BRAF-mutated colorectal adenocarcinomas: pathological heterogeneity and clinical implications

BRAFV600E immunohistochemistry can reliably substitute BRAF molecular testing in the Lynch syndrome screening algorithm in colorectal cancer

AIMS

The Lynch syndrome (LS) screening algorithm requires BRAF testing as a fundamental step to distinguish sporadic from LS-associated colorectal carcinomas (CRC). BRAF testing by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has shown variable results in the literature. Our aim was to analyse concordance between BRAFV600E IHC and BRAF molecular analysis in a large, mono-institutional CRC whole-slide, case series with laboratory validation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

MisMatch repair (MMR) protein (hMLH1, hPMS2, hMSH2, and hMSH6) and BRAFV600E IHC were performed on all unselected cases of surgically resected CRCs (2018-2023). An in-house validation study for BRAFV600E IHC was performed in order to obtain optimal IHC stains. BRAFVV600E IHC was considered negative (score 0), positive (scores 2-3), and equivocal (score 1). Interobserver differences in BRAFV600E IHC scoring were noted in the first 150 cases prospectively collected. Nine-hundred and ninety CRCs cases (830 proficient (p)MMR/160 deficient (d)MMR) were included and all cases performed BRAFV600E IHC (BRAFV600E IHC-positive 13.5% of all series; 66.3% dMMR cases; 3.4% pMMR cases), while 333 also went to BRAF mutation analysis. Optimal agreement in IHC scoring between pathologists (P < 0.0001) was seen; concordance between BRAFV600E IHC and BRAF molecular analysis was extremely high (sensitivity 99.1%, specificity 99.5%; PPV 99.1%, and NPV 99.5%). Discordant cases were reevaluated; 1 score 3 + IHC/wildtype case was an interpretation error and one score 0 IHC/mutated case was related to heterogenous BRAFV600E IHC expression. Among the 12 IHC-equivocal score 1+ cases (which require BRAF molecular analysis), three were BRAF-mutated and nine BRAF-wildtype.

CONCLUSION

BRAFV600E IHC can be used as a reliable surrogate of molecular testing after stringent in-house validation.

Clinical research progress on BRAF V600E-mutant advanced colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the malignant tumors that pose a serious threat to human health. A particularly bad prognosis might be expected for colorectal tumors with the unique molecular subtype BRAF V600E mutation. With the development of precision therapy, the advent of molecularly targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors has improved the outcome of intermediate to advanced colorectal cancer. However, the duration of drug benefit is usually short, and overall survival and progression-free survival remain suboptimal. Therefore, investigators are exploring more rational, safe, and effective drug combination regimens through clinical trials to provide longer survival for patients with such genetic mutations with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This article reviews the progress of clinical research on molecularly targeted drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, first-line chemotherapeutic agents, and different combination therapy regimens (including different targeted drug combinations, immune combination targeting, and chemotherapy combination targeting) for colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation, which provides a reference for further in-depth clinical exploration of the treatment of colorectal cancer patients with BRAF V600E mutation.

Ibero-American Consensus Review and Incorporation of New Biomarkers for Clinical Practice in Colorectal Cancer

Advances in genomic technologies have significantly improved the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Several biomarkers have been identified in CRC that enable personalization in the use of biologic agents that have shown to enhance the clinical outcomes of patients. However, technologies used for their determination generate massive amounts of information that can be difficult for the clinician to interpret and use adequately. Through several discussion meetings, a group of oncology experts from Spain and several Latin American countries reviewed the latest literature to provide practical recommendations on the determination of biomarkers in CRC based on their clinical experience. The article also describes the importance of looking for additional prognostic biomarkers and the use of histopathology to establish an adequate molecular classification. Present and future of immunotherapy biomarkers in CRC patients are also discussed, together with several techniques for marker determination, including liquid biopsy, next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and fecal immunohistochemical tests. Finally, the role of Molecular Tumor Boards in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC is described. All of this information will allow us to highlight the importance of biomarker determination in CRC.

5’tiRNA-Pro-TGG, a novel tRNA halve, promotes oncogenesis in sessile serrated lesions and serrated pathway of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Transfer RNA (tRNA)-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs) are small fragments that form when tRNAs severe. tRNA halves (tiRNAs), a subcategory of tsRNA, are involved in the oncogenic processes of many tumors. However, their specific role in sessile serrated lesions (SSLs), a precancerous lesion often observed in the colon, has not yet been elucidated.

AIM

To identify SSL-related tiRNAs and their potential role in the development of SSLs and serrated pathway of colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Small-RNA sequencing was conducted in paired SSLs and their adjacent normal control (NC) tissues. The expression levels of five SSL-related tiRNAs were validated by q-polymerase chain reaction. Cell counting kit-8 and wound healing assays were performed to detect cell proliferation and migration. The target genes and sites of tiRNA-1:33-Pro-TGG-1 (5′tiRNA-Pro-TGG) were predicted by TargetScan and miRanda algorithms. Metabolism-associated and immune-related pathways were analyzed by single-sample gene set enrichment analysis. Functional analyses were performed to establish the roles of 5′tiRNA-Pro-TGG based on the target genes.

RESULTS

In total, we found 52 upregulated tsRNAs and 28 downregulated tsRNAs in SSLs compared to NC. The expression levels of tiRNA-1:33-Gly-CCC-2, tiRNA-1:33-Pro-TGG-1, and tiRNA-1:34-Thr-TGT-4-M2 5′tiRNAs were higher in SSLs than those in NC, while that of 5′tiRNA-Pro-TGG was associated with the size of SSLs. It was demonstrated that 5′tiRNA-Pro-TGG promoted cell proliferation and migration of RKO cell in vitro. Then, heparanase 2 (HPSE2) was identified as a potential target gene of 5′tiRNA-Pro-TGG. Its lower expression was associated with a worse prognosis in CRC. Further, lower expression of HPSE2 was observed in SSLs compared to normal controls or conventional adenomas and in BRAF-mutant CRC compared to BRAF-wild CRC. Bioinformatics analyses revealed that its low expression was associated with a low interferon γ response and also with many metabolic pathways such as riboflavin, retinol, and cytochrome p450 drug metabolism pathways.

CONCLUSION

tiRNAs may profoundly impact the development of SSLs. 5′tiRNA-Pro-TGG potentially promotes the progression of serrated pathway CRC through metabolic and immune pathways by interacting with HPSE2 and regulating its expression in SSLs and BRAF-mutant CRC. In the future, it may be possible to use tiRNAs as novel biomarkers for early diagnosis of SSLs and as potential therapeutic targets in serrated pathway of CRC.

The ideal reporting of RAS testing in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a pathologists' perspective

RAS gene mutational status represents an imperative predictive biomarker to be tested in the clinical management of metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma. Even if it is one of the most studied biomarkers in the era of precision medicine, several pre-analytical and analytical factors may still impasse an adequate reporting of RAS status in clinical practice, with significant therapeutic consequences. Thus, pathologists should be aware on the main topics related to this molecular evaluation: (i) adopt diagnostic limit of detections adequate to avoid the interference of sub-clonal cancer cell populations; (ii) choose the most adequate diagnostic strategy according to the available sample and its qualification for molecular testing; (iii) provide all the information regarding the mutation detected, since many RAS mutation-specific targeted therapeutic approaches are in development and will enter into routine clinical practice. In this review, we give a comprehensive description of the current scenario about RAS gene mutational testing in the clinic focusing on the pathologist's role in patient selection for targeted therapies.

European expert panel consensus on the clinical management of BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a heterogenous disease caused by various genetic alterations. The BRAF^V600E mutation occurs in approximately 8-12% of patients and is characterised by an aggressive clinical course and poor prognosis. Here we review the current knowledge on BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC and provide a series of consensus statements on its clinical management. The treatment landscape for BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC has changed greatly due to the emergence of molecular targeted therapies (including BRAF inhibitors) and immune checkpoint inhibitors. A scientific literature search identified available data on molecular testing, treatments, and clinical monitoring of patients with BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC. Consensus statements were discussed and developed by a European expert panel. This manuscript provides consensus management guidance for different clinical presentations of BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC and makes recommendations regarding treatment sequencing choices. To guide appropriate clinical management and treatment decisions for mCRC patients, tumour tissue analysis for DNA mismatch repair/microsatellite status and, at a minimum, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutational status is mandatory at the time of diagnosis. Finally, we discuss the rapidly evolving treatment landscape for BRAF^V600E-mutant mCRC and define priorities for the development of novel therapeutic strategies that are needed to improve patient outcomes.

Impact of DNA mismatch repair proteins deficiency on number and ratio of lymph nodal metastases in colorectal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Approximately 15 % of colorectal adenocarcinomas (CRCs) are characterized by an altered expression of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (i.e. MMR deficiency [MMRd]). Lymph node ratio (LNR) represents one of the most important prognostic markers in non-advanced CRCs. No significant data are available regarding LNR distribution depending on MMR status.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The aim of the present work was to compare pathological and clinical characteristics of MMRd tumors versus MMR proficient (MMRp) cases. Particular attention was paid to how these molecular sub-groups relate to the LNR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mono-Institutional series of 1037 consecutive surgically treated stage I-IV CRCs were retrospectively selected and data were obtained from pathological reports. Cases were characterized for MMR/MSI status by means of immunohistochemistry or for microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis.

RESULTS

MMRd/MSI tumors (n = 194; 18.7 %) showed significant differences in comparison to MMRp lesions for sex (female prevalence 50.5 % vs 40.7 %; p = 0.013), age (74.2 vs 69.2; p < 0.001), location (right side; p < 0.001), diameter (larger than MMRp; p < 0.001), growth pattern (expansive pattern of growth; p < 0.001), peri- (p = 0.0002) and intra-neoplastic (p = 0.0018) inflammatory infiltrate, presence of perineural invasion (p < 0.001), stage (lower stage at presentation; p < 0.001), grade (higher prevalence of high-grade tumors; p < 0.001), and LNR (lower; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MMRd/MSI tumors are a distinct molecular CRC subtype characterized by a significantly lower LNR in comparison to MMRp lesions. These data further support the prognostic impact of MMRd/MSI status in early-stage CRCs.

Colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma: genomic profiling of a rare histotype of colorectal cancer

Colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is exceedingly rare, comprising less than 0.1% of all colorectal malignancies, and is characterized by an aggressive disease course, with a higher metastatic rate and worse outcome than conventional colorectal adenocarcinoma. A comprehensive molecular profile of this group of neoplasms is still lacking. A total of 22 cases of colorectal ASCs (with 22 primary lesions and 7 metastases matched with 4 primaries) were subject to NGS targeting 67 cancer-related genes (VariantPlex solid tumor; Archer). Mismatch repair (MMR), p53, and ^V600EBRAF status were also investigated by immunohistochemistry. In 28 of 29 (96.6%) ASC samples, at least one single-nucleotide variant (SNV) or copy number variation (CNV) was detected. Among the 22 primary tumors, the most frequently mutated genes were TP53 (59.1%), APC (40.9%), KRAS (27.3%), BRAF (13.6%), and GNAS (9.1%). Only 1/22 (4.5%) primary ASC was MMR-deficient (MMRd) and harbored a BRAF mutation. Limited differences in SNVs were observed between primary and metastatic diseases. This study sheds light on the molecular landscape of colorectal ASCs. According to our data, the genomic profile of colorectal ASC is similar to that of conventional colorectal carcinoma, with significant druggable genetic alterations. Further studies are required to understand the more aggressive clinical behavior of this neoplasm.

Safety and efficacy of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (XELOXIRI) regimen with or without targeted drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Five-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) regimen is used as the first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The use of capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine pro-drug, is feasible and safe; hence, it provides an interesting alternative to 5-fluorouracil in the abovementioned regimen. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (XELOXIRI) regimen use with or without targeted drugs in Chinese patients with mCRC.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study of patients with mCRC who received XELOXIRI regimen with or without targeted drugs (bevacizumab or cetuximab) every 2 weeks between January 2017 and November 2019 at the National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, and Peking Union Medical College. Treatment efficacy was assessed by investigators by evaluating the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models. The adverse events were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one consecutive patients were examined and followed up for survival. As of November 8, 2021, the median follow-up time was 35.4 months. Disease progression and death occurred in 50 (82%) and 38 (62%) patients, respectively. The median treatment duration of XELOXIRI with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab was 10 cycles (range, 1-12 cycles). The median OS and PFS were 32.2 months (95%CI [24.8-39.6]) and 9.3 months (95% CI [8.1-10.5]), respectively. The ORR of 48 patients with measurable lesions was 70.8%, and the DCR was 89.6%. RAS/BRAF wild-type (HR 0.39; 95% CI [0.16-0.96], p = 0.04) and metastatic organs > 2 (HR 3.25; 95% CI [1.34-7.87], p = 0.009) were independent prognostic factors for OS. The incidence of any grade of adverse events (AEs) was 96.7% (59/61). Grade ≥ 3 AEs included neutropenia (19.7%), leukopenia (9.8%), diarrhea (3.3%), vomiting (3.3%), febrile neutropenia (1.6%), and thrombocytopenia (1.6%). No treatment-related death occurred.

CONCLUSION

The use of the XELOXIRI regimen with or without a targeted drug was effective, with a manageable toxicity profile in Chinese patients with mCRC.