Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Features of Angiosarcoma: Significance of Prior Radiation Therapy

Angiosarcoma: a 10-year retrospective study from a high-volume UK regional referral centre

PURPOSE

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare malignancy with considerable heterogeneity seen in its aetiology, anatomical location, and clinicopathological behaviour. Diagnosis is often delayed and prognosis poor. The purpose of this study was to perform a retrospective review of all cases of AS over 10 years at a high-volume regional UK referral centre.

METHODS/PATIENTS

We reviewed all cases of AS discussed at the sarcoma multidisciplinary meetings of University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust from September 2013 to August 2023. Demographic and clinicopathologic features at diagnosis, approaches to treatment, and outcomes were compared between four AS subtypes.

RESULTS

A total of 130 cases were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 71 years, with the majority being female (78%). The most common AS subtype was radiation-induced AS (RIAS) (n = 72; 55%), followed by primary cutaneous (n = 28; 22%), primary non-cutaneous (n = 25; 19%), and AS secondary to lymphoedema (n = 5; 4%). Metastases were present at diagnosis in 18% of patients. Treatment was with surgery in the majority of patients (71%). The median survival for the cohort was 30 months (95% CI 20-40), although this differed significantly by AS subtype (p < 0.001), ranging from 5 months in primary non-cutaneous AS to 76 months in RIAS.

CONCLUSION

RIAS is the most common AS subtype, with surgery the only potentially curative treatment modality. Overall prognosis varies significantly by subtype. An international consensus on classification of AS subtypes is required to allow meaningful comparisons across studies and/or a prospective multi-centre registry.

A Population-Based Long-Term Follow-Up of Soft Tissue Angiosarcomas: Characteristics, Treatment Outcomes, and Prognostic Factors

Angiosarcoma is a rare aggressive and understudied soft tissue sarcoma with pending evidence-based treatment guidelines due to varying study cohorts and inconsistent outcome measures. Surgery with wide resection is currently considered to be the cornerstone in management. In a population-based cohort identified from Danish National Health Registers between 2000 and 2017, this study aimed to define prognostic factors in patients with newly diagnosed soft tissue angiosarcoma. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated 5-year overall survival of 28%. Competing risk analysis demonstrated cumulative incidence of local recurrence of 30% and metastasis of 43%. Multivariable Cox models among 154 included patients demonstrated age above 60 years and metastasis to be independently associated with worse overall survival. Cutaneous tumors, surgery, and negative resection margin were independently associated with improved overall survival. Adjuvant oncological treatment did not improve overall survival, risk of metastasis, or recurrence. Negative margin was not associated with lower risk of recurrence and metastasis. We conclude that, despite demonstrated improved survival after surgery with wide resection, overall survival remains poor.

Risk Stratification with Sarculator and MSKCC in Patients with Primary and Secondary Angiosarcoma

BACKGROUND

Sarculator and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomograms are freely available risk prediction scores for surgically treated patients with primary sarcomas. Due to the rarity of angiosarcomas, these scores have only been tested on small cohorts of angiosarcoma patients. In neither the original patient cohort upon which the Sarculator is based nor in subsequent studies was a distinction made between primary and secondary angiosarcomas, as the app is intended to be applied to primary sarcomas. Therefore, the objective of our investigation was to assess whether the Sarculator reveals a difference in prognosis and whether such differentiation aligns with actual clinical data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-one patients with primary or secondary soft tissue angiosarcoma, treated at our Sarcoma Center from 2001 to 2023, were included in the study. Actual survival rates were compared with nomogram-derived data for predicted 5-year survival (Sarculator), as well as 4-, 8- and 12-year sarcoma-specific death probabilities (MSKCC). Harrell's c-index was utilized to assess predictive validity.

RESULTS

In total, 31 patients were analyzed. The actual overall 5-year survival was 22.57% with a predicted 5-year survival rate of 25.97%, and the concordance index was 0.726 for the entire cohort. The concordance index results from MSKCC for angiosarcoma patients were below 0.7 indicating limited predictive accuracy in this cohort, particularly when compared to Sarculator.

SUMMARY

Nomogram-based predictive models are valuable tools in clinical practice for rapidly assessing prognosis. They can streamline the decision-making process for adjuvant treatments and improve patient counselling especially in the treatment of rare and complicated tumor entities such as angiosarcomas.

Cutaneous vascular tumors: an updated review

Cutaneous vascular tumors constitute a heterogeneous group of entities that share overlapping morphologic and immunohistochemical features, which can be diagnostically challenging for pathologists and dermatopathologists. Our understanding and knowledge of vascular neoplasms have improved over time, resulting in both a refinement of their classification by the International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies (ISSVA) and an improvement in the accurate diagnosis and clinical management of vascular neoplasms. This review article aims to summarize the updated clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical characteristics of cutaneous vascular tumors, as well as to highlight their associated genetic mutations. Such entities include infantile hemangioma, congenital hemangioma, tufted angioma, spindle cell hemangioma, epithelioid hemangioma, pyogenic granuloma, Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma, retiform hemangioendothelioma, pseudomyogenic hemangioendothelioma, Kaposi sarcoma, angiosarcoma, and epithelioid hemangioendothelioma.

Treatment of radiation-associated angiosarcoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Radiation-associated angiosarcoma is a cutaneous aggressive tumor that is very rare and it represents a specific entity poorly studied in literature. It requires new therapeutic opportunity.

RECENT FINDINGS

The complete surgical resection with negative margins is the mainstay treatment of localized treatment, even though it is difficult to reach in case of diffuse cutaneous infiltration. Adjuvant re-irradiation may improve local control with no benefit demonstrated on survival. Many systemic treatments can be efficient not only in metastatic setting but also in neoadjuvant setting in case of diffuse presentation. These treatments have never been compared to each other; the most efficient regimen remains to be determined, and a high heterogeneity of treatment is observed, even between sarcoma reference centers.

SUMMARY

Immune therapy represents the most promising treatment under development. At the time of building clinical trial to assess the efficacy of immune therapy, the lack of randomized studies prevents the identification of a strong and consensual reference arm treatment. Given the rarity of the disease, only international collaborative clinical trials may have a chance to include enough patients to draw any conclusion and so will have to counteract the heterogeneity of management.

Prognosis of Patients with Cutaneous Angiosarcoma After Surgical Resection with Curative Intent: Is There a Difference Between the Subtypes?

BACKGROUND

The etiology of cutaneous angiosarcoma (cAS) may be idiopathic (I-cAS), or arise secondary to radiotherapy (RT-cAS), in chronic lymphedema (ST-cAS), or related to UV exposure (UV-cAS). The aim of this study was to evaluate oncological outcomes of different cAS subtypes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Non-metastatic cAS patients, treated with surgery for primary disease with curative intent, were retrospectively analyzed for oncological outcome, including local recurrence (LR), distant metastases (DM), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were identified; 60 I-cAS, 122 RT-cAS, 9 ST-cAS, and 43 UV-cAS. The majority was female (78%), the median age was 66 years (IQR 57-76 years), the median tumor size was 4.4 cm (IQR 2.5-7.0 cm), and most common site of disease was the breast (59%). Recurrence was identified in 66% (44% LR and/or 41% DM), with a median follow up of 26.5 months (IQR 12-60 months). The 5-year OS was estimated at 50%, LRFS at 47%, and DMFS at 50%. There was no significant difference in LR, DM, or OS between the subtypes. Age < 65 years and administration of radiotherapy (RT) were significantly associated with lower LR rates (HR 0.560, 95% CI 0.3373-0.840, p = 0.005 and HR 0.421, 95% CI 0.225-0.790, p = 0.007, respectively), however no prognostic factors were identified for development of DM. Development of DM, but not LR (p = 0.052), was significantly associated with decreased OS (HR 6.486, 95% CI 2.939-14.318 p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We found no significant difference in oncological outcome between the different cAS subtypes. OS remains relatively poor, and RT is associated with lower LR rates.

Prognostic nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with angiosarcoma, a SEER population-based study

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a kind of highly aggressive cancer with high occurrence and mortality rates. This study aimed to establish a comprehensive and validated prognostic nomogram with various clinical indicators in non-metastatic AS patients after surgery. Data of non-metastatic AS patients diagnosed after surgery between 2010 and 2015 was retrieved from the surveillance epidemiology and end results database. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to identify the independent prognostic factors associated with survival to construct the predictive nomogram of 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates. Concordance-index (C-index), calibration plots and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were applied to evaluate the predictive ability of the nomograms. 251 patients in total were divided into the training group (N = 177) and the validation group (N = 74). After the multivariate Cox regression analysis, gender, AJCC stage group 7th ed, T, N stage 7th ed, histologic grade and primary site were statistically identified as independent factors with OS and CSS (P < 0.05). We incorporated the significant factors above and age into nomograms. The C-index of the nomograms for OS and CCS in the training cohort was 0.757 (95%CI 0.697–0.817) and 0.762 (95%CI 0.702–0.822), meanwhile, the C-index of those in the validation cohort was 0.749 (95%CI 0.668–0.830) and 0.756 (95%CI 0.676–0.836) respectively. The results of calibration plots and ROC curve showed the nomograms qualified to measure the risk and prognosis. Our study has developed novel and practical nomograms for predicting prognosis in patients with non-metastatic AS after surgery contributing to cancer management.

Management of Cutaneous Angiosarcoma: an Update Review

OPINION STATEMENT

Cutaneous angiosarcoma is a rare and invasive malignant tumor. For localized cAS patients, wide-margin excision was recommended. Due to the latent local invasion characteristic of cAS, we suggest preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy to nearly all patients. Recently, there is growing interest in using neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy as part of a combination therapy regimen, which may allow some patients to undergo potentially less disabling surgery. For metastatic cAS patients with unresectable tumors and who refuse surgery, radical radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy may be an option. Paclitaxel was recognized as the first-line treatment. For tumors resistant to taxanes, emerging medications such as targeted agents and immunotherapy are also under investigation.

Localized Angiosarcoma, Not One Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Study on Prognosis Depending on the Primary Site and Etiology

BACKGROUND

Angiosarcomas are rare and heterogeneous tumors with poor prognosis. The clinical subtypes are classified depending on the primary site and etiology.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, monocentric study of 136 patients with localized AS between May 1985 and November 2018. Overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. To identify prognostic factors, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed based on Cox regressions.

RESULTS

The median age was 67 years (19-72.8 years). Primary sites were cutaneous (27.2%), breast (38.2%), and deep soft tissue (34.6%). The majority was primary angiosarcomas (55.9%) followed by postradiation (40.4%) and chronic lymphedema angiosarcomas (2.9%). Prognosis significantly differed depending on the primary site and etiology. Shortest median OS and MFS were observed in deep soft tissue angiosarcomas, whereas cutaneous angiosarcomas, angiosarcomas of the breast, and radiation-associated angiosarcomas displayed worse median LRFS. Univariate analyses showed better OS for tumor size <10 cm (p = 0.009), negative surgical margins (p = 0.021), and negative lymph node status (p = 0.007). LRFS and MFS were longer for tumor size <10 cm (p = 0.012 and p = 0.013). In multivariate analyses, age <70 years was the only independent positive prognostic factor for OS in all subgroups. For LRFS, secondary AS of the breast was a negative prognostic factor (HR: 2.35; p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Different behaviors and prognoses depending on the primary site and etiology should be considered for the treatment of this heterogeneous disease. In cutaneous angiosarcomas of the head/neck and postradiation angiosarcomas of the breast, local recurrence seems to have a crucial impact on OS. Therefore, improved local therapies and local tumor staging may have to be implemented. However, in deep soft tissue angiosarcomas, distant recurrence seems to have a major influence on prognosis, which indicates a benefit of additional perioperative chemotherapy.

The treatment landscape of advanced angiosarcoma in Asia-A multi-national collaboration from the Asian Sarcoma Consortium

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare disease with a dismal prognosis. The treatment landscape and prognostic factors for advanced AS, including locally advanced, unresectable, and metastatic disease remain elusive. The Asian Sarcoma Consortium is an international collaborative effort to understand the sarcoma treatment landscape in Asia. We undertook a retrospective chart review of AS patients seen in 8 sarcoma academic centers across Asia. Patients with complete clinical, treatment, and follow-up data were enrolled. Overall, 276 advanced AS patients were included into this study; 84 (30%) of the patients had metachronous metastatic AS. The median age was 67 y; primary sites of AS was cutaneous in 55% and visceral in 45% of patients. In total, 143 (52%) patients received at least 1 line of systemic chemotherapy. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen used was paclitaxel (47.6%) followed by liposomal doxorubicin (19.6%). The median overall survival (OS) was 7.8 mo. Significant prognostic factors for OS included age > 65 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, P = .006), male gender (HR 1.39, P = .02), and a cutaneous primary AS site (HR 0.63, P = .004). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for first-line chemotherapy was 3.4 mo. PFS for single vs combination or paclitaxel vs liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy regimens were comparable. This study provides an insight into the treatment patterns and prognostic factors of advanced AS patients in Asia. Prognosis of advanced AS remains poor. Data from this study serve as a benchmark for future clinical study design.

Concurrent paclitaxel and radiation therapy for the treatment of cutaneous angiosarcoma

•

Cutaneous angiosarcoma has poor outcomes with no standardized treatment regimen.

•

Paclitaxel-based chemoRT (CRT) was compared to other therapies at two US institutions.

•

Similar oncologic outcomes and improved survival with paclitaxel CRT.

•

Paclitaxel CRT + surgery provided best oncologic outcomes and survival.

•

Paclitaxel CRT + surgery regimen now being studied in a prospective phase II trial.

Introduction

We compared clinical outcomes in patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma receiving concurrent paclitaxel-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs. other modalities (Non-CRT).

Materials and methods

Patients with non-metastatic cutaneous angiosarcoma diagnosed from 1998 to 2018 at two institutions were identified. In the CRT cohort, paclitaxel 80 mg/m² weekly was given for up to 12 weeks and patients received radiotherapy (RT) during the final 6 weeks of chemotherapy. The RT dose was 50–50.4 Gy delivered in 1.8–2 Gy per fraction with an optional post-operative boost of 10–16 Gy. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank statistics were used to compare the outcomes between the two groups. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Fifty-seven patients were included: 22 CRT and 35 Non-CRT. The CRT cohort had more patients > 60 years (100% vs. 60%, p < 0.001) and tumors >5 cm (68.2% vs 54.3%, p = 0.023). The median follow-up was 25.8 (1.5–155.2) months. There was no significant difference in 2-year local control (LC), distant control (DC), or progression-free survival (PFS) between the two groups. The 2-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher for the CRT cohort (94.1% vs. 71.6%, p = 0.033). Amongst the subset of patients in the CRT cohort who received trimodality therapy, the 2-year LC, DC, PFS, and OS was 68.6%, 100%, 68.6%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

The use of concurrent paclitaxel CRT demonstrates promising outcomes. Given these results, we are currently evaluating the safety and efficacy of this regimen in prospective, phase 2 trial (NCT 03921008).

Sarcoma of the breast: breast cancer history as etiologic and prognostic factor-A population-based case-control study

Purpose

Sarcomas of the breast account for about 1% of all breast malignancies. The aim of this national survey was to explore etiologic and prognostic factors.

Methods

Utilizing national Swedish registers, all patients registered with mesenchymal tumors in the breast during the period 1993–2013 (n = 344) were identified and compared to up to ten age and gender matched controls. Cancer history was retrieved for cases and controls. Conditional Poisson regression models were used for calculation of odds ratios.

Results

Previous breast cancer was overrepresented among patients with angiosarcoma. The highest risk occurred ≥ 5 years after treatment for breast cancer (OR 73.9, 95% confidence interval, CI, 25.4–215; P < 0.001). An increase in incidence of angiosarcoma was observed during the study period (1.10, 95% CI 1.05–1.16; P < 0.001). The overall incidence of breast sarcoma increased from 1.52 to 2.04 cases per million per year. Angiosarcoma of the breast was associated with a significant excess mortality compared to age-matched controls (HR 4.65, 95% CI 3.01–7.19; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Angiosarcoma increased in incidence and displayed a more severe clinical course, with significantly shorter survival. The strong association between a history of breast cancer 5 years or more prior to the diagnosis of angiosarcoma points to radiotherapy as a contributing factor.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10549-020-05802-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Prognostic Factors in a Large Nationwide Cohort of Histologically Confirmed Primary and Secondary Angiosarcomas

Angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare sarcoma of endothelial origin, arising spontaneously (primary AS) or after external damage such as radiation therapy or UV exposure (secondary AS). To date, reliable assessment of prognostic factors has proven difficult, due to disease rarity and heterogeneity of study cohorts. Although large registries provide relatively large AS patient series, these cases often lack histological confirmation. This study aimed to analyze AS prognostic factors in a large nationwide cohort of histologically confirmed cases, established through linkage of clinical data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and pathology data from the Dutch pathology registry (PALGA). All cases were reviewed by an expert pathologist, showing a 16% discordance rate. Multivariable Cox regression survival analysis among 479 confirmed AS patients revealed remarkably poorer overall survival (OS) for primary AS compared to secondary AS (7 vs 21 months, Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.5; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2–1.9). Age above 65 years, male gender, and no surgical treatment also significantly correlated to worse OS. Overall, OS was relatively poor, with a median of 13 months (95% CI = 10–16 months) and 22% five-year survival rate. With this study, we illustrate AS heterogeneity in clinical behavior and show for the first time better survival for secondary AS compared to primary AS.