Global prevalence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Resistance profiles of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in a large centre in England: are we already losing cefiderocol?

BACKGROUND

Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) pose difficult therapeutic challenges. We aimed to characterize antimicrobial resistance profiles of CPE in our centre.

METHODS

All non-duplicate CPE isolates between 1 August 2020 and 31 August 2023 in a large teaching trust in England were retrospectively studied. Cefiderocol antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using disc diffusion, ceftazidime/avibactam using disc diffusion and gradient diffusion, and ceftazidime/avibactam aztreonam synergy using the double disc diffusion method. EUCAST version 14.0 breakpoints were used.

RESULTS

A total of 158 CPE from 136 patients were isolated. Most patients were colonized with CPE, but only 16.9% had active infections. Thirty-day all-cause mortality was 10.3%, increasing to 13% for patients with infections and to 18.2% for bacteraemias. OXA-48 was the most prevalent carbapenemase (48.1%), followed by NDM (38%). All isolates exhibited MDR profiles, with high levels of resistance to meropenem (41.1%). Resistance to cefiderocol was found in 69.7% of NDM-producing isolates, with a further 18.2% in the area of technical uncertainty. Ceftazidime/avibactam and aztreonam synergy was seen in 87.5% of isolates, whereas colistin and fosfomycin susceptibility remained high (98.1% and 97.2%, respectively). All OXA-48-producing isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, and 15.3% were resistant to cefiderocol. No patients had been exposed to cefiderocol beforehand, whereas three had been exposed to ceftazidime/avibactam. The most common risk factor for CPE isolation was travel and receiving healthcare abroad, especially in Asia.

CONCLUSIONS

We found high rates of resistance to cefiderocol in CPE isolates without prior cefiderocol exposure. Our results prohibit empirical use of cefiderocol for the treatment of CPE infections in our setting.

Activity of cefiderocol in combination with tetracycline analogues against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii

Therapeutic options for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CA-AB) are quite limited. Cefiderocol, a novel siderophore cephalosporin, has shown potent in vitro activity against CR-AB, and new tetracycline analogues such as eravacycline and omadacycline have been available in recent years. However, the synergism of cefiderocol with tetracycline analogues against CR-AB has not been well investigated. In this study, we evaluated the in vitro synergistic activity of cefiderocol in combination with tetracycline analogues (minocycline, tigecycline, eravacycline and omadacycline) against 48 clinical isolates of CR-AB by checkerboard methods and time-kill assays. Then we further verified the in vitro results with neutropenic murine thigh-infection models. Among 48 tested isolates tested with checkerboard methods, 35.4%, 33.3%, 50.0% and 37.5% showed synergistic interactions (FICI ≤ 0.5) in cefiderocol-minocycline combination, cefiderocol-tigecycline combination, cefiderocol-eravacycline combination and cefiderocol-omadacycline combination, respectively. None of the combinations exhibited any antagonistic interactions. In the time-kill assays, cefiderocol combined with tetracycline analogues showed synergistic effects in most isolates. Animal models found that combination therapy could reduce cell counts by nearly 2 log10 CFU/thigh compared with the monotherapy in the AB-2 isolate who was susceptible to minocycline (MIC = 4 mg/l). But for the AB-26 who was resistant to minocycline, the decrease of bacterial cell counts was less than 1 log10 CFU/thigh compared with cefiderocol monotherapy in the cefiderocol-minocycline, cefiderocol-tigecycline and cefiderocol-omadacycline therapies; while the cefiderocol-eravacycline combination could still reduce the bacterial cell counts nearly 2 log10 CFU/thigh compared with the monotherapy. In summary, the cefiderocol-eravacycline combination seems to be a promising therapeutic strategy for treating CR-AB infections.

Updates on the Activity, Efficacy and Emerging Mechanisms of Resistance to Cefiderocol

In recent years, novel antimicrobials have been developed to counter the emergence of antimicrobial resistance and provide effective therapeutic options against multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Cefiderocol, a siderophore cephalosporin, represents a novel valuable antimicrobial drug for the treatment of infections caused by MDR-GNB. The mechanism of cefiderocol to penetrate through the outer membrane of bacterial cells, termed "Trojan horse", makes this antimicrobial drug unique and immune to the various resistance strategies adopted by GNB. Its broad spectrum of action, potent antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics properties, safety, and tolerability make cefiderocol a key drug for the treatment of infections due to MDR strains. Although this novel antimicrobial molecule contributed to revolutionizing the therapeutic armamentarium against MDR-GNB, the recent emergence of cefiderocol-resistant strains has redefined its role in clinical practice and required new strategies to preserve its antibacterial activity. In this review, we provide an updated discussion regarding the mechanism of action, emerging mechanisms of resistance, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties, and efficacy data of cefiderocol against the major Gram-negative bacteria and future prospects.

Cefiderocol susceptibility of 146 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains clinically isolated from blood in two Japanese hospitals over a 10-year period

Previous reports focusing on cefiderocol susceptibility against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia have included a large number of noninvasive or colonized isolates, and data focusing on invasive S. maltophilia strains are still lacking. We retrospectively investigated the cefiderocol susceptibility of stored S. maltophilia strains that caused bacteremia at two Japanese hospitals. The MIC50 and MIC90 were 0.06 μg/mL and 0.25 μg/mL, respectively, while the susceptibility rate was 99.3% (current CLSI breakpoint criteria). Our results provide the MIC distribution of bacteremic S. maltophilia isolates in Japan and show the preserved cefiderocol susceptibility of S. maltophilia among clinically invasive pathogenic strains.

Recent updates in treating carbapenem-resistant infections in patients with hematological malignancies

INTRODUCTION

Patients with hematological malignancies (PHMs) are at increased risk for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs) due to frequent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics and prolonged hospital stays. These infections result in high mortality and morbidity rates along with delays in chemotherapy, longer hospitalizations, and increased health care costs.

AREAS COVERED

Treatment alternatives for CRO infections in PHMs.

EXPERT OPINION

The best available treatment option for KPC and OXA-48 producers is ceftazidime/avibactam. Imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam and meropenem/vaborbactam remain as the alternative options. They can also be used as salvage therapy in KPC-positive Enterobacterales infections resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam, if in vitro susceptibility is shown. Treatment of metallo-β-lactamase producers is an unmet need. Ceftazidime/avibactam plus aztreonam or aztreonam/avibactam seems to be the most reliable option for metallo-β-lactamase producers. As a first-line option for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, ceftolozane/tazobactam is preferable and ceftazidime/avibactam and imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam constitute alternative regimens. Although sulbactam/durlobactam is the most reliable option against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections, its utility as monotherapy and in PHMs is not yet known. Cefiderocol can be selected as a 'last-resort' option for CRO infections. New risk score models supported by artificial intelligence algorithms can be used to predict the exact risk of infections in previously colonized patients.

National Multicenter Study on the Prevalence of Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in the Post-COVID-19 Era in Argentina: The RECAPT-AR Study

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the global antimicrobial resistance (AMR) crisis. Consequently, it is more urgent than ever to prioritize AMR containment and support countries in improving the detection, characterization, and rapid response to emerging AMR threats. We conducted a prospective, multicenter study to assess the prevalence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in infectious processes in Argentina during the post-COVID-19 pandemic period and explore therapeutic alternatives for their treatment (RECAPT-AR study).

METHODS

A total of 182 hospitals participated by submitting Enterobacterales clinical isolates to the National Reference Laboratory (NRL) during the first three weeks of November 2021. Inclusion criteria were defined as an ertapenem MIC ≥ 0.5 mg/L, a zone diameter ≤ 22 mm. Carbapenemase genes and those coding for major extended-spectrum β-lactamases were molecularly characterized using multiplex PCR at the NRL. Antibiotic susceptibility testing followed international standards (CLSI and EUCAST).

RESULTS

The NRL analyzed 821 Enterobacterales isolates. Metallo-β-lactamase (MBL, 42.0%) and KPC (39.8%) accounted for 81.8% of carbapenemases, followed by OXA-163 (7.4%), a variant of OXA-48 with additional activity against extended-spectrum cephalosporins, and enzyme combinations (8.3%). These combinations included NDM plus KPC (3.4%), OXA-163 plus KPC (2.4%), and OXA-163 plus NDM (2.1%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the main species recovered, representing 76% of the isolates. According to the carbapenemase classes or combinations, tigecycline exhibited a susceptibility range of 33-83%, fosfomycin 59-81%, colistin 27-78%, and amikacin 17-81%. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and imipenem-relebactam (IMR) showed 92% and 98% susceptibility against serine carbapenemases, respectively. Meanwhile, aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) exhibited 96-98% susceptibility against all carbapenemase classes.

CONCLUSIONS

A new epidemiological landscape has emerged, characterized by the equivalent circulation of NDM and KPC. K. pneumoniae remains the primary species responsible for their dissemination. The co-production of carbapenemase combinations, particularly KPC plus NDM, was confirmed, mainly in K. pneumoniae. High activity was observed for AZA against MBLs and for CZA and IMR against KPC and OXA-163 carbapenemases.

Navigating the Current Treatment Landscape of Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Infections: What are the Limitations?

The spread of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative pathogens, especially those producing metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), has become a major health concern. MBLs are molecularly the most diverse carbapenemases, produced by a wide spectrum of gram-negative organisms, including the Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas spp., Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and can hydrolyze most β-lactams using metal ion cofactors in their active sites. Over the years, the prevalence of MBL-carrying isolates has increased globally, particularly in Asia. MBL infections are associated with adverse clinical outcomes including longer length of hospital stay, ICU admission, and increased mortality across the globe. The optimal treatment for MBL infections not only depends on the pathogen but also on the underlying resistance mechanisms. Currently, there are only few drugs or drug combinations that can efficiently offset MBL-mediated resistance, which makes the treatment of MBL infections challenging. The rising concern of MBLs along with the limited treatment options has led to the need and development of drugs that are specifically targeted towards MBLs. This review discusses the prevalence of MBLs, their clinical impact, and the current treatment options for MBL infections and their limitations. Furthermore, this review will discuss agents currently in the pipeline for treatment of MBL infections.

Sulbactam-durlobactam for the treatment of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex

INTRODUCTION

Infections with Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) pose difficulty for clinicians given a limited arsenal of effective antimicrobials. Sulbactam/durlobactam provides a novel treatment option for patients experiencing hospital- or ventilator-acquired pneumonia with susceptible strains.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides a comprehensive discussion of sulbactam/durlobactam, including basic characteristics, in vitro activity, and clinical trial data supporting its use for the treatment of ABC. Manufacturer's data, published literature to date, and conference data are utilized in this review.

EXPERT OPINION

Sulbactam/durlobactam offers clinicians a new and effective treatment option for resistant ABC infection. Sulbactam, when combined with durlobactam, displays enhanced potency against ABC isolates, which has translated into positive clinical outcomes observed in clinical trials and post-marketing case studies. Although overall treatment indications and clinical experience are limited to date, sulbactam/durlobactam offers a familiar and favorable safety profile in comparison with alternative agents. Factors associated with use of combination antibiotic therapy, availability of commercial drug susceptibility testing, and cost-effectiveness are all currently key considerations for sulbactam/durlobactam use.

Successful therapy of a newborn with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia nosocomial pneumonia with cefiderocol

Cefiderocol is a new siderophore-beta-lactam antibiotic used for the treatment of severe multidrug-resistant infections like sepsis, hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia in adults, but there are only single reports on its use in the neonatal population. We describe the successful cefiderocol treatment of a newborn with pneumogenic sepsis due to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.

Evaluation of the quickmic system in the rapid diagnosis of Gram-negative bacilli bacteremia

Rapid microbiological diagnosis of the antibiotic susceptibility of Gram-negative bacilli is a priority in clinical microbiology, especially in cases of bacteremia. The rapid advancement of antimicrobial resistance proposes a challenge for empirical antibiotic therapy and shows the need for fast antibiotic susceptibility diagnostics to guide treatments. The QuickMIC System (Gradientech AB, Uppsala, Sweden) is a recently developed rapid diagnostic tool for antibiotic susceptibility testing. Our study evaluates a rapid phenotypic system (QuickMIC) that provides information on the susceptibility of 12 antibiotics against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus spp., Citrobacter spp., and Serratia marcescens. A total of 816 antibiotic/microorganism combinations were tested, resulting in eight discrepancies. The concordance between the antibiotics offered by QuickMIC and reference methods (MicroScan WalkAway plus system, Beckman Coulter; Etest (BioMerieux microdilution system (Bruker); Real-time PCR (GeneXpert, Cepheid); and immunochromatography (Biotech) was 99.02%. Time elapsed to obtain a valid minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) was between 2 and 4 h. The QuickMIC system allows for the early adjustment of antibiotic treatment in these infections. Given the existing limitations of currently available rapid methods, its clinical utility is particularly relevant in the management of P. aeruginosa infections and AmpC-producing Enterobacterales. The use of rapid methods can help diversify antibiotic use and reduce carbapenem consumption.

IMPORTANCE

The rapid diagnosis of antibiotic sensitivity in Gram-negative bacilli is of paramount importance in clinical microbiology, particularly in cases of bacteremia. The escalating challenge of antimicrobial resistance underscores the need for expeditious antibiotic susceptibility diagnostics to guide empirical antibiotic therapy effectively. In light of this, we present our study that evaluates the QuickMIC System, a recently developed rapid diagnostic antibiogram. QuickMIC System, offers a novel approach to phenotypic testing, providing information on the activity of 12 antibiotics against key pathogens, including Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus spp., Citrobacter spp., and Serratia marcescens. Our investigation involved testing a total of 816 antibiotic/microorganism combinations. The study demonstrated an impressive 99.02% concordance between the QuickMIC System and the reference methods, with only eight discrepancies observed. The time to actionable minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ranged between 2 and 4 h, highlighting the system's efficiency in providing rapid results.

RESIST ACINETO test for the rapid detection of NDM and OXA acquired carbapenemases directly from blood culture in Acinetobacter species

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) are increasingly reported worldwide and a leading cause of mortality associated with antimicrobial resistance. Their early detection, particularly in the cases of bloodstream infections, is crucial in attempting to initiate effective antibiotic treatment. The immunochromatographic assay RESIST ACINETO (Coris BioConcept) is a new test developed for the detection of OXA-23, OXA-40/58, and New-Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) carbapenemases in Acinetobacter spp. We evaluated this test on a collection of 121 Acinetobacter spp. clinical isolates, including 104 carbapenemase producers (97 carbapenemases targeted by the test) and 17 non-carbapenemase producers. The performance of the RESIST ACINETO test was evaluated according to the manufacturer's recommendations from bacterial and blood cultures. The strains producing the carbapenemases OXA-23, -40, -58, or/and NDM were accurately detected from bacterial cultures and directly from blood cultures, with the exception of one OXA-23/NDM-1-positive Acinetobacter radioresistens isolate (only detected through standard culture). None of the non-carbapenemase producers tested positive. The RESIST ACINETO test demonstrated sensitivity/specificity of 100%/100% and 99%/100% on bacterial and blood cultures, respectively.

IMPORTANCE

The incidence of bloodstream infections with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) could be very high in some countries such as the Balkans or Southeast Asia. In case of positive blood cultures with Gram-negative bacteria, the use of the RESIST ACINETO test could prove highly beneficial for the rapid identification of these imipenem-resistant bacteria and their antibiotic resistance mechanisms. In addition, it is now well established that New-Delhi Metallo-beta-lactamase (NDM) carbapenemase-producing isolates can have increased MICs of cefiderocol, which is an alternative treatment for these infections. This test may also allow the optimization of treatment based on the type of carbapenemase present. Finally, the RESIST ACINETO test is a rapid, easy-to-use, and cost-effective assay that demonstrates excellent performance in detecting the major acquired carbapenemases present in the Acinetobacter species.

Real-world performance of susceptibility testing for cefiderocol: insights from a prospective multicentre study on Gram-negative bacteria

Objectives

Cefiderocol is a novel siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin developed for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) infections. However, the current gold standard for cefiderocol susceptibility testing, broth microdilution (BMD) using iron-depleted cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth, presents challenges for many microbiology laboratories. In this study, we evaluate the real-world performance of disc diffusion (DD) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP®) to test cefiderocol susceptibility in a series of isolates collected prospectively from severely ill patients in a multicentre study.

Methods

The susceptibilities of 1472 isolates (632 Enterobacterales, 532 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 84 Acinetobacter spp. and 224 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia) collected in 60 Spanish hospitals were analysed following the EUCAST 2023 and 2024 criteria. We assessed the performance of DD (cefiderocol 30 μg disc, Liofilchem) and a commercial BMD method (ComASP® Cefiderocol, Liofilchem).

Results

A total of 1408 and 1450 isolates were susceptible by DD and ComASP® BMD, respectively. Overall, the agreement between both methods was 96.9%. Forty-four isolates were resistant by DD but susceptible by ComASP® BMD, and two were susceptible by DD but resistant by ComASP® BMD (Acinetobacter baumannii isolates). Adoption of the updated 2024 EUCAST DD breakpoints and areas of technical uncertainty (ATUs) led to a decrease in susceptibility among Enterobacterales (95.3% versus 92.6%).

Conclusions

DD is a straightforward, rapid and accessible method for routine determination of cefiderocol susceptibility in real-world practice. ComASP® BMD shows a high agreement with DD in susceptible isolates and may help to resolve DD interpretability concerns in isolates with susceptibility results within the ATU, but caution is warranted when testing resistant isolates.

Use of Cefiderocol in Adult Patients: Descriptive Analysis from a Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Cefiderocol is a siderophore cephalosporin showing activity against various carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). No data currently exist about real-world use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy (e.g., empirical or targeted, monotherapy or combined regimens), indications, and patient characteristics.

METHODS

In this multicenter, prospective study, we aimed at describing the use of cefiderocol in terms of types of therapy, indications, and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Cefiderocol was administered as empirical and targeted therapy in 27.5% (55/200) and 72.5% (145/200) of cases, respectively. Overall, it was administered as monotherapy in 101/200 cases (50.5%) and as part of a combined regimen for CR-GNB infections in the remaining 99/200 cases (49.5%). In multivariable analysis, previous isolation of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii odds ratio (OR) 2.56, with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-6.46, p = 0.047] and previous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (OR 8.73, 95% CI 1.05-72.54, p = 0.045) were associated with administration of cefiderocol as part of a combined regimen, whereas chronic kidney disease was associated with cefiderocol monotherapy (OR 0.38 for combined regimen, 95% CI 0.16-0.91, p = 0.029). Cumulative 30-day mortality was 19.8%, 45.0%, 20.7%, and 22.7% in patients receiving targeted cefiderocol for infections by Enterobacterales, A. baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and any metallo-β-lactamase producers, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol is mainly used for targeted treatment, although empirical therapies account for more than 25% of prescriptions, thus requiring dedicated standardization and guidance. The almost equal distribution of cefiderocol monotherapy and cefiderocol-based combination therapies underlines the need for further study to ascertain possible differences in efficacy between the two approaches.

Genomic Insights into Vietnamese Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamase-9-Producing Extensively Drug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates Belonging to the High-Risk Clone ST357 Obtained from Bulgarian Intensive Care Unit Patients

Extensively drug-resistant P. aeruginosa (XDR-PA) has been highlighted as a serious public health threat. The present study aimed to explore the genomic characteristics of two Vietnamese extended-spectrum β-lactamase-9 (VEB-9)-producing XDR-PA isolates from Bulgaria in comparison to all blaVEB-9-positive strains with available genomes. The isolates designated Pae51 and Pae52 were obtained from tracheobronchial aspirates of intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, whole-genome sequencing, RT-qPCR, and phylogenomic analysis were performed. Pae51 and Pae52 were resistant to most antipseudomonal β-lactams including carbapenems, aminoglycosides, and fluoroquinolones but remained susceptible to colistin and cefiderocol. Numerous resistance determinants were detected: blaVEB-9, blaPDC-3, blaOXA-10, blaOXA-50, aac(6')-II, ant(2″)-Ia, ant(3″)-IIa, aph(3')-IIb, cprP, catB7, dfrB2, sul1, fosA, and tet(A). Both isolates carried complex integrons with blaVEB-9 and tet(A) embedded next to the conservative 3' end sequences. A variety of virulence factors were also identified, including the type III secretion system exotoxin U. Pae51 and Pae52 differed by only four SNPs and belonged to the high-risk clone ST357. To our knowledge, this is the first report of blaVEB-9-positive XDR-PA isolates in Bulgaria presenting a detailed genomic analysis. The development of novel antimicrobial strategies for such pathogens should be an essential part of infection control stewardship practices in ICU wards.

Challenges Facing Two Outbreaks of Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: From Cefiderocol Susceptibility Testing to the Emergence of Cefiderocol-Resistant Mutants

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections are associated with poor outcomes depending on patient's conditions, clinical severity and type of infection, and treatment is challenging given the limited therapeutic options available. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics of two outbreaks caused by CRAB in an intensive care unit (ICU). In addition, the mechanisms of resistance detected in these strains and the treatment chosen according to the available therapeutic options were analyzed. Overall, 28 patients were included. Ten patients (35.71%) had ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), ten (35.71%) had a bloodstream infection (BSI), and eight (28.57%) were only colonized. Recurrent infection occurred in 25% (5/20) of infected patients. Two different strains of A. baumannii were isolated from the index patient of the first outbreak. The first strain belonged to the ST85 and carried the blaNDM-1 carbapenemase gene, while the second belonged to the ST2 and carried blaOXA-23, and blaOXA-66 carbapenemase genes. The phylogenetic analysis revealed that the ST2 strain was the cause of the major outbreak, and mutations in the AmpC gene were related to progressive increasing minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and finally, cefiderocol-resistance in one strain. The CRAB isolates from the second outbreak were also identified as ST2. Cefiderocol-resistant strains tests identified by the disc diffusion method were involved in 24% (6/25) of nosocomial infections. Using broth microdilution (BMD) ComASP® only, 33.3% (2/6) of these strains were cefiderocol-resistant. All-cause ICU mortality was 21.4%. Conclusions: Cefiderocol is the first approved siderophore cephalosporin for the treatment of CRAB infections. Cefiderocol-resistant strains were related with blaNDM-1 carbapenemase and mutations in the AmpC gene. Cefiderocol-resistant strains or that cannot be properly interpreted by disk diffusion, should be retested using BMD for definitive categorization.

Comparison of available methods to evaluate cefiderocol susceptibility in Acinetobacter spp

Recently, considerable uncertainty has arisen concerning the appropriate susceptibility testing for cefiderocol in gram-negative bacilli, particularly in the context of its application to Acinetobacter spp. The optimal method for assessing the susceptibility levels of Acinetobacter spp. to cefiderocol remains a subject of debate due to substantial disparities observed in the values obtained through various testing procedures. This study employed four minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) methodologies and the disk diffusion to assess the susceptibility of twenty-seven carbapenem resistant (CR)-Acinetobacter strains to cefiderocol. The results from our study reveal significant variations in the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values obtained with the different methods and in the level of agreement in interpretation categories between the different MIC methods and the disk diffusion test. Among the MIC methods, there was relatively more consistency in reporting the interpretation categories. For European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints, the categorical agreement (CA) for MIC methods ranged between 66.7 and 81.5%. On the other hand, the essential agreement (EA) values were as low as 18.5-29.6%. The CA between MIC methods and disk diffusion was 81.5%. These results emphasize the need for a reliable, accurate, and clinically validated methodology to effectively assess the susceptibility of Acinetobacter spp. to cefiderocol. The wide variability observed in our study highlights the importance of standardizing the susceptibility testing process for cefiderocol to ensure consistent and reliable results for clinical decision-making.

Comparison of Different Methods for Assaying the In Vitro Activity of Cefiderocol against Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains: Influence of Bacterial Inoculum

Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections represent a critical public health concern, highlighting the need for the development of effective antibiotics. Cefiderocol demonstrated potent in vitro activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, particularly in strains that are resistant to other drugs. However, concerns regarding the emergence of drug-resistant strains persist. This study, conducted with 109 carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains from the Spanish Hospital (Dr. Balmis, Alicante). The study evaluated susceptibility to cefiderocol in comparison to alternative antibiotics and including their susceptibility to bacterial inoculum, while assessing various testing methods. Our findings revealed high susceptibility to cefiderocol against carbapenem-resistant strains, with only 2 of 109 strains exhibiting resistance. Comparative analysis demonstrated superiority of cefiderocol towards alternative antibiotics. Both the E-test and disk-diffusion methods showed 100% concordance with the microdilution method in classifying strains as susceptible or resistant. However, 4.6% (5/109) of disc zone diameters fell within the technical uncertainty zone, so the E-test technique was found to be more useful in routine clinical practice. Additionally, escalating bacterial inoculum correlated with decreases in vitro activity, so this parameter should be adjusted very carefully in in vivo studies. This study underscores cefiderocol's potential as a therapeutic option for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. However, the emergence of drug-resistant strains emphasizes the critical need for a wise use of antibiotics and a continuous monitoring of resistance to antibiotics. Based on our in vitro data, further investigation concerning the impact of bacterial inoculum on drug efficacy is warranted in order to detect resistance mechanisms and optimize treatment strategies, thereby mitigating the risk of resistance.

Cefiderocol susceptibility of Achromobacter spp.: study of an accurately identified collection of 230 strains

BACKGROUND

Achromobacter spp. are opportunistic pathogens, mostly infecting immunocompromised patients and patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) and considered as difficult-to-treat pathogens due to both intrinsic resistance and the possibility of acquired antimicrobial resistance. Species identification remains challenging leading to imprecise descriptions of resistance in each taxon. Cefiderocol is a broad-spectrum siderophore cephalosporin increasingly used in the management of Achromobacter infections for which susceptibility data remain scarce. We aimed to describe the susceptibility to cefiderocol of a collection of Achromobacter strains encompassing different species and isolation sources from CF or non-CF (NCF) patients.

METHODS

We studied 230 Achromobacter strains (67 from CF, 163 from NCF patients) identified by nrdA gene-based analysis, with available susceptibility data for piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of cefiderocol were determined using the broth microdilution reference method according to EUCAST guidelines.

RESULTS

Strains belonged to 15 species. A. xylosoxidans represented the main species (71.3%). MICs ranged from ≤ 0.015 to 16 mg/L with MIC50/90 of ≤ 0.015/0.5 mg/L overall and 0.125/2 mg/L against 27 (11.7%) meropenem-non-susceptible strains. Cefiderocol MICs were not related to CF/NCF origin or species although A. xylosoxidans MICs were statistically lower than those of other species considered as a whole. Considering the EUCAST non-species related breakpoint (2 mg/L), 228 strains (99.1%) were susceptible to cefiderocol. The two cefiderocol-resistant strains (A. xylosoxidans from CF patients) represented 3.7% of meropenem-non-susceptible strains and 12.5% of MDR strains.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefiderocol exhibited excellent in vitro activity against a large collection of accurately identified Achromobacter strains, irrespective of species and origin.

Treatment Strategies of Colistin Resistance Acinetobacter baumannii Infections

Acinetobacter baumannii has emerged as a pressing challenge in clinical practice, mainly due to the development of resistance to multiple antibiotics, including colistin, one of the last-resort treatments. This review highlights all the possible mechanisms of colistin resistance and the genetic basis contributing to this resistance, such as modifications to lipopolysaccharide or lipid A structures, alterations in outer membrane permeability via porins and heteroresistance. In light of this escalating threat, the review also evaluates available treatment options. The development of new antibiotics (cefiderocol, sulbactam/durlobactam) although not available everywhere, and the use of various combinations and synergistic drug combinations (including two or more of the following: a polymyxin, ampicillin/sulbactam, carbapenems, fosfomycin, tigecycline/minocycline, a rifamycin, and aminoglycosides) are discussed in the context of overcoming colistin resistance of A. baumannii infections. Although most studied combinations are polymyxin-based combinations, non-polymyxin-based combinations have been emerging as promising options. However, clinical data remain limited and continued investigation is essential to determine optimal therapeutic strategies against colistin-resistant A. baumannii.

Performance evaluation of Bruker UMIC® microdilution panel and disc diffusion to determine cefiderocol susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Burkolderia species

PURPOSE

Cefiderocol susceptibility testing (AST) represents an open challenge for clinical microbiology. Herein, we evaluated the performance of the UMIC® Cefiderocol broth microdilution (BMD) test and disc diffusion on Gram-negative species.

METHODS

UMIC® Cefiderocol BMD test, disc diffusion and reference BMD were in parallel performed on a collection of 256 clinical isolates. Categorical agreement (CA), essential agreement (EA), bias, major errors (MEs) and very major errors (VMEs) were calculated for both AST methods.

RESULTS

The UMIC® Cefiderocol BMD strip exhibited an EA < 90% (85.5%), a CA higher than 90% (93.7%) and a low number of VMEs (n = 4, 4.2%) and MEs (n = 12, 7.4%). UMIC® Cefiderocol identified 96.2% of the resistant isolates [Enterobacterales, (39/40); P. aeruginosa (19/19); A. xylosoxidans (5/6); S. maltophilia (5/6); Burkholderia spp. (8/8)]. Disc diffusion showed a high CA (from 94.9 to 100%) regardless of disc manufacturer in Enterobacterales, P. aeuroginosa, A. baumannii and S. maltophilia. However, high rates of results falling in the area of technical uncertainty (ATU) were observed in Enterobacterales (34/90, 37.8%) and P. aeruginosa (16/40, 40%). Disc diffusion showed a poor performance in A. xylosoxidans and Burkholderia spp. if PK/PD breakpoint was used (overall, 5/9 VMEs; in contrast, the use of P. aeruginosa-specific breakpoints resulted in 100% of CA with 24.6% of results in the ATU).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, disc diffusion and UMIC® Cefiderocol are valid methods for the determination of cefiderocol susceptibility. Given the high number of results in the ATU by disc diffusion, a combined use of both AST methods may represent a solution to overcome the challenge of cefiderocol susceptibility testing in routine microbiology laboratories.

Current developments and prospects of the antibiotic delivery systems

Antibiotics have remained the cornerstone for the treatment of bacterial infections ever since their discovery in the twentieth century. The uproar over antibiotic resistance among bacteria arising from genome plasticity and biofilm development has rendered current antibiotic therapies ineffective, urging the development of innovative therapeutic approaches. The development of antibiotic resistance among bacteria has further heightened the clinical failure of antibiotic therapy, which is often linked to its low bioavailability, side effects, and poor penetration and accumulation at the site of infection. In this review, we highlight the potential use of siderophores, antibodies, cell-penetrating peptides, antimicrobial peptides, bacteriophages, and nanoparticles to smuggle antibiotics across impermeable biological membranes to achieve therapeutically relevant concentrations of antibiotics and combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR). We will discuss the general mechanisms via which each delivery system functions and how it can be tailored to deliver antibiotics against the paradigm of mechanisms underlying antibiotic resistance.

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: the role of plasmids in emergence, dissemination, and evolution of a major clinical challenge

INTRODUCTION

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a major agent of healthcare-associated infections and a cause of some community-acquired infections, including severe bacteremic infections associated with metastatic abscesses in liver and other organs. Clinical relevance is compounded by its outstanding propensity to evolve antibiotic resistance. In particular, the emergence and dissemination of carbapenem resistance in K. pneumoniae has posed a major challenge due to the few residual treatment options, which have only recently been expanded by some new agents. The epidemiological success of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CR-Kp) is mainly linked with clonal lineages that produce carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes (carbapenemases) encoded by plasmids.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we provide an updated overview on the mechanisms underlying the emergence and dissemination of CR-Kp, focusing on the role that plasmids have played in this phenomenon and in the co-evolution of resistance and virulence in K. pneumoniae.

EXPERT OPINION

CR-Kp have disseminated on a global scale, representing one of the most important contemporary public health issues. These strains are almost invariably associated with complex multi-drug resistance (MDR) phenotypes, which can also include recently approved antibiotics. The heterogeneity of the molecular bases responsible for these phenotypes poses significant hurdles for therapeutic and diagnostic purposes.

Bacterial Pathogenesis and Antimicrobial Strategy

Antimicrobial resistance and multidrug resistance are major global health concerns [...].

Approaches to Testing Novel β-Lactam and β-Lactam Combination Agents in the Clinical Laboratory

The rapid emergence of multi-drug resistant Gram-negative pathogens has driven the introduction of novel β-lactam combination agents (BLCs) to the antibiotic market: ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and sulbactam-durlobactam. These agents are equipped with innovative mechanisms that confer broad Gram-negative activity, notably against certain challenging carbapenemases. While their introduction offers a beacon of hope, clinical microbiology laboratories must navigate the complexities of susceptibility testing for these agents due to their diverse activity profiles against specific β-lactamases and the possibility of acquired resistance mechanisms in some bacterial isolates. This review explores the complexities of these novel antimicrobial agents detailing the intricacies of their application, providing guidance on the nuances of susceptibility testing, interpretation, and result reporting in clinical microbiology laboratories.