Health service cost associated with percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with spinal metastases

Multilevel percutaneous kyphoplasty in painful osteolytic vertebral metastases: a study of the efficacy and safety

Purpose: The spine is the most common skeletal site for metastatic tumors. In the treatment of vertebral metastases, the absolutely safe number of levels that can be treated via percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) during one procedure remains controversial. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of multilevel (>3) PKP for painful osteolytic vertebral metastases.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 176 patients who received PKP for painful osteolytic spinal metastases. Group A (n=104) received PKP at a maximum of three vertebral levels per procedure, while group B (n=72) received PKP at more than three levels during one operation. Surgical efficacy was assessed via a comparison of the VAS, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and general health (GH) and mental health (MH) scores of the Short Form-36 Health Survey before and after PKP. The complications were observed to evaluate the safety.

Results: Both groups had significantly improved VAS, ODI, GH and MH scores after PKP (P<0.05). One week after surgery, group A had significantly less pain (VAS 3.41±0.1) than group B (VAS 3.74±0.13) (P<0.05). At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, the GH score was more significantly improved in group A than group B (P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the ODI, MH score, and complications (P>0.05).

Conclusion: Multilevel PKP is safe and results in effective pain relief, and improvement of spinal mobility and GH in patients with osteolytic vertebral metastases. However, patients who undergo PKP at more than three levels have slightly worse short-term pain relief (less than 1 week postoperatively) and improvement of GH in the long-term (more than 3 months postoperatively) compared with patients who undergo PKP at less than three levels.

Postoperative Functional Evaluation of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Compared With Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Vertebral Compression Fractures

Both percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) have shown their superiorities in the treatment of vertebral compression fractures (VCFs), yet, few studies have compared their postoperative functional outcomes in patients with VCFs; the authors therefore conducted this meta-analysis to explore the postoperative functional recovery efficacies of PVP and PKP in the treatment of VCFs. Computerized bibliographic databases were applied to identify relevant articles comparing the therapeutic effect of PVP and PKP in the treatment of VCFs. Standardized mean difference and its 95% confidence interval were calculated. Statistical analyses were conducted with the STATA statistical software. Postoperative Oswestry Disability Index investigation outcomes revealed a significant difference between the PVP group and PKP group. Subgroup analysis by the 8 dimensions of the SF-36 health survey presented a statistical significance in general health between the PVP group and PKP group. The application of PKP has the superiority in postoperative functional recovery of VCFs as compared with PVP, especially in efficaciously extending kyphosis angle, improving vertebral body height and decreasing complication rate.

Costs and readmission rates for the resection of primary and metastatic spinal tumors: a comparative analysis of 181 patients

OBJECTIVE

Because the surgical strategies for primary and metastatic spinal tumors are different, the respective associated costs and morbidities associated with those treatments likely vary. This study compares the direct costs and 90-day readmission rates between the resection of extradural metastatic and primary spinal tumors. The factors associated with cost and readmission are identified.

METHODS

Adults (age 18 years or older) who underwent the resection of spinal tumors between 2008 and 2013 were included in the study. Patients with intradural tumors were excluded. The direct costs of index hospitalization and 90-day readmission hospitalization were evaluated. The direct costs were compared between patients who were treated surgically for primary and metastatic spinal tumors. The independent factors associated with costs and readmissions were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 181 patients with spinal tumors were included (63 primary and 118 metastatic tumors). Overall, the mean index hospital admission cost for the surgical management of spinal tumors was $52,083. There was no significant difference in the cost of hospitalization between primary ($55,801) and metastatic ($50,098) tumors (p = 0.426). The independent factors associated with higher cost were male sex (p = 0.032), preoperative inability to ambulate (p = 0.002), having more than 3 comorbidities (p = 0.037), undergoing corpectomy (p = 0.021), instrumentation greater than 7 levels (p < 0.001), combined anterior-posterior approach (p < 0.001), presence of a perioperative complication (p < 0.001), and longer hospital stay (p < 0.001). The perioperative complication rate was 21.0%. Of this cohort, 11.6% of patients were readmitted within 90 days, and the mean hospitalization cost of that readmission was $20,078. Readmission rates after surgical treatment for primary and metastatic tumors were similar (11.1% vs 11.9%, respectively) (p = 0.880). Prior hospital stay greater than 15 days (OR 6.62, p = 0.016) and diagnosis of lung metastasis (OR 52.99, p = 0.007) were independent predictors of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary and metastatic spinal tumors are comparable with regard to the direct costs of the index surgical hospitalization and readmission rate within 90 days. The factors independently associated with costs are related to preoperative health status, type and complexity of surgery, and postoperative course.

A Systematic Review of the Level of Evidence in Economic Evaluations of Medical Devices: The Example of Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty

CONTEXT

Economic evaluations are far less frequently reported for medical devices than for drugs. In addition, little is known about the quality of existing economic evaluations, particularly for innovative devices, such as those used in vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the level of evidence provided by the available economic evaluations for vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

DATA SOURCES

A systematic review of articles in English or French listed in the MEDLINE, PASCAL, COCHRANE and National Health Service Economic Evaluation databases, with limits on publication date (up to the date of the review, March 2014).

STUDY SELECTION

We included only economic evaluations of vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Editorial and methodological articles were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted from articles by two authors working independently and using two analysis grids to measure the quality of economic evaluations.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Twenty-one studies met our inclusion criteria. All were published between 2008 and 2014. Eighteen (86%) were full economic evaluations. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was the most frequent type of economic evaluation, and was present in 11 (52%) studies. Only three CEAs complied fully with the British Medical Journal checklist. The quality of the data sources used in the 21 studies was high, but the CEAs conforming to methodological guidelines did not use high-quality data sources for all components of the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review shows that the level of evidence in economic evaluations of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty is low, despite the recent publication of a large number of studies. This finding highlights the challenges to be faced to improve the quality of economic evaluations of medical devices.

Healthcare costs attributable to the treatment of patients with spinal metastases: a cohort study with up to 8 years follow-up

Background

Cancer treatment, and in particular end-of-life treatment, is associated with substantial healthcare costs. The purpose of this study was to analyse healthcare costs attributable to the treatment of patients with spinal metastases.

Methods

The study population (n = 629) was identified from clinical databases in Denmark. Patients undergoing spinal metastasis treatment from January 2005 through June 2012 were included. Clinical data were merged with national register data on healthcare resource use, costs and death date. The analytic period ranged from treatment initiation until death or administrative censoring in October 2013. Analysis of both survival and costs were stratified into four treatment regimens of increasing invasiveness: radiotherapy (T1), decompression (T2), decompression + instrumentation (T3) and decompression + instrumentation + reconstruction (T4). Survival was analysed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Costs were estimated from a healthcare perspective. Lifetime costs were defined as accumulated costs from treatment initiation until death. The Kaplan-Meier Sampling Average method was used to estimate these costs; 95% CIs were estimated using nonparametric bootstrapping.

Results

Mean age of the study population was 65.2 years (range: 19-95). During a mean follow-up period of 9.2 months (range: 0.1-94.5 months), post treatment survival ranged from 4.4 months (95% CI 2.5-7.5) in the T1 group to 8.7 months (95% CI 6.7-14.1) in the T4 group. Inpatient hospitalisation accounted for 65% and outpatient services for 31% of the healthcare costs followed by hospice placements 3% and primary care 1%. Lifetime healthcare costs accounted for €36,616 (95% CI 33,835-39,583) per T1 patients, €49,632 (95% CI 42,287-57,767) per T2 patient, €70997 (95% CI 62,244-82,354) per T3 patient and €87,814 (95% CI 76,638-101,528) per T4 patient. Overall, 45% of costs were utilised within the first month. T1 and T4 patients had almost identical distributions of costs: inpatient hospitalisation averaged 59% and 36% for outpatient services. Costs of T2 and T3 were very similarly distributed with an average of 71% for inpatient hospitalisation and 25% for outpatient services.

Conclusion

The index treatment accounts for almost half of lifetime health care costs from treatment initiation until death. As expected, lifetime healthcare costs are positively association with invasiveness of treatment.