Role of fluoxetine in pharmacological enhancement of motor functions in stroke patients: A randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trial

Effect of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors on Motor Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in improving motor outcomes after stroke. For accuracy, we only included studies in which selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were administered to patients in the recovery phase after stroke (<6 mos after stroke).

DESIGN

Meta-analyses were conducted according to the tools used to measure motor function. We searched the SCOPUS, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies, which compared motor recovery in patients who receive selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor medication in the recovery phase after stroke with a control group that did not receive any selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.

RESULTS

A total of 3715 publications were assessed, and nine studies met the study criteria. The group, which received selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, showed improved Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale and Barthel index scores compared with the control group. However, there was no significant difference in the modified Rankin Scale scores between the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor and control groups. The incidence of adverse effects after the administration of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors did not differ from that in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor in the recovery phase of stroke improved motor function without significant increase in adverse effects.

The efficacy and safety of fluoxetine versus placebo for stroke recovery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Fluoxetine is one of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors that can improve motor and function recovery after a stroke. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have investigated the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine compared to placebo in post-stroke recovery. However, the results are still controversial.

AIM

This meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated analysis of the efficacy and safety of fluoxetine versus placebo in post-stroke recovery.

METHOD

RCTs were searched from electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Clinical Trials, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception until July 2022. Google Scholar and the reference lists of included studies were screened to identify additional studies. Outcomes were analyzed using risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Fourteen RCTs (6584 patients) were included. The fluoxetine group showed a significantly higher Fugl-Meyer motor scale (FMMS) score than the placebo group (MD 15.93, 95%CI 9.76-22.7, P < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) (mRS ≤ 2, RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.88-1.15, P = 0.95), the Barthel index (MD 12.11, 95%CI - 0.71 to 24.92, P = 0.06), and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (MD - 0.19, 95%CI - 0.43 to 0.04, P = 0.1) between the two groups. The fluoxetine group showed a lower rate of depression or anxiety than the placebo group (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.92, P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding gastrointestinal adverse reactions (P > 0.05), drowsiness (P > 0.05) or insomnia (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Fluoxetine improved FMMS and reduced anxiety and depression. More well-designed and large sample-size RCTs are required to further analyze the efficacy of fluoxetine in post-stroke recovery.

Safety and Efficacy of SSRIs in Improving Poststroke Recovery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background Several studies investigated the role of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in improving poststroke recovery; thus, we have decided to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of SSRIs in poststroke recovery. Methods and Results In this meta-analysis we searched the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The studies were included if they were placebo-controlled trials in design and reported SSRIs' effects on poststroke depression, anxiety, disability, dependence, motor abilities, and cognitive functions. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. The search yielded 44 articles that included 16 164 patients, and about half of the participants were treated with SSRIs. Our results showed that SSRIs had a significant effect on preventing depression (weighted mean difference [WMD], -7.05 [95% CI, -11.78 to -2.31]), treating depression according to the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score (WMD, -1.45 [95% CI, -2.77 to -0.14]), anxiety (relative risk, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.09-0.61]), dependence (WMD, 8.86 [95% CI, 1.23-16.48]), motor abilities according to National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (WMD, -0.79 [95% CI, -1.42 to -0.15]), and cognitive functions (WMD, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.12-1.89]). On the other hand, no significant effect of SSRIs on disability was observed. Additionally, we found that treating with SSRIs increased the risk of seizures (relative risk, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.13-1.83]), whereas there was no difference in the incidence of gastrointestinal symptoms or bleeding between SSRIs and a placebo. Conclusions Our study showed that SSRIs are effective in preventing and treating depression, and improving anxiety, motor function, cognitive function, and dependence in patients after stroke. These benefits were only reproducible with the citalopram subanalysis but not fluoxetine. Further well-conducted placebo-controlled trials are needed to investigate the safety and efficacy of citalopram among patients after stroke. Registration URL: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021285766.