A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Haploidentical Transplantation and Other Graft Sources in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Donor matters: Donor selection impact on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation outcomes in Hispanic patients with B-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia: Insights from a myeloablative HSCT study

BACKGROUND

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a pivotal treatment for high-risk acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), although limited by suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donors (MSD). This study evaluates the impact of donor selection on outcomes in post-HSCT Hispanic B-cell ALL patients.

METHODOLOGY

This single-center retrospective study evaluates outcomes in 88 adult Hispanic B-cell ALL patients who underwent haploidentical, MSD, or MUD myeloablative HSCT between 2013 and 2023.

RESULTS

Compared to Haploidentical transplants, MSD exhibited worse cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) (HR = 3.39; P = 0.014) and disease-free survival (DFS) (HR = 2.44; P = 0.048) whereas MUD outcomes did not differ. This effect persisted even when controlling for pre-HSCT stage and Minimal residual disease (MRD) status. In addition, Ph-like was a significant predictor of worse DFS (HR = 3.60; P=0.014) and CIR (HR = 2.97; P=0.035) on multivariate analysis. Older donor age correlated with worse GVHD-free, relapse-free survival (GRFS) in haploidentical transplants (HR = 1.05; P=0.036).

CONCLUSION

Our data highlights improved outcomes with younger, haploidentical donors among Hispanic B-cell ALL patients undergoing myeloablative HSCT. This underscores the importance of donor selection in optimizing outcomes for ALL patients.

Stem cell transplantation for ALL: you've always got a donor, why not always use it?

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) represents a consolidated therapeutic strategy for high-risk pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), offering the potential for curative treatment. This manuscript delves into the debate around the more universal application of HSCT for pediatric ALL in the modern era, considering the ubiquitous availability of suitable donors. In fact, despite significant advancements in chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy, a subset of pediatric patients with ALL with high-risk features or relapse continue to encounter poor prognostic outcomes. For this subgroup of patients, HSCT often remains the only potentially curative measure, leveraging the graft-versus- leukemia effect for long-term disease control. Nevertheless, the procedure's complexity and associated risks have traditionally curtailed its widespread use. However, the scenario is shifting with improvements in HLA matching, availability of alternative donor sources, less toxic conditioning regimens, and improved supportive care protocols. Concurrently, emerging therapies like CD19+ CAR T cells present new considerations for definitive therapy selection in relapsed/ refractory ALL. This article reviews critical current evidence and debates the potential of HSCT as a more universal treatment for ALL, reevaluating traditional treatment stratification in light of the constant availability of stem cell donors.

A Review of Acute Lymphocytic Leukemia (ALL) in the Pediatric Population: Evaluating Current Trends and Changes in Guidelines in the Past Decade

Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) is a commonly diagnosed cancer in children. Despite technological advancements to improve treatment and survival rates, there has been a steady increase in the incidence of ALL and treatment failures. This paper discusses the pathogenic interaction between genetic and environmental factors leading to childhood ALL. It evaluates the current treatment guidelines and notable obstacles leading to resistance, relapse, and treatment toxicities. The review evaluates a 10-year trend in the management guidelines of pediatric ALL through a systematic literature review of records from 2012 to 2023. Findings show that improvement in the five-year survival rates, notwithstanding rates of relapse and incurable diseases, is still high. Furthermore, several risk factors, including an interplay between genetic and environmental factors, are largely contributory to the outcome of ALL treatments and its overall incidence. Moreover, huge financial costs have remained a significant challenge in outcomes. There remains a need to provide individualized treatment plans, shared decision-making, and goals of care as parts of the management guidelines for the best possible outcomes. We expect that future advancements will increase overall survival rates and disease-free years.

In 2022, which is preferred: haploidentical or cord transplant?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the treatment of choice for high-risk hematological malignancies such as acute myeloid and lymphocytic leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, and myeloproliferative disorders. Alternative donor transplantation from either haploidentical (haplo-SCT) or cord blood donor (CBT) is an established therapeutic alternative for patients who need transplants but lack a human leukocyte antigen-matched donor. Although haplo-SCT (mainly non-T-cell-depleted haplo-SCT with posttransplant cyclophosphamide) is increasing while CBT is decreasing worldwide (Figure 1), recent developments in CBT, especially cord blood expansion and other strategies to improve engraftment and immune reconstitution post-CBT, make CBT still a valuable option. This article discusses the 2 options based on the currently available data, focusing on adults, and tries to give some clues to help the transplant physician choose a haploidentical vs a cord blood donor. Given the limited numbers of published or ongoing well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing haplo-SCT to CBT and the overall similar clinical results in the available, mostly registry-based, and single-center studies, with substantial heterogeneity and variability, the decision to perform haplo-SCT or CBT in a given patient depends not only on the patient, disease, and donor characteristics and donor availability (although most if not all patients should have in principle an alternative donor) but also on the transplant physician's discretion and, most importantly, the center's experience and preference and ongoing protocols and strategies.