1
|
Baltoumas FA, Karatzas E, Paez-Espino D, Venetsianou NK, Aplakidou E, Oulas A, Finn RD, Ovchinnikov S, Pafilis E, Kyrpides NC, Pavlopoulos GA. Exploring microbial functional biodiversity at the protein family level-From metagenomic sequence reads to annotated protein clusters. FRONTIERS IN BIOINFORMATICS 2023; 3:1157956. [PMID: 36959975 PMCID: PMC10029925 DOI: 10.3389/fbinf.2023.1157956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Metagenomics has enabled accessing the genetic repertoire of natural microbial communities. Metagenome shotgun sequencing has become the method of choice for studying and classifying microorganisms from various environments. To this end, several methods have been developed to process and analyze the sequence data from raw reads to end-products such as predicted protein sequences or families. In this article, we provide a thorough review to simplify such processes and discuss the alternative methodologies that can be followed in order to explore biodiversity at the protein family level. We provide details for analysis tools and we comment on their scalability as well as their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we report the available data repositories and recommend various approaches for protein family annotation related to phylogenetic distribution, structure prediction and metadata enrichment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fotis A. Baltoumas
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, BSRC “Alexander Fleming”, Vari, Greece
| | - Evangelos Karatzas
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, BSRC “Alexander Fleming”, Vari, Greece
| | - David Paez-Espino
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | - Nefeli K. Venetsianou
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, BSRC “Alexander Fleming”, Vari, Greece
| | - Eleni Aplakidou
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, BSRC “Alexander Fleming”, Vari, Greece
| | - Anastasis Oulas
- The Cyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Robert D. Finn
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sergey Ovchinnikov
- John Harvard Distinguished Science Fellowship Program, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States
| | - Evangelos Pafilis
- Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture (IMBBC), Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (HCMR), Heraklion, Greece
| | - Nikos C. Kyrpides
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, DOE Joint Genome Institute, Berkeley, CA, United States
| | - Georgios A. Pavlopoulos
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, BSRC “Alexander Fleming”, Vari, Greece
- Center of New Biotechnologies and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
- Hellenic Army Academy, Vari, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Network modeling transforms data into a structure of nodes and edges such that edges represent relationships between pairs of objects, then extracts clusters of densely connected nodes in order to capture high-dimensional relationships hidden in the data. This efficient and flexible strategy holds potential for unveiling complex patterns concealed within massive datasets, but standard implementations overlook several key issues that can undermine research efforts. These issues range from data imputation and discretization to correlation metrics, clustering methods, and validation of results. Here, we enumerate these pitfalls and provide practical strategies for alleviating their negative effects. These guidelines increase prospects for future research endeavors as they reduce type I and type II (false-positive and false-negative) errors and are generally applicable for network modeling applications across diverse domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharlee Climer
- Department of Computer Science, University of Missouri – St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baltoumas FA, Zafeiropoulou S, Karatzas E, Koutrouli M, Thanati F, Voutsadaki K, Gkonta M, Hotova J, Kasionis I, Hatzis P, Pavlopoulos GA. Biomolecule and Bioentity Interaction Databases in Systems Biology: A Comprehensive Review. Biomolecules 2021; 11:1245. [PMID: 34439912 PMCID: PMC8391349 DOI: 10.3390/biom11081245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Technological advances in high-throughput techniques have resulted in tremendous growth of complex biological datasets providing evidence regarding various biomolecular interactions. To cope with this data flood, computational approaches, web services, and databases have been implemented to deal with issues such as data integration, visualization, exploration, organization, scalability, and complexity. Nevertheless, as the number of such sets increases, it is becoming more and more difficult for an end user to know what the scope and focus of each repository is and how redundant the information between them is. Several repositories have a more general scope, while others focus on specialized aspects, such as specific organisms or biological systems. Unfortunately, many of these databases are self-contained or poorly documented and maintained. For a clearer view, in this article we provide a comprehensive categorization, comparison and evaluation of such repositories for different bioentity interaction types. We discuss most of the publicly available services based on their content, sources of information, data representation methods, user-friendliness, scope and interconnectivity, and we comment on their strengths and weaknesses. We aim for this review to reach a broad readership varying from biomedical beginners to experts and serve as a reference article in the field of Network Biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fotis A. Baltoumas
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
| | - Sofia Zafeiropoulou
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
| | - Evangelos Karatzas
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
| | - Mikaela Koutrouli
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
- Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Foteini Thanati
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
| | - Kleanthi Voutsadaki
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
| | - Maria Gkonta
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
| | - Joana Hotova
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
| | - Ioannis Kasionis
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
| | - Pantelis Hatzis
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
- Center for New Biotechnologies and Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Georgios A. Pavlopoulos
- Institute for Fundamental Biomedical Research, Biomedical Sciences Research Center “Alexander Fleming”, 16672 Vari, Greece; (S.Z.); (E.K.); (M.K.); (F.T.); (K.V.); (M.G.); (J.H.); (I.K.); (P.H.)
- Center for New Biotechnologies and Precision Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|