Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Promoter Polymorphism is Not Associated With the Aggressiveness of Disease in Prostate Cancer

A Narrative Review on Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 and Its (Patho)Physiological Role: To Target or Not to Target?

Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) is the main physiological inhibitor of plasminogen activators (PAs) and is therefore an important inhibitor of the plasminogen/plasmin system. Being the fast-acting inhibitor of tissue-type PA (tPA), PAI-1 primarily attenuates fibrinolysis. Through inhibition of urokinase-type PA (uPA) and interaction with biological ligands such as vitronectin and cell-surface receptors, the function of PAI-1 extends to pericellular proteolysis, tissue remodeling and other processes including cell migration. This review aims at providing a general overview of the properties of PAI-1 and the role it plays in many biological processes and touches upon the possible use of PAI-1 inhibitors as therapeutics.

The plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 paradox in cancer: a mechanistic understanding

The paradoxical pro-tumorigenic function of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1, aka Serpin E1) in cancer progression and metastasis has been the subject of an abundant scientific literature that has pointed to a pro-angiogenic role, a growth and migration stimulatory function, and an anti-apoptotic activity, all directed toward promoting tumor growth, cancer cell survival, and metastasis. With uPA, PAI-1 is among the most reliable biomarkers and prognosticators in many cancer types. More recently, a novel pro-tumorigenic function of PAI-1 in cancer-related inflammation has been demonstrated. These multifaceted activities of PAI-1 in cancer progression are explained by the complex structure of PAI-1 and its multiple functions that go beyond its anti-fibrinolytic and anti-plasminogen activation activities. However, despite the multiple evidences supporting a pro-tumorigenic role of PAI-1 in cancer, and the development of several inhibitors, targeting PAI-1, has remained elusive. In this article, the various mechanisms responsible for the pro-tumorigenic functions of PAI-1 are reviewed with emphasis on its more recently described contribution to cancer inflammation. The challenges of targeting PAI-1 in cancer therapy are then discussed.

Evolving role of uPA/uPAR system in human cancers

Recent advancements in cancer research have led to some major breakthroughs; however, the impact on overall cancer-related death rate remains unacceptable, suggesting that further insight into tumor markers and development of targeted therapies is urgently needed. The urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) system represents a family of serine proteases that are involved in the degradation of basement membrane and the extracellular matrix, leading to tumor cell invasion and metastasis. In this review, we have provided an overview of emerging data, from basic research as well as clinical studies, highlighting the evolving role of uPA/uPAR system in tumor progression. It is currently believed that the expression and activation of uPA plays an important role in tumorigenicity, and high endogenous levels of uPA and uPAR are associated with advanced metastatic cancers. The endogenous inhibitors of this system, PAI-1 and PAI-2, regulate uPA-uPAR activity by either direct inhibition or affecting cell surface expression and internalization. PAI-1's role in cancers is rather unusual; on one hand, it inhibits uPA-uPAR leading to inhibition of invasion and metastasis and on the other it has been reported to facilitate tumor growth and angiogenesis. Individual components of uPA/uPAR system are reported to be differentially expressed in cancer tissues compared to normal tissues and, thus, have the potential to be developed as prognostic and/or therapeutic targets. Therefore, this system represents a highly attractive target that warrants further in-depth studies. Such studies are likely to contribute towards the development of molecularly-driven targeted therapies in the near future.

Plasminogen Activation Inhibitor-1 Improves the Predictive Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Nomograms

PURPOSE

We tested whether the addition of preoperative circulating plasminogen activator inhibitor type I levels improves the accuracy of standard preoperative and postoperative models for prediction of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative plasma levels of plasminogen activator inhibitor type I were measured in 429 consecutive patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. The patients were randomly divided into a development (67%, 286) and a split sample validation cohort (33%, 143). Cox regression analysis was used to develop prognostic nomograms for prediction of biochemical recurrence.

RESULTS

In standard univariate analyses categorically coded preoperative plasminogen activator inhibitor type I was significantly associated with biochemical recurrence (p <0.001). In standard preoperative and postoperative multivariate analyses preoperative plasminogen activator inhibitor type I was independently associated with biochemical recurrence (p <0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). In the split sample validation cohort the addition of plasminogen activator inhibitor type I increased the predictive accuracy of the preoperative multivariate model by 1.2%, 7.7%, 10.3%, 6.7% and 5.4% at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively (p values <0.001). Moreover, the addition of plasminogen activator inhibitor type I increased the predictive accuracy of the postoperative model by 0.5%, 1.1%, 4.0%, 2.4% and 3.6% at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively (p values <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative circulating plasminogen activator inhibitor type I is a predictor of biochemical recurrence, and it enhances the accuracy of preoperative and postoperative nomograms. After external validation these nomograms may assist clinical decision making regarding treatment choice and followup as well as identification of patients at high risk for biochemical recurrence who may benefit from neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant treatment.