1
|
Shyr C, Grout RW, Kennedy N, Akdas Y, Tischbein M, Milford J, Tan J, Quarles K, Edwards TL, Novak LL, White J, Wilkins CH, Harris PA. Leveraging artificial intelligence to summarize abstracts in lay language for increasing research accessibility and transparency. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31:2294-2303. [PMID: 39008829 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Revised: 06/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Returning aggregate study results is an important ethical responsibility to promote trust and inform decision making, but the practice of providing results to a lay audience is not widely adopted. Barriers include significant cost and time required to develop lay summaries and scarce infrastructure necessary for returning them to the public. Our study aims to generate, evaluate, and implement ChatGPT 4 lay summaries of scientific abstracts on a national clinical study recruitment platform, ResearchMatch, to facilitate timely and cost-effective return of study results at scale. MATERIALS AND METHODS We engineered prompts to summarize abstracts at a literacy level accessible to the public, prioritizing succinctness, clarity, and practical relevance. Researchers and volunteers assessed ChatGPT-generated lay summaries across five dimensions: accuracy, relevance, accessibility, transparency, and harmfulness. We used precision analysis and adaptive random sampling to determine the optimal number of summaries for evaluation, ensuring high statistical precision. RESULTS ChatGPT achieved 95.9% (95% CI, 92.1-97.9) accuracy and 96.2% (92.4-98.1) relevance across 192 summary sentences from 33 abstracts based on researcher review. 85.3% (69.9-93.6) of 34 volunteers perceived ChatGPT-generated summaries as more accessible and 73.5% (56.9-85.4) more transparent than the original abstract. None of the summaries were deemed harmful. We expanded ResearchMatch's technical infrastructure to automatically generate and display lay summaries for over 750 published studies that resulted from the platform's recruitment mechanism. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Implementing AI-generated lay summaries on ResearchMatch demonstrates the potential of a scalable framework generalizable to broader platforms for enhancing research accessibility and transparency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathy Shyr
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
| | - Randall W Grout
- Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
- Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States
| | - Nan Kennedy
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
| | - Yasemin Akdas
- Division of Emergency Medicine Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States
| | - Maeve Tischbein
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
| | - Joshua Milford
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
| | - Jason Tan
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
| | - Kaysi Quarles
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
| | - Terri L Edwards
- Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
| | - Laurie L Novak
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
| | - Jules White
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, United States
| | - Consuelo H Wilkins
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, United States
| | - Paul A Harris
- Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
- Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37203, United States
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen Y, Cappucci SP, Kim JA. Prognostic Implications of Early Prediction in Posttraumatic Epilepsy. Semin Neurol 2024; 44:333-341. [PMID: 38621706 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1785502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
Posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) is a complication of traumatic brain injury that can increase morbidity, but predicting which patients may develop PTE remains a challenge. Much work has been done to identify a variety of risk factors and biomarkers, or a combination thereof, for patients at highest risk of PTE. However, several issues have hampered progress toward fully adapted PTE models. Such issues include the need for models that are well-validated, cost-effective, and account for competing outcomes like death. Additionally, while an accurate PTE prediction model can provide quantitative prognostic information, how such information is communicated to inform shared decision-making and treatment strategies requires consideration of an individual patient's clinical trajectory and unique values, especially given the current absence of direct anti-epileptogenic treatments. Future work exploring approaches integrating individualized communication of prediction model results are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yilun Chen
- Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | - Jennifer A Kim
- Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sgro GM, Maurer M, Nguyen B, Siegel JE. Return of aggregate results to study participants: Facilitators, barriers, and recommendations. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2023; 33:101136. [PMID: 37180845 PMCID: PMC10172747 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Most researchers and study participants believe that the summary, or aggregate, results of health research should be returned to study participants. However, researchers often do not return aggregate results. A better understanding of the impediments to results return could support improvements in this practice. Methods This qualitative study convened eight virtual focus groups, four with investigators and four with patient partners from research studies funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). In total, 23 investigators and 20 partners participated. We explored perspectives, experiences, influences, and recommendations related to aggregate results return. Results Focus group participants described the ethical importance of returning aggregate results, as well as the benefits to study participants. They also noted important impediments to results return, emphasizing IRB and logistical challenges and describing a lack of support for the practice both on the part of institutions and the field at large. Participants highlighted the value of patients and caregivers' perspectives and contributions to results return, which focused on returning the most relevant findings through effective channels and formats. They further emphasized the importance of planning and identified resources that could support results return. Conclusion Researchers, funders, and the field can better facilitate results return by promoting standardized processes in research, such as the earmarking of funds for results return and inclusion of results returns milestones in research plans. More intentional policies, infrastructures, and resources that support results return may lead to more widespread return of study results to those who make these studies possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina M. Sgro
- American Institutes for Research, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Corresponding author.
| | | | - Beth Nguyen
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington D.C., USA
| | - Joanna E. Siegel
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington D.C., USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
McElfish PA, Liston R, Smith V, Norris AK, Weaver J, Dickson SM, Macechko MD, Brimberry RK, Lemdja MR, Middleton TL, Nix MW, Irish-Clardy KA, Meredith-Neve SM, Kennedy JL, James LP. Rural Research Network to engage rural and minority community members in translational research. J Clin Transl Res 2023; 9:115-122. [PMID: 37179792 PMCID: PMC10171320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To address the high prevalence of health disparities and lack of research opportunities among rural and minority communities, the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) developed the Rural Research Network in January 2020. Aim The aim of this report is to describe our process and progress in developing a rural research network. The Rural Research Network provides a platform to expand research participation opportunities to rural Arkansans, many of whom are older adults, low-income individuals, and underrepresented minority populations. Methods The Rural Research Network leverages existing UAMS Regional Programs family medicine residency clinics within an academic medical center. Results Since the inception of the Rural Research Network, research infrastructure and processes have been built within the regional sites. Twelve diverse studies have been implemented with recruitment and data collection from 9248 participants, and 32 manuscripts have been published with residents and faculty from the regional sites. Most studies were able to recruit Black/African American participants at or above a representative sample. Conclusions As the Rural Research Network matures, the types of research will expand in parallel with the health priorities of Arkansas. Relevance to Patients The Rural Research Network demonstrates how Cancer Institutes and sites funded by a Clinical and Translational Science Award can collaborate to expand research capacity and increase opportunities for research among rural and minority communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pearl A. McElfish
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Springdale, AR, United States of America
| | - Robin Liston
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States of America
| | - Veronica Smith
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States of America
| | - Amber K. Norris
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences East, Helena-West Helena, AR, United States of America
| | - Jordan Weaver
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences North Central, Batesville, AR, United States of America
| | - Scott M. Dickson
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northeast, Jonesboro, AR, United States of America
| | - Michael D. Macechko
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America
| | - Ronald K. Brimberry
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, Fayetteville, AR, United States of America
| | - Mimo R. Lemdja
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences South, Magnolia, AR, United States of America
| | - Toni L. Middleton
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences South Central, Pine Bluff, AR, United States of America
| | - Matthew W. Nix
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Southwest, Texarkana, AR, United States of America
| | | | | | - Joshua L. Kennedy
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States of America
| | - Laura P. James
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kakuhikire B, Satinsky EN, Baguma C, Rasmussen JD, Perkins JM, Gumisiriza P, Juliet M, Ayebare P, Mushavi RC, Burns BFO, Evans CQ, Siedner MJ, Bangsberg DR, Tsai AC. Correlates of attendance at community engagement meetings held in advance of bio-behavioral research studies: A longitudinal, sociocentric social network study in rural Uganda. PLoS Med 2021; 18:e1003705. [PMID: 34270581 PMCID: PMC8323877 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community engagement is central to the conduct of health-related research studies as a way to determine priorities, inform study design and implementation, increase recruitment and retention, build relationships, and ensure that research meets the goals of the community. Community sensitization meetings, a form of community engagement, are often held prior to the initiation of research studies to provide information about upcoming study activities and resolve concerns in consultation with potential participants. This study estimated demographic, health, economic, and social network correlates of attendance at community sensitization meetings held in advance of a whole-population, combined behavioral, and biomedical research study in rural Uganda. METHODS AND FINDINGS Research assistants collected survey data from 1,630 adults participating in an ongoing sociocentric social network cohort study conducted in a rural region of southwestern Uganda. These community survey data, collected between 2016 and 2018, were linked to attendance logs from community sensitization meetings held in 2018 and 2019 before the subsequent community survey and community health fair. Of all participants, 264 (16%) attended a community sensitization meeting before the community survey, 464 (28%) attended a meeting before the community health fair, 558 (34%) attended a meeting before either study activity (survey or health fair), and 170 (10%) attended a meeting before both study activities (survey and health fair). Using multivariable Poisson regression models, we estimated correlates of attendance at community sensitization meetings. Attendance was more likely among study participants who were women (adjusted relative risk [ARR]health fair = 1.71, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32 to 2.21, p < 0.001), older age (ARRsurvey = 1.02 per year, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02, p < 0.001; ARRhealth fair = 1.02 per year, 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02, p < 0.001), married (ARRsurvey = 1.74, 95% CI, 1.29 to 2.35, p < 0.001; ARRhealth fair = 1.41, 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.76, p = 0.002), and members of more community groups (ARRsurvey = 1.26 per group, 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.44, p = 0.001; ARRhealth fair = 1.26 per group, 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.43, p < 0.001). Attendance was less likely among study participants who lived farther from meeting locations (ARRsurvey = 0.54 per kilometer, 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.97, p = 0.041; ARRhealth fair = 0.57 per kilometer, 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.86, p = 0.007). Leveraging the cohort's sociocentric design, social network analyses suggested that information conveyed during community sensitization meetings could reach a broader group of potential study participants through attendees' social network and household connections. Study limitations include lack of detailed data on reasons for attendance/nonattendance at community sensitization meetings; achieving a representative sample of community members was not an explicit aim of the study; and generalizability may not extend beyond this study setting. CONCLUSIONS In this longitudinal, sociocentric social network study conducted in rural Uganda, we observed that older age, female sex, being married, membership in more community groups, and geographical proximity to meeting locations were correlated with attendance at community sensitization meetings held in advance of bio-behavioral research activities. Information conveyed during meetings could have reached a broader portion of the population through attendees' social network and household connections. To ensure broader input and potentially increase participation in health-related research studies, the dissemination of research-related information through community sensitization meetings may need to target members of underrepresented groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emily N. Satinsky
- Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Charles Baguma
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - Justin D. Rasmussen
- Department of Psychology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Jessica M. Perkins
- Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | | | - Mercy Juliet
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
| | | | - Rumbidzai C. Mushavi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Bridget F. O. Burns
- Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Claire Q. Evans
- Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America
| | - Mark J. Siedner
- Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - David R. Bangsberg
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- Oregon Health and Science University - Portland State University School of Public Health, Portland, Oregon, United States of America
| | - Alexander C. Tsai
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda
- Center for Global Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|