1
|
Zhang J, Luo C, Zhang W, Yan J, Yu L, Qiu J. Individual curved-needle interstitial template created using three-dimensional printing for brachytherapy for distal parauterine tumor recurrence. Med Phys 2025; 52:596-604. [PMID: 39293487 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 08/01/2024] [Accepted: 09/04/2024] [Indexed: 09/20/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Achieving a clinically acceptable dose distribution with commercial vaginal applicators for brachytherapy of recurrent parauterine tumors is challenging. However, the application of three-dimensional (3D) printing technology in brachytherapy has been widely acknowledged and can improve clinical treatment outcomes. PURPOSE This study aimed to introduce an individual curved-needle interstitial template (ICIT) created using 3D printing technology for high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy with interstitial treatment to provide a clinically feasible approach to distal parauterine and vaginal cuff tumors. The entire workflow, including the design, optimization, and application, is presented. METHODS Ten patients with pelvic cancer recurrence were examined at our center. The vaginal topography was filled with gauze strips soaked in developer solution, and images were obtained using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Curved needle paths were designed, and ICITs were 3D-printed according to the high-risk clinical target volume (HRCTV) and vaginal filling model. The dose and volume histogram parameters of the HRCTV (V100, V200, D90, and D98) and organs at risk (OARs) (D2cc) were recorded. RESULTS All patients completed interstitial brachytherapy treatment with the 3D-printed ICIT. One patient experienced vaginal cuff tumor recurrence, and nine patients experienced parametrial tumor recurrence (four on the left and five on the right). We used two to five interstitial needles, and the maximum angle of the curved needle was 40°. No source obstruction events occurred during treatment of these 10 patients. The doses delivered to the targets and OARs of all patients were within the dose limits and based on clinical experience at our center. CONCLUSION The ICIT is a treatment option for patients with distal parauterine tumor recurrence. This method addresses the limitations of vaginal intracavitary and standard interstitial applicators. The ICIT has the advantages of biocompatibility, personalization, and magnetic resonance imaging compatibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chunli Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Wenjun Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junfang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Isohashi F, Yoshida K, Murakami N, Masui K, Ishihara S, Ohkubo Y, Kaneyasu Y, Kinoshita R, Kotsuma T, Takaoka Y, Tanaka E, Nagao A, Ogawa K, Yamazaki H. Reirradiation for recurrent gynecologic cancer using high-dose-rate brachytherapy in Japan: A multicenter survey on practice patterns and outcomes. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110269. [PMID: 38583719 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of the study is to examine the present status of reirradiation with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer in Japan and to determine the role of this therapy in clinical practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective multicenter chart review was performed for reirradiation for gynecologic cancer using HDR brachytherapy. Each center provided information on patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and complications. RESULTS The study included 165 patients treated at 9 facilities from 2000 to 2018. The analysis of outcomes included 142 patients treated with curative intent. The median follow-up time for survivors was 30 months (range 1-130 months). The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates were 53 % (95 %CI: 42-63 %), 44 % (35-53 %), and 61 % (50-70 %) for cervical cancer; 100 % (NA), 64 % (30-85 %), and 70 % (32-89 %) for endometrial cancer; and 54 % (13-83 %), 38 % (6-72 %), and 43 % (6-78 %) for vulvar and vaginal cancer, respectively. In multivariate analysis, interval to reirradiation (<1 year) was a significant risk factor for OS, PFS and LC; Gross Tumor Volume (≥25 cm3) was a significant risk factor for OS. Toxicities were analyzed in all enrolled patients (n = 165). Grade ≥ 3 late toxicities occurred in 49 patients (30 %). A higher cumulative EQD2 (α/β = 3) was significantly associated with severe complications. CONCLUSION Reirradiation with HDR brachytherapy for recurrent gynecologic cancer is effective, especially in cases with a long interval before reirradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiaki Isohashi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara, Japan.
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan
| | - Naoya Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Juntendo University, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Masui
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shunichi Ishihara
- Department of Radiology, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Toyohashi, Aichi, Japan; Department of Radiology, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Yu Ohkubo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, Saku, Nagano, Japan
| | - Yuko Kaneyasu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Fukuyama, Hiroshima, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Rumiko Kinoshita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Tadayuki Kotsuma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuji Takaoka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Department of Radiology, Saito Yukoukai Hospital, Ibaraki, Osaka, Japan
| | - Eiichi Tanaka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ayaka Nagao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tsukiji, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hardcastle N, Vasquez Osorio E, Jackson A, Mayo C, Aarberg AE, Ayadi M, Belosi F, Ceylan C, Davey A, Dupuis P, Handley JC, Hemminger T, Hoffmann L, Kelly C, Michailidou C, Muscat S, Murrell DH, Pérez-Alija J, Palmer C, Placidi L, Popovic M, Rønde HS, Selby A, Skopidou T, Solomou N, Stroom J, Thompson C, West NS, Zaila A, Appelt AL. Multi-centre evaluation of variation in cumulative dose assessment in reirradiation scenarios. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110184. [PMID: 38453055 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Safe reirradiation relies on assessment of cumulative doses to organs at risk (OARs) across multiple treatments. Different clinical pathways can result in inconsistent estimates. Here, we quantified the consistency of cumulative dose to OARs across multi-centre clinical pathways. MATERIAL AND METHODS We provided DICOM planning CT, structures and doses for two reirradiation cases: head & neck (HN) and lung. Participants followed their standard pathway to assess the cumulative physical and EQD2 doses (with provided α/β values), and submitted DVH metrics and a description of their pathways. Participants could also submit physical dose distributions from Course 1 mapped onto the CT of Course 2 using their best available tools. To assess isolated impact of image registrations, a single observer accumulated each submitted spatially mapped physical dose for every participating centre. RESULTS Cumulative dose assessment was performed by 24 participants. Pathways included rigid (n = 15), or deformable (n = 5) image registration-based 3D dose summation, visual inspection of isodose line contours (n = 1), or summation of dose metrics extracted from each course (n = 3). Largest variations were observed in near-maximum cumulative doses (25.4 - 41.8 Gy for HN, 2.4 - 33.8 Gy for lung OARs), with lower variations in volume/dose metrics to large organs. A standardised process involving spatial mapping of the first course dose to the second course CT followed by summation improved consistency for most near-maximum dose metrics in both cases. CONCLUSION Large variations highlight the uncertainty in reporting cumulative doses in reirradiation scenarios, with implications for outcome analysis and understanding of published doses. Using a standardised workflow potentially including spatially mapped doses improves consistency in determination of accumulated dose in reirradiation scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Hardcastle
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
| | | | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Myriam Ayadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Unit, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Francesca Belosi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cemile Ceylan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Oncology Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Medical Physics, University of Yeditepe, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Angela Davey
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Pauline Dupuis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Unit, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Lone Hoffmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Colin Kelly
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sarah Muscat
- Department of Medical Physics, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Donna H Murrell
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jaime Pérez-Alija
- Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catherine Palmer
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marija Popovic
- Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Heidi S Rønde
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Adam Selby
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | | | - Natasa Solomou
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Joep Stroom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | - Ali Zaila
- Biomedical Physics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yoshida A, Nakamura S, Oh RJ, Shiomi H, Yamazaki H, Yoshida K, Tanigawa N. The Dosimetric Analysis of Duodenal and Intestinal Toxicity After a Curative Dose Re-irradiation Using the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Abdominopelvic Lymph Node Lesions. Cureus 2023; 15:e50920. [PMID: 38259406 PMCID: PMC10803104 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to examine the influence of dosimetric factors on gastrointestinal toxicity after radical re-irradiation for lymph node recurrence in the abdominopelvic region using a composite plan. METHODS Between January 2008 and March 2017, 33 patients underwent radical re-irradiation for lymph node recurrence in the abdominopelvic region with a complete overlap with previous radiation therapy (RT) with the median prescription dose of the second RT of 71.7 Gy10. Re-irradiation planning protocol for target volume and organs at risk (OARs) (duodenum, small and large intestines) was decided as follows: more than equal to 97% of the prescription dose was administered to the D95 (percentage of the minimum dose that covered 95% of the target volume) of planning target volume (PTV); minimal dose to the maximally irradiated doses delivered to 1cc [D1 cc] and 5cc [D5 cc] of OARs was set below 70 Gy3 and 50 Gy3, respectively; and D1 cc and D5 cc in the cumulative plans to OARs were 120 Gy3 and 100 Gy3. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS) and univariate log-rank and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses were performed to explore predictive factors. Using dose summation of the first and re-irradiation plans, we conducted a dosimetric analysis for grade ≥ 3 toxicities of the duodenum and intestine. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 18 months, the two-year OS rate was 45.5%. The number of RT fields (localized or multiple) was a significant predisposing factor for OS rate with a hazard ratio of 0.23 (95% confidence interval 0.07-0.73). The two-year OS of the patients with a localized RT field was 63.6% and 9.1% for multiple RT fields (p= 0.00007). Four patients experienced grade ≥3 gastrointestinal toxicity related to re-irradiation (4/33=12.1%). We could not find any predisposing dosimetric value in the comparisons with and without toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The dose constraints presented in this study are relatively low rates of toxicity, which may be useful when planning re-irradiation. Especially, for the patients who could be treated with localized RT field, radical re-irradiation with a high curative dose is a good option. No dosimetric predisposing factor was found for radical re-irradiation of abdominopelvic lesions in the composite plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asami Yoshida
- Radiation Oncology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, JPN
| | | | - Ryoong-Jin Oh
- Radiation Oncology, Miyakojima Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) Clinic, Osaka, JPN
| | - Hiroya Shiomi
- Radiation Oncology, Miyakojima Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) Clinic, Osaka, JPN
| | - Hideya Yamazaki
- Radiology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, JPN
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Radiation Oncology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, JPN
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Critelli P, Pezzulla D, Lillo S, Arpa D, Scricciolo M, Di Carlo C, Argenone A, Borzillo V, Marsella AR, Tamburo M, Di Franco R, Di Marzo A, Settineri N, Mondello S, Macchia G, Belgioia L, Cerrotta A, Pontoriero A. Outcomes and toxicity in re-irradiation of gynecologic cancer: Systematic review of the Italian association of radiation and clinical oncology (AIRO). Gynecol Oncol 2023; 179:33-41. [PMID: 37913639 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study was to provide a literature review on the efficacy and safety of reirradiation(re-I) of locoregional recurrences in gynecological malignancies. METHODS A computerized literature search was performed in 4 electronic databases (1993-2020). Random-effects models and a tendency towards high heterogeneity (Cochran Q chi-square test and the I2 statistic) were used. A meta-analysis technique over single and multi-arm studies was performed to determine the pooled acute and late toxicity rate ≥ G3, locoregional control (LC), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Out of 178 articles, only 18 articles accounting for 820 patients (pts) met the inclusion criteria. Outcomes were evaluable for 522 patients. Subgroup analyses highlighted moderate to high heterogeneity among studies. BT (Brachytherapy) showed a 2y OS of 63% (95% CI, 55 to 71 p = 0,36) and 5y OS of 42% (95% CI, 35 to 50, p = 0,43) with 1y-2y-3y LC of 74 (95% CI, 62 to 75, p = 0.04)49% (95% CI, 40 to 58, p = 0.38) and 48% (95% CI, 39 to 58, p = 0,45) respectively. Chemotherapy does not improve SBRT outcomes: BT showed a G3- G4 toxicities rate was of26% (95% CI: 8-49%); studies on SBRT re-I showed a G3-G4 toxicity around of 20% if combined with CHT, and <10 when alone. CONCLUSION A large heterogeneity among studies was revealed, but showing promising results in terms of safety and feasibility. BT resulted the best kind of radiation therapy delivery in terms of clinical outcome and comparable to the SBRT technique in terms of toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Critelli
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Donato Pezzulla
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, 86100 Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Sara Lillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Donatella Arpa
- Radiotherapy Unit, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy
| | | | - Clelia Di Carlo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy
| | | | - Valentina Borzillo
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | - Rossella Di Franco
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori-IRCCS-Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | | | | - Stefania Mondello
- Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Responsible Research Hospital, 86100 Campobasso, Italy
| | - Liliana Belgioia
- Radiation Oncology Department, San Martino Teaching Hospital, Genova University (DISSAL), Genoa, Italy
| | - Annamaria Cerrotta
- Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Antonio Pontoriero
- Radiation Oncology Unit - Department of Biomedical, Dental Science and Morphological and Functional Images, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li J, Huang L, Wu H, Li J, Cao X, Liu Z. Re-irradiation for recurrent cervical cancer: A single institutional experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 43:100690. [PMID: 37876912 PMCID: PMC10590764 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 10/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Salvage treatment of recurrent cervical cancer of patients with a history of radiotherapy is currently a major clinical challenge. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively analyze clinical outcomes of radiation in patients with recurrent cancer who have previously received radiotherapy at our hospital and further explore the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent re-irradiation were included in our department between January 2015 and December 2017. All the patients received Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) alone or VMAT followed by three dimensional-image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT). The volume and dose for re-irradiation depended on previous radiation fields, dosimetry and recurrence sites. All patients received systemic chemotherapy before or after re-irradiation. Results Fifty patients were included in our study. The median time from primary radiotherapy to re-irradiation was 12 months. Local recurrence, which was the most common failure following primary treatment, was present in 25 patients (50.0 %) while regional recurrence, loco-regional recurrence and distant recurrence combined in-filed recurrence was present in 8 (16.0 %), 9 (18.0 %) and 8 patients (16.0 %). Re-irradiation dose to lymph nodes was 45 Gy with or without a boost up to 55-60 Gy, and to the gross mass was 36-45 Gy with or without a boost up to 45-61 Gy. The median follow-up period was 22 (range,4-59) months. The 3-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were 58.0, 38.7, and 44.4 %, respectively. The median time of PFS and OS was 14 and 26 months, respectively. The interval between two successive radiotherapies beyond 12 months was significantly associated with better LC and PFS (p ≤ 0.05), but without the benefit of OS (p > 0.05). Serum SCC antigen level less than 1.5 ng/ml had a significantly better impact on PFS (p ≤ 0.05). Overall, 14 patients (28 %) experienced ≥ grade 3 acute toxicities, while 9 (18 %) experienced ≥ grade 3 late toxicities. Conclusions Re-irradiation with VMAT is an effective and safe salvage treatment option with a reasonably good clinical outcome and toxicity profile in selected patients. In our experience, recurrent cancer patients with an interval between two successive radiotherapy courses beyond 12 months and with a serum SCC-Ag level less than 1.5 ng/ml, had improved outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junyun Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Lin Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Haiying Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Jia Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Xinping Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| | - Zhimin Liu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Murray LJ, Appelt AL, Ajithkumar T, Bedford JL, Burnet NG, Lalondrelle S, Manolopoulos S, O'Cathail SM, Robinson M, Short SC, Slevin F, Thomson DJ. Re-irradiation: From Cell Lines to Patients, Filling the (Science) Gap in the Market. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2023; 35:318-322. [PMID: 36842937 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L J Murray
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
| | - A L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - T Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - J L Bedford
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N G Burnet
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - S Lalondrelle
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - S Manolopoulos
- Northern Centre for Cancer Care, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, UK
| | - S M O'Cathail
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK
| | - M Robinson
- Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, UK; Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - S C Short
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - F Slevin
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - D J Thomson
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dose Accumulation for Multicourse Gynaecological Reirradiation: A Methodological Narrative and Clinical Examples. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 113:1085-1090. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
9
|
Beddok A, Calugaru V, de Marzi L, Graff P, Dumas JL, Goudjil F, Dendale R, Minsat M, Verrelle P, Buvat I, Créhange G. Clinical and technical challenges of cancer reirradiation: Words of wisdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 174:103655. [PMID: 35398521 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the development of new radiotherapy techniques that have improved healthy tissue sparing, reirradiation (reRT) has become possible. The selection of patients eligible for reRT is complex given that it can induce severe or even fatal side effects. The first step should therefore be to assess, in the context of multidisciplinary staff meeting, the patient's physical status, the presence of sequelae resulting from the first irradiation and the best treatment option available. ReRT can be performed either curatively or palliatively to treat a cancer-related symptom that is detrimental to the patient's quality of life. The selected techniques for reRT should provide the best protection of healthy tissue. The construction of target volumes and the evaluation of constraints regarding the doses that can be used in this context have not yet been fully codified. These points raised in the literature suggest that randomized studies should be undertaken to answer pending questions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnaud Beddok
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France.
| | - Valentin Calugaru
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Graff
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Jean-Luc Dumas
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| | - Mathieu Minsat
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France
| | - Irène Buvat
- Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Paris - Saint Cloud-Orsay. France; Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), U1288 Université Paris Saclay/Inserm/Institut Curie. Orsay. France; Proton Therapy Center. Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay. France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chuong MD, Bryant JM, Herrera R, McCulloch J, Contreras J, Kotecha R, Romaguera T, Alvarez D, Hall MD, Rubens M, Mehta MP, Kaiser A, Tom M, Gutierrez AN, Mittauer KE. Dose-Escalated Magnetic Resonance Image–Guided Abdominopelvic Reirradiation With Continuous Intrafraction Visualization, Soft Tissue Tracking, and Automatic Beam Gating. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100840. [PMID: 35146215 PMCID: PMC8802055 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods and Materials Results Conclusions
Collapse
|
11
|
Barcellini A, Dominoni M, Dal Mas F, Biancuzzi H, Venturini SC, Gardella B, Orlandi E, Bø K. Sexual Health Dysfunction After Radiotherapy for Gynecological Cancer: Role of Physical Rehabilitation Including Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:813352. [PMID: 35186978 PMCID: PMC8852813 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.813352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The present study aims to describe: 1. How the side effects of radiotherapy (RT) could impact sexual health in women; 2. The effectiveness of physical rehabilitation including pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the management of sexual dysfunction after RT. Materials and Methods Search keys on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro, and Cochrane were used to identify studies on women treated with radical or adjuvant RT and/or brachytherapy for gynecological cancers with an emphasis on vulvo-vaginal toxicities and PFMT studies on sexual dysfunction for this group of women. Results Regarding the first key question, we analyzed 19 studies including a total of 2,739 women who reported vaginal dryness, stenosis, and pain as the most common side effects. Reports of dosimetric risk factors and dose-effect data for vaginal and vulvar post-RT toxicities are scant. Only five studies, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were found to report the effect of PFMT alone or in combination with other treatments. The results showed some evidence for the effect of training modalities including PFMT, but to date, there is insufficient evidence from high-quality studies to draw any conclusion of a possible effect. Conclusions Gynecological toxicities after RT are common, and their management is challenging. The few data available for a rehabilitative approach on post-actinic vulvo-vaginal side effects are encouraging. Large and well-designed RCTs with the long-term follow-up that investigate the effect of PFMT on vulvo-vaginal tissues and pelvic floor muscle function are needed to provide further guidance for clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
- *Correspondence: Amelia Barcellini
| | - Mattia Dominoni
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
- Center of Organization and Governance of the Public Administration, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Helena Biancuzzi
- Ipazia, International Observatory on Gender Research, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Gardella
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Kari Bø
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Qin X, Zhang F, Hou X, Yu L, Yu L, Yan J, Qiu J. Efficacy and safety of a 3D-printed applicator for vaginal brachytherapy in patients with central pelvic-recurrent cervical cancer after primary hysterectomy. Brachytherapy 2021; 21:193-201. [PMID: 34980568 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy is an integral component of the management of patients with central pelvic-recurrent cervical cancer after primary hysterectomy, and is typically delivered using conventional applicators. We investigated the efficacy and safety of three-dimensional (3D)-printed, customizable applicators for those patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-six patients were treated with combination external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Patients with lesions ≤1 and >1 cm before brachytherapy were treated with intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy, respectively. Dosimetric plans were compared between the vaginal cylinder and 3D-printed applicator for the first 9 patients. Outcomes and treatment-related complications were also investigated. RESULTS The median tumor size before brachytherapy was 0.81 cm. Intracavitary, interstitial, and combined interstitial-intracavitary brachytherapy were performed in 22 (85%), 3 (11%), and 1 (4%) of the patients, respectively. The clinical target volume (CTV) coverage goal was achieved with all 3D-printed plans but failed with three single-channel cylinder plans (33.3%). Owing to 3D-printed transvaginal applicator guidance, there was no need to adjust the needle position after implantation. The mean CTV dose for all patients was 71 ± 8.2 Gy; all met the dose constraints to the organs at risk, but 1 (4%) had a rectal D2cc overdose. The 2-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 87.8%, 71.0%, and 91.6%, respectively. Four patients (21%) developed early grade 3-4 hematological toxicities and 1 (4%) developed a late grade 3 adverse event. CONCLUSIONS High-quality intracavitary and/or interstitial brachytherapy can be achieved using a 3D-printed applicator and yields favorable outcomes with acceptable toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lang Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lihua Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Junfang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| | - Jie Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yan J, Zheng Z, Zhu J, Hu K, Hou X, Shen J, Lian X, Sun S, Miao Z, Shen J, Guan H, Meng Q, Zhang F. Radiotherapy for Vaginal Recurrences of Cervical Cancer in Patients After Prior Surgery: Analysis of Effect and Prognostic Factors. Front Oncol 2021; 11:744871. [PMID: 34589438 PMCID: PMC8475272 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.744871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of salvage radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment for vaginal recurrence of cervical cancer in patients after prior surgery remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of salvage RT and explore prognostic factors associated with the survival after recurrence. Methods Patients with cervical cancer, treated for vaginal recurrences at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between July 2011 and November 2019, were identified. All the patients underwent prior surgery for primary tumor and received salvage RT including external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), or both. The irradiation field and dose depended on the conditions of patients. Recurrence patterns were classified into four categories according to the site of recurrence. Prognostic factors on the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) were analyzed, and late toxicity was evaluated. Results A total of 141 patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up time of 40.8 months. The estimated 5-year OS, PFS, and LC rates were 81%, 75%, and 87%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, endovaginal recurrence and no irradiation history were favorable prognostic factors associated with OS (all p < 0.05), PFS (all p < 0.05), and LC (all p < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of the recurrence pattern is larger than the stage of primary tumor (0.734 vs. 0.670). Conclusions RT was an effective treatment with tolerable toxicity for vaginal recurrences of cervical cancer in patients with prior surgery. Recurrence pattern and irradiation history were important prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junfang Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ziye Zheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiawei Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaorong Hou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shuai Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zheng Miao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Shen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Qingyu Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fuquan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Barcellini A, Ditto A, Mirandola A, Roccio M, Imparato S, Raspagliesi F, Orlandi E. Is a tailored strategy using proton beam radiotherapy for reirradiation advantageous for elderly women? A case report. TUMORI JOURNAL 2021; 107:NP67-NP72. [PMID: 33896256 DOI: 10.1177/03008916211007930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of primary or recurrent vaginal tumours in an aging population is challenging for gynecologic and radiation oncologists. In patients unsuited for surgery and already irradiated on the pelvis, proton beam radiotherapy may be worthwhile due to its ballistic advantages. CASE REPORT We report the case of an 80-year-old woman with a squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina after a history of pelvic radiation and vaginal brachytherapy delivered for a previous endometrial adenocarcinoma. She received proton beam radiotherapy with a complete response after 12 months and mild toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The complexity of reirradiation management in the frail and elderly population requires attention. Efforts should be focused on maintaining autonomy and quality of life in order to improve adherence and clinical compliance to the treatment. In the era of the tailored approach, hadrontherapy can play an important role to minimize toxicity, obtain good local control, and reduce the overall treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Antonino Ditto
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS National Cancer Institute Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Medical Physics, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Marianna Roccio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation and University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Sara Imparato
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Salvage Reirradiation: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061226. [PMID: 33799617 PMCID: PMC7999189 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Local recurrence in gynecological malignancies occurring in a previously irradiated field is a difficult clinical issue. Curative-intent treatment is salvage surgery and is associated with non-negligible peri-operative morbidity and has a substantial impact on long-term quality of life. Reirradiation, using three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT), might be a suitable alternative, especially in non-operable patients. The aim of this review is to report outcomes and toxicities of reirradiation 3D-IGBT in this context. 3D-IGBT appears to be a feasible alternative to salvage surgery in inoperable patients, with an acceptable outcome for patients who have no other curative therapeutic options, however long-term toxicities were high in some studies. Each case should be referred to highly experienced expert centers. Abstract Background: Local recurrence in gynecological malignancies occurring in a previously irradiated field is a challenging clinical issue. The most frequent curative-intent treatment is salvage surgery. Reirradiation, using three-dimensional image-guided brachytherapy (3D-IGBT), might be a suitable alternative. We reviewed recent literature concerning 3D-IGBT for reirradiation in the context of local recurrences from gynecological malignancies. Methods: We conducted a large-scale literature research, and 15 original studies, responding to our research criteria, were finally selected. Results: Local control rates ranged from 44% to 71.4% at 2–5 years, and overall survival rates ranged from 39.5% to 78% at 2–5 years. Grade ≥3 toxicities ranged from 1.7% to 50%, with only one study reporting a grade 5 event. Results in terms of outcome and toxicities were highly variable depending on studies. Several studies suggested that local control could be improved with 2 Gy equivalent doses >40 Gy. Conclusion: IGBT appears to be a feasible alternative to salvage surgery in inoperable patients or patients refusing surgery, with an acceptable outcome for patients who have no other curative therapeutic options, however at a high cost of long-term grade ≥3 toxicities in some studies. We recommend that patients with local recurrence from gynecologic neoplasm occurring in previously irradiated fields should be referred to highly experienced expert centers. Centralization of data and large-scale multicentric international prospective trials are warranted. Efforts should be made to improve local control while limiting the risk of toxicities.
Collapse
|
16
|
Yamazaki H, Suzuki G, Aibe N, Nakamura S, Yoshida K, Oh R. A surveillance study of patterns of reirradiation practice using external beam radiotherapy in Japan. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:285-293. [PMID: 33341887 PMCID: PMC7948832 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rraa112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to survey the present status and patterns of reirradiation (Re-RT) practice using external beam radiotherapy in Japan. We distributed an e-mail questionnaire to the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology partner institutions, which consisted of part 1 (number of Re-RT cases in 2008-2012 and 2013-2018) and part 2 (indications and treatment planning for Re-RT and eight case scenarios). Of the 85 institutions that replied to part 1, 75 (88%) performed Re-RTs. However, 59 of these 75 institutions (79%) reported difficulty in obtaining Re-RT case information from their databases. The responses from 37 institutions included the number of Re-RT cases, which totaled 508 in the period from 2009 to 2013 (institution median 3; 0-235), and an increase to 762 cases in the period from 2014 to 2018 (12.5; 0-295). A total of 47 physicians responded to part 2 of the survey. Important indications for Re-RT that were considered were age, performance status, life expectancy, absence of distant metastases and time interval since previous radiotherapy. In addition to clinical decision-making factors, previous total radiation dose, volume of irradiated tissue and the biologically equivalent dose were considered during Re-RT planning. From the eight site-specific scenarios presented to the respondents, >60% of radiation oncologists agreed to perform Re-RT. Re-RT cases have increased in number, and interest in Re-RT among radiation oncologists has increased recently due to advances in technology. However, several problems exist that emphasize the need for consensus building and the establishment of guidelines for practice and prospective evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideya Yamazaki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Gen Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajiicho Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto 602-8566 Japan
| | - Satoaki Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata 573-1010, Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata 573-1010, Japan
| | - Ryoongjin Oh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miyakojima IGRT Clinic
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Chapman CH, Cunha AJ, Littell RD, Chen LM, Hsu IC. High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy for vaginal endometrial cancer recurrence after prior surgery and radiotherapy. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:536-542. [PMID: 33549517 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Characterize the clinical outcomes of endometrial cancer vaginal recurrences after previous surgery and radiation therapy treated with reirradiation including image-guided interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS A single-institution retrospective study identifying women receiving reirradiation for vaginal recurrence of endometrial cancer between 2004 and 2017. RESULTS Twenty-three women had vaginal recurrences of endometrial cancer, median 13.7 months (range 3.5-104.9) from initial radiation. All received reirradiation with interstitial HDR brachytherapy, and seven also received external beam radiation. Median reirradiation EQD2_10 was 48 Gy (range 24.0-68.81), and median cumulative EQD2_10 was 106.25 Gy (range 62.26-122.0). Median follow-up after reirradiation was 40.2 months (range 4.5-112.7). At 3 years, overall survival was 56%, cancer-specific survival was 61%, and disease-free survival was 46%. 14 patients experienced disease recurrence; 10 including distant sites, one at a regional node only. Three patients experienced local recurrences, two of whom did not complete the prescribed course of reirradiation. The overall crude local control rate was 87%. Three patients experienced Grade 3 vaginal toxicity. There was no bladder or rectal toxicity with Grade >2. CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation including interstitial HDR brachytherapy is a promising option for vaginal recurrences of endometrial cancer after prior radiation, with high rate of local control and acceptable toxicity. However, distant failure is common. Further studies are needed to determine cumulative radiation dose limits and the role of systemic therapy in this scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Adam J Cunha
- Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco CA
| | - Ramey D Littell
- Gynecologic Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, San Francisco CA
| | | | - I-Chow Hsu
- Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco CA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
A national surveillance study of the current status of reirradiation using brachytherapy in Japan. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:226-231. [PMID: 32888854 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to explore the current status and pattern of practice for reirradiation using brachytherapy (ReRT-BT) through a survey in Japan. MATERIALS AND METHODS We distributed an e-mail-based questionnaire to 153 institutions equipped with high-dose-rate brachytherapy facilities. RESULTS We received responses from 76 institutions (49.7%). Forty-three of these institutions performed ReRT-BT and 42 institutions (55%) performed ReRT-BT during 2009-2018. However, 29 of the 42 institutions (69%) reported difficulty in obtaining ReRT-BT case information from their respective databases. Almost all the institutions encountered insufficient database system to extract details about the ReRT-BT cases. Responses from 33 institutions included the number of ReRT-BT cases; this increased from 90 in the period 2009-2013 (institution median = 0.5; 0-16) to 172 in the period 2014-2018 (institution median = 2; 0-26). Nine institutions had to perform ReRT-BT for more than one case per year. The major location for cancer treatment was the pelvis (94%), followed by the head and neck (5%) and others (1%). In six site-specific scenarios, barring uterine corpus cancer recurrence, more than 90% of radiation oncologists agreed to perform ReRT-BT, whereas other areas (head and neck, prostate, and rectal cancer) gained 16-37% agreement. CONCLUSIONS This decade saw an increase in the number of ReRT-BT cases in Japan and radiation oncologists' interest in ReRT-BT as a viable therapeutic option. However, scarce availability, immature education system, and insufficient database system are barriers to further consensus building.
Collapse
|
19
|
Sturdza A, Viswanathan AN, Erickson B, Yashar C, Bruggeman A, Feddock J, Klopp A, Beriwal S, Gaffney D, Han K, Kamrava M. American Brachytherapy Society working group report on the patterns of care and a literature review of reirradiation for gynecologic cancers. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:127-138. [PMID: 31917178 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2019.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2019] [Revised: 11/22/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Recurrences of previously irradiated gynecological malignancies are uncommon. Standardized management of these cases is not well established. We aim to provide an in-depth literature review and present current practice patterns among an international group of experienced practitioners in the reirradiation setting of gynecologic cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS An extensive literature search was performed and 35 articles were selected based on preset criteria. A 20-question online survey of 10 experts regarding their retreatment practices was also conducted. RESULTS The reviewed publications include a diverse group of patients, multiple treatment techniques, a range of total doses, local control, overall survival, and toxicity outcomes. Overall, local control ranged from 44% to 88% over 1-5 years with OS in the range of 39.5-82% at 2-5 years. Late G3-4 toxicity varied very broadly from 0% to 42.9%, with most papers reporting serious toxicities greater than 15%. The most common reirradiation technique utilized was brachytherapy. Some low-dose-rate data suggest improved outcomes with doses >50 Gy. The high-dose-rate data are more varied with some studies suggesting improved local control with doses >40 Gy. In general, a longer time interval between the first and second course of radiation as well as recurrences <2-4 cm tend to have improved outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Reirradiation with brachytherapy results in relatively reasonable local control and toxicities for women with recurrent gynecologic cancers. The appropriate dose for each case needs to be individualized given the heterogeneity of cases. Multidisciplinary management is critical to develop individualized plans and to clearly communicate potential side effects and expected treatment outcomes. TAKE HOME MESSAGE Reirradiation with brachytherapy is an acceptable effective organ preserving approach for recurrent gynecologic cancers with a reasonable local control and toxicity profile. Each case requires multidisciplinary management to develop an individualized approach. Monitoring for potential long-term toxicities is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Radiation Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna, Austria.
| | - Akila N Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Beth Erickson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin
| | - Catheryn Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego
| | - Andrew Bruggeman
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego
| | | | - Ann Klopp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Sushil Beriwal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UPMC Hillman cancer center
| | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah
| | - Kathy Han
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nieder C. Second re-irradiation: A delicate balance between safety and efficacy. Phys Med 2019; 58:155-158. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
21
|
Cree A, Livsey J, Barraclough L, Dubec M, Hambrock T, Van Herk M, Choudhury A, McWilliam A. The Potential Value of MRI in External-Beam Radiotherapy for Cervical Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:737-750. [PMID: 30209010 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2018] [Revised: 08/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
The reference standard treatment for cervical cancer is concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided brachytherapy. Improvements in brachytherapy have increased local control rates, but late toxicity remains high with rates of 11% grade ≥3. The primary clinical target volume (CTV) for external-beam radiotherapy includes the cervix and uterus, which can show significant inter-fraction motion. This means that generous margins are required to cover the primary CTV, increasing the radiation dose to organs at risk and, therefore, toxicity. A number of image-guided radiotherapy techniques (IGRT) have been developed, but motion can be random and difficult to predict prior to treatment. In light of the development of integrated MRI linear accelerators, this review discusses the potential value of MRI in external-beam radiotherapy. Current solutions for managing pelvic organ motion are reviewed, including the potential for online adaptive radiotherapy. The impacts of the use of MRI in tumour delineation and in the delivery of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) are highlighted. The potential role and challenges of using multi parametric MRI to guide radiotherapy are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Cree
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Christie Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - J Livsey
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - L Barraclough
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - M Dubec
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - T Hambrock
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - M Van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Christie Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Christie Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - A McWilliam
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust Christie Hospital, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Muirhead R, Jones B. Re-irradiation is Now a Real Option – But How Do We Take it Forward? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2018; 30:65-66. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|