Immunotherapy, cancer and PET

The treatment of cancer by immunotherapy has been a revolution, as it is the first strategy that manages to control the disease for prolonged periods of time. Its efficacy is associated with different imaging response patterns and the appearance of new toxicities. We would highlight two patterns of tumour response: pseudoprogression, or growth of tumour lesions after the start of immunotherapy treatment, followed by a significant reduction in lesions, and hyperprogression, acceleration of tumour progression and metastasis early after the start of treatment. The emergence of such patterns has generated new metabolic response criteria, such as PECRIT, PERCIMT, imPERCIST and IPERCIST. Of particular interest are the new immunoPET-specific biomarkers, as they allow the identification of patients presenting the tumour target and are useful for predicting response to immunotherapy.

Qualitative and quantitative performance of ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/MRI versus ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

MR imaging and PET/CT are integrated in the work-up of head and neck cancer patients. The hybrid imaging technology (18)F-FDG-PET/MR imaging combining morphological and functional information might be attractive in this patient population. The aim of the study was to compare whole-body (18)F-FDG-PET/MR imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer, both qualitatively in terms of lymph node and distant metastases detection and quantitatively in terms of standardized uptake values measured in (18)F-FDG-avid lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with head and neck cancer underwent both whole-body PET/CT and PET/MR imaging after a single injection of (18)F-FDG. Two groups of readers counted the number of lesions on PET/CT and PET/MR imaging scans. A consensus reading was performed in those cases in which the groups disagreed. Quantitative standardized uptake value measurements were performed by placing spheric ROIs over the lesions in 3 different planes. Weighted and unweighted κ statistics, correlation analysis, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

κ statistics for the number of head and neck lesion lesions counted (pooled across regions) revealed interreader agreement between groups 1 and 2 of 0.47 and 0.56, respectively. Intrareader agreement was 0.67 and 0.63. The consensus reading provided an intrareader agreement of 0.63. For the presence or absence of metastasis, interreader agreement was 0.85 and 0.70. The consensus reading provided an intrareader agreement of 0.72. The correlations between the maximum standardized uptake value in (18)F-FDG-PET/MR imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT for primary tumors and lymph node and metastatic lesions were very high (Spearman r = 1.00, 0.93, and 0.92, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with head and neck cancer, (18)F-FDG-PET/MR imaging and (18)F-FDG-PET/CT provide comparable results in the detection of lymph node and distant metastases. Standardized uptake values derived from (18)F-FDG-PET/MR imaging can be used reliably in this patient population.

Recurrent and metastatic breast cancer PET, PET/CT, PET/MRI: FDG and new biomarkers

Primary breast cancer often displays only moderately increased glucose metabolism resulting in a low sensitivity of positron emission tomography (PET) using [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in detecting small breast carcinomas, locoregional micrometastases and non-enlarged tumor infiltrated lymphnodes. In contrast, distant breast cancer metastases are generally characterized by significantly increased metabolic activity compared to normal tissue. Therefore, FDG-PET provides accurate diagnostic information as a whole body imaging modality in staging of breast cancer patients. The metabolic information from FDG-PET/CT is often more sensitive than conventional imaging for the detection of distant metastases, particularly in the recurrent setting. FDG-PET is superior in detecting tumor-involved distant lymphnodes, particularly those which are normal in size, as well as in characterizing enlarged lymphnodes as positive or negative for malignancy. Of note, CT is superior in detecting small lung metastases. Although the overall sensitivity for bone scintigraphy and FDG-PET are comparable, bone scintigraphy seems to be superior in the detection of osteoblastic disease whereas FDG-PET is superior for osteolytic metastases, suggesting a complementary role for both imaging procedures. FDG-PET/MR has an evolving role in breast cancer management, for example in the detection of liver metastases and in the research setting for treatment monitoring. The utilization of PET for prediction of treatment response to primary chemotherapy is an area of active research, using FDG as well as other PET biomarkers including [F-18]Fluoroestradiol, [F-18]Fluorothymidine and integrin targeting tracer for monitoring anti-angiogenic therapy.