1
|
Angrisani A, Bosetti DG, Vogl UM, Castronovo FM, Zilli T. Oligometastatic Urothelial Cancer and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and an Updated Insight of Current Evidence and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3201. [PMID: 39335172 PMCID: PMC11430162 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2024] [Revised: 09/16/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is the most commonly used metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) for oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma (omUC). Despite efforts in defining this disease entity, open questions remain concerning the role of MDT and the use of biomarkers, imaging, and its combination with systemic therapies. The aim of the present systematic review is to provide an updated overview of the current clinical evidence on SBRT for omUC in terms of survival and local control benefits. We also aim to provide updates on controversial areas and future directions in this emerging field. METHODS With a systematic approach, following PRISMA recommendations, we searched two databases to identify and select articles published up until March 2024 reporting the use of SBRT for omUC with or without concomitant systemic therapies. Prospective randomized or non-randomized studies as well as retrospective studies were included. RESULTS Eight studies were selected for data extraction and 293 omUC patients treated with SBRT were collectively analyzed. In metachronous omUC patients, SBRT delivered with ablative doses (BED10 ≥ 78 Gy) was associated with a 2-year overall survival (OS) rate of 50.7% (95% CI 35.1-64.4%). The use of sub-ablative SBRT doses (BED10 = 43.2 Gy) in combination with immunotherapy did not demonstrate significant clinical outcome improvement in two prospective studies. The overall tolerance was good, with only one study reporting toxicity of grade 3 in up to 18% of the patients treated with SBRT in combination with immunotherapy. CONCLUSIONS SBRT is an effective and widely available MDT option in omUC, although this is based on a limited number of studies. Despite the attempt to use SBRT as an immune response trigger in combination with immunotherapy, no significant improvement in survival outcomes has been observed. The integration of new systemic agents with MDT will likely define a new scenario for the treatment of omUC. The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO, ID: CRD42024522381.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Angrisani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Davide Giovanni Bosetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Ursula Maria Vogl
- Medical Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Francesco Mosè Castronovo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, EOC, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Facoltà di Scienze Biomediche, Università della Svizzera Italiana, 6900 Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, 1206 Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu MZ, Li XY, Gao XS, Lyu F, Ma MW, Chen JY, Gao Y, Ren XY, Li XS. Outcomes of Radical Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Localized Renal Pelvic and Ureteral Carcinoma Intolerant to Surgery: A Real-World Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102216. [PMID: 39326156 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 08/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and efficacy of radical radiotherapy for localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma. METHODS 23 patients who received radiotherapy were enrolled. The prescribed dose was 60 to 67.5 Gy in 25 fractions and for bulky tumors, SABR was used in the first 3 to 5 times with tumor center boosted synchronously with 6 to 8 Gy/f. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate local control (LC), DMFS, CSS and OS. Univariate analysis was performed by the log-rank test. The change in the eGFR before and after radiotherapy was compared by paired t test. The side effects were graded by CTCAE, version 5.0. RESULTS The median follow-up time was 17 months. The LC rates at 2 years after radiotherapy were 85.0%; the DMFS rates were 52.2%; the CSS rates were 83.0%; and the OS rates were 77.8%. The main failure mode after radiotherapy was distant metastasis. Univariate analysis revealed that T3-4 stage (P = .001), N+ status (P < .001) and a tumor volume ≥ 20 cc (P = .005) were poor prognostic factors for DMFS. There was no significant difference in the mean eGFR before and after radiotherapy (47.0 mL/min/1.73m2 vs. 48.5 mL/min/1.73m2, P = .632). Only 1 patient developed acute grade 3 anemia. No patients developed grade 3 or higher late toxicities. CONCLUSION For localized inoperable renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma, radiotherapy is well tolerable with high local control and expected to bring survival benefits. In such patients, radiotherapy may be an option when surgery is unsuitable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jia-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Ying Ren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xue-Song Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rizzo M, Soares A, Grande E, Bamias A, Kopp RM, Lenci E, Buttner T, Salah S, Grillone F, de Carvalho IT, Tapia JC, Gucciardino C, Pinto A, Mennitto A, Abahssain H, Rescigno P, Myint Z, Takeshita H, Spinelli GP, Popovic L, Vitale MG, Fiala O, Giannatempo P, Zakopoulou R, Carrozza F, Massari F, Monteiro FSM, Pace MP, Giannini M, Roviello G, Porta C, Battelli N, Kanesvaran R, Santoni M. Radiotherapy plus pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the ARON-2 real-world study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:19802. [PMID: 39187558 PMCID: PMC11347671 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70182-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The addition of metastasis-directed radiotherapy (MDRT) to immunotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) has shown promising results. We report the real-world data from the ARON-2 study (NCT05290038) on the impact of conventional (CRT) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) on the outcome of aUC patients receiving pembrolizumab after platinum-based-chemotherapy. Medical records of 837 patients were reviewed from 60 institutions in 20 countries. Two hundred and sixty-two patients (31%) received radiotherapy (cohort A), of whom 193 (23%) received CRT and 69 (8%) received SBRT. Patients were assessed for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore the association of variables of interest with OS and PFS. With a median follow-up of 22.7 months, the median OS was 10.2 months, 6.8 months and 16.0 months in no RT, CRT and SBRT subgroups (p = 0.005), with an 1y-OS rates of 47%, 34% and 61%, respectively (p < 0.001). The 1y-OS rate in the SBRT subgroup were significantly higher for both lower (63%) and upper tract UC (68%), for pure urothelial histology (63%) and variant histologies (58%), and for patients with bone (40%) and lymph-node metastases (61%). Median PFS was 4.8 months, 9.6 months and 5.8 months in the CRT, SBRT and no RT subgroups, respectively (p = 0.060). The 1y-PFS rate was significantly higher (48%) in the SBRT population and was confirmed in all patient subsets. The difference in terms of ORR was in favour of SBRT. Our real-world analysis showed that the use of SBRT/pembrolizumab combination may play a role in a subset of aUC patients to increase disease control and possibly overall survival.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Humans
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use
- Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage
- Male
- Female
- Aged
- Middle Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use
- Urologic Neoplasms/pathology
- Urologic Neoplasms/mortality
- Urologic Neoplasms/therapy
- Urologic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Radiosurgery/methods
- Retrospective Studies
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/therapy
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/mortality
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Adult
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/therapy
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/pathology
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/mortality
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell/drug therapy
- Treatment Outcome
- Combined Modality Therapy
- Progression-Free Survival
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mimma Rizzo
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico Di Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
| | - Andrey Soares
- Medical Oncology Unit, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
- Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group - LACOG, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - Enrique Grande
- Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aristotelis Bamias
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Ray Manneh Kopp
- Clinical Oncology, Sociedad de Oncología y Hematología del Cesar, Valledupar, Colombia
| | - Edoardo Lenci
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Thomas Buttner
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Bonn (UKB), Bonn, Germany
| | - Samer Salah
- Department of Medical Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Francesco Grillone
- Medical Oncology Unit, Presidio Ospedaliero Pugliese Ciaccio, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria "Renato Dulbecco", Catanzaro, Italy
| | | | - Jose Carlos Tapia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Hospital de La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Alvaro Pinto
- Medical Oncology Department, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alessia Mennitto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria "Maggiore Della Carità", Novara, Italy
| | - Halima Abahssain
- Medicine and Pharmacy Faculty, Medical Oncology Unit, National Institute of Oncology, Mohamed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Pasquale Rescigno
- Centre for Cancer, Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Zin Myint
- Division of Medical Oncology, Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40536-0293, USA
| | - Hideki Takeshita
- Department of Urology, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Saitama, Japan
| | - Gian Paolo Spinelli
- Territorial Oncology Operative Complex Unit - Casa Della Salute di Aprilia - ASL Latina, Latina, Italy
| | - Lazar Popovic
- Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Faculty of Medicine, University Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia
| | - Maria Giuseppa Vitale
- Division of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Ondrej Fiala
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapeutics, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Patrizia Giannatempo
- Genitourinary Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Roubini Zakopoulou
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, Attikon University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Francesco Carrozza
- Oncology Unit, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Department Oncology and Haematology AUSL, Romagna, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Francesco Massari
- Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Giandomenico Roviello
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico Di Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | | | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Matteo Santoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu MZ, Chen JY, Lyu F, Gao XS, Ma MW, Li XY, Li HZ, Qin SB, Gao Y, Wang PY. Exploring Radiotherapy as a Promising Alternative for Managing Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Rescuing Chemotherapy-Intolerant Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102203. [PMID: 39241310 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and effectiveness of radiotherapy for advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients intolerant to chemotherapy. METHODS Data for 21 patients with advanced UTUC intolerant to chemotherapy were retrospectively collected. All patients were treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (50-70 Gy/20-33 f) or partial-SABR boost to the lesions (50-60 Gy/20-25 f with tumor center boosted with 6-8 Gy/f, 3-5 f) for bulky tumors. RESULTS The median age was 75 years (range, 58-87 years). Primary tumor resection was performed for all patients and none underwent metastatic resection. Seventeen (81%) patients had oligometastasis (1-5 metastases) at diagnosis. Eighteen (85.7%) received irradiation to all tumor lesions. Lymph node metastasis was predominant in the whole group (17/21). Other lesions were distributed as local recurrence (7/21), bone metastases (2/21) and abdominal wall/muscle (2/21). The median follow-up time was 38.5 months (interquartile range, 15.2-48.7 months). Rate of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole group at 1 year were 90%, 46.6%, and 80.4%, respectively. At 3 years, LC, PFS and OS were 65.6%, 26.6%, and 40.9%, respectively. Fourteen patients developed acute mild gastrointestinal toxicity, generally of grade 1-2; 8 patients developed acute grade 1-2 hematological toxicity, consisting mainly of anemia and leukopenia. No grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION For patients with advanced UTUC who are not able to tolerate chemotherapy, radiotherapy is a safe treatment and can achieve good local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Zhen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Bin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Pei-Yan Wang
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abufaraj M, Al Karmi J, Bdeir A. Is there a role for metastasis-directed therapy in bladder cancer? Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:273-280. [PMID: 38587010 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article aims to comprehensively review and critique the existing literature on the role of metastatic-directed therapy in patients with metastatic bladder cancer, particularly in oligometastatic disease state. RECENT FINDINGS The role of metastasectomy in metastatic bladder cancer is still controversial. Several studies have demonstrated improved outcomes, particularly in a highly selected patients with small metastatic lesions or with lung or brain metastases, whereas others show no significant survival benefit. Combining metastasectomy with systemic therapies, such as immunotherapy and chemotherapy, has also shown benefits. Metastasis-directed radiotherapy is evolving as a potentially effective approach with minimal toxicity in achieving local control and improving survival, particularly in patients with oligometastatic disease. The evidence regarding the impact of several factors such as performance status, metastatic burden, and the presence of visceral metastases on outcomes is mixed. Concurrent treatment with systemic therapy may potentiate the effectiveness of metastasis-directed therapy. SUMMARY In patients with metastatic deposits amenable to surgical resection, metastasectomy stands as a promising avenue. Metastatic-directed radiotherapy has demonstrated local control and improved survival in the evolving landscape of oligometastatic bladder cancer management. Further, well designed multicenter prospective studies are needed to support these findings and better understand the synergy between radiotherapy and systemic treatments, especially immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital
| | - Joud Al Karmi
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Adan Bdeir
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Svedman FC, Holmsten K, Jawdat F, Hailom W, Alm D, Grozman V, Ullén A. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is beneficial for a subgroup of patients with urothelial cancer and solitary metastatic disease: a single institution real-world experience. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:74. [PMID: 38880908 PMCID: PMC11181669 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02465-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment options for patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) include systemic platinum-based chemotherapy, immunotherapy, antibody-drug-conjugates, and targeted therapy. Oligometastatic disease (OMD) may be an intermediate state between localized and generalized cancer. The best treatment strategy for OMD and oligoprogressive (OPD) disease is poorly studied in mUC but local stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) could be an option to avoid or delay systemic treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of SBRT given in a real-world patient population. METHODS All patients with mUC treated with SBRT at Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden between 2009 and 2022 were included in this study. Baseline clinical characteristics, treatment data, SBRT dosimetry data and treatment outcome were collected retrospectively. The study endpoints were local control rate (LCR), progression-free-survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and feasibility of SBRT. RESULTS In total 39 patients were treated with SBRT. The median follow-up was 25.6 months. The LCR was 82%. PFS and OS were 4.1 and 26.2 months, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated; all patients but one (treatment related pain) completed the planned SBRT. Number of metastases irradiated with SBRT was significantly associated with outcome; patients with only one irradiated lesion had more favourable PFS compared to individuals with 2 or more metastases (HR 4.12, 95% CI: 1.81-9.38, p = 0.001). A subgroup of patients (15%) achieved a sustained long-term survival benefit and never required systemic treatments after SBRT. CONCLUSIONS SBRT was well tolerated and associated with high LCR. A subpopulation of patients with single metastatic lesion achieved long-term OS and never required subsequent systemic treatment after SBRT. Prospective randomized studies are warranted to discover treatment predictive biomarkers and to investigate the role of SBRT in oligometastatic UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernanda Costa Svedman
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden.
| | - Karin Holmsten
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Capio S:t Göran Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Faith Jawdat
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| | - Wehazit Hailom
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| | - Daniel Alm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Vitali Grozman
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology Unit, Theme Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, 171 76, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Liu MA, Li JW, Runcie K. Management of Oligometastatic and Locally Recurrent Urothelial Carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:496-503. [PMID: 38602581 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01523-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize and evaluate the literature on treatment approaches for oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancer. RECENT FINDINGS There is no clear definition for oligometastatic urothelial cancers due to limited data. Studies focusing on oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancer have been primarily retrospective. Treatment options include local therapy with surgery or radiation, and generalized systemic therapy such as chemotherapy or immunotherapy. Oligometastatic and locally recurrent urothelial cancers remain challenging to manage, and treatment requires an interdisciplinary approach. Systemic therapy is nearly always a component of current care in the form of chemotherapy, but the role of immunotherapy has not been explored. Consideration of surgical and radiation options may improve outcomes, and no studies have compared directly between the two localized treatment options. The development of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers may also enhance the treatment landscape in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Liu
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Jennifer W Li
- Department of Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Karie Runcie
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Calleris G, von Deimling M, Kesch C, Soria F, Gontero P, Ploussard G, Laukhtina E, Pradere B. Definitions, outcomes and perspectives for oligometastatic bladder cancer: towards a standardized terminology. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:217-224. [PMID: 38426242 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001170] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Oligometastatic (om) cancer is considered as a transitional state in between locally confined disease and widespread metastases, accessible to a multimodal treatment, combining systemic and local therapy. In urothelial bladder cancer (BCa), the definitions and the approaches to this condition are poorly standardised and mainly based on retrospective data. We aim to portray the framework for uro-oncologic terminology in omBCa and go through the latest evidence and the future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Retrospective and registry data support the potential benefits of multimodality treatment for carefully selected omBCa patients, especially following a good response to systemic treatment. In 2023, a Delphi consensus has defined omBCa, allowing maximum three metastatic lesions, theoretically amenable to radical local treatment. In de-novo omBCa, surgical treatment of primary tumour might improve overall survival (OS), according to a matched registry analysis; also, consolidative radiotherapy was associated with better OS in two recent cohorts. Furthermore, metastasis-directed therapy (MDT) has shown high local control rates and promising OS (14.9-51 months) in a meta-analysis; benefits might be more pronounced for single-site omBCa and nodal or lung lesions. SUMMARY From a clinical perspective, in de-novo omBCa, the local treatment of primary and metastatic sites might improve disease control and survival, in selected patients; in the oligorecurrent setting, MDT achieves good local symptom control with limited side effects; in selected cases, it could convey a survival benefit, too. From a research perspective, well designed prospective evidence is eagerly awaited, based on recently adopted shared definitions for omBCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Polytechnic and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Markus von Deimling
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Department of Urology and West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Guillaume Ploussard
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sargos P, Le Guevelou J, Khalifa J, Albiges L, Azria D, de Crevoisier R, Supiot S, Créhange G, Roubaud G, Chapet O, Pasquier D, Blanchard P, Latorzeff I. The role of radiation therapy for de novo metastatic bladder and renal cancers. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:56-65. [PMID: 37286452 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic bladder and renal cancers account respectively for 2.1% and 1.8% of cancer deaths worldwide. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the management of metastatic disease, by demonstrating considerable improvements in overall survival. However, despite initial sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors for most patients, both bladder and renal cancer are associated with short progression-free survival and overall survival, raising the need for further strategies to improve their efficacy. Combining systemic therapies with local approaches is a longstanding concept in urological oncology, in clinical settings including both oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease. Radiation therapy has been increasingly studied with either cytoreductive, consolidative, ablative or immune boosting purposes, but the long-term impact of this strategy remains unclear. This review intends to address the impact of radiation therapy with either curative or palliative intent, for synchronous de novo metastatic bladder and renal cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France.
| | - J Le Guevelou
- Faculty of Medicine, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Eugène-Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - J Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Claudius-Regaud, Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - L Albiges
- Department of Cancer Medicine, institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - D Azria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut du cancer de Montpellier (ICM), IRCM U1194 Inserm, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - R de Crevoisier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Eugène-Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - S Supiot
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint-Herblain, France; CRCINA CNRS, Nantes, France; Inserm, Nantes, France; Université de Nantes et d'Angers, Nantes, France
| | - G Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - G Roubaud
- Department of Medical Oncology, institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - O Chapet
- Department of Oncology Department, centre hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | - D Pasquier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Oscar-Lambret, Lille, France; Cristal UMR 9189, université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - P Blanchard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, université Paris-Saclay, Oncostat U1018 Inserm, Villejuif, France
| | - I Latorzeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, clinique Pasteur, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ashley S, Choudhury A, Hoskin P, Song Y, Maitre P. Radiotherapy in metastatic bladder cancer. World J Urol 2024; 42:47. [PMID: 38244091 PMCID: PMC10799782 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04744-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To review available and emerging evidence of radiotherapy for symptom management and disease control in metastatic bladder cancer. METHODS A literature search and subsequent cross-referencing were carried out for articles in the PubMed and Scopus databases using terms 'radiotherapy' OR 'palliative radiation therapy' with 'metastatic bladder cancer' OR 'advanced bladder cancer' between 1990 and 2023, excluding articles with no English translation. RESULTS Palliative radiotherapy is an effective and accessible treatment for the alleviation of haematuria and pain due to the primary and metastatic disease. With growing recognition of oligometastatic disease state at diagnosis, response, or progression, radiotherapy can consolidate response by ablating residual or resistant lesions. Experience with other primary cancers supports positive impact of radiotherapy on disease control, quality of life, and survival in oligometastatic stage, without significant adverse effects. Alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors, fibroblast growth receptor inhibitors, and antibody-drug conjugates, the immunomodulatory potential of radiotherapy is being explored in combination with these systemic therapies for metastatic bladder cancer. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy is an effective, safe, and accessible treatment modality for palliation as well as disease control in various clinical settings of metastatic bladder cancer. Its role in oligometastatic stage in combination with systemic therapy is expected to expand with emerging evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Ashley
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Hoskin
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, United Kingdom
| | - YeePei Song
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Priyamvada Maitre
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Ernest Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, India.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Santini D, Banna GL, Buti S, Isella L, Stellato M, Roberto M, Iacovelli R. Navigating the Rapidly Evolving Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma Treatment Landscape: Insights from Italian Experts. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1345-1362. [PMID: 37855848 PMCID: PMC10640402 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01461-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To discuss recent advances in the treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) and how best to incorporate new therapies into clinical practice. RECENT FINDINGS There have been several recent practice-changing phase 2 and 3 trials of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and targeted agents in advanced UC. Based on data from these trials, ICIs can be used as first-line maintenance therapy in patients who do not progress on platinum-based chemotherapy, second-line therapy for those with progression, and first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients with PD-L1 expression; ADCs and targeted agents provide later-line treatment options. Despite substantial progress in the treatment of advanced UC, there are still many uncertainties, including the optimal treatment sequence for novel agents, and reliable predictive biomarkers to aid in treatment selection. There is also an unmet need for effective treatment options in patients unfit for any platinum-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniele Santini
- Medical Oncology A, University of Rome, Policlinico Umberto I, "La Sapienza, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Luigi Banna
- Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust, Portsmouth, PO6 3LY, UK
- Faculty of Science and Health, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, PO1 2UP, UK
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Viale A. Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
- Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Viale A. Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
| | - Luca Isella
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Viale A. Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy
| | - Marco Stellato
- Medical Oncology Department, Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Roberto
- UOC Oncology A, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Science, Policlinico Umberto I, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Iacovelli
- UOC Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bamias A, Stenzl A, Brown SL, Albiges L, Babjuk M, Birtle A, Briganti A, Burger M, Choudhury A, Colecchia M, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Gallucci M, Rivas JG, Huddart R, Junker K, Kroeze S, Loriot Y, Merseburger A, Montironi R, Necchi A, Oing C, Oldenburg J, Ost P, Pinkawa M, Ribal MJ, Rouprêt M, Thoeny H, Zilli T, Hoskin P. Definition and Diagnosis of Oligometastatic Bladder Cancer: A Delphi Consensus Study Endorsed by the European Association of Urology, European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology, and European Society of Medical Oncology Genitourinary Faculty. Eur Urol 2023; 84:381-389. [PMID: 37217391 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Revised: 04/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In contrast to other cancers, the concept of oligometastatic disease (OMD) has not been investigated in bladder cancer (BC). OBJECTIVE To develop an acceptable definition, classification, and staging recommendations for oligometastatic BC (OMBC) spanning the issues of patient selection and the roles of systemic therapy and ablative local therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A European consensus group of 29 experts, led by the European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO), and including members from all other relevant European societies, was established. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS A modified Delphi method was used. A systematic review was used to build consensus questions. Consensus statements were extracted from two consecutive surveys. The statements were formulated during two consensus meetings. Agreement levels were measured to determine if consensus was achieved (≥75% agreement). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The first survey included 14 questions and the second survey had 12. Owing to a considerable lack of evidence, which was the major limitation, definition was limited in the context of de novo OMBC, which was further classified as synchronous OMD, oligorecurrence, and oligoprogression. A maximum of three metastatic sites, all resectable or amenable to stereotactic therapy, was proposed as the definition of OMBC. Pelvic lymph nodes represented the only "organ" not included in the definition of OMBC. For staging, no consensus on the role of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography was reached. A favourable response to systemic treatment was proposed as the criterion for selection of patients for metastasis-directed therapy. CONCLUSIONS A consensus statement on the definition and staging of OMBC has been formulated. This statement will help to standardise inclusion criteria in future trials, potentiate research on aspects of OMBC for which consensus was not achieved, and hopefully will lead to the development of guidelines on optimal management of OMBC. PATIENT SUMMARY As an intermediate state between localised cancer and disease with extensive metastasis, oligometastatic bladder cancer (OMBC) might benefit from a combination of systemic treatment and local therapy. We report the first consensus statements on OMBC drawn up by an international expert group. These statements can provide a basis for standardisation of future research, which will lead to high-quality evidence in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotelis Bamias
- National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Chaidari, Greece.
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- University of Tübingen Medical Center, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | | | - Marko Babjuk
- 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Praha, Czechia
| | - Alison Birtle
- Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maximilian Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Maurizio Colecchia
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria De Santis
- Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Valérie Fonteyne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Juan Gómez Rivas
- Department of Urology. Hospital Clinico San Carlos. Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Kerstin Junker
- Klinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Abteilung für Klinisch-Experimentelle Forschung, Homburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Axel Merseburger
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Oing
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Network, Wilrijk, Belgium; Department of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Michael Pinkawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MediClin Robert Janker Klinik, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maria J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Harriet Thoeny
- Department of Radiology, HFR Fribourg-Hôpital Cantonal, University of Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Clinica di Radio-Oncologia, Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bamias A, Stenzl A, Zagouri F, Andrikopoulou A, Hoskin P. Defining Oligometastatic Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 55:28-37. [PMID: 37662704 PMCID: PMC10468799 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Context Unlike other cancers, the concept of oligometastatic disease (OMD) in bladder cancer (BC) has not been systematically investigated. There is therefore a need to develop universally accepted definitions and guidelines for the management of oligometastatic BC (OMBC). Objective To conduct a systematic review to assist a European consensus group in producing a definition of OMBC and to provide recommendations on staging and local therapies. Evidence acquisition The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement was followed. Abstracts for articles focused on BC that addressed the issue of OMBC and provided a definition of oligometastatic status were selected. We collected data on the number of metastases, the number of metastases per organ, the number of organs involved, and metastatic sites that were excluded. Evidence synthesis Sixteen eligible articles were retrieved (9 retrospective series involving 330 patients, 4 reviews, 1 consensus statement, 1 guideline paper, and 1 ongoing prospective phase 2 trial). A maximum of three to five metastatic lesions were compatible with the definition of OMBC. The number of organs involved and lesion size were not universally included in the OMBC definitions. OMD categories studied included synchronous OMBC, oligorecurrence, and oligoprogression. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography was used in addition to conventional imaging for OMD detection. Surgery and radiotherapy were both used. Systemic chemotherapy was also used in all studies. Conclusions There is little information on OMBC in the literature. Our systematic review revealed that only three to five metastatic sites amenable to surgery or radiotherapy that respond to systemic therapy is the setting most frequently chosen for a combination of systemic treatment and metastases-directed therapy. This setting could represent a basis for future prospective studies on OMBC. Patient summary Oligometastatic bladder cancer is a disease state in which favorable outcomes can be expected after a treatment combination of systemic therapy, plus surgery and/or radiotherapy for sites of bladder cancer metastasis. Our systematic review showed a lack of meaningful evidence to define this disease state. There is an urgent need to develop organized research in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aristotelis Bamias
- Second Propaedeutic Department of Internal Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University Hospital, Athens, Greece
- Hellenic GU Cancer Group, Athens, Greece
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Flora Zagouri
- Hellenic GU Cancer Group, Athens, Greece
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Angeliki Andrikopoulou
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Peter Hoskin
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bertucci A, Cartier L, Rollet A, Boustany R, Hilgers W. Retrospective Analysis of a Cohort of Patients with Metastatic Bladder Cancer with Metastatic Sites Limited to the Pelvis and Retroperitoneum Treated at a Single Institution between 2009 and 2020. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:2069. [PMID: 37046728 PMCID: PMC10093406 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15072069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 03/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Bladder cancer (BC) presenting with pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph nodes presents a therapeutic challenge. The impact of chemoradiotherapy on pelvic and retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis as a consolidation treatment has not been established. Between 2009 and 2020, 502 patients who were treated with first-line chemotherapy for BC in our center, were retrospectively identified. Patients who received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy with an equivalent radiation dose superior to 30 Gy were included in the RTCT group, and other patients were included in the control group (CT group). We performed an analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for these two cohorts using the Kaplan-Meier method. A total of 89 patients were included, 24 in the RTCT group and 65 in the CT group. Chemoradiotherapy improved both OS (p = 0.034) and PFS (p = 0.009) in comparison with chemotherapy alone: 26.3 months (95% IC 0.0-52.9) and 19.4 months (95% IC 5.0-33.7), respectively, in the RTCT group versus 17.2 months (95% IC 13.7-20.6) and 11.2 months (95% IC 8.6-13.8), respectively, in the CT group. Grade 3/4 toxicity was related to chemotherapy and to chemoradiotherapy at levels of 31% and 24%, respectively. For mBC with metastatic regional or retroperitoneal lymph nodes, chemoradiotherapy seems to confer benefits for both OS and PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Bertucci
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sainte Catherine Cancer Institute, 84918 Avignon, France
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, INSERM, CNRS, CRCM, Aix-Marseille University, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Lysian Cartier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sainte Catherine Cancer Institute, 84918 Avignon, France
| | - Armelle Rollet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sainte Catherine Cancer Institute, 84918 Avignon, France
| | - Rania Boustany
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sainte Catherine Cancer Institute, 84918 Avignon, France
| | - Werner Hilgers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sainte Catherine Cancer Institute, 84918 Avignon, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aboudaram A, Chaltiel L, Pouessel D, Graff-Cailleaud P, Benziane-Ouaritini N, Sargos P, Schick U, Créhange G, Cohen-Jonathan Moyal E, Chevreau C, Khalifa J. Consolidative Radiotherapy for Metastatic Urothelial Bladder Cancer Patients with No Progression and with No More than Five Residual Metastatic Lesions Following First-Line Systemic Therapy: A Retrospective Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041161. [PMID: 36831503 PMCID: PMC9954747 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Local consolidative radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic malignancies has shown promising results in several types of tumors. The objective of this study was to assess consolidative radiotherapy to the bladder and to residual metastases in metastatic urothelial bladder cancer with no progression following first-line systemic therapy. MATERIALS/METHODS Patients who received first-line therapy for the treatment of metastatic urothelial bladder cancer (mUBC) and who were progression-free following treatment with no more than five residual metastases were retrospectively identified through the database of four Comprehensive Cancer Centers, between January 2005 and December 2018. Among them, patients who received subsequent definitive radiotherapy (of EQD2Gy > 45Gy) to the bladder and residual metastases were included in the consolidative group (irradiated (IR) group), and the other patients were included in the observation group (NIR group). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were determined from the start of the first-line chemotherapy using the Kaplan-Meier method. To prevent immortal time bias, a Cox model with time-dependent covariates and 6-month landmark analyses were performed to examine OS and PFS. RESULTS A total of 91 patients with at least stable disease following first-line therapy and with no more than five residual metastases were analyzed: 51 in the IR group and 40 in the NIR group. Metachronous metastatic disease was more frequent in the NIR group (19% vs. 5%, p = 0.02); the median number of metastases in the IR group vs. in the NIR group was 2 (1-9) vs. 3 (1-5) (p = 0.04) at metastatic presentation, and 1 (0-5) vs. 2 (0-5) (p = 0.18) after completion of chemotherapy (residual lesions), respectively. Two grade 3 toxicities (3.9%) and no grade 4 toxicity were reported in the IR group related to radiotherapy. With a median follow up of 85.9 months (95% IC (36.7; 101.6)), median OS and PFS were 21.7 months (95% IC (17.1; 29.7)) and 11.1 months (95% IC (9.9; 14.1)) for the whole cohort, respectively. In multivariable analysis, consolidative radiotherapy conferred a benefit in both PFS (HR = 0.49, p = 0.007) and OS (HR = 0.47, p = 0.015) in the whole population; in the landmark analysis at 6 months, radiotherapy was associated with improved OS (HR = 0.48, p = 0.026), with a trend for PFS (HR = 0.57, p = 0.082). CONCLUSION Consolidative radiotherapy for mUBC patients who have not progressed after first-line therapy and with limited residual disease seems to confer both OS and PFS benefits. The role of consolidative radiotherapy in the context of avelumab maintenance should be addressed prospectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amélie Aboudaram
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse—Oncopole, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Léonor Chaltiel
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse—Oncopole, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Damien Pouessel
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse—Oncopole, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | | | | | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonié, 33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Ulrike Schick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, CHU Brest, 29200 Brest, France
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France
| | - Elizabeth Cohen-Jonathan Moyal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse—Oncopole, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Christine Chevreau
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse—Oncopole, 31059 Toulouse, France
| | - Jonathan Khalifa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse—Oncopole, 31000 Toulouse, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-5-31-15-54-01
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Oligoprogression of Solid Tumors on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Impact of Local Ablative Radiation Therapy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10102481. [PMID: 36289743 PMCID: PMC9599608 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10102481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 10/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The breakthrough of a limited number of clones while on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), known as oligoprogression, has been previously described. The benefit of ablative radiation therapy (RT) directed at these clones, as opposed to changing systemic therapy, is unclear. We analyzed 30 patients with advanced solid tumors, the majority of whom (23/30, 86.7%) had either hepatocellular or urothelial carcinoma, who experienced oligoprogression on ICIs and were referred for RT. In this study, oligoprogression was defined as having experienced progression at three or fewer metastatic sites outside of the brain after achieving at least stable disease on ICIs for a minimum of three months. The median time to oligoprogression was 11.1 months from the initiation of immunotherapy. 24 patients had one oligoprogressive lesion and six had two. The median radiation dose delivered was 4650 cGy in a median of five fractions. The median progression-free survival (PFS) after RT was 7.1 months, and the time to oligoprogression was not a significant predictor of PFS2. 26 patients continued on ICIs after RT. While 17 patients subsequently progressed, 15 did so at three or fewer metastatic sites and could have theoretically stood to benefit from an additional course of salvage RT to further extend the lifespan of their ICIs. Overall survival at 6, 12, and 24 months was 100.0%, 96.3%, and 82.8%, respectively. These results suggest that RT may provide a PFS benefit and extend the lifespan of ICIs in patients who experience oligoprogression. Regardless of PFS, however, overall survival in this population appears to be excellent.
Collapse
|
17
|
Longo N, Celentano G, Napolitano L, La Rocca R, Capece M, Califano G, Collà Ruvolo C, Mangiapia F, Fusco F, Morra S, Turco C, Di Bello F, Fusco GM, Cirillo L, Cacciapuoti C, Spirito L, Calogero A, Sica A, Sagnelli C, Creta M. Metastasis-Directed Radiation Therapy with Consolidative Intent for Oligometastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2373. [PMID: 35625979 PMCID: PMC9139743 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Revised: 05/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of patients with oligometastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) represents an evolving field in uro-oncology, and the role of metastasis-directed therapies, including metastasectomy and metastasis-directed radiation therapy (MDRT), is gaining increasing attention. Herein, we summarize available evidence about the role of MDRT with consolidative intent in oligometastatic UC patients. A systematic review was performed in December 2021. Six studies involving 158 patients were identified. Most patients (n = 120, 90.2%) had a history of bladder cancer and the most frequent sites of metastases were lymph nodes (n = 61, 52.1%) followed by the lungs (n = 34, 29%). Overall, 144 metastases were treated with MDRT. Median follow-up ranged from 17.2 to 25 months. Local control rates ranged from 57% to 100%. Median Overall Survival (OS) ranged from 14.9 to 51.0 months and median progression-free survival ranged from 2.9 to 10.1 months. Rates of OS at one and two years ranged from 78.9% to 96% and from 26% to 63%, respectively. Treatment-related toxicity was recorded in few patients and in most cases a low-grade toxicity was evident. MDRT with consolidative intent represents a potential treatment option for selected patients with oligometastatic UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Marco Capece
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Francesco Mangiapia
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Ferdinando Fusco
- Department of Woman, Child and General, Specialized Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.F.); (L.S.)
| | - Simone Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Carmine Turco
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Giovanni Maria Fusco
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Crescenzo Cacciapuoti
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Department of Woman, Child and General, Specialized Surgery, Urology Unit, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (F.F.); (L.S.)
| | - Armando Calogero
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Va Pansini, 5, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Antonello Sica
- Department of Precision Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Caterina Sagnelli
- Department of Mental Health and Public Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Largo Madonna delle Grazie n. 1, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy; (N.L.); (G.C.); (R.L.R.); (M.C.); (G.C.); (C.C.R.); (F.M.); (S.M.); (C.T.); (F.D.B.); (G.M.F.); (L.C.); (C.C.); (M.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gu CY, Wang JJ, Zhang HL, Shi GH, Ye DW. Survival in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients Treated With Sunitinib With or Without Cryoablation. Front Oncol 2021; 11:762547. [PMID: 34746004 PMCID: PMC8565618 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.762547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) has emerged as an alternative to extirpative management of small renal masses in select patients. In recent years, the use of targeted therapies has become mainstream, while the role of PCA in treating primary tumor is not well established among patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We sought to evaluate how mRCC patients react to PCA in combination with sunitinib. Methods We retrospectively identified patients with mRCC (primary tumor diameter ≤ 7 cm) treated with sunitinib between 2013 and 2019. These patients were categorized by initial treatment (cryoablation followed by sunitinib versus sunitinib only). Oncological outcomes and rate of adverse events were compared. Results Of the 178 patients analyzed, 65 underwent PCA prior to sunitinib. The median overall survival (OS) in the PCA-sunitinib group was 31.7 months (95% CI; 26.1-37.3), better than the sunitinib-only group, which reported a median OS of 19.8 months (95% CI; 17.1-22.4) (p < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in patients treated with PCA-sunitinib versus sunitinib alone was 13.8 months (95% CI; 10.0-17.6) versus 7.2 months (95% CI: 6.1-8.3) (p < 0.005). No significant differences in adverse events were observed (p > 0.05). Conclusions PCA combined with sunitinib is associated with better survival outcomes than sunitinib alone in patients with mRCC. Careful patient selection remains warranted. These results should inform future prospective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Yuan Gu
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jun-Jie Wang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hai-Liang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guo-Hai Shi
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ding-Wei Ye
- Department of Urology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China.,Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
De B, Venkatesan AM, Msaouel P, Ghia AJ, Li J, Yeboa DN, Nguyen QN, Bishop AJ, Jonasch E, Shah AY, Campbell MT, Wang J, Zurita-Saavedra AJ, Karam JA, Wood CG, Matin SF, Tannir NM, Tang C. Definitive radiotherapy for extracranial oligoprogressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma as a strategy to defer systemic therapy escalation. BJU Int 2021; 129:610-620. [PMID: 34228889 PMCID: PMC10097479 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study whether delivering definitive radiotherapy (RT) to sites of oligoprogression in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) enabled deferral of systemic therapy (ST) changes without compromising disease control or survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS We identified patients with mRCC who received RT to three or fewer sites of extracranial progressive disease between 2014 and 2019 at a large tertiary cancer centre. Inclusion criteria were: (1) controlled disease for ≥3 months before oligoprogression, (2) all oligoprogression sites treated with a biologically effective dose of ≥100 Gy, and (3) availability of follow-up imaging. Time-to-event end-points were calculated from the start of RT. RESULTS A total of 72 patients were identified (median follow-up 22 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 19-32 months), with oligoprogressive lesions in lung/mediastinum (n = 35), spine (n = 30), and non-spine bone (n = 5). The most common systemic therapies before oligoprogression were none (n = 33), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n = 23), and immunotherapy (n = 13). At 1 year, the local control rate was 96% (95% CI 87-99%); progression-free survival (PFS), 52% (95% CI 40-63%); and overall survival, 91% (95% CI 82-96%). At oligoprogression, ST was escalated (n = 16), maintained (n = 49), or discontinued (n = 7), with corresponding median (95% CI) PFS intervals of 19.7 (8.2-27.2) months, 10.1 (6.9-13.2) months, and 9.8 (2.4-28.9) months, respectively. Of the 49 patients maintained on the same ST at oligoprogression, 21 did not subsequently have ST escalation. CONCLUSION Patients with oligoprogressive mRCC treated with RT had comparable PFS regardless of ST strategy, suggesting that RT may be a viable approach for delaying ST escalation. Randomised controlled trials comparing treatment of oligoprogression with RT vs ST alone are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian De
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Aradhana M Venkatesan
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Pavlos Msaouel
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Eric Jonasch
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amishi Y Shah
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Matthew T Campbell
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer Wang
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amado J Zurita-Saavedra
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jose A Karam
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Christopher G Wood
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nizar M Tannir
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chad Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|