Maintenance of ovulation inhibition with a new progestogen-only pill containing drospirenone after scheduled 24-h delays in pill intake

A phase I/II study evaluating the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of drospirenone as an oral contraceptive in Japanese women

AIM

Drospirenone (DRSP) is a synthetic progestogen approved as a progestin-only pill for contraception in both the United States and Europe. Herein, we conducted a phase I/II study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of DRSP in Japanese women.

METHODS

Single and multiple doses of 4 mg of DRSP were orally administered to healthy premenopausal Japanese women. In the multiple-dose period, 4 mg of DRSP was administered once daily for 24 days. Pharmacokinetics, hormone levels, and adverse events (AEs) were investigated.

RESULTS

Twelve Japanese women participated in this study. The single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of DRSP was similar to that reported in previous studies in Caucasians. In the multiple-dose period, no subject displayed a progesterone level of more than 5.03 ng/mL. AEs were observed in 11 (91.7%) subjects. The most common AE was genital hemorrhage, which was observed in six (50.0%) subjects, followed by diarrhea and acne in four (33.3%) subjects each. All AEs resolved or improved at the end of the study, and complete recovery was confirmed in all subjects at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The pharmacokinetics of DRSP in Japanese women was similar to that of previous studies performed in Caucasian women. Repeated administration of DRSP maintained low plasma progesterone levels indicating effective inhibition of ovulation. No notable safety concerns were observed. In this phase I/II study, DRSP had no obvious pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, or safety issues to consider in Japanese women.

Use of the drospirenone-only contraceptive pill in adolescents with endometriosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a progestin-only pill containing 4 mg drospirenone (DRSP) as a hormonal therapy for the management of endometriosis-associated symptoms in adolescents and young adults Design: Retrospective cohort study METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of all adolescents who were prescribed DRSP continuously (without placebo) for treatment of endometriosis at a single pediatric tertiary care center between 2019 and 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain demographics and clinical characteristics of the patients. Measured outcomes included symptom resolution and medication discontinuation. The study was deemed IRB exempt.

RESULTS

A total of 61 patients with endometriosis were prescribed DRSP during the study period, with a median age of 18.9 years (SD 2.3). The majority (97%) were laparoscopically confirmed to have endometriosis, and 85% had stage I disease. Before DRSP use, the most common medications trialed were norethindrone (57%) and norethindrone acetate (68%), and 56% had at least one medical contraindication to receiving estrogen-containing therapy. Of those with follow-up, 52% established an absence of bleeding/spotting, and 67% reported less pain at follow-up. One in four patients discontinued DRSP during the study period, most commonly due to breakthrough bleeding.

CONCLUSION

DRSP is a well-tolerated and effective option for the treatment of endometriosis-associated symptoms in adolescents and young adults.

Opill: The Over-the-Counter Contraceptive Pill

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved the first oral contraceptive pill (OCP) for over-the-counter status. This progestin-only pill contains norgestrel 0.075 mg taken daily, with a Pearl Index estimated at 4.4 (95% CI, 1.9-8.8). This formulation has an excellent safety profile, with current breast cancer as the only absolute contraindication and few relative contraindications. Ultimately, this approval has great potential to improve the accessibility of effective contraception for many pregnancy-capable Americans, especially those who have poor access to the health care system for prescription-required contraception, most notably people who hold marginalized identities. The pill's overall success in reducing rates of unintended pregnancy will rely on its availability, particularly in rural communities that may rely on one pharmacy, and affordability, especially for uninsured or underinsured individuals. However, given the need for improved contraceptive provision, particularly in abortion-restrictive settings, the over-the-counter approval of this daily OCP is a major advancement in the nation's contraceptive ecosystem.

Reversible female contraceptives: historical, current, and future perspectives†

Contraception is a practice with extensive and complicated social and scientific histories. From cycle tracking, to the very first prescription contraceptive pill, to now having over-the-counter contraceptives on demand, family planning is an aspect of healthcare that has undergone and will continue to undergo several transformations through time. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current reversible hormonal and non-hormonal birth control methods as well as their mechanism of action, safety, and effectiveness specifically for individuals who can become pregnant. Additionally, we discuss the latest Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved hormonal method containing estetrol and drospirenone that has not yet been used worldwide as well as the first FDA-approved hormonal over-the-counter progestin-only pills. We also review available data on novel hormonal delivery through microchip, microneedle, and the latest FDA-approved non-hormonal methods such as vaginal pH regulators. Finally, this review will assist in advancing female contraceptive method development by underlining constructive directions for future pursuits. Information was gathered from the NCBI and Google Scholars databases using English and included publications from 1900 to present. Search terms included contraceptive names as well as efficacy, safety, and mechanism of action. In summary, we suggest that investigators consider the side effects and acceptability together with the efficacy of contraceptive candidate towards their development.

Experiences of progestin-only pill users in the United States and attitudes toward over-the-counter access

CONTEXT

Removing the prescription requirement and making oral contraceptive pills available over the counter (OTC) could increase contraceptive access in the United States. Despite current efforts to make a progestin-only pill (POP) available OTC, there are no qualitative data exploring the experiences of POP users and their perspectives on making POPs available OTC.

METHODS

We conducted six online, asynchronous focus group discussions with 36 POP users between July and November 2020. We stratified focus group discussion placement based on three reasons for POP use: breastfeeding, having a contraindication to estrogen (for a reason other than breastfeeding), and for any other reason. We thematically analyzed these data using inductive and deductive coding.

RESULTS

The majority of participants described their overall POP experience as positive, mostly because they experienced minor or no side effects and thought the pill was effective. Participants overwhelmingly supported OTC availability of POPs and expressed interest in purchasing an OTC POP. Over one-third of participants had very limited knowledge or held inaccurate assumptions about POPs before they started using this method and many stressed the need to disseminate accurate information and resources about POPs to the public.

CONCLUSIONS

Most focus group discussion participants were satisfied with POPs and supported OTC access. While misconceptions and concerns about POPs should be addressed, an OTC POP has the potential to be a safe, effective, and convenient contraceptive option in the United States.

Effectiveness and efficacy rates of progestin-only pills: A comprehensive literature review

OBJECTIVES

To synthesize published literature on POP effectiveness and efficacy.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched PubMed Central, PubMed, and the Cochrane library through March 07, 2022. We included articles written in English reporting a Pearl Index or life table rate for pregnancy. We excluded articles only assessing formulations that: were never marketed globally, are only sold in combination with estrogen, are currently sold only for noncontraceptive purposes, or were not given to participants continuously. Four researchers independently extracted data and two analyzed data using Excel and R.

RESULTS

We included 54 studies. Among studies at low or moderate risk of bias, the median Pearl Index rate (the failure rate during typical use) was 1.63 (range 0.00-14.20, IQR 4.03) and the median method failure Pearl Index rate (the failure rate during perfect use) was 0.97 (range 0.40-6.50, IQR 0.68). Excluding the newer formulations, Desogestrel and Drospirenone, which are closer to combined oral contraceptives in that they prevent pregnancy by inhibiting ovulation, the median Pearl Index rate is 2.00 (range 0.00-14.12, IQR 2.5) and the median method failure Pearl Index rate is 1.05 (range 0.00-10.90, IQR 1.38).

CONCLUSIONS

Among studies at low or moderate risk of bias, the median Pearl Index rate during typical POP use was much lower than currently estimated (7.00), while the median perfect use rate was similar to current estimates.

IMPLICATIONS

Future research should investigate the possibility that POPs may be much more effective during typical use than currently believed.

A commentary on progestin-only pills and the "three-hour window" guidelines: Timing of ingestion and mechanisms of action

Clinical guidelines for progestin-only pills (POPs) state that each pill should be taken at the same time each day, with only a "three-hour window" of tolerance before back-up contraception should be used. In this commentary, we summarize studies examining the timing of ingestion and mechanisms of action for various POP formulations and dosages. We found that different progestins have different properties that determine the effect of delayed or missed pills on effectiveness at preventing pregnancy. Our findings highlight that there is more margin for error for some POPs than guidelines suggest. The three-hour window recommendation should be re-evaluated in light of these findings. Since clinicians, potential POP users, and regulatory bodies rely on current guidelines to make decisions about POP use, a critical evaluation and update of these guidelines are urgently needed.

Evaluation of the food effect on a drospirenone only contraceptive containing 4 mg administered with and without high-fat breakfast in a randomised trial

Background

The objective of the present trial was to assess the difference in pharmacokinetics (PK) of an oral test preparation containing 4 mg drospirenone (DRSP) under fasting conditions compared to PK upon food intake after single dose administration.

Methods

Open label, single centre, two-treatment, two-sequence, crossover study in 24 healthy female volunteers, with duration of 1 day per sequence and with a real wash-out period of 14 days to investigate the relative bioavailability of DRSP with both forms of administration. The 90% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for the intra-individual ratio (test with food vs. without food) of the PK endpoints Area under the curve; 0–72 h [AUC(0-72 h₎] and maximal plasma concentration [Cmax] of DRSP.

Results

The 90% CI calculated by analysis of variance using logistic transformation (ANOVA-log) for the endpoint, intra-individual ratio (Test ‘A’ = with food intake) vs. Test ‘B’ = without food intake) of AUC(0-72 h) of drospirenone was between 104.72 and 111.36%. The 90% CI calculated by means of ANOVA- log for the endpoint intra-individual ratio (Test ‘A’ vs. Test ‘B’) of Cmax of DRSP was between 118.58 and 141.10%. The mean relative bioavailability of the test with food ‘A’ compared to the Test without food ‘B’ after single dose administration based on the endpoints AUC(0-72 h₎ was 107.99%; for the endpoint Cmax it was 129.35%.

Conclusions

The rate of absorption, based on the endpoint Cmax of DRSP was increased by about 30% under fed conditions. With respect to consumer habits, this may represent a relevant benefit for contraceptive safety, as the time span between food consumption and pill intake does not play a role.

Implications

Our results suggest that the food intake has no impact on the absorption of 4 mg DRSP in the management of contraception. This increases the contraceptive efficacy as no interference with food is expected when consuming the oral formulation under real life conditions.

Trail registration: Trial registration number: EudraCT-No: 2012–004,309-28.

The Impact of Hormonal Contraceptive Use on Serotonergic Neurotransmission and Antidepressant Treatment Response: Results From the NeuroPharm 1 Study

BACKGROUND

Hormonal contraceptive (HC) use has been associated with an increased risk of developing a depressive episode. This might be related to HC's effect on the serotonergic brain system as suggested by recent cross-sectional data from our group, which show that healthy oral contraceptive (OC) users relative to non-users have lower cerebral serotonin 4 receptor (5-HT4R) levels. Here, we determine if cerebral 5-HT4R binding differs between HC non-users, OC users, and hormonal intrauterine device (HIUD) users among women with an untreated depressive episode. Also, we test if antidepressant drug treatment response and its association with pre-treatment 5-HT4R binding depends on HC status.

METHODS

[¹¹C]-SB207145 Positron Emission Tomography imaging data from the NeuroPharm-NP1 Study (NCT02869035) were available from 59 depressed premenopausal women, of which 26 used OCs and 10 used HIUDs. The participants were treated with escitalopram. Treatment response was measured as the relative change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 6 items (rΔHAMD₆) from baseline to week eight. Latent variable models were used to evaluate the association between global 5-HT4R binding and OC and HIUD use as well as rΔHAMD₆.

RESULTS

We found no evidence of a difference in global 5-HT4R binding between depressed HC users and non-users (p≥0.51). A significant crossover interaction (p=0.02) was observed between non-users and OC users in the association between baseline global 5-HT4R binding and week eight rΔHAMD₆; OC users had 3-4% lower binding compared to non-users for every 10% percent less improvement in HAMD₆. Within the groups, we observed a trend towards a positive association in non-users (p_adj=0.10) and a negative association in OC users (p_adj=0.07). We found no strong evidence of a difference in treatment response between the groups (p=0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

We found no difference in 5-HT4R binding between HC users vs. non-users in depressed women, however, it seemed that 5-HT4R settings differed qualitatively in their relation to antidepressant drug treatment response between OC users and non-users. From this we speculate that depressed OC users constitutes a special serotonin subtype of depression, which might have implications for antidepressant drug treatment response.

Contraception Selection, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Many women spend a substantial proportion of their lives preventing or planning for pregnancy, and approximately 87% of US women use contraception during their lifetime.

OBSERVATIONS

Contraceptive effectiveness is determined by a combination of drug or device efficacy, individual fecundability, coital frequency, and user adherence and continuation. In the US, oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used reversible method of contraception and comprise 21.9% of all contraception in current use. Pregnancy rates of women using oral contraceptives are 4% to 7% per year. Use of long-acting methods, such as intrauterine devices and subdermal implants, has increased substantially, from 6% of all contraceptive users in 2008 to 17.8% in 2016; these methods have failure rates of less than 1% per year. Estrogen-containing methods, such as combined oral contraceptive pills, increase the risk of venous thrombosis from 2 to 10 venous thrombotic events per 10 000 women-years to 7 to 10 venous thrombotic events per 10 000 women-years, whereas progestin-only and nonhormonal methods, such as implants and condoms, are associated with rare serious risks. Hormonal contraceptives can improve medical conditions associated with hormonal changes related to the menstrual cycle, such as acne, endometriosis, and premenstrual dysphoric disorder. Optimal contraceptive selection requires patient and clinician discussion of the patient's tolerance for risk of pregnancy, menstrual bleeding changes, other risks, and personal values and preferences.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Oral contraceptive pills are the most commonly used reversible contraceptives, intrauterine devices and subdermal implants have the highest effectiveness, and progestin-only and nonhormonal methods have the lowest risks. Optimal contraceptive selection incorporates patient values and preferences.

Contraceptive Technology: Present and Future

Many sexually active, reproductive-aged persons capable of becoming pregnant use some method of contraception. To expand options for those desiring birth control, new choices include a vaginal ring, transdermal patch, progestin-only pill, and spermicide. Compared with currently available methods, additional technologies that are highly effective, easy to use, cost efficient, and well-tolerated lay on the horizon. During contraceptive counseling, patient choice, and reproductive autonomy should remain paramount.

Differences in postpartum contraceptive choices and patterns following low- and high-risk pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of a high-risk pregnancy on postpartum contraceptive planning and use.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women who gave birth in a teaching hospital in 2020. We classified women into 2 groups based on their risk status according to the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. The World Health Organization (WHO) tiers of contraceptive efficacy were used to categorize contraceptive planning and administration. The primary outcome was the utilization rate of Tier 1contraceptive methods at their postpartum visit in women with prior high-risk pregnancy. Univariate and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine the relationships between risk status, characteristics, contraceptive preference, and actual utilization.

RESULTS

This study included 788 low-risk and 482 high-risk postpartum women. High risk women indicated greater interest in (43.5% low-risk vs 52.2% high-risk, p < 0.01) and usage rates of (45.7% low-risk vs 54.3% high-risk, p = 0.01) Tier 1 contraception. The most commonly chosen contraceptive methods among low- and high-risk women were progestin-only pills (30.6%) and tubal ligation (36.4%), respectively. Uptake rates of immediate postpartum contraceptive implants did not differ between low (9.3%) and high-risk (11%) women (p = 0.32). Few patients adopted intrauterine devices (1.1%).

CONCLUSION

High-risk status was associated with intention to use and uptake of effective contraceptive methods, which persisted through the postpartum period.

IMPLICATIONS

To assist women in achieving the recommended interpregnancy intervals, counseling tailored to their individual risks and needs should be provided. Reasons for low intrauterine devices uptake should be explored. Postnatal care should include immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) services.

Oral Progestins in Hormonal Contraception: Importance and Future Perspectives of a New Progestin Only-Pill Containing 4 mg Drospirenone

Hormonal contraceptives are an effective and safe method for preventing pregnancy. Progestins used in contraception are either components of combined hormonal contraceptives (tablets, patches or vaginal rings) or are used as a single active ingredient in progestin mono-preparations (the progestin-only pill (POP), implants, intrauterine systems or depot preparations). Progestins are highly effective in long-term contraception when used properly, and have a very good safety profile with very few contraindications. A new oestrogen-free ovulation inhibitor (POP) has recently been authorised in the USA and the EU. This progestin mono-preparation contains 4 mg of drospirenone (DRSP), which has anti-gonadotropic, anti-mineralocorticoidic and anti-androgenic properties. The hormone administration regimen of 24 days followed by a 4-day hormone-free period was chosen to improve bleeding control and to maintain oestradiol concentrations at early follicular-phase levels, preventing oestrogen deficiency. Clinical trials have demonstrated a high contraceptive effectiveness, a very low risk of cardiovascular side effects and a favourable menstrual bleeding pattern. Due to the long half-life of DRSP (30 - 34 hours), the effectiveness of the preparation is maintained even if a woman forgets to take a pill on a single occasion. Studies involving deliberate 24-hour delays in taking a pill have demonstrated that ovulation inhibition is maintained if a single pill is missed. Following a summary of the current status of oestrogen-free contraception, this review article will describe the clinical development programme of the 4 mg DRSP mono-preparation and the resulting data on the effectiveness and safety of this new oestrogen-free oral hormonal contraceptive.

Drospirenone: a Latin American perspective for oestrogen-free oral contraception

AIM

Combined hormonal contraceptives, despite their high efficacy, are associated with an increased relative risk of cardiovascular events. The contraceptive mechanism of action of combined pills depends fundamentally on their progestin component.

METHODS

A narrative review was performed.

RESULTS

The drospirenone-only pill, including this synthetic progestogen with antimineralocorticoid and antiandrogenic activity, has high contraceptive efficacy that has been demonstrated with a 24-day schedule of 4-day administration of hormone-free pills. Due to its safety profile, the drospirenone-only pill is suitable even in high-risk populations, such as women with high blood pressure, thromboembolism, smoking or dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSION

Considering the increasing prevalence of these comorbidities in Latin America, the 4 mg drospirenone-only pill is suggested as one of the strategies of choice in the region for those women who choose oral contraceptives.

Advances in contraception research and development

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the past few years, there have been great advances in contraceptive technology and development. Here we review advances in contraception over the past two years including new medications, and technologies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Contraception must be discussed within the context of individual goals and context. New contraceptive options approved by the FDA in the past two years include a year-long vaginal ring, a progestin-only pill that is as effective as combined oral contraceptive pills, a new hormonal patch and a vaginal gel that may also help prevent sexually transmitted infections.There are still areas of contraceptive research that are very much unknown including biomarkers of contraceptive efficacy or side effects, how individuals or groups metabolize contraception, initiation around reproductive life events or the discontinuation of other methods.

SUMMARY

There have been many new contraceptives developed over the past few years to address challenges of existing contraception and create new methods; yet, there remain many unanswered questions in contraceptive research. Contraceptive technology has far-reaching consequences, and independent of technology itself, represents a great opportunity for truly personalized medicine.

Bleeding profile of women using a drospirenone-only pill 4 mg over nine cycles in comparison with desogestrel 0.075 mg

BACKGROUND

Progestin-only pills are associated with irregular bleeding pattern including amenorrhea. Desogestrel 75mcg even being a pill that inhibits ovulation shows a poor cycle control that limits a more common use. A drospirenone (DRSP)-only pill was developed to improve the bleeding profile.

METHODS

A phase III study in healthy women aged 18 to 45 years was performed to compare the bleeding profile and safety of women taking a DRSP only pill in a regime of 24 days of 4 mg of DRSP tablets followed by 4 days of placebo versus desogestrel 0.075 mg per day continuously over 9 cycles. A total of 858 women with 6691 drospirenone and 332 women with 2487 desogestrel treatment cycles were analyzed. The primary endpoint was the proportion of women with bleeding/spotting days in each cycle from cycles 2 to 9 and cumulative in cycles 2 to 4 and cycles 7 to 9 including and excluding those with amenorrhea.

FINDINGS

In each cycle, up to cycle 7, the proportion of women with unscheduled bleeding including those which did not bleed was statistically significantly lower in the DRSP group than in the DSG group (p = 0.0001, chi-square test). The mean [SD] number of unscheduled bleeding and spotting days during cycles 2-9 was statistically significantly lower in the DRSP group than in the DSG group (21.5 [22.86] days vs. 34.7 [33.73] days, p = 0.0003, Wilcoxon-rank-sum-test). Excluding amenorrhoeic women following results were obtained: In the cycles 2-6, the proportion of women with unscheduled bleeding was statistically significantly lower in the DRSP group than in the DSG group (p = 0.0001, chi-square test). The mean [SD] number of bleeding days was 8.6 [8.52] days vs. 12.9 [16.47] days, p = 0.0233.

CONCLUSIONS

This report describes the improvement in bleeding profile of women using the new DRSP only oral contraceptive in comparison to DSG providing a better quality of live and adherence to the contraceptive method. EudraCT registration number: 2011-002396-42.

A 1-year prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase 3 trial of the contraceptive efficacy and safety of the oral progestin-only pill drospirenone 4 mg using a 24/4-day regimen

Objectives

To evaluate contraceptive effectiveness and safety of oral drospirenone 4 mg 24/4-day regimen in the United States.

Study design

We performed a prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase 3 trial in sexually active women for up to thirteen 28-day treatment cycles. Primary outcome was the Pearl index, calculated using confirmed on-drug pregnancies and evaluable cycles in nonbreastfeeding women aged ≤ 35 years. We assessed adverse events (AEs), including hyperkalemia and venous thromboembolism.

Results

Of 1006 women who received at least one dose of drospirenone, 352 women (35.0%) completed the trial and 654 (65.0%) women discontinued before trial end. Most participants (92.2%) were ≤ 35 years; one third had a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m². Among nonbreastfeeding women aged ≤ 35 years, there were 17 pregnancies (Pearl index: 4.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-6.4; n = 953), of which three were unconfirmed and two were from sites excluded from the main analysis for major breaches of Food and Drug Administration regulations. The Pearl index was 2.9 (95% CI: 1.5-5.1) for confirmed pregnancies among 915 nonbreastfeeding women aged ≤ 35 years from sites with no protocol violations. Nearly all (95.4%) treatment-emergent AEs were mild or moderate in intensity. No cases of venous thromboembolism were reported. The frequency of hyperkalemia was 0.5%. Women with baseline systolic/diastolic blood pressure ≥ 130/85 mmHg had a mean reduction from baseline in blood pressure at exit visit (- 8.5/- 4.9 mmHg; n = 119). No other clinically relevant changes were observed. Participant satisfaction was high.

Conclusion

Drospirenone 4 mg 24/4 regimen provides effective contraception with a good safety/tolerability profile in a broad group of women, including overweight or obese women.

Implications

This new progestin-only contraceptive, drospirenone 4 mg in a 24/4 regimen, provides a contraceptive option for the majority of women regardless of blood pressure or BMI.

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial on the bleeding profile of a drospirenone-only pill 4 mg over nine cycles in comparison with desogestrel 0.075 mg

PURPOSE

A typical compliance problem in the use of traditional progestin-only pills is the irregular bleeding pattern and the strict daily intake. Desogestrel 75 mg has a 12-h missed-pill window; however, its poor cycle control limits a more common use.

METHODS

A drospirenone (DRSP)-only pill was developed to improve the bleeding profile.

SETTING

A phase III study in healthy women aged 18-45 years was performed to compare the bleeding profile and safety of a DRSP-only pill in a regime of 24 days of 4 mg of DRSP tablets followed by 4 days of placebo versus desogestrel 0.075 mg per day continuously over nine cycles.

POPULATION

A total of 858 women with 6691 drospirenone and 332 women with 2487 desogestrel treatment cycles were analyzed.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was the proportion of women with unscheduled bleeding/spotting in each cycle from cycles 2 to 9 and cumulative in cycles 2-4 and cycles 7-9.

RESULTS

In each cycle, up to cycle 7, the proportion of women with unscheduled bleeding was statistically significantly lower in the DRSP group than in the DSG group (p = 0.0001, Chi-square test).

CONCLUSIONS

This report describes the improvement in bleeding profile of women using the new DRSP-only oral contraceptive in comparison to DSG, providing a better quality of live and adherence to the contraceptive method. EudraCT Registration Number: 2011-002396-42.

Comparative pharmacokinetic estimates of drospirenone alone and in combination with ethinyl estradiol after single and repeated oral administration in healthy females

OBJECTIVE

To determine the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drospirenone (DRSP), alone versus in combination with ethinyl estradiol (EE), after single and repeated administration.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a single-centre, open-label, crossover, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence study in which non-micronized DRSP 4 mg or a combination of DRSP 3 mg and EE 0.02 mg were administered to healthy female subjects on day 1 to obtain a single-dose kinetic profile, and from day 4 to day 15 to obtain a repeated-dose kinetic profile. The maximum observed concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration/time curve (AUC) were determined in a model-independent way using non dose corrected data. Statistical analysis was based on a parametric method (ANOVA-log).

RESULTS

A total of 24 healthy female subjects were randomized 1:1 into the study. The mean relative, non-dose-corrected PK estimates after single-dose administration for the endpoints AUC_(0-72h), AUC_(0-24h) and C_max were 543.5 ng*h/mL, 296.1 ng*h/mL and 27.3 ng/mL for DRSP alone, and 442.0 ng*h/mL, 264.7 ng*h/mL and 37.5 ng/mL for the DRSP/EE combination; p < 0.001. The mean relative, non-dose-corrected PK estimates after repeated dose administration for the endpoints AUC_(0-72h), AUC_(0-24h) and C_max were 1066.8 ng*h/ml, 570.2 ng*h/mL and 41.0 ng/mL for DRSP alone, and 1394.5 ng*h/mL, 732.8 ng*h/mL and 61.4 ng/mL for the DRSP/EE combination; p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

DRSP alone exhibits a lower accumulation ratio than together with EE. The extent of systemic exposure at steady-state is about 32% less with the new formulation (AUC_(0-24h), steady-state geometric mean ratio: 77.8%; 90% confidence interval: 74.6%-81.1%). This PK profile may be caused by EE.

IMPLICATIONS

Our results suggest that metabolic pathways of DRSP can be inhibited by EE resulting in higher DRSP plasma concentrations in DRSP/EE formulations than in a DRSP-alone formulation. The enzymes CYP3A4 and SULT1A1 may play a role. Additional drug-drug-interaction studies are needed to better understand these metabolic pathways and their future clinical implications.

Clinical relevance in present day hormonal contraception

The contraceptive pill is an effective and very safe method to control pregnancies. It was developed 60 years ago, and despite that the composition has been the same since it was first developed (estrogen and progestogen), over the years the concentration of ethinyl estradiol has been reduced to improve tolerability. Nevertheless, progestogens are the basic active agent of hormonal contraception. The mechanism of progestogens is a multimodal one and basically three modes of contraceptive action can be distinguished: (a) A strong antigonadotrophic action leading to the inhibition of ovulation. The necessary dosage of ovulation inhibition per day is a fixed dosage that is intrinsic to each progestogen and independent of the dosage of estrogen used or the partial activities of the progestogen or the mode of application. (b) Thickening of the cervical mucus to inhibit sperm penetration and (c) desynchronization of the endometrial changes necessary for implantation. The on the market available progestogens used for contraception are either used in combined hormonal contraceptives (in tablets, patches or vaginal rings) or as progestogen only contraceptives. Progestogen only contraceptives are available as daily oral preparations, monthly injections, implants (2-3 years) and intrauterine systems (IUS). Even the long-acting progestogens are highly effective in typical use and have a very low risk profile. According to their introduction into the market, progestogens in combined hormonal contraceptives, have been described as 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th generation progestogens. The different structures of progestogens are derivatives from testosterone, progesterone and spironolactone. These differences in the molecular structure determine pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differential effects which contribute to the tolerability and additional beneficial or therapeutic effects whether used in combined oral contraceptive (COC) or as progestogen only drugs. These differences enhance the individual options for different patient profiles. The new development of polymers for vaginal rings allowed on the one hand, the improvement of the estrogen/progestogen combination in these rings especially regarding the comfort of use for women (e.g. avoiding the use of cold chains or packages with up to 6-month rings) and on the other hand, the development of progestogen only formulations. Another future development will be the introduction of new progestogen only pills that will provide effective contraceptive protection with more favorable bleeding patterns and a maintenance of ovulation inhibition after scheduled 24-h delays in pill intake than the existing progestogen only pill (POP) with desogestrel (DES).

The clinical relevance of progestogens in hormonal contraception: Present status and future developments

The contraceptive pill is an effective and very safe method to control pregnancies. It was developed 60 years ago, and despite, that the composition has been the same since it was first developed (estrogen and progestogen), along the years the concentration of ethinyl estradiol has been reduced to improve tolerability. Nevertheless, progestogens are the basic active agent of hormonal contraception. The mechanism of progestogens is a multimodal one and basically three modes of contraceptive action can be distinguished: (a) A strong antigonadotrophic action leading to the inhibition of ovulation. The necessary dosage of ovulation inhibition per day is a fixed dosage that is inherent to each progestogen and independent of the dosage of estrogen used or the partial activities of the progestogen or the mode of application. (b) Thickening of the cervical mucus to inhibit sperm penetration and (c) Desynchronization of the endometrial changes necessary for implantation. The on the market available progestogens used for contraception are either used in combined hormonal contraceptives (in tablets, patches, or vaginal rings) or as progestogen only contraceptives. Progestogen only contraceptives are available as daily oral preparations, monthly injections, implants (2-3 years), and Intrauterine Systems (IUS). Even the long acting progestogens are highly effective in typical use and have a very low risk profile, with few contraindications. According to their introduction into the market progestogens, in combined hormonal contraceptives, have been described as first, second, third and fourth generation progestogens. Also, progestogens can be derived from testosterone, progesterone, and spironolactone that determine pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differential effects. These effects contribute to the tolerability and additional beneficial or therapeutic effects whether used in combined oral contraceptives COC or as progestogen only drugs enhancing the individual options for different patient profiles. The new development of polymers for vaginal rings allowed on one side the improvement of the estrogen/progestogen combination in these rings especially regarding the comfort of use for women (avoiding of cold chain use or packages with up to six-month rings e.g.) and on the other side the development of progestogen only formulations. Another future development will be the introduction of new progestogen only pills that will provide effective contraceptive protection with more favourable bleeding patterns and a maintenance of ovulation inhibition after scheduled 24-h delays in pill intake than the existing pop with desogestrel.

Progestins used in endocrine therapy and the implications for the biosynthesis and metabolism of endogenous steroid hormones

Steroidogenesis refers to the de novo synthesis of steroid hormones from cholesterol by a number of sequential enzyme catalysed reactions in the adrenal and the gonads. In addition, circulating steroid hormone precursors are further metabolised in selected peripheral tissues. It has been suggested that the biosynthesis of endogenous steroid hormones can be modulated by progestins, used widely by women in female reproductive medicine. However, as a number of structurally diverse progestins with different pharmacological properties are available, it is possible that these synthetic compounds may vary in their effects on steroidogenesis. This review summarises the evidence indicating that progestins influence the biosynthesis of steroid hormones in the adrenal and gonads, as well as the metabolism of these endogenous hormones in the breast, highlighting the limitations to the current knowledge and directions for future research.