Bioavailable 25(OH)D level is associated with clinical outcomes of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: An exploratory study

A Systematic Review Assessing the Impact of Vitamin D Levels on Adult Patients with Lymphoid Malignancies

Vitamin D deficiency has been correlated with various conditions, including the risk of developing lymphoid malignancies. This systematic review aimed to assess the association between vitamin D levels at diagnosis of lymphoid malignancies, patient outcomes, and survival. A systematic review was conducted, encompassing 15 studies published until January 2023, involving 4503 patients, examining the relationship between vitamin D and lymphoid cancers. The median age of the patients was 56.5 years, with a median follow-up duration of approximately 36 months across studies. The overall median vitamin D level at initial measurement was 20.4 ng/mL, while a <20 ng/mL threshold was used to define vitamin D insufficiency. The results demonstrated significant associations between vitamin D levels and patient outcomes in several lymphoid malignancies, with a pooled risk in disease progression of 1.93 and a pooled hazard ratio of 2.06 for overall survival in patients with 25-(OH)D levels below the normal threshold of 20 ng/mL. Among findings, it was demonstrated that supplemental vitamin D improves the chemosensitivity of tumors by reducing the rate of tumor growth compared with vitamin D or chemotherapy alone. Vitamin D had a protective effect for patients with DLBCL under R-CHOP treatment, while vitamin D insufficiency was associated with the impairment of rituximab treatment and showed worse clinical outcomes in chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) recipients. Although one study found no association between vitamin D deficiency and the cause of death, most associated vitamin D insufficiency with early clinical failure and lower survival probability. In conclusion, his systematic review highlights the importance of vitamin D levels in the prognosis and survival of patients with lymphoid malignancies. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and explore the potential benefits of vitamin D supplementation in managing these cancers.

Vitamin D-Binding Protein, Bioavailable, and Free 25(OH)D, and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Observational studies reported inverse associations between serum total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations and mortality. Evolving evidence indicated, however, that bioavailable or free 25(OH)D may be even better predictors of mortality. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the epidemiological evidence on associations of vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), albumin-bound, bioavailable, and free 25(OH)D, with mortality. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and Web of Science, up to 27 May 2022. Predictors of interest included serum or plasma concentrations of VDBP, albumin-bound, bioavailable, and free 25(OH)D. Assessed health outcomes were all-cause and cause-specific mortality. We included studies reporting associations between these biomarkers and mortality outcomes. We applied random-effects models for meta-analyses to summarize results from studies assessing the same vitamin D biomarkers and mortality outcomes. Results: We identified twelve eligible studies, including ten on VDBP, eight on bioavailable 25(OH)D, and eight on free 25(OH)D. No study reported on albumin-bound 25(OH)D and mortality. In meta-analyses, the highest levels of bioavailable and free 25(OH)D were associated with 37% (hazard ratio (HR): 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.46, 0.87), and 29% (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.97) decrease in all-cause mortality, respectively, compared with the lowest levels. These estimates were similar to those for total 25(OH)D (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.56, 0.80) observed in the same studies. Higher VDBP levels were associated with lower all-cause mortality in cancer patient cohorts. However, no such association was observed in general population cohorts. Conclusions: Similar inverse associations of total, bioavailable, and free 25(OH)D with mortality suggest that bioavailable and free 25(OH)D do not provide incremental value in predicting mortality.

Vitamin D-binding protein, total, "nonbioavailable," bioavailable, and free 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and mortality in a large population-based cohort of older adults

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological studies consistently find low concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) in blood to be associated with increased mortality, and a recent large-scale Mendelian randomization study strongly supports a causal relationship among individuals with low vitamin D status. Evolving evidence suggested that bioavailable or free 25(OH)D may better predict mortality. We aimed to compare the prognostic values of vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), total, bioavailable, complementary "nonbioavailable", and free 25(OH)D for total and cause-specific mortality in a large population-based cohort study of older adults from Germany.

METHODS

Bioavailable, complementary "nonbioavailable", and free 25(OH)D concentrations were calculated among 5899 participants aged 50-75 years, based on serum concentrations of total 25(OH)D, VDBP, and albumin. The cohort was followed with respect to total and cause-specific mortality from recruitment in 2001-2002 up to the end of 2018. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the associations between various vitamin D biomarkers and mortality, and further stratified by vitamin D status.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 17.1 years, 1739 participants died, of whom 575, 584, and 94 died of cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and respiratory diseases, respectively. Very similar inverse associations with total mortality (hazard ratio (HR) per standard deviation decrease: 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 1.24 for total 25(OH)D; HR: 1.14, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.21 for bioavailable 25(OH)D; HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.18 for free 25(OH)D) and cause-specific mortalities were seen for all biomarkers of vitamin D status. The strongest associations were consistently seen for respiratory mortality. These inverse associations were strongest among participants with low vitamin D levels (<50 nmol/L). No significant associations were seen between VDBP and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Total, nonbioavailable, bioavailable, and free 25(OH)D showed very similar inverse associations with total and cause-specific mortality, which were strongest among those with low vitamin D status in this large population-based cohort.

Total, bioavailable and free 25-hydroxyvitamin D are associated with the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

To analyze the prognostic value of total, bioavailable and free 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] as well as vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

We prospectively collected and analyzed data for 395 patients diagnosed with NSCLC between January 2016 and December 2018 in two university-affiliated hospitals. Total and free 25(OH)D and VDBP were measured directly, and bioavailable 25(OH)D was calculated using a validated formula. Their prognostic values were evaluated by Cox proportional hazards model, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Patients with NSCLC had significantly lower levels of total, bioavailable, and free 25(OH)D and higher VDBP levels in comparison to healthy controls (all p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, higher levels of total, bioavailable, and free 25(OH)D were independently associated better overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). For OS, the adjusted HRs were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.40-0.87; p for trend = 0.008), 0.45 (95% CI, 0.30-0.67; p for trend < 0.001) and 0.49 (95% CI, 0.33-0.73; p for trend < 0.001) for the highest versus the lowest tertile of total, bioavailable and free 25(OH)D, respectively. The corresponding adjusted HRs for PFS were 0.61 (95% CI, 0.43-0.86; p for trend = 0.006), 0.56 (95% CI, 0.40-0.80; p for trend = 0.001) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.42-0.85; p for trend = 0.004), respectively. However, VDBP was not associated with either OS or PFS.

CONCLUSION

The current study suggested that total, bioavailable and free 25(OH)D may be reliable prognosis indicators in NSCLC patients, though the optimal 25(OH)D form for NSCLC prognosis remains to be assessed in future studies.

Lower Survival and Increased Circulating Suppressor Cells in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with Deficit of Vitamin D Levels Using R-GDP Plus Lenalidomide (R2-GDP): Results from the R2-GDP-GOTEL Trial

The search of prognostic factors is a priority in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) due to its aggressiveness. We have recently found that the level of circulating MDSCs is a good marker of survival in a translational study based on a trial (EudraCT Number: 2014-001620-29), using lenalidomide combined with R-GDP (rituximab plus gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone). Since Vitamin D is a known immunomodulator, we have studied blood levels of these cell populations comparing patients with deficit of vitamin D levels (<15 ng/mL with those with normal levels >15 ng/mL. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare cells distributions between groups, Wilcoxon test to compare cells distribution at different times and Spearman test to measure the association between cell populations. Patients with vitamin D deficit maintained the increased level of immune suppressor cells, whereas we observed a depletion of all immune suppressor cells in patients with normal vitamin D levels. In conclusion, we have confirmed the importance of vitamin D in the response to treatment in R/R DLBCL, suggesting that vitamin D deficit may be involved in the immune deficit of these patients, and thus, vitamin D supplementation in these patients may help to obtain a better response, warranting further investigation.

Impact of vitamin D level at diagnosis and transplantation on the prognosis of hematological malignancy: a meta-analysis

Vitamin D deficiency impairs prognosis in many types of cancer; however, its significance in each subtype of hematological malignancies is unclear. In addition, data on the association between pretransplant vitamin D levels and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are inconsistent. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the impact of vitamin D levels at diagnosis or pre-HSCT on the prognosis of hematological malignancies. Thirty articles and abstracts were extracted from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases and conference proceedings. Fixed and random effect models were used to analyze primary outcomes: overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Lower vitamin D level was significantly associated with poorer OS and PFS in myeloid malignancies (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.82 and HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.23-3.32, respectively) and lymphoid malignancies (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.79-2.40 and HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.61-2.25, respectively), as well as outcomes for several lymphoma subtypes individually. Furthermore, a lower pretransplant vitamin D level was associated with poorer OS in autologous and allogeneic HSCT (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.04-2.61 and HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.03-2.18, respectively). Despite the relatively small number of studies evaluated, these data suggest the importance of vitamin D status in outcomes of hematological malignancies (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020205821).

The role of vitamin D and vitamin D deficiency in orthopaedics and traumatology-a narrative overview of the literature

Vitamin D is considered to play an important role in musculoskeletal health. It’s classical function is the regulation of calcium and phosphate homeostasis, thus ensuring a balanced bone metabolism that is characterised by an equal amount of bone resorption and bone formation. In the past decades, a plethora of pre-clinical and clinical studies reporting on potential health-beneficial properties of vitamin D have emerged. Moreover, there is an abundance of reports highlighting vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in patients with almost innumerable diseases. Further, it is estimated that more than one billion people globally are affected by insufficient vitamin D levels. As such, research on vitamin D has been particularly popular over the past years. In orthopaedics and traumatology, most studies describe favourable effects of vitamin D in general. However, the relative importance of vitamin D is oftentimes debated. In this narrative review of the literature, we consider first, the properties of vitamin D and how vitamin D, vitamin D deficiency and the vitamin D receptor (VDR) impact on musculoskeletal health. Secondly, we provide an overview of studies reporting the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in traumatology and diverse orthopaedic diseases including bone oncology. Lastly, we emphasise recent findings and touch on future perspectives in vitamin D research.

Meta-analysis of the prognostic and clinical value of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in previously untreated lymphoma

Background: This meta-analysis explored the prognostic and clinical value of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 25(OH)D, levels in previously untreated lymphoma. Materials & methods: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for eligible studies. Summary effect estimates and 95% CIs were pooled using random-effects or fixed-effects models. Results: Twelve studies with 4139 patients were included. Low level of serum 25(OH)D was associated with inferior progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.82-2.32) and overall survival (HR: 1.94; 95% CI: 1.71-2.19), advanced disease (odds ratio [OR]: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.09-2.13) and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 1.08-3.15). Conclusions: Low level of serum 25(OH)D is a prognostic risk factor for newly diagnosed lymphoma.

Does vitamin D deficiency predict tumour malignancy in patients with bone tumours? Data from a multi-center cohort analysis

•

Vitamin D deficiency is common in patients with bone tumours.

•

Potential association between pre-diagnostic vitamin D status and tumour malignancy in patients with bone tumours.

•

25(OH)D status should routinely be assessed and monitored in patients with bone tumours.

Vitamin D deficiency is a global health concern that is estimated to afflict over one billion people globally. The major role of vitamin D is that of a regulator of calcium and phosphate metabolism, thus, being essential for proper bone mineralisation. Concomitantly, vitamin D is known to exert numerous extra-skeletal actions. For example, it has become evident that vitamin D has direct anti-proliferative, pro-differentiation and pro-apoptotic actions on cancer cells. Hence, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased cancer risk and worse prognosis in several malignancies. We have recently demonstrated that vitamin D deficiency promotes secondary cancer growth in bone. These findings were partly attributable to an increase in bone remodelling but also through direct effects of vitamin D on cancer cells. To date, very little is known about vitamin D status of patients with bone tumours in general. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess vitamin D status of patients with diverse bone tumours. Moreover, the aim was to elucidate whether or not there is an association between pre-diagnostic vitamin D status and tumour malignancy in patients with bone tumours.

In a multi-center analysis, 25(OH)D, PTH and calcium levels of 225 patients that presented with various bone tumours between 2017 and 2018 were assessed. Collectively, 76% of all patients had insufficient vitamin D levels with a total mean 25(OH)D level of 21.43 ng/ml (53.58 nmol/L). In particular, 52% (117/225) of patients were identified as vitamin D deficient and further 24% of patients (55/225) were vitamin D insufficient. Notably, patients diagnosed with malignant bone tumours had significantly lower 25(OH)D levels than patients diagnosed with benign bone tumours [19.3 vs. 22.75 ng/ml (48.25 vs. 56.86 nmol/L); p = 0.04).

In conclusion, we found a widespread and distressing rate of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in patients with bone tumours. However, especially for patients with bone tumours sufficient vitamin D levels seem to be of great importance. Thus, we believe that 25(OH)D status should routinely be monitored in these patients. Collectively, there should be an increased awareness for physicians to assess and if necessary correct vitamin D status of patients with bone tumours in general or of those at great risk of developing bone tumours.