Is simultaneous multisection turbo spin echo ready for clinical MRI? A feasibility study on fast imaging of knee lesions

Modern acceleration in musculoskeletal MRI: applications, implications, and challenges

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for accurately diagnosing a wide spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions due to its superior soft tissue contrast resolution. However, the long acquisition times of traditional two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) fast and turbo spin-echo (TSE) pulse sequences can limit patient access and comfort. Recent technical advancements have introduced acceleration techniques that significantly reduce MRI times for musculoskeletal examinations. Key acceleration methods include parallel imaging (PI), simultaneous multi-slice acquisition (SMS), and compressed sensing (CS), enabling up to eightfold faster scans while maintaining image quality, resolution, and safety standards. These innovations now allow for 3- to 6-fold accelerated clinical musculoskeletal MRI exams, reducing scan times to 4 to 6 min for joints and spine imaging. Evolving deep learning-based image reconstruction promises even faster scans without compromising quality. Current research indicates that combining acceleration techniques, deep learning image reconstruction, and superresolution algorithms will eventually facilitate tenfold accelerated musculoskeletal MRI in routine clinical practice. Such rapid MRI protocols can drastically reduce scan times by 80-90% compared to conventional methods. Implementing these rapid imaging protocols does impact workflow, indirect costs, and workload for MRI technologists and radiologists, which requires careful management. However, the shift from conventional to accelerated, deep learning-based MRI enhances the value of musculoskeletal MRI by improving patient access and comfort and promoting sustainable imaging practices. This article offers a comprehensive overview of the technical aspects, benefits, and challenges of modern accelerated musculoskeletal MRI, guiding radiologists and researchers in this evolving field.

Deep Learning MRI Reconstruction for Accelerating Turbo Spin Echo Hand and Wrist Imaging: A Comparison of Image Quality, Visualization of Anatomy, and Detection of Common Pathologies with Standard Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hand and wrist is a routine MRI examination and takes about 15-20 minutes, which can lead to problems resulting from the relatively long scan time, such as decreased image quality due to motion artifacts and lower patient throughput. The objective of this study was to evaluate a deep learning (DL) reconstruction for turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences of the hand and wrist regarding image quality, visualization of anatomy, and diagnostic performance concerning common pathologies.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients (mean age: 43 ± 19 [19-85] years, 10 men, 11 female) were prospectively enrolled in this study between October 2020 and June 2021. Each participant underwent two MRI protocols: first, standard fully sampled TSE sequences reconstructed with a standard GRAPPA reconstruction (TSES) and second, prospectively undersampled TSE sequences using a conventional parallel imaging undersampling pattern reconstructed with a DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Both protocols were acquired consecutively in one examination. Two experienced MSK-imaging radiologists qualitatively evaluated the images concerning image quality, noise, edge sharpness, artifacts, and diagnostic confidence, as well as the delineation of anatomical structures (triangular fibrocartilage complex, tendon of the extensor carpi ulnaris muscle, extrinsic and intrinsic ligaments, median nerve, cartilage) using a five-point Likert scale and assessed common pathologies. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and kappa statistics were performed to compare the sequences.

RESULTS

Overall image quality, artifacts, delineation of anatomical structures, and diagnostic confidence of TSEDL were rated to be comparable to TSES (p > 0.05). Additionally, TSEDL showed decreased image noise (4.90, median 5, IQR 5-5) compared to TSES (4.52, median 5, IQR 4-5, p < 0.05) and improved edge sharpness (TSEDL: 4.10, median 4, IQR 3.5-5; TSES: 3.57, median 4, IQR 3-4; p < 0.05). Inter- and intrareader agreement was substantial to almost perfect (κ = 0.632-1.000) for the detection of common pathologies. Time of acquisition could be reduced by more than 60% with the protocol using TSEDL.

CONCLUSION

Compared to TSES, TSEDL provided decreased noise and increased edge sharpness, equal image quality, delineation of anatomical structures, detection of pathologies, and diagnostic confidence. Therefore, TSEDL may be clinically relevant for hand and wrist imaging, as it reduces examination time by more than 60%, thus increasing patient comfort and patient throughput.

Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of Accelerated 2D Hip MRI with Deep Learning Reconstruction Based on a Deep Iterative Hierarchical Network

OBJECTIVES

Hip MRI using standard multiplanar sequences requires long scan times. Accelerating MRI is accompanied by reduced image quality. This study aimed to compare standard two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) sequences with accelerated 2D TSE sequences with deep learning (DL) reconstruction (TSEDL) for routine clinical hip MRI at 1.5 and 3 T in terms of feasibility, image quality, and diagnostic performance.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective, monocentric study, TSEDL was implemented clinically and evaluated in 14 prospectively enrolled patients undergoing a clinically indicated hip MRI at 1.5 and 3T between October 2020 and May 2021. Each patient underwent two examinations: For the first exam, we used standard sequences with generalized autocalibrating partial parallel acquisition reconstruction (TSES). For the second exam, we implemented prospectively undersampled TSE sequences with DL reconstruction (TSEDL). Two radiologists assessed the TSEDL and TSES regarding image quality, artifacts, noise, edge sharpness, diagnostic confidence, and delineation of anatomical structures using an ordinal five-point Likert scale (1 = non-diagnostic; 2 = poor; 3 = moderate; 4 = good; 5 = excellent). Both sequences were compared regarding the detection of common pathologies of the hip. Comparative analyses were conducted to assess the differences between TSEDL and TSES.

RESULTS

Compared with TSES, TSEDL was rated to be significantly superior in terms of image quality (p ≤ 0.020) with significantly reduced noise (p ≤ 0.001) and significantly improved edge sharpness (p = 0.003). No difference was found between TSES and TSEDL concerning the extent of artifacts, diagnostic confidence, or the delineation of anatomical structures (p > 0.05). Example acquisition time reductions for the TSE sequences of 52% at 3 Tesla and 70% at 1.5 Tesla were achieved.

CONCLUSION

TSEDL of the hip is clinically feasible, showing excellent image quality and equivalent diagnostic performance compared with TSES, reducing the acquisition time significantly.

Simultaneous Multislice Accelerated TSE for Improved Spatiotemporal Resolution and Diagnostic Accuracy in Magnetic Resonance Neurography: A Feasibility Study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the utility of simultaneous multislice (SMS) acceleration for routine magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) at 3 T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with multiple sclerosis underwent MRN of the sciatic nerve consisting of a standard fat-saturated T2-weighted turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence using integrated parallel acquisition technique (PAT2) acceleration and 2 T2 TSE sequences using a combination of PAT-SMS acceleration (1) to reduce scan time (PAT2-SMS2; SMS-TSE FAST ) and (2) for time neutral increase of in-plane resolution (PAT1-SMS2; SMS-TSE HR ). Acquisition times were 5:29 minutes for the standard T2 TSE, 3:12 minutes for the SMS-TSE FAST , and 5:24 minutes for the SMS-TSE HR . Six qualitative imaging parameters were analyzed by 2 blinded readers using a 5-point Likert scale and T2 nerve lesions were quantified, respectively. Qualitative and quantitative image parameters were compared, and both interrater and intrarater reproducibility were statistically assessed. In addition, signal-to-noise ratio/contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was obtained in healthy controls using the exact same imaging protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 15 patients with MS (mean age ± standard deviation, 38.1 ± 11 years) and 10 healthy controls (mean age, 29.1 ± 7 years) were enrolled in this study. CNR analysis was highly reliable (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.755-0.948) and revealed a significant CNR decrease for the sciatic nerve for both SMS protocols compared with standard T2 TSE (SMS-TSE FAST /SMS-TSE HR , -39%/-55%; P ≤ 0.01). Intrarater and interrater reliability of qualitative image review was good to excellent (κ: 0.672-0.971/0.617-0.883). Compared with the standard T2 TSE sequence, both SMS methods were shown to be superior in reducing pulsatile flow artifacts ( P < 0.01). Ratings for muscle border sharpness, detailed muscle structures, nerve border sharpness, and nerve fascicular structure did not differ significantly between the standard T2 TSE and the SMS-TSE FAST ( P > 0.05) and were significantly better for the SMS-TSE HR than for standard T2 TSE ( P < 0.001). Muscle signal homogeneity was mildly inferior for both SMS-TSE FAST ( P > 0.05) and SMS-TSE HR ( P < 0.001). A significantly higher number of T2 nerve lesions were detected by SMS-TSE HR ( P ≤ 0.01) compared with the standard T2 TSE and SMS-TSE FAST , whereas no significant difference was observed between the standard T2 TSE and SMS-TSE FAST .

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of SMS offers either to substantially reduce acquisition time by over 40% without significantly impeding image quality compared with the standard T2 TSE or to increase in-plane resolution for a high-resolution approach and improved depiction of T2 nerve lesions while keeping acquisition times constant. This addresses the specific needs of MRN by providing different imaging approaches for 2D clinical MRN.

Emerging Technology in Musculoskeletal MRI and CT

This article provides a focused overview of emerging technology in musculoskeletal MRI and CT. These technological advances have primarily focused on decreasing examination times, obtaining higher quality images, providing more convenient and economical imaging alternatives, and improving patient safety through lower radiation doses. New MRI acceleration methods using deep learning and novel reconstruction algorithms can reduce scanning times while maintaining high image quality. New synthetic techniques are now available that provide multiple tissue contrasts from a limited amount of MRI and CT data. Modern low-field-strength MRI scanners can provide a more convenient and economical imaging alternative in clinical practice, while clinical 7.0-T scanners have the potential to maximize image quality. Three-dimensional MRI curved planar reformation and cinematic rendering can provide improved methods for image representation. Photon-counting detector CT can provide lower radiation doses, higher spatial resolution, greater tissue contrast, and reduced noise in comparison with currently used energy-integrating detector CT scanners. Technological advances have also been made in challenging areas of musculoskeletal imaging, including MR neurography, imaging around metal, and dual-energy CT. While the preliminary results of these emerging technologies have been encouraging, whether they result in higher diagnostic performance requires further investigation.

Deep Learning-Enhanced Parallel Imaging and Simultaneous Multislice Acceleration Reconstruction in Knee MRI

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to examine various combinations of parallel imaging (PI) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) acceleration imaging using deep learning (DL)-enhanced and conventional reconstruction. The study also aimed at comparing the diagnostic performance of the various combinations in internal knee derangement and provided a quantitative evaluation of image sharpness and noise using edge rise distance (ERD) and noise power (NP), respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data from adult patients who underwent knee magnetic resonance imaging using various DL-enhanced acquisitions between June 2021 and January 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The participants underwent conventional 2-fold PI and DL protocols with 4- to 8-fold acceleration imaging (P2S2 [2-fold PI with 2-fold SMS], P3S2, and P4S2). Three readers evaluated the internal knee derangement and the overall image quality. The diagnostic performance was calculated using consensus reading as a standard reference, and we conducted comparative evaluations. We calculated the ERD and NP for quantitative evaluations of image sharpness and noise, respectively. Interreader and intermethod agreements were calculated using Fleiss κ.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients (mean age, 49 ± 19 years; 20 women) were included in this study. The diagnostic performance for internal knee derangement and the overall image quality were similar among the evaluated protocols. The NP values were significantly lower using the DL protocols than with conventional imaging ( P < 0.001), whereas the ERD values were similar among these methods ( P > 0.12). Interreader and intermethod agreements were moderate-to-excellent (κ = 0.574-0.838) and good-to-excellent (κ = 0.755-1.000), respectively. In addition, the mean acquisition time was reduced by 47% when using DL with P2S2, by 62% with P3S2, and by 71% with P4S2, compared with conventional P2 imaging (2 minutes and 55 seconds).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of DL-enhanced 8-fold acceleration imaging (4-fold PI with 2-fold SMS) showed comparable performance with conventional 2-fold PI for the evaluation of internal knee derangement, with a 71% reduction in acquisition time.

Three-dimensional SPACE MR with CAIPIRINHA fourfold acceleration for assessing long head of biceps tendon

BACKGROUND

Data regarding controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) T2-weighted sampling perfection with application optimized contrast evolution (SPACE) with fourfold acceleration factor for assessing long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) disorder is lacking.

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE with fourfold acceleration in assessing LHBT disorder.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 42 consecutive patients underwent shoulder magnetic resonance (MR) examinations including CAIPIRINHA SPACE with fourfold acceleration, and non-CAIPIRINHA SPACE with twofold acceleration, and 2D fast spin echo (FSE). A subjective score of depiction of LHBT was given to 3D sequence according to a 4-point scale (0-3, "poor" to "excellent"). The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare depiction scores between 3D sequences. Three statuses of LHBT were defined in the study: normal, tendonitis, and tear. McNemar's test was used compare diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

LHBT was better depicted with CAIPIRINHA SPACE versus non-CAIPIRINHA SPACE (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.5 ± 0.4; P < 0.001). Inter-modality agreement between CAIPIRINHA SPACE and 2D FSE was almost perfect (kappa = 0.884 ± 0.064). The sensitivity and specificity in detecting LHBT disorder were 95% (20/21) and 95% (20/21), respectively, for CAIPIRINHA SPACE, and 71% (15/21) and 76% (16/21), respectively, for non-CAIPIRINHA SPACE (P = 0.039).

CONCLUSION

Fourfold acceleration CAIPIRINHA is feasible in reducing the acquisition time of SPACE MR in the shoulder. 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE with fourfold acceleration is highly accurate in detecting LHBT disorder.

Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Musculoskeletal

We present an overview of current clinical musculoskeletal imaging applications for artificial intelligence, as well as potential future applications and techniques.

Five-Minute Five-Sequence Knee MRI Using Combined Simultaneous Multislice and Parallel Imaging Acceleration: Comparison with 10-Minute Parallel Imaging Knee MRI

Background Rapid knee MRI using combined simultaneous multislice (SMS) technique and parallel imaging (PI) acceleration can add value through reduced acquisition time but requires validation of clinical efficacy. Purpose To evaluate the performance of clinical fourfold SMS-PI-accelerated, 5-minute, five-sequence, multicontrast knee MRI protocols compared with standard twofold PI-accelerated, 10-minute knee MRI protocols. Materials and Methods Adults with painful knee conditions were prospectively enrolled from April 2018 to October 2019. Participants underwent fourfold SMS-PI-accelerated, 5-minute, turbo spin-echo (TSE) knee MRI and standard-of-care twofold PI-accelerated, 10-minute, TSE knee MRI at either 1.5 T or 3.0 T. Three radiologists independently evaluated the knee MRI studies for meniscal, tendinous, ligamentous, and osseocartilaginous injuries. Statistical analyses included k-based intermethod agreements and diagnostic performance testing. P < .05 was considered indicative of a statistically significant difference. Results A total of 252 adults were evaluated (mean age ± standard deviation, 47 years ± 17; 134 men). Among the participants, 104 (mean age, 42 years ± 18; 57 women) were in the 1.5-T arm and 148 (mean age, 46 years ± 17; 87 men) were in the 3.0-T arm. Twenty-nine participants (mean age, 38 years ± 12; 15 men) in the 1.5-T arm and 42 (mean age, 41 years ± 16; 24 men) in the 3.0-T arm underwent arthroscopy a mean of 45 days ± 31 and 45 days ± 22 after MRI, respectively. Intermethod agreements were good at 1.5 T (κ >0.71 [95% CI: 0.56, 0.83]) and very good at 3.0 T (κ >0.85 [95% CI: 0.69, 0.96]). The diagnostic performances of corresponding 5-minute and 10-minute MRI protocols were similar for 1.5 T, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) greater than 0.78 (95% CI: 0.71, 0.84) (P > .32), and 3.0 T, with AUCs greater than 0.83 (95% CI: 0.78, 0.88) (P > .32). Conclusion Comparisons of 5-minute five-sequence simultaneous multislice- and parallel imaging (PI)-accelerated and 10-minute five-sequence PI-accelerated turbo spin-echo MRI of the knee suggest similar performances at 1.5 and 3.0 T. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Subhas in this issue.