Reporting methods of observational cohort studies in CMI

In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded.

Results

22 in vitro, 7 in vivo and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. In vitro studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer in vitro or in vivo studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies.

Discussion

The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.

The association of cytomegalovirus infection and cytomegalovirus serostatus with invasive fungal infections in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HSCT) recipients, the inter-relationship between post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) and subsequent invasive fungal infections (IFIs) is conflicting and the association of CMV serostatus with IFIs has not been evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between CMV infection/serostatus and IFIs in allo-HSCT populations.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic literature search was conducted from existence until 11 July 2021 using Medline, Embase and ISI Web of Science databases.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Cross-sectional, prospective cohort, retrospective cohort and case-control studies that reported allo-HSCT recipients with CMV and without CMV who developed or did not develop IFIs after CMV infection.

PARTICIPANTS

Allo-HSCT recipients.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

METHODS

A systematic search, screening, data extracting and assessing study quality were independently conducted by two reviewers. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess risk of bias. data were analysed using the pooled effect estimates of a random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 18 and 12 studies were included for systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Post-transplant CMV infection significantly increased the risk of IFIs with a pooled hazard ratio (pHR) of 2.58 (1.78, 3.74), I² = 75%. Further subgroup analyses by timing of IFIs, CMV definitions, study continents, study design and adjustment of effect estimates showed that post-transplant CMV infection consistently increased the risk of subsequent IFIs. High-risk CMV serostatus (D-/R+) increased the risk of IFIs with a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.33 (1.04, 1.71), I² = 0%, but low-risk CMV serostatus (D-/R-) decreased the risk of IFIs with a pOR of 0.69 (0.55, 0.87), I² = 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant CMV infection and high-risk CMV serostatus increased the risk of IFIs, but low-risk CMV serostatus decreased risk of IFIs among allo-HSCT recipients. Further studies are needed to identify at-risk allo-HSCT recipients as well as to focus on fungal diagnostics and prophylaxis to prevent this fungal-after-viral phenomenon.

Short versus prolonged antibiotic treatment for complicated urinary tract infection after kidney transplantation

There is no consensus regarding the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy for urinary tract infection (UTI) following kidney transplantation (KT). We performed a retrospective study comparing short (6-10 days) versus prolonged (11-21 days) antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI among KT recipients. Univariate and inverse probability treatment weighted (IPTW) adjusted multivariate analysis for composite primary outcome of all-cause mortality or readmissions within 30 days and relapsed UTI 180 days were performed. Overall, 214 KT recipients with complicated UTI were included; 115 short-course treatment (median 8, interquartile range [IQR] 6-9 days), 99 prolonged course (median 14, IQR 12-21 days). The composite outcome occurred in 33 (28.6%) in the short-course group and 30 (30%) in the prolonged-course group; relapsed UTI occurred in 19 (16.5%) vs. 21 (21%), respectively. Duration of antibiotic treatment was not associated with any of these outcomes. The only risk factor for mortality/readmissions in multivariate analysis was deceased donor. No differences between groups were demonstrated for length of hospital stay, rates of bacteraemia, resistance development, and serum creatinine at 30 and 90 days. In conclusion, we found no difference in clinical outcomes between KT recipients treated for complicated UTI with short-course antibiotic (6-10 days) versus longer course (11-21 days).