18F-Fludeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography for Assessing Tumor Response to Immunotherapy and Detecting Immune-Related Side Effects: A Checklist for the PET Reader

Retroperitoneal Inflammation Detected on FDG PET/CT in Patient on Long-Term Immunotherapy

ABSTRACT

A 68-year-old man with a history of pulmonary adenocarcinoma on maintenance pembrolizumab presented for surveillance imaging. 18 F-FDG PET/CT demonstrated new ill-defined right retroperitoneal and presacral soft tissue stranding with associated FDG uptake suggestive of inflammation. Biopsy results revealed fibroadipose tissue with extensive lymphoplasmacytic inflammation concerning for immunotherapy-related toxicity. The patient was subsequently taken off pembrolizumab, which he had been on for approximately 3 years. Recognition of immunotherapy-related adverse effects and how they can manifest on 18 F-FDG PET/CT is important for prompt cessation of treatment.

FDG-PET/CT in the Monitoring of Lymphoma Immunotherapy Response: Current Status and Future Prospects

Cancer immunotherapy has been extensively investigated in lymphoma over the last three decades. This new treatment modality is now established as a way to manage and maintain several stages and subtypes of lymphoma. The establishment of this novel therapy has necessitated the development of new imaging response criteria to evaluate and follow up with cancer patients. Several FDG PET/CT-based response criteria have emerged to address and encompass the various most commonly observed response patterns. Many of the proposed response criteria are currently being used to evaluate and predict responses. The purpose of this review is to address the efficacy and side effects of cancer immunotherapy and to correlate this with the proposed criteria and relevant patterns of FDG PET/CT in lymphoma immunotherapy as applicable. The latest updates and future prospects in lymphoma immunotherapy, as well as PET/CT potentials, will be discussed.

Imaging assessment of toxicity related to immune checkpoint inhibitors

In recent years, a wide range of cancer immunotherapies have been developed and have become increasingly important in cancer treatment across multiple oncologic diseases. In particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer promising options to improve patient outcomes. However, a major limitation of these treatments consists in the development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurring in potentially any organ system and affecting up to 76% of the patients. The most frequent toxicities involve the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and endocrine system. Although mostly manageable, potentially life-threatening events, particularly due to neuro-, cardiac, and pulmonary toxicity, occur in up to 30% and 55% of the patients treated with ICI-monotherapy or -combination therapy, respectively. Imaging, in particular computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT), plays an important role in the detection and characterization of these irAEs. In some patients, irAEs can even be detected on imaging before the onset of clinical symptoms. In this context, it is particularly important to distinguish irAEs from true disease progression and specific immunotherapy related response patterns, such as pseudoprogression. In addition, there are irAEs which might be easily confused with other pathologies such as infection or metastasis. However, many imaging findings, such as in immune-related pneumonitis, are nonspecific. Thus, accurate diagnosis may be delayed underling the importance for adequate imaging features characterization in the appropriate clinical setting in order to provide timely and efficient patient management. ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT and radiomics have demonstrated to reliably detect these toxicities and potentially have predictive value for identifying patients at risk of developing irAEs. The purpose of this article is to provide a review of the main immunotherapy-related toxicities and discuss their characteristics on imaging.

Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging during immunomodulatory treatments in patients with solid tumors version 1.0

PURPOSE

The goal of this guideline/procedure standard is to assist nuclear medicine physicians, other nuclear medicine professionals, oncologists or other medical specialists for recommended use of [18F]FDG PET/CT in oncological patients undergoing immunotherapy, with special focus on response assessment in solid tumors.

METHODS

In a cooperative effort between the EANM, the SNMMI and the ANZSNM, clinical indications, recommended imaging procedures and reporting standards have been agreed upon and summarized in this joint guideline/procedure standard.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of immuno-oncology is rapidly evolving, and this guideline/procedure standard should not be seen as definitive, but rather as a guidance document standardizing the use and interpretation of [18F]FDG PET/CT during immunotherapy. Local variations to this guideline should be taken into consideration.

PREAMBLE

The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association founded in 1985 to facilitate worldwide communication among individuals pursuing clinical and academic excellence in nuclear medicine. The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote science, technology and practical application of nuclear medicine. The Australian and New Zealand Society of Nuclear Medicine (ANZSNM), founded in 1969, represents the major professional society fostering the technical and professional development of nuclear medicine practice across Australia and New Zealand. It promotes excellence in the nuclear medicine profession through education, research and a commitment to the highest professional standards. EANM, SNMMI and ANZSNM members are physicians, technologists, physicists and scientists specialized in the research and clinical practice of nuclear medicine. All three societies will periodically put forth new standards/guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and improve service to patients. Existing standards/guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each standard/guideline, representing a policy statement by the EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM, has undergone a thorough consensus process, entailing extensive review. These societies recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires particular training and skills, as described in each document. These standards/guidelines are educational tools designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate and effective nuclear medicine care for patients. These guidelines are consensus documents based on current knowledge. They are not intended to be inflexible rules or requirements of practice, nor should they be used to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the EANM, SNMMI and ANZSNM caution against the use of these standards/guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals considering the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that an action differing from what is laid out in the guidelines/procedure standards, standing alone, is below standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the standards/guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines/procedure standards. The practice of medicine involves not only the science, but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible for general guidelines to consistently allow for an accurate diagnosis to be reached or a particular treatment response to be predicted. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these standards/ guidelines will not ensure a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that practitioners follow a reasonable course of action, based on their level of training, current knowledge, clinical practice guidelines, available resources and the needs/context of the patient being treated. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective. The present guideline/procedure standard was developed collaboratively by the EANM, the SNMMI and the ANZSNM, with the support of international experts in the field. They summarize also the views of the Oncology and Theranostics and the Inflammation and Infection Committees of the EANM, as well as the procedure standards committee of the SNMMI, and reflect recommendations for which the EANM and SNMMI cannot be held responsible. The recommendations should be taken into the context of good practice of nuclear medicine and do not substitute for national and international legal or regulatory provisions.

Diagnostic impact of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging on the detection of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy is an effective treatment method for cancer cells with humoral and cellular immune mechanisms of action but triggers an inflammatory response and disrupts standard protective immune tolerance. Early detection of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) on PET/CT is crucial for patient management and subsequent therapy decisions. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT on detecting of irAEs in patients receiving immunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-six patients with advanced RCC (n: 32), malign melanoma (n: 9), lung cancer (n: 4), and laryngeal carcinoma (n: 1), who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging for response assessment after immunotherapy, were enrolled in the study. Newly detected findings associated with irAEs on posttreatment PET/CT images were compared with the pretreatment PET/CT, both qualitatively and semi-quantitatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight (61%) patients developed irAEs as observed on PET/CT. Enteritis/colitis was the most frequent irAE visualized on PET/CT with 13 patients (28.2%), followed by gastritis (17.3%), thyroiditis (13%), and myositis/arthritis (13%). Hepatitis (6.5%), pneumonitis (6.5%), sarcoid-like reaction (4.3%), and hypophysitis (4.3%) were observed to a lesser extent. The median time between the appearance of irAEs on PET/CT and the initiation of immunotherapy was 4.3 months. There were no significant differences in age, sex, and treatment response status of patients with and without irAEs.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT plays a fundamental role in cancer immunotherapy with the potential to show significant irAEs both in the diagnosis and in follow-up of irAEs. IrAEs were present on PET/CT images of more than half of the patients who received immunotherapy in our study.

PET/CT variants and pitfalls in malignant melanoma

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT plays an increasingly pivotal role in the staging and post-treatment monitoring of high-risk melanoma patients, augmented by the introduction of therapies, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), that have novel modes of action that challenge conventional response assessment. Simultaneously, technological advances have been regularly released, including advanced reconstruction algorithms, digital PET and motion correction, which have allowed the PET community to detect ever-smaller cancer lesions, improving diagnostic performance in the context of indications previously viewed as limitations, such as detection of in-transit disease and confirmation of the nature of small pulmonary metastases apparent on CT.This review will provide advice regarding melanoma-related PET protocols and will focus on variants encountered during the imaging of melanoma patients. Emphasis will be made on pitfalls related to non-malignant diseases and treatment-related findings that may confound accurate interpretation unless recognized. The latter include signs of immune activation and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Technology-related pitfalls are also discussed, since while new PET technologies improve detection of small lesions, these may also induce false-positive cases and require a learning curve to be observed. In these times of the COVID 19 pandemic, cases illustrating lessons learned from COVID 19 or vaccination-related pitfalls will also be described.

NSCLC Biomarkers to Predict Response to Immunotherapy with Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI): From the Cells to In Vivo Images

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related death, and it is usually diagnosed in advanced stages (stage III or IV). Recently, the availability of targeted strategies and of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has favorably changed patient prognosis. Treatment outcome is closely related to tumor biology and interaction with the tumor immune microenvironment (TME). While the response in molecular targeted therapies relies on the presence of specific genetic alterations in tumor cells, accurate ICI biomarkers of response are lacking, and clinical outcome likely depends on multiple factors that are both host and tumor-related. This paper is an overview of the ongoing research on predictive factors both from in vitro/ex vivo analysis (ranging from conventional pathology to molecular biology) and in vivo analysis, where molecular imaging is showing an exponential growth and use due to technological advancements and to the new bioinformatics approaches applied to image analyses that allow the recovery of specific features in specific tumor subclones.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor related adverse effects and FDG PET/CT findings

Immune check-point inhibitor (ICI) treatments activate the T-cells against tumor. Activated T-cells not only attack the tumor but also healthy cells, causing an autoimmune reaction in various tissues. These immune related adverse effects (IRAE) cause ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake in various tissues due to inflammation. It is important to recognize and report these findings on FDG Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) studies. FDG PET helps to determine the presence, location and severity of IRAEs. In severe cases, ICI treatments are interrupted or suspended and anti-inflammatory treatments are started. FDG uptake due IRAEs may mimic metastases or disease progression. Their presence may also help predicting response to treatment and have prognostic implications. In this review article, we will provide basic information about ICI treatments, IRAEs and FDG PET/CT findings.

18F-FDG PET/CT versus Diagnostic Contrast-Enhanced CT for Follow-Up of Stage IV Melanoma Patients Treated by Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Frequency and Management of Discordances over a 3-Year Period in a University Hospital

Aim: To perform a comprehensive analysis of discordances between contrast-enhanced CT (ceCT) and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of the extra-cerebral treatment monitoring in patients with stage IV melanoma. Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study over a 3-year period in patients referred for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ceCT in the framework of therapy monitoring of immune checkpoint (ICIs) as of January 2017. Imaging reports were analyzed by two physicians in consensus. The anatomical site responsible for discordances, as well as induced changes in treatment were noted. Results: Eighty patients were included and 195 pairs of scans analyzed. Overall, discordances occurred in 65 cases (33%). Eighty percent of the discordances (52/65) were due to ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans upstaging the patient. Amongst these discordances, 17/52 (33%) led to change in patient’s management, the most frequent being radiotherapy of a progressing site. ceCT represented 13/65 (20%) of discordances and induced changes in patients’ management in 2/13 cases (15%). The most frequent anatomical site involved was subcutaneous for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT findings and lung or liver for ceCT. Conclusions: Treatment monitoring with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is more efficient than ceCT and has a greater impact in patient’s management.

Immunotherapy, cancer and PET

The treatment of cancer by immunotherapy has been a revolution, as it is the first strategy that manages to control the disease for prolonged periods of time. Its efficacy is associated with different imaging response patterns and the appearance of new toxicities. We would highlight two patterns of tumour response: pseudoprogression, or growth of tumour lesions after the start of immunotherapy treatment, followed by a significant reduction in lesions, and hyperprogression, acceleration of tumour progression and metastasis early after the start of treatment. The emergence of such patterns has generated new metabolic response criteria, such as PECRIT, PERCIMT, imPERCIST and IPERCIST. Of particular interest are the new immunoPET-specific biomarkers, as they allow the identification of patients presenting the tumour target and are useful for predicting response to immunotherapy.

Assessing immune organs on 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for therapy monitoring of immune checkpoint inhibitors: inter-observer variability, prognostic value and evolution during the treatment course of melanoma patients

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have significantly improved survival in advanced melanoma. There is a need for robust biomarkers to identify patients who do not respond. We analysed 14 baseline ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) metrics and their evolution to assess their correlation with patient outcome, compared with 7 established biological markers and 7 clinical variables.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective monocentric observational study of 29 patients with advanced melanoma who underwent baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, followed by an early monitoring PET/CT (iPET) scan after 1 month of treatment and follow-up studies at 3rd (M3PET) and 6th month (M6PET). ¹⁸F-FDG uptake in immune organs (spleen, bone marrow, ileocecal valve) and derived spleen-to-liver (SLR) and bone-to-liver (BLR) ratios were reviewed by two PET readers for reproducibility analysis purposes including 14 PET variables. The most reproducible indexes were used for evaluation as predictors of overall survival (OS) in comparison with PET response using imPERCIST5, whole-body metabolic active tumour volume (WB-MATV) and biological parameters (lactate dehydrogenases (LDH), reactive protein c (CRP), white blood count (WBC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived neutrophils to lymphocyte ratio).

RESULTS

Strong reproducibility's (intraclass coefficients of correlation (ICC) > 0.90) were observed for spleen anterior SUV_peak, spleen MV, spleen TLG, spleen length and BLR_mean. ICC for SLR_mean and ileocecal SUV_mean were 0.86 and 0.65, respectively. In the 1-year OS 1 group, SLR_mean tended to increase at each time point to reach a significant difference at M6-PET (p = 0.019). The same trends were observed with spleen SUV_peak anterior and spleen length. In the 1-year OS 0 group, a significative increase of spleen length was found at iPET, as compared with baseline PET (p = 0.014) and M3-PET (p = 0.0239). Univariable Kaplan-Meier survival analysis found that i%var spleen length, M3%var SLR_mean, baseline LDH, i%var NLR and response at M6PET were all predictors of 1-year OS.

CONCLUSIONS

SLR_mean is recommended as a prognosticator in melanoma patients under immunotherapy: its increase greater than 25% at 3 months, compared with baseline, was associated with poor outcome after ICIs.

Reassessing Patterns of Response to Immunotherapy with PET: From Morphology to Metabolism

Cancer demands precise evaluation and accurate and timely assessment of response to treatment. Imaging must be performed early during therapy to allow adjustments to the course of treatment. For decades, cross-sectional imaging provided these answers, showing responses to the treatment through changes in tumor size. However, with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors, complex immune response patterns were revealed that have quickly highlighted the limitations of this approach. Patterns of response beyond tumor size have been recognized and include cystic degeneration, necrosis, hemorrhage, and cavitation. Furthermore, new unique patterns of response have surfaced, like pseudoprogression and hyperprogression, while other patterns were shown to be deceptive, such as unconfirmed progressive disease. This evolution led to new therapeutic evaluation criteria adapted specifically for immunotherapy. Moreover, inflammatory adverse effects of the immune checkpoint blockade were identified, many of which were life threatening and requiring prompt intervention. Given complex concepts like tumor microenvironment and novel therapeutic modalities in the era of personalized medicine, increasingly sophisticated imaging techniques are required to address the intricate patterns of behavior of different neoplasms. Fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT has rapidly emerged as one such technique that spans both molecular biology and immunology. This imaging technique is potentially capable of identifying and tracking prognostic biomarkers owing to its combined use of anatomic and metabolic imaging, which enables it to characterize biologic processes in vivo. This tailored approach may provide whole-body quantification of the metabolic burden of disease, providing enhanced prediction of treatment response and improved detection of adverse events. ^©RSNA, 2020.

Assessing Immunotherapy with Functional and Molecular Imaging and Radiomics

Immunotherapy is changing the treatment paradigm for cancer and has introduced new challenges in medical imaging. Because not all patients benefit from immunotherapy, pretreatment imaging should be performed to identify not only prognostic factors but also factors that allow prediction of response to immunotherapy. Follow-up studies must allow detection of nonresponders, without confusion of pseudoprogression with real progression to prevent premature discontinuation of treatment that can benefit the patient. Conventional imaging techniques and classic tumor response criteria are limited for the evaluation of the unusual patterns of response that arise from the specific mechanisms of action of immunotherapy, so advanced imaging methods must be developed to overcome these shortcomings. The authors present the fundamentals of the tumor immune microenvironment and immunotherapy and how they influence imaging findings. They also discuss advances in functional and molecular imaging techniques for the assessment of immunotherapy in clinical practice, including their use to characterize immune phenotypes, assess patient prognosis and response to therapy, and evaluate immune-related adverse events. Finally, the development of radiomics and radiogenomics in these therapies and the future role of imaging biomarkers for immunotherapy are discussed. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2020.

The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting or monitoring immunotherapy response in patients with metastatic melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the ability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT to assess the response of patients with metastatic melanoma to immunotherapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature for studies examining the prognostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in monitoring the response of patients with metastatic melanoma to immunotherapy was performed. We also screened the references of the selected articles to identify any other relevant studies. Detailed data were extracted and categorized. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used for analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty four eligible articles were included in the systematic review. Based on the baseline ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging, the pooled hazard ratios of MTV, SLR, SUV/SULmax, SUV/SULpeak, and TLG for overall survival (OS) were 1.777 (95%CI: 1.389-2.275, p < 0.001), 3.425 (95%CI: 1.707-6.869, p = 0.001), 0.941 (95%CI: 0.599-1.477, p = 0.791), 1.704 (95%CI: 1.253-2.316, p = 0.016), and 1.755 (95%CI: 1.315-2.342, p < 0.001), respectively. The conventional and modified response assessment criteria exhibited a pooled sensitivity of 64% (95%CI: 46-79%) and 94% (95%CI: 81-99%) and a pooled specificity of 80% (95%CI: 59-93%) and 84% (95%CI: 64-95%), respectively, for the early ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan. On the other hand, based on the late ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scan, the pooled sensitivity of 67% (95%CI: 35-90%) and 92% (95%CI: 73-99%) and pooled specificity of 77% (95%CI: 56-91%) and 76% (95%CI: 50-93%) were observed for the conventional and modified criteria, respectively. PET-detectable immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were associated with the response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline SUVpeak, MTV, and TLG parameters represent promising predictors of the final response of metastatic melanoma patients to immunotherapy. Modified response assessment criteria are potentially an appropriate method for monitoring immunotherapy. irAEs are also valuable for predicting eventual clinical benefit of treatment.

A multidisciplinary consensus on the morphological and functional responses to immunotherapy treatment

The implementation of immunotherapy has radically changed the treatment of oncological patients. Currently, immunotherapy is indicated in the treatment of patients with head and neck tumors, melanoma, lung cancer, bladder tumors, colon cancer, cervical cancer, breast cancer, Merkel cell carcinoma, liver cancer, leukemia and lymphomas. However, its efficacy is restricted to a limited number of cases. The challenge is, therefore, to identify which subset of patients would benefit from immunotherapy. To this end, the establishment of immunotherapy response criteria and predictive and prognostic biomarkers is of paramount interest. In this report, a group of experts of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM), and Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SEMNIM) provide an up-to-date review and a consensus guide on these issues.