Association of Ambient Air Pollution with Blood Pressure in Adolescence: A Systematic-review and Meta-analysis

Differing associations of PM2.5 exposure with systolic and diastolic blood pressures across exposure durations in a predominantly non-Hispanic Black cohort

Environmental health research has suggested that fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure can lead to high blood pressures, but it is unclear whether the impacts remain the same for systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP). This study aimed to examine whether the effects of PM2.5 exposure on SBP and DBP differ using data from a predominantly non-Hispanic Black cohort collected between 2013 and 2019 in the US. PM2.5 exposure was assessed based on a satellite-derived model across exposure durations from 1 to 36 months. The average PM2.5 exposure level was between 9.5 and 9.8 μg/m3 from 1 through 36 months. Mixed effects models were used to estimate the association of PM2.5 with SBP, DBP, and related hypertension types, adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 6381 participants were included. PM2.5 exposure was positively associated with both SBP and DBP. The association magnitudes depended on exposure durations. The association with SBP was null at the 1-month duration (β = 0.05, 95% CI: - 0.23, 0.33), strengthened as duration increased, and plateaued at the 24-month duration (β = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.54, 1.73). The association with DBP started with β = 0.29 (95% CI: 0.11, 0.47) at the 1-month duration, and plateaued at the 12-month duration (β = 1.61, 95% CI: 1.23, 1.99). PM2.5 was associated with isolated diastolic hypertension (12-month duration: odds ratio = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.34) and systolic-diastolic hypertension (12-month duration: odds ratio = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.10, 1.26), but not with isolated systolic hypertension. The findings suggest DBP is more sensitive to PM2.5 exposure and support differing effects of PM2.5 exposure on SBP and DBP. As elevation of SBP and DBP differentially predict CVD outcomes, this finding is relevant for prevention and treatment.

The Health-Related and Learning Performance Effects of Air Pollution and Other Urban-Related Environmental Factors on School-Age Children and Adolescents-A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This scoping review aims to assess the impact of air pollution, traffic noise, heat, and green and blue space exposures on the physical and cognitive development of school-age children and adolescents. While existing evidence indicates adverse effects of transport-related exposures on their health, a comprehensive scoping review is necessary to consolidate findings on various urban environmental exposures' effects on children's development.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is consistent evidence on how air pollution negatively affects children's cognitive and respiratory health and learning performance, increasing their susceptibility to diseases in their adult life. Scientific evidence on heat and traffic noise, while less researched, indicates that they negatively affect children's health. On the contrary, green space exposure seems to benefit or mitigate these adverse effects, suggesting a potential strategy to promote children's cognitive and physical development in urban settings. This review underscores the substantial impact of urban exposures on the physical and mental development of children and adolescents. It highlights adverse health effects that can extend into adulthood, affecting academic opportunities and well-being beyond health. While acknowledging the necessity for more research on the mechanisms of air pollution effects and associations with heat and noise exposure, the review advocates prioritizing policy changes and urban planning interventions. This includes minimizing air pollution and traffic noise while enhancing urban vegetation, particularly in school environments, to ensure the healthy development of children and promote lifelong health.

Systems for rating bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of air pollution exposure and reproductive and children's health: a methodological survey

BACKGROUND

Translating findings from systematic reviews assessing associations between environmental exposures and reproductive and children's health into policy recommendations requires valid and transparent evidence grading.

METHODS

We aimed to evaluate systems for grading bodies of evidence used in systematic reviews of environmental exposures and reproductive/ children's health outcomes, by conducting a methodological survey of air pollution research, comprising a comprehensive search for and assessment of all relevant systematic reviews. To evaluate the frameworks used for rating the internal validity of primary studies and for grading bodies of evidence (multiple studies), we considered whether and how specific criteria or domains were operationalized to address reproductive/children's environmental health, e.g., whether the timing of exposure assessment was evaluated with regard to vulnerable developmental stages.

RESULTS

Eighteen out of 177 (9.8%) systematic reviews used formal systems for rating the body of evidence; 15 distinct internal validity assessment tools for primary studies, and nine different grading systems for bodies of evidence were used, with multiple modifications applied to the cited approaches. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework, neither developed specifically for this field, were the most commonly used approaches for rating individual studies and bodies of evidence, respectively. Overall, the identified approaches were highly heterogeneous in both their comprehensiveness and their applicability to reproductive/children's environmental health research.

CONCLUSION

Establishing the wider use of more appropriate evidence grading methods is instrumental both for strengthening systematic review methodologies, and for the effective development and implementation of environmental public health policies, particularly for protecting pregnant persons and children.