1
|
Hardcastle N, Vasquez Osorio E, Jackson A, Mayo C, Aarberg AE, Ayadi M, Belosi F, Ceylan C, Davey A, Dupuis P, Handley JC, Hemminger T, Hoffmann L, Kelly C, Michailidou C, Muscat S, Murrell DH, Pérez-Alija J, Palmer C, Placidi L, Popovic M, Rønde HS, Selby A, Skopidou T, Solomou N, Stroom J, Thompson C, West NS, Zaila A, Appelt AL. Multi-centre evaluation of variation in cumulative dose assessment in reirradiation scenarios. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110184. [PMID: 38453055 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Revised: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Safe reirradiation relies on assessment of cumulative doses to organs at risk (OARs) across multiple treatments. Different clinical pathways can result in inconsistent estimates. Here, we quantified the consistency of cumulative dose to OARs across multi-centre clinical pathways. MATERIAL AND METHODS We provided DICOM planning CT, structures and doses for two reirradiation cases: head & neck (HN) and lung. Participants followed their standard pathway to assess the cumulative physical and EQD2 doses (with provided α/β values), and submitted DVH metrics and a description of their pathways. Participants could also submit physical dose distributions from Course 1 mapped onto the CT of Course 2 using their best available tools. To assess isolated impact of image registrations, a single observer accumulated each submitted spatially mapped physical dose for every participating centre. RESULTS Cumulative dose assessment was performed by 24 participants. Pathways included rigid (n = 15), or deformable (n = 5) image registration-based 3D dose summation, visual inspection of isodose line contours (n = 1), or summation of dose metrics extracted from each course (n = 3). Largest variations were observed in near-maximum cumulative doses (25.4 - 41.8 Gy for HN, 2.4 - 33.8 Gy for lung OARs), with lower variations in volume/dose metrics to large organs. A standardised process involving spatial mapping of the first course dose to the second course CT followed by summation improved consistency for most near-maximum dose metrics in both cases. CONCLUSION Large variations highlight the uncertainty in reporting cumulative doses in reirradiation scenarios, with implications for outcome analysis and understanding of published doses. Using a standardised workflow potentially including spatially mapped doses improves consistency in determination of accumulated dose in reirradiation scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Hardcastle
- Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; The Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
| | | | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles Mayo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Myriam Ayadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Unit, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - Francesca Belosi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Cemile Ceylan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istanbul Oncology Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Medical Physics, University of Yeditepe, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Angela Davey
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Pauline Dupuis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Unit, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | | | | | - Lone Hoffmann
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Colin Kelly
- St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - Sarah Muscat
- Department of Medical Physics, Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Donna H Murrell
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jaime Pérez-Alija
- Servei de Radiofísica i Radioprotecció, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Catherine Palmer
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Lorenzo Placidi
- Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marija Popovic
- Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Heidi S Rønde
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Adam Selby
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Swansea, Wales, UK
| | | | - Natasa Solomou
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Joep Stroom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | | | - Ali Zaila
- Biomedical Physics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Xiong Y, Rabe M, Rippke C, Kawula M, Nierer L, Klüter S, Belka C, Niyazi M, Hörner-Rieber J, Corradini S, Landry G, Kurz C. Impact of daily plan adaptation on accumulated doses in ultra-hypofractionated magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy of prostate cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100562. [PMID: 38463219 PMCID: PMC10924058 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 01/18/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Ultra-hypofractionated online adaptive magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is promising for prostate cancer. However, the impact of online adaptation on target coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing at the level of accumulated dose has not yet been reported. Using deformable image registration (DIR)-based accumulation, we compared the delivered adapted dose with the simulated non-adapted dose. Materials and methods Twenty-three prostate cancer patients treated at two clinics with 0.35 T magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator (MR-linac) following the same treatment protocol (5 × 7.5 Gy with urethral sparing and daily adaptation) were included. The fraction MR images were deformably registered to the planning MR image. Both non-adapted and adapted fraction doses were accumulated with the corresponding vector fields. Two DIR approaches were implemented. PTV* (planning target volume minus urethra+2mm) D95%, CTV* (clinical target volume minus urethra) D98%, and OARs (urethra+2mm, bladder, and rectum) D0.2cc, were evaluated. Statistical significance was inferred from a two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p < 0.05). Results Normalized to the baseline, the accumulated PTV* D95% increased significantly by 2.7 % ([1.5, 4.3]%) through adaptation, and the CTV* D98% by 1.2 % ([0.1, 1.7]%). For the OARs after adaptation, accumulated bladder D0.2cc decreased by 0.4 % ([-1.2, 0.4]%), urethra+2mmD0.2cc by 0.8 % ([-1.6, -0.1]%), while rectum D0.2cc increased by 2.6 % ([1.2, 4.9]%). For all patients, rectum D0.2cc was still below the clinical constraint. Results of both DIR approaches differed on average by less than 0.2 %. Conclusions Online adaptation in MRgRT improved target coverage and OARs sparing at the level of accumulated dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqing Xiong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Moritz Rabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Kawula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Lukas Nierer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Claus Belka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner site Munich, a Partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu X, Amstutz F, Weber DC, Unkelbach J, Lomax AJ, Zhang Y. Patient-specific quality assurance for deformable IMRT/IMPT dose accumulation: Proposition and validation of energy conservation based validation criterion. Med Phys 2023; 50:7130-7138. [PMID: 37345380 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deformable image registration (DIR)-based dose accumulation (DDA) is regularly used in adaptive radiotherapy research. However, the applicability and reliability of DDA for direct clinical usage are still being debated. One primary concern is the validity of DDA, particularly for scenarios with substantial anatomical changes, for which energy-conservation problems were observed in conceptual studies. PURPOSE We present and validate an energy-conservation (EC)-based DDA validation workflow and further investigate its usefulness for actual patient data, specifically for lung cancer cases. METHODS For five non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, DDA based on five selective DIR methods were calculated for five different treatment plans, which include one intensity-modulated photon therapy (IMRT), two intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), and two combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT) plans. All plans were optimized on the planning CT (planCT) acquired in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and were re-optimized on the repeated DIBH CTs of three later fractions. The resulting fractional doses were warped back to the planCT using each DIR. An EC-based validation of the accumulation process was implemented and applied to all DDA results. Correlations between relative organ mass/volume variations and the extent of EC violation were then studied using Bayesian linear regression (BLR). RESULTS For most OARs, EC violation within 10% is observed. However, for the PTVs and GTVs with substantial regression, severe overestimation of the fractional energy was found regardless of treatment type and applied DIR method. BLR results show that EC violation is linearly correlated to the relative mass variation (R^2 > 0.95) and volume variation (R^2 > 0.60). CONCLUSION DDA results should be used with caution in regions with high mass/volume variation for intensity-based DIRs. EC-based validation is a useful approach to provide patient-specific quality assurance of the validity of DDA in radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wu
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Department of Information Technology & Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Florian Amstutz
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Antony J Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Regnery S, Leiner L, Buchele C, Hoegen P, Sandrini E, Held T, Deng M, Eichkorn T, Rippke C, Renkamp CK, König L, Lang K, Adeberg S, Debus J, Klüter S, Hörner-Rieber J. Comparison of different dose accumulation strategies to estimate organ doses after stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:92. [PMID: 37248504 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02284-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Re-irradiation is frequently performed in the era of precision oncology, but previous doses to organs-at-risk (OAR) must be assessed to avoid cumulative overdoses. Stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (SMART) enables highly precise ablation of tumors close to OAR. However, OAR doses may change considerably during adaptive treatment, which complicates potential re-irradiation. We aimed to compare the baseline plan with different dose accumulation techniques to inform re-irradiation. PATIENTS & METHODS We analyzed 18 patients who received SMART to lung or liver tumors inside prospective databases. Cumulative doses were calculated inside the planning target volumes (PTV) and OAR for the adapted plans and theoretical non-adapted plans via (1) cumulative dose volume histograms (DVH sum plan) and (2) deformable image registration (DIR)-based dose accumulation to planning images (DIR sum plan). We compared cumulative dose parameters between the baseline plan, DVH sum plan and DIR sum plan using equivalent doses in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2). RESULTS Individual patients presented relevant increases of near-maximum doses inside the proximal bronchial tree, spinal cord, heart and gastrointestinal OAR when comparing adaptive treatment to the baseline plans. The spinal cord near-maximum doses were significantly increased in the liver patients (D2% median: baseline 6.1 Gy, DIR sum 8.1 Gy, DVH sum 8.4 Gy, p = 0.04; D0.1 cm³ median: baseline 6.1 Gy, DIR sum 8.1 Gy, DVH sum 8.5 Gy, p = 0.04). Three OAR overdoses occurred during adaptive treatment (DIR sum: 1, DVH sum: 2), and four more intense OAR overdoses would have occurred during non-adaptive treatment (DIR sum: 4, DVH sum: 3). Adaptive treatment maintained similar PTV coverages to the baseline plans, while non-adaptive treatment yielded significantly worse PTV coverages in the lung (D95% median: baseline 86.4 Gy, DIR sum 82.4 Gy, DVH sum 82.2 Gy, p = 0.006) and liver patients (D95% median: baseline 87.4 Gy, DIR sum 82.1 Gy, DVH sum 81.1 Gy, p = 0.04). CONCLUSION OAR doses can increase during SMART, so that re-irradiation should be planned based on dose accumulations of the adapted plans instead of the baseline plan. Cumulative dose volume histograms represent a simple and conservative dose accumulation strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Leiner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Buchele
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Philipp Hoegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elisabetta Sandrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carolin Rippke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Katharina Renkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Klüter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bindal A, Mittal P, Shinghal A, Scaria L, Prajapati K, Swamidas J, Gurram L, Berger D, Sturdza A, Chopra S. Sigmoid dose accumulation and reporting for multifractionated brachytherapy for cervical cancer: Methodological development of sigmoid points through virtual endoscopic method. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:325-333. [PMID: 36882345 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The sigmoid is an important organ at risk for gynecological brachytherapy (BT). However, the reliability of localization of high-dose regions during multi-fractionated treatment is limited. This work reports the methodological development of sigmoid points to summate multi-fractionated doses. METHODS AND MATERIAL Ten paired MRI data sets of ring-based intracavitary brachytherapy were obtained. Simulating a virtual endoscope, a reference line was created along the central axis of the anorectosigmoid for each implant. A trendline was generated, and linear dose was determined. Three-dimensional (3D) coordinates of high-dose regions were identified, and overlap was determined. In the next step, 3D coordinates of high-dose sigmoid points were localized in reference to cervical os and re-verified for location in reference to sigmoid lumen and corroboration with 2cc doses. With minor modifications, sigmoid points were proposed. RESULTS In 6 of 10 patients, high-dose regions co-localized in subsequent fractions of BT. Three high-dose regions were identified along the sigmoid length and proposed as sigmoid points in reference to cervical os. (S1'= 0.5 cm right, 1.5 cm posterior, and 2.4 cm cranial; S2' = 0.3 cm anterior and 4.5 cm cranial; S3' = 2.7 cm left, 3 cm anterior, and 3.6 cm cranial to the cervical os). S1' and S2' were located in the sigmoid in 70% and 60% of data sets. The mean difference between D2cc and S1'/S2' was 0.30 Gy and 1.06 Gy respectively. S3' had limited corroboration to sigmoid lumen or 2 cc doses. The points S1' and S2' were further modified (minor) for applicability and proposed as sigmoid points 1 and 2 (SP1 0.5 right,1.5 posterior and 2.5 cm cranial to cervical os and SP2 (0.5 cm anterior and 4.5 cm cranial to cervical os)). CONCLUSION SP1 and SP 2 are proposed as a surrogate for 2 cc sigmoid doses and may provide a method of reliable inter-fraction dose summation. This pilot work requires further validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arpita Bindal
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Prachi Mittal
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Abhishek Shinghal
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Libin Scaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kunal Prajapati
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jamema Swamidas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Lavanya Gurram
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Daniel Berger
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Alina Sturdza
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen J, Bissonnette JP, Craig T, Munoz-Schuffenegger P, Tadic T, Dawson LA, Velec M. Liver SBRT dose accumulation to assess the impact of anatomic variations on normal tissue doses and toxicity in patients treated with concurrent sorafenib. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109588. [PMID: 36858203 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Unexpected liver volume reductions occurred during trials of liver SBRT and concurrent sorafenib. The aims were to accumulate liver SBRT doses to assess the impact of these anatomic variations on normal tissue dose parameters and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Thirty-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or metastases treated on trials of liver SBRT (30-57 Gy, 6 fractions) and concurrent sorafenib were analyzed. SBRT doses were accumulated using biomechanical deformable registration of daily cone-beam CT. Dose deviations (accumulated-planned) for normal tissues were compared for patients with liver volume reductions > 100 cc versus stable volumes, and accumulated doses were reported for three patients with grade 3-5 luminal gastrointestinal toxicities. RESULTS Patients with reduced (N = 12) liver volumes had larger mean deviations of 0.4-1.3 Gy in normal tissues, versus -0.2-0.4 Gy for stable cases (N = 20), P > 0.05. Deviations > 5% of the prescribed dose occurred in both groups. Two HCC patients with toxicities to small and large bowel had liver volume reductions and deviations to the maximum dose of 4% (accumulated 36.9 Gy) and 3% (accumulated 33.4 Gy) to these organs respectively. Another HCC patient with a toxicity of unknown location plus tumor rupture, had stable liver volumes and deviations to luminal organs of -6% to 4.5% (accumulated < 30.5 Gy). CONCLUSION Liver volume reductions during SBRT and concurrent sorafenib were associated with larger increases in accumulated dose to normal tissues versus stable liver volumes. These dosimetric changes may have further contributed to toxicities in HCC patients who have higher baseline risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmine Chen
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Jean-Pierre Bissonnette
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Techna Insitute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tim Craig
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Pablo Munoz-Schuffenegger
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Tony Tadic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Velec
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Techna Insitute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bleeker M, Visser J, Goudschaal K, Bel A, Hulshof MCCM, Sonke JJ, van der Horst A. Dosimetric benefit of a library of plans versus single-plan strategy for pre-operative gastric cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109582. [PMID: 36842661 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The stomach experiences large volume and shape changes during pre-operative gastric radiotherapy. This study evaluates the dosimetric benefit for organs-at-risk (OARs) of a library of plans (LoP) compared to the traditional single-plan (SP) strategy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twelve patients who received SP CBCT-guided pre-operative gastric radiotherapy (45 Gy; 25 fractions) were included. Clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of CTVstomach (i.e., stomach + 10 mm uniform margin minus OARs) and CTVLN (i.e., regional lymph node stations). For LoP, five stomach volumes (approximately equidistant with fixed volumes) were created using a previously developed stomach deformation model (volume = 150-750 mL). Appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated for CTVstomach (SP and LoP, separately) and CTVLN. Treatment plans were automatically generated/optimized and the best-fitting library plan was manually selected for each daily CBCT. OARs (i.e., liver, kidneys, heart, spleen, spinal canal) doses were accumulated and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters were evaluated. RESULTS The non-isotropic PTVstomach margins were significantly (p < 0.05) smaller for LoP than SP (median = 13.1 vs 19.8 mm). For each patient, the average PTV was smaller using a LoP (difference range 134-1151 mL). For all OARs except the kidneys, DVH parameters were significantly reduced using a LoP. Differences in mean dose (Dmean) for liver, heart and spleen ranged between -1.8 to 5.7 Gy. For LoP, a benefit of heart Dmean > 4 Gy and spleen Dmean > 2 Gy was found in 4 and 5 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION A LoP strategy for pre-operative gastric cancer reduced average PTV and reduced OAR dose compared to a SP strategy, thereby potentially reducing risks for radiation-induced toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot Bleeker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jorrit Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin Goudschaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arjan Bel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten C C M Hulshof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid van der Horst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Visser S, Korevaar EW, Muijs CT, Wijsman R, Langendijk JA, Pisciotta P, Gutteres Marmitt G, O Ribeiro C, Both S. Clinical 3D/4D cumulative proton dose assessment methods for thoracic tumours with large motion. Radiother Oncol 2023; 182:109575. [PMID: 36822356 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the anticipated clinical benefits of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), plan robustness may be compromised due to its sensitivity to patient treatment uncertainties, especially for tumours with large motion. In this study, we investigated treatment course-wise plan robustness for intra-thoracic tumours with large motion comparing a 4D pre-clinical evaluation method (4DREM) to our clinical 3D/4D dose reconstruction and accumulation methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty patients with large target motion (>10 mm) were treated with five times layered rescanned IMPT. The 3D-robust optimised plans were generated on the averaged planning 4DCT. Using multiple 4DCTs, treatment plan robustness was assessed on a weekly and treatment course-wise basis through the 3D robustness evaluation method (3DREM, based on averaged 4DCTs), the 4D robustness evaluation method (4DREM, including the time structure of treatment delivery and 4DCT phases) and 4D dose reconstruction and accumulation (4DREAL, based on fraction-wise information). RESULTS Baseline target motion for all patients ranged from 11-17 mm. For the offline adapted course-wise dose assessment, adequate target dose coverage was found for all patients. The target volume receiving 95% of the prescription dose was consistent between methods with 16/20 patients showing differences < 1%. 4DREAL showed the highest target coverage (99.8 ± 0.6%, p < 0.001), while no differences were observed between 3DREM and 4DREM (99.3 ± 1.3% and 99.4 ± 1.1%, respectively). CONCLUSION Our results show that intra-thoracic tumours can be adequately treated with IMPT in free breathing for target motion amplitudes up to 17 mm employing any of the accumulation methods. Anatomical changes, setup and range errors demonstrated a more severe impact on target coverage than motion in these patients treated with fractionated proton radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wahlstedt I, George Smith A, Andersen CE, Behrens CP, Nørring Bekke S, Boye K, van Overeem Felter M, Josipovic M, Petersen J, Risumlund SL, Tascón-Vidarte JD, van Timmeren JE, Vogelius IR. Interfractional dose accumulation for MR-guided liver SBRT: Variation among algorithms is highly patient- and fraction-dependent. Radiother Oncol 2022; 182:109448. [PMID: 36566988 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Daily plan adaptations could take the dose delivered in previous fractions into account. Due to high dose delivered per fraction, low number of fractions, steep dose gradients, and large interfractional organ deformations, this might be particularly important for liver SBRT. This study investigates inter-algorithm variation of interfractional dose accumulation for MR-guided liver SBRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed 27 consecutive MR-guided liver SBRT treatments of 67.5 Gy in three (n = 15) or 50 Gy in five fractions (n = 12), both prescribed to the GTV. We calculated fraction doses on daily patient anatomy, warped these doses to the simulation MRI using seven different algorithms, and accumulated the warped doses. Thus, we obtained differences in planned doses and warped or accumulated doses for each algorithm. This enabled us to calculate the inter-algorithm variations in warped doses per fraction and in accumulated doses per treatment course. RESULTS The four intensity-based algorithms were more consistent with planned PTV dose than affine or contour-based algorithms. The mean (range) variation of the dose difference for PTV D95% due to dose warping by these intensity-based algorithms was 10.4 percentage points (0.3 to 43.7) between fractions and 8.6 (0.3 to 24.9) between accumulated treatment doses. As seen by these ranges, the variation was very dependent on the patient and the fraction being analyzed. Nevertheless, no correlations between patient or plan characteristics on the one hand and inter-algorithm dose warping variation on the other hand was found. CONCLUSION Inter-algorithm dose accumulation variation is highly patient- and fraction-dependent for MR-guided liver SBRT. We advise against trusting a single algorithm for dose accumulation in liver SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isak Wahlstedt
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, Bygning 101A, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte (HGH), Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 7, 2730 Herlev, Denmark.
| | - Abraham George Smith
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus Erik Andersen
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, Bygning 101A, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Claus Preibisch Behrens
- Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Anker Engelunds Vej 1, Bygning 101A, 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte (HGH), Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 7, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Susanne Nørring Bekke
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte (HGH), Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 7, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Kristian Boye
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mette van Overeem Felter
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Herlev and Gentofte (HGH), Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 7, 2730 Herlev, Denmark
| | - Mirjana Josipovic
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jens Petersen
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Signe Lenora Risumlund
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - José David Tascón-Vidarte
- Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 1, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ivan Richter Vogelius
- Department of Oncology, Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet (RH), Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Visser S, O Ribeiro C, Dieters M, Mul VE, Niezink AGH, van der Schaaf A, Knopf AC, Langendijk JA, Korevaar EW, Both S, Muijs CT. Robustness assessment of clinical adaptive proton and photon radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer in the model-based approach. Radiother Oncol 2022; 177:197-204. [PMID: 36368472 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the Netherlands, oesophageal cancer (EC) patients are selected for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using the expected normal tissue complication probability reduction (ΔNTCP) when treating with IMPT compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In this study, we evaluate the robustness of the first EC patients treated with IMPT in our clinic in terms of target and organs-at-risk (OAR) dose with corresponding NTCP, as compared to VMAT. MATERIALS AND METHODS For 20 consecutive EC patients, clinical IMPT and VMAT plans were created on the average planning 4DCT. Both plans were robustly evaluated on weekly repeated 4DCTs and if target coverage degraded, replanning was performed. Target coverage was evaluated for complete treatment trajectories with and without replanning. The planned and accumulated mean lung dose (MLD) and mean heart dose (MHD) were additionally evaluated and translated into NTCP. RESULTS Replanning in the clinic was performed more often for IMPT (15x) than would have been needed for VMAT (8x) (p = 0.11). Both adaptive treatments would have resulted in adequate accumulated target dose coverage. Replanning in the first week of treatment had most clinical impact, as anatomical changes resulting in insufficient accumulated target coverage were already observed at this stage. No differences were found in MLD between the planned dose and the accumulated dose. Accumulated MHD differed from the planned dose (p < 0.001), but since these differences were similar for VMAT and IMPT (1.0 and 1.5 Gy, respectively), the ΔNTCP remained unchanged. CONCLUSION Following an adaptive clinical workflow, adequate target dose coverage and stable OAR doses with corresponding NTCPs was assured for both IMPT and VMAT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - Cássia O Ribeiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Margriet Dieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Veronique E Mul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Anne G H Niezink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arjen van der Schaaf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Antje-Christin Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Johannes A Langendijk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Erik W Korevaar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Stefan Both
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Christina T Muijs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Argota-Perez R, Sharma MB, Elstrøm UV, Møller DS, Grau C, Jensen K, Holm AIS, Korreman SS. Dose and robustness comparison of nominal, daily and accumulated doses for photon and proton treatment of sinonasal cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:102-108. [PMID: 35667574 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim was to evaluate and compare the dosimetric effect and robustness towards day-to-day anatomical and setup variations in the delivered dose for photon and proton treatments of sinonasal cancer (SNC) patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS Photon (VMAT) and proton (IMPT) plans were optimized retrospectively for 24 SNC patients. Synthetic CTs (synCT) were obtained by deforming the planning CT (pCT) to the anatomy of every daily cone-beam CT. Both VMAT and IMPT plans were recalculated on the synCTs. The recalculated daily dose was accumulated over the whole treatment on the pCT. Target coverage and dose to organs and risk (OARs) were evaluated for all patients for the nominal, daily and accumulated dose distribution. RESULTS In general, dose to OARs farther away from the target, including brain, chiasm and contralateral optic nerve, was lower for proton plans than photon plans. Whereas, OARs in proximity of the target received a lower dose for photon plans. For proton plans, the target coverage (volume of CTV receiving 95% of prescribed dose), V95%, fell below 99% for 9/24 patients in one or more fractions. For photon plans, 4/24 patients had one or more fractions where V95% fell below 99%. For accumulated doses, V95% was below 99% only in two cases, but above 98% for all patients. CONCLUSION Photon and proton treatment have different strengths regarding OAR sparing. The robustness was high for both treatment modalities. Patient selection for either proton or photon radiation therapy of SNC patients should be based on a case-by-case comparison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Argota-Perez
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - M B Sharma
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - U V Elstrøm
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - D S Møller
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - C Grau
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - K Jensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - A I S Holm
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - S S Korreman
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Willigenburg T, van der Velden JM, Zachiu C, Teunissen FR, Lagendijk JJW, Raaymakers BW, de Boer JCJ, van der Voort van Zyp JRN. Accumulated bladder wall dose is correlated with patient-reported acute urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic, daily adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 171:182-188. [PMID: 35489444 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerators (MR-Linac) enable accurate estimation of delivered doses through dose accumulation using daily MR images and treatment plans. We aimed to assess the association between the accumulated bladder (wall) dose and patient-reported acute urinary toxicity in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS One-hundred-and-thirty PCa patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac were included. Patients filled out International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) questionnaires at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment. Deformable image registration-based dose accumulation was performed to reconstruct the delivered dose. Dose parameters for both bladder and bladder wall were correlated with a clinically relevant increase in IPSS (≥10 points) and/or start of alpha-blockers within 3 months using logistic regression. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients (30%) experienced a clinically relevant IPSS increase and/or started with alpha-blockers. Bladder D5cm3, V10-35Gy (in %), and Dmean and Bladder wall V10-35Gy (cm3 and %) and Dmean were correlated with the outcome (odds ratios 1.04-1.33, p-values 0.001-0.044). Corrected for baseline characteristics, bladder V10-35Gy (in %) and Dmean and bladder wall V10-35Gy (cm3 and %) and Dmean were still correlated with the outcome (odds ratios 1.04-1.30, p-values 0.001-0.028). Bladder wall parameters generally showed larger AUC values. CONCLUSION This is the first study to assess the correlation between accumulated bladder wall dose and patient-reported urinary toxicity in PCa patients treated with MR-guided SBRT. The dose to the bladder wall is a promising parameter for prediction of patient-reported urinary toxicity and therefore warrants prospective validation and consideration in treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Willigenburg
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Joanne M van der Velden
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Cornel Zachiu
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik R Teunissen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan J W Lagendijk
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Bas W Raaymakers
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes C J de Boer
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
van de Lindt A, Nowee B, Janssen T, Schneider C, Remeijer P, van Pelt VWJ, Betgen A, Jansen EPM, Sonke JJ. Technical feasibility and clinical evaluation of 4D-MRI guided liver SBRT on the MR-linac. Radiother Oncol 2022:S0167-8140(22)00013-5. [PMID: 35033603 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Image-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an important local treatment for liver metastases. MRI-guidance enables direct tumor visualization, eliminating fiducial marker implantation. The purpose of this study was to test technical feasibility of our 4D-MRI guided liver SBRT workflow. Additionally, intra-fraction target motion and consequent target-coverage were studied. MATERIALS&METHODS Patients with liver metastases were included in this sub-study of the prospective UMBRELLA clinical trial. Patients received mid-position (midP) SBRT. The daily adapt-to-position workflow included localization, verification and intra-fraction tumor midP monitoring using 4D-MRI. Technical feasibility was established based on persistence of the treatment protocol, treatment time ≤1 hour, no geographical miss and no unexpected acute toxicity grade >3. All 4D-MRIs were registered to the planning midP-CT and tumor midP and amplitude were calculated. Additionally, delivered target dose was accumulated incorporating the 4D-MRI intra-fraction tumor motion and evaluated with Monte-Carlo error simulations. RESULTS 20 patients with liver metastases were included and treated with 4D-MRI guided SBRT. Feasibility criteria were met in all-but-one patient. No grade ≥3 acute toxicity was observed. Group mean (M), systematic and random midP-drifts were 2.4mm, 2.6mm and 3.1mm in CC-direction. 4D-MRI tumor CC-amplitudes were reduced compared to the simulation 4D-CT (M=-1.9mm) and decreased during treatment (M=-1.4mm). Dose accumulation showed adquate target-coverage on a population level. CONCLUSION We successfully demonstrated technical feasibility of 4D-MRI guided SBRT in a cohort of 20 patients with liver metastases. However, substantial midposition drifts occurred which stress the need for intra-fraction motion management strategies to further increase the precision of treatment delivery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Tamihardja J, Cirsi S, Kessler P, Razinskas G, Exner F, Richter A, Polat B, Flentje M. Cone beam CT-based dose accumulation and analysis of delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion in primary radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:205. [PMID: 34702305 PMCID: PMC8549146 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01933-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Evaluation of delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) for moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancer by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based dose accumulation and target coverage analysis. Methods Twenty-three patients with localized prostate cancer treated with moderately hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) between December 2016 and February 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Included patients were required to have an identifiable DIL on bi-parametric planning magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). After import into the RayStation treatment planning system and application of a step-wise density override, the fractional doses were computed on each CBCT and were consecutively mapped onto the planning CT via a deformation vector field derived from deformable image registration. Fractional doses were accumulated for all CBCTs and interpolated for missing CBCTs, resulting in the delivered dose for PTVDIL, PTVBoost, PTV, and the organs at risk. The location of the index lesions was recorded according to the sector map of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) Version 2.1. Target coverage of the index lesions was evaluated and stratified for location. Results In total, 338 CBCTs were available for analysis. Dose accumulation target coverage of PTVDIL, PTVBoost, and PTV was excellent and no cases of underdosage in DMean, D95%, D02%, and D98% could be detected. Delivered rectum DMean did not significantly differ from the planned dose. Bladder mean DMean was higher than planned with 19.4 ± 7.4 Gy versus 18.8 ± 7.5 Gy, p < 0.001. The penile bulb showed a decreased delivered mean DMean with 29.1 ± 14.0 Gy versus 29.8 ± 14.4 Gy, p < 0.001. Dorsal DILs, defined as DILs in the posterior medial peripheral zone of the prostate, showed a significantly lower delivered dose with a mean DMean difference of 2.2 Gy (95% CI 1.3–3.1 Gy, p < 0.001) compared to ventral lesions. Conclusions CBCT-based dose accumulation showed an adequate delivered dose to the dominant intraprostatic lesion and organs at risk within planning limits. Cautious evaluation of the target coverage for index lesions adjacent to the rectum is warranted to avoid underdosage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jörg Tamihardja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany.
| | - Sinan Cirsi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Patrick Kessler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Gary Razinskas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Florian Exner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Anne Richter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Bülent Polat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Flentje
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wuerzburg, Josef-Schneider-Str. 11, 97080, Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kanehira T, van Kranen S, Jansen T, Hamming-Vrieze O, Al-Mamgani A, Sonke JJ. Comparisons of normal tissue complication probability models derived from planned and delivered dose for head and neck cancer patients. Radiother Oncol 2021; 164:209-215. [PMID: 34619234 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models are typically derived from the planned dose distribution, which can deviate from the delivered dose due to anatomical day-to-day variations. The aim of this study was to compare NTCP models derived from the planned and the delivered dose for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD 322 HNC patients who received radiotherapy with daily CBCT guidance were included in this retrospective study. The delivered dose was estimated by deformably accumulating dose from daily CBCT to planning anatomy. We used a Lyman-Kutcher-Burman NTCP model, to relate the equivalent uniform dose (EUD) of organs at risk (OAR) with oral mucositis, xerostomia and dysphagia respectively. We compared the model parameters and performances. RESULTS The median differences between planned and delivered EUD to the OARs were significantly larger for patients with toxicity than without for acute dysphagia (≥G2 and ≥G3) and late dysphagia (≥G3) (p < 0.05). Those differences resulted in small differences in steepness and agreement to the data between delivered- and planned-fitted NTCP curves, and the differences were not significant. The differences in AUC were less than 0.01. CONCLUSION Differences between delivered and planned dose did not lead to significant differences in NTCP curves. The additional clinical relevance of NTCP models using accumulated dose for oral mucositis, xerostomia and dysphagia in HNC radiotherapy is likely to be limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Kanehira
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simon van Kranen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tomas Jansen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Olga Hamming-Vrieze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Abrahim Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Juan-Cruz C, Stam B, Belderbos J, Sonke JJ. Delivered dose-effect analysis of radiation induced rib fractures after thoracic SBRT. Radiother Oncol 2021; 162:18-25. [PMID: 34166718 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Anatomical changes during the stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may cause the delivered dose to deviate from the planned dose. We investigate if normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models based on the delivered dose predict radiation-induced rib fractures better than models based on the planned dose. MATERIAL AND METHODS 437 NSCLC patients treated to a median dose of 3x18 Gy were included. Delivered dose was estimated by accumulating EQD2-corrected fraction doses after being deformed with daily CBCT-to-planning CT deformable image registration. Dosimetric parameters Dx (dose to a relative volume x) were extracted for each rib included in the CBCTs field-of-view. An NTCP model was constructed for both planned and delivered dose, optimizing the parameters TD50 (dose with 50% toxicity risk), m (steepness of the curve) and x, using maximum likelihood estimation. Best NTCP model was determined using Akaike weights (Aw). Differences between the models were tested for significance using the Vuong's test. RESULTS Median time to fracture of 110 fractured ribs was 22.5 months. The maximum rib dose, D0, best predicted fractures for both planned and delivered dose. The average delivered D0 was significantly lower than planned (p < 0.001). NTCP model based on the delivered D0 was the best, with Aw = 0.95. The models were not significantly different. CONCLUSION Delivered maximum dose to the ribs was significantly lower than planned. The NTCP model based on delivered dose improved predictions of radiation-induced rib fractures but did not reach statistical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celia Juan-Cruz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Barbara Stam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - José Belderbos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Jakob Sonke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mastella E, Mirandola A, Russo S, Vai A, Magro G, Molinelli S, Barcellini A, Vitolo V, Orlandi E, Ciocca M. High-dose hypofractionated pencil beam scanning carbon ion radiotherapy for lung tumors: Dosimetric impact of different spot sizes and robustness to interfractional uncertainties. Phys Med 2021; 85:79-86. [PMID: 33984821 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2021] [Revised: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The robustness against setup and motion uncertainties of gated four-dimensional restricted robust optimization (4DRRO) was investigated for hypofractionated carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) of lung tumors. METHODS CIRT plans of 9 patients were optimized using 4DRRO strategy with 3 mm setup errors, 3% density errors and 3 breathing phases related to the gate window. The prescription was 60 Gy(RBE) in 4 fractions. Standard spots (SS) were compared to big spots (BS). Plans were recalculated on multiple 4DCTs acquired within 3 weeks from treatment simulation and rigidly registered with planning images using bone matching. Warped dose distributions were generated using deformable image registration and accumulated on the planning 4DCTs. Target coverage (D98%, D95% and V95%) and dose to lung were evaluated in the recalculated and accumulated dose distributions. RESULTS Comparable target coverage was obtained with both spot sizes (p = 0.53 for D95%). The mean lung dose increased of 0.6 Gy(RBE) with BS (p = 0.0078), still respecting the dose constraint of a 4-fraction stereotactic treatment for the risk of radiation pneumonitis. Statistically significant differences were found in the recalculated and accumulated D95% (p = 0.048 and p = 0.024), with BS showing to be more robust. Using BS, the average degradations of the D98%, D95% and V95% in the accumulated doses were -2.7%, -1.6% and -1.5%. CONCLUSIONS Gated 4DRRO was highly robust against setup and motion uncertainties. BS increased the dose to healthy tissues but were more robust than SS. The selected optimization settings guaranteed adequate target coverage during the simulated treatment course with acceptable risk of toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edoardo Mastella
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy.
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Russo
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vai
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Mario Ciocca
- CNAO, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy, Strada Campeggi 53, I-27100 Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Niebuhr NI, Splinter M, Bostel T, Seco J, Hentschke CM, Floca RO, Hörner-Rieber J, Alber M, Huber P, Nicolay NH, Pfaffenberger A. Biologically consistent dose accumulation using daily patient imaging. Radiat Oncol 2021; 16:65. [PMID: 33823885 PMCID: PMC8025323 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-021-01789-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This work addresses a basic inconsistency in the way dose is accumulated in radiotherapy when predicting the biological effect based on the linear quadratic model (LQM). To overcome this inconsistency, we introduce and evaluate the concept of the total biological dose, bEQDd. METHODS Daily computed tomography imaging of nine patients treated for prostate carcinoma with intensity-modulated radiotherapy was used to compute the delivered deformed dose on the basis of deformable image registration (DIR). We compared conventional dose accumulation (DA) with the newly introduced bEQDd, a new method of accumulating biological dose that considers each fraction dose and tissue radiobiology. We investigated the impact of the applied fractionation scheme (conventional/hypofractionated), uncertainties induced by the DIR and by the assigned α/β-value. RESULTS bEQDd was systematically higher than the conventionally accumulated dose with difference hot spots of 3.3-4.9 Gy detected in six out of nine patients in regions of high dose gradient in the bladder and rectum. For hypofractionation, differences are up to 8.4 Gy. The difference amplitude was found to be in a similar range to worst-case uncertainties induced by DIR and was higher than that induced by α/β. CONCLUSION Using bEQDd for dose accumulation overcomes a potential systematic inaccuracy in biological effect prediction based on accumulated dose. Highest impact is found for serial-type late responding organs at risk in dose gradient regions and for hypofractionation. Although hot spot differences are in the order of several Gray, in dose-volume parameters there is little difference compared with using conventional or biological DA. However, when local dose information is used, e.g. dose surface maps, difference hot spots can potentially change outcomes of dose-response modelling and adaptive treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina I Niebuhr
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Mona Splinter
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tilman Bostel
- Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology", German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.,Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Clemens M Hentschke
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ralf O Floca
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology", German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus Alber
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Huber
- Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology", German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Clinical Cooperation Unit "Radiation Oncology", German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Asja Pfaffenberger
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bohoudi O, Bruynzeel AME, Tetar S, Slotman BJ, Palacios MA, Lagerwaard FJ. Dose accumulation for personalized stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy in prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol 2021; 157:197-202. [PMID: 33545251 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is an innovative approach for delivering stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in prostate cancer (PC). Despite the increased clinical use of SBRT for PC, there is limited data on the relation between the actual delivered dose and toxicity. We aimed to identify dose parameters based on the total accumulated delivered bladder dose (DOSEACCTX). Furthermore, for future personalization, we studied whether prospective accumulation of the first 3 of 5 fractions (DOSEACC3FR) could be used as a representative of DOSEACCTX. MATERIALS AND METHODS We deployed a recently validated deformable image registration-based dose accumulation strategy to reconstruct DOSEACCTX and DOSEACC3FR in 101 PC patients treated with stereotactic MRgRT. IPSS scores at baseline, end of MRgRT, at 6 and 12 weeks after treatment were analyzed to identify a clinically relevant increase of acute urinary symptoms. A receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to investigate the correlation of an increase in IPSS and bladder DOSEACCTX (range V5-V36.25 Gy, D1cc, D5cc) and DOSEACC3FR (range V6-V21.8 Gy, D1cc, D5cc) parameters. RESULTS A clinically relevant increase in IPSS in the three months following MRgRT was observed in 25 patients. The V20Gy-32Gy from DOSEACCTX and V15Gy-18Gy from DOSEACC3FR showed good correlation with IPSS increase with area under the curve (AUC) values ranging from 0.71 to 0.75. In contrast, baseline dosimetry showed a poor correlation with AUC values between 0.53 and 0.62. CONCLUSION DOSEACCTX was superior to baseline dosimetry in predicting acute urinary symptoms. Because DOSEACC3FR also showed good correlation, this can potentially be used to optimize MRgRT for the remaining fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Bohoudi
- Dept. Of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Anna M E Bruynzeel
- Dept. Of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shyama Tetar
- Dept. Of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Dept. Of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel A Palacios
- Dept. Of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frank J Lagerwaard
- Dept. Of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Xu Y, Diwanji T, Brovold N, Butkus M, Padgett KR, Schmidt RM, King A, Dal Pra A, Abramowitz M, Pollack A, Dogan N. Assessment of daily dose accumulation for robustly optimized intensity modulated proton therapy treatment of prostate cancer. Phys Med 2021; 81:77-85. [PMID: 33445124 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.11.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To implement a daily CBCT based dose accumulation technique in order to assess ideal robust optimization (RO) parameters for IMPT treatment of prostate cancer. METHODS Ten prostate cancer patients previously treated with VMAT and having daily CBCT were included. First, RO-IMPT plans were created with ± 3 mm and ± 5 mm patient setup and ± 3% proton range uncertainties, respectively. Second, the planning CT (pCT) was deformably registered to the CBCT to create a synthetic CT (sCT). Both daily and weekly sampling strategies were employed to determine optimal dose accumulation frequency. Doses were recalculated on sCTs for both ± 3 mm/±3% and ± 5 mm/±3% uncertainties and were accumulated back to the pCT. Accumulated doses generated from ± 3 mm/±3% and ± 5 mm/±3% RO-IMPT plans were evaluated using the clinical dose volume constraints for CTV, bladder, and rectum. RESULTS Daily accumulated dose based on both ± 3mm/±3% and ±5 mm/±3% uncertainties for RO-IMPT plans resulted in satisfactory CTV coverage (RO-IMPT3mm/3% CTVV95 = 99.01 ± 0.87% vs. RO-IMPT5mm/3% CTVV95 = 99.81 ± 0.2%, P = 0.002). However, the accumulated dose based on ± 3 mm/3% RO-IMPT plans consistently provided greater OAR sparing than ±5 mm/±3% RO-IMPT plans (RO-IMPT3mm/3% rectumV65Gy = 2.93 ± 2.39% vs. RO-IMPT5mm/3% rectumV65Gy = 4.38 ± 3%, P < 0.01; RO-IMPT3mm/3% bladderV65Gy = 5.2 ± 7.12% vs. RO-IMPT5mm/3% bladderV65Gy = 7.12 ± 9.59%, P < 0.01). The gamma analysis showed high dosimetric agreement between weekly and daily accumulated dose distributions. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated that for RO-IMPT optimization, ±3mm/±3% uncertainty is sufficient to create plans that meet desired CTV coverage while achieving superior sparing to OARs when compared with ± 5 mm/±3% uncertainty. Furthermore, weekly dose accumulation can accurately estimate the overall dose delivered to prostate cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yihang Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Tejan Diwanji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nellie Brovold
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael Butkus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Kyle R Padgett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Ryder M Schmidt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Adam King
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Matt Abramowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alan Pollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Nesrin Dogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kong VC, Rosewall T, Catton C, Chung P, Warde P, Craig T, Bayley A. Prostate or bone? Comparing the efficacy of image guidance surrogates for pelvis and prostate radiotherapy using accumulated delivered dose. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci 2020; 52:14-21. [PMID: 33139231 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/02/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study assessed the impact of dosimetry to both the target and normal tissue when either bony anatomy (BA) or prostate (PRO) was used as surrogates for image guidance for pelvis and prostate radiotherapy using a dose accumulation process. METHODS Thirty patients who were prescribed 50-54Gy to the pelvic lymph nodes (PLN) and 78Gy to the prostate/seminal vesicles were included. Daily acquired CBCTs were rigidly registered to the CT using BA and PRO to simulate two different treatment positions. The accumulated delivered dose (DAcc) of PLN, prostate, bladder and rectum for each surrogate were compared with the planned dose. Deviation from the planned dose (ΔDAcc-Plan) of >5% was considered clinically significant. RESULTS Prostate was displaced from bony anatomy by > 5 mm in 96/755 fractions (12.7%). Deviation between the mean DAcc and the planned dose for PLN and prostate was <2% when either BA or PRO was used. No significant deviation from planned dose was observed for bladder (p > 0.2). In contrary, DAcc for rectum D50 was significantly greater than the planned dose when BA was used (Mean ΔDAcc-Plan = 6%). When examining individual patient, deviation from the planned dose for rectum D50 was clinically significant for 18 patients for BA (Range: 5-21%) and only 8 patients for PRO (Range: 5-8%). CONCLUSIONS The use of either BA or PRO for image guidance could deliver dose to PLN and prostate with minimal deviation from the plan using existing PTV margins. However, deviation for rectum was greater when BA was used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vickie C Kong
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| | - Tara Rosewall
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Charles Catton
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Padraig Warde
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tim Craig
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew Bayley
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Mayorov K, Ali E. Magnitude and dosimetric impact of inter-fractional positional variations of the metal port of tissue expanders in postmastectomy patients treated with radiation. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 16:37-42. [PMID: 33458342 PMCID: PMC7807575 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Revised: 09/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Postmastectomy breast reconstruction involves the insertion of a temporary tissue expander, which contains a metal injection port. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude and dosimetric impact of the inter-fractional positional variations of the port for patients treated with radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS For nine breast cases treated on Tomotherapy, the deviation of the port in the daily MVCT from its reference position was measured in the three cardinal directions. The dosimetric effects of the measured errors were evaluated for two classes of error: Internal Port Error (IPE) and Patient Registration Error (PRE). For each class, dose accumulation was done for daily measured errors and a systematic error. RESULTS Inter-fractional positional errors of the port were small, with 87% of the deviations below 5 mm, but errors larger than 1.5 cm were observed. The cumulative effect of the daily measured and systematic IPE decreased target coverage by as much as 2.8% and 3.5%, respectively. The cumulative effect of the daily measured PRE decreased target coverage by an average of 3.5%. The cumulative effect of a systematic PRE significantly decreased target coverage by an average of 16%. CONCLUSION The presence of IPE over the course of treatment had minimal clinical impact while PRE had a greater impact on clinically-relevant regions. The robustness of treatment delivery can be improved by assigning the port its appropriate density during planning despite contouring uncertainties due to metal artefacts, and by prioritizing anatomical alignment over port alignment during daily registration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keren Mayorov
- Department of Physics, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Elsayed Ali
- Department of Physics, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Canada
- The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, 501 Smyth Road, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Alam S, Thor M, Rimner A, Tyagi N, Zhang SY, Kuo LC, Nadeem S, Lu W, Hu YC, Yorke E, Zhang P. Quantification of accumulated dose and associated anatomical changes of esophagus using weekly Magnetic Resonance Imaging acquired during radiotherapy of locally advanced lung cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 13:36-43. [PMID: 32411833 PMCID: PMC7224352 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2020.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
MRI is suited for tracking volumetric changes/accumulating doses in the esophagus. Introduced medial axis of esophagus to calculate inter-fraction positional uncertainty. Planned and accumulated esophagus dose-volume parameter differences are significant. Longitudinal expansion of esophagus may link to acute esophagitis.
Background and purpose Minimizing acute esophagitis (AE) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is critical given the proximity between the esophagus and the tumor. In this pilot study, we developed a clinical platform for quantification of accumulated doses and volumetric changes of esophagus via weekly Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for adaptive radiotherapy (RT). Material and methods Eleven patients treated via intensity-modulated RT to 60–70 Gy in 2–3 Gy-fractions with concurrent chemotherapy underwent weekly MRIs. Eight patients developed AE grade 2 (AE2), 3–6 weeks after RT started. First, weekly MRI esophagus contours were rigidly propagated to planning CT and the distances between the medial esophageal axes were calculated as positional uncertainties. Then, the weekly MRI were deformably registered to the planning CT and the total dose delivered to esophagus was accumulated. Weekly Maximum Esophagus Expansion (MEex) was calculated using the Jacobian map. Eventually, esophageal dose parameters (Mean Esophagus Dose (MED), V90% and D5cc) between the planned and accumulated dose were compared. Results Positional esophagus uncertainties were 6.8 ± 1.8 mm across patients. For the entire cohort at the end of RT: the median accumulated MED was significantly higher than the planned dose (24 Gy vs. 21 Gy p = 0.006). The median V90% and D5cc were 12.5 cm3 vs. 11.5 cm3 (p = 0.05) and 61 Gy vs. 60 Gy (p = 0.01), for accumulated and planned dose, respectively. The median MEex was 24% and was significantly associated with AE2 (p = 0.008). Conclusions MRI is well suited for tracking esophagus volumetric changes and accumulating doses. Longitudinal esophagus expansion could reflect radiation-induced inflammation that may link to AE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadegh Alam
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Maria Thor
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Neelam Tyagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Si-Yuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Li Cheng Kuo
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Saad Nadeem
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Yu-Chi Hu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| | - Pengpeng Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tong Y, Gong G, Su M, Yin Y. Comparison of the dose on specific 3DCT images and the accumulated dose for cardiac structures in esophageal tumors radiotherapy: whether specific 3DCT images can be used for dose assessment? Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:242. [PMID: 31881901 PMCID: PMC6935068 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1450-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiac activity could impact the accuracy of dose assessment for the heart, pericardium and left ventricular myocardium (LVM). The purpose of this study was to explore whether it is possible to perform dose assessment by contouring the cardiac structures on specific three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) images to reduce the impact of cardiac activity. METHODS Electrocardiograph-gated 4DCT (ECG-gated 4DCT) images of 22 patients in breath-hold were collected. MIM Maestro 6.8.2 (MIM) was used to reconstruct specific 3DCT images to obtain the Maximal intensity projection (MIP) image, Average intensity projection (AIP) image and Minimum intensity projection (Min-IP) image. The heart, pericardium and LVM were contoured in 20 phases of 4DCT images (0, 5%... 95%) and the MIP, AIP and Min-IP images. Then, a radiotherapy plan was designed at the 0% phase of the 4DCT images, and the dose was transplanted to all phases of 4DCT to acquire the dose on all phases, the accumulated dose of all phases was calculated using MIM. The dose on MIP, AIP and Min-IP images were also obtained by deformable registration of the dose. The mean dose (Dmean), V5, V10, V20, V30 and V40 for the heart, pericardium and LVM in MIP, AIP and Min-IP images were compared with the corresponding parameters after dose accumulation. RESULTS The mean values of the difference between the Dmean in the MIP image and the Dmean after accumulation for the heart, pericardium and LVM were all less than 1.50 Gy, and the dose difference for the pericardium and LVM was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). For dose-volume parameters, there was no statistically significant difference between V5, V10, and V20 of the heart and pericardium in MIP, AIP, and Min-IP images and those after accumulation (p > 0.05). For the LVM, only in the MIP image, the differences of V5, V10, V20, V30 and V40 were not significant compared to those after dose accumulation (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS There was a smallest difference for the dosimetry parameters of cardiac structures on MIP image compared to corresponding parameters after dose accumulation. Therefore, it is recommended to use the MIP image for the delineation and dose assessment of cardiac structures in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Tong
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Guanzhong Gong
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China
| | - Ming Su
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Yong Yin
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ciarmatori A, Maffei N, Mistretta GM, Ceroni P, Bernabei A, Meduri B, D'Angelo E, Bruni A, Giacobazzi P, Lohr F, Guidi G. Evaluation of the effectiveness of novel single-intervention adaptive radiotherapy strategies based on daily dose accumulation. Med Dosim 2019; 44:379-384. [PMID: 30871864 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2019.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Parotid gland (PG) shrinkage and neck volume reduction during radiotherapy of head and neck (H&N) cancer patients is a clinical issue that has prompted interest in adaptive radiotherapy (ART). This study focuses on the difference between planned dose and delivered dose and the possible effects of an efficient replanning strategy during the course of treatment. Six patients with H&N cancer treated by tomotherapy were retrospectively enrolled. Thirty daily dose distributions (DMVCT) were calculated on pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) scans. Deformable Image Registration which matched daily MVCT with treatment planning kilovoltage computed tomography was performed. Using the resulting deformation vector field, all daily DMVCT were deformed to the planning kilovoltage computed tomography and resulting doses were accumulated voxel per voxel. Cumulative DMVCT was compared to planned dose distribution performing γ-analysis (2 mm, 2% of 2.2 Gy). Two single-intervention ART strategies were executed on the 18th fraction whose previous data had suggested to be a suitable timepoint for a single replanning intervention: (1) replanning on the original target and deformed organ at risks (OARs) (a "safer" approach regarding tumor coverage) and (2) replanning on both deformed target and deformed OARs. DMVCT showed differences between planned and delivered doses (3D-γ 2mm/2%-passing rate = 85 ± 1%, p < 0.001). Voxel by voxel dose accumulation showed an increase in average dose of warped PG of 3.0 Gy ± 3.3 Gy. With ART the average dose of warped PG decreased by 3.2 Gy ± 1.7 Gy in comparison to delivered dose without replanning when both target and OARs were deformed. Average dose of warped PG decreased by 2.0 Gy ± 1.4 Gy when only OARs were deformed. Anatomical variations lead to increased doses to PGs. Efficient single-intervention ART-strategies with replanning on the 18th MVCT result a reduced PG dose. A strategy with deformation of both target and OAR resulted in the lowest PG dose, while formally maintaining PTV coverage. Deformation of only OAR nevertheless reduces PG dose and has less uncertainties regarding PTV coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Ciarmatori
- Deptartment of Medical Physics, A.O. Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Nicola Maffei
- Department of Medical Physics, A.O. U. di Modena, Modena, Italy; Post Graduate School in Medical Physics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Paola Ceroni
- Department of Medical Physics, A.O. U. di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Meduri
- Department of Oncology, A.O. U. di Modena, Radiotherapy Unit, Modena, Italy
| | - Elisa D'Angelo
- Department of Oncology, A.O. U. di Modena, Radiotherapy Unit, Modena, Italy
| | - Alessio Bruni
- Department of Oncology, A.O. U. di Modena, Radiotherapy Unit, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Frank Lohr
- Department of Oncology, A.O. U. di Modena, Radiotherapy Unit, Modena, Italy
| | - Gabriele Guidi
- Department of Medical Physics, A.O. U. di Modena, Modena, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen J, Chen H, Zhong Z, Wang Z, Hrycushko B, Zhou L, Jiang S, Albuquerque K, Gu X, Zhen X. Investigating rectal toxicity associated dosimetric features with deformable accumulated rectal surface dose maps for cervical cancer radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:125. [PMID: 29980214 PMCID: PMC6035458 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1068-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2017] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Better knowledge of the dose-toxicity relationship is essential for safe dose escalation to improve local control in cervical cancer radiotherapy. The conventional dose-toxicity model is based on the dose volume histogram, which is the parameter lacking spatial dose information. To overcome this limit, we explore a comprehensive rectal dose-toxicity model based on both dose volume histogram and dose map features for accurate radiation toxicity prediction. METHODS Forty-two cervical cancer patients treated with combined external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) were retrospectively studied, including 12 with Grade ≥ 2 rectum toxicity and 30 patients with Grade 0-1 toxicity (non-toxicity patients). The cumulative equivalent 2-Gy rectal surface dose was deformably summed using the deformation vector fields obtained through a recent developed local topology preserved non-rigid point matching algorithm. The cumulative three-dimensional (3D) dose was flattened and mapped to a two-dimensional (2D) plane to obtain the rectum surface dose map (RSDM). The dose volume parameters (DVPs) were calculated from the 3D rectum surface, while the texture features and the dose geometric parameters (DGPs) were extracted from the 2D RSDM. Representative features further computed from DVPs, textures and DGPs by principle component analysis (PCA) and statistical analysis were respectively fed into a support vector machine equipped with a sequential feature selection procedure. The predictive powers of the representative features were compared with the GEC-ESTRO dosimetric parameters D0.1/1/2cm3. RESULTS Satisfactory predictive accuracy of sensitivity 74.75 and 84.75%, specificity 72.67 and 79.87%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.82 and 0.91 were respectively achieved by the PCA features and statistical significant features, which were superior to the D0.1/1/2cm3 (AUC 0.71). The relative area in dose levels of 64Gy, 67Gy, 68Gy, 87Gy, 88Gy and 89Gy, perimeters in dose levels of 89Gy, as well as two texture features were ranked as the important factors that were closely correlated with rectal toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Our extensive experimental results have demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed scheme. A future large patient cohort study is still needed for model validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiawei Chen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
| | - Haibin Chen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China
| | - Zichun Zhong
- Department of Computer Science, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, 48202, USA
| | - Zhuoyu Wang
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, 805 Sherbrooke Street West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 0G4, Canada
| | - Brian Hrycushko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Linghong Zhou
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
| | - Steve Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Kevin Albuquerque
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA
| | - Xuejun Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
| | - Xin Zhen
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Poder J, Yuen J, Howie A, Bece A, Bucci J. Dose accumulation of multiple high dose rate prostate brachytherapy treatments in two commercially available image registration systems. Phys Med 2017; 43:43-8. [PMID: 29195561 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Revised: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 10/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to assess whether deformable image registration (DIR) is required for dose accumulation of multiple high dose rate prostate brachytherapy (HDRPBT) plans treated with the same catheter pattern on two different CT datasets. METHOD DIR was applied to 20 HDRPBT patients' planning CT images who received two treatment fractions on sequential days, on two different CT datasets, with the same implant. Quality of DIR in Velocity and MIM image registration systems was assessed by calculating the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and mean distance to agreement (MDA) for the prostate, urethra and rectum contours. Accumulated doses from each system were then calculated using the same DIR technique and dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters compared to manual addition with no DIR. RESULTS The average DSC was found to be 0.83 (Velocity) and 0.84 (MIM), 0.80 (Velocity) and 0.80 (MIM), 0.80 (Velocity) and 0.81 (MIM), for the prostate, rectum and urethra contours, respectively. The average difference in calculated DVH parameters between the two systems using dose accumulation was less than 1%, and there was no statistically significant difference found between deformably accumulated doses in the two systems versus manual DVH addition with no DIR. CONCLUSION Contour propagation using DIR in velocity and MIM was shown to be at least equivalent to inter-observer contouring variability on CT. The results also indicate that dose accumulation through manual addition of DVH parameters may be sufficient for HDRPBT treatments treated with the same catheter pattern on two different CT datasets.
Collapse
|
28
|
Rosewall T, Wheat J, Currie G, Kong V, Bayley AJ, Moseley J, Chung P, Catton C, Craig T, Milosevic M. Planned versus 'delivered' bladder dose reconstructed using solid and hollow organ models during prostate cancer IMRT. Radiother Oncol 2016; 119:417-22. [PMID: 27072936 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 03/11/2016] [Accepted: 03/13/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE All studies to date have evaluated the dosimetric effect of bladder deformation using an organ model that includes the dose to the urine. This research reconstructed bladder dose using both hollow and solid organ models, to determine if dose/volume differences exist. MATERIALS AND METHODS 35 prostate IMRT patients were selected, who had received 78Gy in 39 fractions and full bladder instructions. Biomechanical modelling and finite element analysis were used to reconstruct bladder dose (solid and hollow organ model) using every third CBCT throughout the treatment course. RESULTS Reconstructed dose (ReconDose) was 11.3Gy greater than planned dose (planDose) with a hollow bladder model (p<0.001) and 12.3Gy greater with a solid bladder model (p<0.0001). Median reconstructed volumes within the 30Gy, 65Gy and 78Gy isodoses were 3-4 times larger with the solid organ model (p<0.0001). The difference between planning bladder volume and median treatment volume was associated with the difference between the planDose and reconDose below 78Gy (R(2)>0.61). CONCLUSIONS Substantial differences exist between planned and reconstructed bladder dose, associated with the differences in bladder filling between planning and treatment. Dose reconstructed using a solid bladder model over-reports the volume of bladder within key isodose levels and overestimates the differences between planned and reconstructed dose. Dose reconstruction with a hollow organ model is recommended if the goal is to associate that dose with toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara Rosewall
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada; Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Australia.
| | - Janelle Wheat
- Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia
| | - Geoffrey Currie
- Faculty of Science, Charles Sturt University, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Australia
| | - Vickie Kong
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Andrew J Bayley
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Joanne Moseley
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Peter Chung
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Charles Catton
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Tim Craig
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| | - Michael Milosevic
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Vestergaard A, Hafeez S, Muren LP, Nill S, Høyer M, Hansen VN, Grønborg C, Pedersen EM, Petersen JB, Huddart R, Oelfke U. The potential of MRI-guided online adaptive re-optimisation in radiotherapy of urinary bladder cancer. Radiother Oncol 2016; 118:154-9. [PMID: 26631646 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2015] [Revised: 11/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) using plan selection is being introduced clinically for bladder cancer, but the challenge of how to compensate for intra-fractional motion remains. The purpose of this study was to assess target coverage with respect to intra-fractional motion and the potential for normal tissue sparing in MRI-guided ART (MRIGART) using isotropic (MRIGARTiso), an-isotropic (MRIGARTanIso) and population-based margins (MRIGARTpop). MATERIALS AND METHODS Nine bladder cancer patients treated in a phase II trial of plan selection underwent 6-7 weekly repeat MRI series, each with volumetric scans acquired over a 10 min period. Adaptive re-planning on the 0 min MRI scans was performed using density override, simulating a hypo-fractionated schedule. Target coverage was evaluated on the 10 min scan to quantify the impact of intra-fractional motion. RESULTS MRIGARTanIso reduced the course-averaged PTV by median 304 cc compared to plan selection. Bladder shifts affected target coverage in individual fractions for all strategies. Two patients had a v95% of the bladder below 98% for MRIGARTiso. MRIGARTiso decreased the bowel V25 with 15-46 cc compared to MRIGARTpop. CONCLUSION Online re-optimised ART has a considerable normal tissue sparing potential. MRIGART with online corrections for target shift during a treatment fraction should be considered in ART for bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Vestergaard
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University/Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Shaista Hafeez
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Ludvig P Muren
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University/Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Simeon Nill
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Morten Høyer
- Department of Oncology, AarhusUniversity/Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Vibeke N Hansen
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Grønborg
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University/Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Erik M Pedersen
- Department of Radiology, Aarhus University/Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Jørgen B Petersen
- Department of Medical Physics, Aarhus University/Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Robert Huddart
- Academic Urology Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Uwe Oelfke
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sun B, Yang D, Esthappan J, Garcia-Ramirez J, Price S, Mutic S, Schwarz JK, Grigsby PW, Tanderup K. Three-dimensional dose accumulation in pseudo-split-field IMRT and brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 2015; 14:481-9. [PMID: 25958039 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2015] [Revised: 04/02/2015] [Accepted: 04/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dose accumulation of split-field external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy (BT) is challenging because of significant EBRT and BT dose gradients in the central pelvic region. We developed a method to determine biologically effective dose parameters for combined split-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and image-guided BT in locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty-three patients treated with split-field-IMRT to 45.0-51.2 Gy in 1.6-1.8 Gy per fraction to the elective pelvic lymph nodes and to 20 Gy to the central pelvis region were included in this study. Patients received six weekly fractions of high-dose rate BT to 6.5-7.3 Gy per fraction. A dose tracker software was developed to compute the equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2) to gross tumor volume (GTV), organs-at-risk and point A. Total dose-volume histogram parameters were computed on the 3D combined EQD2 dose based on rigid image registration. The dose accumulation uncertainty introduced by organ deformations between IMRT and BT was evaluated. RESULTS According to International Commission on Radiation Unit and Measurement and GEC European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology recommendations, D98, D90, D50, and D2cm3 EQD2 dose-volume histogram parameters were computed. GTV D98 was 84.0 ± 26.5 Gy and D2cc was 99.6 ± 13.9 Gy, 67.4 ± 12.2 Gy, 75.0 ± 10.1 Gy, for bladder, rectum, and sigmoid, respectively. The uncertainties induced by organ deformation were estimated to be -1 ± 4 Gy, -3 ± 5 Gy, 2 ± 3 Gy, and -3 ± 5 Gy for bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and GTV, respectively. CONCLUSIONS It is feasible to perform 3D EQD2 dose accumulation to assess high and intermediate dose regions for combined split-field IMRT and BT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baozhou Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Saint Louis, MO.
| | - Deshan Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Saint Louis, MO
| | - Jackie Esthappan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Saint Louis, MO
| | | | - Samantha Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Saint Louis, MO
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Saint Louis, MO
| | - Julie K Schwarz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Saint Louis, MO
| | - Perry W Grigsby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Saint Louis, MO
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University Saint Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Meijneke TR, Petit SF, Wentzler D, Hoogeman M, Nuyttens JJ. Reirradiation and stereotactic radiotherapy for tumors in the lung: dose summation and toxicity. Radiother Oncol 2013; 107:423-7. [PMID: 23647748 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2012] [Revised: 03/20/2013] [Accepted: 03/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the accumulated dose and the toxicity after reirradiation for tumors in the lung using non-rigid registration. MATERIAL AND METHODS Twenty patients with a tumor in the lung were reirradiated with or after stereotactic radiotherapy. The summed dose distribution was calculated using non-rigid registration. All doses were recalculated to an equivalent dose of 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). The median follow-up time was 12 months (range 2-52). RESULTS The median Dmax of the lung in the summed plans was 363 Gy3 (range 123-590). The median accumulated V20 of the lungs was 15.2%. Seven patients had in the heart and the trachea an accumulated dose ≥70 Gy3, with a median D(max) of the heart of 115 Gy3 and 89 Gy3 for the trachea. Eight patients had in the esophagus an accumulated dose ≥70 Gy3, with a median accumulated dose of 85 Gy3. No grade 3-5 toxicity was observed. CONCLUSION Reirradiation of the lung with or after stereotactic radiotherapy is feasible to a median Dmax of 363 Gy3 to the lung, as low toxicity was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R Meijneke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|