Impact of rapid microbial identification on clinical outcomes in bloodstream infection: the RAPIDO randomized trial

Prediction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae from flagged blood cultures by combining rapid Sepsityper MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with machine learning

This study investigated combination of the Rapid Sepsityper Kit and a machine learning (ML)-based matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) approach for rapid prediction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) from positive blood culture bottles. The study involved 461 patients with monomicrobial bloodstream infections. Species identification was performed using the conventional MALDI-TOF MS Biotyper system and the Rapid Sepsityper protocol. The data underwent preprocessing steps, and ML models were trained using preprocessed MALDI-TOF data and corresponding labels. The interpretability of the model was enhanced using SHapely Additive exPlanations values to identify significant features. In total, 44 S. aureus isolates comprising 406 MALDI-TOF MS files and 126 K. pneumoniae isolates comprising 1249 MALDI-TOF MS files were evaluated. This study demonstrated the feasibility of predicting MRSA among S. aureus and CRKP among K. pneumoniae isolates using MALDI-TOF MS and Sepsityper. Accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and F1 score for MRSA/methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were 0.875, 0.898 and 0.904, respectively; for CRKP/carbapenem-susceptible K. pneumoniae, these values were 0.766, 0.828 and 0.795, respectively. In conclusion, the novel ML-based MALDI-TOF MS approach enables rapid identification of MRSA and CRKP from flagged blood cultures within 1 h. This enables earlier initiation of targeted antimicrobial therapy, reducing deaths due to sepsis. The favourable performance and reduced turnaround time of this method suggest its potential as a rapid detection strategy in clinical microbiology laboratories, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

Bloodstream Infections: Comparison of Diagnostic Methods and Therapeutic Consequences between a Hospital in a Resource-Limited Setting and Two French Hospitals

In recent years, the diagnosis of bloodstream infections has been complemented by rapid microbiological methods, unattainable to most clinical laboratories in resource-limited settings. We evaluated the impact of their shortage on antibiotic therapy adequacy. We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study including 150 adult Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia episodes, evenly distributed across three university hospitals: one in Lebanon, a resource-limited setting, and two in France, a resource-rich setting. Previous colonization by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) was significantly more prevalent among the Lebanese than the French group of patients (16/50 vs. 5/100; p < 0.01). Bloodstream infections by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales and other MDRO were higher among the Lebanese than the French group of patients (25/50 vs. 12/100; p < 0.01). For the French group, rapid identification of species and mechanisms of resistance significantly shortened turnaround time for definitive laboratory diagnosis and increased antibiotic therapy adequacy. No statistically significant differences were noted in targeted antibiotic therapy between the two groups. This study suggests that, in settings where bacterial resistance is prevalent, rapid microbiological methods have not provided any additional value. The clinical and economic impact of rapid microbiological methods will likely depend on local CPE, VRE, and other MDRO epidemiology and are areas for future research.

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry rapid pathogen identification and outcomes of patients with bloodstream infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

There was inconsistent evidence regarding the use of matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‐TOF MS) for microorganism identification with/without antibiotic stewardship team (AST) and the clinical outcome of patients with bloodstream infections (BSI). In a systematic review and meta‐analysis, we evaluated the effectiveness of rapid microbial identification by MALDI‐TOF MS with and without AST on clinical outcomes. We searched PubMed and EMBASE databases from inception to 1 February 2022 to identify pre–post and parallel comparative studies that evaluated the use of MALDI‐TOF MS for microorganism identification. Pooled effect estimates were derived using the random‐effects model. Twenty‐one studies with 14,515 patients were meta‐analysed. Compared with conventional phenotypic methods, MALDI‐TOF MS was associated with a 23% reduction in mortality (RR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66; 0.90; I² = 35.9%; 13 studies); 5.07‐h reduction in time to effective antibiotic therapy (95% CI: −5.83; −4.31; I² = 95.7%); 22.86‐h reduction in time to identify microorganisms (95% CI: −23.99; −21.74; I² = 91.6%); 0.73‐day reduction in hospital stay (95% CI: −1.30; −0.16; I² = 53.1%); and US$4140 saving in direct hospitalization cost (95% CI: $‐8166.75; $‐113.60; I² = 66.1%). No significant heterogeneity sources were found, and no statistical evidence for publication bias was found. Rapid pathogen identification by MALDI‐TOF MS with or without AST was associated with reduced mortality and improved outcomes of BSI, and may be cost‐effective among patients with BSI.

Diagnosis and management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: guideline endorsed by the Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI) and the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM)

Management of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal management of these infections, with a focus on targeted antibiotic therapy. The document was produced by a panel of experts nominated by the five endorsing Italian societies, namely the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA). Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) questions about microbiological diagnosis, pharmacological strategies and targeted antibiotic therapy were addressed for the following pathogens: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2011 to November 2020 was guided by the PICO strategy. As data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were expected to be limited, observational studies were also reviewed. The certainty of evidence was classified using the GRADE approach. Recommendations were classified as strong or conditional. Detailed recommendations were formulated for each pathogen. The majority of available RCTs have serious risk of bias, and many observational studies have several limitations, including small sample size, retrospective design and presence of confounders. Thus, some recommendations are based on low or very-low certainty of evidence. Importantly, these recommendations should be continually updated to reflect emerging evidence from clinical studies and real-world experience.

Patients with transplantation have reduced mortality in bacteraemia: analysis of data from a randomised trial

Objectives

Infection remains a major complication of organ transplantation. Paradoxically, epidemiological studies suggest better survival from serious infection. We analysed the relationship between organ transplantation and short -term mortality of patients with bloodstream infection.

Methods

Data on transplantation status was extracted from a large prospective, multi-centre clinical trial in bloodstream infection. Logistic regression for 28-day mortality was performed on the whole cohort and a propensity-matched cohort (3:1). Infective pathogen, focus of infection, and clinical variables were included in the model. Mediation analysis was performed on clinical variables to explore causation.

Results

4,178 participants were included in the full cohort, with 868 in the matched cohort, of which 217 received an organ transplant. Haematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT) were the most common transplant (n = 99), followed by kidney (n = 70). The most common pathogens were staphylococci and Enterobacterales. Transplantation status was associated with a reduced mortality in both the whole (Odds Ratio, OR 0.53; 95% CI 0.28, 0.77) and matched (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34, 0.90) cohort, while steroid use was robustly associated with increased mortality OR 4.4 (95% CI 3.12, 6.20) in the whole cohort and OR 5.24 (95% CI 2.79, 9.84) in the matched cohort. There was no interaction between steroid use and transplant status, so transplant patients on steroids generally had increased mortality relative to those without either.

Conclusions

Organ transplantation is associated with a near halving of short term mortality in bloodstream infection, including a cohort matched for comorbidities, infective pathogen and focus. Steroid usage is associated with increased mortality regardless of transplant status. Understanding the mechanism and causation of this mortality benefit should be a focus of future research.

Current opinion in management of septic shock due to Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused multiple challenges to ICUs, including an increased rate of secondary infections, mostly caused by Gram-negative micro-organisms. Worrying trends of resistance acquisition complicate this picture. We provide a review of the latest evidence to guide management of patients with septic shock because of Gram-negative bacteria.

RECENT FINDINGS

New laboratory techniques to detect pathogens and specific resistance patterns from the initial culture are available. Those may assist decreasing the time to adequate antimicrobial therapy and avoid unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic overuse. New antimicrobials, including β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, such as ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam or meropenem-vaborbactam and cephalosporins, such as cefiderocol targeted to specific pathogens and resistance patterns are available for use in the clinical setting. Optimization of antibiotic dosing and delivery should follow pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles and wherever available therapeutic drug monitoring. Management of sepsis has brought capillary refill time back to the spotlight along with more reasoned fluid resuscitation and a moderate approach to timing of dialysis initiation.

SUMMARY

Novel rapid diagnostic tests and antimicrobials specifically targeted to Gram-negative pathogens are available and should be used within the principles of antimicrobial stewardship including de-escalation and short duration of antimicrobial therapy.

Cost-effectiveness of rapid laboratory-based mass-spectrometry diagnosis of bloodstream infection: evidence from the RAPIDO randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES AND INTERVENTION

Bloodstream infection, the presence of viable micro-organisms in the blood, is a prevalent clinical event associated with substantial mortality. Patient outcomes may be improved when the causative micro-organism is identified quickly. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of rapid microbial identification by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry.

DESIGN

Economic evaluation alongside a randomised multicentre trial (RAPIDO: RAPId Diagnosis on Outcome) assessing the impact of rapid identification by MALDI-TOF spectrometry.

SETTING

Adult inpatients with bloodstream infections at seven National Health Service hospital trusts in England and Wales.

PRIMARY OUTCOME

Net monetary benefit, estimated as incremental costs compared with incremental 28-day survival, of rapid identification by MALDI-TOF spectrometry compared with conventional identification.

METHODS

Patients were randomised (1:1) to receive diagnosis by conventional methods of microbial identification (conventional arm) only or by MALDI-TOF spectrometry in addition to conventional identification (RAPIDO arm).

RESULTS

Data from 5550 patients were included in primary analysis. Mean imputed costs in 2018/2019 prices per patient were lower by £126 in the RAPIDO arm (95% CI -£784 to £532) but the proportion of patients alive at day 28 was lower (81.4% vs 82.3%). The probability of cost-effectiveness of MALDI-TOF was <0.5 at cost-effectiveness thresholds between £20 000 and £50 000.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive MALDI-TOF diagnosis was unlikely to be cost-effective when measured as cost per death avoided at 28 days. However, the differences between arms in cost and effect were modest, associated with uncertainty and may not accurately reflect 'real-world' routine use of MALDI-TOF technology in this patient group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

ISRCTN97107018/UKCRN 11978.

Analytical challenges in estimating the effect of exposures that are bounded by follow-up time: experiences from the Blood Stream Infection-Focus on Outcomes study

Objective

To illustrate the challenges of estimating the effect of an exposure that is bounded by duration of follow-up on all-cause 28-day mortality, whilst simultaneously addressing missing data and time-varying covariates.

Study design and methods

BSI-FOO is a multicentre cohort study with the primary aim of quantifying the effect of modifiable risk factors, including time to initiation of therapy, on all-cause 28-day mortality in patients with bloodstream infection. The primary analysis involved two Cox proportional hazard models, first one for non-modifiable risk factors and second one for modifiable risk factors, with a risk score calculated from the first model included as a covariate in the second model. Modifiable risk factors considered in this study were recorded daily for a maximum of 28 days after infection. Follow-up was split at daily intervals from day 0 to 28 with values of daily collected data updated at each interval (i.e., one row per patient per day).

Analytical challenges

Estimating the effect of time to initiation of treatment on survival is analytically challenging since only those who survive to time t can wait until time t to start treatment, introducing immortal time bias. Time-varying covariates representing cumulative counts were used for variables bounded by survival time e.g. the cumulative count of days before first receipt of treatment. Multiple imputation using chained equations was used to impute missing data, using conditional imputation to avoid imputing non-applicable data e.g. ward data after discharge.

Conclusion

Using time-varying covariates represented by cumulative counts within a one row per day per patient framework can reduce the risk of bias in effect estimates. The approach followed uses established methodology and is easily implemented in standard statistical packages.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12874-021-01393-9.

Implementation of rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing combined with routine infectious disease bedside consultation in clinical practice (RAST-ID): a prospective single-centre study

OBJECTIVES

Recently, EUCAST released guidelines for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) directly from positive blood culture bottles. The aim of our prospective single-centre clinical study was to assess the proportion of readable results and errors compared with routine antimicrobial susceptibility testing and the clinical consequences drawn by infectious disease (ID) physicians from RAST results during same-day bedside consultation.

METHODS

All positive blood cultures suitable for RAST from January to December 2019 were included and RAST results at 4 and 6 h compared with standard disc diffusion. The real-life impact of RAST on clinical decisions was assessed during same-day ID bedside consultation.

RESULTS

The proportion of readable RAST results was significantly higher after 6 h of incubation compared with after 4 h (881/930 versus 642/847; P < 0.0001). Major and very major errors were rare (17/642 after 4 h and 12/881 after 6 h; P = 0.087). ID consultation was performed in 134 patients after the RAST result. Antimicrobial treatment was changed in 73 patients and 84 additional measures (i.e. imaging studies, surgery, additional resistance testing) were ordered in 62 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

RAST according to EUCAST methods was easy to implement with a low number of major and very major errors after 6 h of incubation. ID physicians performing bedside consultations frequently used this information to change antimicrobial treatment and recommended additional measures.

Time to positivity in bloodstream infection is not a prognostic marker for mortality: analysis of a prospective multicentre randomized control trial

OBJECTIVES

Time to positivity (TTP), calculated automatically in modern blood culture systems, is considered a proxy for microbial load and has been suggested as a potential prognostic marker in bloodstream infections. In this large, multicentre, prospectively collected cohort, our primary analysis aimed to quantify the relationship between the TTP of monomicrobial blood cultures and mortality.

METHODS

Data from a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RAPIDO) in bloodstream infection were analysed. Bloodstream infections were classified into 13 groups/subgroups. The relationship between mortality and TTP was assessed by logistic regression, adjusted for site, organism, and clinical variables, and linear regression was applied to examine the association between clinical variables and TTP. Robustness was assessed by sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

In total 4468 participants were included in the RAPIDO. After exclusions, 3462 were analysed, with the most common organisms being coagulase-negative staphylococci (1072 patients) and Escherichia coli (861 patients); 785 patients (22.7%) died within 28 days. We found no relationship between TTP and mortality for any groups except for streptococci (odds ratio (OR) with each hour 0.98, 95%CI 0.96-1.00) and Candida (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.05). There was large variability between organisms and sites in TTP. Fever (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.95, 95%CI 0.92-0.99), age (GMR per 10 years 1.01, 95%CI 1.00-1.02), and neutrophilia were associated with TTP (GMR 1.03, 95%CI 1.02-1.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Time to positivity is not associated with mortality, except in the case of Candida spp. (longer times associated with worse outcomes) and possibly streptococci (shorter times associated with worse outcomes). There was a large variation between median times across centres, limiting external validity.

Rapid versus standard antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide treatment of bloodstream infection

BACKGROUND

Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility tests are expected to reduce the time to clinically important results of a blood culture. This might enable clinicians to better target therapy to a person's needs, and thereby, improve health outcomes (mortality, length of hospital stay), and reduce unnecessary prescribing of broad-spectrum antibiotics; thereby reducing antimicrobial resistance rates.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of rapid susceptibility testing versus standard susceptibility testing for bloodstream infections (BSIs).

SEARCH METHODS

To identify studies with selected outcomes, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, LILACS, and two trials registries, between 1987 and October 2020. We used 'bloodstream infection' and 'antimicrobial susceptibility tests' as search terms. We had no language or publication status limitations.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (with a time-to-result of ≤ 8 hours) versus conventional antimicrobial susceptibility testing in people with a BSI caused by any bacteria, as identified by a positive blood culture.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened references, full-text reports of potentially relevant studies, extracted data from the studies, and assessed risk of bias. Any disagreement was discussed and resolved with a third review author. For mortality, a dichotomous outcome, we extracted the number of events in each arm, and presented a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) to compare rapid susceptibility testing to conventional methods. We used Review Manager 5.4 to meta-analyse the data. For other outcomes, which are time-to-event outcomes (time-to-discharge from hospital, time-to-first appropriate antibiotic change), we conducted qualitative narrative synthesis, due to heterogeneity of outcome measures.  MAIN RESULTS: We included six trials, with 1638 participants. For rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing compared to conventional methods, there was little or no difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.46; 6 RCTs, 1638 participants; low-certainty evidence). In subgroup analysis, for rapid genotypic or molecular antimicrobial susceptibility testing compared to conventional methods, there was little or no difference in mortality between groups (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.49; 4 RCTs, 1074 participants; low-certainty evidence). For phenotypic rapid susceptibility testing compared to conventional methods, there was little or no difference in mortality between groups  (RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.80 to 2.35; 2 RCTs, 564 participants; low-certainty evidence). In qualitative analysis, rapid susceptibility testing may make little or no difference in time-to-discharge (4 RCTs, 1165 participants; low-certainty evidence). In qualitative analysis, rapid genotypic susceptibility testing compared to conventional testing may make little or no difference in time-to-appropriate antibiotic (3 RCTs, 929 participants; low-certainty evidence). In subgroup analysis, rapid phenotypic susceptibility testing compared to conventional testing may improve time-to-appropriate antibiotic (RR -17.29, CI -45.05 to 10.47; 2 RCTs, 564 participants; low-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The theoretical benefits of rapid susceptibility testing have not been demonstrated to directly improve mortality, time-to-discharge, or time-to-appropriate antibiotic in these randomized studies. Future large prospective studies should be designed to focus on the most clinically meaningful outcomes, and aim to optimize blood culture pathways.

The value of MALDI-TOF failure to provide an identification of Staphylococcal species direct from blood cultures and rule out Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a post-hoc analysis of the RAPIDO trial

Introduction

Rapid differentiation between Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) is critical in clinical infection. Direct matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) identification from blood culture is highly accurate, but is associated with a significant failure rate, delaying identification. However, MALDI-TOF failure may itself be indicative of CoNS infection.

Aim

We sought to examine whether failure of MALDI-TOF direct ID was indicative of CoNS infection and could be used as a diagnostic tool to promote antimicrobial stewardship.

Methodology

Results of Gram stains, MALDI-TOF identification and formal identification were extracted from the large, multi-centre RAPIDO trial. All blood cultures with presumed staphylococci were included. MALDI-TOF performance (correct identification, incorrect identification, failed identification) was calculated for each sample and across sites. Risk of SA disease was calculated for each group (correct, incorrect, failed) and across sites. Logistic regression was used to identify if clinical features are associated with MALDI-TOF performance.

Results

In the RAPIDO trial, 4312 patients were allocated to the MALDI-TOF arm. After exclusions, 880 patients were eligible and had a blood culture with a Gram stain consistent with presumed staphylococci. In total, 204 of these (23.2 %) were ultimately identified as SA. MALDI-ID was successful 83.9 % of the time, and was 100 % accurate when successful. Failure was more common in CoNS isolates (124/641, 19.3 %) than in SA (13/191, 6.4 %). When MALDI-TOF failed, the risk of SA disease was 9.2 % across the whole cohort, although failure rates and risk of SA disease varied significantly between centres. MALDI-TOF failure was independent of clinical characteristics.

Conclusion

Presumed staphylococci that fail direct MALDI-TOF identification from blood culture are significantly more likely to be CoNS isolates than SA. In low-risk or low-prevalence settings, SA therapy can be withheld if MALDI-TOF is unsuccessful.