Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: Impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement

Mobile chest imaging of neonates in incubators: Optimising DR and CR acquisitions

INTRODUCTION

Neonates are a particularly vulnerable patient group with complex medical needs requiring frequent radiographic examinations. This study aims to compare computed radiography (CR) and direct digital radiography (DDR) portable imaging systems used to acquire chest x-rays for neonates within incubators.

METHODS

An anthropomorphic neonatal chest phantom was imaged under controlled conditions using one portable machine but captured using both CR and DDR technology. Other variables explored were: image receptor position (direct and incubator tray), tube current and kV. All other parameters were kept consistent. Contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was measured using ImageJ software and dose-area-product (DAP) was recorded. Optimisation score was calculated by dividing CNR with the DAP for each image acquisition.

RESULTS

The images with the highest CNR were those acquired using DDR direct exposures and the images with lowest CNR were those acquired using CR with the image receptor placed within the incubator tray. This is also supported by the optimisation scores which demonstrated DDR direct produced the optimal combination with regards to CNR and radiation dose. The CNR had a mean increase of 50.3% when comparing DDR direct with CR direct respectively. This was also evident when comparing DDR and CR for in-tray acquisitions, with CNR increasing by a mean of 43.5%. A mean increase of 20.4% was seen in CNR when comparing DDR tray exposures to CR direct.

CONCLUSION

DDR direct produced images of highest CNR, with incubator tray reducing CNR for both CR and DDR. However, DDR tray still had better image quality compared to CR direct.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Where possible, DDR should be the imaging system of choice for portable examinations on neonates owing to its superior image quality at lower radiation dose.

Development of Quality-Controlled Low-Dose Protocols for Radiography in the Neonatal ICU Using a New Mobile Digital Radiography System

OBJECTIVE. The aim of this study was to develop a low-dose radiography protocol for the neonatal ICU (NICU) using a new mobile digital radiography system with advanced denoising image processing and to evaluate the noninferiority of that protocol. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. In this prospective randomized study, 40 neonates in the NICU underwent radiography of the thorax and abdomen with two different mobile radiography units: conventional technique on one unit (50 kV, 1.6 mAs, and no additional filtration) and a new technique on another unit (54 kV, 0.1-mm Cu filtration). Three low-dose protocols for the second unit were developed in a phantom study: protocol A (100% equivalent dose with conventional protocol), protocol B (80% equivalent dose), and protocol C (64% equivalent dose). The noninferiority of each low-dose protocol was assessed by three independent readers using image quality criteria. RESULTS. Forty patients each underwent three pairs of radiography examinations (protocol A and the conventional protocol, protocol B and the conventional protocol, and protocol C and the conventional protocol), except one pair that did not include one image of the conventional protocol. The interrater reliability among the three readers was 0.91 (p < 0.001). Both of the low-dose protocols (B and C) were statistically noninferior to the conventional protocol with respect to overall image quality. Protocol B better depicted almost all anatomic landmarks and had better overall image quality than the conventional protocol. CONCLUSION. Using appropriate technique and acquisition factors, radiation dose can be lowered on a digital radiography system without significant effect on the image quality by adding filtrations and a new denoising technique.

Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study

Mobile radiography systems are commonly used in the intensive care unit. The use of a physical antiscatter grid with these systems is uncommon because of drawbacks. In 2015, Virtual Grid (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) became available for chest and abdomen examinations. In this study, we compared image quality (IQ) with a contrast-detail phantom (CDRAD 2.0; Artinis Medical Systems, Zetten, the Netherlands) of digital radiographs acquired without any grid (gridless) with those corrected for scatter by either software (SW)-based scatter correction (Virtual Grid) or a physical grid (grid). Furthermore, we determined the optimal Virtual Grid settings that lead to the best contrast-detail IQ score (inverse IQ figure).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images were obtained with a cassette spot film device with an inserted portable flat-panel detector (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). The CDRAD phantom was sandwiched between polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) with total thicknesses of 12, 16, 21, and 26 cm to simulate patient attenuation and scatter. Tube voltages of 81, 90, 109, and 125 kVp were used to make the radiographs. In total, 12 different Virtual Grid settings (grid ratio, line pairs (lp)/cm, and type of interstitial material) were applied for every phantom thickness and tube voltage.

RESULTS

An average increase of 32% in IQ was obtained when Virtual Grid images with a SW grid ratio 10:1 were compared with gridless images (P < 0.001). Increasing the SW grid ratio to 20:1 resulted in a further increased IQ. With a phantom thickness of 12 cm PMMA, Virtual Grid outperformed the removable physical grid presented in the cassette spot film device. The linear mixed-effects model showed that IQ is mainly affected by PMMA, tube voltage, and the SW grid ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual Grid improves images obtained without physical grid for a wide range of experimental conditions. Despite the different possible settings of the Virtual Grid SW, the most important parameter affecting IQ is the SW grid ratio.

Improved visualization of peripherally inserted central catheters on chest radiographs of neonates using fractional multiscale image processing

BACKGROUND

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) provide secure intravenous access for the delivery of life-sustaining medications and nutrition. They are commonly used in pediatrics. Confirmation of correct central catheter tip position is crucial. Verification is usually done by a radiograph. The aim of this study is to evaluate the ability of Fractional Multiscale image Processing (FMP) to detect PICC tips on the digital chest radiographs of neonates.

METHODS

A total of 94 radiographs of 47 patients were included in the study. 29 patients were male, 18 were female. The mean age of all examined children was 9.2 days (range 0-99 days). In total, six readers (two radiologists, two residents in radiology, one last year medical student, one neonatologist) evaluated 94 unprocessed and catheter-enhanced radiographs using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor catheter tip visualization, 5 = excellent catheter tip visualization). Additionally, the two radiologists evaluated the diagnostic confidence for chest pathologies using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor diagnostic confidence, 5 = excellent diagnostic confidence). Radiographs were evaluated on a dedicated workstation.

RESULTS

In all cases, the catheter-enhanced radiograph rated higher than (n = 471), or equal (n = 93) to, the unprocessed radiograph when visualizing catheter tips. 87% of the catheter-enhanced radiographs obtained a rating of 4 or higher, while only 42% of unprocessed radiographs received 4 or more points. Regarding diagnostic confidence for chest pathologies one radiologist rated two catheter-enhanced radiographs higher than the unprocessed radiographs, while all other 186 evaluations rated the catheter-enhanced radiographs equal to (n = 78) or lower than (n = 108) the unprocessed radiographs. Only 60% of the catheter-enhanced radiographs yielded a diagnostic confidence of 4 or higher, while 90% of the unprocessed images received 4 or more points.

CONCLUSION

Catheter-enhanced digital chest radiographs demonstrate improved visualization of low contrast PICC tips in neonates compared to unprocessed radiographs. Furthermore, they enable detection of accompanying chest pathologies. However, definitive diagnosis of chest pathologies should be made on unprocessed radiographs.

Development of mobile intraoperative computed tomography imaging system and assessment of its performance in a brain and body phantom study

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) system has been developed focusing on combining the advanced imaging techniques for the best imaging modality. However, the use of iCT system in the operating rooms is limited due to the lack of flexible mobility.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop a mobile iCT imaging system and assess its imaging performance in a phantom study.

METHODS

The mobile iCT system with mecanum omni-directional wheels has three major components namely, a rotating gantry, a slip-ring and a stationary gantry. Performance of mecanum iCT system was evaluated using the indices of signal-to-noise (SNR), contrast-to noise (CNR), and spatial resolution (MTF). Anatomical landmarks on phantom images were assessed using a 5-point scale (5 = definitely seen; 4 = probably seen; 3 = equivocal; 2 = probably not seen; and 1 = definitely not seen).

RESULTS

The mecanum iCT system can be conveniently used for a whole-body scan under intraoperative conditions even in narrow operating rooms due to a smaller turning radius. The image quality of the mecanum iCT system was found to be acceptable for clinical applications (with SNR = 162.72, CNR = 134.29 and MTF = 694 μm). The diagnostic scores on the phantom images were 'definitely seen' value.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed mecanum iCT system achieved the improved flexible mobility and has potential to better serve as a useful imaging tool in the clinical intraoperative setting.

Bedside Chest Radiographs in the Intensive care Setting: Wireless Direct Radiography Compared to Computed Radiography

OBJECTIVES

To compare image quality, visibility of anatomic landmarks, tubes and lines, and other clinically significant findings on portable (bedside) chest radiographs acquired with wireless direct radiography (DRw) and computed radiography (CR).

METHODS

In a prospective IRB-approved and HIPAA-compliant study, portable DRw (DRX-1C mobile retrofit portable wireless direct radiography, CareStream Inc., Rochester, NY) and portable CR (AGFA CR (DXG) version; NIM2103, AGFA Healthcare, Ridgefield Park, NJ) images of the chest were acquired within 24-hours in 80 patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Image pairs of 75 patients (37% female) with a mean age of 60.7±16 years were independently compared side-by-side by 7 experienced thoracic radiologists using a five-point scale. When tubes and lines were present, the radiologist also compared an edge-enhanced copy of the DRw image to the CR image.

RESULTS

Most radiologists found significantly fewer artifacts on DRw images compared to CR images and all readers agreed that when present, these artifacts did not significantly preclude the ability to evaluate anatomic landmarks, tubes and lines, or clinically significant findings. None of the radiologists (0/7) reported superior visibility of anatomic structures on CR images compared to DRw images and some radiologists (3/7) found DRw images significantly better for visibility of anatomic landmarks such as the carina (p=0.01-0.001). Most radiologists (6/7) found DRw images to be better or clearly better than CR images for position of tubes and lines, and edge-enhanced DRw images to be especially helpful for evaluation of central venous catheters and esophageal tubes (p=0.027-0.001). None of the radiologists deemed CR images superior for visibility of clinically significant findings.

CONCLUSIONS

Critical care chest radiography with a portable DRw system can provide similar or superior information compared to a CR system regarding clinically significant findings and position of tubes and lines.

Key Performance Indicators for Comparing the Performance of Portable Radiography: Direct Digital Radiography versus Conventional Machine Computed Radiography-A Study in a Nonacute Hospital

INTRODUCTION

Portable radiography traditionally has been performed with a conventional portable x-ray unit with computed radiography (CR) system (conventional-CR combo), and off-site processing of the exposed CR cassettes was time-consuming. The direct digital radiography (DDR) portable x-ray system, with the digital image immediately available for review and wireless transmission as the key merits, is newly installed for portable radiography. Thus, the work flow of portable radiography is changed. This study was performed to quantitatively investigate the performance of portable radiography using the DDR portable x-ray system and conventional-CR combo in terms of efficiency and work flow enhancement.

METHODS

One hundred ninety portable x-ray examinations were timed for each procedural step using conventional-CR combo (n=97) and the DDR portable x-ray system. The following key performance indicators were designed for measuring the performance of portable radiography quantitatively: "examination duration," "time for image becoming available in PACS," "postacquisition processing time," and "manpower deployment time."

RESULTS

Productivity was raised by 96% using the DDR portable x-ray system. "Examination duration" using the DDR portable system was significantly faster (P < .0001), with a mean calculated time of 13.4 ± 7.6 minutes for the DDR portable system and 25.2 ± 10.9 minutes for conventional-CR combo. The "time for image becoming available in PACS" was significantly shorter than that of conventional-CR combo (P < .0001), with a mean time of 6.8 ± 2.6 minutes for the DDR portable system and 19.2 ± 9.7 minutes for conventional-CR combo. The "postacquisition processing time" was measured with slight differences, with a mean time of 2.2 ± 1.1 minutes for the DDR portable system and 1.9 ± 1.0 minutes for conventional-CR combo (P = .1064). Because more portable x-ray examinations could be performed when using the DDR portable x-ray system in each round of service, the mean "manpower deployment time" when using the DDR portable x-ray system was longer (ie, 82.6 ± 46.8 minutes for the DDR portable system and 24.5 ± 11.9 minutes for conventional-CR combo).

CONCLUSIONS

By using the new DDR portable x-ray system with work flow changes, the performance of portable radiography was improved in efficiency and work flow was enhanced. Furthermore, the four defined key performance indicators in this study may help provide a framework for measuring the performance of portable radiography in other institutions.

[Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography: a contradiction?]

CLINICAL/METHODICAL ISSUE

Dose reduction and adequate image quality in digital radiography - a contradiction?

STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL METHODS

Digital radiography has already replaced traditional screen-film systems.

METHODICAL INNOVATIONS

Substantial improvements in both dose efficiency and spatial resolution demonstrate the rapid developments in digital radiography.

PERFORMANCE

Needle-detector systems have shown up to a 50% dose reduction compared to traditional screen-film systems. There is also a dose reduction capability of up to 50% comparing direct radiography (DR) systems to computed radiography (CR) systems for chest X-rays. However, despite the most recent achievements of CR technology, the dose efficiency of DR systems (caesium iodide flat-panel detector) is unparalleled.

ACHIEVEMENTS

The progress in detector technology has contributed to dose reduction and improved image quality, while saving time and providing a higher examination rate.

PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS

The use of dose indicators and longitudinal dose control are important to avoid substantial accidental dose increase. The dose applied to patients should fall markedly below the defined diagnostic reference levels within the European Union. Regular quality control, as well as continuous education and training of medical and technical personnel, contribute to ensure that the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) principle is consistently followed.