Aortic 18F-FDG PET/CT hypermetabolism in patients with long COVID: a retrospective study

Time-Related Vascular Inflammatory Response to COVID-19 Assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Follow-Up Tumor Patients

Purpose

This study aimed to assess COVID-19's effects on vascular inflammatory response, by evaluating 18-Fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake via positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the artery of diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients before and after infection with COVID-19.

Patients and Methods

Thirty-five DLBCL patients administered the chemotherapy regimen R-CHOP and examined by oncological ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging twice from August 2022 to February 2023 for pre-treatment evaluation or assessment of treatment efficacy were enrolled. Seventeen patients were confirmed with COVID-19 within the study period. Arterial wall FDG uptake was semi-quantitatively analyzed as TBR (target-to-blood pool ratio) in 14 different vascular regions using oncological ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT. Based on COVID-19 course and the two PET/CT scans, we further analyzed time-related FDG uptake for vascular walls in DLBCL patients with COVID-19.

Results

Arterial TBRs were higher in the last PET/CT examination than previous ones in all patients with or without COVID-19. Besides the ascending aorta, ΔTBR (last PET/CT scanning's TBR minus previous PET/CT scanning's TBR) were not significantly different between the COVID-19 and Control groups. However, cases scanned ≤30 days from infection had remarkably higher ΔTBRs in comparison with those assessed >30 days post-infection in the COVID-19 group (p<0.05). A moderate inverse correlation was observed between ∆Global TBR (last PET/CT scanning's average TBR value minus previous PET/CT scanning's average TBR value) and time distance from COVID-19 onset to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan (Spearman's rho=-0.591, P=0.012). Interestingly, there were no differences of changes of TBR between different purpose of PET/CT examination group.

Conclusion

This work firstly suggested vascular inflammation is elevated in the early post-COVID-19 phase in DLBCL cases compared with prolonged post-COVID-19 phase or controls. Increasing attention should be paid to these patients and the protection of their vascular function and complications in early COVID-19.

Time-related aortic inflammatory response, as assessed with 18F-FDG PET/CT, in patients hospitalized with severely or critical COVID-19: the COVAIR study

AIM

Arterial involvement has been implicated in the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19). Fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging is a valuable tool for the assessment of aortic inflammation and is a predictor of outcome. We sought to prospectively assess the presence of aortic inflammation and its time-dependent trend in patients with COVID-19.

METHODS

Between November 2020 and May 2021, in this pilot, case-control study, we recruited 20 patients with severe or critical COVID-19 (mean age of 59 ± 12 years), while 10 age and sex-matched individuals served as the control group. Aortic inflammation was assessed by measuring 18F-FDG uptake in PET/CT performed 20-120 days post-admission. Global aortic target to background ratio (GLA-TBR) was calculated as the sum of TBRs of ascending and descending aorta, aortic arch, and abdominal aorta divided by 4. Index aortic segment TBR (IAS-TBR) was designated as the aortic segment with the highest TBR.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in aortic 18F-FDG PET/CT uptake between patients and controls (GLA-TBR: 1.46 [1.40-1.57] vs. 1.43 [1.32-1.70], respectively, P = 0.422 and IAS-TBR: 1.60 [1.50-1.67] vs. 1.50 [1.42-1.61], respectively, P = 0.155). There was a moderate correlation between aortic TBR values (both GLA and IAS) and time distance from admission to 18F-FDG PET-CT scan (Spearman's rho = - 0.528, P = 0.017 and Spearman's rho = - 0.480, p = 0.032, respectively). Patients who were scanned less than or equal to 60 days from admission (n = 11) had significantly higher GLA-TBR values compared to patients that were examined more than 60 days post-admission (GLA-TBR: 1.53 [1.42-1.60] vs. 1.40 [1.33-1.45], respectively, P = 0.016 and IAS-TBR: 1.64 [1.51-1.74] vs. 1.52 [1.46-1.60], respectively, P = 0.038). There was a significant difference in IAS- TBR between patients scanned ≤ 60 days and controls (1.64 [1.51-1.74] vs. 1.50 [1.41-1.61], P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study suggesting that aortic inflammation, as assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, is increased in the early post COVID phase in patients with severe or critical COVID-19 and largely resolves over time. Our findings may have important implications for the understanding of the course of the disease and for improving our preventive and therapeutic strategies.

Evidence mapping and review of long-COVID and its underlying pathophysiological mechanism

PURPOSE

Apart from the global disease burden of acute COVID-19 disease, the health complications arising after recovery have been recognized as a long-COVID or post-COVID-19 syndrome. Evidences of long-COVID symptoms involving various organ systems are rapidly growing in literature. The objective was to perform a rapid review and evidence mapping of systemic complications and symptoms of long-COVID and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms.

METHODS

Publications reporting clinical trials, observational cohort studies, case-control studies, case-series, meta-analysis, and systematic reviews, focusing on the squeal of the disease, consequences of COVID-19 treatment/hospitalization, long-COVID, chronic COVID syndrome, and post acute COVID-19 were reviewed in detail for the narrative synthesis of frequency, duration, risk factors, and pathophysiology.

RESULTS

The review highlights that pulmonary, neuro-psychological, and cardiovascular complications are major findings in most epidemiological studies. However, dysfunctional gastrointestinal, endocrine, and metabolic health are recent findings for which underlying pathophysiological mechanisms are poorly understood. Analysis of the clinical trial landscape suggests that more than 50% of the industry-sponsored trials are focused on pulmonary symptoms. In contrast to the epidemiological trends and academic trials, cardiovascular complications are not a focus of industry-sponsored trials, suggestive of the gaps in the research efforts.

CONCLUSION

The gap in epidemiological trends and academic trials, particularly concerning cardiovascular complications not being a focus of industry-sponsored trials is suggestive of the gaps in research efforts and longer follow-up durations would help identify other long-COVID-related health issues such as reproductive health and fertility.

New Onset of Autoimmune Diseases Following COVID-19 Diagnosis

There is growing evidence that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to a dysregulation of the immune system with the development of autoimmune phenomena. The consequence of this immune dysregulation ranges from the production of autoantibodies to the onset of rheumatic autoimmune disease. In this context, we conducted a systematic review to analyze the current data regarding the new-onset systemic and rheumatic autoimmune diseases in COVID-19 patients. A literature search in PubMed and Scopus databases from December 2019 to September 2021 identified 99 patients that fulfilled the specific diagnostic/classification criteria and/or nomenclature for each rheumatic autoimmune disease. The main diseases reported were vasculitis and arthritis. Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, systemic lupus erythematosus, and sarcoidosis were also reported in a limited number of patients, as well as isolated cases of systemic sclerosis and adult-onset Still's disease. These findings highlight the potential spectrum of systemic and rheumatic autoimmune diseases that could be precipitated by SARS-CoV-2 infection. Complementary studies are needed to discern the link between the SARS-CoV-2 and new onset-rheumatic diseases so that this knowledge can be used in early diagnosis and the most suitable management.