Generation of post-meal insulin correction boluses in type 1 diabetes simulation models for in-silico clinical trials: More realistic scenarios obtained using a decision tree approach

Advanced decision support system for individuals with diabetes on multiple daily injections therapy using reinforcement learning and nearest-neighbors: In-silico and clinical results

Many individuals with diabetes on multiple daily insulin injections therapy use carbohydrate ratios (CRs) and correction factors (CFs) to determine mealtime and correction insulin boluses. The CRs and CFs vary over time due to physiological changes in individuals' response to insulin. Errors in insulin dosing can lead to life-threatening abnormal glucose levels, increasing the risk of retinopathy, neuropathy, and nephropathy. Here, we present a novel learning algorithm that uses Q-learning to track optimal CRs and uses nearest-neighbors based Q-learning to track optimal CFs. The learning algorithm was compared with the run-to-run algorithm A and the run-to-run algorithm B, both proposed in the literature, over an 8-week period using a validated simulator with a realistic scenario created with suboptimal CRs and CFs values, carbohydrate counting errors, and random meals sizes at random ingestion times. From Week 1 to Week 8, the learning algorithm increased the percentage of time spent in target glucose range (4.0 to 10.0 mmol/L) from 51 % to 64 % compared to 61 % and 58 % with the run-to-run algorithm A and the run-to-run algorithm B, respectively. The learning algorithm decreased the percentage of time spent below 4.0 mmol/L from 9 % to 1.9 % compared to 3.4 % and 2.3 % with the run-to-run algorithm A and the run-to-run algorithm B, respectively. The algorithm was also assessed by comparing its recommendations with (i) the endocrinologist's recommendations on two type 1 diabetes individuals over a 16-week period and (ii) real-world individuals' therapy settings changes of 23 individuals (19 type 2 and 4 type 1) over an 8-week period using the commercial Bigfoot Unity Diabetes Management System. The full agreements (i) were 89 % and 76 % for CRs and CFs for the type 1 diabetes individuals and (ii) was 62 % for mealtime doses for the individuals on the commercial Bigfoot system. Therefore, the proposed algorithm has the potential to improve glucose control in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Risk of hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes management: An in-silico sensitivity analysis to assess and rank the quantitative impact of different behavioral factors

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In type 1 diabetes (T1D), a quantitative evaluation of the impact on hypoglycemia of suboptimal therapeutic decision (e.g. incorrect estimation of the ingested carbohydrates, inaccurate insulin timing, etc) is unavailable. Clinical trials to measure sensitivity to patient actions would be expensive, exposed to confounding factors and risky for the participants. In this work, a T1D patient decision simulator (T1D-PDS), realistically reproducing blood glucose dynamics in a large virtual population, is used to perform extensive in-silico trials and the so-derived data employed to implement a sensitivity analysis that ranks different behavioral factors based on their impact on a clinically meaningful parameter, the time below range (TBR).

METHODS

Eleven behavioral factors impacting on hypoglycemia are considered. The T1D-PDS was used to perform multiple 2-week simulations involving 100 adults, by testing about 3500 different perturbations for nominal behavior. A local linear approximation of the function linking the TBR and the factors were computed to derive sensitivity indices (SIs), quantifying the impact of each factor on TBR variations.

RESULTS

The obtained ranking quantifies importance of factors w.r.t. the others. Factors apparently related to hypoglycemia were correctly placed on the top of the ranking, including systematic (SI=2.05%) and random (SI=1.35%) carb-counting error, hypotreatment dose (SI=-1.21%), insulin bolus time w.r.t. mealtime (SI=1.09%).

CONCLUSIONS

The obtained SIs allowed to rank behavioral factors based on their impact on TBR. The behavioral factors identified as most influential can be prioritized in patient training.