Measures to eradicate multidrug-resistant organism outbreaks: how much do they cost?

Nurses' satisfaction with an educational web application to prevent transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms

Multidrug-resistant organism infections are a serious health problem globally, and can result in patient mortality and morbidity. In this descriptive study, we produced the first web application for transmission prevention specific to the situation based on nursing experience, knowledge, and practice guidelines and to evaluate web application satisfaction among Thai nurses. The sample comprised 282 Thai registered nurses experienced in caring for patients with multidrug-resistant organisms in a tertiary hospital. A demographic form and knowledge test were completed anonymously online. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The application emphasized crucial topics for which participants had low preliminary knowledge and included tutorial sessions, pictures, video clips, drills, and a post-test. The application was piloted with a random sample of 30 nurses, and an instrument tested their satisfaction with this. Results revealed that preliminary knowledge scores for preventing transmission were moderate, and participants were highly satisfied with the application. Findings suggest the application is suitable for Thai nurses and could be applied to nursing practice elsewhere. However, further testing is recommended before implementing it into nursing practice.

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium: impact of ending screening and isolation in a Danish University hospital

BACKGROUND

Substantial resources are used in hospitals worldwide to counteract the ever-increasing incidence of vancomycin-resistant and vancomycin-variable Enterococcus faecium (VREfm and VVEfm), but it is important to balance patient safety, infection prevention, and hospital costs.

AIM

To investigate the impact of ending VREfm/VVEfm screening and isolation at Odense University Hospital (OUH), Denmark, on patient and clinical characteristics, risk of bacteraemia, and mortality of VREfm/VVEfm disease at OUH. The burden of VREfm/VVEfm bacteraemia at OUH and the three collaborative hospitals in the Region of Southern Denmark (RSD) was also investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted including first-time VREfm/VVEfm clinical isolates (index isolates) detected at OUH and collaborative hospitals in the period 2015-2022. The intervention period with screening and isolation was from 2015 to 2021, and the post-intervention period was 2022. Information about clinical isolates was retrieved from microbiological databases. Patient data were obtained from hospital records.

FINDINGS

At OUH, 436 patients were included in the study, with 285 in the intervention period and 151 in the post-intervention period. Ending screening and isolation was followed by an increased number of index isolates. Besides a change in van genes, only minor non-significant changes were detected in all the other investigated parameters. Mortality within 30 days did not reflect the VREfm/VVEfm-attributable deaths, and in only four cases was VREfm/VVEfm infection the likely cause of death.

CONCLUSION

Despite an increasing number of index isolates, nothing in the short follow-up period supported a reintroduction of screening and isolation.

Model-based evaluation of admission screening strategies for the detection and control of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in the English hospital setting

BACKGROUND

Globally, detections of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) colonisations and infections are increasing. The spread of these highly resistant bacteria poses a serious threat to public health. However, understanding of CPE transmission and evidence on effectiveness of control measures is severely lacking. This paper provides evidence to inform effective admission screening protocols, which could be important in controlling nosocomial CPE transmission.

METHODS

CPE transmission within an English hospital setting was simulated with a data-driven individual-based mathematical model. This model was used to evaluate the ability of the 2016 England CPE screening recommendations, and of potential alternative protocols, to identify patients with CPE-colonisation on admission (including those colonised during previous stays or from elsewhere). The model included nosocomial transmission from colonised and infected patients, as well as environmental contamination. Model parameters were estimated using primary data where possible, including estimation of transmission using detailed epidemiological data within a Bayesian framework. Separate models were parameterised to represent hospitals in English areas with low and high CPE risk (based on prevalence).

RESULTS

The proportion of truly colonised admissions which met the 2016 screening criteria was 43% in low-prevalence and 54% in high-prevalence areas respectively. Selection of CPE carriers for screening was improved in low-prevalence areas by adding readmission as a screening criterion, which doubled how many colonised admissions were selected. A minority of CPE carriers were confirmed as CPE positive during their hospital stay (10 and 14% in low- and high-prevalence areas); switching to a faster screening test pathway with a single-swab test (rather than three swab regimen) increased the overall positive predictive value with negligible reduction in negative predictive value.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a novel within-hospital CPE transmission model, this study assesses CPE admission screening protocols, across the range of CPE prevalence observed in England. It identifies protocol changes-adding readmissions to screening criteria and a single-swab test pathway-which could detect similar numbers of CPE carriers (or twice as many in low CPE prevalence areas), but faster, and hence with lower demand on pre-emptive infection-control resources. Study findings can inform interventions to control this emerging threat, although further work is required to understand within-hospital transmission sources.

Investigating Resistance to Carbapenems in Enterobacterales: A Descriptive Epidemiological Study of 2021 Screening in an Italian Teaching Hospital

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a growing threat to global healthcare. This descriptive epidemiological study investigates the prevalence and characteristics of Enterobacterales with AMR factors in a tertiary teaching hospital in Italy over the course of the year 2021. In 2021, the prevalence of colonisation by Enterobacterales with AMR factors in patients was 1.08%. During the observation period, a total of 8834 rectal swabs were performed, with 1453 testing positive. A total of 5639 rectal swabs were performed according to a hospital procedure for the active screening of MDRO colonisation at the time of admission. Of these, 679 were positive for microorganisms under surveillance, and 74 patients were colonised with Enterobacterales, predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli. Antibiotic resistance factors were observed in 61 of these 74 patients (82.43%) of these patients, with NDM and KPC being the most frequent resistance factors. A statistically significant trend in positive swabs was observed across different ward categories (surgery, ICUs, and medical wards). Regarding specific trends, the rate of positive admission screening in medical and surgical wards was higher than in ICU wards. The results highlight the ease with which Enterobacterales develops resistance across different ward categories. The findings underscore the need for adjusted screening protocols and tailored infection prevention strategies in various care settings.

Using Protein Fingerprinting for Identifying and Discriminating Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Inpatient and Outpatient Clinics

In hospitals and other clinical settings, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a particularly dangerous pathogen that can cause serious or even fatal infections. Thus, the detection and differentiation of MRSA has become an urgent matter in order to provide appropriate treatment and timely intervention in infection control. To ensure this, laboratories must have access to the most up-to-date testing methods and technology available. This study was conducted to determine whether protein fingerprinting technology could be used to identify and distinguish MRSA recovered from both inpatients and outpatients. A total of 326 S. aureus isolates were obtained from 2800 in- and outpatient samples collected from King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from October 2018 to March 2021. For the phenotypic identification of 326 probable S. aureus cultures, microscopic analysis, Gram staining, a tube coagulase test, a Staph ID 32 API system, and a Vitek 2 Compact system were used. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), referred to as protein fingerprinting, was performed on each bacterial isolate to determine its proteomic composition. As part of the analysis, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and a single-peak analysis of MALDI-TOF MS software were also used to distinguish between Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and MRSA. According to the results, S. aureus isolates constituted 326 out of 2800 (11.64%) based on the culture technique. The Staph ID 32 API system and Vitek 2 Compact System were able to correctly identify 262 (80.7%) and 281 (86.2%) S. aureus strains, respectively. Based on the Oxacillin Disc Diffusion Method, 197 (62.23%) of 326 isolates of S. aureus exhibited a cefoxitin inhibition zone of less than 21 mm and an oxacillin inhibition zone of less than 10 mm, and were classified as MRSA under Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. MALDI-TOF MS was able to correctly identify 100% of all S. aureus isolates with a score value equal to or greater than 2.00. In addition, a close relationship was found between S. aureus isolates and higher peak intensities in the mass ranges of 3990 Da, 4120 Da, and 5850 Da, which were found in MRSA isolates but absent in MSSA isolates. Therefore, protein fingerprinting has the potential to be used in clinical settings to rapidly detect and differentiate MRSA isolates, allowing for more targeted treatments and improved patient outcomes.

Infection prevention and control policies in hospitals and prevalence of highly resistant microorganisms: an international comparative study

BACKGROUND

There are differences in infection prevention and control (IPC) policies to prevent transmission of highly resistant microorganisms (HRMO). The aim of this study is to give an overview of the IPC policy of six European hospitals and their HRMO prevalence, to compare the IPC policies of these hospitals with international guidelines, and to investigate the hospitals' adherence to their own IPC policy.

METHODS

The participating hospitals were located in Salzburg (Austria), Vienna (Austria), Kayseri (Turkey), Piraeus (Greece), Rome (Italy) and Rotterdam (The Netherlands). Data were collected via an online survey. Questions were aimed at prevalence rates in the years 2014, 2015, 2016 of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPK), carbapenemase-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CPPA), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) and hospitals' IPC policies of 2017. Implemented IPC measures (i.e. with a self-reported adherence of > 90%) were counted (26 points maximal).

RESULTS

The self-reported prevalence of CPK per year was low in the Austrian and Dutch hospitals and high in the Turkish and Greek hospitals. CPPA was highly prevalent in the Turkish hospital only, while the prevalence of VRE in four hospitals, except the Austrian hospitals which reported lower prevalence numbers, was more evenly distributed. The Dutch hospital had implemented the most IPC measures (n = 21), the Turkish and Greek hospitals the least (n = 14 and 7, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Hospitals with the highest self-reported prevalence of CPK and CPPA reported the least implemented IPC measures. Also, hospitals with a higher prevalence often reported a lower adherence to own IPC policy.

Outbreak of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae at a Portuguese university hospital: Epidemiological characterization and containment measures

Background

KPC-producing K pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) is a public health problem with important clinical and epidemiological implications. We describe an outbreak of KPC-Kp at vascular surgery and neurosurgery wards in a central hospital in Porto, Portugal.

Methods

A case of KPC-Kp was considered to be a patient positive for KPC-Kp with strong epidemiological plausibility of having acquired this microorganism in the affected wards and/or with genetic relationship ≥92% between KPC-Kp isolates. Active surveillance cultures (ASCs) and real-time polymerase chain reaction were used for the detection of carbapenemase genes through rectal swab in a selected population. Molecular analysis was performed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis at the National Reference Laboratory. Patient risk factors were collected from the electronic medical record system. Information regarding outbreak containment strategy was collected from the Infection Control Unit records.

Results

Of the 16 cases, 11 (69%) were identified through active screening, representing 1.4% of the total 766 ASCs collected. The most frequent risk factors identified were previous admission (63%), antibiotic exposure in the past 6 months (50%), and immunodepression (44%). The length of stay until KPC-Kp detection was high (0-121 days, mean 35.6), as was the total length of stay (5-173 days, mean 56.6). Three patients (19%) were infected by KPC-Kp, 2 of whom died. One previously colonized patient died later because of KPC-Kp infection.

Conclusions

Multifactorial strategy based on contact precautions (with patient and healthcare professional cohorts) and ASC, as well as Antibiotic Stewardship Program reinforcement, allowed to contain this KPC-Kp outbreak.

Economic impact of an outbreak of carbapenemase producing-Enterobacteriaceae in a surgical intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

A 15-month outbreak of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) occurred in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of our institution. We aimed to estimate the financial impact of this outbreak from the perspective of the French public health insurance system.

METHODS

The characteristics of the colonised/infected CPE patients and outbreak management according to French national guidelines were prospectively collected. Loss of productivity was assessed in terms of the reduction in total number of admissions (TNA) and discharges and in ICU length of stay (LoS). The additional financial burden associated with this outbreak was estimated by the accounting department of the hospital, including the impact of the extended LoS and restricted admissions.

RESULTS

Sixteen CPE patients (19 stays) were hospitalised in the SICU (10/2016-01/2018). The median ICU LoS for the CPE cases was 17 [8-36] days versus 6.5 and 6.1 days in 2016 and 2017, respectively, for the whole SICU population. The total number of lost bed days during the outbreak was 452. The TNA dropped dramatically in 2017 (decrease of 20.6%). The estimated costs were 768,386 EUR for bed days lost; 297,176 EUR and 63,675 EUR for the extended LoS for the CPE cases and the patients on contact precautions, respectively; 34,045 EUR for staff reinforcements; 85,764 EUR for bacteriological screening tests; and 42,857 EUR for antimicrobial treatment. The total financial burden of the outbreak was 1,291,903 EUR.

CONCLUSION

Management of a CPE outbreak in the SICU is associated with a huge financial burden for the unit and for the institution.

A Nomogram With Six Variables Is Useful to Predict the Risk of Acquiring Carbapenem-Resistant Microorganism Infection in ICU Patients

Background

Carbapenem-resistant microorganism (CRO) transmission in the medical setting confers a global threat to public health. However, there is no established risk prediction model for infection due to CRO in ICU patients. This study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict the risk of acquiring CRO infection in patients with the first ICU admission and to determine the length of ICU stay (ICU-LOS) and 28-day survival.

Methods

Patient data were retrieved from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV) database based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A CRO was defined as a bacterium isolated from any humoral microbial culture that showed insensitivity or resistance to carbapenems. The characteristics of CRO and non-CRO patients in the first ICU admission were compared. Propensity score matching was applied to balance the differences between the CRO and non-CRO cohorts. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed to determine the 28-day survival rate and ICU-LOS. Furthermore, after randomization of the CRO cohort into the training and validation sets, a predictive nomogram was constructed based on LASSO regression and Logistic regression analysis, and its performance was verified by internal validation.

Results

Overall, 4531 patients who had first ICU admission as recorded in MIMIC-IV were enrolled, 183 (4.04%) of whom were diagnosed with CRO infection. Moreover, CRO infection was independently associated with 28-day survival and ICU-LOS in ICU patients. Parameters eligible for inclusion in this nomogram were male sex, hemoglobin-min, temperature-max, use of a peripherally inserted central catheter line, dialysis treatment, and use of carbapenems. This nomogram showed a better performance as indicated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.776 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.667-0.750) and 0.723 (95% CI 0.556-0.855) in the training and validation sets, respectively, in terms of predicting the risk of acquiring CRO infection.

Conclusions

CRO infection was independently associated with ICU-LOS and 28-day survival in patients with first ICU admission. The nomogram showed the best prediction of the risk of acquiring CRO infection in ICU patients. Based on the nomogram-based scoring, we can management the risk factors and guide individualized prevention and control of CRO.

Prevention and control of highly antibiotic-resistant bacteria in a Pacific territory: Feedback from New Caledonia between 2004 and 2020

OBJECTIVE

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and Enterococcus faecium resistant to vancomycin (VRE) constitute major threats to public health worldwide. The Pacific area is concerned and has implemented strategies to control antimicrobial resistance (AMR). However, accurate epidemiological data are rarely reported. Our study aimed to present the strategies applied to prevent and control the spread of highly resistant bacteria in the Pacific territory of New Caledonia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cohort prospective study of all cases of highly resistant bacteria (HRB) isolated in New Caledonia from September 2004 to December 2020. Evaluation of the impact of the infection control measures implemented in healthcare settings: screening strategy, cohorting unit, IT tools and control of antibiotic prescriptions.

RESULTS

A total of 346 patients with HRB were identified. Most of them (63.0%) were infected or colonized by VRE (n=218) and 128 by CRE. While the number of CREs significantly increased from 2013 to 2020 (P<0.0001), control procedures have limited their dissemination. Most patients were colonized by IMP-4-CRE (n=124/128). The incidence density of VRE significantly decreased from 38.52 for 100,000 hospitalisation-days in 2015 to 4.19 for 100,000 hospitalisation-days in 2019 due to systematic screening of patients before sanitary repatriation from Australia and cohorting implementation. The risk of VRE diffusion is now well under control.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that it is possible to control the spread of AMR in a circumscribed territory by means of a global control strategy involving screening, cohorting unit, IT tools and antibiotic prescription controls.

Individual and collective impact of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae in patients admitted to the ICU

KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) raises major concerns in the context of intensive care, owing to limited treatment options and the ability to cause outbreaks in this specific setting. The objectives of this review are to give an overview of the burden of KPC-Kp in ICU patients and to discuss methodological issues and limitations regarding the quality of data available. Robust and reliable assessment of the KPC-Kp impact in the ICU should take into consideration not only characteristics of the individuals, but also of the health systems including length of stay, costs and hospital organization issues. Estimates of mortality reported in the current literature are weakened by the poor quality of adjustment for age-specific risks, co-morbidities, and appropriateness of therapy. All these confounding factors should be taken into account in models, with consideration of control groups and competing risks that is currently lacking in the published literature. Since development of antibiotic resistance is an unstoppable phenomenon and economic and human resources are facing progressive limitations due to budget constraints, cost-saving strategies targeted to avoid ICU closure, temporary limitation of admissions or delayed hospital discharge are necessary. The early identification of KPC-Kp-colonized patients through active screening strategies is likely to be the cornerstone of such a cost-saving strategy. However, there are still many open issues concerning which of these strategies are the most effective. Owing to extreme heterogeneity and several methodological flaws in current publications, future studies investigating the long-term sequelae and economic impact of KPC-Kp in the ICU are urgently needed.

Impact of an Intervention to Control Imipenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Its Resistance Mechanisms: An 8-Year Survey

Background

This study aimed to examine the impact of an intervention carried out in 2011 to combat multi-drug resistance and outbreaks of imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (IRAB), and to explore its resistance mechanism.

Methods

A total of 2572 isolates of A. baumannii, including 1673 IRAB isolates, were collected between 2007 and 2014. An intervention was implemented to control A. baumannii resistance and outbreaks. Antimicrobial susceptibility was tested by calculating minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs), and outbreaks were typed using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Resistance mechanisms were explored by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and whole genome sequencing (WGS).

Results

Following the intervention in 2011, the resistance rates of A. baumannii to almost all tested antibiotics decreased, from 85.3 to 72.6% for imipenem, 100 to 80.8% for ceftriaxone, and 45.0 to 6.9% for tigecycline. The intervention resulted in a decrease in the number (seven to five), duration (8–3 months), and departments (five to three) affected by outbreaks; no outbreaks occurred in 2011. After the intervention, only bla_AMPC (76.47 to 100%) and bla_TEM–1 (75.74 to 96.92%) increased (P < 0.0001); whereas bla_GES–1 (32.35 to 3.07%), bla_PER–1 (21.32 to 1.54%), bla_OXA–58 (60.29 to 1.54%), carO (37.50 to 7.69%), and adeB (9.56 to 3.08%) decreased (P < 0.0001). Interestingly, the frequency of class B β-lactamase genes decreased from 91.18% (bla_SPM–1) and 61.03% (bla_IMP–1) to 0%, while that of class D bla_OXA–23 increased to 96.92% (P < 0.0001). WGS showed that the major PFGE types causing outbreaks each year (type 01, 11, 18, 23, 26, and 31) carried the same resistance genes (bla_KPC–1, bla_ADC–25, bla_OXA–66, and adeABC), AdeR-S mutations (G186V and A136V), and a partially blocked porin channel CarO. Meanwhile, plasmids harboring bla_OXA–23 were found after the intervention.

Conclusion

The intervention was highly effective in reducing multi-drug resistance of A. baumannii and IRAB outbreaks in the long term. The resistance mechanisms of IRAB may involve genes encoding β-lactamases, efflux pump overexpression, outer membrane porin blockade, and plasmids; in particular, clonal spread of bla_OXA–23 was the major cause of outbreaks. Similar interventions may also help reduce bacterial resistance rates and outbreaks in other hospitals.

Clinical outcomes of temocillin use for invasive Enterobacterales infections: a single-centre retrospective analysis

Background

With increasing frequency of resistant Gram-negative bacteria, temocillin has potential utility in reducing carbapenem use. The 2020 EUCAST guideline changes temocillin breakpoints and reclassifies isolates with an MIC of 0.001–16 mg/L as ‘susceptible, increased exposure’ necessitating 6 g/day rather than the previous 4 g/day, associated with significant cost implications.

Objectives

We explore the clinical utility and treatment failure rate of temocillin at 4 g/day dosing.

Methods

All adult inpatient electronic prescriptions of temocillin (3 days or greater) from March 2016 to October 2019 were retrieved using a clinical decision support system (ICNET^®). Treatment success was defined as survival, no switch to broad-spectrum agent for the same indication and no subsequent recrudescence of infection, occurring within 30 days.

Results

Temocillin was used in 205 eligible patient-episodes, median age 79 years (IQR : 71–87 years), 42.4% female. Median temocillin course length was 5.9 days (IQR : 4.6–7.8 days). Indications for use: urinary tract infection (UTI) (n = 141), pneumonia (n = 53), other (n = 11). In total, 144 (70.2%) patients had targeted treatment; 74 (36.1%) against Escherichia coli, 70 (34.4%) other Enterobacterales. A total of 130 (63%) patients received 4 g/day; the remaining patients had reduced renal function with dosing in accordance with guidance. Overall temocillin treatment success was 79.5%; highest when used to treat UTI 85.8% (versus 67.9% in respiratory infections, P = 0.008). Empirical treatment demonstrated 82.0% (50/61) success [versus 78.5% (113/144) among targeted treatment, P = 0. 71].

Conclusions

Temocillin at 4 g/day is an effective and safe alternative in treating patients with Gram-negative infections, but should be considered in the context of patient age and comorbidities. Increased dosing or alternate strategies may be indicated when the infection is not of a urinary source.

The daily direct costs of isolating patients identified with highly resistant micro-organisms in a non-outbreak setting

BACKGROUND

Isolation precautions are recommended when caring for patients identified with highly resistant micro-organisms (HRMOs). However, the direct costs of patients in isolation are largely unknown.

AIM

To obtain detailed information on the daily direct costs associated with isolating patients identified with HRMOs.

METHODS

This study was performed from November until December 2017 on a 12-bed surgical ward. This ward contained solely isolation rooms with anterooms. The daily direct costs of isolation were based on three cost items: (1) additional personal protective equipment (PPE), measured by counting the consumption of empty packaging materials; (2) cleaning and disinfection of the isolation room, based on the costs of an outsourced cleaning company; and (3) additional workload for healthcare workers, based on literature and multiplied by the average gross hourly salary of nurses. A distinction was made between the costs for strict isolation, contact-plus isolation, and contact isolation.

FINDINGS

During the study period, 26 patients were nursed in isolation because of HRMO carriage. Time for donning and doffing of PPE was 31 min per day. The average daily direct costs of isolation were the least expensive for contact isolation (gown, gloves), €28/$31, and the most expensive for strict isolation (surgical mask, gloves, gown, cap), €41/$47.

CONCLUSION

Using a novel, easy method to estimate consumption of PPE, we conclude that the daily direct costs of isolating a patient differ per type of isolation. Insight into the direct costs of isolation is of utmost importance when developing or updating infection prevention policies.

Cohorting for preventing the nosocomial spread of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales, in non-epidemic settings: is it mandatory?

BACKGROUND

Worldwide dissemination of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales (CPE) has led to national and international guidance recommending the implementation of cohorting in healthcare settings (HS). However, in view of recent data regarding the spread of Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, we may wonder about the usefulness of this measure in a non-outbreak settings; here, individual contact isolation may be sufficient to control the risk of dissemination.

AIM/METHODS

We conducted a narrative review of the literature and discussed the role of cohorting.

FINDINGS

CPE are responsible for outbreaks in HS, which are considered the epicentre of spread of resistance strains. CPE are responsible for adverse effects such as increases in hospital stay and costs, less therapeutic options and thus higher risk of clinical failures and mortality. Environment and materials have also been described contaminated with CPE and can be the source of outbreak. Even if guidelines and publications have supported implementation of cohorting, there are no randomized studies demonstrating the mandatory nature of this measure. Most studies are descriptive and cohorting is usually one of several other measures to control outbreaks. Cohorting is not adapted to all HS, which requires human and material resources. Other measures must be strengthened such as compliance of hand hygiene, antibiotic stewardship and surveillance of contact patients. Individual risk factors of acquisition should also be evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Local epidemiology and resources must be assessed before implementing cohorting.

Healthcare-Associated Infections Due to Multidrug-Resistant Organisms: a Surveillance Study on Extra Hospital Stay and Direct Costs

BACKGROUND

The increasing antimicrobial resistance poses a challenge to surveillance systems and raises concerns about the impact of multidrug-resistant organisms on patient safety.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to estimate extra hospital stay and economic burden of infections due to alert organisms - mostly multidrug-resistant - in a teaching hospital.

METHODS

The present retrospective matched cohort study was conducted based on the analysis of hospital admissions at Sant'Andrea Teaching Hospital in Rome from April to December 2015. Extra hospital stay was the difference in the length of stay between each case and control. All the patients developing an infection due to an alert organism were considered cases, all others were eligible as controls. The costs of LOS were evaluated by multiplying the extra stay with the hospital daily cost.

RESULTS

Overall, 122 patients developed an infection due to alert organisms and were all matched with controls. The attributable extra stay was of 2,291 days (mean 18.8; median 19.0) with a significantly increased hospitalization in intensive care units (21.2 days), bloodstream infections (52.5 days), and infections due to Gram-negative bacteria (mean 29.2 days; median 32.6 days). Applying the single day hospital cost, the overall additional expenditure was 11,549 euro per patient. The average additional cost of antibiotic drugs for the treatment of infections was about 1,200 euro per patient.

CONCLUSION

The present study presents an accurate mapping of the clinical and economic impact of infections attributable to alert organisms demonstrating that infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms are associated with higher mortality, longer hospital stays, and increased costs. Article Highlights Box: The increasing antimicrobial resistance poses a challenge for surveillance systems and raises concerns about the impact of multidrug-resistant organisms on patient safety. • Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) have historically been recognized as a significant public health problem requiring close surveillance. • Despite several and reliable findings have been achieved on clinical issues, our knowledge on the economic impact of healthcare-associated infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms needs to be widened. • Estimating the cost of infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms in terms of extra hospital stay and economic burden is complex, and the financial impact varies across different health systems. • Evaluations of social and economic implications of hospital infections play an increasingly important role in the implementation of surveillance systems. • The costs of infection prevention and control programs and dedicated personnel are relatively low and self-sustainable when efficient.

Screening for carriage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in settings of high endemicity: a position paper from an Italian working group on CRE infections

Introduction

A variety of national and international guidelines exist around the management of carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CREs), but some of these are several years old and do not reflect current epidemiology and they also do not necessarily give pragmatic advice around active surveillance of CREs in countries with a high burden of cases and limited resources. This paper aims to provide a best practice position paper to guide active surveillance in a variety of scenarios in these settings, and discusses which patients should be screened, what methods could be used for screening, and how results might influence infection prevention interventions.

Methods

This paper was developed as a result of a series of meetings of expert opinion leaders representing the major infectious disease and infection prevention societies in Italy and having the endorsement of AMCLI (Italian Association of Clinical Microbiology) and SITA (Italian Society for Anti-infective Therapy). There was no attempt to undertake a full systematic review of the evidence, as it was felt that this was inadequate to inform a pragmatic view on the best way forward based on current epidemiology and infection rates.

Key recommendations

Key recommendations focus on the urgent need to promote measures to prevent transmission and infection, focusing on high risk patients and clinical areas, as well as outbreak situations. Active surveillance leading to appropriate infection prevention precautions plays a major role in this.

Conclusions

There are limited national or international guidelines giving pragmatic advice on the most appropriate measures for active surveillance and management of colonized patients in a high-burden setting such as Italy. While individual hospitals and regions will need to formulate their own policies based on local epidemiology, this position paper attempts to highlight current best practice in this area and provide pragmatic advice for clinicians, infection prevention staff, and healthcare managers.

Antibiotic misuse: How to evaluate the costs?

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have assessed the costs associated with the misuse of antibiotics in hospitals in France, despite the value of health economic data to inform antibiotic stewardship activities. We aimed to identify the methodological tools used to assess the cost of antibiotic misuse in hospitals.

METHODS

We performed a literature review using the major electronic medical databases. An index of relevance was developed to assess the intrinsic quality of selected articles.

RESULTS

Four hundred and three articles were retrieved, but 35 were selected for analysis. Most studies investigated the inadequate choice of the antibiotic molecule (n=17), the incorrect treatment duration (n=9), and the administration of an inappropriate dosage (n=7). Only three studies were medical/economic evaluations of specific interventions, such as prescription control by pharmacists or the implementation of a new diagnostic test. Considering our aim, the relevance of the studies was limited: few had defined the economic assessment as the primary objective or had detailed the method for calculating costs. Nevertheless, the misuse evaluation was usually better described.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite these limits, key factors for measuring antibiotic misuse (i.e., molecule choice, dosage) in relation to the costs (i.e., over/under prescription, hospital stay, staff remuneration) might serve as the basis for the development of a reference methodology to value the costs of misuse. The application of this methodology on identified situations of antibiotic misuse would help hospital decision-makers to justify resource allocation for implementing antimicrobial stewardship activities.

The incremental cost of infections associated with multidrug-resistant organisms in the inpatient hospital setting-A national estimate

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost of infections associated with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) during inpatient hospitalization in the United States.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING

2014 National Inpatient Sample.

STUDY DESIGN

Multivariable regression models assessed the incremental effect of MDROs on the cost of hospitalization and hospital length of stay among patients with bacterial infections.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS

We retrospectively identified 6 385 258 inpatient stays for patients with bacterial infection.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The national incidence rate of inpatient stays with bacterial infection is 20.1 percent. At least 10.8 percent of such stays-and as many as 16.9 percent if we account for undercoded infections-show evidence of one or more MDROs. MRSA, C. difficile, infection with another MDRO, and the presence of more than one MDRO are associated with $1718 (95% CI, $1609-$1826), $4617 (95% CI, $4407-$4827), $2302 (95% CI, $2044-$2560), and $3570 (95% CI, $3019-$4122) in additional costs per stay, respectively. The national cost of infections associated with MDROs is at least $2.39 billion (95% CI, $2.25-$2.52 billion) and as high as $3.38 billion (95% CI, $3.13-$3.62 billion) if we account for undercoded infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Infections associated with MDROs result in a substantial cost burden to the US health care system.

Extensively-drug-resistant bacteria carriers among overseas travellers: one-third had not been hospitalized previously

BACKGROUND

Extensively-drug-resistant bacteria (XDRB) have emerged as a major source of resistance. Hospitalization abroad seems to be the major risk factor associated with carriage, and numerous reports have warned about the risk of in-hospital transmission. However, little is known regarding possible community transmission.

METHODS

A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted in a Parisian teaching hospital, which included patients admitted to hospital with a history of travel abroad over the preceding 12 months. Each XDRB carrier at admission (case) was matched with two non-carriers (controls) hospitalized in the same ward and admitted during the same month.

AIM

To describe and identify risk factors associated with XDRB carriage at admission.

FINDINGS

Forty-six cases and 92 controls were enrolled. The results of univariate and multi-variate analyses showed that health repatriation was the only factor associated with a higher risk of carrying XDRB (odds ratio 3.22, 95% confidence interval 1.23-7.84; P=0.01). Surprisingly, one-third of the study population had not been hospitalized abroad within the preceding 12 months. The most frequently identified XDRB species were Escherichia coli (36%), Enterococcus spp. (17%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (9%), and the most frequently identified enzyme was OXA-48 (36%).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, health repatriation was the only risk factor for XDRB carriage identified at admission. Furthermore, the data suggest community-onset transmission. Therefore, there is an urgent need to conduct studies in high-risk countries to identify the risk factors associated with community carriage.

Is cohorting the only solution to control carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae outbreaks? A single-centre experience

BACKGROUND

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are a major health issue. Cohorting may help to control spread of CPEs in hospitals, but is expensive and hard to implement.

AIM

To identify ward variables associated with CPE in-hospital transmission in a hospital where cohorting has never been implemented.

METHODS

Cohort prospective study, comparing 14-consecutive-day periods regarding in-hospital transmission. Each period met the two following conditions: (i) CPE carriers/infected admitted for ≥48 h; (ii) 80% of relative contact patients were screened at least twice. Periods (a) with no acquired CPE case among relative contact patients were compared to periods (b) during which one or more CPE case acquisition was identified. Variables potentially associated with CPE transmission were assessed: colonization pressure, caregiver:patient ratio, hand hygiene compliance, hydro-alcoholic product consumption, antibiotic consumption, and infection control team (ICT) involvement on the ward.

FINDINGS

Sixty-eight periods of two consecutive weeks were included, 18 (26.5%) included at least one CPE case acquisition. By multivariate analysis, colonization pressure (odds ratio: 1.12; 95% confidence interval: 1.0-1.25; P = 0.042) and antibiotic consumption (2.41; 1.02-5.66; P = 0.044) were associated with CPE in-hospital transmission. Caregiver:patient ratio potentiated both these variables, suggesting a role for understaffing in CPE transmission.

CONCLUSION

Understanding ward variables associated with CPE spread can help design suitable solutions. Colonization pressure and antibiotic consumption seems to be driving in-hospital transmission, along with caregiver:patient ratio. In presence of high colonization pressure, dedicated healthcare workers for managing CPE patients should be implemented. Co-ordination between ICT and antimicrobial stewardship team is also crucial to prevent CPE spread.

Direct Costs of a Contact Isolation Day: A Prospective Cost Analysis at a Swiss University Hospital

We prospectively evaluated direct costs of contact precautions using on-site observation. Additional mean costs per patient day were calculated for extra materials used, increased workload, and one-off isolation activities. The cost of contact precautions was $158.90 (95% confidence interval, $124.90‒$192.80) per patient day. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2018;39:101-103.

Infection control interventions affected by resource shortages: impact on the incidence of bacteremias caused by carbapenem-resistant pathogens

We evaluated an infection control (IC) program influenced by personnel and material resource shortages on the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSI) due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) in an endemic region. Between January 2010 and December 2015, all BSI episodes caused by CRKP, CRAB, and CRPA were recorded. An IC bundle was implemented in January 2012. We evaluated the effect of the interventions on BSI rates between the pre-intervention (2010-2011) and intervention (2012-2013) periods, using an interrupted time-series model. From 2014, when interventions were still applied, BSI incidence was gradually increased. For this reason, we evaluated with a linear mixed effects model several factors possibly contributing to this increase for the years 2012-2015, which was considered as the intervention/follow-up period. During the study period, 351 patients with BSI were recorded, with a total of 538 episodes; the majority (83.6%) occurred in the intensive care unit (ICU). The BSI incidence rate per year during 2010-2015 for ICU patients was 21.03/19.63/17.32/14.45/22.85/25.02 per 1000 patient-days, respectively, with the reduction in BSI levels after the start of intervention marginal (p = 0.054). During the follow-up period (2014-2015), the most influential factors for the increased BSI incidence were the reduced participation in educational courses and compliance with hand hygiene. The implementation of IC interventions reduced the BSI incidence rates, particularly for ICU patients. However, factors possibly related to the restrictions of human and material resources apparently contributed to the observed expansion of BSI in our endemic setting.

Control of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae outbreaks in acute settings: an evidence review

BACKGROUND

In recent years, infections with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) have been increasing globally and present a major public health challenge.

AIM

To review the international literature: (i) to describe CPE outbreaks in acute hospital settings globally; and (ii) to identify the control measures used during these outbreaks and report on their effectiveness.

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases, abstract lists for key conferences and reference lists of key reviews was undertaken, and information on unpublished outbreaks was sought for 2000-2015. Where relevant, risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. A narrative synthesis of the evidence was conducted.

FINDINGS

Ninety-eight outbreaks were eligible. These occurred worldwide, with 53 reports from Europe. The number of cases (CPE infection or colonization) involved in outbreaks varied widely, from two to 803. In the vast majority of outbreaks, multi-component infection control measures were used, commonly including: patient screening; contact precautions (e.g. gowns, gloves); handwashing interventions; staff education or monitoring; enhanced environmental cleaning/decontamination; cohorting of patients and/or staff; and patient isolation. Seven studies were identified as providing the best-available evidence on the effectiveness of control measures. These demonstrated that CPE outbreaks can be controlled successfully using a range of appropriate, commonly used, infection control measures. However, risk of bias was considered relatively high for these studies.

CONCLUSION

The findings indicate that CPE outbreaks can be controlled using combinations of existing measures. However, the quality of the evidence base is weak and further high-quality research is needed, particularly on the effectiveness of individual infection control measures.