Complete genome sequencing of Enterococcus faecalis strains suggests role of Ebp deletion in infective endocarditis relapse

C-terminal deletion of RelA protein is suggested as a possible cause of infective endocarditis recurrence with Enterococcus faecium

Infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Enterococcus spp. represents the third most common cause of IE, with high rates of relapse compared with other bacteria. Interestingly, late relapses (>6 months) have only been described in Enterococcus faecalis, but here we describe the first reported IE relapse with Enterococcus faecium more than a year (17 months) after the initial endocarditis episode. Firstly, by multi locus sequence typing (MLST), we demonstrated that both isolates (EF646 and EF641) belong to the same sequence type (ST117). Considering that EF641 was able to overcome starvation and antibiotic treatment conditions surviving for a long period of time, we performed bioinformatic analysis in identifying potential genes involved in virulence and stringent response. Our results showed a 13-nucleotide duplication (positions 1638-1650) in the gene relA, resulting in a premature stop codon, with a loss of 167 amino acids from the C-terminal domains of the RelA enzyme. RelA mediates the stringent response in bacteria, modulating levels of the alarmone guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp). The relA mutant (EF641) was associated with lower growth capacity, the presence of small colony variants, and higher capacity to produce biofilms (compared with the strain EF646), but without differences in antimicrobial susceptibility patterns according to standard procedures during planktonic growth. Instead, EF641 demonstrated tolerance to high doses of teicoplanin when growing in a biofilm. We conclude that all these events would be closely related to the long-term survival of the E. faecium and the late relapse of the IE. These data represent the first clinical evidence of mutations in the stringent response (relA gene) related with E. faecium IE relapse.

Enterococcus faecalis endocarditis: what's next?

Enterococcus faecalis infective endocarditis (EFIE) is a complex entity in rapid evolution. Although largely relevant findings from recent studies have advanced the knowledge on EFIE and led to some changes in clinical guidelines, there are still a number of gaps to be filled. Coordinated, international, multicenter efforts are needed to obtain quality data that rend the health systems and scientific community prepared enough to understand and handle this infection. In this Perspective, some of the most relevant aspects concerning the epidemiology, clinical presentation and outcomes, diagnostic approaches and antibiotic therapy of EFIE are addressed. Also, several potential future clinical developments in the field are discussed.

Microdiversity of Enterococcus faecalis isolates in cases of infective endocarditis: selection of non-synonymous mutations and large deletions is associated with phenotypic modifications

Context: Today, infective endocarditis (IE) caused by Enterococcus faecalis represents 10% of all IE and is marked by its difficult management and the frequency of relapses. Although the precise reasons for that remain to be elucidated, the evolution of the culprit strain under selective pressure through microdiversification could be, at least in part, involved. Material and methods: To further study the in situ genetic microdiversity and its possible phenotypic manifestations in E. faecalis IE, we sequenced and compared multiple isolates from the valves, blood culture and joint fluid of five patients who underwent valvular surgery. Growth rate and early biofilm production of selected isolates were also compared. Results: By sequencing a total of 58 E. faecalis genomes, we detected a considerable genomic microdiversity, not only among strains from different anatomical origins, but also between isolates from the same studied cardiac valves. Interestingly, deletions of thousands of bases including the well-known virulence factors ebpA/B/C, and srtC, as well as other large prophage sequences containing genes coding for proteins implicated in platelet binding (PlbA and PlbB) were evidenced. The study of mutations helped unveil common patterns in genes related to the cell cycle as well as central metabolism, suggesting an evolutionary convergence in these isolates. As expected, such modifications were associated with a significant impact on the in-vitro phenotypic heterogeneity, growth, and early biofilm production. Conclusion: Genome modifications associated with phenotypic variations may allow bacterial adaptation to both antibiotic and immune selective pressures, and thus promote relapses.

A Contemporary Picture of Enterococcal Endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Enterococcal endocarditis (EE) is a growing entity in Western countries. However, quality data from large studies is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics and analyze the prognostic factors of EE in the GAMES cohort.

METHODS

This was a post hoc analysis of a prospectively collected cohort of patients from 35 Spanish centers from 2008 to 2016. Characteristics and outcomes of 516 cases of EE were compared with those of 3,308 cases of nonenterococcal endocarditis (NEE). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were performed to investigate risk factors for in-hospital and 1-year mortality, as well as relapses.

RESULTS

Patients with EE were significantly older; more frequently presented chronic lung disease, chronic heart failure, prior endocarditis, and degenerative valve disease; and had higher median age-adjusted Charlson score. EE more frequently involved the aortic valve and prosthesis (64.3% vs. 46.7%; p < 0.001; and 35.9% vs. 28.9%; p = 0.002, respectively) but less frequently pacemakers/defibrillators (1.5% vs. 10.5%; p < 0.001), and showed higher rates of acute heart failure (45% vs. 38.3%; p = 0.005). Cardiac surgery was less frequently performed in EE (40.7% vs. 45.9%; p = 0.024). No differences in in-hospital and 1-year mortality were found, whereas relapses were significantly higher in EE (3.5% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.035). Increasing Charlson score, LogEuroSCORE, acute heart failure, septic shock, and paravalvular complications were risk factors for mortality, whereas prior endocarditis was protective and persistent bacteremia constituted the sole risk factor for relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Besides other baseline and clinical differences, EE more frequently affects prosthetic valves and less frequently pacemakers/defibrillators. EE presents higher rates of relapse than NEE.