Evaluation of the inoculum effect of new antibiotics against carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales

Role of volume and inoculum in MIC assessment: a study with meropenem and Klebsiella pneumoniae

OBJECTIVES

Pharmacodynamic parameters evaluated under conditions that simulate an infection site volume and microbial load might reveal hidden risks of resistance selection and subsequent treatment failure. The study aimed to investigate the predictive potential of MICs determined at various conditions on the antimicrobial effect and emergence of resistance.

METHODS

We assessed meropenem MICs (microdilution: 0.2 mL, 5 × 105 cfu/mL; macrodilution: 2 mL, 5 × 105 cfu/mL), MICHVs (220 mL, 5 × 105 cfu/mL), MICHIs (0.2 mL, 5 × 107 cfu/mL) and MICHVIs (220 mL, 5 × 107 cfu/mL) for five Klebsiella pneumoniae strains and analysed these values alongside the results of experiments in a dynamic in vitro model. A clinically relevant meropenem dosing regimen was simulated and the starting bacterial inocula were 106 and 108 cfu/mL.

RESULTS

The effectiveness of meropenem agreed with MICHVs for the 106 cfu/mL inoculum and with MICHIs or MICHVIs for the 108 cfu/mL inoculum. Strains characterized as resistant according to these values grew during meropenem exposure, and resistant mutants were selected.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that MICHV-based parameters may be suitable for predicting antibacterial effects and the risk of resistance development when the inoculum is 106 cfu/mL, while MICHI- or MICHVI-based parameters are suitable for these purposes when the inoculum is 108 cfu/mL. Also, the correlation between resistance selection and the MICHI-based parameter was as high as one that corresponds with a mutant prevention concentration (MPC)-based parameter; this suggests that the MPC can be replaced by the more easily determined alternative parameter MICHI.

Challenges Facing Two Outbreaks of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: From Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing to the Emergence of Cefiderocol-Resistant Mutants

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections are associated with poor outcomes depending on patient's conditions, clinical severity and type of infection, and treatment is challenging given the limited therapeutic options available. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of two outbreaks caused by CRAB in an intensive care unit (ICU). In addition, the mechanisms of resistance detected in these strains and the treatment chosen according to the available therapeutic options were analyzed. Overall, 28 patients were included. Ten patients (35.71%) had ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ten (35.71%) had a bloodstream infection (BSI), and eight (28.57%) were only colonized. Recurrent infection occurred in 25% (5/20) of infected patients. Two different strains of A. baumannii were isolated from the index patient of the first outbreak. The first strain belonged to the ST85 and carried the blaNDM-1 carbapenemase gene, while the second belonged to the ST2 and carried blaOXA-23, and blaOXA-66 carbapenemase genes. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the ST2 strain was the cause of the major outbreak, and mutations in the AmpC gene were related to progressive increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and finally, cefiderocol-resistance in one strain. The CRAB isolates from the second outbreak were also identified as ST2. Cefiderocol-resistant strains tests identified by the disc diffusion method were involved in 24% (6/25) of nosocomial infections. Using broth microdilution (BMD) ComASP® only, 33.3% (2/6) of these strains were cefiderocol-resistant. All-cause ICU mortality was 21.4%. Conclusions: Cefiderocol is the first approved siderophore cephalosporin for the treatment of CRAB infections. Cefiderocol-resistant strains were related with blaNDM-1 carbapenemase and mutations in the AmpC gene. Cefiderocol-resistant strains or that cannot be properly interpreted by disk diffusion, should be retested using BMD for definitive categorization.

Comparison of Different Methods for Assaying the In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains: Influence of Bacterial Inoculum

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections represent a critical public health concern, highlighting the need for the development of effective antibiotics. Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, particularly in strains that are resistant to other drugs. However, concerns regarding the emergence of drug-resistant strains persist. This study, conducted with 109 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from the Spanish Hospital (Dr. Balmis, Alicante). The study evaluated susceptibility to cefiderocol in comparison to alternative antibiotics and including their susceptibility to bacterial inoculum, while assessing various testing methods. Our findings revealed high susceptibility to cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant strains, with only 2 of 109 strains exhibiting resistance. Comparative analysis demonstrated superiority of cefiderocol towards alternative antibiotics. Both the E-test and disk-diffusion methods showed 100% concordance with the microdilution method in classifying strains as susceptible or resistant. However, 4.6% (5/109) of disc zone diameters fell within the technical uncertainty zone, so the E-test technique was found to be more useful in routine clinical practice. Additionally, escalating bacterial inoculum correlated with decreases in vitro activity, so this parameter should be adjusted very carefully in in vivo studies. This study underscores cefiderocol's potential as a therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. However, the emergence of drug-resistant strains emphasizes the critical need for a wise use of antibiotics and a continuous monitoring of resistance to antibiotics. Based on our in vitro data, further investigation concerning the impact of bacterial inoculum on drug efficacy is warranted in order to detect resistance mechanisms and optimize treatment strategies, thereby mitigating the risk of resistance.

Progress of disinfection catalysts in advanced oxidation processes, mechanisms and synergistic antibiotic degradation

Human diseases caused by pathogenic microorganisms make people pay more attention to disinfection. Meanwhile, antibiotics can cause microbial resistance and increase the difficulty of disease treatment, resulting in risk of triggering a vicious circle. Advanced oxidation process (AOPs) has been widely studied in the field of synergistic treatment of the two contaminates. This paper reviews the application of catalytic materials and their modification strategies in the context of AOPs for disinfection and antibiotic degradation. It also delves into the mechanisms of disinfection such as the pathways for microbial inactivation and the related influencing factors, which are essential for understanding the pivotal role of catalytic materials in disinfection principles by AOPs. More importantly, the exploratory research on the combined use of AOPs for disinfection and antibiotic degradation is discussed, and the potential and prospects in this field is highlighted. Finally, the limitations and challenges associated with the application of AOPs in disinfection and antibiotic degradation are summarized. It aims to provide a starting point for future research efforts to facilitate the widespread use of advanced oxidation processes in the field of public health.

Sepsis Stewardship: The Puzzle of Antibiotic Therapy in the Context of Individualization of Decision Making

The main recent change observed in the field of critical patient infection has been universal awareness of the need to make better use of antimicrobials, especially for the most serious cases, beyond the application of simple and effective formulas or rigid protocols. The increase in resistant microorganisms, the quantitative increase in major surgeries and interventional procedures in the highest risk patients, and the appearance of a significant number of new antibiotics in recent years (some very specifically directed against certain mechanisms of resistance and others with a broader spectrum of applications) have led us to shift our questions from "what to deal with" to "how to treat". There has been controversy about how best to approach antibiotic treatment of complex cases of sepsis. The individualized and adjusted dosage, the moment of its administration, the objective, and the selection of the regimen are pointed out as factors of special relevance in a critically ill patient where the frequency of resistant microorganisms, especially among the Enterobacterales group, and the emergence of multiple and diverse antibiotic treatment alternatives have made the appropriate choice of antibiotic treatment more complex, requiring a constant updating of knowledge and the creation of multidisciplinary teams to confront new infections that are difficult to treat. In this article, we have reviewed the phenomenon of the emergence of resistance to antibacterials and we have tried to share some of the ideas, such as stewardship, sparing carbapenems, and organizational, microbiological, pharmacological, and knowledge tools, that we have considered most useful and effective for individualized decision making that takes into account the current context of multidrug resistance. The greatest challenge, therefore, of decision making in this context lies in determining an effective, optimal, and balanced empirical antibiotic treatment.

Inoculum effect of CTX-M-15, OXA-48, and KPC-2 producing Klebsiella pneumoniae on meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam efficacy

The inoculum effect, characterized by diminished antibacterial activity at high bacterial inocula, is studied in the context of beta-lactam and beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations against beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales. The inhibition of ESBL + OXA-48 and KPC enzymes, in combination with ceftazidime, demonstrates encouraging results. In this study, 20 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were tested with different inocula (1-5 × 105 and 1-5 × 107 cfu/ml) using broth microdilution methods. The inoculum effect was observed in meropenem against OXA-48 + CTX-M-15- and KPC-2-producing isolates but not with ceftazidime/avibactam. Notably, meropenem exhibited inoculum effect against carbapenemase-producing strains, whereas ceftazidime-avibactam remained effective. We conclude that ceftazidime-avibactam is recommended for high-inoculum infections.

Heteroresistance to cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in the CREDIBLE-CR study was not linked to clinical outcomes: a post hoc analysis

IMPORTANCE

The population analysis profiling (PAP) test is considered the "gold standard" method to detect heteroresistance. It exposes bacteria to increasing concentrations of antibiotics at high cell densities to detect any minority resistant subpopulations that might be missed by the low inoculums used for reference susceptibility tests. However, its clinical relevance has not been well established. In the CREDIBLE-CR study, a numerically increased all-cause mortality was observed in the cefiderocol arm relative to the best available therapy arm for patients with Acinetobacter spp. infections. Heteroresistance has independently been proposed by another research group as a potential explanation of the mortality difference. An analysis of the baseline carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter calcoaceticus-baumannii complex isolates from patients treated with cefiderocol in the CREDIBLE-CR study showed the highest clinical cure rate and the lowest mortality for patients with PAP-heteroresistant isolates compared with PAP-susceptible or PAP-resistant isolates. These findings contradict the abovementioned hypothesis that heteroresistance contributed to the increased mortality.

Comparison of the inoculum effect of in vitro antibacterial activity of Imipenem/relebactam and Ceftazidime/avibactam against ESBL-, KPC- and AmpC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate effect of inoculum size of extended-spectrum β-Lactamase (ESBL)-producing-, AmpC-producing-, and KPC-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae on the in vitro antibacterial effects of imipenem/relebactam (IMR) and ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA).

METHODS

We compared the impact of inoculum size on IMR and CZA of sixteen clinical isolates and three standard isolates through antimicrobial susceptibility tests, time-kill assays and in vitro PK/PD studies.

RESULTS

When inoculum size increased from 105 to 107 CFU/mL, an inoculum effect was observed for 26.3% (5/19) and 52.6% (10/19) of IMR and CZA, respectively; time-kill assays revealed that the concentration of CZA increased from ≥ 4 × MIC to 16 × MIC to reach 99.9% killing rate against K. pneumoniae ATCC-BAA 1705 (KPC-2-, OXA-9- and SHV-182-producing) and 60,700 (SHV-27- and DHA-1-producing). While for IMR, a concentration from 1 × MIC to 4 × MIC killed 99.9% of the four strains. When the inoculum size increased to 109 CFU/mL, neither IMR nor CZA showed a detectable antibacterial effect, even at a high concentration. An in vitro PK/PD study revealed a clear bactericidal effect when IMR administered as 1.25 g q6h when inoculum size increased.

CONCLUSION

An inoculum effect on CZA was observed more frequent than that on IMR. Among the β-lactamase-producing strains, the inoculum effect was most common for SHV-producing and KPC-producing strains.

Global Resistance of Imipenem/Relebactam against Gram-Negative Bacilli: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Relebactam, previously known as MK-7655, is currently being tested in combination with imipenem as a class A and class C β-lactamase inhibitor, including KPC from Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Objective

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the activity of imipenem/relebactam against gram-negative bacilli.

Methods

After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria, 72 articles with full texts that describe the prevalence of imipenem/relebactam resistance were chosen for the meta-analysis and systematic review. Articles published between January 2015 and February 2023 were surveyed. The systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus.

Results

The pooled estimation of 282,621 sample isolates revealed that the prevalence rate of imipenem/relebactam resistance is roughly 14.6% (95% CI, 0.116%-0.182%).

Conclusions

The findings of this analysis show that imipenem/relebactam resistance is rare in the majority of developed countries. Given that relebactam has proven to restore the activity of imipenem against current clinical isolates, further research into imipenem/relebactam is necessary.

Development of a whole-cell biosensor for β-lactamase inhibitor discovery

The production of β-lactamases by bacterial pathogens endangers antimicrobial therapy, and new inhibitors for β-lactamases are urgently needed. We report the development of a luminescent-based biosensor that quantifies β-lactamase inhibition in a cellular context, based on the activation of transcriptional factor AmpR following the exposure of bacterial cells to β-lactams. This rapid method can account for factors like membrane permeability and can be employed to identify new β-lactamase inhibitors.

In vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy with ceftazidime-avibactam-containing combination regimens against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates or infections: a scoping review

Introduction

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) infections are associated with a high risk of morbidity, mortality, and treatment costs. We aimed to evaluate in vitro, in vivo and clinical studies comparing the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) combination regimens with CZA alone against CRE and/or MDR-PA isolates or infections.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the relevant literature in CINAHL/MEDLINE, Pubmed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus until December 1, 2022. Review articles, grey literature, abstracts, comments, editorials, non-peer reviewed articles, non-English articles, and in vitro synergy studies conducted on single isolates were excluded.

Results

22 in vitro, 7 in vivo and 20 clinical studies were evaluated. In vitro studies showed reliable synergy between CZA and aztreonam against metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing isolates. Some studies indicated good in vitro synergy between CZA and amikacin, meropenem, fosfomycin and polymyxins against CRE isolates. For MDR-PA isolates, there are comparatively fewer in vitro or in vivo studies. In observational clinical studies, mortality, clinical cure, adverse events, and development of CZA resistance after exposure were generally similar in monotherapy and combination therapy groups. However, antibiotic-related nephrotoxicity and infection relapses were higher in patients receiving CZA combination therapies.

Discussion

The benefit, if any, of CZA combination regimens in MDR-PA infections is elusive, as very few clinical studies have included these infections. There is no currently documented clinical benefit for the use of CZA combination regimens rather than CZA monotherapy. CZA combined with aztreonam for serious infections due to MBL producers should be evaluated by randomized controlled trials.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=278552, CRD42021278552.

Clonal dissemination of Klebsiella pneumoniae resistant to cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam co-producing KPC and OXA-181 carbapenemase

Objectives

Herein, we describe the epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Also, we report the emergence of an outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae strains co-producing KPC and OXA-181 carbapenemase, resistant to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (βL-βLICs) and cefiderocol.

Methods

CPE were collected during a period of 3 years from 2019 to 2021. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for novel βL-βLICs and cefiderocol was performed by MIC test strips and microdilution with iron-depleted broth. WGS was performed on 10 selected isolates using the Illumina platform, and resistome analysis was carried out by a web-based pipeline.

Results

Between January 2019 and December 2021, we collected 1430 carbapenemase producers from 957 patients with infections due to CPE. KPC was the most common carbapenemase, followed by VIM, OXA-48 and NDM. During 2021, we identified 78 K. pneumoniae co-producing KPC and OXA-181 carbapenemases in 60 patients, resistant to meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam. Resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol was observed respectively in 7 and 8 out of the 10 sequenced K. pneumoniae. Genome analysis showed that all isolates were clonally related, shared a common porin and plasmid content, and carried blaOXA-181 and blaKPC carbapenemases. Specifically, 4 out of 10 isolates carried blaKPC-3, while 6 harboured mutated blaKPC. Of note, KPC producers resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam and harbouring mutated blaKPC exhibited higher MICs of cefiderocol (median MIC 16 mg/L, IQR 16-16) than strains harbouring WT blaKPC-3 (cefiderocol 9 mg/L, IQR 1.5-16).

Conclusions

Our results highlight the need for continuous monitoring of CPE to limit widespread MDR pathogens carrying multiple mechanisms conferring resistance to novel antimicrobial molecules.

Rationale and evidence for the use of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations and cefiderocol in critically ill patients

BACKGROUND

Healthcare-associated infections involving Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotype are associated with impaired patient-centered outcomes and poses daily therapeutic challenges in most of intensive care units worldwide. Over the recent years, four innovative β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) combinations (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam and meropenem-vaborbactam) and a new siderophore cephalosporin (cefiderocol) have been approved for the treatment of certain DTR-GNB infections. The literature addressing their microbiological spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety was exhaustively audited by our group to support the recent guidelines of the French Intensive Care Society on their utilization in critically ill patients. This narrative review summarizes the available evidence and unanswered questions on these issues.

METHODS

A systematic search for English-language publications in PUBMED and the Cochrane Library database from inception to November 15, 2022.

RESULTS

These drugs have demonstrated relevant clinical success rates and a reduced renal risk in most of severe infections for whom polymyxin- and/or aminoglycoside-based regimen were historically used as last-resort strategies-namely, ceftazidime-avibactam for infections due to Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)- or OXA-48-like-producing Enterobacterales, meropenem-vaborbactam for KPC-producing Enterobacterales, ceftazidime-avibactam/aztreonam combination or cefiderocol for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, and ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam for non-MBL-producing DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. However, limited clinical evidence exists in critically ill patients. Extended-infusion scheme (except for imipenem-relebactam) may be indicated for DTR-GNB with high minimal inhibitory concentrations and/or in case of augmented renal clearance. The potential benefit of combining these agents with other antimicrobials remains under-investigated, notably for the most severe presentations. Other important knowledge gaps include pharmacokinetic information in particular situations (e.g., pneumonia, other deep-seated infections, and renal replacement therapy), the hazard of treatment-emergent resistance and possible preventive measures, the safety of high-dose regimen, the potential usefulness of rapid molecular diagnostic tools to rationalize their empirical utilization, and optimal treatment durations. Comparative clinical, ecological, and medico-economic data are needed for infections in whom two or more of these agents exhibit in vitro activity against the causative pathogen.

CONCLUSIONS

New BL/BLI combinations and cefiderocol represent long-awaited options for improving the management of DTR-GNB infections. Several research axes must be explored to better define the positioning and appropriate administration scheme of these drugs in critically ill patients.

The place of new antibiotics for Gram-negative bacterial infections in intensive care: report of a consensus conference

INTRODUCTION

New beta-lactams, associated or not with beta-lactamase inhibitors (NBs/BIs), can respond to the spread of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteriales and nonfermenting carbapenem-resistant bacteria. The risk of emergence of resistance to these NBs/BIs makes guidelines necessary. The SRLF organized a consensus conference in December 2022.

METHODS

An ad hoc committee without any conflict of interest (CoI) with the subject identified the molecules (ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and cefiderocol); defined 6 generic questions; drew up a list of subquestions according to the population, intervention, comparison and outcomes (PICO) model; and reviewed the literature using predefined keywords. The quality of the data was assessed using the GRADE methodology. Seven experts in the field proposed their own answers to the questions in a public session and answered questions from the jury (a panel of 10 critical-care physicians without any CoI) and the public. The jury then met alone for 48 h to write its recommendations. Due to the frequent lack of powerful studies that have used clinically important criteria of judgment, the recommendations were formulated as expert opinions as often as necessary.

RESULTS

The jury provided 17 statements answering 6 questions: (1) Is there a place in the ICU for the probabilistic use of new NBs/IBs active against Gram-negative bacteria? (2) In the context of documented infections with sensitivity to several of these molecules, are there pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, ecological or medico-economic elements for prioritization? (3) What are the possible combinations with these molecules and in what context? (4) Should we integrate these new molecules into a carbapenem-sparing strategy? (5) What pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are available to optimize their mode of administration in critically ill patients? (6) What are the dosage adaptations in cases of renal insufficiency, hepatocellular insufficiency or obesity?

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should optimize the use of NBs/BIs in ICU patients.

In Vitro Activities and Inoculum Effects of Cefiderocol and Aztreonam-Avibactam against Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae

Cefiderocol and aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) both had activity against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli, including those that produce metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). We compared the in vitro activities and inoculum effects of these antibiotics against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), especially MBL-producing isolates. The MICs of cefiderocol and ATM-AVI were determined using broth microdilution method for a 2016 to 2021 collection of Enterobacteriaceae isolates which produced MBL, KPC, or OXA-48-like carbapenemases. MICs with high bacteria inoculum were also evaluated for susceptible isolates. A total of 195 CPE were tested, including 143 MBL- (74 NDM, 42 IMP, and 27 VIM), 38 KPC-, and 14 OXA-48-like-producing isolates. The susceptible rates of MBL-, KPC-, and OXA-48-like producers to cefiderocol were 86.0%, 92.1%, and 92.9%, respectively, and that to ATM-AVI were 95.8%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. NDM producers displayed lower susceptibility and higher MIC50s/MIC90s of cefiderocol (78.4%, 2/16 mg/L) than IMP (92.9%, 0.375/4 mg/L) and VIM (96.3%, 1/4 mg/L) producers. NDM- and VIM-producing Escherichia coli showed lower susceptibility to ATM-AVI (77.3% and 75.0%, respectively) compared to MBL-CPE of other species (100% susceptible). Inoculum effects for cefiderocol and ATM-AVI were observed among 95.9% and 95.2% of susceptible CPE, respectively. A switch from susceptible to resistant category was observed in 83.6% (143/171) of isolates for cefiderocol and 94.7% (179/189) for ATM-AVI. Our results revealed that NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae had lower susceptibility to cefiderocol and ATM-AVI. Prominent inoculum effects on both antibiotics were observed for CPE, which suggested a risk of microbiological failure when they were used for CPE infections with high bacteria burden. IMPORTANCE The prevalence of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is increasing worldwide. Currently, therapeutic options for metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae remain limited. We demonstrated that clinical metallo-β-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates were highly susceptible to cefiderocol (86.0%) and aztreonam-avibactam (ATM-AVI) (95.8%). However, inoculum effects on cefiderocol and ATM-AVI were observed for over 90% of susceptible carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates. Our findings highlight a potential risk of microbiological failure when using monotherapy with cefiderocol or ATM-AVI to treat severe CPE infection.

Novel Antimicrobial Agents for Gram-Negative Pathogens

Gram-negative bacterial resistance to antimicrobials has had an exponential increase at a global level during the last decades and represent an everyday challenge, especially for the hospital practice of our era. Concerted efforts from the researchers and the industry have recently provided several novel promising antimicrobials, resilient to various bacterial resistance mechanisms. There are new antimicrobials that became commercially available during the last five years, namely, cefiderocol, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, eravacycline, omadacycline, and plazomicin. Furthermore, other agents are in advanced development, having reached phase 3 clinical trials, namely, aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-enmetazobactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, cefepime-zidebactam, sulopenem, tebipenem, and benapenem. In this present review, we critically discuss the characteristics of the above-mentioned antimicrobials, their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties and the current clinical data.

Comparison of Broth Microdilution, Disk Diffusion and Strip Test Methods for Cefiderocol Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

The aim of this study was to compare the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method with the Disk Diffusion (DD) test and strip test against a collection of 75 well-characterized Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical strains to assess cefiderocol (CFD) antimicrobial activity. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on KPC-Kp strains by Illumina iSeq100 platform. The Categorical Agreement (CA) between the BMD method and DD test was 92% (69/75) with a Major Error (ME) of 16.7% (6/36). Additionally, the CA between the BMD method and test strip was 90.7% (68/75) with a Very Major Error (VME) of 17.9% (7/39) and 82.7% (62/75) between the strip test and DD with a ME of 30.2%. KPC-Kp strains showing resistance to CFD were 27 out of 75 (36%) by three methods. Specifically, 51.9% (14/27) of KPC-Kp resistant to CFD harbored bla_KPC-3, while 48.1% (13/27) harbored mutated bla_KPC-3. Moreover, KPC-Kp strains carrying a mutated bla_KPC-3 gene exhibited high MIC values (p value < 0.001) compared to wild-type bla_KPC-3. In conclusion, the DD test resulted as a valid alternative to the BMD method to determine the in vitro susceptibility to CFD, while the strip test exhibited major limitations.