion: Since there are only few effective therapies available for T-cell lymphomas, romidepsin is a valuable option for relapsed/refractory patients with both CTCL and PTCL. It's also generally well tolerated, and gives potentially durable responses for patients with advanced and symptomatic disease. Combinations of romidepsin with other antineoplastic agents may also further improve drug response and outcomes in T-cell lymphoma.

The role of novel immunotherapies in non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Immunotherapy is an evolving modality in the treatment of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Vaccinations with patient-specific tumor-derived antigens have been developed to strengthen immune response to tumor. The success of rituximab, a monoclonal antibody for CD20 on malignant B-cells, fueled further immunotherapy research. The power of the immune system to fight hematologic malignancies is seen in allogeneic stem cell transplant, where donor T cells attack residual malignant cells in the recipient. Now, three innovative therapeutic immunotherapy classes (I) adoptive cellular therapy; (II) immune-checkpoint inhibitors; and (III) novel antibody therapies show promising results in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Genetically engineered T cells, CAR T cells, obtained remissions in lymphomas refractory to conventional chemotherapy. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors, such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab revolutionized the treatment of many solid tumors, and unprecedented results are now reported in relapsed/refractory lymphoma. Building on the success of rituximab, additional therapeutic monoclonal antibodies were developed for lymphoma treatment. Antibodies have recently been further engineered with multiple binding sites to directly engage both tumor and T cells. There are exciting early clinical trial results for the first bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE), blinatumomab, as well as promising ongoing studies for dual antibody molecules, Dual-Affinity Re-Targeting (DART) proteins. This review highlights these three immunotherapy classes for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas and discusses the mechanism of action, clinical efficacy, and toxicities of each.

A phase II study on the role of gemcitabine plus romidepsin (GEMRO regimen) in the treatment of relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma patients

Background

There is no consensus regarding optimal treatment for peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL), especially in relapsed or refractory cases, which have very poor prognosis and a dismal outcome, with 5-year overall survival of 30 %.

Methods

A multicenter prospective phase II trial was conducted to investigate the role of the combination of gemcitabine plus romidepsin (GEMRO regimen) in relapsed/refractory PTCL, looking for a potential synergistic effect of the two drugs. GEMRO regimen contemplates an induction with romidepsin plus gemcitabine for six 28-day cycles followed by maintenance with romidepsin for patients in at least partial remission. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were survival, duration of response, and safety of the regimen.

Results

The ORR was 30 % (6/20) with 15 % (3) complete response (CR) rate. Two-year overall survival was 50 % and progression-free survival 11.2 %. Grade ≥3 adverse events were represented by thrombocytopenia (60 %), neutropenia (50 %), and anemia (20 %). Two patients are still in CR with median response duration of 18 months. The majority of non-hematological toxicities were mild and transient. No treatment-related death occurred and no toxicity led to treatment interruption.

Conclusions

GEMRO combination regimen shows efficacy data similar to those of single-agent romidepsin with additional hematologic toxicities. Synergy observed in preclinical phase did not turn into ability to improve clinical outcomes.

Trial registration

The trial was registered under EudraCT 2012-001404-38; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01822886.