The impact of protein diet on bone density in people with/without chronic kidney disease: An analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database

Nutritional Intervention and Musculoskeletal Health in Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a leading condition in terms of prevalence and overall health impact. With the increased life expectancy of the CKD population and the improvement in medical care, controlling musculoskeletal complications remains a tough challenge. Patients with CKD are prone to falls, fractures and sarcopenia, enhancing the risk of death. A multitude of mechanisms contribute to fractures, and treatment is suboptimal; therefore, prevention must stand out as a key step. This review aims to provide an overview of the most relevant data regarding the impact of nutrition on bone disorders and sarcopenia in CKD. The newest relevant studies emphasize that plant protein intake is associated with a lower production of uremic toxins, lower serum phosphorus levels, and stronger bones. We conclude that patients with CKD should adopt specific diets tailored to the presence of osteoporosis, renal osteodystrophy, and muscle wasting. Low-protein diets or plant-dominant diets containing an adequate amount of protein could be better choices for predialysis patients with CKD in order to protect their bones and muscles, whereas in the dialysis population, a higher protein intake could be essential to prevent osteoporosis and sarcopenia. In all patients with CKD, focusing on antioxidant food intake could provide a strong antiaging benefit through ensuring good musculoskeletal health.

The association between bone density of lumbar spines and different daily protein intake in different renal function

BACKGROUND

Low protein intake (LPI) has been suggested as a treatment for chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, protein intake is essential for bone health.

METHODS

We studied the database of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2010. Basic variables, metabolic diseases, and bone density of different femoral areas were stratified into four subgroups according to different protein intake (DPI) (that is, <0.8, 0.8-1.0, 1.0-1.2, and >1.2 g/kg/day).

RESULTS

Significant differences were found among all lumbar area bone mineral density (BMD) and T-scores (p < 0.0001). There was an apparent trend between a decreasing BMD in the CKD groups with increasing DPI in all single lumbar spines (L1, L2, L3, and L4) and all L spines (L1-L4). Compared with DPI (0.8-1.0 g/day/kg), higher risks of osteoporosis were noticed in the subgroup of >1.2 g/day/kg over L2 (relative risk (RR)=1.326, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.062-1.656), subgroup >1.2 g/day/kg over L3 (RR = 1.31, 95%CI = 1.057-1.622), subgroup <0.8 g/day/kg over L4 (RR = 1.276, 95%CI = 1.015-1.605), subgroup <0.8 g/day/kg over all L spines (RR = 11.275, 95%CI = 1.051-1.548), and subgroup >1.2 g/day/kg over all L spines (RR = 0.333, 95%CI = 1.098-1.618). However, a higher risk of osteoporosis was observed only in the non-CKD group. There was an apparent trend of higher DPI coexisting with lower BMD and T scores in patients with CKD. For osteoporosis (reference:0.8-1.0 g/day/kg), lower (<0.8 g/day/kg) or higher DPI (>1.2 g/day/kg) was associated with higher risks in the non-CKD group, but not in the CKD group.

CONCLUSIONS

In the CKD group, LPI for renal protection was safe without threatening L spine bone density and without causing a higher risk of osteoporosis.

The effects of popular diets on bone health in the past decade: a narrative review

Bone health encompasses not only bone mineral density but also bone architecture and mechanical properties that can impact bone strength. While specific dietary interventions have been proposed to treat various diseases such as obesity and diabetes, their effects on bone health remain unclear. The aim of this review is to examine literature published in the past decade, summarize the effects of currently popular diets on bone health, elucidate underlying mechanisms, and provide solutions to neutralize the side effects. The diets discussed in this review include a ketogenic diet (KD), a Mediterranean diet (MD), caloric restriction (CR), a high-protein diet (HP), and intermittent fasting (IF). Although detrimental effects on bone health have been noticed in the KD and CR diets, it is still controversial, while the MD and HP diets have shown protective effects, and the effects of IF diets are still uncertain. The mechanism of these effects and the attenuation methods have gained attention and have been discussed in recent years: the KD diet interrupts energy balance and calcium metabolism, which reduces bone quality. Ginsenoside-Rb2, metformin, and simvastatin have been shown to attenuate bone loss during KD. The CR diet influences energy imbalance, glucocorticoid levels, and adipose tissue, causing bone loss. Adequate vitamin D and calcium supplementation and exercise training can attenuate these effects. The olive oil in the MD may be an effective component that protects bone health. HP diets also have components that protect bone health, but their mechanism requires further investigation. In IF, animal studies have shown detrimental effects on bone health, while human studies have not. Therefore, the effects of diets on bone health vary accordingly.

Effect of Low Protein Diet on Bone Structure of Young Wistar Mice

<b>Background and Objective:</b> Malnutrition and stunting are major unresolved problems in Indonesia. Protein deficiency can cause stunted growth, as well as make physical and cognitive abilities cannot reach their maximum potential. During childhood the need for protein must be fulfilled so that the peak of bone formation during adolescence can be perfect. In malnourished children, a low protein diet will lead to thinning of the bone cortex. Due to the high rate of stunting and malnutrition in children due to protein deficiency, a study was conducted on the effects of feeding low protein diet on rat bones. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Male Wistar rats (n = 10) at 6-8 weeks old (body weight around 250 g), control groups were fed a normal chow diet and low protein diet groups were given low protein chow diet (protein 5%) for 18 weeks, then the rats were sacrificed and the femoral bones were isolated. Body weight, femur weight, femur length were checked and bone density was examined using X-ray. <b>Results:</b> The body proportions of the low protein group rats were smaller and thinner than those of the control group. This difference is supported by the significant weight loss starting from the sixth week after low protein feeding. There are significant differences in body weight and femur weight between the control and low protein diet groups. Bone density decreases significantly in low protein diet group. Macroscopically, the femur length of the low protein group was shorter than the control group, however the femur length did not show significant differences statistically between the two groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> A low protein diet decreased the body weight of the rats, also causing impaired bone growth characterized by decreasing femur weight. The low protein diet also caused osteoporosis in the bones.

The association between dietary inflammation index and bone mineral density: results from the United States National Health and nutrition examination surveys

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the associations of dietary inflammation index (DII) with bone density and osteoporosis in different femoral areas.

METHODS

The study population was selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) with the exclusion criteria of age 18, pregnancy, or missing information on DII, femoral bone marrow density (BMD), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), or had diseases which may influence systemic inflammation. DII was calculated based on the questionnaire interview of dietary recall within 24 h. Subjects' baseline characteristics were collected. The associations between DII and different femoral areas were analyzed.

RESULTS

After applying exclusion criteria, 10,312 participants were included in the study. Significant differences among DII tertiles were found in BMD or T scores (p < .001) of the femoral neck, the trochanter, the intertrochanter, and the total femur. High DII was associated with low BMDs and T scores in all the femoral areas (all p < .01). Compared to low DII (tertile1, DII < 0.380 as reference), in the femoral neck, the intertrochanter, and the total femur, increased DII is independently associated with increased the possibility of the presence of osteoporosis (OR, 95% CI: 1.88, 1.11-3.20; 2.10, 1.05-4.20; 1.94, 1.02-3.69, respectively). However, this positive association was only observed in the trochanteric area of the non-Hispanic White population after full adjustment (OR, 95% CI: 3.22 (1.18, 8.79)). No significant difference in the association of DII and the presence of osteoporosis were found in subjects with or without impaired kidney function (eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m²).

CONCLUSION

High DII is independently related to declined femoral BMD of femoral areas.

Influence of dietary patterns and physical activity on bone mineral content and density, osteoporosis among children with stimulant use

AIM

To examine the relationship between dietary patterns (DPs) and physical activity (PA) on bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and osteoporosis in children with stimulant use.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study collected information on participants from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) via multistage stratified sampling. The baseline variables included the following: age, gender, the dietary approaches to stop hypertension (DASH) score, the Mediterranean diet (MD) score, and the Alternative Healthy Eating Index-2010 (AHEI-2010). The univariate and multivariate linear-regression analyses were carried out to explore the statistical correlation between the DPs and PA on BMC and BMD in children with stimulant use or non-stimulant use. In addition, we also investigated the association between DPs and PA on osteoporosis via logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 6,294 participants were eligibly enrolled in this study eventually. After adjusting age, gender, body mass index (BMI), race, family income, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and serum cotinine, the multivariate linear-regression analysis showed that the MD was positively associated with total femur BMD, total femur BMC, femoral neck BMD, and femoral neck BMC among stimulant use group; high PA was associated with total femur BMD, total femur BMC, femoral neck BMD, femoral neck BMC, lumbar spine BMD, lumbar spine BMC and osteoporosis in stimulant use group.

CONCLUSION

Improved adherence to MD, DASH, AHEI-2010 or increased physical activity may increase BMD, BMC and reduce the risk of osteoporosis; children with stimulant use should improve their adherence to the MD and do more PA compared with children without stimulant use.

The Influence of Dietary Interventions on Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD)

Chronic kidney disease is a health problem whose prevalence is increasing worldwide. The kidney plays an important role in the metabolism of minerals and bone health and therefore, even at the early stages of CKD, disturbances in bone metabolism are observed. In the course of CKD, various bone turnover or mineralization disturbances can develop including adynamic hyperparathyroid, mixed renal bone disease, osteomalacia. The increased risk of fragility fractures is present at any age in these patients. Nutritional treatment of patients with advanced stages of CKD is aiming at prevention or correction of signs, symptoms of renal failure, avoidance of protein-energy wasting (PEW), delaying or prevention of the occurrence of mineral/bone disturbances, and delaying the start of dialysis. The results of studies suggest that progressive protein restriction is beneficial with the progression of renal insufficiency; however, other aspects of dietary management of CKD patients, including changes in sodium, phosphorus, and energy intake, as well as the source of protein and lipids (animal or plant origin) should also be considered carefully. Energy intake must cover patients' energy requirement, in order to enable correct metabolic adaptation in the course of protein-restricted regimens and prevent negative nitrogen balance and protein-energy wasting.

Relationship between protein intake and bone architecture or bone mineral density among dynapenic-obese older adults

OBJECTIVE

The current study aimed to assess the relationship between protein intake and bone parameters among dynapenic-obese older adults.

DESIGN

The current study is a secondary analysis with an a posteriori and exploratory design.

SETTING

Subjects were recruited from the community via social communication (flyers and meetings in community centres) in the Great Montreal area.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-six subjects were divided a posteriori into two groups according to their usual protein intake: PROT-: < 1 g/kg per d (n 13; women: 53·8 %; 66·5 (sd 3·3) years) and PROT+: > 1·2 g/kg per d (n 13; women: 61·5 %; 67·2 (sd 2·7) years).

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable for age (PROT-: 66·5 (sd 3·3) v. PROT+: 67·2 (sd 2·7) years, P = 0·61) and gender (women: PROT-: n 7; 53·8 % v. PROT+: n 8; 61·5 %, P = 0·69). The PROT- group had a higher marrow area (P = 0·049), a greater bone compressive strength (P = 0·048) and a larger total bone area (P = 0·045) than the PROT+ group. However, no significant difference between the two groups was observed regarding body composition (fat and lean masses) or muscle composition.

CONCLUSIONS

A lower protein intake seems to be associated with bone sizes, which influence bone strength, but do not influence bone density among dynapenic-obese older people.