1
|
Zhang L, Jin S, Wang Y, Zhang Z, Jia H, Li D, Lu Q. Predict nutrition-related adverse outcomes in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy: A systematic review. Radiother Oncol 2024; 197:110339. [PMID: 38795812 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute nutrition-related adverse outcomes are common in head and neck cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. Predictive models can assist in identifying high-risk patients to enable targeted intervention. We aimed to systematically evaluate predictive models for predicting severe acute nutritional symptoms, insufficient intake, tube feeding, sarcopenia, and weight loss. METHODS We searched PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Embase, WanFang, CNKI, and SinoMed. We selected studies developing predictive models for the aforementioned outcomes. Data were extracted using a predefined checklist. Risk of bias and applicability assessment were assessed using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted to summarize the model characteristics, risk of bias, and performance. RESULTS A total of 2941 studies were retrieved and 19 were included. Study outcome measure were different symptoms (n = 11), weight loss (n = 5), tube feeding (n = 3), and symptom or tube feeding (n = 1). Predictive factors mainly encompassed sociodemographic data, disease-related data, and treatment-related data. Seventeen studies reported area under the curve or C-index values ranging from 0.610 to 0.96, indicating moderate to good predictive performance. However, candidate predictors were incomplete, outcome measures were diverse, and the risk of bias was high. Most of them used traditional model development methods, and only two used machine learning. CONCLUSIONS Most current models showed moderate to good predictive performance. However, predictors are incomplete, outcome are inconsistent, and the risk of bias is high. Clinicians could carefully select the models with better model performance from the available models according to their actual conditions. Future research should include comprehensive and modifiable indicators and prioritize well-designed and reported studies for model development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lichuan Zhang
- Division of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Shuai Jin
- Department of Adult Care, School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100069, China
| | - Yujie Wang
- Department of Nursing, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Henan University People's Hospital, Henan Provincial Key Medicine Laboratory of Nursing, Zhengzhou, 450003, China
| | - Zijuan Zhang
- Division of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Huilin Jia
- School of Nursing, Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, China
| | - Decheng Li
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Qian Lu
- Division of Medical & Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costantino A, Sampieri C, Pace GM, Festa BM, Cerri L, Giordano GG, Dalè M, Spriano G, Peretti G, De Virgilio A. Development of machine learning models for the prediction of long-term feeding tube dependence after oral and oropharyngeal cancer surgery. Oral Oncol 2024; 148:106643. [PMID: 38006688 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2023.106643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To predict the necessity of enteral nutrition at 28 days after surgery in patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic procedures for oral and oropharyngeal cancers. MATERIAL AND METHODS Data from 193 patients with oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were retrospectively collected at two tertiary referral centers to train (n = 135) and validate (n = 58) six supervised machine learning (ML) models for binary prediction employing 29 clinical variables available pre-operatively. RESULTS The accuracy of the six ML models ranged between 0.74 and 0.88, while the measured area under the curve (AUC) between 0.75 and 0.87. The ML algorithms showed high specificity (range 0.87-0.96) and moderate sensitivity (range: 0.31-0.77) in detecting patients with ≥28 days feeding tube dependence. Negative predictive value was higher (range: 0.81-0.93) compared to positive predictive value (range: 0.40-0.71). Finally, the F1 score ranged between 0.35 and 0.74. CONCLUSIONS Classification performance of the ML algorithms showed optimistic accuracy in the prediction of enteral nutrition at 28 days after surgery. Prospective studies are mandatory to define the clinical benefit of a ML-based pre-operative prediction of a personalized nutrition protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Costantino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy; Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Claudio Sampieri
- Department of Medical Science (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy; Functional Unit of Head and Neck Tumors, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; Otorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Gian Marco Pace
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy; Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Bianca Maria Festa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy; Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Luca Cerri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
| | - Giorgio Gregory Giordano
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michael Dalè
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spriano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy; Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Giorgio Peretti
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy; Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Armando De Virgilio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Rita Levi Montalcini, 4, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy; Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sampieri C, Costantino A, Giordano GG, Dalè M, Marchi F, Iandelli A, Filauro M, Parrinello G, Pace GM, Festa BM, Spriano G, De Virgilio A, Peretti G. Predicting the need for prophylactic gastrostomy in major head and neck cancer surgery: The PEG score. Head Neck 2023; 45:3042-3052. [PMID: 37789705 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To elaborate a preoperative score to predict the necessity of enteral nutrition at 28 days postoperatively in patients undergoing head and neck surgery. METHODS A total of 424 patients with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, laryngeal, and hypopharyngeal carcinoma were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed to identify preoperative predictors of prolonged postsurgical enteral feeding which were used to create a prediction model with an easy-to-use nomogram. RESULTS Five preoperative variables (body mass index, previous radiotherapy, preoperative dysphagia, type of surgery, flap reconstruction) were found to be independent predictive factors and were used to create a prediction model named PEG score together with the related nomogram. Accuracy, F1, and the area under the curve (AUC) were 0.74, 0.83, and 0.74. Different decision thresholds can be used to vary the sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSIONS The PEG score showed high prediction performances for modeling the need for enteral nutrition at 28 days postoperatively. Prospective studies are needed to define a personalized nutrition protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio Sampieri
- Department of Medical Science (DIMES), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
- Functional Unit of Head and Neck Tumors, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Costantino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Giorgio Gregory Giordano
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Michael Dalè
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Filippo Marchi
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Iandelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marta Filauro
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giampiero Parrinello
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Gian Marco Pace
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Bianca Maria Festa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spriano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Armando De Virgilio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano (MI), Italy
| | - Giorgio Peretti
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics (DISC), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chloupek A, Jurkiewicz D, Zarzycki K, Nowocień J, Grab P. The Effect of Nasogastric Feeding after Surgery in Patients with Head and Neck Cancers - Retrospective Single Center Experience. Nutr Cancer 2023; 75:1803-1810. [PMID: 37539461 DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2023.2242105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to assess clinical factors that could predict the need for nasogastric feeding after surgery in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and evaluate the effect of tube feeding on selected laboratory parameters.This single-center retrospective study included 153 patients who underwent surgery for HNC. Data on patient and tumor characteristics were collected, along with laboratory measurements. Logistic regression was used to identify the predictors of the need for nasogastric feeding. Laboratory parameters were compared between patients who required nasogastric feeding vs those who did not.Nasogastric feeding was required in 90 patients (59%). Significant predictors of nasogastric feeding in HNC patients after surgery, which were revealed by univariate regression analysis, included low body mass index (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84), squamous cell carcinoma histology (OR = 8.05), T2 tumor stage (OR = 2.27), red blood cell count (M/µL) (OR = 0.44), hemoglobin levels (g/dL) (OR = 0.80), and mean corpuscular volume (fL) (OR = 1.10). Multivariate analysis showed that low BMI (OR = 0.87) and red blood cell count (M/µL) (OR = 0.32) were prognostic factors for nasogastric feeding. A significant percentage increase in white blood cell count from admission to discharge was noted in patients who required nasogastric feeding vs those who did not (p = 0.003).Determining factors that predict the need for nasogastric feeding in HNC patients after surgery may support more personalized treatment planning to optimize clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldona Chloupek
- Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Dariusz Jurkiewicz
- Department of Otolaryngology and Oncology, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Zarzycki
- Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Nowocień
- Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Grab
- Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fahy E, Brooker RC, Fleming JC, Patterson JM. A review of unplanned admissions in head and neck cancer patients undergoing oncological treatment. Support Care Cancer 2023; 31:328. [PMID: 37154829 PMCID: PMC10165288 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-07770-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
AIM Non-surgical treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC) often results in severe toxicities, which are detrimental to a patient's health and quality of life. There is limited published UK data on unplanned hospital admissions and reasons associated with admission. We aim to identify frequencies and reasons for unplanned hospital admissions, highlighting those patient groups who are most vulnerable. METHODS A retrospective study of unplanned hospital admissions of HNC patients receiving non-surgical treatment was completed. An inpatient admission was defined as ≥ 1 night spent in the hospital. To test potential demographic and treatment predictors of inpatient admission, a multiple regression model was constructed using the endpoint measure (unplanned admission), as the dependent variable. RESULTS A cohort of 216 patients was identified over a 7-month period, and 38 of these patients (17%) required an unplanned admission. Treatment type was the only statistically significant predictor of in-patient admission. The majority of admissions were patients receiving chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (58%) with predominant reasons for admission being nausea and vomiting (25.5%) and decreased oral intake/dehydration (30%). Of the patients admitted, 12 had a prophylactic PEG placed pre-treatment, and 18 of 26 admitted without prophylactic PEG required nasogastric tube feeding during their admission. DISCUSSION Almost one-fifth of HNC patients over this time period required hospital admission; the majority of which can be attributed to treatment toxicities when receiving CRT. This is concurrent with other studies which review the impact of radiotherapy versus CRT. Increased support and monitoring, particularly focused on nutrition, are required for patients with HNC who receive CRT. KEY MESSAGE This article describes a retrospective review of a patient undergoing non-surgical treatment for head and neck cancer. These patients frequently require unplanned hospital admission. The results indicate that patients undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy are most vulnerable to deterioration and additional support focused on nutrition for these patients is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emer Fahy
- Speech and Language Therapy, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trusts, 65 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L7 8YA, UK.
| | - Rachel C Brooker
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trusts, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jason C Fleming
- Liverpool Head & Neck Centre, Head and Neck Surgery, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Aintree Hospital, Liverpool, L9 7AL, UK
| | - Joanne M Patterson
- School of Health Sciences, Institute of Population Health/Liverpool Head and Neck Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Role of endoscopy on enteral feeding. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2022; 38:461-466. [PMID: 35881958 DOI: 10.1097/mog.0000000000000872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
|
7
|
Folwarski M, Klek S, Brzeziński M, Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz A, Wyszomirski A, Meyer-Szary J, Skonieczna-Żydecka K. Prevalence and Trends in Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement: Results From a 10-Year, Nationwide Analysis. Front Nutr 2022; 9:906409. [PMID: 35707793 PMCID: PMC9189377 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.906409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the most commonly used access for long-term enteral nutrition. Only a few studies report the prevalence and epidemiology of PEG placements. No previous data concentrated on the healthcare system issues influencing the qualification rates and professional nutritional support for individuals with PEG. Methods We conducted a retrospective nationwide analysis of PEG placements in Poland from 2010 to 2020. The central data on ICD-10 coding of adult patients with PEG reported to the insurance company were used for the analysis of general and regional prevalence, age, and primary and secondary diseases. Rates of patients with home enteral nutrition (HEN) were calculated with a special focus on patients with cancer. A secondary aim was to determine the causes of regional disparities among administrative regions. Results A total number of 90,182 PEGs were placed during the observation period. The number was increasing each year with statistical significance. Malnutrition, dysphagia, and cardiorespiratory/metabolic diseases were the most frequently reported primary diseases. A total of 11.98% of all patients were diagnosed with cancer; 49.9% of oncological patients suffered from head and neck cancer (HNC) and 19.9% from esophageal cancer. In total, 6.61% of HNC and 27.46% of patients with esophageal cancer from the Polish National Cancer Registry (NCR) had PEG. The rates of patients in more advanced ages (65–74 and over 85 years) were growing and decreased in younger groups (18–24, 45–54, and 55–64 years). Overall, 27.6% of all (11.86% of cancer) patients with PEG were reimbursed HEN. A high number of patients in nursing care facilities, lower education of citizens, and lower number of hospital beds were associated with more PEG insertions in the administrative regions. Conclusion The number of PEG placements has been increasing, particularly in the elderly. Systemic solutions must be found to address the problems of regional disparities in PEG’s prevalence as well as the lack of inclusion criteria for nutritional support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Folwarski
- Department of Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
- General Surgery Department, Home Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition Unit, Nicolaus Copernicus Hospital, Gdańsk, Poland
- *Correspondence: Marcin Folwarski,
| | - Stanislaw Klek
- Surgical Oncology Clinic, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Cancer Institute, Kraków, Poland
| | - Michał Brzeziński
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, Allergology, and Nutrition, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | | - Adam Wyszomirski
- Department of Adult Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Jarosław Meyer-Szary
- Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Congenital Heart Defects, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Predicting the need for aggressive nutritional supplementation in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:129-138. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
9
|
Tooth extractions prior to chemoradiation or bioradiation are associated with weight loss during treatment for locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Support Care Cancer 2022; 30:5329-5338. [PMID: 35278135 PMCID: PMC9046292 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-06942-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prior to radiotherapy combined with chemotherapy (CRT) or biotherapy (BRT) for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), teeth with poor prognosis that pose a risk for post-RT osteoradionecrosis (ORN) are removed. The effect of tooth loss on body weight loss and tube feeding (TF) dependency during CRT/BRT is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of incomplete dentition, tooth extractions prior to CRT/BRT, and the subsequent loss of functional units on (1) weight loss during CRT/BRT and (2) the need for TF during CRT/BRT for OPSCC. METHODS OPSCC patients treated with CRT/BRT between 2013 and 2016 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Dental status was determined during the dental assessment at first visit and after tooth extractions prior to the start of CRT/BRT. Weight loss during CRT/BRT was scored dichotomously, comparing weight loss > 5% to stable or increased weight. Potential factors associated with weight loss were identified, including patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics. RESULTS Seventy-seven OPSCC patients were included. Forty patients (52%) experienced weight loss > 5% during CRT/BRT. Extractions were performed in 66% of the OPSCC patients. The mean number of extracted teeth was 4.1 ± 5.6 per patient. Tooth extractions prior to CRT/BRT were associated with weight loss > 5% during CRT/BRT (HR 1.130 (95% CI 1.011-1.262), p = 0.031). None of the dental status-related parameters showed any significant associative value for TF during CRT/BRT. CONCLUSIONS Pre-CRT/BRT tooth extractions intended to reduce the risk of ORN, are a risk factor for weight loss during CRT/BRT for OPSCC. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER This study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the MUMC + (METC 2020-1589) on July 28, 2020.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kok A, van der Lugt C, Leermakers-Vermeer MJ, de Roos NM, Speksnijder CM, de Bree R. Nutritional interventions in patients with head and neck cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy: Current practice at the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology centres. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 31:e13518. [PMID: 34637563 PMCID: PMC9285387 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Objective To assess variations in nutritional interventions during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) among the Dutch Head and Neck Oncology centres (HNOCs). Methods An online questionnaire about nutritional interventions and dietetic practices was sent to 14 oncology dietitians of the HNOCs. Results The response rate was 93%. The number of scheduled dietetic consultations varied from two to seven during CRT. Most centres (77%) reported using a gastrostomy for tube feeding in the majority of patients. Gastrostomies were placed prophylactically upon indication (39%) or in all patients (15%), reactive (15%), or both (31%). For calculating energy requirements, 54% of the dietitians used the Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization and United Nations University (FAO/WHO/UNU) formula and 77% uses 1.2–1.5 g/kg body weight for calculating protein requirements. Almost half of the centres (46%) reported to remove the gastrostomy between 8 and 12 weeks after CR. Most centres (92%) reported to end dietary treatment within 6 months after CRT. Conclusion This study shows substantial variation in dietetic practice, especially in the use of a gastrostomy for tube feeding, between the HNOCs. There is a need for concise dietetic guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annemieke Kok
- Department of Dietetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn van der Lugt
- Department of Dietetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marja J Leermakers-Vermeer
- Department of Dietetics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole M de Roos
- Division of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Caroline M Speksnijder
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Special Dental Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Emmons D. Reducing outpatient gastrostomy tube complications. Nutr Clin Pract 2021; 37:351-360. [PMID: 34101264 DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To monitor the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary education protocol for gastrostomy tube (GT) use and care for patients to reduce complications postplacement. METHODS Baseline assessment included a preintervention/intervention design through quantitative measures to determine reduction in the number of GT complications postprocedure following implementation of a patient education protocol for 16 patients in the study. INTERVENTION A multidisciplinary approach was used in protocol development for standardizing patient education. Verbal, written, and hands-on demonstration methods for GT care were used to provide multiple education pathways to increase patient knowledge. Over the progression of 8 months (July 2019 to March 2020), patients with a new GT were followed postprocedure (1-2 weeks prior to starting radiation treatments) and throughout their course of radiation treatments (typically 6-7 weeks). RESULTS All 16 patients (100%) in the intervention group were included in the final analysis. GT complications were reduced from 91% in the preintervention group (n = 11) to 37% in the intervention group (n = 16). The most significant reduction occurred in technique issues, which decreased from 36% (n = 4) to 0%. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a multidisciplinary approach with multiple educational sessions prior to GT placement and use led to increased patient knowledge and reduced GT complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deanna Emmons
- Department of Clinical Nutrition, Elkhart General Hospital, Beacon Health System, Elkhart, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gaito S, France A, Foden P, Abravan A, Burnet N, Garcez K, Kota VR, Lee LW, Price J, Sykes A, Thomson D, Smith E, Osorio EV, McPartlin A. A Predictive Model for Reactive Tube Feeding in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive (Chemo) Radiotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:e433-e441. [PMID: 34090753 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Careful management of a patient's nutritional status during and after treatment for head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC) is crucial for optimal outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop a model for stratifying a patient's risk of requiring reactive enteral feeding through a nasogastric tube during radiotherapy for HNSCC, based on clinical and treatment-related factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cohort of consecutive patients treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for HNSCC between January 2016 and January 2018 was identified in the institutional electronic database for retrospective analysis. Patients requiring enteral feeding pretreatment were excluded. Clinical and treatment data were obtained from prospectively recorded electronic clinical notes and planning software. RESULTS Baseline patient characteristics and tumour-related parameters were captured for 225 patients. Based on the results of the univariate analysis and using a stepwise backwards selection process, clinical and dosimetric variables were selected to optimise a clinically predictive multivariate model, fitted using logistic regression. The parameters found to affect the probability, P, of requiring a nasogastric feeding tube for >4 weeks in our clinical multivariate model were: tumour site, tumour stage (early T0/1/2 stage versus advanced T3/T4 stage), chemotherapy drug (none versus any drug) and mean dose to the contralateral parotid gland. A scoring model using the regression coefficients of the selected variables in the clinical multivariate model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.745 (95% confidence interval 0.678-0.812), indicating good discriminative performance. Internal validation of the model involved splitting the dataset 80:20 into training and test datasets 10 times and assessing differences in AUC of the model fitted to these. CONCLUSIONS We developed an easy-to-use prediction model based on both clinical and dosimetric parameters, which, once externally validated, can lead to more personalised treatment planning and inform clinical decision-making on the appropriateness of prophylactic versus reactive enteral feeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gaito
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK.
| | - A France
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, Manchester, UK
| | - P Foden
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, Manchester, UK
| | - A Abravan
- The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, Manchester, UK
| | - N Burnet
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - K Garcez
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - V R Kota
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - L W Lee
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - J Price
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - A Sykes
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - D Thomson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - E Smith
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| | - E V Osorio
- The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, Manchester, UK
| | - A McPartlin
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Clinical Oncology, Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nuyts S, Bollen H, Eisbruch A, Corry J, Strojan P, Mäkitie AA, Langendijk JA, Mendenhall WM, Smee R, DeBree R, Lee AWM, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. Unilateral versus bilateral nodal irradiation: Current evidence in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2021; 43:2807-2821. [PMID: 33871090 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancers of the head and neck region often present with nodal involvement. There is a long-standing convention within the community of head and neck radiation oncology to irradiate both sides of the neck electively in almost all cases to include both macroscopic and microscopic disease extension (so called elective nodal volume). International guidelines for the selection and delineation of the elective lymph nodes were published in the early 2000s and were updated recently. However, diagnostic imaging techniques have improved the accuracy and reliability of nodal staging and as a result, small metastases that used to remain undetected and were thus in the past included in the elective nodal volume, will now be included in high-dose volumes. Furthermore, the elective nodal areas are situated close to the parotid glands, the submandibular glands and the swallowing muscles. Therefore, irradiation of a smaller, more selected volume of the elective nodes could reduce treatment-related toxicity. Several researchers consider the current bilateral elective neck irradiation strategies an overtreatment and show growing interest in a unilateral nodal irradiation in selected patients. The aim of this article is to give an overview of the current evidence about the indications and benefits of unilateral nodal irradiation and the use of SPECT/CT-guided nodal irradiation in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Nuyts
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Heleen Bollen
- Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Avrahram Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - June Corry
- Division of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Primoz Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Robert Smee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Remco DeBree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne W M Lee
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Alessandra Rinaldo
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Udine School of Medicine, Udine, Italy
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Arvanitakis M, Gkolfakis P, Despott EJ, Ballarin A, Beyna T, Boeykens K, Elbe P, Gisbertz I, Hoyois A, Mosteanu O, Sanders DS, Schmidt PT, Schneider SM, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of enteral tubes in adult patients - Part 1: Definitions and indications. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy 2021; 53:81-92. [PMID: 33260229 DOI: 10.1055/a-1303-7449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
ESGE recommends considering the following indications for enteral tube insertion: (i) clinical conditions that make oral intake impossible (neurological conditions, obstructive causes); (ii) acute and/or chronic diseases that result in a catabolic state where oral intake becomes insufficient; and (iii) chronic small-bowel obstruction requiring a decompression gastrostomy.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the use of temporary feeding tubes placed through a natural orifice (either nostril) in patients expected to require enteral nutrition (EN) for less than 4 weeks. If it is anticipated that EN will be required for more than 4 weeks, percutaneous access should be considered, depending on the clinical setting.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends the gastric route as the primary option in patients in need of EN support. Only in patients with altered/unfavorable gastric anatomy (e. g. after previous surgery), impaired gastric emptying, intolerance to gastric feeding, or with a high risk of aspiration, should the jejunal route be chosen.Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence.ESGE suggests that recent gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding due to peptic ulcer disease with risk of rebleeding should be considered to be a relative contraindication to percutaneous enteral access procedures, as should hemodynamic or respiratory instability.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE suggests that the presence of ascites and ventriculoperitoneal shunts should be considered to be additional risk factors for infection and, therefore, further preventive precautions must be taken in these cases.Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends that percutaneous tube placement (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG], percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with jejunal extension [PEG-J], or direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy [D-PEJ]) should be considered to be a procedure with high hemorrhagic risk, and that in order to reduce this risk, specific guidelines for antiplatelet or anticoagulant use should be followed strictly.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends refraining from PEG placement in patients with advanced dementia.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence.ESGE recommends refraining from PEG placement in patients with a life expectancy shorter than 30 days.Strong recommendation, low quality evidence*.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Edward J Despott
- Royal Free Unit for Endoscopy and Centre for Gastroenterology, UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, The Royal Free Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Asuncion Ballarin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Torsten Beyna
- Department of Gastroenterology and Therapeutic Endoscopy, Evangelisches Krankenhaus Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Kurt Boeykens
- Nutrition Support Team, AZ Nikolaas Hospital, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium
| | - Peter Elbe
- Department of Upper Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Gisbertz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Alice Hoyois
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ofelia Mosteanu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - David S Sanders
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital and University of Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Peter T Schmidt
- Department of Medicine (Solna), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Medicine, Ersta Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stéphane M Schneider
- Université Côte d'Azur, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Gastroentérologie et Nutrition, Nice, France
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nutritional Support in Head and Neck Radiotherapy Patients Considering HPV Status. Nutrients 2020; 13:nu13010057. [PMID: 33375430 PMCID: PMC7823874 DOI: 10.3390/nu13010057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Malnutrition is a common problem in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), including oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). It is caused by insufficient food intake due to dysphagia, odynophagia, and a lack of appetite caused by the tumor. It is also secondary to the oncological treatment of the basic disease, such as radiotherapy (RT) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT), as a consequence of mucositis with the dry mouth, loss of taste, and dysphagia. The severe dysphagia leads to a definitive total impossibility of eating through the mouth in 20–30% of patients. These patients usually require enteral nutritional support. Feeding tubes are a commonly used nutritional intervention during radiotherapy, most frequently percutaneous gastrostomy tube. Recently, a novel HPV-related type of OPC has been described. Patients with HPV-associated OPC are different from the HPV− ones. Typical HPV− OPC is associated with smoking and alcohol abuse. Patients with HPV+ OPC are younger and healthy (without comorbidities) at diagnosis compared to HPV− ones. Patients with OPC are at high nutritional risk, and therefore, they require nutritional support in order to improve the treatment results and quality of life. Some authors noted the high incidence of critical weight loss (CWL) in patients with HPV-related OPC. Other authors have observed the increased acute toxicities during oncological treatment in HPV+ OPC patients compared to HPV− ones. The aim of this paper is to review and discuss the indications for nutritional support and the kinds of nutrition, including immunonutrition (IN), in HNC, particularly OPC patients, undergoing RT/CRT, considering HPV status.
Collapse
|
16
|
Baijens LWJ, Walshe M, Aaltonen LM, Arens C, Cordier R, Cras P, Crevier-Buchman L, Curtis C, Golusinski W, Govender R, Eriksen JG, Hansen K, Heathcote K, Hess MM, Hosal S, Klussmann JP, Leemans CR, MacCarthy D, Manduchi B, Marie JP, Nouraei R, Parkes C, Pflug C, Pilz W, Regan J, Rommel N, Schindler A, Schols AMWJ, Speyer R, Succo G, Wessel I, Willemsen ACH, Yilmaz T, Clavé P. European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 278:577-616. [PMID: 33341909 PMCID: PMC7826315 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06507-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To develop a European White Paper document on oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in head and neck cancer (HNC). There are wide variations in the management of OD associated with HNC across Europe. Methods Experts in the management of specific aspects of OD in HNC across Europe were delegated by their professional medical and multidisciplinary societies to contribute to this document. Evidence is based on systematic reviews, consensus-based position statements, and expert opinion. Results Twenty-four sections on HNC-specific OD topics. Conclusion This European White Paper summarizes current best practice on management of OD in HNC, providing recommendations to support patients and health professionals. The body of literature and its level of evidence on diagnostics and treatment for OD in HNC remain poor. This is in the context of an expected increase in the prevalence of OD due to HNC in the near future. Contributing factors to increased prevalence include aging of our European population (including HNC patients) and an increase in human papillomavirus (HPV) related cancer, despite the introduction of HPV vaccination in various countries. We recommend timely implementation of OD screening in HNC patients while emphasizing the need for robust scientific research on the treatment of OD in HNC. Meanwhile, its management remains a challenge for European professional associations and policymakers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura W J Baijens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Margaret Walshe
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Leena-Maija Aaltonen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Christoph Arens
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Magdeburg, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Reinie Cordier
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Patrick Cras
- Department of Neurology, Born Bunge Institute, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lise Crevier-Buchman
- Voice, Speech, Swallowing Lab, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital UVSQ and Research lab CNRS-UMR7018, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France
| | - Chris Curtis
- Swallows Head and Neck Cancer Charity, Blackpool, UK
| | - Wojciech Golusinski
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Roganie Govender
- Head and Neck Cancer Centre, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kevin Hansen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kate Heathcote
- Robert White Centre for Airway, Voice and Swallow, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset, UK
| | - Markus M Hess
- Deutsche Stimmklinik, Hamburg, Germany.,Departement of Voice, Speech and Hearing Disorders, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sefik Hosal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Atılım University, Medicana International Ankara, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Jens Peter Klussmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - C René Leemans
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Denise MacCarthy
- Division of Restorative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin Dental University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Beatrice Manduchi
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Jean-Paul Marie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Reza Nouraei
- Department of Ear Nose and Throat Surgery, The Robert White Centre for Airway Voice and Swallowing, Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Claire Parkes
- Department of Speech and Language Therapy, St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Christina Pflug
- Departement of Voice, Speech and Hearing Disorders, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Walmari Pilz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Julie Regan
- Department of Clinical Speech and Language Studies, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Nathalie Rommel
- Department Neurosciences, Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, Deglutology, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antonio Schindler
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences "L. Sacco", University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Annemie M W J Schols
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Renee Speyer
- Department of Special Needs Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social Development, Victoria, Australia
| | - Giovanni Succo
- Head and Neck Oncology Service, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Irene Wessel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anna C H Willemsen
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Respiratory Medicine, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Taner Yilmaz
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pere Clavé
- Gastrointestinal Physiology Laboratory, Hospital de Mataró, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Mataró, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|