1
|
Umezawa R, Mizuma M, Nakagawa K, Yamamoto T, Takahashi N, Suzuki Y, Kishida K, Omata S, Unno M, Jingu K. Clinical impact of multimodal treatment including chemoradiotherapy, conversion surgery and postoperative chemotherapy for borderline resectable and unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer without disease progression after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel. Pancreatology 2023; 23:650-656. [PMID: 37453848 DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to investigate treatment outcomes of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using S-1 with or without conversion surgery after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) for borderline resectable (BR) and unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) pancreatic cancer. METHODS From 2016 to 2020, patients without disease progression after GnP for BR or UR-LA pancreatic cancer underwent CRT with S-1. If distant metastasis was not detected after CRT, conversion surgery and oral administration of S-1 as postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for at least 6 months was performed. RESULTS Forty patients were included in the present study. The median number of cycles of GnP was 6. Surgery was performed after CRT in 25 patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) periods from the start of radiotherapy were 24.6 and 27.4 months, respectively. The OS periods from the start of radiotherapy in patients who underwent conversion surgery and those who did not undergo conversion surgery were 41.3 and 16.8 months, respectively. The PFS periods from the start of radiotherapy in patients who underwent surgery and those who did not undergo surgery were 28.3 and 8.6 months, respectively. Patients who were able to receive S-1 after conversion surgery for more than 6 months had better OS than those who were not (p = 0.039), although there was no significant difference of PFS (p = 0.365). CONCLUSIONS In BR/UR-LA pancreatic cancer without disease progression after GnP, multimodal treatment including CRT, conversion surgery and the scheduled postoperative chemotherapy may be effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
| | - Masamichi Mizuma
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Kei Nakagawa
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Takaya Yamamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Noriyoshi Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yu Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keita Kishida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - So Omata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elkhamisy SA, Valentini C, Lattermann A, Radhakrishna G, Künzel LA, Löck S, Troost EGC. Normo- or Hypo-Fractionated Photon or Proton Radiotherapy in the Management of Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3771. [PMID: 37568587 PMCID: PMC10416887 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153771] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
LAPC is associated with a poor prognosis and requires a multimodal treatment approach. However, the role of radiation therapy in LAPC treatment remains controversial. This systematic review aimed to explore the role of proton and photon therapy, with varying radiation techniques and fractionation, in treatment outcomes and their respective toxicity profiles. METHODS Clinical studies published from 2012 to 2022 were systematically reviewed using PubMed, MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Cochrane databases. Different radiotherapy-related data were extracted and analyzed. RESULTS A total of 31 studies matched the inclusion criteria. Acute toxicity was less remarkable in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) compared to conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT), while in proton beam therapy (PBT) grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was observed more commonly with doses of 67.5 Gy (RBE) or higher. Late toxicity was not reported in most studies; therefore, comparison between groups was not possible. The range of median overall survival (OS) for the CFRT and SBRT groups was 9.3-22.9 months and 8.5-20 months, respectively. For the PBT group, the range of median OS was 18.4-22.3 months. CONCLUSION CFRT and SBRT showed comparable survival outcomes with a more favorable acute toxicity profile for SBRT. PBT is a promising new treatment modality; however, additional clinical studies are needed to support its efficacy and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally A. Elkhamisy
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura 35516, Egypt
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Chiara Valentini
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Annika Lattermann
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Luise A. Künzel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Esther G. C. Troost
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01307 Dresden, Germany; (S.A.E.); (A.L.)
- The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M20 4BX, UK;
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf (HZDR), 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yamada S, Fujii T, Yamamoto T, Takami H, Yoshioka I, Yamaki S, Sonohara F, Shibuya K, Motoi F, Hirano S, Murakami Y, Inoue H, Hayashi M, Hashimoto D, Murotani K, Kitayama J, Ishikawa H, Kodera Y, Sekimoto M, Satoi S. Conversion surgery in patients with pancreatic cancer and peritoneal metastasis. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 12:S110-S117. [PMID: 33968431 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is among the most lethal malignancies globally. We have previously explored the clinical efficacy of intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel therapy for patients with PDAC and peritoneal metastasis, which demonstrated favourable response and disease control rates. However, the real implications of conversion surgery after IP therapy remain unclear. Methods We conducted two multicenter clinical trials of IP therapy with paclitaxel in patients with PDAC and peritoneal metastasis. We focused on patients who underwent conversion surgery and investigated the long-term outcomes, particularly, initial recurrence patterns and long-term survival. Results Seventy-nine patients with PDAC and peritoneal metastasis were treated, and 33 (41.8%) patients received SP (intravenous IP paclitaxel with S-1) and 46 (58.3%) were administered GAP (intravenous gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel combined with IP paclitaxel) combination therapy. Of the 79 patients, 16 (20.3%) underwent conversion surgery. The median time to surgery was 9.0 (range, 4.1-13.0) months after the initiation of chemotherapy. Finally, 13 (81.3%) patients underwent R0 resection. Evans grade was IIA in nine patients, IIB in four patients, III in two patients, and IV in one patient. The median overall survival time in patients who underwent conversion surgery was 32.5 (range, 13.5-66.9) months. Twelve (75.0%) patients were found to have experienced recurrence after conversion surgery. Especially, peritoneal recurrence was observed in 50% of patients as the initial recurrence pattern. The median recurrence-free survival time was 9.2 (range, 5.1-32.8) months, and three patients have survived without recurrence to date. Conclusions Our IP therapy displays promising clinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability in patients with PDAC and peritoneal metastasis. Although we could observe some super-responders in the cohort, further improvements in IP therapy are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suguru Yamada
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Fujii
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | | | - Hideki Takami
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Isaku Yoshioka
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - So Yamaki
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Fuminori Sonohara
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Kazuto Shibuya
- Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine, Academic Assembly, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Fuyuhiko Motoi
- Department of Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshiak Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Inoue
- Department of HBP and Breast Surgery, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Masamichi Hayashi
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya, Japan
| | | | - Kenta Murotani
- Biostatistics Centre, Graduate School of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Joji Kitayama
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishikawa
- Department of Molecular-Targeting Cancer Prevention, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Gastroenterological Surgery, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mitsugu Sekimoto
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Sohei Satoi
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Umezawa R, Ito Y, Wakita A, Nakamura S, Okamoto H, Takahashi K, Inaba K, Murakami N, Igaki H, Jingu K, Itami J. How Much Was the Elective Lymph Node Region Covered in Involved-Field Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer? Evaluation of Overlap Between Gross Target Volume and Celiac Artery-Superior Mesenteric Artery Lymph Node Regions. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:377-387. [PMID: 32529131 PMCID: PMC7278027 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2019.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2019] [Revised: 08/24/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the overlaps between gross target volume (GTV) and the celiac artery (CA) and superior mesenteric artery (SMA) lymph node regions and to examine the dose incidentally irradiated to the CA and SMA lymph node regions by involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods and Materials Fifty-nine patients who had LAPC without distant metastasis were included. They received IFRT at 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. We calculated the percentages of overlap of GTV in the CA and SMA lymph node regions and examined what cases tend to have an overlap. We also investigated the dose metrics of CA and SMA lymph node regions by IFRT and the frequency of CA or SMA lymph node metastasis after IFRT. Results The median GTV volume was 52.2 mL. Median overlap percentages in the CA and SMA lymph node regions were 39.2% and 28.6%, respectively. There was a significant correlation between GTV volume and SMA overlap percentage (P < .001). Although the SMA overlap percentage was higher in the pancreas head (P = .028), the CA overlap percentage was higher in the pancreas body or tail (P = .002). Median mean dose, D95, and minimum dose in the CA lymph node region were 50.1 Gy, 48.7 Gy, and 45.9 Gy, respectively, and those in the SMA lymph node region 49.9 Gy, 47.3 Gy, and 39.2 Gy, respectively. CA lymph node metastases after IFRT were detected in 4 patients (6.8%). Conclusions An overlap between GTV and CA-SMA lymph node regions was detected in many patients, and the CA and SMA lymph node regions were irradiated incidentally even by IFRT. Prophylactic lymph node regions might not be necessary in radiation therapy planning of LAPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rei Umezawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihisa Wakita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Nakamura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Okamoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kana Takahashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Inaba
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Igaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichi Jingu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | - Jun Itami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Takano N, Yamada S, Hirakawa A, Yokoyama Y, Kawashima H, Maeda O, Okada T, Ohno E, Yamaguchi J, Ishikawa T, Sonohara F, Suenaga M, Takami H, Hayashi M, Niwa Y, Hirooka Y, Ito Y, Naganawa S, Ando Y, Nagino M, Goto H, Fujii T, Kodera Y. Phase II study of chemoradiotherapy combined with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (NUPAT 05 Trial): study protocol for a single arm phase II study. NAGOYA JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE 2019; 81:233-239. [PMID: 31239592 PMCID: PMC6556455 DOI: 10.18999/nagjms.81.2.233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The efficacy of nab-paclitaxel combined with gemcitabine (GnP) and of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (UR-LA PDAC) is still unclear. We previously conducted a phase I study of CRT using GnP and determined the recommended dose and have now designed a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of CRT incorporating GnP for UR-LA PDAC. Eligibility criteria are chemotherapy-naïve patients with UR-LA PDAC as defined by the NCCN guidelines version 2. 2016. Study patients will receive 100 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel and 800 mg/m2 gemcitabine on Days 1, 8, and 15 per 4-week cycle with concurrent radiation therapy (total dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy per day, 5 days per week). Treatment will be continued until disease progression or surgery, which is to be performed only for patients in whom the disease is well-controlled at 8 months from beginning the protocol treatment. Primary endpoint is 2-year overall survival rate and co-primary endpoint is resection rate. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, progression free survival, time to treatment failure, response rate, disease control rate, early tumor shrinkage, depth of response, reduction of SUV-max on PET–CT, serum tumor markers, relative dose intensity, safety, and Quality of life. This study will show the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy combined with GnP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nao Takano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Suguru Yamada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Akihiro Hirakawa
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukihiro Yokoyama
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kawashima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Osamu Maeda
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tohru Okada
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Eizaburo Ohno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Takuya Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Fuminori Sonohara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masaya Suenaga
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hideki Takami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masamichi Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yukiko Niwa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Hirooka
- Department of Endoscopy, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Ito
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Shinji Naganawa
- Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yuichi Ando
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Chemotherapy, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Masato Nagino
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Hidemi Goto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Fujii
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Toyama, Toyama, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kodera
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery (Surgery II), Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hank T, Strobel O. Conversion Surgery for Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8111945. [PMID: 31718103 PMCID: PMC6912686 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8111945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 11/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
While primarily unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) used to be an indication for palliative therapy, a strategy of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and conversion surgery is being increasingly used after more effective chemotherapy regimens have become available for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. While high-level evidence from prospective studies is still sparse, several large retrospective studies have recently reported their experience with NAT and conversion surgery for LAPC. This review aims to provide a current overview about different NAT regimens, conversion rates, survival outcomes and determinants of post-resection outcomes, as well as surgical strategies in the context of conversion surgery after NAT. FOLFIRINOX is the predominant regimen used and associated with the highest reported conversion rates. Conversion rates considerably vary between less than 5% and more than half of the study population with heterogeneous long-term outcomes, owing to a lack of intention-to-treat analyses in most studies and a high heterogeneity in resectability criteria, treatment strategies, and reporting among studies. Since radiological criteria of local resectability are no longer applicable after NAT, patients without progressive disease should undergo surgical exploration. Surgery after NAT has to be aimed at local radicality around the peripancreatic vessels and should be performed in expert centers. Future studies in this rapidly evolving field need to be prospective, analyze intention-to-treat populations, report stringent and objective inclusion criteria and criteria for resection. Innovative regimens for NAT in combination with a radical surgical approach hold high promise for patients with LAPC in the future.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lambert A, Schwarz L, Borbath I, Henry A, Van Laethem JL, Malka D, Ducreux M, Conroy T. An update on treatment options for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2019; 11:1758835919875568. [PMID: 31598142 PMCID: PMC6763942 DOI: 10.1177/1758835919875568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 131] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal solid organ tumors. Due to the rising incidence, late diagnosis, and limited treatment options, it is expected to be the second leading cause of cancer deaths in high income countries in the next decade. The multidisciplinary treatment of this disease depends on the stage of cancer at diagnosis (resectable, borderline, locally advanced, and metastatic disease), and combines surgery, chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and supportive care. The landscape of multidisciplinary pancreatic cancer treatment is changing rapidly, especially in locally advanced disease, and the number of treatment options in metastatic disease, including personalized medicine, innovative targets, immunotherapy, therapeutic vaccines, adoptive T-cell transfer, or stemness inhibitors, will probably expand in the near future. This review summarizes the current literature and provides an overview of how new therapies or new therapeutic strategies (neoadjuvant therapies, conversion surgery) will guide multidisciplinary disease management, future clinical trials, and, hopefully, will increase overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurélien Lambert
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine and Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Lilian Schwarz
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Rouen University Hospital and Université de Rouen Normandie, France
| | - Ivan Borbath
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc and Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Aline Henry
- Department of Supportive Care in Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - David Malka
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Thierry Conroy
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 50519 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy CEDEX, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen J, Chen L, Yu J, Xu Y, Wang X, Zeng Z, Liu N, Xu F, Yang S. Meta‑analysis of current chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic cancer to prolong survival and reduce treatment‑associated toxicities. Mol Med Rep 2019; 19:477-489. [PMID: 30431091 PMCID: PMC6297739 DOI: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Unresectable advanced pancreatic cancer (APC) is a highly lethal malignancy. Although numerous chemotherapeutic regimens are available, evidence regarding the survival extension, the life quality improvement, the associated risks and occurrence rates of adverse effects, is required. The effects of 19 chemotherapy regimens on survival and treatment‑associated toxicities in the context of APC treatment were comparatively assessed. A total of 23 randomized controlled trials were included in this network meta‑analysis. For overall survival, five regimens, Gemcitabine (Gem)+radiotherapy (Radio), Gem+cisplatin (Cis), Gem+erlotinib (Erl)+bevacizumab (Bev), Gem+capecitabine (Cap)+Erl, and Gem+exatecan, were the most effective treatments, according to their respective high surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Regarding the progression‑free survival, five regimens, including Gem+Radio, Gem+Erl+Bev, Gem+Cis, Gem+Cap+Erl and Gem+pemetrexed, were the most effective treatments based on their SUCRA probabilities. Each regimen exhibited advantages and disadvantages, and 14 common treatment‑associated toxicities were present in different proportions. The three principal toxic effects included haematological, gastrointestinal and constitutional symptoms. To improve survival, chemotherapy regimens with high SUCRA probabilities require prioritizing. Although treatment‑associated toxicities are unavoidable, the regimens presented toxicities in distinct proportions. Therefore, clinicians should assess the disease status of the patients, and balance the benefits and risks of the selected treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Chen
- School of Chinese Medicine, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, SAR 999077, P.R. China
- Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, P.R. China
| | - Linli Chen
- Division of General Practice, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Jianping Yu
- Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, P.R. China
| | - Yanmei Xu
- Division of General Practice, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P.R. China
| | - Xiaohui Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Bayingol Mongolia Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 841300, P.R. China
| | - Ziqian Zeng
- Public Health School, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, P.R. China
| | - Ning Liu
- Department of Medicine, Sunshine Guojian Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201203, P.R. China
| | - Fan Xu
- Public Health School, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, P.R. China
- Interdisciplinary Division of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, SAR 999077, P.R. China
| | - Shu Yang
- Public Health School, Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Evaluation of Bony Anatomy Versus Endobiliary Stents as Surrogates for Volumetric Image Guidance in Pancreatic Cancer. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2017; 48:352-359. [PMID: 31047470 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2017.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2016] [Revised: 03/24/2017] [Accepted: 03/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Online treatment setup verification through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in pancreatic cancer patients is limited by low soft tissue contrast. This study aims to quantify the relative positional displacements between bony anatomy and endobiliary stents as surrogates for pancreatic cancers. METHODS Under ethics approval, 258 localization CBCT images from 15 pancreatic patients with endobiliary stents were evaluated. CBCTs were registered through two methods to assess translations and rotations: target adjacent bony anatomy through automatic registration and automatic stent registration through a shaped region of interest. Displacement vector differences between surrogate registrations were calculated and analysed. RESULTS Mean (±standard deviation) translational displacements in the right/left, superior/inferior, anterior/posterior directions were 0.9 ± 3.1 mm, 1.8 ± 4.2 mm, and 0.4 ± 2.5 mm for bone registrations, respectively, and 0.9 ± 5.6 mm, -1.5 ± 5.7 mm, and -0.5 ± 4.3 mm for stent registrations, respectively. Mean (±standard deviation) rotational displacements for pitch, roll, and yaw were 0.16 ± 0.97°, -0.32 ± 0.96°, and -0.77 ± 1.8° for bone registrations, respectively, and -0.94 ± 4.6°, -0.4 ± 7.4°, and -0.13 ± 6.64° for stent registrations, respectively. Mean displacement vector between surrogates was 4 mm, with 43% of fractions measuring displacement vectors >5 mm. A maximum displacement vector of 22.6 mm between surrogates was observed. CONCLUSIONS Varying positional differences were observed between bone and stent registration for pancreas CBCT-image-guided radiation therapy. Setup errors for stent matching were larger than bone registrations. Further research is required to determine if endobiliary stent position is equivalent to the pancreas' location to determine its suitability as a surrogate.
Collapse
|
10
|
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (gemcitabine-based) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: the Pisa University experience. TUMORI JOURNAL 2017; 103:577-582. [PMID: 28708229 DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) is controversial. In this study we aimed to assess the feasibility, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (gemcitabine based) in patients with resected PA and their correlation with prognostic factors. METHODS 122 resected patients (stage ≥IIa) treated between February 1999 and December 2013 were analyzed. Two cycles of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 every 28 days) were administered before concomitant radiotherapy (45 Gy/25 fractions) and chemotherapy (gemcitabine 300 mg/m2 weekly). RESULTS Median follow-up was 22.7 months (range 4-109). Gastrointestinal toxicity (G3), neutropenia (G3-G4) and cardiac toxicity (G2-G3) were observed in 2.4%, 10.6% and 1.6% of patients, respectively. OS at 12, 24 and 60 months was 79%, 55% and 31%, respectively (median 25 months). Two-year OS in patients with postoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≤70 and ≥80 was 37.1% and 62.3%, respectively (p<0.0001). OS was better in the group of patients with a postoperative CA 19-9 level ≤100 U/mL (p = 0.014). Median DFS was 17 months. CONCLUSIONS The combination of concomitant gemcitabine and radiotherapy in patients with radically resected PA was well tolerated and associated with a low incidence of local recurrences. Five-year OS was significantly influenced by postoperative KPS and CA 19-9 values.
Collapse
|
11
|
Chang JS, Chiu YF, Yu JC, Chen LT, Ch'ang HJ. The Role of Consolidation Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancer Res Treat 2017; 50:562-574. [PMID: 28602054 PMCID: PMC5912129 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2017.105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/31/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The role of consolidation chemoradiation (CCRT) after systemic chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) is still controversial. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of CCRT in LAPC using systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Materials and Methods Prospective clinical trials of LAPC receiving chemotherapy with or without subsequent CCRT were included in the analysis. We systematically searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The primary outcome of interest was 1-year survival. Secondary endpoints were median overall survival, progression-free survival, toxicity, and resection rate. Results Forty-one studies with 49 study arms were included with a total of 1,018 patients receiving CCRT after induction chemotherapy (ICT) and 954 patients receiving chemotherapy alone. CCRT after ICT did not improve 1-year survival significantly in LAPC patients compared with chemotherapy alone (58% vs. 52%). ICT lasted for at least 3 months revealed significantly improved survival of additional CCRT to LAPC patients compared to chemotherapy alone (65% vs. 52%). A marginal survival benefit of consolidation CCRT was noted in studies using maintenance chemotherapy (59% vs. 52%), and fluorouracil-based CCRT (64% vs. 52%), as well as in studies conducted after the 2010 (64% vs. 55%). Conclusion The survival benefit of ICT+CCRT over chemotherapy alone in treating LAPC was noted when ICT lasted for at least 3 months. Fluorouracil-based CCRT, and maintenance chemotherapy were associated with improved clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey S Chang
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Feng Chiu
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
| | - Jih-Chang Yu
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Tzong Chen
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Ju Ch'ang
- National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan.,Program for Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Taipei Cancer Center, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Woo SM, Kim MK, Joo J, Yoon KA, Park B, Park SJ, Han SS, Lee JH, Hong EK, Kim YH, Moon H, Kong SY, Kim TH, Lee WJ. Induction Chemotherapy with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Followed by Simultaneous Integrated Boost-Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy with Concurrent Gemcitabine for Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Results from a Feasibility Study. Cancer Res Treat 2017; 49:1022-1032. [PMID: 28111423 PMCID: PMC5654154 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2016.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study assessed the feasibility and compliance of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by simultaneous integrated boost-intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) with concurrent gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this trial, patients received induction chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2) and cisplatin (25 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each treatment cycle. Patients were subsequently treated with gemcitabine (300 mg/m2/wk) during SIB-IMRT. The patients received total doses of 55 and 44 Gy in 22 fractions to planning target volume 1 and 2, respectively. As an ancillary study, digital polymerase chain reaction was performed to screen for the seven most common mutations in codons 12 and 13 of the KRAS oncogene of circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA). RESULTS Forty-four patients were enrolled between 2012 and 2015. Of these, 33 (75%) completed the treatment. The most common toxicities during induction chemotherapy were grades 3 and 4 neutropenia (18.2%), grade 3 nausea (6.8%) and vomiting (6.8%). The most common toxicities during SIB-IMRT were grade 3 neutropenia (24.2%) and grade 3 anemia (12.1%). Ten patients (23%) underwent a curative resection after therapy. Median overall survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent curative resection (16.8 months vs. 11 months, p < 0.01). The median cfDNA concentration was significantly lower after treatment (108.5 ng/mL vs. 18.4 ng/mL, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by concurrent SIB-IMRT was well tolerated and active.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Myung Woo
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Min Kyeong Kim
- Department of System Cancer Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jungnam Joo
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Kyong-Ah Yoon
- College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Boram Park
- Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sang-Jae Park
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sung-Sik Han
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ju Hee Lee
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Hong
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Yun-Hee Kim
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Branch, Research Institute National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Hae Moon
- Emergency Department, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Sun-Young Kong
- Department of System Cancer Science, Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea.,Department of Laboratory Medicine, Center for Diagnostic Oncology, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Tae Hyun Kim
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Woo Jin Lee
- Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
MacLaughlin CM, Ding L, Jin C, Cao P, Siddiqui I, Hwang DM, Chen J, Wilson BC, Zheng G, Hedley DW. Porphysome nanoparticles for enhanced photothermal therapy in a patient-derived orthotopic pancreas xenograft cancer model: a pilot study. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS 2016; 21:84002. [PMID: 27552306 DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.21.8.084002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2016] [Accepted: 08/02/2016] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Local disease control is a major challenge in pancreatic cancer treatment, because surgical resection of the primary tumor is only possible in a minority of patients and radiotherapy cannot be delivered in curative doses. Despite the promise of photothermal therapy (PTT) for focal ablation of pancreatic tumors, this approach remains underinvestigated. Using photothermal sensitizers in combination with laser light irradiation for PTT can result in more efficient conversion of light energy to heat and improved spatial confinement of thermal destruction to the tumor. Porphysomes are self-assembled nanoparticles composed mainly of pyropheophorbide-conjugated phospholipids, enabling the packing of ∼80,000 porphyrin photosensitizers per particle. The high-density porphyrin loading imparts enhanced photonic properties and enables high-payload tumor delivery. A patient-derived orthotopic pancreas xenograft model was used to evaluate the feasibility of porphysome-enhanced PTT for pancreatic cancer. Biodistribution and tumor accumulation were evaluated using fluorescence intensity measurements from homogenized tissues and imaging of excised organs. Tumor surface temperature was recorded using IR optical imaging during light irradiation to monitor treatment progress. Histological analyses were conducted to determine the extent of PTT thermal damage. These studies may provide insight into the influence of heat-sink effect on thermal therapy dosimetry for well-perfused pancreatic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M MacLaughlin
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadabUniversity of Toronto, Department of Medical Biophysics, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadacPrincess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - Lili Ding
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Cheng Jin
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadabUniversity of Toronto, Department of Medical Biophysics, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadadUniversity of Toronto, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - Pingjiang Cao
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Iram Siddiqui
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - David M Hwang
- University Health Network, Department of Pathology, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Juan Chen
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, Canada
| | - Brian C Wilson
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadabUniversity of Toronto, Department of Medical Biophysics, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadacPrincess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - Gang Zheng
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadabUniversity of Toronto, Department of Medical Biophysics, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadadUniversity of Toronto, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 144 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - David W Hedley
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadabUniversity of Toronto, Department of Medical Biophysics, 101 College Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1L7, CanadacPrincess Margaret Hospital, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5T 2M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|